RE: [U2] Steve Cashman

2006-02-27 Thread Brian Leach
Larry,

Thanks. 

Steve is in hospital - I'm trying to get hold of his assistant to get this
sorted.

Brian 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Larry Hiscock
 Sent: 25 February 2006 20:25
 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 Subject: RE: [U2] Steve Cashman
 
 Y'all are just lucky I was up at midnight last night when 
 these started coming in and blocked them.  Otherwise, there 
 would have been THOUSANDS in your mailboxes this morning ;-)
 
 Larry Hiscock
 Moderator 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Louie Bergsagel
 Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2006 11:13 AM
 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 Subject: Re: [U2] Steve Cashman
 
 You'd think something so simple would be part of any list server.
 
 Maybe we need to write an mvListserver...
 
 On 2/24/06, Mark Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I'm guessing March 6. Just a hunch.
 
  I think that the list server should/could detect these and 
 terminate.
  Otherwise, they could spin out of countrol.
 
  Mark Johnson
  - Original Message -
  ...
   Does anyone know when Steve Cashman will be back in the office?
  ...
 ---
 u2-users mailing list
 u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
 ---
 u2-users mailing list
 u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] RE:Merging Unique

2006-02-27 Thread Andy Baum
P.S. We actually use this as a quick way of removing duplicates from a list, 
i.e. MERGE.LIST 0 UNION 0, as it's very quick.

Andy

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Coelho, Gregory
Sent: 26 February 2006 00:55
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] RE:Merging Unique


Hey,



I want 1st say thanks for all the help in the past - it is certainly a
factor in why I still have a job!  Can anyone let me know how I can
merge using Union and be guaranteed that I have not pulled in any
duplicate elements?  I know I can SAVING UNIQUE when constructing a
SAVE.LIST to ensure no duplicate ID's.  Can I do something similar when
merging?



Thanks,



Greg
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


**
The contents of this e-mail are subject to contract in all cases and William 
Hill PLC, its subsidiaries or affiliates make no contractual commitment save 
where confirmed by hard copy.  

The contents of this e-mail do not necessarily represent the views of William 
Hill PLC, its subsidiaries or affiliates.  We accept no liability, including 
liability for negligence, in respect of any statement in this e-mail. 
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential, may be subject 
to legal privilege and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity 
to which they are addressed.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any use or dissemination of this communication is strictly 
prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us 
immediately, then delete this e-mail.  

Please note that William Hill can accept no responsibility for viruses and it 
is your responsibility to scan any emails and their attachments.

This message was from William Hill PLC whose registered office is Greenside 
House, 50 Station Road, Wood Green, London N22 7TP.  Company Registration 
Number: 4212563 England.
**
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] RE:Merging Unique

2006-02-27 Thread Andy Baum
Greg,

MERGE.LIST removes all duplicates and sorts the keys, it's a feature of how it 
is implemented.

Cheers,

Andy

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Coelho, Gregory
Sent: 26 February 2006 00:55
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] RE:Merging Unique


Hey,



I want 1st say thanks for all the help in the past - it is certainly a
factor in why I still have a job!  Can anyone let me know how I can
merge using Union and be guaranteed that I have not pulled in any
duplicate elements?  I know I can SAVING UNIQUE when constructing a
SAVE.LIST to ensure no duplicate ID's.  Can I do something similar when
merging?



Thanks,



Greg
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


**
The contents of this e-mail are subject to contract in all cases and William 
Hill PLC, its subsidiaries or affiliates make no contractual commitment save 
where confirmed by hard copy.  

The contents of this e-mail do not necessarily represent the views of William 
Hill PLC, its subsidiaries or affiliates.  We accept no liability, including 
liability for negligence, in respect of any statement in this e-mail. 
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential, may be subject 
to legal privilege and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity 
to which they are addressed.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any use or dissemination of this communication is strictly 
prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us 
immediately, then delete this e-mail.  

Please note that William Hill can accept no responsibility for viruses and it 
is your responsibility to scan any emails and their attachments.

This message was from William Hill PLC whose registered office is Greenside 
House, 50 Station Road, Wood Green, London N22 7TP.  Company Registration 
Number: 4212563 England.
**
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] RE:Merging Unique

2006-02-27 Thread George Gallen
What the advantage of the MERGE.LIST is it will sort/merge ANYTHING in the 
lists,
whereas SELECT will only lists that are @ID's.

So, you could say:

SELECT SOMEFILE SAVING UNIQUE EMAILS TO 1
SELECT SOMEOTHERFILE SAVING UNIQUE EMAILS TO 2
MERGE.LIST 1 UNION 2
SAVE.LIST BIGEMAILLIST

And it would be sorted (not by domain), and there won't be a duplicate

George

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andy Baum
 Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 4:30 AM
 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 Subject: RE: [U2] RE:Merging Unique
 
 
 Greg,
 
 MERGE.LIST removes all duplicates and sorts the keys, it's a 
 feature of how it is implemented.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Andy
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


[U2] Expressions of Interest - Troy MI

2006-02-27 Thread Ross Ferris
G'day,

Just thought I would go on a fishing trip to see if there are any
entrepreneurial individuals, or companies that may be interested in
working on an opportunity in this region.

Travel will be involved with remote sites in Texas, Georgia, Ohio 
Arizona - we have a solution that we can provide remote training 
support for, but need to have feet on the streets.

If successful, may present interesting growth opportunities.
Interested?
Drop an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also consider people in other
states listed)

Ross Ferris
Stamina Software
Visage  Better by Design!
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


[U2] Trouble writing to a file w/ trigger over NFA

2006-02-27 Thread Wendy Smoak
I'm having trouble writing to a file opened with NFA.  The file has an
update trigger, and I get:

WRITING TO RECORD TEST IN AS1.PERSON
Unable to open any log files.
Unable to open any log files.
ERROR WRITING TO TEST IN AS1.PERSON
Unable to open any log files.
Unable to open any log files.
Unable to open any log files.
:

(The two uppercase lines are my CRT statements.)

I can write to a plain file (no trigger) with no problems.

Any ideas?

Thanks,
--
Wendy
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


[U2] [UD] Escaping a Quote

2006-02-27 Thread Kevin King
Unidata 6.1: Is there a way to escape a character in a SELECT
literal?  Though I can't see it in the documentation, I know you can
quote with the  or \ characters, but what if the literal contains
both  and \ characters?  What then?  Or what if the value contains a
^ or [ or ? that aren't to be interpreted by the query engine?
 
