Re: SM2.46 default search engine problem
On 11/15/16 11:35 PM, cmcadams wrote: > I've just installed SM2.46, and discovered that the engine pick list in > > Edit > Preferences > Browser > Internet Search > > isn't working. I got my choice by deleting all the alternatives, which becomes > the new unchangeable option even if you then Restore Defaults. > > Not a killer, because it can be gotten around, but still annoying. > > User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0 > SeaMonkey/2.46 WFM. Can't reproduce here User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.46 -- 73 de Ed, W3BNR "Introducing 'Lite' - The new way to spell 'Light', but with twenty per cent fewer letters." -Jerry Seinfeld (1954-) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey
On 11/14/16 9:15 AM, TCW wrote: > On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 00:19:17 +0100, Mason83 wrote: > >> On 12/11/2016 10:06, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: >> >>> I would either grab the 2.46 en-US release candidate or use one of >>> Adrians unofficial versions till the official shows up. There are all >>> great compared to 2.40. >> I tried upgrading to Adrian's 2.46 release, but it borked my prefs.js >> so I had to revert back to 2.40 using a backup :-( >> >> Regards. > My hunch is going from 2.40 to 2.46 did it. There have been some > usable builds in between then but it was likely due to something else. > I've been using all the interim builds after 2.40 to, presently, 2.47 > beta. Nothing weird happened between then and now. I had no problems going from 2.40 (32 bit) to 2.46 (64 bit) on Windows10. Been using 2.46 for better than a month with no problems. -- 73 de Ed, W3BNR "If a man wants his dreams to come true, he must wake up." -Anonymous ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Bug 1308923 - Opening new e-mail compose window crashes (WIN 10?)
Works fine in 64bit SM 2.46 Windows 10 User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.46 -- 73 de Ed, W3BNR "War creates peace like hate creates love." -David L. Wilson ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: What's a good signature randomizer for 64-bit Windows 7
On 10/23/16 1:28 PM, Ant wrote: > On 10/23/2016 9:18 AM, W3BNR wrote: >> On 10/23/16 11:42 AM, Ed Mullen wrote: >>> On 10/23/2016 at 3:21 AM, Ant's prodigious digits fired off: >>>> I used to use Pick-a-Tag, but I don't have its installer anymore and it >>>> leaks memory. :( >>>> >>>> Thank you in advance. :) >>> >>> Been using PAT for years. Never seen any memory leakage. >>> >>> <http://edmullen.net/mozilla/moz_sigtag.php> >>> >>> Tagzilla is another: >>> >>> <http://tagzilla.mozdev.org/> >>> >> Likewise. PAT still working fine with Windows 10, and SeaMonkey. > > Awesome, Ed. I am glad you still have the installer for me to reinstall > again. :D Responded directly. -- 73 de Ed, W3BNR "If you pick up a dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man." -Mark Twain (1835-1910) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: What's a good signature randomizer for 64-bit Windows 7
On 10/23/16 11:42 AM, Ed Mullen wrote: On 10/23/2016 at 3:21 AM, Ant's prodigious digits fired off: I used to use Pick-a-Tag, but I don't have its installer anymore and it leaks memory. :( Thank you in advance. :) Been using PAT for years. Never seen any memory leakage. Tagzilla is another: Likewise. PAT still working fine with Windows 10, and SeaMonkey. -- 73 de Ed, W3BNR "Government is the great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else." ~Frederic Bastiat, French Economist (1801-1850) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is there a way to see what is still being downloaded on the current web page?
On 08/23/16 4:23 PM, Ant wrote: > Once in a while, I noticed SeaMonkey/SM is still downloading parts of the web > page. I'd like to know what server(s) and contents SM is still waiting for. I > was hoping page info(rmation) would tell me this, but it doesn't. :( > > Thank you in advance. :) Status bar at bottom of window to the right of the "Address Book" icon. -- 47 & 73 de Ed, W3BNR "Generally the theories we believe we call facts, and the facts we disbelieve we call theories."-Felix S. Cohen (1907-1953) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 2.48a1 64bit (and 2.47a1 32-bit), win10 and task bar "image" never stops - spinner always present
On 08/16/16 6:22 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: > Will not be fixed for 2.44. Fixed for 2.45 and up as of 08/11. > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 16:49:20 -0400, W3BNR wrote: > >>> I confirm this with: >>> User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:47.0) >>> Gecko/20100101 >>> Firefox/47.0 SeaMonkey/2.44 >>> Build identifier: 20160608085536 > > > Regards > Frank-Rainer Grahl > > Thank you - downloaded and installed 2.45. User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:48.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/48.0 SeaMonkey/2.45 Build identifier: 20160812205144 -- 73 de Ed, W3BNR "I bring you a warning. Every one of you listening to my voice, tell the world. Tell this to everybody wherever they are: watch the skies, everywhere. Keep looking. Keep watching the skies!" -Ned 'Scotty' Scott in "The Thing From Another World" (1951) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 2.48a1 64bit (and 2.47a1 32-bit), win10 and task bar "image" never stops - spinner always present
On 08/14/16 12:50 AM, djc wrote:
I am experimenting with the latest Seamonkey releases,
but don't know the best words to use for a bugzilla search. I
presume this has been reported.
The images for the browser pages on the task bar never settle -
they always show the "spinning" circle. Mailer (newsgroups) is OK.
Firefox 48 is OK.
This happens with both 2.47a1 32 bit and 2.48a1 64 bit, win 10
Anniversary release (Windows 10 Home 1607 Release).
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:51.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/51.0 SeaMonkey/2.48a1
Build identifier: 20160807152714
Can anyone provide me with either the appropriate key words or a
even a bug number? I'm ahppy to try to raise a bug.
djc
I confirm this with:
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:47.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/47.0 SeaMonkey/2.44
Build identifier: 20160608085536
--
Ed, W3BNR
You do not need a parachute to skydive.
You only need a parachute to skydive twice.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Using windows 10 SM works OK but - Mail Problem
On 08/02/16 7:20 AM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: Hi, can someone reproduce "Bug 1291186 - Tagged Email: highlighting does not change to Tag color when tagged mail es selected, text more or less unreadable" ? Best Regards Rainer Bielefeld (SeaMonkey QA volunteer) Unable to reproduce with User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:47.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/47.0 SeaMonkey/2.44 -- 47 & 73 de Ed, W3BNR "Conservative, n: A statesman who is enamored of existing evils, as distinguished from the Liberal who wishes to replace them with others." -Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Sea Monkey and Windows 10
On 07/19/16 7:21 AM, Jim Taylor wrote: > Daniel wrote: >> Hmm! Jim, in my Win7 install, when I click on either of your >> about:profiles above, I get a >> >> Invalid Address >> >> The URL is not valid and cannot be loaded. >> >> What am I doing wrong?? (By-the-By, at installation, I have done a >> "Custom" Installation, placing my profile on my E:\ drive, although I >> would expect this to affect SeaMonkey, as it still works with my >> selected profile!!) >> > > Sorry I'm using 2.45a1 and didn't realize about:profiles wasn't in the current > release. Just checked my Win. 10 machine running 2.40 and it isn't there. > Not sure when it was added, looks like maybe > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1179129 added it. > > Jim It is in SM 2.44 x64 Build identifier: 20160608085536 -- 47 & 73 de Ed, W3BNR "All that is necessary for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing." -Edmund Burke (1729-1797) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is there a way to remove big images in sent HTML e-mails?
On 06/13/16 11:02 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:
On 6/13/2016 at 5:22 AM, Ant's fingers rattled off:
...
True. Of course there is another way.
SeaMonkey uses mbox format to the
mail folder is just one big text file. Your can search and
cutout the
base64 encoded image out of the message. If sone this in the
past to fix
corrupted mail accounts. I made perl scripts that deconstruct
mbox file
into individual eml files, then I could tweak afflicted
emails, and then
reconstruct eml files back into the mbox file.
Wouldn't that be huge in a text editor if the images like MB
big?
Well EditPad Pro can handle that:
"EditPad Pro 7 can edit files that are larger than 2 GB, even on a
32-bit PC with less than 2 GB of RAM. The (theoretical) maximum
sizes are now 9 billion GB (263 bytes) per file, 2 billion lines
per file, and 2 billion bytes per line. In practice, on a modern
PC, EditPad Pro 7 performs well with files well over 10 GB,
millions of lines, and up to 100,000 characters per line."
As one who has used Edit Pad Pro for many years,
I'd be lost without it.
--
47 & 73 de Ed, W3BNR
"The course of history can be changed but not halted."
Paul Robeson (1898-1976)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: ABC News videos won't play
On 4/25/2016 12:32 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: > David E. Ross wrote: > >> On 4/24/2016 7:07 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: >>> >>> If I want to enable HTML5 media without installing PrefBar, do you know >>> a way? >>> >> >> There is nothing under [Edit > Preferences] to control HTML5 media. You >> will have to request about:config. The preference variable is >> media.autoplay.enabled. "True" enables it; "false" disables it. > > Already true by default, no help there. Thanks anyway. > Is media.webm.enabled set 'true'? -- Ed, W3BNR We make our future by the best use of the present. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Which SeaMonkey ?
On 12/31/2015 10:39 PM, DoctorBill wrote: > I have been messaging on this News Group about problems with SM and Windows XP > and quite a few of those here 'suggested' (lol) that I upgrade to a higher > version of Windows. I had to buy a newer computer - which I just did - a used > one with Windows 7 which I can get upgraded to Windows 10 should I choose. > > So - should I stay with Win 7 (which the Computer Store vendor suggests) or go > to Windows 10 (free upgrade). > > If I stay with Windows 7 - is any particular SM version better with 7 ? > If I go for Windows 10, is there a better SM version for THAT !? > > I understand that going for Windows 10 means that I HAVE to let Microsoft get > into my pants 100% > I was told you HAVE to give them access to everything you do on that computer > to > even use the program. User agreement. > > DoctorBill > I upgraded to WIN 10 in September. Configured it to show GUI as in the past. Program icons that looked like they did on 7 and XP with no problems. I run only programs that were designed for the 'home COMPUTER' not I-xxx's and Androids. For 'APPS' I use my i-Phone and/or i-Pad. Not my COMPUTER. So what do you need, a COMPUTER or an APP machine? You make the decision. -- Ed, W3BNR HTTP://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR Tags by Pick-a-Tag 1.60ß1 "It is not what you have that matters, it is what you do with what you have. - Sir Winfred Grenfell (1865-1940) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: TagZilla
On 12/4/2015 2:16 PM, JAS wrote: > Will there ever be a chance that TagZilla will be able to be fixed to work > in the current versions of Seamonkey or Thunderbird. It worked for me up to > 2.32.1 but now that I just upgraded to 2.39 it is broken. I knew it would be. > > Thanks, > > JAS Use Pick-A-Tag version 1.60b1 as a replacement for TagZilla. http://jonesfarm.us/w3bnr/pat160b1.zip -- Ed, W3BNR HTTP://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR Tags by Pick-a-Tag 1.60ß1 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
System Requirements
Just noticed that under System Requirements at: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/system-requirements under "Windows"/"Operating Systems" Windows 10 is not listed. Yes, Sea Monkey IS working with Windows 10. -- Ed, W3BNR HTTP://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR Tags by Pick-a-Tag 1.60ß1 "The beginning is the most important part of the work." -Plato (428BC-348BC) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Using Mozbackup 1.5.1 for Seamonkey 2.38 on a Win 10 PC
On 10/11/2015 5:41 PM, hg...@roadrunner.com wrote: > Mozbackup worked perfectly with Win 7, but now that I've upgraded to Win 10, > Mozbackup gives me an error message after I try to back up that the backup I > created is not valid. Is there an update for Mozbackup that will help it work > with Win 10 or is there a workaround? Thanks > Seems to work ok using Win10, SM 2.38 and MozBackup 1.5.2beta. Upgraded to Win10 from Win7 -- Ed, W3BNR HTTP://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR Tags by Pick-a-Tag 1.60ß1 Don't vote--it only encourages them! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Which version will support Windows 10
On 10/11/2015 9:05 PM, stan pierce wrote: > I just downloaded 2.38. Is this the version that will support Windows 10? > Stan. Win 10 and SM 2.38 here. No problems, at least that I'm aware of. -- Ed, W3BNR HTTP://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR Tags by Pick-a-Tag 1.60ß1 "If you want to make enemies, try to change something. -President Wilson(1856-1924) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.38 & Display Mail User Agent
On 10/2/2015 4:28 PM, EE wrote: > W3BNR wrote: >> Win64, SM 2.38 and Display Mail User Agent 1.7.0. >> The add-on to display the the user agent seems to not be working. >> Any one else notice this? >> > It works sometimes. It is working with your message. Apparently, some mail > clients do not create something called a user-agent, and if the user-agent > does > not have that name, it will not be displayed. I also set up the headers to > show > the user-agent, but that also will not work to display something not > specifically called a "user-agent". > 'True, but I didn't see _any_ including SeaMonkey when I should have. Can't explain it. This one was *not* operator error. (:> -- Ed, W3BNR HTTP://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR Tags by Pick-a-Tag 1.60ß1 How do you press F1 when your PC has a keyboard error or no keyboard present? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.38 & Display Mail User Agent -Never mind
On 10/1/2015 8:06 PM, W3BNR wrote: > Win64, SM 2.38 and Display Mail User Agent 1.7.0. > The add-on to display the the user agent seems to not be working. > Any one else notice this? > Tested on other system and it works fine. Restarted SM and it working now. -- Ed, W3BNR HTTP://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR Tags by Pick-a-Tag 1.60ß1 Don't try to solve problems with the same thinking that created them. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
SeaMonkey 2.38 & Display Mail User Agent
Win64, SM 2.38 and Display Mail User Agent 1.7.0. The add-on to display the the user agent seems to not be working. Any one else notice this? -- Ed, W3BNR HTTP://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR Tags by Pick-a-Tag 1.60ß1 "The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help." -Ronald Reagan (1911-2004) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: MailwasherPro7&Sea Monkey
On 9/7/2015 5:06 PM, Ross Simon wrote: > Does anyone use mailwasher, if so do you have problems restoring Emails from > the > recycle bin? > > Ross Yes, version 7.5.0 with Windows 7. Been using MailWasher for quite some time. Both on Win 7 and XP. No problems restoring - at least on the times I've used the restore function. -- Ed, W3BNR HTTP://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR Tags by Pick-a-Tag 1.60ß1 "We are ready for an unforeseen event that may or may not occur." --Al Gore, Vice President (1948-) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Report Web Forgery Feature broken in contrib SM 2.38 20150813185242, works on contrib SM 2.37 20150816073637
On 8/17/2015 9:25 AM, Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP] wrote: > Just noticed that it's broken on 2.38 but does work on 2.37 from > https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/. > > - Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP] > Also broken in 2.35 -- Ed, W3BNR HTTP://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR Tags by Pick-a-Tag 1.60ß1 It's hard to make a comeback when you haven't been anywhere. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.35..
