Re: [Repeater-Builder] Maratrac Remote Base?

2004-10-10 Thread Mike WA6ILQ

And I'm looking for a UHF manual and a logic board.

And on the www.repeater-builder.com article wish-list page
at http://www.repeater-builder.com/rbtip/article-ideas.html
there are three on the Maratrac:

1) An overview of the Maratrac (essentially a 100w trunk mount 99-channel 
Maxtrac)

2) Moving a 450-470 MHz Maratrac to cover the 440-450 MHz amateur band - or
even to 430-450 if the PA deck will do it

3) Same as above for a 150-170mhz to cover 2 meters.

If anybody wants to write something up I'll make room for it.

Mike WA6ILQ

At 03:01 PM 10/9/04, you wrote:

while on Maratracs  does any body have a advanced control head for one and
possibly the control cable also. reply direct to me thank you..
B





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






Re: [Repeater-Builder] Maratrac Remote Base?

2004-10-10 Thread mch

Well, I'm using just the box on 10M. Seems to work great (even better
than most repeaters) at full power with just a fan.

There are 'brains' in any remote mount radio control head. Yet, people
use just the box all the time. (MASTR IIs, Micors, Mitreks, Etc.)

You just have to replace the volume and squelch controls, the frequency
steering, and the on/off controls - same as any other.

Joe M.

 James wrote:
 
 If I remember right, there is still brains in the clamshell head. If
 you use just the box, I'd be curious if it would work.
 
 James
 
 mch wrote:
 
  Not really - just reprogram it to a clamshell model.
  You wouldn't be using the head anyway, just the box.
 
  Joe M.
 
 
 
  James wrote:
 
  If you use the Clamshell head, the unit will support BCD control
  (there are 4 channel control lines, I do not have the truth table
  around for it). On the advanced head, you are out of luck.
 
  James
 
  Brian Poellnitz wrote:
 
 
 
   Haven't seen this done, but it should be possible if the radio is
   programmed to use a Clamshell control head... I'll get my hands
   on a
   manual and see what the possibilities are.  I have a UHF unit
   that
   I'd
   like to put into service this way too.
  
   73's de N4BWP,
   Brian
  
   --- wb5nfc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  
  
  
  
Is anyone remotely controlling the frequency of a maratrac or
similar
  
unit? Just got a 100 watt VHF that I would love to put into
remote
base service.
  
John
WB5NFC
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   ___
   Do you Yahoo!?
   Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
   http://vote.yahoo.com
  
  
  
  
  
   Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  ---
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 * To visit your group on the web, go to:
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
 
 * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
   Service.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
 
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
  Service.





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






[Repeater-Builder] Manual Wanted

2004-10-10 Thread Bob


Wanted Service manual for Kenwood TK-840 UHF Radio
Service manual or CopyContact off list to
Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED]









 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






[Repeater-Builder] ForSale or Trade

2004-10-10 Thread Bob


MOTOROLA MITREK 110 WATT MOBILE FULL DUPLEX REPEATER ON 461 MHZ CAN
BE TUNE TO 440 MHZ HAMBANDS,HAS PL BOARD,ALL YOU NEED IS YOUR
FREQUENCY PAIRS AND CONTROLER,NO MANUAL OR DUPLEXERS $250.00 PLUS
SHIPPING OR TRADE FOR 2/440 MOBILE RADIO CROSSBAND REPEAT

CONNECT SYSTEMS INC REPEATER TONE PANEL CONTROLER TP-154 WITH MANUAL
WILL WORK WITH ANY REPEATER,OR RADIOS TO MAKE A REPEATER, $250.00
SHIPPED OR TRADE

CONTACT Bobby/N2BR [EMAIL PROTECTED]








 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






[Repeater-Builder] Re: FS: GE MASTR2 VHF 100w base/repeater

2004-10-10 Thread ve3rsd



Hi Kevin:

I am new to the world of repeaters and may be in the market for a used
2m repeater.  Could you please let me know what you are asking for the
repeater, whether it comes with a duplexer, and how easy is it to
change the operating frequencies.