???
 
-Kevin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.PrecisOnline.com
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] - Java - AJAX

2006-02-27 Thread Glen Batchelor
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brutzman, Bill
 Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 10:57 AM
 To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org'
 Subject: RE: [U2] - Java - AJAX
 
 I expect that they will post it in the near term at www.javasig.com.
 
 Ben demo'd AJAX techniques by coding from scratch with the IntelliJ IDE on
 a
 Mac notebook, in front of the ~250 attendees there, an AJAX zip code
 lookup
 thing.  He talked about synchronous vs asynchronous client-host
 communications.  He talked about Google maps.  While it seems to be the
 best
 location mapping software, and although there have been a lot of oohs and
 ahhs from the market, he demoed some reverse-engineered 250 lines of code
 to
 do Google maps can be written by mere mortals in two hours.
 
 While I care about Swing a lot, most of the attendees were more interested
 in web-browser clients.  To wrap up, Ben mentioned the dilema choosing
 between say Swing and AJAX.  Ben indicated that at Sun and other places,
 people are working on frameworks for filthy-rich clients.  Thus, even
 though the browser clients can be made to be more robust via AJAX
 techniques, multi-media Java tools and clients having much more oomph and
 are expected to appear by say September-2006.
 
 I like Swing-clients for in-house use and browser-clients for remote
 users.
 
 Ben highlighted some of the advanced features of Mozilla's Firefox useful
 to
 AJAX developers.  Following his meeting at Redmond, Ben indicated that
 Microsoft does not expect to have some of this functionality available to
 the public for maybe one year.
 
 --Bill

So, based on all of that I get the feeling that:

1) Microsoft is not going to remove the 'read-only' aspects of important DOM
elements that everyone has been complaining about and that every other
browser supports.

2) The market still won't admit that web browsers have a _lot_ of
limitations when implemented as user interfaces. Instead, it's best to keep
re-molding the same technologies until enough people put it into commercial
products. Then it can be called a mainstream technology and the market can
be changed by direct force.

Gah. I'm totally sick of web development. Just building a navigation
structure that won't break in situation Z is a total PITA these days. And
NOooo, you can't have just a plain-jane text-based web site anymore. It
has to be intuitive and visually appealing. Whatever happen to plain
`ole cross-the-board-functionality? I guess the good `ole days went out when
the browser wars started. :/

Glen
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] [UD] Escaping a Quote

2006-02-27 Thread karlp
If my memory serves me I believe you can do something like this:

EQU QT = char(39)
EQU DQT = char(34)

then do:

VAR2 = \DQT:QT:VAR1:QT:DQT\

At least something similar.

Karl


quote who=Kevin King
 Unidata 6.1: Is there a way to escape a character in a SELECT
 literal?  Though I can't see it in the documentation, I know you can
 quote with the  or \ characters, but what if the literal contains
 both  and \ characters?  What then?  Or what if the value contains a
 ^ or [ or ? that aren't to be interpreted by the query engine?

 ???

 -Kevin
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.PrecisOnline.com
 ---
 u2-users mailing list
 u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/



-- 
karl

 _/  _/  _/  _/_/_/      __o
_/ _/   _/  _/_/   _-\._
   _/_/_/  _/_/_/ (_)/ (_)
  _/ _/   _/  _/   ..
 _/   _/ arl _/_/_/  _/ earson[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
IT Director, ATS Industrial Supply, Inc.
http://www.atsindustrial.com
Toll-free: 800-789-9300 x29
Direct2Desk: 801-978-4429
Facsimile: 801-972-3888
--
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] [UD] Escaping a Quote

2006-02-27 Thread Dana Baron
You can use single quotes in the SELECT statement. 

Example: SELECT FILE.NAME WITH @ID EQ '1234' 

will select the record with an id equal 1234 in quotes.

(I tried it and it worked)

Dana Baron
System Manager
Smugglers' Notch Resort


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin King
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 12:32 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] [UD] Escaping a Quote

Unidata 6.1: Is there a way to escape a character in a SELECT
literal?  Though I can't see it in the documentation, I know you can
quote with the  or \ characters, but what if the literal contains
both  and \ characters?  What then?  Or what if the value contains a
^ or [ or ? that aren't to be interpreted by the query engine?
 
???
 
-Kevin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.PrecisOnline.com
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


[U2] Universe: Version and serial number

2006-02-27 Thread Martin Scholl
How do I get version and serial number from a UniVerse AIX installation?  I
am drawing a blank here.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] Universe: Version and serial number

2006-02-27 Thread asvin . dattani
CONFIG ALL from TCL

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 27/02/2006 18:10:30:

 How do I get version and serial number from a UniVerse AIX installation? 
 I
 am drawing a blank here.
 ---
 u2-users mailing list
 u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


HSBC Bank plc may be solicited in the course of its placement efforts for 
a new issue, by investment clients of the firm for whom the Bank as a firm 
already provides other services. It may equally decide to allocate to its 
own proprietary book or with an associate of HSBC Group. This represents a 
potential conflict of interest. HSBC Bank plc has internal arrangements 
designed to ensure that the firm would give unbiased and full advice to 
the corporate finance client about the valuation and pricing of the 
offering as well as internal systems, controls and procedures to identify 
and manage conflicts of interest.

HSBC Bank plc
Registered Office: 8 Canada Square, London E14 5HQ, United Kingdom
Registered in England - Number 14259
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.




-
This transmission has been issued by a member of the HSBC Group HSBC
for the information of the addressee only and should not be reproduced
and/or distributed to any other person. Each page attached hereto must
be read in conjunction with any disclaimer which forms part of it.
Unless otherwise stated, this transmission is neither an offer nor the
solicitation of an offer to sell or purchase any investment. Its
contents are based on information obtained from sources believed to be
reliable but HSBC makes no representation and accepts no responsibility
or liability as to its completeness or accuracy.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Email has different SMTP TO: and MIME TO: fields in the email addresses - [U2] Steve Cashman

2006-02-27 Thread vance . alspach
Is anybody else receiving duplicate emails from this weekend?  I have 
received this same email 3 times since Saturday.


Vance Alspach
J  L Industrial Supply




Nick Cipollina [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
02/25/2006 07:51 AM
Please respond to
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org


To
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
cc

Subject
[U2] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Email has different SMTP TO: and MIME TO:  fields in 
the email addresses - [U2] Steve Cashman






Does anyone know when Steve Cashman will be back in the office?



