Re: SM 2.33 Dual core architecture
Philip Chee wrote on 21/03/15 15:47: On 21/03/2015 01:06, Ant wrote: On 3/20/2015 2:03 AM, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote: stan wrote on 20/03/15 15:21: Does SM 2.33 support dual core architecture on Windows7 32 bit? I mean does it take advantage of the dual core by increasing a speed. Yep! Compared to single-cores and hard-drives, SM utilises multiprocessors and SSDs. Hmm, when SM hogs CPU, I only see a single core used? Maybe it is my very old, updated Windows XP Pro SP3? Historically SeaMonkey is a single process multithreaded application. With current versions the plugin container runs in a second process. The (in progress) Firefox Electrolysis (e10s) project moves Firefox to a multiprocess architecture. E10s is still a work in progress but if you turn it on, the contents of all the tabs run in a single separate process. Eventually each tab content may be a separate process. Each process runs on a single core. I don't know if Gecko implements it's own thread manager or uses OS threads. The OS may or may not run separate threads on separate execution units. The CPU may or may not be multithreaded. Intel high end CPUs are hyperthreaded. AMD Bulldozer modules are clustered multithreading. Phil Much appreciated Phil. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: PDF.js stopped working.
Daniel wrote on 20/03/15 20:58: On 20/03/15 13:47, Cruz, Jaime wrote: Cruz, Jaime wrote: WaltS48 wrote: On 03/19/2015 08:09 PM, Cruz, Jaime wrote: Just noticed that the PDF.js extension no longer works, and there doesn't seem to be any newer version since it was rolled into Firefox. I tried disabling it, but instead of displaying the PDF in the browser, it offered to download it instead... :( Switch to Firefox. :) It's starting to come to that. Seamonkey seems to be falling farther and farther behind the curve. Bugs aren't getting fixed but just perpetuate from one release to the next as they try to keep up with Firefox's ridiculous release cycle. It's just that I can't STAND the Firefox interface, I much prefer Seamonkey's... but it's almost like they're trying to force my hand here. :-( Good news! There is a Development Version of PDF.js that does work with Seamonkey. You can find it here: https://github.com/mozilla/pdf.js/ Scroll down till you can find the link to Development Version and click on that. It'll install the latest version of PDF.js and you can view Acrobat documents in the browser again. Jamie, when I click the link and install PDF.js, and then check the Add-ons Manager, it tells me that the PDF.js I just installed is no longer working. Could this be because I'm using the SM 2.33 *Beta* version rather than the 2.33 Final release?? Could be because even in the development version, the install.rdf max.version = SM 2.30, despite working fine in the experimental nightly trunk dev. builds. Possibly needlessly, I edited mine up to SM 2.* in case of conflict. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey on Mac: Toolbar unresponsive
On 21.03.15 2:58, ismand...@hotmail.com wrote: Using SM 2.13.2 on Mac OS X 10.5.8 (the last supported version for Mac Leopard). Every so often the top toolbar freezes and becomes unresponsive. The only way for me to reactivate it is to restart SM. The right-hand toolbar (clock, Spotlight etc.) is not affected. Any ideas? Starting taskmanager sometimes un-freezes my mouse. Just with ctrl/alt/del start it. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.33 Dual core architecture
Ant wrote on 21/03/15 01:06: On 3/20/2015 2:03 AM, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote: stan wrote on 20/03/15 15:21: Does SM 2.33 support dual core architecture on Windows7 32 bit? I mean does it take advantage of the dual core by increasing a speed. Yep! Compared to single-cores and hard-drives, SM utilises multiprocessors and SSDs. Hmm, when SM hogs CPU, I only see a single core used? Maybe it is my very old, updated Windows XP Pro SP3? Ant, I suspect you are right about OS restrictions. I'd completely ignored that angle. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey/Mozilla Page Display
NoOp wrote on 21/03/15 13:17: Why is it that SeaMonkey and Firefox do not display this webpage properly? http://www.taintedwine.com/test-results Screenshots: SeaMonkey 2.33: http://postimg.org/image/5h0nnnse3/ Firefox 36.0.3 http://postimg.org/image/5fqpu8qkb/ Same link with: Ephiphany Browser: http://postimg.org/image/uvz6kf6gr/ Opera Browser: http://postimg.org/image/ht3k15g8r/ and of course Chrome Chromium as the same. https://www.flickr.com/photos/64156765@N03/16878470132/ confirming displaced layout in build:- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:39.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/39.0 SeaMonkey/2.36a1 ID:20150311081138 CSet: d4d00354095f ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Organised View of mails hierarchially: please make it more powerfully organised like tree view in file manager
In the beginning the items in the list were just mails. Then they could be grouped of mails based on conversation (threaded view) So now if these 'many' conversations were regrouped based on the 'few' other person we are dealing, it would be more helpful. Leading to grouping of mails compactly in hierarchically nested organized tree outline view, somewhat like this: # grouping based on the other person we are dealing with (similar to contacts in chat apps - Skype's recent, whatsapp) ## list of all threads inside this group ### All mails in that thread with options somewhere maybe in context menu to collapse expand levels, so obviously the default view is collapsed showing the contact name, subject, snippet-(if enabled) I guess this option is partially available in MS outlook in activity section, but it provides one group at a time and there is no overview. Also like grouping in file manager (windows explorer) where it shows all items in groups all at a time. I don't want anything to be left for doubt, so here is an example of Organized listing of mails, Expanded view: (nested line folding anyone?!) # person 1 ## thread topic: subject line 1 ### mail 1 ### mail 2 ## thread topic: subject line 2 ### mail 1 ### mail 2 ### mail 3 ... # person 2 ## thread topic: subject line 1 ### mail 1 ### mail 2 ### mail 3 ## thread topic: subject line 2 ### mail 1 ### mail 2 ### mail 3 ## thread topic: subject line 3 ### mail 1 ### mail 2 ... # person 3 ## thread topic: subject line 1 ### mail 1 ### mail 2 ## thread topic: subject line 2 ### mail 1 ### mail 2 ### mail 3 ### mail 4 ### mail 5 ... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Can't delete messages SM 2.33
