Re: STILL HANGING

[Schalk van Zyl]

Dennis,

Thanks!
We still have faith, it's just the joy that's gone!
I think you are correct, this will go away if we upgraded to 10.1.?
We are awaiting the CD's.
Meanwhile..
Schalk.

On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:45:40 +0200, Dennis Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:

Hi Schalk

Have faith! 

Perhaps an upgrade to 10.1.1 would help you, like IBM has
promised will
help us? (see my other post)
We've found Kurt Neuman at UTwo to be helpful - if he
doesn't know, he
will find out and get back to you - who is your VAR? We use
ProSol, and
find Erik de Kok friendly and knowledgeable too.
Dennis Bartlett
Hyflo
Johannesburg
-Original Message-




--
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
-
GWK BEPERK/LIMITED (REG: 1997/022252/06)
POSBUS 47 PO BOX 8730
DOUGLAS
Direkteure/Directors: NB Jacobs, FJ Lawrence, J v/d S Botes,
JH Coetzee, JGD Smit, JF Jacobs, AO Müller, JW Smit,
JP Snyman, JG Stander, JH van Dyk(MD/BD), JG Jacobs, A Müller,
Sekr/Secr: E van Niekerk.
Hierdie e-pos is onderworpe aan 'n vrywaring beskikbaar by:
http://www.gwk.co.za/DisclaimerVrywaring.asp
This e-mail is subjected to the disclaimer that can be viewed at:
http://www.gwk.co.za/DisclaimerVrywaring.asp
-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

RE: Who's using 10.1.0 on WS2K3?:

[Kurt Neumann]

<>
IBM's Product availability Matrix shows uv ver. 10.1.0 available on
WS2K3 released on 12/17/2003.  Is anyone currently running at this
version?  Any concerns or issues?
<>
There is a bug in compiler of UV 10.1.0 which is being addressed by IBM and should be 
fixed in the next sub release.
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Re: [OT] Looking for U2 owners in northern suburbs PA, USA

[Mark Johnson]

go to pickjobs.com. there's one in wilkesbarre.
- Original Message -
From: "Rich Sias" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "U2 Users Discussion List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 11:13 AM
Subject: [OT] Looking for U2 owners in northern suburbs PA, USA


> Well, I got to start my searching for gainful employment. I have used 2.5
weeks
> just working on refining the resume, it is near done soon and I need to
gather
> potential sites near where I live first.
>
> Contact me directly with places (company names) and other details if known
and
> date of last contact if old knowledge.  If you had a contact name and or
phone
> number that would be even nicer.  Can be former employers, current ones,
> customers, buyers or other contacts that you are aware they own a U2
system and
> just might need a DBA or such.
>
> Rich Sias
> --
> u2-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

[AD] Position Available

[E Y Neu]

Hello,

While this position is not primarily U2 related, experience with Epicor's
Avante ERP/MRP (on NT/UniData) would be useful.

Thank you,

Eric Y. Neu
Sr. Programmer Analyst
Zetron, Inc.





PROGRAMMER ANALYST/DATABASE ADMINISTRATOR (601-001W) 

Responsibilities:
Zetron, Inc., a recognized industry leader in providing mission-critical
communication applications has an immediate opportunity available for a
Programmer Analyst/Database Administrator responsible for operations of
systems and databases and maintenance and enhancement of programs. This
position is a combination of duties including CRM programmer analyst,
Business Analyst, SQL Server Database Administrator, VB and T-SQL Programmer
(advanced), and Production Support.

- Analyze and correct problems to ensure business continuity to provide high
system uptimes.
- Maintain an accurate log of system requests to allow for effective
communication with end users.
- Develop and program cost-effective and timely applications and
enhancements to add value to our business.
- Write documentation for all changes, enhancements and procedures and
ensure code revision control.
- Act as primary support for system users to provide support as per agreed
service level agreements.
- Work with other programmers to ensure reliable real time integration
between corporate business systems.
- Maintain reliability of databases by installing upgrades and configuring
system parameters.
- Work with users to determine requirement for system enhancements.
- Provide secondary user support for other IT business systems.
- Ensure reliability of database backups.
- Provide excellent customer service in support of our business by keeping
all users updated with system request status and completion dates.
- Perform basic project management duties including identifying and
following project task and activity schedules. 