If you wish to contact me off-list with pricing, etc., my email addr
is va3uv(at)rac.ca

73 de
Ramesh.



--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Kevin Custer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Wow Kevin, sounds like you got a [EMAIL PROTECTED] repeater
 with 330 watts on 2meters.
 
 Question for you: How many watts ERP is your repeater
 putting out? What type of antenna will handle 330
 watts?
 
 
 The repeater is actually outputting (and is coordinated for) 250 watts 
 into the duplexer.  Subtracting the duplexer insertion loss of 1.5 dB 
 (or 29 %), I get about 175 watts to the bottom of the feeder which I 
 lose an additional 1/2 a dB or so, so I really get about 158 watts to 
 the stick (Sinclair SRL-229) which has a rated gain of 6.1 dBd, so my 
 ERP is about 650 watts.  The antenna will handle 300 watts, so I'd need 
 to run over 400 watts for that to be a concern.
 
 I have run this station for short periods of time at the 330 watt level 
 for testing.  There isn't much difference in ERP between the 250 and
330 
 watt level, so I choose to save on the electric bill and keep the 
 coordinator happy and run it at the 1/4 kilowatt level.
 
 Kevin










 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






Re: [Repeater-Builder] Maxtrac conversion to 220?

2004-10-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]


YES A 220 MHZ CONVERTED MAXTRAC WOULD BE NICE. IF THE INFO IS AROUND PLEASE 
SEND ME A COPY.

ALSO AS ON BATLABS I BELIEVE THE 99 CHANNEL MAXTRAC WAS LOWBAND IT HAD A LARGER 
MEMORY PROM TO HOLD THE PROGRAMMING DATA FOR 99 CHANNELS AND THE SOFTWARE WAS A 
SPECIAL VERSION THE ONLY CUSTOMER WAS A CANADIAN POWER COMPANY. 

BUT WAS THE MARATRAC 99 CHANNEL RADIO AN OFFSHOOT OF THIS VARRIANT ?

BOB KD6GNB


Speed up your surfing with Juno SpeedBand.
Now includes pop-up blocker!
Only $14.95/ month - visit http://www.juno.com/surf to sign up today!




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






RE: [Repeater-Builder] Off topic a bit.

2004-10-10 Thread Ted Leonard





Hi 
Russ,

Be 
Careful driving in New York with a scanner. Sec 397 of the V+T Law makes it a 
misdemeanor to have a radio in your car capable of receiving police 
transmissions unless you are law enforcement or have a permit. There is a vague 
clause in the section that was probably intended to exclude hams but it is 
poorly worded. I would hate to see your trip ruined by an over zealous 
officer. 

73 Ted 
n2isq

  -Original Message-From: russ 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 8:23 
  AMTo: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comSubject: 
  [Repeater-Builder] Off topic a bit.
  
  Hello All,
  My lovely bride and I are takeing a week and going up to Canada for a 
  week next month. What my question is. I want to plug in the police into my 
  scanner to listen on the way up. Does any of you from the north know what 
  frequensya the state police use in New York state?
  I we are going across the lower teir and I belive it is I-390 north to 
  the NY thruway west to Bufalo NY then over in to Canada. Then does any one 
  know any local frequecy in Nigra Canada? Some some thing to monitor while I 
  drive smile Also any repeaters along the way? I have all the PA, and 
  south stuff ready to dump from my computer to the Bearcat.
  Any good GMRS open repeaters along the way? (In the US)
  Thank you ahead of time for the help!
  Very best of 73,
  Russ, W3CH













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










[Repeater-Builder] I think I got burned by kd6hcn!