Hi, dirk a écrit le 21/03/2015 11:19 : I have multiple email accounts, but since this mornig, for some reason, I can't delete messages from one of the accounts anymore. What can I do to fix it? You may have to repair the folder where messages don't disappear. -- Sorry for possible mistakes in English! http://pasdenom.info/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey on Mac: Toolbar unresponsive
ismand...@hotmail.com wrote: Using SM 2.13.2 on Mac OS X 10.5.8 (the last supported version for Mac Leopard). Every so often the top toolbar freezes and becomes unresponsive. The only way for me to reactivate it is to restart SM. The right-hand toolbar (clock, Spotlight etc.) is not affected. Any ideas? Does it correct itself if you wait long enough? I encounter cases here with SM on linux mint 17.1 Rebecca x64 where the visible tab/window in the browser and mail client cease to update. When this occurs I can click another tab and the title will change, but the contents of the tab will remain as is. If I click one of the drop-down menus the tab contents will be updated as the menu extends. I can close SM, but I can also simply work elsewhere for a while and the situation will clear itself up. I have posted about this on the newsgroup a few times, but it must be uncommon as I never get any responses to it. Perhaps what you are seeing is a similar problem. Dave ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Switching between SeaMonkey's e-mail client's tabs.
On 3/21/2015 5:11 AM, mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: Ant wrote: Hello. Is there a way to disable the annoying back to the top of the e-mail when switching to its tab that I scrolled down earlier? Thank you in advance. :) Is it that list of emails (thread pane) or the message shown in the message pane that you're trying to stop scrolling? That would be the e-mail (top left folder and server lists, right top is my message list, and bottom is my selected mail I am reading). The thread pane seems to scroll not necessarily to the top, but so that the message currently shown in the message pane is visible in the list. If you either hide the message pane, or select a message which is currently visible in the thread pane list, it doesn't scroll the thread pane when returning to the tab - may or may not be acceptable as a workaround. I can't quickly find a way to stop the message pane scrolling back to the top. It looks like this is already reported: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=541876 Similar issue on Thunderbird; may be shared code: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487386 Thanks! :) -- Allah's Apostle said, Once while a prophet amongst the prophets was taking a rest underneath a tree, an ant bit him. He, therefore, ordered that his luggage be taken away from underneath that tree and then ordered that the dwelling place of the ants should be set on fire. Allah sent him a revelation: 'Wouldn't it have been sufficient to burn a single ant (that bit you)?' --Translation of Sahih Bukhari, Book 54, Number 536 /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) / /\ /\ \Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net | |o o| | \ _ /If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link. ( ) Chop ANT from its address if e-mailing privately. Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.33 Dual core architecture
Historically SeaMonkey is a single process multithreaded application. With current versions the plugin container runs in a second process. The (in progress) Firefox Electrolysis (e10s) project moves Firefox to a multiprocess architecture. E10s is still a work in progress but if you turn it on, the contents of all the tabs run in a single separate process. Eventually each tab content may be a separate process. Each process runs on a single core. I don't know if Gecko implements it's own thread manager or uses OS threads. The OS may or may not run separate threads on separate execution units. The CPU may or may not be multithreaded. Intel high end CPUs are hyperthreaded. AMD Bulldozer modules are clustered multithreading. Thanks. When is this E10s supposed to be done? -- Every ruler sleeps on an anthill. --Afghani /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) / /\ /\ \Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net | |o o| | \ _ /If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link. ( ) Chop ANT from its address if e-mailing privately. Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.33 Dual core architecture
On 21/03/2015 01:06, Ant wrote: On 3/20/2015 2:03 AM, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote: stan wrote on 20/03/15 15:21: Does SM 2.33 support dual core architecture on Windows7 32 bit? I mean does it take advantage of the dual core by increasing a speed. Yep! Compared to single-cores and hard-drives, SM utilises multiprocessors and SSDs. Hmm, when SM hogs CPU, I only see a single core used? Maybe it is my very old, updated Windows XP Pro SP3? Historically SeaMonkey is a single process multithreaded application. With current versions the plugin container runs in a second process. The (in progress) Firefox Electrolysis (e10s) project moves Firefox to a multiprocess architecture. E10s is still a work in progress but if you turn it on, the contents of all the tabs run in a single separate process. Eventually each tab content may be a separate process. Each process runs on a single core. I don't know if Gecko implements it's own thread manager or uses OS threads. The OS may or may not run separate threads on separate execution units. The CPU may or may not be multithreaded. Intel high end CPUs are hyperthreaded. AMD Bulldozer modules are clustered multithreading. Phil -- Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Can't delete messages SM 2.33