On 8/6/2015 8:44 AM, Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP] wrote: > On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 20:52:47 +1000, David Cox > wrote: > >> On 6/08/2015 6:18 AM, Rob Steinmetz wrote: >>> Edmund Wong wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I regret to be the bearer of bad news; but as it stands, >>>> the worst case scenario (and likely the actual case) is that 2.35 is >>>> not going to be released in July. >>>> >>>> The new goal is to release it in early August. >>>> >>>> The past month has been mired in fire-fighting bustages, >>>> getting repacks and builds working (as of this writing, >>>> trunk is busted) as well as the need to get the backend >>>> buildbot code updated to reflect that we no longer depend >>>> on CVS. >>>> >>>> I apologize for the delay and thank everyone for your >>>> patience. >>>> >>>> Edmund >>>> >>> Thanks for the update. At this point I'd rather wait until things get >>> sorted out than rush into an unstable situation. >> FWIW I've been running Callek's contributed win32 2.35 build for a >> couple of weeks with no issues. But then, I have a pretty simple setup >> with few addons but do mix POP and Imap mail servers. > > I was running that for a while with good luck as well. I've had good > luck with a 2.36 contrib build from here: > https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/ > I won't be sad if 2.34 > 2.36 is skipped in favor of a 2.37 build to > be in parity with FF40. > > - Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP] > I too played with 2.35 and 2.36 (54) without problems, but just in case there may be problems that did not affect what I do, I'm back here on 2.33.1. An apparently all my add-ons worked. I manually changed some of them to work with all versions of 2.* -- Ed, W3BNR HTTP://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR Tags by Pick-a-Tag 1.60ß1 "I made a wrong mistake."-Yogi Berra (1925-) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.35γ Latest Win32 build now available. = Whoops
On 7/22/2015 8:18 PM, W3BNR wrote: > On 7/22/2015 5:33 PM, Philip Chee wrote: >> http://seamonkey.callek.net/contrib/ >> >> ZIP archive: >> seamonkey-2.35.en-US.win32-20150722.txt >> seamonkey-2.35.en-US.win32-20150722.zip >> >> Installer: >> seamonkey-2.35.en-US.win32.installer-20150722.txt >> seamonkey-2.35.en-US.win32.installer-20150722.exe >> >> (The .txt files contain the file hashes) >> >> These builds are close to release and contain all the patches from: >> >> * Bug 1177041 - (SM2.35-Uplift) Bugs / Patches to be uplifted to >> comm-release for SeaMonkey 2.35 >> * Bug 1185824 - (SM2.35-mozilla-esr38-Uplift) Bugs / Patches to be >> uplifted to mozilla-esr38 relbranch for SeaMonkey 2.35 >> >> Please take these out for a test drive and let us know of any problems >> you encounter. >> >> Phil >> > > Downloaded seamonkey-2.35.en-US.win32-20150722.zip > installed and clicking on HELP/ABOUT shows version 2.33.1 > Sorry, not true - my fault - Had two directory screens open and opened the wrong seamonkey. I apologize. -- Ed, W3BNR HTTP://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR Tags by Pick-a-Tag 1.60ß1 "An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes that can be made in a very narrow field." -Niels Bohr (1885-1962) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.35γ Latest Win32 build now available.
On 7/22/2015 5:33 PM, Philip Chee wrote: > http://seamonkey.callek.net/contrib/ > > ZIP archive: > seamonkey-2.35.en-US.win32-20150722.txt > seamonkey-2.35.en-US.win32-20150722.zip > > Installer: > seamonkey-2.35.en-US.win32.installer-20150722.txt > seamonkey-2.35.en-US.win32.installer-20150722.exe > > (The .txt files contain the file hashes) > > These builds are close to release and contain all the patches from: > > * Bug 1177041 - (SM2.35-Uplift) Bugs / Patches to be uplifted to > comm-release for SeaMonkey 2.35 > * Bug 1185824 - (SM2.35-mozilla-esr38-Uplift) Bugs / Patches to be > uplifted to mozilla-esr38 relbranch for SeaMonkey 2.35 > > Please take these out for a test drive and let us know of any problems > you encounter. > > Phil > Downloaded seamonkey-2.35.en-US.win32-20150722.zip installed and clicking on HELP/ABOUT shows version 2.33.1 -- Ed, W3BNR HTTP://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR Tags by Pick-a-Tag 1.60ß1 "It gets late early out there."-Yogi Berra (1925-) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Popstate and duplicate messages....
On 7/19/2015 11:59 AM, SameulS wrote: > Bo1953 wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> My challenge for today is, I decided to delete all, or as many as I >> could, msf files on my Win 8.1pro in SM 2.33.1 and the issues I now face >> include having now over 150 popstate files and on going duplicate emails >> being dl'ed. >> >> What is it I need to do now to delete the popstate's stop duplicate >> emails? I have tried using Duplicate email finder and that is not >> working at all, currently. >> >> TIA for your assistance in this matter. >> >> bo1953 > > > Okay, what I finally wound up doing was to create a new profile and will save > the old one as it has emails which have been deleted from my system, which is > fine. > > My new question is: where do I find the password file so I can save them to > the > new SM location without having to save them all again? > > PW exporter does not work with SM 2.33.1. > > TIA bo1953 Convert PW Exporter to work with SM 2.X by using the information at: http://addonconverter.fotokraina.com/ -- Ed, W3BNR HTTP://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR Tags by Pick-a-Tag 1.60ß1 "The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing." -Socrates (470-399 BC) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: seamonkey obsolete?
On 6/18/2015 12:35 PM, Bill DeCoster wrote: > I find myself needing to use IE other programs more and more because of issues > with it. What's the point if nothing works? IMHO most of the issues that you see regarding IE vs SM is not in the SM's software. It is in the HTML of the pages that do not work or do not display properly in SM whilst they do work or display properly in IE. When you find a page that works in IE but not SM, check it out at https://validator-suite.w3.org/ If the validator shows errors, the problem you have with SM is NOT SM - it is the coding of that page. Contact the webmaster of that page and inform him (not that it will do and good). -- Ed, W3BNR HTTP://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR Tags by Pick-a-Tag 1.60ß1 "I wonder if illiterate people get the full effect of alphabet soup?" -Jerry Seinfeld (1954-) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Question about Seamonkey's life plans
On 4/14/2015 6:35 PM, HenriK wrote: > Edmund Wong wrote: >> jeff.nee...@gmail.com wrote: >>> Hi. I hope no one takes offense at my question. >>> >>> Is Seamonkey going to be around for a while? So many software developers >>> drop support for their products after a period of time. I'm investing a >>> lot of time and interest in Seamonkey. >>> >>> Is it thought that SM will continue to be developed? One can only >>> remember >>> Mozilla stopping development on Thunderbird and wonder about the >>> future of >>> SM. >> >> Both SeaMonkey and Thunderbird are still in development, although now >> as community projects (made up of volunteers). >> >> AFAIK, it's still being worked on, but, I might add, it does require >> more contributors (esp. in terms of coding). >> >> As for your initial question "Is SeaMonkey going to be around >> for a while", no one really can tell you. We, as contributors, >> certainly will do our best to make it be around for a while. >> >> Edmund >> > From the standpoint of this 77 year old SeaMonkey user since day one, I just > would like to thank all of you who contribute, have contributed, and will > contribute to keeping SeaMonkey going. I only wish I knew one tenth as much > as > you people know about software so all I can to is raise my glass and shout > 'Cheers' and 'Bravo' for your current, past, and future efforts! Got ya by 5 years. (82). I started with plain old unix commands on the network. Then using Pro-comm and Pro-comm+ with DOS. Some Mosaic - then on to Netscape and when it went bye-bye, SeaMonkey. Been here ever since. On Windows with the desktop and Linux on the two laptops. And I agree with all your comments. -- Ed, W3BNR HTTP://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR Tags by Pick-a-Tag 1.60ß1 Don't sling mud; for when it dries, it blows back on you. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Multipart/Alternative e-mails
On 3/26/2015 3:15 PM, EE wrote: > W3BNR wrote: >> I recently received an e-mail that was in two parts; one 'plain text' and the >> other 'HTML'. >> >> When viewing in HTML I saw one part and when viewing in plaint text I saw the >> other part. >> >> Message type in header was: >> "Content-type: multipart/alternative; >> boundary="Boundary_(ID_cKOPk/6CliG/Ro7OFuUArg)" >> >> I would not have known that this was a two part message except that, for one >> reason or another, I happened to look at the source. There is no indication >> of >> multipart in the Mail display. >> >> Is there any way of knowing beforehand that e-mail is multipart? >> > I can usually tell that because I read email as plain text, and there is > usually > little or no useful content in the plain text part of multipart mail. > Sometimes > there is a link to a web page, which is fine, but often not even that. > True, but I've gotten a couple where there are two completely different texts about different subject matter. One in plain text and the other in HTML. Not knowing that the e-mail was Multipart without reading the headers, I lost one or the other text. The sender expected me to know it was multipart. I had no inkling until he asked me why I did not reply to the part I didn't read. I naturally told him that I didn't get the e-mail. And then he explained. If this is going to be the 'new' think in e-mail the e-mail programs should start signifying that a msg is multipart. Been on the internet forever and never thought to send something like that. -- Ed, W3BNR HTTP://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR Tags by Pick-a-Tag 1.60ß1 "Klaatu Barada Nikto" Helen Benson to Gort in "The Day The Earth Stood Still" (1951) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Multipart/Alternative e-mails
I recently received an e-mail that was in two parts; one 'plain text' and the other 'HTML'. When viewing in HTML I saw one part and when viewing in plaint text I saw the other part. Message type in header was: "Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_cKOPk/6CliG/Ro7OFuUArg)" I would not have known that this was a two part message except that, for one reason or another, I happened to look at the source. There is no indication of multipart in the Mail display. Is there any way of knowing beforehand that e-mail is multipart? -- Ed, W3BNR HTTP://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR Tags by Pick-a-Tag 1.60ß1 The wise course is to profit from the mistakes of others. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Enigmail and SeaMonkey 2.33
On 3/15/2015 10:49 PM, NoOp wrote: > I found that upgrading to SeaMonkey 2.33 (linux and Windows) with the > Enigmail extension causes mailnews accounts to show as "Invalid > Account". So I checked around and found a few bugs related. Asked on the > Enigmail mail list & this is the result: > > <news://news.gmane.org:119/me2hol$n4v$1...@ger.gmane.org> > Subject: [Enigmail] SeaMonkey 2.33 & Enigmail 1.7.2 >> With both the linux and Windows versions of SeaMonkey Enigmail causes >> the mailnews accounts to show invalid. I notice these bug reports: >> >> http://sourceforge.net/p/enigmail/bugs/372/ >> (#372 Enigmail breaks Account Settings in Thunderbird Aurora) >> >> http://sourceforge.net/p/enigmail/bugs/429/ >> (#429 Mail Account Settings in SeaMonkey 2.33 broken by Enigmail) >> >> 372 states "Fixed in version: --- --> 1.8.0" >> Unfortunately 1.8.0 isn't release yet, and is not an option from the >> Download page. >> >> 429 shows that the bug report is invalid and states "This was fixed >> several months ago. Please use the latest nightly build form >> https://www.enigmail.net/download/nightly.php"; >> The nightly 1.8.a1pre does resolve that issue in SeaMonkey. >> >> 1.7.2 seems to work with Thunderbird 31.5.0 but does not work with >> SeaMonkey 2.33. Why is 429 closed as invalid? >> >> So now every SeaMonkey 2.33 Enigmail user is now expected to run >> Enigmail nightlys in order to not have Enigmail destroy the ability to >> edit SeaMonkey mailnews accounts? > > Response: > <news://news.gmane.org:119/5505404f.2040...@enigmail.net> >> On 15.03.15 00:55, NoOp wrote: >> >>>> So now every SeaMonkey 2.33 Enigmail user is now expected to run >>>> Enigmail nightlys in order to not have Enigmail destroy the ability >>>> to edit SeaMonkey mailnews accounts? >> >> 1. The current nightly is nearly - if not completeley - identical with >>the release version 1.8. Expect the release of 1.8 within days. >> >> 2. Seamonkey 2.33 is now 4 days old. So "now" will be very short. >> >> 3. Seamonkey users are small in number compared with total users. >>AMO says, Seamonkey 2.33 are about 400 "average daily users". >>Total is about 150'000. >> (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/enigmail/statistics/ >> usage/applications/?last=30) >> >> Given our limited resources it is not possible to publish an >> intermediate version for such a small number of users for such a small >> period of time. >> >> Ludwig > > So there you go. If you use enigmail you will need to use the 1.8 > nightlies until 1.8 is officially realeased. > > Seems that the: > <https://www.enigmail.net/home/index.php> > "Enigmail is a security extension to Mozilla Thunderbird and Seamonkey. > It enables you to write and receive email messages signed and/or > encrypted with the OpenPGP standard." > Should probably be changed to "Enigmail is a security extension to > Mozilla Thunderbird & if resources are available maybe SeaMonkey"... > > Is there a viable alternative to Enigmail for SeaMonkey (Windows and Linux)? > I've been running enigmail 1.8a1pre (20150108-0013) since SM 2.32. No problems. -- Ed, W3BNR HTTP://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR Tags by Pick-a-Tag 1.60ß1 "So once you do know what the question actually is, you'll know what the answer means."-Douglas Adams (1952-2001) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: other backup programs for SeaMonkey?