2004-10-10 Thread F. Barry Thompson



Hello List,
Some confusion has hit this list as to my identity, one person has 
accused myself of being a crook and taking money without supplying 
goods, the email address I have always used for mail list servers has 
always been my first FCC callsign I received back in 1992 of KD6HCN.

In Jan 2003 I changed callsigns to N6CID which is my current 
callsign along with several others i.e. GMRS WPUD704  Club callsign 
KG6KCL as trustee for our repeater.

I currently have three addresses in which I maybe contacted, the 
address on my Ham call is a permanant mailing address (mom  dads 
house) required by the FCC part 97.x for correspondance (snail mail).

My club callsign KG6KCL also resolves to my Ham callsign address.

My GMRS license resolves to my second address in which I can receive 
regular mail here in San Jose where I currently reside.

My third mailing address is my cabin and nobody has this address, not 
even uncle Sugar.

If anyone has questions regarding my credentials you may feel free 
contact me offline or look up my yahoo profile for verification (I'm 
the guy on the right in the picture).

Regards, Barry N6CID formerly KD6HCN

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Critic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I sent money to [EMAIL PROTECTED] AKA  F. Barry Thompson on monday and 
havent recieved any responce for any of my e-mailes to him and the 
kd6hcn call seems to be BOGUS on the fcc web site.










 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






[Repeater-Builder] How to reduce Interference Signal ?

2004-10-10 Thread Wendi



I have a vhf band voice-repeater station that located at near-top 
mountain (approx. 9000 feet above sea level). And many repeater 
station, vhf-uhf, located at there too.
I got a problem that I can't solve. The input signal always annoyed by 
interference noise signal. Although I have put two own-made Bandpass 
Cavity filter before rx unit.
I use Hustler G5-150 and, I don't know the brand of RX unit, but some 
people says that is Intron, taxi radio. That type T-530. I use tone 
encoder too. 10D-FB as the cable.

Can anyone help me?










 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






[Repeater-Builder] Repeaters for sale

2004-10-10 Thread Q


1- GE MastrII 110 watt cont.duty VHF base station on 146.04/.64 in cabinet
with the GE ferro-resonant 30 amp power supply.Clean. $600 (no duplexer)
1- GE MastrII 110 watt VHF mobile on 146.04/.64 nicely converted to a
repeater and wired for an NHRC-2 controller. $300 (no duplexer)
Both professionally converted and maintained in good working order.
Inquire DIRECT to res0s7ndatverizondotnet









 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






Re: [Repeater-Builder] Test measurements

2004-10-10 Thread Kevin Custer

stanleyradio wrote:

Hi all,

   I am trying to tune up my duplexed E.F. Johnson PPl 6060 on the 
440 band.  There are some directions on the repeater-builder site 
that dictate measuring the oscillator voltages with an analog 
voltmeter.  I should be trying to measure AC voltage, right? 


No,  DC voltages

  Also, it seems that when I try to use my improvised signal 
generator (handheld radio) anywhere near my voltmeter its readings 
fluctuate all over the scale.  What am I doing wrong, or does my 
voltmeter just suck? 


Once you switch to DC, your fluctuations should be at a minimum.

Kevin






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






Re: [Repeater-Builder] Test measurements

2004-10-10 Thread Eric Lemmon

Dayne,

No, the majority of voltage readings taken during alignment are DC, and
should be made with a high-impedance DVM or VTVM.  The only AC
measurements needed are for squelch setting.  This info comes from my
PPL-6060 service manual.

Most DVMs don't function well in a high RF field, so keep your handheld
radio away from it while taking readings.

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY

stanleyradio wrote:
 
 Hi all,
 
I am trying to tune up my duplexed E.F. Johnson PPl 6060 on the
 440 band.  There are some directions on the repeater-builder site
 that dictate measuring the oscillator voltages with an analog
 voltmeter.  I should be trying to measure AC voltage, right?
 