I have multiple email accounts, but since this mornig, for some reason, I can't delete messages from one of the accounts anymore. What can I do to fix it? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
Eric wrote on 20/03/2015 17:56: Finally saw that Seamonkey got some recognition from PC Mag. http://www.pcworld.com/article/2898509/10-obscure-highly-specialized-browsers-that-will-make-you-forget-about-chrome-firefox-and-ie.html Bout time. Eric I did not see the seamonkey word on this page ... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
WaltS48 wrote on 21/03/2015 17:17: On 03/21/2015 12:03 PM, Ray_Net wrote: Eric wrote on 20/03/2015 17:56: Finally saw that Seamonkey got some recognition from PC Mag. http://www.pcworld.com/article/2898509/10-obscure-highly-specialized-browsers-that-will-make-you-forget-about-chrome-firefox-and-ie.html Bout time. Eric I did not see the seamonkey word on this page ... You need to learn how to navigate the site. Click the right facing arrow above the text 1 of 11. SeaMonkey is #7 of 11. OK, I see. thanks. I nerver use the maximized windows sot the arrows were missing :-) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
On 3/20/2015 6:12 PM, WaltS48 wrote: ... Nice article. Maybe SeaMonkey usage will bump up to 150,000 active daily installs. Who has access to the download and installation statistics? ;) -- I once heard the survivors of a colony of ants that had been partially obliterated by a cow's foot seriously debating the intention of the gods towards their civilization --Archy the Cockroach from Don Marquis' Archy and Mehitabel book (Certain Maxims of Archy poem) /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) / /\ /\ \Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net | |o o| | \ _ /If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link. ( ) Chop ANT from its address if e-mailing privately. Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Organised View of mails hierarchially: please make it more powerfully organised like tree view in file manager
feature of Outlook, I guess the limitation of one group at a time is to avoid the problem of how to deal with messages which appear in more than one group. # thread involving more than one other person: The mail can be showed in all the nodes of persons included in the mail using the 'labeling technique'. The item remains single but can be accessed and modified from all the included nodes. The feature is intelligently used by gmail and opera took it a step further by using labels as folders as well, so its both folders in tree view and also one item in as many places as you want by nesting labels. but if persons in the list are many, considering that Chat apps like Whatsapp Skype are handling it well by manual creation of 'multi-contact group', similarly multi-addressed threads can be given Auto-generated name making group of persons. The objective is plain: **chat apps have made it simple, reduced information overload and helped us stay on top of situation by giving a good overview**. If even if this is not possible then maybe 'mail summaries' can have section listing persons based on recency such that each person's only latest mail is displayed. If we want to see all the mails of that person similar to expanding that person's node to all threads with that person, then we can use search and filter that person's mails instead. # the option partially available in MS outlook in activity section, but without overview: in order to access it first a contact vcard is opened, then in the contact ribbon in show pane clicking 'Activities' displays all items such as mails, contacts, upcoming appointments, etc. with that person. # grouping in file manager (windows explorer) where it shows all items in groups all at a time. There, each file or folder clearly falls into one group. You don't get a file with a name beginning with both A and G, or with a size both greater than 1MB and less than 1MB, etc. But you can have an email thread containing messages from both person 1 and person 3. By allowing it to appear in both the nodes of person 1 person 3; similar to labeling if there are many persons then there can be an option to view only contacts in address book or to completely disable this feature. The bottomline is to borrow the feature refined to perfection by chat apps. Like Skype, Whatsapp, messenger ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
On 03/21/2015 12:03 PM, Ray_Net wrote: Eric wrote on 20/03/2015 17:56: Finally saw that Seamonkey got some recognition from PC Mag. http://www.pcworld.com/article/2898509/10-obscure-highly-specialized-browsers-that-will-make-you-forget-about-chrome-firefox-and-ie.html Bout time. Eric I did not see the seamonkey word on this page ... You need to learn how to navigate the site. Click the right facing arrow above the text 1 of 11. SeaMonkey is #7 of 11. -- Kubuntu 14.10 | KDE 4.14.1 | Thunderbird 38.0a2(Earlybird) [Coexist - Understanding Across Divides](https://www.coexist.org/) Obeying the law matters ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
Item # 7 SeaMonkey Underpinnings: Gecko Focus: old-school all-in-one Internet suite SeaMonkey has been around for nearly ten years, and it’s still going strong—but SeaMonkey is an ideal choice only for hardcore web users who want almost everything you could possibly think of in one package. SeaMonkey integrates a browser, an email client, a RSS and newsgroup client, an HTML editor, and an IRC client. The only thing missing from this suite is the ability to download torrents… but you can get that as an add-on. - Original Message - From: Ray_Net tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2015 4:03:14 PM Subject: Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag Eric wrote on 20/03/2015 17:56: Finally saw that Seamonkey got some recognition from PC Mag. http://www.pcworld.com/article/2898509/10-obscure-highly-specialized-browsers-that-will-make-you-forget-about-chrome-firefox-and-ie.html Bout time. Eric I did not see the seamonkey word on this page ... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Can't delete messages SM 2.33