Nick Cipollina



Pick Programmer

ACS Heritage, Inc.

2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210

Richmond, VA 23294

(804)965-8294
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] dup emails rec'd

2006-02-27 Thread Allen E. Elwood
Not only are they duplicate, but one of the dup emails from me had a
*different subject* text than when I originally sent the message!!??

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 10:12
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Email has different SMTP TO: and MIME
TO: fields in the email addresses - [U2] Steve Cashman


Is anybody else receiving duplicate emails from this weekend?  I have
received this same email 3 times since Saturday.


Vance Alspach
J  L Industrial Supply




Nick Cipollina [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
02/25/2006 07:51 AM
Please respond to
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org


To
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
cc

Subject
[U2] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Email has different SMTP TO: and MIME TO:  fields in
the email addresses - [U2] Steve Cashman






Does anyone know when Steve Cashman will be back in the office?



Nick Cipollina



Pick Programmer

ACS Heritage, Inc.

2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210

Richmond, VA 23294

(804)965-8294
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] Universe: Version and serial number

2006-02-27 Thread Clifton Oliver

Will give you the license (serial) number. To get the version, at TCL


.l RELLEVEL



Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


CONFIG ALL from TCL

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 27/02/2006 18:10:30:


How do I get version and serial number from a UniVerse AIX installation?

I

am drawing a blank here.
---

---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Steve Cashman

2006-02-27 Thread Larry Hiscock
Hi Brian,

I've already unsubscribed him from the lists on Saturday evening (my time),
so we shouldn't be seeing any more of these.

--Larry

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Leach
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 12:58 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Steve Cashman

Larry,

Thanks. 

Steve is in hospital - I'm trying to get hold of his assistant to get this
sorted.

Brian 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Larry Hiscock
 Sent: 25 February 2006 20:25
 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 Subject: RE: [U2] Steve Cashman
 
 Y'all are just lucky I was up at midnight last night when 
 these started coming in and blocked them.  Otherwise, there 
 would have been THOUSANDS in your mailboxes this morning ;-)
 
 Larry Hiscock
 Moderator 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Louie Bergsagel
 Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2006 11:13 AM
 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 Subject: Re: [U2] Steve Cashman
 
 You'd think something so simple would be part of any list server.
 
 Maybe we need to write an mvListserver...
 
 On 2/24/06, Mark Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I'm guessing March 6. Just a hunch.
 
  I think that the list server should/could detect these and 
 terminate.
  Otherwise, they could spin out of countrol.
 
  Mark Johnson
  - Original Message -
  ...
   Does anyone know when Steve Cashman will be back in the office?
  ...
 ---
 u2-users mailing list
 u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
 ---
 u2-users mailing list
 u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Universe: Version and serial number

2006-02-27 Thread Hennessey, Mark F.
snip
How do I get version and serial number from a UniVerse AIX installation?  I
am drawing a blank here.
/snip

At the TCL prompt, enter CONFIG... that will give you the serial number.

Then do a .L RELLEVEL at the TCL. This will give you version/release number 
as well as flavor information.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Email has different SMTP TO: and MIME TO: fields in the email addresses - [U2] Steve Cashman

2006-02-27 Thread leslie chamberlin
Yes and it is driving me crazy.  It's like watching TV the week after
sweeps week!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 12:12 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Email has different SMTP TO: and MIME
TO: fields in the email addresses - [U2] Steve Cashman

Is anybody else receiving duplicate emails from this weekend?  I have 
received this same email 3 times since Saturday.


Vance Alspach
J  L Industrial Supply




Nick Cipollina [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
02/25/2006 07:51 AM
Please respond to
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org


To
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
cc

Subject
[U2] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Email has different SMTP TO: and MIME TO:  fields
in 
the email addresses - [U2] Steve Cashman






Does anyone know when Steve Cashman will be back in the office?



Nick Cipollina



Pick Programmer

ACS Heritage, Inc.

2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210

Richmond, VA 23294

(804)965-8294
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Email has different SMTP TO: and MIME TO: fields in the email addresses - [U2] Steve Cashman

2006-02-27 Thread Dianne Ackerman

Yes, it is pretty annoying, isn't it?
-Dianne

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Is anybody else receiving duplicate emails from this weekend?  I have 
received this same email 3 times since Saturday.



Vance Alspach
J  L Industrial Supply

---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Email has different SMTP TO: and MIME TO: fields in the email addresses - [U2] Steve Cashman

2006-02-27 Thread Louie Bergsagel
This happened with another email list I was on, where all current and former
subscribers to the University of Washington's World Dance list were getting
every email that was sent to the list server.  And when they sent TAKE ME
OFF YOUR LIST!!! email to the list server, that also went to every current
and former subscriber.

It was quite frustrating to some, but I thought it was hilarious, and sent
that thought to the list server, which broadcast it to everyone.

Many people replied saying they appreciated my take on the situation, and I
met several fine people that day, from as far away as Cornell (he used to
live in Seattle).

So let me repeat myself:  Chill!  This is fun! Maybe Steve our U2UG will
take us all out to dinner!  Or he'll pay us $1.23 for every email we forward
to Bill Gates.

*:)*

-- Louie Bergsagel



On 2/27/06, Dianne Ackerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yes, it is pretty annoying, isn't it?
 -Dianne

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Is anybody else receiving duplicate emails from this weekend?  I have
 received this same email 3 times since Saturday.
 
 
 Vance Alspach
 J  L Industrial Supply
 ---
 u2-users mailing list
 u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


[U2] Changes to mail list configurations

2006-02-27 Thread Larry Hiscock
We have made some changes to the mailing list configuration files in an
attempt to reduce some of the problems we have been experiencing these past
few days.

There have been two primary problems (one of which has resulted in old mail
getting reposted to the list several days after it was originally posted).

The first problem, which I know EVERYONE has seen first hand is the
proliferation of out of the office replies to the list from brain-dead
mailers.  The other problem is that we have been seeing an inordinately
large number of bounce messages from various smtp servers indicating that
mail could not be delivered due to too many hops, indicating a mail loop.
A common cause of mail loops is smtp servers that don't understand the
difference between an envelope address and a 'reply-to' address.

To alleviate these problems, we have made a change to the configuration of
all of the u2ug hosted mailing lists (u2-users, u2-community, rbsolutions
and sbsolutions, and all of their digests) to remove the 'reply-to' header
from all outgoing list messages.