   Also, it seems that when I try to use my improvised signal
 generator (handheld radio) anywhere near my voltmeter its readings
 fluctuate all over the scale.  What am I doing wrong, or does my
 voltmeter just suck?
 
 Thanks,
 Dayne Olmstead
 KD7JAH
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: FS: GE MASTR2 VHF 100w base/repeater

2004-10-10 Thread Kevin Custer






Hi Ramesh,

You must have tuned in late; the repeater I referred to herein, isn't
'For Sale'. I have more in this repeater then most have in 3 or four
of them. grin

We do however do custom/professional repeater conversions from
commercial gear such as the GE Mastr II and Motorola Micor, from either
Stations or Mobiles. Go here to view what we have to offer:
http://www.repeater-builder.com/rbtip/custombuilt.html

ve3rsd wrote:

  Hi Kevin:

I am new to the world of repeaters and may be in the market for a used
2m repeater.  Could you please let me know what you are asking for the
repeater, whether it comes with a duplexer, and how easy is it to
change the operating frequencies.

If you wish to contact me off-list with pricing, etc., my email addr
is va3uv(at)rac.ca

73 de
Ramesh.



--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Kevin Custer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



  Wow Kevin, sounds like you got a [EMAIL PROTECTED] repeater
with 330 watts on 2meters.

Question for you: How many watts ERP is your repeater
putting out? What type of antenna will handle 330
watts?

  

The repeater is actually outputting (and is coordinated for) 250 watts 
into the duplexer.  Subtracting the duplexer insertion loss of 1.5 dB 
(or 29 %), I get about 175 watts to the bottom of the feeder which I 
lose an additional 1/2 a dB or so, so I really get about 158 watts to 
the stick (Sinclair SRL-229) which has a rated gain of 6.1 dBd, so my 
ERP is about 650 watts.  The antenna will handle 300 watts, so I'd need 
to run over 400 watts for that to be a concern.

I have run this station for short periods of time at the 330 watt level 
for testing.  There isn't much difference in ERP between the 250 and

  
  330 
  
  
watt level, so I choose to save on the electric bill and keep the 
coordinator happy and run it at the 1/4 kilowatt level.

Kevin
  















Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.











Re: [Repeater-Builder] Off topic a bit.

2004-10-10 Thread Brent





Just wondering , but if and i know it is unlawful 
to have a scanner or radio capable of monitoring in on police 
communication..that is whatSec 37 sates, but now there is the internet .. 
if one was drive aroundwith a sat. card in the laptop or other 
means of internet and audio.. and we listening to streaming audio like the 
policescan.us where would that fall into..under the Sec 37

Hey if you do listen make sure you have that 
instant CLEAR reset button at hand.. J/K
Brent

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Ted Leonard 
  
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  
  Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 10:31 
  AM
  Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Off topic 
  a bit.
  
  Hi 
  Russ,
  
  Be 
  Careful driving in New York with a scanner. Sec 397 of the V+T Law makes it a 
  misdemeanor to have a radio in your car capable of receiving police 
  transmissions unless you are law enforcement or have a permit. There is a 
  vague clause in the section that was probably intended to exclude hams but it 
  is poorly worded. I would hate to see your trip ruined by an over zealous 
  officer. 
  
  73 
  Ted n2isq
  
-Original Message-From: russ 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 8:23 
AMTo: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comSubject: 
[Repeater-Builder] Off topic a bit.

Hello All,
My lovely bride and I are takeing a week and going up to Canada for a 
week next month. What my question is. I want to plug in the police into my 
scanner to listen on the way up. Does any of you from the north know what 
frequensya the state police use in New York state?
I we are going across the lower teir and I belive it is I-390 north to 
the NY thruway west to Bufalo NY then over in to Canada. Then does any one 
know any local frequecy in Nigra Canada? Some some thing to monitor while I 
drive smile Also any repeaters along the way? I have all the PA, and 
south stuff ready to dump from my computer to the Bearcat.
Any good GMRS open repeaters along the way? (In the US)
Thank you ahead of time for the help!
Very best of 73,
Russ, 
W3CH













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










Re: [Repeater-Builder] Off topic a bit.