On 2/25/2015 4:11 PM, Richard Falken wrote: > David E. Ross wrote: >> The point of my earlier reply is that I backup my entire system, not >> just Mozilla. I am not sure why users would backup only Mozilla and not >> be concerned about the rest of their systems. >> >> > > I always perform full backups and have duplicates of the backups. > > The problem is that people does not like spending 200 dollar in backupping > hardware :-) > 1TB USB drives are available for under $100 at most stores in the US. Windows provides back-up function along with disk image software. More is available for free if you search the internet. Small investment to save many hours of re-creating (if possible) what you have lost. I create system images once a month. Do a backup of all data and other files I have created once a week. And a daily backup of just data and files that I created that day. I use Windows, Dell, my own BAT files and a free program, "PureSync" to do these backups on external drives and thumb drives. -- Ed, W3BNR HTTP://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR Tags by Pick-a-Tag 1.60ß1 "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." -President Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: OT malware remedy
On 2/25/2015 3:20 PM, Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP] wrote: > On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 11:40:16 -0500, William wrote: > >> I'm in the USA. I have been receiving emails, supposedly from FedEx, >> saying that there is a problem with a shipment to me and asking me to >> open the attached shipping label, which is a compressed file. My ISP >> marks these as spam, but sends them to me, which is consistent with what >> I have asked them to do. I suspect this is malware, because I am not >> expecting any shipments, and the shipment number they put in the header >> draws nothing when I go to the FedEx site to trace the shipment. >> >> In the past, I have discarded these, or sent them to my ISP who probably >> discards them. But the frequency is increasing and I am thinking that >> there must be some law enforcement agency that can deal with these >> knaves. Our city police have no such office, and apparently are not >> equipped to deal with this. >> >> Does any one know of a place these can be sent that would be interested >> in investigating and prosecuting? > > No one is going to prosecute because it's a hacked server hosting the > file. You can often contact the hosting company of the hacked server > where the malware resides...so long as it's not in Ukraine, Russia, > China, Romania, Bulgaria or any other eastern European host. If it is, > just delete the spam message and move on. > > You could try forwarding the message to spamsam...@messagelabs.com. > > - Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP] > Or copy and paste the complete (all headers included) e-mail into the form at spamcop. If you've never used the site, start here: https://www.spamcop.net/ -- Ed, W3BNR HTTP://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR Tags by Pick-a-Tag 1.60ß1 "All that is necessary for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing." -Edmund Burke (1729-1797) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM & Verizon FiOS e-mail
On 1/13/2015 12:59 PM, WaltS48 wrote: > On 01/13/2015 11:40 AM, HenriK wrote: >> Paul B. Gallagher wrote: >>> HenriK wrote: >>> >>>> Paul B. Gallagher wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Didn't SM invite you to enter your password? How did that go? >>>>> >>>> What really puzzles me is that I can reach this e-mail account via >>>> Verizon webmail using what I wrote down as both the correct user name >>>> and password. Accordingly, I believe neither is the problem. After >>>> I deleted all 'Verizon ...' entries in Password Manager, when I again >>>> tried to access the new e-mail account via SM's e-mail function, I >>>> got the usual 'authentication failure' response. >>> >>> You haven't answered my question -- when you get the authentication >>> failure, is >>> there no way out? Does SeaMonkey not prompt you to enter the correct >>> password? >>> >> Oh, I'm sorry. I seem to have misunderstood you. Yes, after I get the >> authentication failure message the first time I try to bring up my new >> Verizon e-mail account, SM prompts me to enter a new (correct) password. >> >> When I do that, I get the authentication failure message again and, >> again, SM prompts me to enter a new password. This routine seems to go >> on forever but I have actually tried to enter the correct password (the >> one that works with Verizon Webmail) only six times. >> >> Since the password unfailingly works with Verizon Webmail, I can only >> assume that my problem has something to do with the SM setup for this >> new Verizon e-mail account. Ideas? (and thanks for sticking with me on >> this). > > > Contact Verizon support. > And they will tell you that SeaMonkey is not supported. -- Ed, W3BNR HTTP://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR Tags by Pick-a-Tag 1.60ß1 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Two Challenges....!
On 1/5/2015 6:55 AM, W3BNR wrote:
> On 1/4/2015 9:10 AM, bo1953 wrote:
>> Hello all, I Am having two (2) major challenges (so I believe)on my desktop
>> w/windows 8.1, SM 2.31...
>>
>> The first upon trying to move my SM roaming profile to a different drive,
>> and set up new a new profile, SM does not recognize the moved files at all
>> and shuts down. What is it I need to do to achieve this successfully (move
>> from c: to e:)?
>>
>> The second challenge is, I do not remember which files I need to delete in
>> order to save some space on my HD until I Am able to successfully get the
>> files moved to another drive (from c: to e:). SM files are taking up 50g on
>> my 128g drive...
>>
>> I will be installing a larger drive as this overload is crippling my system
>> overall.
>>
>> TIA - bo1953
>>
Correction to following line ('Directories' replaces 'Files')
> SeaMonkey + Mozilla Directories on my Windows 7 with SM 2.31:
>
> ProgramFiles(X86)\MozillaFirefox 0 bytes
> ProgramFiles(x86)\Mozbackup308KB
> ProgramFiles(x86)\Seamonkey73.2MB
> User\X\AppData\Local\Mozilla 7.26MB
> User\X\AppData\Roaming\Mozbackup 7.26MB
> User\X\AppData\Roaming\Mozilla 180MB
>
> Looks like SeaMonkey takes up approximately 268.028MB not including cache.
> My cache files are in a separate directory C:\Seamonkey2\ and ALL files in
> that
> directory are deleted daily.
>
--
Ed, W3BNR
HTTP://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR
Tags by Pick-a-Tag 1.60ß1
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Two Challenges....!