What does this mean to you?  It means this:

* If you click 'reply' to respond to a list message, your response will go
ONLY to the original sender of the message.  

* If you click 'reply to ALL', your reply will go to BOTH the original
sender AND back to the list.  

This means that you will need to pay a little more attention to how you
reply to messages.  It also means that you may end up receiving two copies
of responses to any message you post: one from the list, and one directly
from the responder.

This also means that 'out of office' replies should be sent ONLY to the the
originator of any given messages, NOT back to the list.  The more you post
to the list, the more you'll hear from Mr. Cashman ;-)

We apologize for any confusion this may cause, but we felt it was necessary,
and a reasonable trade-off to help alleviate the other issues.

Regards,

Larry Hiscock
Moderator
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Email has different SMTP TO: and MIME TO: fields in the email addresses - RE: [U2] Steve Cashman

2006-02-27 Thread Jerry Banker
There is another option. Don't use auto-response messages. After all if the 
people in your office don't know you're gone then you've got to start 
interfacing more with the people you work with. If they don't notice when 
you're gone then they probably don't notice when you're there.


- Original Message - 
From: Glen B [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2006 2:57 PM
Subject: [U2] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Email has different SMTP TO: and MIME TO: 
fields in the email addresses - RE: [U2] Steve Cashman




 It's not as simple as you might think. There have been long heated
discussions about how to deal with vacation auto-responders on lists -
including Majordomo. In the end, there's 2 options:

1) A subject filter that drops all messages with out of the office and
away on vacation somewhere in the subject. That will also kill real
postings with the strings in them. Also, various away responders may have
different subject styles so the rules you implement may only work 50% of 
the
time. As the list grows, the chances of a variety of vacation clutter 
grows.


2) The second option, which is typical for people who openly use mailing
lists, is to set up your auto-responder to not send 'away' replies to 
e-mail

addresses that are mailing lists. That can be done with partial address
matching or by specifying the e-mail addresses manually. It only takes one
step, by you or your mail admin, and it's dealt with for good.

It would be great if people in very active lists, like U2-users, took the
time to exclude their list subscriptions from their auto-responders.

Glen

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Louie Bergsagel
Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2006 2:13 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Steve Cashman


You'd think something so simple would be part of any list server.

Maybe we need to write an mvListserver...

On 2/24/06, Mark Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I'm guessing March 6. Just a hunch.

I think that the list server should/could detect these and terminate.
Otherwise, they could spin out of countrol.

Mark Johnson
- Original Message -
...
 Does anyone know when Steve Cashman will be back in the office?
...

---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ 

---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] - Java - AJAX

2006-02-27 Thread Tony Gravagno
I share Glen's frustration with the increasing dependency on browsers and
increasing complexity being built into them.  I'll add a decreasing
appreciation for the effort required to support this technology.  This
results in many people expecting that just because everyone has a browser
on their desktop that creating a rich client experience is somehow easy,
low-cost, and/or fast to develop.  Thankfully our clients have more
realistic expectations than some of the people who don't sign with us for
development services.

I've started a low-noise, content-oriented blog which has a lot of info on
Ajax, GUI development, .NET, and other topics.  I will continue to provide
insight and code to assist others doing similar work.

removethisNebula-RnD.com/blog

Until further notice, I have a login process to enter the blog site. The
user is blog, password is tony. This is just to deter unwelcome
visitors until I'm sure the site is production quality.

Please read the initial Welcome note and follow the links for more info. If
you'd like to comment you must Register using the link on the main page.
Complete info for registration and using the site is available from the
How to use this Site link on the main page.

Comments always welcome.
Thank you kindly,
Tony
TG@ removethisNebula-RnD.com
(Again, I mask domain names to avoid spam since these forums are open to
email address harvesting and subsequent increases in spam - sorry for the
inconvenience but it works.)
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] [UD] Escaping a Quote

2006-02-27 Thread Kevin King
In a SELECT literal? 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 11:02 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] [UD] Escaping a Quote

If my memory serves me I believe you can do something like this:

EQU QT = char(39)
EQU DQT = char(34)

then do:

VAR2 = \DQT:QT:VAR1:QT:DQT\

At least something similar.

Karl


quote who=Kevin King
 Unidata 6.1: Is there a way to escape a character in a SELECT 
 literal?  Though I can't see it in the documentation, I know you can

 quote with the  or \ characters, but what if the literal contains 
 both  and \ characters?  What then?  Or what if the value contains
a 
 ^ or [ or ? that aren't to be interpreted by the query engine?

 ???

 -Kevin
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.PrecisOnline.com
 ---
 u2-users mailing list
 u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/



--
karl

 _/  _/  _/  _/_/_/      __o
_/ _/   _/  _/_/   _-\._
   _/_/_/  _/_/_/ (_)/ (_)
  _/ _/   _/  _/   ..
 _/   _/ arl _/_/_/  _/ earson[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
IT Director, ATS Industrial Supply, Inc.
http://www.atsindustrial.com
Toll-free: 800-789-9300 x29
Direct2Desk: 801-978-4429
Facsimile: 801-972-3888
--
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.1.0/269 - Release Date:
2/24/2006
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


[U2] Re: Trouble writing to a file over NFA

2006-02-27 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 2/27/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'm having trouble writing to a file opened with NFA.  The file has an
 update trigger, and I get:

 Unable to open any log files.

Well, it's not the trigger.  I switched to the backup server, and saw
the same result.  Then I removed the trigger, and I *still* can't
write to the PERSON file.

What else could be different about two files that would make it
possible to write to one but not the other?

I'm picking files at random, setting up FX type VOC pointers and
testing whether I can read and write with NFA.  Some I can, some, I
can't... and so far I don't see a pattern.

Any ideas, even random guessing, is appreciated.  (Yes, I'm trying to
avoid calling my VAR.  They don't use NFA, and it was hard enough to
get them to sell it to us in the first place.)

Thanks,
--
Wendy
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Changes to mail list configurations

2006-02-27 Thread Tony Gravagno
This is breaking all kinds of things including filters, remailers, and
maybe threading for some reader programs.  It's going to create confusion
when people mail to one another off-list.  And for anyone who isn't
familiar with this completely unique solution people are going to think
they're responding to a list when they're responding to some person - and
we might start seeing ongoing inquiries about hey, where did my response
go?  Sorry folks but I don't believe this is a good long-term solution.  I
think we should go back to the way it was until a more standard solution
can be found.