2004-10-10 Thread mch

Simple answer: You're not receiving a police transmission. You're
receiving a retransmission of a police transmission. It's like a ham
repeater. Anyone on a repeater is not listening to the ham's signal -
you're listening to the repeater's signal.

Joe M.


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Just wondering , but if and i know it is unlawful to have a scanner or
radio capable of monitoring in on
police communication..that is what Sec 37 sates, but now there is the
internet .. if one was  drive
around with  a sat. card in the laptop or other means of internet and
audio.. and we listening to streaming
audio like the policescan.us where would that fall into..under the Sec
37





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






Re: [Repeater-Builder] Off topic a bit.

2004-10-10 Thread Roger Grady
At 12:59 PM 10/10/04, mch wrote:


Simple answer: You're not receiving a police transmission. You're
receiving a retransmission of a police transmission. It's like a ham
repeater. Anyone on a repeater is not listening to the ham's signal -
you're listening to the repeater's signal.

That may be technically true, but I wouldn't want to bet on the 
effectiveness of the argument to an officer who didn't like the idea of you 
listening to police traffic.

Roger Grady  K9OPO




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Off topic a bit.

2004-10-10 Thread mch

So what is he going to do? Confiscate your laptop? That would set a very
dangerous precedent. Remember - if they confiscate something under that
law, they HAVE to return it in the same condition it was confiscated.
Confiscated equipment under that law is not contraband.

Also, keep in mind that the scanner doesn't even have to be ON - somple
posession of a receiver is enough. So, under your definition, any laptop
is CAPIBLE of receiving police transmissions? The guy would have to be
having a really bad day to push that through.

There is STILL the ham exemption.

But, we've wantered significantly off topic.

Joe M.

Roger Grady wrote:
 
 At 12:59 PM 10/10/04, mch wrote:
 
 Simple answer: You're not receiving a police transmission. You're
 receiving a retransmission of a police transmission. It's like a ham
 repeater. Anyone on a repeater is not listening to the ham's signal -
 you're listening to the repeater's signal.
 
 That may be technically true, but I wouldn't want to bet on the
 effectiveness of the argument to an officer who didn't like the idea of you
 listening to police traffic.
 
 Roger Grady  K9OPO
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






Re: [Repeater-Builder] Off topic a bit.

2004-10-10 Thread russ

Boy to you need a lifesmile
Thank You and 73,
Russ, W3CH

- Original Message - 
From: mch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2004 1:59 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Off topic a bit.


 
 Simple answer: You're not receiving a police transmission. You're
 receiving a retransmission of a police transmission. It's like a ham
 repeater. Anyone on a repeater is not listening to the ham's signal -
 you're listening to the repeater's signal.
 
 Joe M.
 
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Just wondering , but if and i know it is unlawful to have a scanner or
 radio capable of monitoring in on
 police communication..that is what Sec 37 sates, but now there is the
 internet .. if one was  drive
 around with  a sat. card in the laptop or other means of internet and
 audio.. and we listening to streaming
 audio like the policescan.us where would that fall into..under the Sec
 37
 
 
 
 
 
  
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
  
 
 
 




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






Re: [Repeater-Builder] Off topic a bit.

2004-10-10 Thread mch

No - you're listening to the internet. The key is that you are not
receiving police FREQUENCIES.

What if someone would retransmit them on the FM broadcast band? Would
the police confiscate all AM/FM stereos?

Joe M.

Brent wrote:
 
 TRUE ,, you are still either way listening to the POLICE..
 But I was just wondering  no BIG deal .. you all have a good weekend
 got to get back to working  on a uhf link , 73's
 Russ take care on your trip, be good hehe
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Roger Grady [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2004 2:37 PM
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Off topic a bit.
 