Yamo' schreef: Hi, dirk a écrit le 21/03/2015 11:19 : I have multiple email accounts, but since this mornig, for some reason, I can't delete messages from one of the accounts anymore. What can I do to fix it? You may have to repair the folder where messages don't disappear. OK, maybe, but how? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey/Mozilla Page Display
Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote on 21/03/15 14:56: NoOp wrote on 21/03/15 13:17: Why is it that SeaMonkey and Firefox do not display this webpage properly? http://www.taintedwine.com/test-results Screenshots: SeaMonkey 2.33: http://postimg.org/image/5h0nnnse3/ Firefox 36.0.3 http://postimg.org/image/5fqpu8qkb/ Same link with: Ephiphany Browser: http://postimg.org/image/uvz6kf6gr/ Opera Browser: http://postimg.org/image/ht3k15g8r/ and of course Chrome Chromium as the same. https://www.flickr.com/photos/64156765@N03/16878470132/ confirming displaced layout in build:- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:39.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/39.0 SeaMonkey/2.36a1 ID:20150311081138 CSet: d4d00354095f Same results in tonight's build. (Correct layout in Epiphany). 12 Errors, 1 warning(s) to line#291, where W3.org validator, warns cannot recover after last error. Any further errors will be ignored http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.taintedwine.com%2Ftest-results+charset=%28detect+automatically%29doctype=Inlinegroup=0 Page claims to be written primarily for standards-compliant WebKit. It renders okay in WebKit browsers, and not in Gecko browsers? Rubbish page, or Gecko and Webkit are diverging from the common standard? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Can't delete messages SM 2.33
You may want to check this site out, it is written for Thunderbird however, it is the same for Seamonkey. The link: click here http://email.about.com/od/mozillathunderbirdtips/qt/How-To-Repair-Folders-In-Mozilla-Thunderbird.htm dirk wrote: I have multiple email accounts, but since this mornig, for some reason, I can't delete messages from one of the accounts anymore. What can I do to fix it? Yamo' wrote: Hi, dirk a écrit le 21/03/2015 11:19 : I have multiple email accounts, but since this mornig, for some reason, I can't delete messages from one of the accounts anymore. What can I do to fix it? You may have to repair the folder where messages don't disappear. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey/Mozilla Page Display
On 03/21/2015 09:09 AM, mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: NoOp wrote: Why is it that SeaMonkey and Firefox do not display this webpage properly? http://www.taintedwine.com/test-results Screenshots: SeaMonkey 2.33: http://postimg.org/image/5h0nnnse3/ Firefox 36.0.3 http://postimg.org/image/5fqpu8qkb/ Same link with: Ephiphany Browser: http://postimg.org/image/uvz6kf6gr/ Opera Browser: http://postimg.org/image/ht3k15g8r/ and of course Chrome Chromium as the same. There are 12 errors in the HTML, at least one of which involves a stylesheet so it's possible that some browsers don't read that stylesheet at all, and 128 errors in the CSS itself. For those interested, these can be checked at http://validator.w3.org/ and https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/ While it's not unusual for pages to contain a lot of errors against the standards and still work in practice on most browsers, it shouldn't be surprising that they might behave differently in some browsers. That's not to say handling of erroneous pages couldn't or shouldn't be improved - just that it's possibly the reason for the difference. From Barry's responses it looks like the current development version has improved handling of this case. Mark. The background for the Brand appears a bit darker in my Firefox 36.0.1, than my SeaMonkey 2.33 and Chromium 41.0.2272.76. I barely notice a difference putting them side by side. Is that the complaint? -- Kubuntu 14.10 | KDE 4.14.1 | Thunderbird 38.0a2(Earlybird) [Coexist - Understanding Across Divides](https://www.coexist.org/) Obeying the law matters ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey/Mozilla Page Display
WaltS48 wrote: On 03/21/2015 09:09 AM, mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: NoOp wrote: Why is it that SeaMonkey and Firefox do not display this webpage properly? http://www.taintedwine.com/test-results Screenshots: SeaMonkey 2.33: http://postimg.org/image/5h0nnnse3/ Firefox 36.0.3 http://postimg.org/image/5fqpu8qkb/ Same link with: Ephiphany Browser: http://postimg.org/image/uvz6kf6gr/ Opera Browser: http://postimg.org/image/ht3k15g8r/ and of course Chrome Chromium as the same. There are 12 errors in the HTML, at least one of which involves a stylesheet so it's possible that some browsers don't read that stylesheet at all, and 128 errors in the CSS itself. For those interested, these can be checked at http://validator.w3.org/ and https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/ While it's not unusual for pages to contain a lot of errors against the standards and still work in practice on most browsers, it shouldn't be surprising that they might behave differently in some browsers. That's not to say handling of erroneous pages couldn't or shouldn't be improved - just that it's possibly the reason for the difference. From Barry's responses it looks like the current development version has improved handling of this case. Mark. The background for the Brand appears a bit darker in my Firefox 36.0.1, than my SeaMonkey 2.33 and Chromium 41.0.2272.76. I barely notice a difference putting