Tony

Larry Hiscock wrote:
 We have made some changes to the mailing list configuration files in
 an attempt to reduce some of the problems we have been experiencing
 these past few days.
...
 What does this mean to you?  It means this:
 
 * If you click 'reply' to respond to a list message, your response
 will go ONLY to the original sender of the message.
 
 * If you click 'reply to ALL', your reply will go to BOTH the original
 sender AND back to the list.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] Changes to mail list configurations

2006-02-27 Thread Craig Bennett

Unusually, I agree with Tony.
Perhaps we should have talked on the list before making a change like this?

Craig
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Changes to mail list configurations

2006-02-27 Thread Tony Gravagno
This is breaking all kinds of things including filters, remailers, and
maybe threading for some reader programs.  It's going to create confusion
when people mail to one another off-list.  And for anyone who isn't
familiar with this completely unique solution people are going to think
they're responding to a list when they're responding to some person - and
we might start seeing ongoing inquiries about hey, where did my response
go?  (I'm resending this post precisely because the original was mailed
incorrectly due to the change.)  Sorry folks but I don't believe this is a
good long-term solution.  I think we should go back to the way it was until
a more standard solution can be found.

Tony
 
 Larry Hiscock wrote:
 We have made some changes to the mailing list configuration files in
 an attempt to reduce some of the problems we have been experiencing
 these past few days.
 ...
 What does this mean to you?  It means this:
 
 * If you click 'reply' to respond to a list message, your response
 will go ONLY to the original sender of the message.
 
 * If you click 'reply to ALL', your reply will go to BOTH the
 original sender AND back to the list.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


[U2] Re: Trouble writing to a file over NFA

2006-02-27 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 2/27/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'm picking files at random, setting up FX type VOC pointers and
 testing whether I can read and write with NFA.  Some I can, some, I
 can't... and so far I don't see a pattern.

 Any ideas, even random guessing, is appreciated.  (Yes, I'm trying to
 avoid calling my VAR.  They don't use NFA, and it was hard enough to
 get them to sell it to us in the first place.)

We figured it out.  The files I can't write to have one thing in
common:  indices on I-Descriptors that run Datatel-specific Envision
code.  That code won't run if the environment isn't properly set up. 
And I have no idea how to make FR.JUMPSTART and ENVINIT run as
part of an NFA connection.

:::sigh::: All this because we could never get ODBC to work from Unix.
 Workaround in progress... writing to a temporary file and then
processing it from the Unix side where the envionment will be correct.

--
Wendy
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Changes to mail list configurations

2006-02-27 Thread Logan, David (SST - Adelaide)
Sounds like the sky is falling. This is by no means a unique
situation, this works well on numerous other lists (that I subscribe
to) so why not this one? Surely the subscribers are not that silly. I
know the average age of the Universe/Unidata afficionado is slowly
creeping upward, but this doesn't mean we can't absorb change.

My outlook filter still managed to get this into the correct folder.

Regards


---
** _/ **  David Logan 
***   _/ ***  ITO Delivery Specialist - Database
*_/*  Hewlett-Packard Australia Ltd
_/_/_/  _/_/_/    E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   _/  _/  _/  _/     Desk:   +618 8408 4273
  _/  _/  _/_/_/  Mobile: 0417 268 665
*_/   **
**  _/    Postal: 148 Frome Street,
   _/ **  Adelaide SA 5001
  Australia 
invent   
---

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno
Sent: Tuesday, 28 February 2006 8:33 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Changes to mail list configurations

This is breaking all kinds of things including filters, remailers, and
maybe threading for some reader programs.  It's going to create
confusion
when people mail to one another off-list.  And for anyone who isn't
familiar with this completely unique solution people are going to think
they're responding to a list when they're responding to some person -
and
we might start seeing ongoing inquiries about hey, where did my
response
go?  Sorry folks but I don't believe this is a good long-term solution.
I
think we should go back to the way it was until a more standard solution
can be found.

Tony

Larry Hiscock wrote:
 We have made some changes to the mailing list configuration files in
 an attempt to reduce some of the problems we have been experiencing
 these past few days.
...
 What does this mean to you?  It means this:
 
 * If you click 'reply' to respond to a list message, your response
 will go ONLY to the original sender of the message.
 
 * If you click 'reply to ALL', your reply will go to BOTH the original
 sender AND back to the list.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] - Java - AJAX

2006-02-27 Thread Dawn Wolthuis
On 2/27/06, Brutzman, Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I expect that they will post it in the near term at www.javasig.com.

 Ben demo'd AJAX techniques by coding from scratch with the IntelliJ IDE on a
 Mac notebook, in front of the ~250 attendees there, an AJAX zip code lookup
 thing.  He talked about synchronous vs asynchronous client-host
 communications.  He talked about Google maps.  While it seems to be the best
 location mapping software, and although there have been a lot of oohs and
 ahhs from the market, he demoed some reverse-engineered 250 lines of code to
 do Google maps can be written by mere mortals in two hours.

 While I care about Swing a lot, most of the attendees were more interested
 in web-browser clients.  To wrap up, Ben mentioned the dilema choosing
 between say Swing and AJAX.  Ben indicated that at Sun and other places,
 people are working on frameworks for filthy-rich clients.  Thus, even
 though the browser clients can be made to be more robust via AJAX
 techniques, multi-media Java tools and clients having much more oomph and
 are expected to appear by say September-2006.

 I like Swing-clients for in-house use and browser-clients for remote users.

I was a Swing/java person and have started learning PHP, JavaScript,
xhtml,  css.  I put  a little beginner example out there (running
with OpenQM) with all of the source code at

http://webdev.tincat-group.com/mewsings/personEmail.html

I referred to this as End-to-end AJAX in my blog entry
http://www.tincat-group.com/mewsings/2006/01/who-ordered-ripple-delete.html
.  I like the AJAX approach and I do see it is now viable to write
rich browser-based applications, but I'll admit it is no small thing
to accomplish browser-independence.   Cheers!  --dawn
--
Dawn M. Wolthuis
Tincat Group, Inc.
www.tincat-group.com

Take and give some delight today!
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Changes to mail list configurations

2006-02-27 Thread Bruce Nichol

At 14:03 27/02/06 -0800, Tony Gravagno wrote:


This is breaking all kinds of things including filters, remailers, and
maybe threading for some reader programs.  It's going to create confusion
when people mail to one another off-list.  And for anyone who isn't
familiar with this completely unique solution people are going to think
they're responding to a list when they're responding to some person - and
we might start seeing ongoing inquiries about hey, where did my response
go?  Sorry folks but I don't believe this is a good long-term solution.  I
think we should go back to the way it was until a more standard solution
can be found.