  At 12:59 PM 10/10/04, mch wrote:
 
 
  Simple answer: You're not receiving a police transmission. You're
  receiving a retransmission of a police transmission. It's like a ham
  repeater. Anyone on a repeater is not listening to the ham's signal -
  you're listening to the repeater's signal.
 
  That may be technically true, but I wouldn't want to bet on the
  effectiveness of the argument to an officer who didn't like the idea of
 you
  listening to police traffic.
 
  Roger Grady  K9OPO
 
 
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses at TNWEB LLC]
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






Re: [Repeater-Builder] Off topic a bit.

2004-10-10 Thread russ





Thank You very much for the Heads up. Police permit is taken care of but no 
Fire dept. monitoring sad.
Very Best of 73,Russ, W3CH

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Brent 
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  
  Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2004 1:43 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Off topic 
  a bit.
  
  Just wondering , but if and i know it is unlawful 
  to have a scanner or radio capable of monitoring in on police 
  communication..that is whatSec 37 sates, but now there is the internet 
  .. if one was drive aroundwith a sat. card in the laptop or 
  other means of internet and audio.. and we listening to streaming audio like 
  the policescan.us where would that fall into..under the Sec 37
  
  Hey if you do listen make sure you have that 
  instant CLEAR reset button at hand.. J/K
  Brent
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Ted Leonard 

To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 

Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 10:31 
AM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Off 
topic a bit.

Hi 
Russ,

Be 
Careful driving in New York with a scanner. Sec 397 of the V+T Law makes it 
a misdemeanor to have a radio in your car capable of receiving police 
transmissions unless you are law enforcement or have a permit. There is a 
vague clause in the section that was probably intended to exclude hams but 
it is poorly worded. I would hate to see your trip ruined by an over zealous 
officer. 

73 
Ted n2isq

  -Original Message-From: russ 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 8:23 
  AMTo: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comSubject: 
  [Repeater-Builder] Off topic a bit.
  
  Hello All,
  My lovely bride and I are takeing a week and going up to Canada for a 
  week next month. What my question is. I want to plug in the police into my 
  scanner to listen on the way up. Does any of you from the north know what 
  frequensya the state police use in New York state?
  I we are going across the lower teir and I belive it is I-390 north 
  to the NY thruway west to Bufalo NY then over in to Canada. Then does any 
  one know any local frequecy in Nigra Canada? Some some thing to monitor 
  while I drive smile Also any repeaters along the way? I have all 
  the PA, and south stuff ready to dump from my computer to the 
  Bearcat.
  Any good GMRS open repeaters along the way? (In the US)
  Thank you ahead of time for the help!
  Very best of 73,
  Russ, 
  W3CH













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










Re: [Repeater-Builder] Off topic a bit.

2004-10-10 Thread Brent

TRUE ,, you are still either way listening to the POLICE..
But I was just wondering  no BIG deal .. you all have a good weekend
got to get back to working  on a uhf link , 73's
Russ take care on your trip, be good hehe

- Original Message -
From: Roger Grady [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2004 2:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Off topic a bit.


 At 12:59 PM 10/10/04, mch wrote:


 Simple answer: You're not receiving a police transmission. You're
 receiving a retransmission of a police transmission. It's like a ham
 repeater. Anyone on a repeater is not listening to the ham's signal -
 you're listening to the repeater's signal.

 That may be technically true, but I wouldn't want to bet on the
 effectiveness of the argument to an officer who didn't like the idea of
you
 listening to police traffic.

 Roger Grady  K9OPO





 Yahoo! Groups Links






---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses at TNWEB LLC]





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






[Repeater-Builder] CTCSS/PL Acquisition Time- What's Considered High Perofrmance?