On 1/4/2015 9:10 AM, bo1953 wrote: > Hello all, I Am having two (2) major challenges (so I believe)on my desktop > w/windows 8.1, SM 2.31... > > The first upon trying to move my SM roaming profile to a different drive, and > set up new a new profile, SM does not recognize the moved files at all and > shuts down. What is it I need to do to achieve this successfully (move from > c: to e:)? > > The second challenge is, I do not remember which files I need to delete in > order to save some space on my HD until I Am able to successfully get the > files moved to another drive (from c: to e:). SM files are taking up 50g on > my 128g drive... > > I will be installing a larger drive as this overload is crippling my system > overall. > > TIA - bo1953 > SeaMonkey + Mozilla files on my Windows 7 with SM 2.31: ProgramFiles(X86)\MozillaFirefox 0 bytes ProgramFiles(x86)\Mozbackup308KB ProgramFiles(x86)\Seamonkey73.2MB User\X\AppData\Local\Mozilla 7.26MB User\X\AppData\Roaming\Mozbackup 7.26MB User\X\AppData\Roaming\Mozilla 180MB Looks like SeaMonkey takes up approximately 268.028MB not including cache. My cache files are in a separate directory C:\Seamonkey2\ and ALL files in that directory are deleted daily. -- Ed, W3BNR HTTP://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR Tags by Pick-a-Tag 1.60ß1 "And may the schwartz be with you!" -Yogurt in "Space Balls" ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Update to SeaMonkey 2.31 caused a "crash"
On 12/25/2014 4:51 PM, Ant wrote: > FYI. This happened in my very old, updated Windows XP Pro SP3 and Debian > stable > boxes too from v2.26.1 to v2.31. :/ > > > On 12/21/2014 11:26 AM, Ant wrote: >> I ran into this problem yesterday morning in Mac OS X 10.8.5. I told it >> to send its bug report. It was a fairly clean SM too since I rarely used >> it. SM is sure having lots of bugs! :( >> >> >> On 12/15/2014 10:17 AM PT, Gerry Hickman typed: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> When there's a browser update, and you restart SM, it will run the >>> updater and then start the browser with a redirect to the release notes. >>> This has always worked. >>> >>> Today, I restarted SM, it ran the updater, but then a SM related dialog >>> (which I've never seen) appeared saying there had been a "crash" and did >>> I want to report it. I chose "Quit SeaMonkey", and now it seems to work >>> normally and reports the version as 2.31... Updated on my laptop - Linux Mint 16 Petra 32bit - it crashed and crashed no matter if I chose "Quit SeaMonkey" or "Restart SeaMonkey". Will have to reload 2.30 or use TB and FF. -- Ed, W3BNR HTTP://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR Tags by Pick-a-Tag 1.60ß1 "That the end of life should be death may sound sad; yet what other end can anything have?" -George Santayana (1863-1952) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey always asks to save pdf files
On 12/7/2014 8:30 PM, David Wilkinson wrote: > Mr. Ed wrote: >> In Windows - make Foxit Reader (you should really upgrade it to 7.0.3) >> the default program for .pdf files >> >> In SeaMonkey Edit/Preferences/Helper Applications find all references >> to Foxit PDF Document, except the FDF one, and make the action "Use >> Foxit Reader 7.0." >> >> When you click on a pdf file it will be downloaded and opened with out >> further manipulations of any kind by you. > > Yes, I know. But for some reason in my SeaMonkey Preferences/Helper > Applications list, the .FDF type was referred to as "Foxit Reader FDF > Document" and the .PDF type as "Adobe Acrobat Document" (which, as you > imply, seems unnatural). This I was not expecting, because Adobe Reader > has never been installed on this machine. > > I will look into the Foxit update but my copy does not suggest it when I > have it check for updates. > When you installed Foxit Reader did you have "Select plugin used to open PDF files in browser" checked? I think that's a default check, but I could be wrong. And the other ones during the installation of "Set Foxit Reader as the default viewer" and "Show PDF files in browser". Now I'm out of ideas. -- Ed, W3BNR HTTP://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR Tags by Pick-a-Tag 1.60ß1 To steal ideas from one person is plagiarism. To steal from many is research. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Bookmark file problems
On 12/1/2014 11:11 AM, Bob Minchin wrote: > W3BNR wrote: >> Bob, if the restore bookmarks is not working, which it isn't, why not >> just Export your current bookmarks as HTML, Copy that bookmarks.html >> file to your other computer and then import it there?? > Yes, I could do that but the HTML import feature is not very elegant in > that it does not give an option to append to or replace the existing > bookmarks, it just appends > > I can append and then edit - it is just messy which is a shame on a > decent browser like SM. > > Bob Ok - my reply was directed at Ed Mullen's comments, but I think your problem was already addressed. I agree, HTML exporting and importing really sucks. And unfortunately exporting and importing with .json has been removed. Best thing to do is to go to your profile directory and copy places.sqlite to a removable gadget and copy from there to your other computer's profile directory replacing the places.sqlite file there. -- Ed, W3BNR HTTP://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR Tags by Pick-a-Tag 1.60ß1 "The federal government has taken too much tax money from the people, too much authority from the states, and too much liberty with the Constitution."-Ronald Reagan (1911-2004) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Bookmark file problems
On 11/29/2014 12:52 PM, Ed Mullen wrote: > Bob Minchin wrote on 11/29/2014 11:25 AM: >> Hi, >> >> Currently using ver 2.30 running under winxp sp3 >> >> When I try and back up the bookmarks, a file .json is saved ok but I >> can't restore from it. I get an "unable to process the backup file" >> message. >> Is this a known problem >> Any ideas please? >> >> TIA >> >> Bob > > Yes, known issue. You should be making regular _complete_ backups of > your entire profile folder. If need be you can simply restore from the > backup the places.sqlite file into the profile folder to restore > bookmarks and history. > It doesn't take long to run a small batch file in Windows to backup what's important to YOU. Or even use a program like "PureSync" which is free to home users (donation requested by author). A simple batch file like the following will do the job (only two lines required): copy C:\Users\X\AppData\Roaming\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles\default\*.* X:\SeaMonkey\MozBackup\Profiles cd:c\ Where X = thumbnail, CD, DVD, or external disk drive. Create the file with an ascii editor line Notepad, save, change name from X.txt to X.BAT and move it to desktop. Double click the icon after shutting down SM and viola - in less than 15 seconds the job is done! -- Ed, W3BNR HTTP://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR Tags by Pick-a-Tag 1.60ß1 Future generations will be born free, equal and in debt. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Printing - SeaMoney only prints first page
On 11/29/2014 3:11 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: > NoOp wrote: > >> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >>> NoOp wrote: >>>> Printing the following web page: >>>> >>>> <http://www.familystylewithchefjeff.com/#!recipes/ckwa> >>>> >>>> results in only the first page being printed. Can someone please >>>> confirm? >>> >>> I would not be too quick to file a bug report about your browser. That >>> is a *horrible* page! I see it fail with several different browsers, at >>> least four of them. Tell Chef Jeff about the problem instead of >>> Mozilla... >> >> Regardless... perhaps you missed: "Printing the same page with Google >> Chromium and Opera results in correctly printing of all 5 pages." That's >> Chromium and Opera in both Windows and Linux. > > No, I did not miss your comments. I reported my own experience. Regardless > of what you decide to do, it is still a horribly designed page - that > fails in one way or another in multiple browsers of mine. > I wonder what wysiwyg conposer they used for the site. It is badly designed and a verification at W3C shows 10 errors in HLTM5. That means it probably will work in M$IE. I don't use IE so I can't check out my thoughts on that. -- Ed, W3BNR HTTP://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR Tags by Pick-a-Tag 1.60ß1 Don't use no double negatives. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Printing - SeaMoney only prints first page
On 11/29/2014 1:37 PM, NoOp wrote: > Printing the following web page: > > <http://www.familystylewithchefjeff.com/#!recipes/ckwa> > > results in only the first page being printed. Can someone please > confirm? (note don't waste paper - print to a virtual PDF printer or > just use 'File|Print Preview') > > Printing the same page with Google Chromium and Opera results in > correctly printing of all 5 pages. > > User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; rv:33.0) Gecko/20100101 > Firefox/33.0 SeaMonkey/2.30 > and > User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:33.0) Gecko/20100101 > Firefox/33.0 SeaMonkey/2.30 > and > Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:33.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/33.0 > and > Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; rv:33.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/33.0 > > Also tested using clean default 'test' profiles - no addons etc. > Confirmed -- Ed, W3BNR HTTP://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR Tags by Pick-a-Tag 1.60ß1 "He was a wise man who invented beer." -Plato (427BC-347BC) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Verizon Log On Challenges...
On 11/11/2014 1:39 PM, SamuelS wrote: > Hello all, > > I now have realized, since my previous post about this, that there is > something or some program which is blocking my access to verizon.net > accounts from my laptop. Using SM 2.30/Vista Business/Lenovo laptop T61 > > Thank you, > > SS Some, not all, of the Verizon pages are still using SSL 3.0. Perhaps you turned 'off' the SSL 3.0 option in Privacy & Security? -- Ed, W3BNR HTTP://JonesFarm.us/W3BNR Tags by Pick-a-Tag 1.60ß1 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: 2.30 still not up on Ubuntuzilla
On 10/24/2014 7:57 AM, Cruz, Jaime wrote: > Anyone have any clue when it might be up? > Help/Check for Updates worked for me with Linux Mint 17 -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: v2.30 is out.
On 10/21/2014 3:15 AM, Paul Marwick wrote: > W3BNR wrote: >> On 10/16/2014 4:17 PM, EE wrote: >>> Ant wrote: >>>> http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.30/ but no final >>>> release notes yet? I hope they fixed the issues I saw in v2.29 to cause >>>> me to go back to v2.26.1 like the address books' sorting, >>>> place.sqlite's >>>> history getting corrupted, etc. >>>> >>>> Thank you in advance. :) >>> The addressbook is fixed, but the bookmark restore from backup is not. >>> >>> >> Neither is the 'always load remote content' in e-mail. >> > > Worse than that, it doesn't want to show remote content at all here. > Clicking on "show remote content" does nothing at all > > Paul > > Many of the 'remote content' are images. Check to see what option you have selected in Edit/Preferences/Privacy&Security/Images -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: v2.30 is out.
On 10/19/2014 2:35 PM, Ant wrote: > On 10/19/2014 8:54 AM PT, W3BNR typed: > >>>> http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.30/ but no final >>>> release notes yet? I hope they fixed the issues I saw in v2.29 to cause >>>> me to go back to v2.26.1 like the address books' sorting, >>>> place.sqlite's >>>> history getting corrupted, etc. >>>> >>>> Thank you in advance. :) >>> >>> The addressbook is fixed, but the bookmark restore from backup is not. >> >> Neither is the 'always load remote content' in e-mail. > > [sighs] So many bugs. Are these very old ones or recent ones (e.g., > addressbooks' sorting)? Recent, if you consider 2.29 recent. -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: v2.30 is out.
On 10/16/2014 4:17 PM, EE wrote: > Ant wrote: >> http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.30/ but no final >> release notes yet? I hope they fixed the issues I saw in v2.29 to cause >> me to go back to v2.26.1 like the address books' sorting, place.sqlite's >> history getting corrupted, etc. >> >> Thank you in advance. :) > > The addressbook is fixed, but the bookmark restore from backup is not. > > Neither is the 'always load remote content' in e-mail. -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: 2.30 upgrade breaks seamonkey
On 10/16/2014 7:01 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: > WaltS48 wrote: >> On 10/16/2014 04:41 AM, jkdingw...@gmail.com wrote: >>> I allowed SeaMonkey to auto-update from 2.29.1 to 2.30 this morning >>> but it >>> appears to have broken the install for me and I'm unable to recover. >>> The >>> symptoms are that SeaMonkey will start but all windows have a normal >>> border >>> with all content being black. OS is Windows 7 Professional SP1 >>> (64-bit). I >>> have tried the following steps to try and make it work: >>> >>> Delete C:\Program Files (x86)\SeaMonkey and reinstall >>> Update video display drivers (Nvidia NVS 4200M) >>> Manually create a new profile by editing profiles.ini to add an extra >>> entry >>> Delete registry keys relating to SeaMonkey/Mozilla/Netscape from >>> HKCU/Software >>> and HKLM/Software. >>> >>> Reverting to 2.29.1 restores the correct behaviour. >>> >>> Has anyone else seen and solved a similar issue or is this worthy of >>> a bug >>> report? >>> >> >> >> Disable hardware acceleration in SM 2.30. Edit > Preferences > >> Appearance > >> Content. >> > How do you do that? The pages are all black, a tribute to a minimalist > theme, but not a good GUI. > Check your setting in Edit/Prefences/Appearance/Colors Do you have background set to black along with text set to black? -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: v2.30 is out.
On 10/16/2014 3:17 PM, Rufus wrote: > Ant wrote: >> On 10/16/2014 4:24 AM PT, W3BNR typed: >> >> >>> http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.30/ but no >> final >>>>> release notes yet? I hope they fixed the issues I saw in v2.29 to >>>>> cause >>>>> me to go back to v2.26.1 like the address books' sorting, >>>>> place.sqlite's >>>>> history getting corrupted, etc. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you in advance. :) >>>> >>>> Auto update gives an error message that it is unable to install update >>>> due to "Update XML file malformed (200)" >>> >>> Correct previous "Auto update" to read "Check for updates". >>> Downloaded 2.30 direct from http://www.seamonkey-project.org/ >>> and installed with no problems. >> >> That's not good. I guess I will wait again and stay with my old reliable >> v2.26.1! > > ...second. > Hmm. I don't believe I said anything about the reliability of v 2.30. The problem was with 2.29.1 and using 'help/check for updates' which may not even be a 2.29.1 problem. So far all seems good with 2.30. All my plugins are still working. Followups to mozilla.general -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: v2.30 is out.
On 10/16/2014 7:07 AM, W3BNR wrote: > On 10/16/2014 12:21 AM, Ant wrote: >> http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.30/ but no final >> release notes yet? I hope they fixed the issues I saw in v2.29 to cause >> me to go back to v2.26.1 like the address books' sorting, place.sqlite's >> history getting corrupted, etc. >> >> Thank you in advance. :) > > Auto update gives an error message that it is unable to install update > due to "Update XML file malformed (200)" > Correct previous "Auto update" to read "Check for updates". Downloaded 2.30 direct from http://www.seamonkey-project.org/ and installed with no problems. -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: v2.30 is out.