Tony


For once, Tony, I totally agree with you All U2 list postings are now 
going to my trash bucket


Please put it back to how it was...  The knee jerk goes too far t'other 
way



Larry Hiscock wrote:
 We have made some changes to the mailing list configuration files in
 an attempt to reduce some of the problems we have been experiencing
 these past few days.

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.1.1/270 - Release Date: 27/02/06


Regards,

Bruce Nichol
Talon Computer Services
ALBURYNSW 2640
Australia

http://www.taloncs.com.au

Tel: +61 (0)411149636
Fax: +61 (0)260232119

If it ain't broke, fix it till it is! 



--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.1.1/270 - Release Date: 27/02/06
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] - Java - AJAX

2006-02-27 Thread Bill Haskett
Glen:

You're a better man than I, being able to work with all these technologies!
I've given up.

People don't want what they say they want, nor do they want to minimize
costs and maximize profit.  Thanks to the educational system and current
culture everything is now form over substance.  :-)

Bill 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glen 
 Batchelor

[snipped]

 Gah. I'm totally sick of web development. Just building a naviga-
 tion structure that won't break in situation Z is a total PITA 
 these days. And NOooo, you can't have just a plain-jane text-
 based web site anymore. It has to be intuitive and visually
 appealing. Whatever happen to plain `ole cross-the-board-
 functionality? I guess the good `ole days went out when the
 browser wars started. :/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Changes to mail list configurations

2006-02-27 Thread Logan, David (SST - Adelaide)
This is a relatively minor change and the dark side of the force seem to
be gathering strength against it. The list headers still have the u2ug
address in them and your rules should still apply. If not, then change
them so they do!

Perhaps the dark side haven't really explained themselves well but I
can't understand what the fuss is about. There seem to be a number of
hypotheticals that assume people are incapable of managing change.

I would note again, this is NOT a unique list situation. This is in
fact, a more common setup than one thinks. Perhaps somebody could
subscribe to the Sun Managers list, one does not reply to the list, only
to the sender and the sender then publishes a summary, or perhaps one or
two of the MySQL lists which use exactly this system.

All lists to which I subscribe use their own methods for managing the
reply, you just get used to them. The subscribers to these lists seem to
handle the situation quite well. In fact, I note recent posters to this
list, have all managed to reply to the list without issue and my outlook
rules have placed their messages in the correct folder.

Regards


---
** _/ **  David Logan 
***   _/ ***  ITO Delivery Specialist - Database
*_/*  Hewlett-Packard Australia Ltd
_/_/_/  _/_/_/    E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   _/  _/  _/  _/     Desk:   +618 8408 4273
  _/  _/  _/_/_/  Mobile: 0417 268 665
*_/   **
**  _/    Postal: 148 Frome Street,
   _/ **  Adelaide SA 5001
  Australia 
invent   
---

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Nichol
Sent: Tuesday, 28 February 2006 9:57 AM
To: Tony Gravagno; u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Changes to mail list configurations

At 14:03 27/02/06 -0800, Tony Gravagno wrote:

This is breaking all kinds of things including filters, remailers, and
maybe threading for some reader programs.  It's going to create
confusion
when people mail to one another off-list.  And for anyone who isn't
familiar with this completely unique solution people are going to think
they're responding to a list when they're responding to some person -
and
we might start seeing ongoing inquiries about hey, where did my
response
go?  Sorry folks but I don't believe this is a good long-term
solution.  I
think we should go back to the way it was until a more standard
solution
can be found.

Tony

For once, Tony, I totally agree with you All U2 list postings are
now 
going to my trash bucket

Please put it back to how it was...  The knee jerk goes too far t'other 
way

Larry Hiscock wrote:
  We have made some changes to the mailing list configuration files in
  an attempt to reduce some of the problems we have been experiencing
  these past few days.

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.1.1/270 - Release Date: 27/02/06

Regards,

Bruce Nichol
Talon Computer Services
ALBURYNSW 2640
Australia

http://www.taloncs.com.au

Tel: +61 (0)411149636
Fax: +61 (0)260232119

If it ain't broke, fix it till it is! 


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.1.1/270 - Release Date: 27/02/06
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Changes to mail list configurations

2006-02-27 Thread Tony Gravagno
Logan, David wrote:
 Sounds like the sky is falling. This is by no means a unique
 situation, this works well on numerous other lists (that I subscribe
 to) so why not this one? Surely the subscribers are not that silly. I
 know the average age of the Universe/Unidata afficionado is slowly
 creeping upward, but this doesn't mean we can't absorb change.
 
 My outlook filter still managed to get this into the correct folder.
 
 Regards

Well, our experience is just different.  Seems a little silly to have
manual procedures to conform to some list software doesn't it?  Now when I
do get a double posting from this forum, since they both have [U2] and
other common markers, all mail gets to my U2 List folder.  I'd rather not
change my filters until someone here decides which way the wind will blow.

As an example of how this reply-all policy is not working:  I don't send
directly to the list, I send through a remailer so that my e-mail address
isn't broadcast to the world.  But that shouldn't matter to anyone else,
and it never has.  Now, I need to manually paste the right e-mail address
into the To field.  I'll accept this as something unique to me if indeed it
is, but again, I don't need to do this for any other lists - how about just
getting some listserver software that works like DadaMail?
(http://mojo.skazat.com/ free, open source, feature rich, well supported,
popular...)

It also looks like the list is accepting mail from unauthorized mail
sources.  I think I accidentally posted mail from an address not subscribed
to the list.  I dunno if this is new or not.  Without digging through
headers I can't tell exactly what happened and I don't have time for such
things.

T
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Changes to mail list configurations

2006-02-27 Thread Larry Hiscock
A) I don't understand why you would have to change anything to send your
email to the list through a remailer.

B) the list does NOT accept email from unsubscribed users.  I manually
approved your recent post that was sent from an unsubscribed address because
I felt it was germaine, and I didn't want to wait for a bounce/reply/re-post
cycle.

Larry Hiscock
Moderator

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 4:12 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Changes to mail list configurations

Logan, David wrote:
 Sounds like the sky is falling. This is by no means a unique
 situation, this works well on numerous other lists (that I subscribe
 to) so why not this one? Surely the subscribers are not that silly. I
 know the average age of the Universe/Unidata afficionado is slowly
 creeping upward, but this doesn't mean we can't absorb change.
 