2004-10-10 Thread Steve Rodgers


What is considered a high performance number for CTCSS/PL ackquisition time?
According to what I see posted on the web (which may or may not be real) The 
Comspec TS-32 is 250msec, and the TS-64 is 150msec.  The actual decode time
should get worse as you go lower in frequency, so what would you think are 
high performance numbers for at say, 67 hz?


Steve
WA6ZFT




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






Re: [Repeater-Builder] Test measurements

2004-10-10 Thread Mike WA6ILQ

One trick on setting up a RX using a improvised sig gen...
After the receiver is tuned into the neighborhood, don't
use the TX in the handheld.  Look up in your owners
manual and find out what the radio uses for the high IF and
calculate what frequency you'd punch into the RX to place
the local oscillator right on the frequency of interest.
Then use the LO as a source for the final tuning.
You may have to use a scanner if your handheld won't
go there.

Mike WA6ILQ

At 10:44 AM 10/10/04, you wrote:

Dayne,

No, the majority of voltage readings taken during alignment are DC, and
should be made with a high-impedance DVM or VTVM.  The only AC
measurements needed are for squelch setting.  This info comes from my
PPL-6060 service manual.

Most DVMs don't function well in a high RF field, so keep your handheld
radio away from it while taking readings.

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY

stanleyradio wrote:
 
  Hi all,
 
 I am trying to tune up my duplexed E.F. Johnson PPl 6060 on the
  440 band.  There are some directions on the repeater-builder site
  that dictate measuring the oscillator voltages with an analog
  voltmeter.  I should be trying to measure AC voltage, right?
 
Also, it seems that when I try to use my improvised signal
  generator (handheld radio) anywhere near my voltmeter its readings
  fluctuate all over the scale.  What am I doing wrong, or does my
  voltmeter just suck?
 
  Thanks,
  Dayne Olmstead
  KD7JAH





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






Re: [Repeater-Builder] CTCSS/PL Acquisition Time- What's Considered High Performance?

2004-10-10 Thread Eric Lemmon

Steve,

The industry standard for Land Mobile Radio is TIA-603-B.  This standard
states that the maximum response time for CTCSS frequencies 100 Hz and
above shall be 250 ms.  Below 100 Hz, the maximum response time in
milliseconds is found by dividing 25,000 by the CTCSS frequency in Hz. 
Therefore, a CTCSS frequency of 67 Hz must be decoded within 373 ms. 
Note that this standard is based upon a CTCSS deviation of 500 Hz.

Modern receivers use digital signal processing, which may respond much
faster than either PLL or reed based schemes.  Personally, I like radios
to unmute for CTCSS in 150 ms or less, but I'm not going to choose a
brand or a model to achieve the quickest response time.  I ignore the
specsmanship game played by some decoder manufacturers; they know what
TIA-603-B requires, and they might state better than or maximum or
typical response times.  Who knows?  Most of them seem to work okay...

It is true that higher CTCSS tones decode quicker, but some some radios-
Amateur rigs in particular- have little or no high-pass filtering to
keep the tones out of the speaker audio, and the higher frequency tones
are more likely to make it through the receive audio chain and cause an
annoying buzz to be heard.  This effect can be minimized by keeping the
tone deviation within the 500-700 Hz range.

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY

Steve Rodgers wrote:
 
 What is considered a high performance number for CTCSS/PL ackquisition time?
 According to what I see posted on the web (which may or may not be real) The
 Comspec TS-32 is 250msec, and the TS-64 is 150msec.  The actual decode time
 should get worse as you go lower in frequency, so what would you think are
 high performance numbers for at say, 67 hz?
 
 Steve
 WA6ZFT
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






[Repeater-Builder] Micor or Mitrek elements

2004-10-10 Thread Mike WA6ILQ

Anybody got a extra 144.39 Micor RX element before
I go ordering a new crystal for one of my extras?

How about a 52.525 set for a 6m Mitrek?

Or a set on 146.22 / 82mhz or  a 146.52 set for
a high band Mitrek?

Mike WA6ILQ





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/