them side by side. Is that the complaint? From NoOp's screenshots, SeaMonkey and Firefox show the headers and introductory text centred, there is no menu, and the sort by options to the left of the table. Ephiphany and Opera show the headers and intro left aligned, menu to the right of the header and the sort options above the table. So a bit more than just a slightly different colour. For what it's worth, I just tried that page in a few browsers on Windows Vista: - Internet Explorer 9.0: Header is completely screwed (logo image is displayed without scaling and styling, menu is a bullet list of links). Intro and table look similar to NoOp's screenshots from Ephiphany and Opera. - Chrome 41.0.2272.89: Looks similar to NoOp's screenshots from Ephiphany and Opera. - SeaMonkey 2.33: Headers and intro look similar to NoOp's screenshots from Ephiphany and Opera, but the sort options and table look similar to NoOp's screenshot from SeaMonkey. So it seems to vary between browsers and even for the same browser on different OSs... Mark. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Can't delete messages SM 2.33
dirk schreef: I have multiple email accounts, but since this mornig, for some reason, I can't delete messages from one of the accounts anymore. What can I do to fix it? I have to add, that the map TRASH is disappeared in the account view.. besides that I noticed that many messages in the RECEIVED MAIL map are dissappeared as well help ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Mail File Save As uses Open dialog
Bit of a strange one... From Mail News, if I view a message in the message pane, and select File Save As File, the OS's File OPEN dialog is called, and gives a file not found error if I specify a filename which doesn't already exist. If I select a file which does already exist and click Open, it overwrites the file without warning. If I double-click the message to open it in a separate window, and select File Save As File from there, it works as expected - the OS's File SAVE AS dialog is called, allows a non-existent file to be selected, and prompts to overwrite if an existing file is specified. SeaMonkey 2.33 on Windows Vista. Can anyone else confirm this? A quick search of Bugzilla didn't turn anything up, so I'll investigate further and file a bug if others also see this. Thanks, Mark. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey/Mozilla Page Display
On 03/21/2015 10:09 AM, mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: WaltS48 wrote: On 03/21/2015 09:09 AM, mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: NoOp wrote: Why is it that SeaMonkey and Firefox do not display this webpage properly? http://www.taintedwine.com/test-results Screenshots: SeaMonkey 2.33: http://postimg.org/image/5h0nnnse3/ Firefox 36.0.3 http://postimg.org/image/5fqpu8qkb/ Same link with: Ephiphany Browser: http://postimg.org/image/uvz6kf6gr/ Opera Browser: http://postimg.org/image/ht3k15g8r/ and of course Chrome Chromium as the same. There are 12 errors in the HTML, at least one of which involves a stylesheet so it's possible that some browsers don't read that stylesheet at all, and 128 errors in the CSS itself. For those interested, these can be checked at http://validator.w3.org/ and https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/ While it's not unusual for pages to contain a lot of errors against the standards and still work in practice on most browsers, it shouldn't be surprising that they might behave differently in some browsers. That's not to say handling of erroneous pages couldn't or shouldn't be improved - just that it's possibly the reason for the difference. From Barry's responses it looks like the current development version has improved handling of this case. Mark. The background for the Brand appears a bit darker in my Firefox 36.0.1, than my SeaMonkey 2.33 and Chromium 41.0.2272.76. I barely notice a difference putting them side by side. Is that the complaint? From NoOp's screenshots, SeaMonkey and Firefox show the headers and introductory text centred, there is no menu, and the sort by options to the left of the table. Ephiphany and Opera show the headers and intro left aligned, menu to the right of the header and the sort options above the table. So a bit more than just a slightly different colour. For what it's worth, I just tried that page in a few browsers on Windows Vista: - Internet Explorer 9.0: Header is completely screwed (logo image is displayed without scaling and styling, menu is a bullet list of links). Intro and table look similar to NoOp's screenshots from Ephiphany and Opera. - Chrome 41.0.2272.89: Looks similar to NoOp's screenshots from Ephiphany and Opera. - SeaMonkey 2.33: Headers and intro look similar to NoOp's screenshots from Ephiphany and Opera, but the sort options and table look similar to NoOp's screenshot from SeaMonkey. So it seems to vary between browsers and even for the same browser on different OSs... Mark. I see! Much ado about nothing again. -- Kubuntu 14.10 | KDE 4.14.1 | Thunderbird 38.0a2(Earlybird) [Coexist - Understanding Across Divides](https://www.coexist.org/) Obeying the law matters ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Can't delete messages SM 2.33
Danny Kile wrote: You may want to check this site out, it is written for Thunderbird however, it is the same for Seamonkey. The link: click here http://email.about.com/od/mozillathunderbirdtips/qt/How-To-Repair-Folders-In-Mozilla-Thunderbird.htm dirk wrote: I have multiple email accounts, but since this mornig, for some reason, I can't delete messages from one of the accounts anymore. What can I do to fix it? Yamo' wrote: Hi, dirk a écrit le 21/03/2015 11:19 : I have multiple email accounts, but since this mornig, for some reason, I can't delete messages from one of the accounts anymore. What can I do to fix it? You may have to repair the folder where messages don't disappear. Oops sorry for the top post, it's been awhile, I had a brain fart. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: PDF.js stopped working.