 My outlook filter still managed to get this into the correct folder.
 
 Regards

Well, our experience is just different.  Seems a little silly to have
manual procedures to conform to some list software doesn't it?  Now when I
do get a double posting from this forum, since they both have [U2] and
other common markers, all mail gets to my U2 List folder.  I'd rather not
change my filters until someone here decides which way the wind will blow.

As an example of how this reply-all policy is not working:  I don't send
directly to the list, I send through a remailer so that my e-mail address
isn't broadcast to the world.  But that shouldn't matter to anyone else,
and it never has.  Now, I need to manually paste the right e-mail address
into the To field.  I'll accept this as something unique to me if indeed it
is, but again, I don't need to do this for any other lists - how about just
getting some listserver software that works like DadaMail?
(http://mojo.skazat.com/ free, open source, feature rich, well supported,
popular...)

It also looks like the list is accepting mail from unauthorized mail
sources.  I think I accidentally posted mail from an address not subscribed
to the list.  I dunno if this is new or not.  Without digging through
headers I can't tell exactly what happened and I don't have time for such
things.

T
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] Changes to mail list configurations

2006-02-27 Thread John Hester

Logan, David (SST - Adelaide) wrote:

Sounds like the sky is falling. This is by no means a unique
situation, this works well on numerous other lists (that I subscribe
to) so why not this one? Surely the subscribers are not that silly. I
know the average age of the Universe/Unidata afficionado is slowly
creeping upward, but this doesn't mean we can't absorb change.

My outlook filter still managed to get this into the correct folder.


One list I subscribe to doesn't include the list address in posted 
messages, so you can't even use the reply-all option and have to key 
in the list address.  The current setup of the U2 list is at least a 
little easier.  This particular debate has been going on for many years, 
and for those unfamiliar, see The Great Reply-to Debate section at 
this link:


http://producingoss.com/html-chunk/mailing-lists.html

There are pros and cons both ways.  I can only add that, based on my own 
experience with other lists, I got used to the posting method of the 
particular list fairly quickly even when I found it initially inconvenient.


-John
--
John Hester
System  Network Administrator
Momentum Group Inc.
(949) 833-8886 x623
http://memosamples.com
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Changes to mail list configurations

2006-02-27 Thread Bill Haskett
David:

I'm reminded of the building contractor who, when asked why there's no lock
on the front and back doors, replies that none of the other doors in the
house have locks on them...besides, you'll get used to it.

It is a constant in the IT industry that we are all forced to overcome the
lack of rationality and simplicity.  (I see where I need to change the TO
address when I click reply otherwise the reply goes to you, unless I
remember to click the Reply to All button and remove you so as to not
remind you of the consequences of responding to the list).  :-)

soapbox
This could be worse, but aren't we all tired of dealing with this constant
bull$%!t of taking different paths to process similar events (email
receipt).  I couldn't care less what Sun or MySql does; the MV market was
built on rationality not inconvenient standards de'jour, so why should we
have to twiddle with a simple reply due to some technical reason?
Argh.
/soapbox

Please forgive my attitude; I've almost completed a D3 to UniData conversion
project and have been wondering why any non-MV developer would ever use U2
and any MV developer would use UniData.  I'm sure I'll get over this soon
though.  :-)

Bill
 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Logan, David (SST - Adelaide)
 Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 3:58 PM
 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 Subject: RE: [U2] Changes to mail list configurations
 
 This is a relatively minor change and the dark side of the 
 force seem to
 be gathering strength against it. The list headers still have the u2ug
 address in them and your rules should still apply. If not, then change
 them so they do!
 
 Perhaps the dark side haven't really explained themselves well but I
 can't understand what the fuss is about. There seem to be a number of
 hypotheticals that assume people are incapable of managing change.
 
 I would note again, this is NOT a unique list situation. This is in
 fact, a more common setup than one thinks. Perhaps somebody could
 subscribe to the Sun Managers list, one does not reply to the 
 list, only
 to the sender and the sender then publishes a summary, or 
 perhaps one or
 two of the MySQL lists which use exactly this system.
 
 All lists to which I subscribe use their own methods for managing the
 reply, you just get used to them. The subscribers to these 
 lists seem to
 handle the situation quite well. In fact, I note recent 
 posters to this
 list, have all managed to reply to the list without issue and 
 my outlook
 rules have placed their messages in the correct folder.
 
 Regards
 
 
 ---
 ** _/ **  David Logan 
 ***   _/ ***  ITO Delivery Specialist - Database
 *_/*  Hewlett-Packard Australia Ltd
 _/_/_/  _/_/_/    E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    _/  _/  _/  _/     Desk:   +618 8408 4273
   _/  _/  _/_/_/  Mobile: 0417 268 665
 *_/   **
 **  _/    Postal: 148 Frome Street,
    _/ **  Adelaide SA 5001
   Australia 
 invent   
 ---
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Nichol
 Sent: Tuesday, 28 February 2006 9:57 AM
 To: Tony Gravagno; u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 Subject: RE: [U2] Changes to mail list configurations
 
 At 14:03 27/02/06 -0800, Tony Gravagno wrote:
 
 This is breaking all kinds of things including filters, 
 remailers, and
 maybe threading for some reader programs.  It's going to create
 confusion
 when people mail to one another off-list.  And for anyone who isn't
 familiar with this completely unique solution people are 
 going to think
 they're responding to a list when they're responding to some person -
 and
 we might start seeing ongoing inquiries about hey, where did my
 response
 go?  Sorry folks but I don't believe this is a good long-term
 solution.  I
 think we should go back to the way it was until a more standard
 solution
 can be found.
 
 Tony
 
 For once, Tony, I totally agree with you All U2 list postings are
 now 
 going to my trash bucket
 
 Please put it back to how it was...  The knee jerk goes too 
 far t'other 
 way
 
 Larry Hiscock wrote:
   We have made some changes to the mailing list 
 configuration files in
   an attempt to reduce some of the problems we have been 
 experiencing
   these past few days.
 