On 10/16/2014 12:21 AM, Ant wrote: > http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.30/ but no final > release notes yet? I hope they fixed the issues I saw in v2.29 to cause > me to go back to v2.26.1 like the address books' sorting, place.sqlite's > history getting corrupted, etc. > > Thank you in advance. :) Auto update gives an error message that it is unable to install update due to "Update XML file malformed (200)" -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Click here to always load remote content from
On 10/2/2014 9:13 PM, Ed Mullen wrote: > WaltS48 wrote: >> WaltS48 wrote: >>> On 10/01/2014 05:12 PM, Janine Starykowicz wrote: >>>> I can't set emails to always show remote content anymore, think this >>>> started in SM 29. Before it wouldn't even pop up the contact form. Now >>>> after 29.1 it pops up, but after I close the form nothing happens. I >>>> have to click show remote which only works on that particular email. >>>> >>>> Do I need to fill in more contact info or something now? >>> >>> >>> In SM 2.29 the contact form pops up, has the "Allow remote content" box >>> checked, saves the contact to the address book, but doesn't allow remote >>> content for me, unless I click the "Show Remote Content" button. >>> >>> I can not tell if new emails from the same contact will show remote >>> content at this time, but since today is "Arts Day of Giving" I should >>> get a few more reminders later today. >>> >>> I would say you discovered a bug. >>> >> >> >> UPDATE! >> >> Found an older email from the same sender and it doesn't show the remote >> content unless I click the "Show Remote Content" button. >> >> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/32.0 >> SeaMonkey/2.29 > > That's not the issue. What is broken is the ability for SM to remember > for a specific address that all remote content should be loaded. I have > an address book called "whitelist" where I have always stored > permissions for this. And it is no longer working. > > This NOT trivial. I get emails from various companies that contain > remote content: Bank of America, AMEX, my water company, various trusted > individuals, various other companies, etc. > > The breakage in SeaMonkey lately is really sad. Actually, it's probably > breakage in Thunderbird core but the effect is the same for we users. > > Mozilla has, apparently, become a one-product company: Firefox. All > other dev work has been compromised. > > Sigh. I suppose I ought to start looking. > Yes, this is a pain in the *ss. I checked bugzilla and don't find any bugs relating to this. Anyone gonna file one? -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.29 no Flash plugin (Linux) -fixed
On 9/17/2014 6:18 PM, David E. Ross wrote: > On 9/17/2014 3:14 PM, W3BNR wrote: >> On 9/16/2014 6:22 PM, NFN Smith wrote: >>> W3BNR wrote: >>>> Running Linux Mint Qiana Ver 17 and the repsitories do not have either >>>> SeaMonkey or Adobe Flash listed in the search. So they have both been >>>> loaded and installed per instructions to no avail. Moving the >>>> libflashplayer.so to where it should be and other places which seemed >>>> like likely possibilities provided no solution to the problem Perhaps I >>>> should go back to Mint 13 where it everything worked. >>>> >>>> As I said - I don't really need flash video anyhow. >>> >>> >>> I know that with Ubuntu, the standard method for installing Flash is to >>> install flashplugin-installer. I have no problems with Flash running in >>> both Seamonkey and Firefox running on Ubuntu 12.04. >>> >>> I have a Mint installation (16, I think) on a VM, but don't have it >>> started at the moment. If I remember correctly, a majority of Mint's >>> packages come from Ubuntu repositories (except in places where Mint has >>> explicitly done something different). I'm guessing that you should be >>> able to install flashplugin-installer via normal Mint procedures, and >>> it's likely to do what you want. >>> >>> I checked the Mint repository, and for a quiana installation, this may >>> be what you're looking for: >>> http://packages.linuxmint.com/pool/import/m/mint-flashplugin-10.2/mint-flashplugin-10.2_10.2.153.1_i386.deb >>> >>> >>> For what it's worth, Adobe is pretty sticky about demanding that >>> installs of its stuff come from direct downloads from Adobe servers. For >>> Windows and Mac stuff, if you're working in a corporate environment, and >>> want to keep current downloadables parked on a LAN, or distribution via >>> CD, you have to get a license to do that -- it's free, but they want an >>> estimate of how many copies get installed in the course of a year. >>> >>> With flash installers in Linux repositories, I believe that they're >>> merely frontend scripts that poll an Adobe server to download and install. >>> >>> Smith >>> >> >> Downloaded 10.2.153.1 as mentioned above. It installed effortlessly, >> unfortunatly SM blocks it when installed and wants to upgrade due to >> security issues. Tried the flash versions 11 and 10.3 but they won't >> install properly over 10.2 >> >> > > Quite some time ago, I found that Flash cannot be updated without first > deleting the prior version. It seems to install okay without deletion, > but it will not function unless all prior versions are deleted before > installation of a new version. For a while, I also had to install a new > version twice to get it to work. > Thanks David - That did the trick. Un-installed the old libflashplayer.so and installed the new flashplayer without a problem. -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.29 no Flash plugin (Linux)
On 9/16/2014 6:22 PM, NFN Smith wrote: > W3BNR wrote: >> Running Linux Mint Qiana Ver 17 and the repsitories do not have either >> SeaMonkey or Adobe Flash listed in the search. So they have both been >> loaded and installed per instructions to no avail. Moving the >> libflashplayer.so to where it should be and other places which seemed >> like likely possibilities provided no solution to the problem Perhaps I >> should go back to Mint 13 where it everything worked. >> >> As I said - I don't really need flash video anyhow. > > > I know that with Ubuntu, the standard method for installing Flash is to > install flashplugin-installer. I have no problems with Flash running in > both Seamonkey and Firefox running on Ubuntu 12.04. > > I have a Mint installation (16, I think) on a VM, but don't have it > started at the moment. If I remember correctly, a majority of Mint's > packages come from Ubuntu repositories (except in places where Mint has > explicitly done something different). I'm guessing that you should be > able to install flashplugin-installer via normal Mint procedures, and > it's likely to do what you want. > > I checked the Mint repository, and for a quiana installation, this may > be what you're looking for: > http://packages.linuxmint.com/pool/import/m/mint-flashplugin-10.2/mint-flashplugin-10.2_10.2.153.1_i386.deb > > > For what it's worth, Adobe is pretty sticky about demanding that > installs of its stuff come from direct downloads from Adobe servers. For > Windows and Mac stuff, if you're working in a corporate environment, and > want to keep current downloadables parked on a LAN, or distribution via > CD, you have to get a license to do that -- it's free, but they want an > estimate of how many copies get installed in the course of a year. > > With flash installers in Linux repositories, I believe that they're > merely frontend scripts that poll an Adobe server to download and install. > > Smith > Downloaded 10.2.153.1 as mentioned above. It installed effortlessly, unfortunatly SM blocks it when installed and wants to upgrade due to security issues. Tried the flash versions 11 and 10.3 but they won't install properly over 10.2 -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.29 no Flash plugin (Linux)
On 9/16/2014 2:39 PM, WaltS48 wrote: > On 09/16/2014 02:16 PM, W3BNR wrote: >> On 9/16/2014 11:55 AM, Ed Mullen wrote: >>> Tried the console window running the msi installer to no avail. Firefox >>> got the plugin, SeaMonkey did not. A mystery! :-) >>> >> Like you, I've tried everything under the sun. Search of internet gives >> no new information. Every page with info on installing Flash on Linux >> was investigated and tried. Nothing seems to work. Oh, well, I usually >> only use the lap top on trips for e-mail and reading newspapers. >> > > > Is your SeaMonkey and Flash installed through your Linux systems > repositories or manually from Mozilla and Adobe? > > My SeaMonkey installed from openSUSE picks up all the plugins installed > into /usr/lib64/browser-plugins by openSUSE including Flash. > > For my manually installed Firefox Beta and Nightly versions I had to > create a plugins folder in .mozilla and add a symbolic link to > /usr/lib64/browser-plugins/libflashplayer.so. > > It is so much easier to let the distro handle Flash and its updates. > Running Linux Mint Qiana Ver 17 and the repsitories do not have either SeaMonkey or Adobe Flash listed in the search. So they have both been loaded and installed per instructions to no avail. Moving the libflashplayer.so to where it should be and other places which seemed like likely possibilities provided no solution to the problem Perhaps I should go back to Mint 13 where it everything worked. As I said - I don't really need flash video anyhow. -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.29 no Flash plugin (Linux)
On 9/16/2014 11:55 AM, Ed Mullen wrote: > Ed Mullen wrote: >> Trane Francks wrote: >>> On 9/16/14 11:21 AM, Ed Mullen wrote: >>>> Lemuel Johnson wrote: >>>>> On 9/14/2014 11:37 AM, Ed Mullen wrote: >>>>>> SeaMonkey updated to 2.29 on Sept 9. >>>>>> >>>>>> Just tried to play a Flash video at nbc.com and SM said I needed to >>>>>> install a plugin. I let proceed and closed SM when the installer said >>>>>> to. Restarted SM. Went to add-ons manager, no Flash plugin, only >>>>>> Quicktime. >>>>>> >>>>>> Uninstalled SM. Downloaded full installer from Mozilla. Installed. Ran >>>>>> Flash installer. Firefox has the Flash plugin, SM does not. Anyone >>>>>> else? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I have SM 2.29 and the one Parks and Recreation episode I started at >>>>> nbc.com began playing normally. Right-click on the video and Flash >>>>> shows version 14.0.0.179. >>>> >>>> I wasn't suggesting a problem with nbc.com, I detailed a SeaMonkey/Flash >>>> issue. The problem had nothing to do with nbc.com. >>>> >>> Ed, have you tried both the EXE- and MSI-based installers? If you >>> haven't tried both, download the one you haven't used (again, for the >>> plug-in browswers). Then, for a lark, open a console window as >>> administrator (Type 'cmd' in the search, right click and run as admin). >>> CD the console to your download location and run the installer that way. >>> >>> As a recursor to the installation step, uninstall Flash. Also, prior to >>> the installation, (and, again, just for a lark) close all your >>> plug-in-based browsers. With any luck, this all should get your Windows' >>> Flash installation working properly with SeaMonkey. >>> >> >> Yep. Tried the Web/stub installer, the full exe, and the msi. Haven't >> tried the console route but I'll try that later. Thanks for the suggestion. >> >> Although, it's also odd that SM "lost" my NVIDIA drivers and Silverlight >> plugins at the same time as Flash. I also manually added them to the >> folder I created in the installation folder. >> >> > > Tried the console window running the msi installer to no avail. Firefox > got the plugin, SeaMonkey did not. A mystery! :-) > Like you, I've tried everything under the sun. Search of internet gives no new information. Every page with info on installing Flash on Linux was investigated and tried. Nothing seems to work. Oh, well, I usually only use the lap top on trips for e-mail and reading newspapers. -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Address book help
On 9/15/2014 6:01 PM, Juiceman wrote: > Is there a quick way to copy my address book from one computer to > another one that also has SeaMonkey installed on it? Also will the same > address work with Mozilla Thunderbird? Addressbook - Tools - Export as .ldif file on first machine. Addressbook - Tools - Import on second machine -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.29 no Flash plugin
On 9/14/2014 12:37 PM, Ed Mullen wrote: > SeaMonkey updated to 2.29 on Sept 9. > > Just tried to play a Flash video at nbc.com and SM said I needed to > install a plugin. I let proceed and closed SM when the installer said > to. Restarted SM. Went to add-ons manager, no Flash plugin, only > Quicktime. > > Uninstalled SM. Downloaded full installer from Mozilla. Installed. Ran > Flash installer. Firefox has the Flash plugin, SM does not. Anyone else? > Going to nbc.com and clicking on a video I get a message: "Requested Format Not Available None of the requested formats are available for this content." I have no add-on or plugin for either Flash nor Quicktime. A "search" for add-ons gives no results. Running SM 2.29 on my laptop with Linux Mint 17 XFE. -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Linux SM Question
On 9/14/2014 5:53 AM, Daniel wrote: > On 13/09/14 21:58, W3BNR wrote: >> On 9/12/2014 7:26 PM, Cruz, Jaime wrote: >>> W3BNR wrote: >>>> I installed Linux Mint 17 on a laptop last week and went to import my >>>> password file from my Winows7 desktop. >>>> >>>> It was then that I found out that the Linux version of SM 2.29 does not >>>> have an option to "Import" OR "Export" Passwords. Only option is >>>> Password Manager. >>>> >>>> Any sugestions? Or does anyone know if there are plans to incorporate >>>> the function in the Linux version? >>>> >>> >>> I just copied the "Mozilla folder" in Windows to ".mozilla" in Linux and >>> EVERYTHING was there. >>> >> >> Thanks for the hint Jaime - will give it a shot later today. >> > Why would you bother?? Your Linux system can "see" all your Windows > files, so why not just point your Linux SM to your Windows profile and > all should be well?? > > Just as I'm doing now!! > Didn't have time to try it - still on the 'to do' list. And my Linux system doesn't see my Window system. One floor and two rooms apart. (:> Windows on desktop and Linux on laptop. No dual operating systems on either machine. -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Linux SM Question
On 9/12/2014 7:26 PM, Cruz, Jaime wrote: > W3BNR wrote: >> I installed Linux Mint 17 on a laptop last week and went to import my >> password file from my Winows7 desktop. >> >> It was then that I found out that the Linux version of SM 2.29 does not >> have an option to "Import" OR "Export" Passwords. Only option is >> Password Manager. >> >> Any sugestions? Or does anyone know if there are plans to incorporate >> the function in the Linux version? >> > > I just copied the "Mozilla folder" in Windows to ".mozilla" in Linux and > EVERYTHING was there. > Thanks for the hint Jaime - will give it a shot later today. -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Linux SM Question
I installed Linux Mint 17 on a laptop last week and went to import my password file from my Winows7 desktop. It was then that I found out that the Linux version of SM 2.29 does not have an option to "Import" OR "Export" Passwords. Only option is Password Manager. Any sugestions? Or does anyone know if there are plans to incorporate the function in the Linux version? -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: No Cache Files - 2.29?