On 03/20/2015 09:51 PM, Ed Mullen wrote: EE wrote on 3/20/2015 12:58 PM: WaltS48 wrote: On 03/19/2015 08:09 PM, Cruz, Jaime wrote: Just noticed that the PDF.js extension no longer works, and there doesn't seem to be any newer version since it was rolled into Firefox. I tried disabling it, but instead of displaying the PDF in the browser, it offered to download it instead... :( Switch to Firefox. :) Use a helper application. I do that quite happily. It works. I don't understand why anyone would want a browser to render a .pdf file. Or a Word file. Or Excel file. I have native applications to handle all files. A browser is for rendering HTML files. I think it was a horrible idea to enable Firefox/SeaMonkey to render .pdf files. All it did was ask for trouble and apparently succesfully given all the issues with it. When I click a link to a .pdf in SeaMonkey or Firefox the file opens in my .pdf reader software. Why do millions of browser users use the Adobe Reader plugin to view PDFs in the browser? Do you do the same with Flash videos? So you would rather have users depend on security vulnerable plugins that users have to update too frequently, rather than built-in replacements that get updated regularly with improvements and security, and the user doesn't have to be bothered. Okay. -- Kubuntu 14.10 | KDE 4.14.1 | Thunderbird 38.0a2(Earlybird) [Coexist - Understanding Across Divides](https://www.coexist.org/) Obeying the law matters ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Organised View of mails hierarchially: please make it more powerfully organised like tree view in file manager
abdallah wrote: In the beginning the items in the list were just mails. Then they could be grouped of mails based on conversation (threaded view) So now if these 'many' conversations were regrouped based on the 'few' other person we are dealing, it would be more helpful. Leading to grouping of mails compactly in hierarchically nested organized tree outline view, somewhat like this: # grouping based on the other person we are dealing with (similar to contacts in chat apps - Skype's recent, whatsapp) ## list of all threads inside this group ### All mails in that thread What should happen when a thread involves more than one other person (e.g. person 1 and person 3 in your example below?) with options somewhere maybe in context menu to collapse expand levels, so obviously the default view is collapsed showing the contact name, subject, snippet-(if enabled) I guess this option is partially available in MS outlook in activity section, but it provides one group at a time and there is no overview. I'm not familiar with that feature of Outlook, but I guess the limitation of one group at a time is to avoid the problem of how to deal with messages which appear in more than one group. Also like grouping in file manager (windows explorer) where it shows all items in groups all at a time. There, each file or folder clearly falls into one group. You don't get a file with a name beginning with both A and G, or with a size both greater than 1MB and less than 1MB, etc. But you can have an email thread containing messages from both person 1 and person 3. I don't want anything to be left for doubt, so here is an example of Organized listing of mails, Expanded view: (nested line folding anyone?!) # person 1 ## thread topic: subject line 1 ### mail 1 ### mail 2 ## thread topic: subject line 2 ### mail 1 ### mail 2 ### mail 3 ... # person 2 ## thread topic: subject line 1 ### mail 1 ### mail 2 ### mail 3 ## thread topic: subject line 2 ### mail 1 ### mail 2 ### mail 3 ## thread topic: subject line 3 ### mail 1 ### mail 2 ... # person 3 ## thread topic: subject line 1 ### mail 1 ### mail 2 ## thread topic: subject line 2 ### mail 1 ### mail 2 ### mail 3 ### mail 4 ### mail 5 ... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey/Mozilla Page Display
NoOp wrote: Why is it that SeaMonkey and Firefox do not display this webpage properly? http://www.taintedwine.com/test-results Screenshots: SeaMonkey 2.33: http://postimg.org/image/5h0nnnse3/ Firefox 36.0.3 http://postimg.org/image/5fqpu8qkb/ Same link with: Ephiphany Browser: http://postimg.org/image/uvz6kf6gr/ Opera Browser: http://postimg.org/image/ht3k15g8r/ and of course Chrome Chromium as the same. There are 12 errors in the HTML, at least one of which involves a stylesheet so it's possible that some browsers don't read that stylesheet at all, and 128 errors in the CSS itself. For those interested, these can be checked at http://validator.w3.org/ and https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/ While it's not unusual for pages to contain a lot of errors against the standards and still work in practice on most browsers, it shouldn't be surprising that they might behave differently in some browsers. That's not to say handling of erroneous pages couldn't or shouldn't be improved - just that it's possibly the reason for the difference. From Barry's responses it looks like the current development version has improved handling of this case. Mark. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey on Mac: Toolbar unresponsive
On Saturday, March 21, 2015 at 7:59:24 AM UTC, Burry wrote: On 21.03.15 2:58, Iceman wrote: Using SM 2.13.2 on Mac OS X 10.5.8 (the last supported version for Mac Leopard). Every so often the top toolbar freezes and becomes unresponsive. The only way for me to reactivate it is to restart SM. The right-hand toolbar (clock, Spotlight etc.) is not affected. Any ideas? Starting taskmanager sometimes un-freezes my mouse. Just with ctrl/alt/del start it. Thanks for that, but the mouse/pointer is OK. And there is no ctrl/alt/del on Mac (I, BTW, am using MacBook). ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Switching between SeaMonkey's e-mail client's tabs.