 --
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
 Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.1.1/270 - Release 
 Date: 27/02/06
 
 Regards,
 
 Bruce Nichol
 Talon Computer Services
 ALBURYNSW 2640
 Australia
 
 http://www.taloncs.com.au
 
 Tel: +61 (0)411149636
 Fax: +61 (0)260232119
 
 If it 

RE: [U2] Changes to mail list configurations

2006-02-27 Thread Logan, David (SST - Adelaide)
quote
I couldn't care less what Sun or MySql does; the MV market was
built on rationality not inconvenient standards de'jour, so why should
we
have to twiddle with a simple reply due to some technical reason?
Argh.
/quote

Sadly there is a large world out there that can't be ignored. As Larry
put it, this is the usual way that most lists use. I run a couple of
lists myself and this is normal behaviour.

Perhaps one of the reasons why there aren't that many new people coming
into the u2 arena is encapsulated in the response above. We, as a
community, need to know what else is going on in the world.
Unfortunately taking the insular path does not always work. The love of
rationality has nowt to do with the real world. 

Regards


---
** _/ **  David Logan 
***   _/ ***  ITO Delivery Specialist - Database
*_/*  Hewlett-Packard Australia Ltd
_/_/_/  _/_/_/    E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   _/  _/  _/  _/     Desk:   +618 8408 4273
  _/  _/  _/_/_/  Mobile: 0417 268 665
*_/   **
**  _/    Postal: 148 Frome Street,
   _/ **  Adelaide SA 5001
  Australia 
invent   
---

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett
Sent: Tuesday, 28 February 2006 12:02 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Changes to mail list configurations

David:

I'm reminded of the building contractor who, when asked why there's no
lock
on the front and back doors, replies that none of the other doors in the
house have locks on them...besides, you'll get used to it.

It is a constant in the IT industry that we are all forced to overcome
the
lack of rationality and simplicity.  (I see where I need to change the
TO
address when I click reply otherwise the reply goes to you, unless I
remember to click the Reply to All button and remove you so as to not
remind you of the consequences of responding to the list).  :-)

soapbox
This could be worse, but aren't we all tired of dealing with this
constant
bull$%!t of taking different paths to process similar events (email
receipt).  I couldn't care less what Sun or MySql does; the MV market
was
built on rationality not inconvenient standards de'jour, so why should
we
have to twiddle with a simple reply due to some technical reason?
Argh.
/soapbox

Please forgive my attitude; I've almost completed a D3 to UniData
conversion
project and have been wondering why any non-MV developer would ever use
U2
and any MV developer would use UniData.  I'm sure I'll get over this
soon
though.  :-)

Bill
 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Logan, David (SST - Adelaide)
 Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 3:58 PM
 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 Subject: RE: [U2] Changes to mail list configurations
 
 This is a relatively minor change and the dark side of the 
 force seem to
 be gathering strength against it. The list headers still have the u2ug
 address in them and your rules should still apply. If not, then change
 them so they do!
 
 Perhaps the dark side haven't really explained themselves well but I
 can't understand what the fuss is about. There seem to be a number of
 hypotheticals that assume people are incapable of managing change.
 
 I would note again, this is NOT a unique list situation. This is in
 fact, a more common setup than one thinks. Perhaps somebody could
 subscribe to the Sun Managers list, one does not reply to the 
 list, only
 to the sender and the sender then publishes a summary, or 
 perhaps one or
 two of the MySQL lists which use exactly this system.
 
 All lists to which I subscribe use their own methods for managing the
 reply, you just get used to them. The subscribers to these 
 lists seem to
 handle the situation quite well. In fact, I note recent 
 posters to this
 list, have all managed to reply to the list without issue and 
 my outlook
 rules have placed their messages in the correct folder.
 
 Regards
 
 
 ---
 ** _/ **  David Logan 
 ***   _/ ***  ITO Delivery Specialist - Database
 *_/*  Hewlett-Packard Australia Ltd
 _/_/_/  _/_/_/    E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    _/  _/  _/  _/     Desk:   +618 8408 4273
   _/  _/  _/_/_/  Mobile: 0417 268 665
 *_/   **
 **  _/    Postal: 148 Frome Street,
    _/ **  Adelaide SA 5001
   Australia 
 invent   
 

Re: [U2] Changes to mail list configurations

2006-02-27 Thread Bob Little

Bill Haskett wrote:

Please forgive my attitude; I've almost completed a D3 to UniData conversion
project and have been wondering why any non-MV developer would ever use U2
and any MV developer would use UniData.  


Bill
 
  
I'd like to hear more of this conversion story and the opinions it 
fostered.  Please hit reply  :)   (in keeping with the situation)


Bob Little
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] Changes to mail list configurations

2006-02-27 Thread Louie Bergsagel
Well, maybe in the spirit of democracy, the U2UG should vote for their
preference.

I like the new way myself, as it is much harder to accidently email everyone
when I just want to respond to the sender, and easier to do both.

Before, I would have to cut and paste the sender's name into the to window
if I wanted to reply only to them.  This is much easier.

And if this 53-year-old can remember the new feature, all you youngsters
should be able to also!

-- Louie


On 2/27/06, Bob Little [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Bill Haskett wrote:
  Please forgive my attitude; I've almost completed a D3 to UniData
 conversion
  project and have been wondering why any non-MV developer would ever use
 U2
  and any MV developer would use UniData.
 
  Bill
 
 
 I'd like to hear more of this conversion story and the opinions it
 fostered.  Please hit reply  :)   (in keeping with the situation)

 Bob Little
 ---
 u2-users mailing list
 u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


[U2] connection within UniVerse and Oracle

2006-02-27 Thread frederick . kuan
I am trying to establish a connection between UniVerse 10.1 ( aix unix ) 
and Oracle (Window 2003), has anyone done this before? I was told to 
either use socket connection or ODBC. It seems that it is not that easy to 
use socket connection talking to Oracle, so I am thinking of using ODBC? 
Any ideas. Thanks.

Regards
Frederick
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] Changes to mail list configurations

2006-02-27 Thread Joe Walter
- Original Message - 
From: Mark Ballinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 8:25 PM
Subject: Re: [U2] Changes to mail list configurations


 Well, geez.  If we're voting, I vote for the new way.  After all . . .

 http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

 (and, yes, I expect the response article will be referred to quickly
enough here.)

 Just about every list I belong to has had this very same discussion.  Just
about every one has switched to this new way.

 If your email reader is unable to thread because of this, then I feel
sorry for you.
 ---

Well, I'll cast a vote for the new way too.

Munging email headers - BAD

Munging anything can be dangerous to it's health - LOL

I googled 'munge' and the first hit was a link to a page indicating
Microsoft dropped the munge.exe find/replace utility from it's Resource
Kits - I guess munging just isn't cool anymore ;-)
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/