On 9/11/2014 7:46 AM, WaltS48 wrote: > On 09/11/2014 07:36 AM, W3BNR wrote: >> On 9/11/2014 6:08 AM, Tom Pamin wrote: >>> After upgrading to 2.29, I no longer see any cache files in my Cache >>> folder. I checked under Preferences, and the folder location has not >>> changed. Where have the files gone? >> >> Apparently a different format. I have kept my cache files in a >> directory named C:\Seamonkey2 which were in SM's Cache files. Now the >> entry created by SM is cache2 but still in c:\Seamonkey2 as I directed. >> >> I noticed that there is no mention of this change in the release notes. >> This should be considered a 'major change' but is not noted. But then >> again perhaps I'm wrong in my assumption of a 'different format'. >> > > > Mozilla Platform Changes. > > HTTP caching (v2) has been enabled. > > REF: <http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.29/> > > < > Thank you. I was looking at: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.29/changes where I saw no mention of the change. -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: No Cache Files - 2.29?
On 9/11/2014 6:08 AM, Tom Pamin wrote: > After upgrading to 2.29, I no longer see any cache files in my Cache > folder. I checked under Preferences, and the folder location has not > changed. Where have the files gone? Apparently a different format. I have kept my cache files in a directory named C:\Seamonkey2 which were in SM's Cache files. Now the entry created by SM is cache2 but still in c:\Seamonkey2 as I directed. I noticed that there is no mention of this change in the release notes. This should be considered a 'major change' but is not noted. But then again perhaps I'm wrong in my assumption of a 'different format'. -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Latest version SeaMonkey will not download any email/news
On 9/10/2014 12:40 AM, PhillipJones wrote: > Updated SeaMonkey to latest version 29. > After which all ability to download any email or news stopped. > Would sit there grinding try to find something to download. > > I opened FireFox and went xfinity website and signed into email and show > 16 pieces of email waiting to be read. > > Closed Firefox. Reopened SeaMonkey again. > Manually click on Get Email. > Same thing just sit there, grinding but not finding anything. > > Used Time Machine to go back just before new version installed and > restored old version. > > Opened and mail download so fast I could barely see it download. (This > late at night my comcast connection is pretty decent.) > > I might try again, if it does again I will restore back to this version > and forget it. > > Using Mac Version. > Remove the "Remember Password" add-on if you have it installed. -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: eMail Connection...
On 9/9/2014 2:49 PM, Arnie Goetchius wrote: > SamuelS wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> My latest challenge is when at home my SM 2.29 d/l'd email with no >> challenges wirelessly.. now at my office SM will not download. Nothing >> at all. There are messages in web mail waiting to dl.. >> >> I can access newsgroups and can go to web sites without challenge. >> >> Any ideas as to what the challenge or possible solutions are for my >> laptop, Vista Business machine can be? >> >> TIA - bo1953 > I have the same problem running Windows XP SP3. Can't download any > email. I have a spare machine with the same OS and it downloads email > okay. I think I need to tweak something to make it work but I don't know > what. > If you have 'Remember Password' add-on installed, remove it. -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: v2.29's addressbooks not sorting correctly in its Name column?
On 9/9/2014 9:46 AM, Ant wrote: > On 9/9/2014 2:53 AM, Tom Pamin wrote: > >>>> Or is it just me? I had to click on Nickname column and then click on >>>> Name column to fix it. I didn't have this problme in previous versions. >>> >>> Same here. >>> Heinz >>> >> Me too > > [sighs] I reproduced it on my Debian/Linux's64-bit SM v2.29 and in > Windows XP Pro SP3. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1064664 > already has this reported. It appears that if you sort first on the e-mail address column the name column will then sort properly. If you sort first on the name, it does not work properly. -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: PROBLEM WITH SM 2.29 - (RESOLVED)
On 9/8/2014 8:09 PM, W3BNR wrote: > On 9/8/2014 6:10 PM Larry submitted the following: >> Used auto update on laptop, Win 7,to update from 2.26.1 to SM 2.29. >> After update all internet connections, including SM 2.29 update page, >> showed "connection refused". Same for all mail accounts and news groups. >> >> Using IE on the same machine I was able to download and re-install 2.29 >> again with same results, "connection refused". >> >> Used IE to download and re-install 2.26.1. Problem solved, works >> perfectly except for latest security updates etc. >> >> Is this a known problem with 2.29? How do I get 2.29 to install >> properly in my Win 7 laptop? >> >> Any help appreciated. >> >> Larry > > Same here. I downloaded and installed 2.29 over 2.26.1 and mail just > sits there 'connecting to' on multiple accounts. I had loaded 2.29.b1 > and used it for about 2 days with no problem. Reinstalled 2.26.1 which > works ok. > Me be dummy. RTFM!!! I had the Remember Password add-on installed. Removed it and problems disappeared. Me, who tells everyone to be sure to read documentation before installing or complaining, fails to heed his on advice. I deserve 24 lashes. -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: PROBLEM WITH SM 2.29
On 9/8/2014 8:09 PM, W3BNR wrote: > On 9/8/2014 6:10 PM Larry submitted the following: >> Used auto update on laptop, Win 7,to update from 2.26.1 to SM 2.29. >> After update all internet connections, including SM 2.29 update page, >> showed "connection refused". Same for all mail accounts and news groups. >> >> Using IE on the same machine I was able to download and re-install 2.29 >> again with same results, "connection refused". >> >> Used IE to download and re-install 2.26.1. Problem solved, works >> perfectly except for latest security updates etc. >> >> Is this a known problem with 2.29? How do I get 2.29 to install >> properly in my Win 7 laptop? >> >> Any help appreciated. >> >> Larry > > Same here. I downloaded and installed 2.29 over 2.26.1 and mail just > sits there 'connecting to' on multiple accounts. I had loaded 2.29.b1 > and used it for about 2 days with no problem. Reinstalled 2.26.1 which > works ok. > Further investigation shows that the problem also exists in 2.29.b2. Problem is not there in 2.2.b1. Running Windows 7 (62bit) up-to-date. Perhaps a change in some e-mail security patch causing the problem. I do NOT use a "Master Password" on any system. My server is Verizon. -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: PROBLEM WITH SM 2.29
On 9/8/2014 8:09 PM, W3BNR wrote: > On 9/8/2014 6:10 PM Larry submitted the following: >> Used auto update on laptop, Win 7,to update from 2.26.1 to SM 2.29. >> After update all internet connections, including SM 2.29 update page, >> showed "connection refused". Same for all mail accounts and news groups. >> >> Using IE on the same machine I was able to download and re-install 2.29 >> again with same results, "connection refused". >> >> Used IE to download and re-install 2.26.1. Problem solved, works >> perfectly except for latest security updates etc. >> >> Is this a known problem with 2.29? How do I get 2.29 to install >> properly in my Win 7 laptop? >> >> Any help appreciated. >> >> Larry > > Same here. I downloaded and installed 2.29 over 2.26.1 and mail just > sits there 'connecting to' on multiple accounts. I had loaded 2.29.b1 > and used it for about 2 days with no problem. Reinstalled 2.26.1 which > works ok. > Also when trying to send an e-mail I get an error saying SM cannot find my password. It does not ask for one. Just says it cannot find one. Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: PROBLEM WITH SM 2.29
On 9/8/2014 9:22 PM, W3BNR wrote: > On 9/8/2014 8:09 PM, W3BNR wrote: >> On 9/8/2014 6:10 PM Larry submitted the following: >>> Used auto update on laptop, Win 7,to update from 2.26.1 to SM 2.29. >>> After update all internet connections, including SM 2.29 update page, >>> showed "connection refused". Same for all mail accounts and news groups. >>> >>> Using IE on the same machine I was able to download and re-install 2.29 >>> again with same results, "connection refused". >>> >>> Used IE to download and re-install 2.26.1. Problem solved, works >>> perfectly except for latest security updates etc. >>> >>> Is this a known problem with 2.29? How do I get 2.29 to install >>> properly in my Win 7 laptop? >>> >>> Any help appreciated. >>> >>> Larry >> >> Same here. I downloaded and installed 2.29 over 2.26.1 and mail just >> sits there 'connecting to' on multiple accounts. I had loaded 2.29.b1 >> and used it for about 2 days with no problem. Reinstalled 2.26.1 which >> works ok. >> > > Also when trying to send an e-mail I get an error saying SM cannot find > my password. It does not ask for one. Just says it cannot find one. > > Ed, W3BNR > But it let me post this in Mozilla News. Interesting - wonder if it's a Verizon (my server) problem? -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: PROBLEM WITH SM 2.29
On 9/8/2014 6:10 PM Larry submitted the following: > Used auto update on laptop, Win 7,to update from 2.26.1 to SM 2.29. > After update all internet connections, including SM 2.29 update page, > showed "connection refused". Same for all mail accounts and news groups. > > Using IE on the same machine I was able to download and re-install 2.29 > again with same results, "connection refused". > > Used IE to download and re-install 2.26.1. Problem solved, works > perfectly except for latest security updates etc. > > Is this a known problem with 2.29? How do I get 2.29 to install > properly in my Win 7 laptop? > > Any help appreciated. > > Larry Same here. I downloaded and installed 2.29 over 2.26.1 and mail just sits there 'connecting to' on multiple accounts. I had loaded 2.29.b1 and used it for about 2 days with no problem. Reinstalled 2.26.1 which works ok. -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: MozBackup
On 9/3/2014 12:13 PM NoOp submitted the following: > On 08/31/2014 03:33 AM, Ed wrote: >> On 8/30/2014 8:56 PM Mike C submitted the following: >>> Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP] wrote: >>>>> I had a very good experience with MozBackup last week. My laptop got >>>>> very "sick" and sensing impending doom, I had the presence of mind to >>>>> run MozBackup and get the backup file off onto a thumb drive before the >>>>> Windows 7 OS became so corrupted that a restore from the original disks >>>>> became necessary (to a new hard drive). After 186 windows patches, I was >>>>> ready to install SeaMonkey. Then I ran MozBackup and restored the >>>>> profile and all of my settings and emails. They only other thing I had >>>>> to do was manually install my favorite extensions. Good job MozBackup! >>>>> >>>>> Allen >>>> >>>> The tool hasn't been updated in 2+ years. Haven't used it for eons. >>>> >>>> - Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP] >>>> >>> I also swear by MozBackup! >>> I'm using MozBackup-1.5.1-EN >>> Get it here: http://mozbackup.jasnapaka.com/ >>> >>> It don't believe it needs updating. >> >> I;ve been using MozBackup 1.5.2b from the same place. >> (In addition to backing up all data files daily and making a complete >> system image monthly - Worked in data processing/large scale computers >> for over 35 years. Hard to explain loosing months of man-power due to >> not backing up data to management) >> > > With all that experience, why not just use rsync/grsync instead? > > Well, I guess I could say because I don't want to. Besides Windows for making the system image, I use PureSync which has all the options I need and at times the sync option of PowerDesk. It all depends on the what, how, and why I'm performing the backup. I guess you could also ask why I waste any of this time when I could install an external RAID drive or two. Problem solved. No operator intervention required. -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Reply All function (Fixed?)
On 8/28/2014 6:37 PM Trane Francks submitted the following: > On 8/29/14 5:28 AM, David E. Ross wrote: >> On 8/28/2014 12:57 PM, W3BNR wrote: >>> On 8/28/2014 11:01 AM W3BNR submitted the following: >>>> Just had a reason to use 'reply all' in a long time. It didn't work. >>>> Only replied to the sender. WIN7 SM 2.26.1 What am I missing? >>>> >>> >>> Interesting - tried a number of times and experimented with other e-mail >>> that had more than one address and the 'reply all' function only brought >>> up a compose box to the sender of the e-mail. >>> >>> I closed SM and restarted it and things are normal(?). It now brings up >>> the compose box with all addressees and the sender in "TO" boxes. >>> >>> Aren't computers wonderful? >>> >> >> A number of users (including me) argue that Reply All should put the >> prior sender's address in the To: field and the other recipients' >> addresses in the CC: field. That was the way the mail-news component >> used to work. This argument appears to be supported by RFC 5322, which >> is the closest statement to a standard that exists on this issue. >> >> See bug #933472 at >> <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=933472>. If Mozilla and >> Mozilla-based products are to continue claiming to be >> standards-compliant, this needs to be fixed. >> > Agreed. The change in behaviour is disconcerting. > My vote added to bug. -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Reply All function (Fixed?)