Ant wrote: Hello. Is there a way to disable the annoying back to the top of the e-mail when switching to its tab that I scrolled down earlier? Thank you in advance. :) Is it that list of emails (thread pane) or the message shown in the message pane that you're trying to stop scrolling? The thread pane seems to scroll not necessarily to the top, but so that the message currently shown in the message pane is visible in the list. If you either hide the message pane, or select a message which is currently visible in the thread pane list, it doesn't scroll the thread pane when returning to the tab - may or may not be acceptable as a workaround. I can't quickly find a way to stop the message pane scrolling back to the top. It looks like this is already reported: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=541876 Similar issue on Thunderbird; may be shared code: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487386 Mark. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey/Mozilla Page Display
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: NoOp wrote: Why is it that SeaMonkey and Firefox do not display this webpage properly? http://www.taintedwine.com/test-results Screenshots: SeaMonkey 2.33: http://postimg.org/image/5h0nnnse3/ Firefox 36.0.3 http://postimg.org/image/5fqpu8qkb/ Same link with: Ephiphany Browser: http://postimg.org/image/uvz6kf6gr/ Opera Browser: http://postimg.org/image/ht3k15g8r/ and of course Chrome Chromium as the same. There are 12 errors in the HTML, at least one of which involves a stylesheet so it's possible that some browsers don't read that stylesheet at all, and 128 errors in the CSS itself. For those interested, these can be checked at http://validator.w3.org/ and https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/ While it's not unusual for pages to contain a lot of errors against the standards and still work in practice on most browsers, it shouldn't be surprising that they might behave differently in some browsers. That's not to say handling of erroneous pages couldn't or shouldn't be improved - just that it's possibly the reason for the difference. From Barry's responses it looks like the current development version has improved handling of this case. Mark. Why are there two lists with SeaMonkey, but not with Safari (Webkit)? The first list is not in alphabetical order and is shifted over, and the second list is fine and in alphabetical order. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Can't delete messages SM 2.33
Danny Kile schreef: You may want to check this site out, it is written for Thunderbird however, it is the same for Seamonkey. The link: click here http://email.about.com/od/mozillathunderbirdtips/qt/How-To-Repair-Folders-In-Mozilla-Thunderbird.htm dirk wrote: I have multiple email accounts, but since this mornig, for some reason, I can't delete messages from one of the accounts anymore. What can I do to fix it? Yamo' wrote: Hi, dirk a écrit le 21/03/2015 11:19 : I have multiple email accounts, but since this mornig, for some reason, I can't delete messages from one of the accounts anymore. What can I do to fix it? You may have to repair the folder where messages don't disappear. thank, I did that, but there was only a file called trash.msf, NO file trash (without the extention). What to do? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Can't delete messages SM 2.33
Yamo' wrote: Hi, dirk a écrit le 21/03/2015 11:19 : I have multiple email accounts, but since this mornig, for some reason, I can't delete messages from one of the accounts anymore. What can I do to fix it? You may have to repair the folder where messages don't disappear. Do you compact your folders frequently? You should do that to keep things working properly. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Lightning in SeaMonkey 2.33
On 03/20/2015 04:58 PM, mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: Rob Steinmetz wrote: I just upgraded to 2.33 and Lightning is broke, at least on my computer. I upgraded to Lightning 3.8b2 and nothing works. I tried the calendar.icaljs fix posed elsewhere but it was already set to false. Any ideas I don't seem to be alone but it is apparently somewhat random. Works fine for me - SeaMonkey 2.33 and Lightning 3.8b2 on Windows Vista. What does nothing works mean? Does SeaMonkey not even start with Lightning installed? Does it start but crash immediately? Does SeaMonkey start OK, but there's no Events and Tasks menu in mail news? Does Lightning show up in the Extensions section of add-ons manager? Does that give any clues as to why its not working (e.g. it might be disabled)? Mark. Seamonkey works as usual however whenever the calendar or tasks tabs is open the toll bar is greyed out and the calendar pane is blank, no dates or events. When I receive an invitation by email it does not open or get makes as read. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
On 22/03/2015 00:33, Ant wrote: On 3/20/2015 6:12 PM, WaltS48 wrote: ... Nice article. Maybe SeaMonkey usage will bump up to 150,000 active daily installs. Who has access to the download and installation statistics? ;) 1. Go: https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/StatusMeetings/2015-03-17#2.x_.28Last.2C_Current.2C_Next.29 2. Click on the dataviz link. Phil -- Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Can't delete messages SM 2.33
dirk wrote: dirk schreef: I have multiple email accounts, but since this mornig, for some reason, I can't delete messages from one of the accounts anymore. What can I do to fix it? I have to add, that the map TRASH is disappeared in the account view.. besides that I noticed that many messages in the RECEIVED MAIL map are dissappeared as well help http://kb.mozillazine.org/Disappearing_mail http://kb.mozillazine.org/Keep_it_working_-_Thunderbird The latter link also applies to SeaMonkey. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey/Mozilla Page Display
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: WaltS48 wrote: On 03/21/2015 09:09 AM, mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: NoOp wrote: Why is it that SeaMonkey and Firefox do not display this webpage properly? http://www.taintedwine.com/test-results Screenshots: SeaMonkey 2.33: http://postimg.org/image/5h0nnnse3/ Firefox 36.0.3 http://postimg.org/image/5fqpu8qkb/ Same link with: Ephiphany Browser: http://postimg.org/image/uvz6kf6gr/ Opera Browser: http://postimg.org/image/ht3k15g8r/ and of course Chrome Chromium as the same. There are 12 errors in the HTML, at least one of which involves a stylesheet so it's possible that some browsers don't read that stylesheet at all, and 128 errors in the CSS itself. For those interested, these can be checked at http://validator.w3.org/ and https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/ While it's not unusual for pages to contain a lot of errors against the standards and still work in practice on most browsers, it shouldn't be surprising that they might behave differently in some browsers. That's not to say handling of erroneous pages couldn't or shouldn't be improved - just that it's possibly the reason for the difference. From Barry's responses it looks like the current development version has improved handling of this case. Mark. The background for the Brand appears a bit darker in my Firefox 36.0.1, than my SeaMonkey 2.33 and Chromium 41.0.2272.76. I barely notice a difference putting them side by side. Is that the complaint? From NoOp's screenshots, SeaMonkey and Firefox show the headers and introductory text centred, there is no menu, and the sort by options to the left of the table. Ephiphany and Opera show the headers and intro left aligned, menu to the right of the header and the sort options above the table. So a bit more than just a slightly different colour. For what it's worth, I just tried that page in a few browsers on Windows Vista: - Internet Explorer 9.0: Header is completely screwed (logo image is displayed without scaling and styling, menu is a bullet list of links). Intro and table look similar to NoOp's screenshots from Ephiphany and Opera. - Chrome 41.0.2272.89: Looks similar to NoOp's screenshots from Ephiphany and Opera. - SeaMonkey 2.33: Headers and intro look similar to NoOp's screenshots from Ephiphany and Opera, but the sort options and table look similar to NoOp's screenshot from SeaMonkey. So it seems to vary between browsers and even for the same browser on different OSs... Mark. The buttons or links, whichever they are, to the right of the page title work with both SeaMonkey and Safari, so that is not a problem. The displacement of the list is a problem, and there are two lists with SeaMonkey. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
I use Lightning 3.8b2 with SM 2.33
Thee Chicago Wolf (MVP) wrote: Extensions with binary components such as Lightning, … only work on certain platforms (e.g. Windows). Furthermore they need to be adjusted for each new SeaMonkey release, which also means that an old version of such an add-on can break SeaMonkey if you disabled compatibility checking (which e.g. happens when you install the Add-on Compatibility Reporter add-on). For Lightning, please check the Stable Releases section on the Calendar Versions page… https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Calendar/Calendar_Versions#Stable_Releases So I should use Lightning version 3.8b2 (Doesn't the b stand for beta?) If you're on SM 2.33 then use Lightning 3.9b. No. As the Calendar Versions page (URL above) shows: For SM 2.33 use Lightning 3.8b2. There is no need to try other versions with SM 2.33. Investing your time in error checking would give better results than installing Add-ons which are binary incompatible to your SM version. Hb ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Does anyone use Lightning?
Ronnie wrote: I had to stay with the current stable version 3.3.3 to keep lightbird working. The new one causes all kinda of goofy stuff going on. I emailed the developer and informed them about then newer versions causing issue. The Lightbird Version Issue was fixed yesterday, see https://github.com/Exalm/lightbird/issues/13#event-260521431 So you might want to use the current SM 2.33 an Lightning 2.8b2 Hb ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Does anyone use Lightning?
Thanks and yes he emailed me when he updated them, I have been speaking with the dev on a few occasions and a he is also on our rotation donation, we are encouraging him to stay active on seamonkey development and is next on the list to receive a split. We are dead serious about pushing SeaMonkey development and providing support where we can. ~Ronnie Hb wrote: Ronnie wrote: I had to stay with the current stable version 3.3.3 to keep lightbird working. The new one causes all kinda of goofy stuff going on. I emailed the developer and informed them about then newer versions causing issue. The Lightbird Version Issue was fixed yesterday, see https://github.com/Exalm/lightbird/issues/13#event-260521431 So you might want to use the current SM 2.33 an Lightning 2.8b2 Hb ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
Geoff Welsh wrote: I maximized the window to get the arrows, but they only work twice then stop. Slide-shows have to be the absolute dumbest thing a page designer can do. Funny, I saw all 11 without difficulty, once I figured out what to do. Win7 Pro SP1, SM 2.33. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Finally Seamonkey is Recognized by PC Mag
Ray_Net wrote: WaltS48 wrote on 21/03/2015 17:17: On 03/21/2015 12:03 PM, Ray_Net wrote: Eric wrote on 20/03/2015 17:56: Finally saw that Seamonkey got some recognition from PC Mag. http://www.pcworld.com/article/2898509/10-obscure-highly-specialized-browsers-that-will-make-you-forget-about-chrome-firefox-and-ie.html Bout time. Eric I did not see the seamonkey word on this page ... You need to learn how to navigate the site. Click the right facing arrow above the text 1 of 11. SeaMonkey is #7 of 11. OK, I see. thanks. I nerver use the maximized windows sot the arrows were missing :-) I maximized the window to get the arrows, but they only work twice then stop. Slide-shows have to be the absolute dumbest thing a page designer can do. GW OS X, SM 2.34a1 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey on Mac: Toolbar unresponsive
ismand...@hotmail.com wrote: Using SM 2.13.2 on Mac OS X 10.5.8 (the last supported version for Mac Leopard). Every so often the top toolbar freezes and becomes unresponsive. The only way for me to reactivate it is to restart SM. The right-hand toolbar (clock, Spotlight etc.) is not affected. Any ideas? you must have an Intel machine? I have a PPC running OSX 10.5.8 and the last SM for /this/ is SM 2.0.14, but I have never run into that problem. Obviously the solution is to use these old machines as sparingly as possible. I have an extremely short list of web sites I will dare load, that I already know will NOT lock everything up or crash SM, and just use this machine when my modern Mac has killed the battery (due to too much Flash on some web page, no doubt). GW ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
What Are These SQLITE Files?
There are several fairly large sqlite files in my profile. One I recognize; the others no. Can someone please help me know what these are, and their importance? They are: -- cookies.sqlite (I know about this one) -- cookies.sqlite.bak -- cookies.sqlite.bak-rebuild -- cookies.sqlite-wal -- webappsstore.sqlite All advice greatly appreciated. Larry S. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