On 8/28/2014 11:01 AM W3BNR submitted the following: > Just had a reason to use 'reply all' in a long time. It didn't work. > Only replied to the sender. WIN7 SM 2.26.1 What am I missing? > Interesting - tried a number of times and experimented with other e-mail that had more than one address and the 'reply all' function only brought up a compose box to the sender of the e-mail. I closed SM and restarted it and things are normal(?). It now brings up the compose box with all addressees and the sender in "TO" boxes. Aren't computers wonderful? -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Reply All function
Just had a reason to use 'reply all' in a long time. It didn't work. Only replied to the sender. WIN7 SM 2.26.1 What am I missing? -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Cannot delete Google Chrome
On 7/30/2014 9:18 PM Mort submitted the following: > WaltS48 wrote: >> On 07/29/2014 08:55 PM, Mort wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Updating Avast inadvertently downloaded Google Chrome to my H.D., >>> (running Windows XP, SP-3). Now, I cannot delete it. It does not show up >>> on the list of programs in control panel's section on programs, yet it >>> is there with a H.D. search. Each time that I attempt toa delete it, I >>> get a message on screen that it cannot be deleted. >>> >>> How can I actually delete it from my H.D.? >>> Any help will be appreciated. >>> >>> Mort Linder >> >> >> Install and run these programs, consecutively, not simultaneously. >> >> <http://www.superantispyware.com/> >> <http://www.safer-networking.org/en/index.html> >> <http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/download/adwcleaner/> >> <https://www.malwarebytes.org/> >> >> If these don't find it or can't clear it, post in one of these forums >> for specialized malware removal help: >> >> <http://www.spywarewarrior.com/index.php> >> <http://bleepingcomputer.com/> >> <http://www.spywareinfoforum.com/> >> <http://aumha.net/viewforum.php?f=30> >> > Hi Walt, > > Thanks for the suggestion. Inasmuch as I already have Super- antispyware > on board I'll try posting the problem with them. Google seems to make > sure that their Chrome is almost impossible to delete. > > Mort Linder You might also want to try a free program: Wise Program Uninstaller - I've had it work when others failed. http://www.wisecleaner.com/wiseuninstallerfree.html -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: transfer bookmarks
On 6/29/2014 6:30 AM W3BNR submitted the following: > On 6/28/2014 11:01 PM Ed Mullen submitted the following: >> W3BNR pounded out : >>> On 6/28/2014 3:59 PM Juiceman submitted the following: >>>> I would like to copy my bookmarks on my laptop computer to my other >>>> computer. What files do I need to copy for my other computer to display >>>> the bookmarks? >>> >>> I've had no problems using the Bookmarks Manager/Tools/Backup & Restore >>> functions to transfer bookmarks from my desktop (Win7)and my laptop >>> (Linux Mint Maya). >>> >> >> I don't get it. What doesn't work perfectly by copying the >> places.sqlite file? That is the simplest way to effect this. And no >> chances that something will be lost in the translation. And, fewer steps. >> > > Agreed, it is simpler. But since the developers furnished me a means to > create and copy in their software, I use it. > >> I frequently copy places.sqlite from my SeaMonkey profile to my Firefox >> profile. Also, from my SM profile on one computer to another, etc. >> Simplest thing. >> > > And to continue where I left off (must have erased it before I sent the previous post - see thread "Ignore Please") When you use the 'Backup' option SM creates a file BookMarks-(Date).json. and allows you to save it where you want. If you forgot where you saved it. Just search for book?.json ignoring the ones in /xx/x/x/Roaming/Mozilla. The 'Restore' function takes any bookmark-(date).json file and re-writes your bookmark file. -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Ignore please.
On 6/29/2014 2:33 PM Ant submitted the following: > Oops! Wrong newsgroup and wasn't meant to be posted. Argh. Sorry! I > wished we could cancel our own newsgroup posts!! I'm with you - I too wish I could cancel a post which I may have posted too quickly without reading it. I happens even to the best of us. -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: transfer bookmarks
On 6/28/2014 11:01 PM Ed Mullen submitted the following: > W3BNR pounded out : >> On 6/28/2014 3:59 PM Juiceman submitted the following: >>> I would like to copy my bookmarks on my laptop computer to my other >>> computer. What files do I need to copy for my other computer to display >>> the bookmarks? >> >> I've had no problems using the Bookmarks Manager/Tools/Backup & Restore >> functions to transfer bookmarks from my desktop (Win7)and my laptop >> (Linux Mint Maya). >> > > I don't get it. What doesn't work perfectly by copying the > places.sqlite file? That is the simplest way to effect this. And no > chances that something will be lost in the translation. And, fewer steps. > Agreed, it is simpler. But since the developers furnished me a means to create and copy in their software, I use it. > I frequently copy places.sqlite from my SeaMonkey profile to my Firefox > profile. Also, from my SM profile on one computer to another, etc. > Simplest thing. > -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: transfer bookmarks
On 6/28/2014 3:59 PM Juiceman submitted the following: > I would like to copy my bookmarks on my laptop computer to my other > computer. What files do I need to copy for my other computer to display > the bookmarks? I've had no problems using the Bookmarks Manager/Tools/Backup & Restore functions to transfer bookmarks from my desktop (Win7)and my laptop (Linux Mint Maya). -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?
Ignore my previous post. Sorry. -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?
On 6/9/2014 1:57 PM Ant submitted the following: > W3BNR wrote: > >>>> media.webm.enabled - set to false in about:config. >>> >>> But then I will have to turn it on again via there again if I want it. I >>> want on demand "play" when blocked. >> >> You could install Prefbar and have a button turn it false/true (on/off). > > I decided to use Prefbar's method again since I don't see any other > options, but I cannot seem to get it to work on my office's 64-bit W7 > machine's SeaMonkey v2.26 web browser. Am I missing something or doing > it wrong in PrefBar? http://i.imgur.com/2Ufl8zy.gif for a screen > shot/capture. I have old instructions that said: > > "1. Right click anywhere on 'PrefBar' and select 'Customize PrefBar'. > 2. Right click anywhere in the 'Available Items' box and select 'New'. > 3. From drop-down menu select 'Checkbox'. > 4. Fill in the 'Checkbox' form as follows: > a. Id:WebM > b. Label: WebM > c. toPrep:value > d. fromPrep: value > e. Hotkey:(disabled) > 5. Click on 'Apply." > > I do see its value changing when I toggle through about:config so > PrefBar's toggle works. HTML5 videos still show up in web pages like: > http://www.theonion.com/video/the-onion-looks-back-at-saving-private-ryan,36211/ > > http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/c61f805aa7/reading-rainbow-s-new-theme-song-with-levar-burton > > > Thank you in advance. :) Right click on the prefbar Select 'Customize' Right click in the 'Available Items' listing Select 'New' Select 'Checkbox' Fill in the blanks: Id: webm Label: WebM Prefstring: media.webm.enabled toPref: value fromPref: value Leave "Hotkey" as disabled -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Are there any good ondemand HTML5 video blockers?
On 6/8/2014 9:55 PM Ant submitted the following: > On 6/8/2014 10:14 AM PT, Ed Mullen typed: > >>> I noticed more and more web sites (e.g., FunnyOrDie.com and >>> TheOnion.com) are going dumping Flash and using HTML5 videos to play >>> their embedded *.webm video files. They get annoying when I don't want >>> to play the videos right away. >>> >>> I have not seen any good on demand blockers for these HTML5 videos >>> especially when I open multiple tabs with videos. Are there any good >>> ones for the (lat/new)est web browsers yet? They should be like >>> FlashBlock, Mozilla web browsers' internal plug-in blockers, etc. >>> >>> Thank you in advance. :) >> >> <http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mozilla.seamonkey.user/37102> >> >> media.webm.enabled - set to false in about:config. > > But then I will have to turn it on again via there again if I want it. I > want on demand "play" when blocked. You could install Prefbar and have a button turn it false/true (on/off). -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: what happened to confirm empty trash?
On 6/3/2014 7:23 AM W3BNR submitted the following: > On 6/2/2014 7:43 PM Miles Fidelman submitted the following: >> Seems like, after the latest update, I'm no longer asked to confirm when >> I empty the trash. Is this configurable? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Miles Fidelman >> > > Check about:config if mailnews.emptyTrash is set to "True", change it to > "False". > > > AND be careful of what you're doing. > Should be mailnews.emptyTrash.dontAskAgain Sorry - I'm too quick with the send button. -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: what happened to confirm empty trash?
On 6/2/2014 7:43 PM Miles Fidelman submitted the following: > Seems like, after the latest update, I'm no longer asked to confirm when > I empty the trash. Is this configurable? > > Thanks, > > Miles Fidelman > Check about:config if mailnews.emptyTrash is set to "True", change it to "False". AND be careful of what you're doing. -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: what happened to confirm empty trash?
On 6/2/2014 7:43 PM Miles Fidelman submitted the following: > Seems like, after the latest update, I'm no longer asked to confirm when > I empty the trash. Is this configurable? > > Thanks, > > Miles Fidelman > Yes, go to Edit/Preferences/Mail&Newsgroups Select the top box. -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: I love SeaMonkey - please keep it the same!
On 5/1/2014 8:32 PM Ed Mullen submitted the following: < Deleted text that I'm not commenting on has been deleted > > You're not having near enough fun, Dave. I turn 64 in August. I have: > > - 3 computers > - 3 tablets > - 2 smart phones > - 4 Tivos > - a Comcast DVR > - 2 network printers > > Numerous other network "stuff", switches, routers, etc. All wired and > installed by me. Yes, the wires in the walls, the boxes in the walls, > and all the gear. > > I can sit in the family room with a tablet and read spreadsheets off the > server in my office upstairs, listen to music, etc. > > I can play any of 12,000+ songs from our library on the server through > our stereo (yeah, I know, no surround for me, I am kind of a Luddite > that way.). > > I can be on the deck and look at our financial files on my network on my > smart phone. > > It's called convenience. > > Someone (the wife) asks me a question? I get the most convenient device > and look it up. I do not have to heave a huge sigh and trudge up to my > office. > > I've had computers in my home since 1984 or thereabouts. > > Golly - I turned 81 in January and I have: 1 - Desktop running Windows 7 2 - Laptops running Linux Mint 0 - Smart phones 2 - HD TVs 2 - Verizon DVR's on FIOS 1 - Hard wired printer to the desktop. 1 - I-Pod 1 - Android 7" Tablet And I agree with the rest of your comments. -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Sea monkey is driving me nuts
On 4/8/2014 12:43 AM F Murtz submitted the following: > My modem (thompson tg782t) seemed to go bung (some sort of hub problem > computers both said cable unplugged but they were not, but wireless > worked)and I replaced it with another, same model,same cables, then tried to > set up seamonkey mail and newsgroups,which I have done many times over many > years successfully,But not this time. > After setting up it asks for password but rejects it. > I then set up IE,Outlook express (which I don't normally use )using same > inputs,names etc and the mail and newsgroups work perfectly with the same > password(so I know the password is correct) > So the problem seems to be between telstra,modem and sea monkey. > I have been on to telstra, even using logmein but they know nothing about > seamonkey but we proved mail works with outlook. > Can the modem reject sea monkey but allow IE and outlook to work? > can telstra not work with seamonkey but allow outlook? > > > > > --- > This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus > protection is active. > http://www.avast.com > Check your SM settings in your configuration for the Outgoing Server (SMTP). Perhaps your port, user, or password authenticating setting is incorrect. -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Sea monkey is driving me nuts
On 4/8/2014 12:43 AM F Murtz submitted the following: > My modem (thompson tg782t) seemed to go bung (some sort of hub problem > computers both said cable unplugged but they were not, but wireless > worked)and I replaced it with another, same model,same cables, then tried to > set up seamonkey mail and newsgroups,which I have done many times over many > years successfully,But not this time. > After setting up it asks for password but rejects it. > I then set up IE,Outlook express (which I don't normally use )using same > inputs,names etc and the mail and newsgroups work perfectly with the same > password(so I know the password is correct) > So the problem seems to be between telstra,modem and sea monkey. > I have been on to telstra, even using logmein but they know nothing about > seamonkey but we proved mail works with outlook. > Can the modem reject sea monkey but allow IE and outlook to work? > can telstra not work with seamonkey but allow outlook? > > > > > --- > This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus > protection is active. > http://www.avast.com > Check you SM settings in your configuration for the Outgoing Server (SMTP). Perhaps your port, user, or password authenticating setting is incorrect. -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Lost copies of sent msgs
On 3/31/2014 7:21 AM W3BNR submitted the following: > On 3/30/2014 11:34 PM Geoff Welsh submitted the following: >> Geoff Welsh wrote: >>> Geoff Welsh wrote: >>>> W3BNR wrote: >>>>> On 3/21/2014 3:32 PM W3BNR submitted the following: >>>>>> On 3/21/2014 3:28 PM W3BNR submitted the following: >>>>>>> I noticed that when I send a msg to news groups, although my >>>>>>> preference >>>>>>> is set to keep a copy in the Local Folder Sent file it is not there. >>>>>>> Nor >>>>>>> is it in the Sent file for my W3BNR folder. Where did it go? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If i change the pref to put it into the SENT file W3BNR it works. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=986946 submitted. >>>>> >>>> >>>> to W3BNR: >>>> >>>> I'll try to OS X test that on my other Mac later, this one is holding at >>>> 2.23 for several other mail bug reasons. >>>> >>>> GW >>> >>> testing with this post, from SM 2.25 on OS X >>> GW >> >> It correctly appears in Local Folders / Sent for me >> GW > > I'm using Windows 7 Home Premium edition, completely up to date. > Just tried again with same results as stated above. No luck in trying > to save it to the "Local Folders/Sent" directory but saving to the > W3BNR/Sent folder does work. The problem started in SM 2.24 or 2.25. > not sure which. > > As another observation - if I save the message before sending to the > "Local Folders/Drafts" or "Local Folders/Templates" there is no problem. > It's saved. > > And a test with my laptop which runs Linux Mint "Maya" 64 bit along with > SM 2.25 I have no problem. The message *is* saved in the "Local > Folders/Sent". > > Resolved - see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=986946 -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Lost copies of sent msgs
On 3/30/2014 11:34 PM Geoff Welsh submitted the following: > Geoff Welsh wrote: >> Geoff Welsh wrote: >>> W3BNR wrote: >>>> On 3/21/2014 3:32 PM W3BNR submitted the following: >>>>> On 3/21/2014 3:28 PM W3BNR submitted the following: >>>>>> I noticed that when I send a msg to news groups, although my >>>>>> preference >>>>>> is set to keep a copy in the Local Folder Sent file it is not there. >>>>>> Nor >>>>>> is it in the Sent file for my W3BNR folder. Where did it go? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If i change the pref to put it into the SENT file W3BNR it works. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=986946 submitted. >>>> >>> >>> to W3BNR: >>> >>> I'll try to OS X test that on my other Mac later, this one is holding at >>> 2.23 for several other mail bug reasons. >>> >>> GW >> >> testing with this post, from SM 2.25 on OS X >> GW > > It correctly appears in Local Folders / Sent for me > GW I'm using Windows 7 Home Premium edition, completely up to date. Just tried again with same results as stated above. No luck in trying to save it to the "Local Folders/Sent" directory but saving to the W3BNR/Sent folder does work. The problem started in SM 2.24 or 2.25. not sure which. As another observation - if I save the message before sending to the "Local Folders/Drafts" or "Local Folders/Templates" there is no problem. It's saved. And a test with my laptop which runs Linux Mint "Maya" 64 bit along with SM 2.25 I have no problem. The message *is* saved in the "Local Folders/Sent". -- Ed, W3BNR ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Lost copies of sent msgs
On 3/21/2014 3:32 PM W3BNR submitted the following: > On 3/21/2014 3:28 PM W3BNR submitted the following: >> I noticed that when I send a msg to news groups, although my preference >> is set to keep a copy in the Local Folder Sent file it is not there. Nor >> is it in the Sent file for my W3BNR folder. Where did it go? >> > > If i change the pref to put it into the SENT file W3BNR it works. > Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=986946 submitted. -- Ed http://JonesFarm.us/ Why do psychics have to ask you for your name? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Lost copies of sent msgs
On 3/21/2014 3:28 PM W3BNR submitted the following: > I noticed that when I send a msg to news groups, although my preference > is set to keep a copy in the Local Folder Sent file it is not there. Nor > is it in the Sent file for my W3BNR folder. Where did it go? > If i change the pref to put it into the SENT file W3BNR it works. -- Ed http://JonesFarm.us/ Every man has his price. Every price has its man. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Lost copies of sent msgs
I noticed that when I send a msg to news groups, although my preference is set to keep a copy in the Local Folder Sent file it is not there. Nor is it in the Sent file for my W3BNR folder. Where did it go? -- Ed http://JonesFarm.us/ "The cat has too much spirit to have no heart." -- Ernest Menaul ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Tagzilla
On 2/7/2014 3:48 PM Ed Mullen submitted the following: > Mr. Ed wrote: >> On 2/5/2014 11:36 AM JAS submitted the following: >>> My Tagzilla 0.7a2 and JsLib 0.1.367 worked fine in SM 2.21 but since >>> updating to SM 2.23 it is broken. I get no error message and in >>> extension it show it is loaded. Is there later versions that will >>> work or ?? >>> >> >> Suggest you try Pick-a-Tag >> http://jonesfarm.us/w3bnr/pat160b1.zip >> > > Some more info on PAT > > http://edmullen.net/mozilla/moz_sigtag.php > Thanks for the additional info Ed. I've been using it for years. And has been on my list of favorite FREE-WARE forever. -- Ed "You can't use tact with a Congressman. A congressman is a hog. You must take a stick and hit him on the snout." -Henry Adams (1838-1918) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: What is a good HTML5 video blocker?
On 1/8/2014 11:40 AM W3BNR submitted the following:
> On 1/8/2014 11:04 AM Ant submitted the following:
>> On 1/8/2014 6:49 AM PT, Ed typed:
>>
>>>> I don't want to use FlashBlock extension again since I dumped it because
>>>> both the latest SeaMonkey and Firefox web browsers have plug-in blockers
>>>> for Flash, Silverlight, etc.
>>>
>>> If you don't want to see it, in about:config set
>>> media.webm.enabled to 'false'.
>>
>> Thanks. It would be easier to have a button. :)
>
> I seen you're running SM2.23. If you have 'PrefBar' installed you can
> easily create a button of its menu. Insturctions:
>
> 1. Right click anywhere on 'PrefBar' and select 'Customize PrefBar'.
> 2. Right click anywhere in the 'Available Items' box and select 'New'.
> 3. From drop-down menu select 'Checkbox'.
> 4. Fill in the 'Checkbox' form as follows:
> a. Id:WebM
> b. Label: WebM
> c. toPrep:value
> d. fromPrep: value
> e. Hotkey:(disabled)
> 5. Click on 'Apply.
>
>
> New 'Item Name' (WebM) should now appear in the left column.
Right click on it and move it to the right column ('enabled Items')
> in what ever position you would like it to be displayed.
>
> In the meantime - enjoy whatever is left of the "Polar Vortex". (:<
>
Note corrected line above... I must start proofreading before
posting.
--
Ed, W3BNR
"Whenever a man has cast a longing eye on offices, a rottenness
begins in his conduct." -Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: What is a good HTML5 video blocker?
On 1/8/2014 11:04 AM Ant submitted the following:
> On 1/8/2014 6:49 AM PT, Ed typed:
>
>>> I don't want to use FlashBlock extension again since I dumped it because
>>> both the latest SeaMonkey and Firefox web browsers have plug-in blockers
>>> for Flash, Silverlight, etc.
>>
>> If you don't want to see it, in about:config set
>> media.webm.enabled to 'false'.
>
> Thanks. It would be easier to have a button. :)
I seen you're running SM2.23. If you have 'PrefBar' installed you can
easily create a button of its menu. Insturctions:
1. Right click anywhere on 'PrefBar' and select 'Customize PrefBar'.
2. Right click anywhere in the 'Available Items' box and select 'New'.
3. From drop-down menu select 'Checkbox'.
4. Fill in the 'Checkbox' form as follows:
a. Id:WebM
b. Label: WebM
c. toPrep:value
d. fromPrep: value
e. Hotkey:(disabled)
5. Click on 'Apply.
New 'Item Name' (WebM) should now appear in the left column.
Right click on it and move it to the left column ('enabled Items')
in what ever position you would like it to be displayed.
In the meantime - enjoy whatever is left of the "Polar Vortex". (:<
--
Ed
"Conservative, n: A statesman who is enamored of existing evils, as
distinguished from the Liberal who wishes to replace them with others."
-Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Suggestion : "Add New Tab Opening Button" in Toolbar
On 1/6/2014 2:04 PM Jens Hatlak submitted the following: > KiranBhai wrote: >> Suggestion : "Add New Tab Opening Button" in Toolbar > > There's already a bug for that: > <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156916> > > Otherwise, it should be quite easy to create and add-on offering that > functionality (adding an optional, customizable toolbar button to the > browser). > > If you want to go with the existing functionality, here's a thought: Did > you know that you can middle-click the Home button to open a new tab > with your homepage? Or middle-click the Reload button to clone the > current tab, including back/forward-history? Those buttons (or text > labels with icons off) are visible even when the tab bar is not. > > HTH > > Jens > And middle clicking an entry in bookmarks with multiple bookmarks will "open all". -- Ed, W3BNR There is no revenge so complete as forgiveness. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Forwarded email loses HTML formatting
On 12/20/2013 11:37 PM Paul B. Gallagher submitted the following: > W3BNR wrote: >> On 12/20/2013 4:12 PM BIll Spikowski submitted the following: >>> Dick Hoffman wrote: >>>> (This is probably due to something I've got set in Preferences but I >>>> can't find what it is.) I'm running SM 2.23 on a Windows XP-SP3 system. >>>> Emails sent to me in HTML appear correctly when I view them. Colors, >>>> graphics and formatting are all preserved and displayed as composed. >>>> However, if I forward the email to my wife, or to another of my email >>>> accounts, the HTML is stripped away and the message is sent in plain >>>> text, losing all original formatting. What is controlling this? Is >>>> there >>>> something I can change to retain the original formatting? >>> >>> >>> After you click "forward" but before you forward the message to your >>> wife, is the HTML formatting still present, or gone already? >>> >>> I have the same situation, and the formatting is gone already. My >>> workaround is to hold down the shift key when clicking "forward" or >>> "reply." >>> >>> If your formatting is still visible on your computer but gone when the >>> email reaches your wife, your problem is different! >> >> Yes, Shift+Forward works. An undocumented feature(?). At least I can't >> find it in the help file in any of the short-cut sections. > > There are several similar features: > > Shift-Compose creates a new HTML message. > > Shift-Reply replies in HTML to an incoming message. > > Shift-Reply All replies in HTML to all senders and recipients (From, To, > Cc, Bcc) of an incoming message. > > Shift-Forward forwards a message in HTML. > > Thanks for the additional info. -- Ed, W3BNR A first class mistake is to treat anyone as a second-class citizen. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Forwarded email loses HTML formatting
On 12/20/2013 4:12 PM BIll Spikowski submitted the following: > Dick Hoffman wrote: >> (This is probably due to something I've got set in Preferences but I >> can't find what it is.) I'm running SM 2.23 on a Windows XP-SP3 system. >> Emails sent to me in HTML appear correctly when I view them. Colors, >> graphics and formatting are all preserved and displayed as composed. >> However, if I forward the email to my wife, or to another of my email >> accounts, the HTML is stripped away and the message is sent in plain >> text, losing all original formatting. What is controlling this? Is there >> something I can change to retain the original formatting? > > > After you click "forward" but before you forward the message to your > wife, is the HTML formatting still present, or gone already? > > I have the same situation, and the formatting is gone already. My > workaround is to hold down the shift key when clicking "forward" or > "reply." > > If your formatting is still visible on your computer but gone when the > email reaches your wife, your problem is different! Yes, Shift+Forward works. An undocumented feature(?). At least I can't find it in the help file in any of the short-cut sections. Thanks for the info. -- Ed, W3BNR "I've developed a new philosophy. I only dread one day at a time." -Charles Schulz (1922-2000) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