Requirements:
- Ability to define end-user requirements with customers.
- Use of data modeling techniques, database design and
administration---entity relationship design, database diagramming, advanced
T-SQL and VB, building Triggers and Stored Procedures, Data Transformation
(DTS), Indexing and Database Optimization Strategies, DB Configuration,
Backup and Recovery, Performance Tuning, Application Integration.
- Familiarity with eFrontOffice CRM system by Epicor (Clientele) from
installation issues through configuration and development.
- Desired Application Experience: Avante by Epicor (ERP/MRP Systems), MS
Access, Web Development, .NET Framework
- IT Project Management also desired.
- Education: Business, math, and communication skills as acquired with a
four-year degree.
- Experience: Five years progressively responsible experience in a database
administrative environment.

All candidates must be eligible to work in the U.S.

Please forward your resume directly through our web site link at:
http://www.zetron.com/pages/english/aboutz/apply.html .

No phone calls, agencies, or third parties.

Zetron is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity employer. LOCATION:
Redmond WA USA 




  

-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

[UV] How much do you pay for support each year?

[jimmay h]

Our VAR just sent our UniVerse support bill for next year.  We are running 
UniVerse 10.0.0.1 on Windows 2000 Sever.
It is $72/user license.  With 60 licenses, that is $4320,  plus the windows 
support at 865.00.

We used them for some support over the year, but mostly it was related to 
their installation of UV on the server prior to shipping it to us.  We're 
located on the west coast and their support was in the east coast of the US. 
 So, sometimes their support was slow in responding.

They are not our software vendor, they just sold us the server and UniVerse.

What are my options?
Can we purchase support directly from IBM?
Any ideas?

_
Click, drag and drop. My MSN is the simple way to design your homepage. 
http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200364ave/direct/01/

--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

RE: The aforementioned and promised NAG about OVERQUOTING

[Ken Wallis]

on Thursday, February 19, 2004 5:38 AM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Well, Ray has spoken, so I guess that makes it gospel. Top posting is
> "wrong-posting", and only newbies who don't know any better do it.

I think Charlie is write to point out that dogmatism on any matter is
usually wrong.  Ray raises some good points, and follows a set of rules for
posting that I normally adhere to.  But, I agree with Charlie that there are
times when top-posting seems the best way to communicate.

>  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> The byte flow problem, is the one that directly affects Cliff and the
> digests.  Unfortunately, 99.% of Top-Posters neglect to trim the
> quoted message to the relevant material.  That wastes huge amounts of
> bandwidth. [snip] There really are no valid reasons to top-post, but
> there are plenty of valid reasons to inter-post and trim the quoted
> material.

Now, here's the nub of the matter IMHO.  Frankly I don't care if people top-
or bottom- or inter- post, but I find it highly annoying when posters can't
be bothered to trim what they are quoting.

Below are some examples I've seen here recently.  Note that the person being
quoted is rarely at fault here, it is usually the quoter, not the quotee.

I particularly dislike it when people quote Microsoft's entire attribution
header:

> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 5:38 AM
> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] The aforementioned and promised NAG
> about OVERQUOTING

along with the earlier poster's salutations:

> Folks,

and their closures and sigs:

> Thanks
>
>
> Mike Henderson
> --
> -
> Senior Analyst / Programmer, Corporate Applications
> Communications & Information Systems Branch
> New Zealand Defence Force
> DDI: +64 4 2371 828
> Fax: +64 4 2371 807
> Mob: +64 21 300 654

and even disclaimers from their corporate entity/ISP:

> The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended
> for the addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not
> necessarily the official views or opinions of the New Zealand
> Defence Force.
> If you are not the intended recipient you must not use,
> disclose, copy or
> distribute this message or the information in it.
>
> If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone
> the sender immediately. --

Jerry Banker wrote:

> If it's not at the top it generally goes in the deleted
> folder. I haven't
> got time to go searching through the text for an answer.

Well, if that is the case Jerry, and I realise you'll have binned this
before reaching this point, you should understand how frustrating it is for
the rest of us.

There are options in Outlook under E-Mail Options where you can specify not
to include the original text in any reply.  PLEASE, if you aren't going to
trim the context, use that option, and simply post your reply standalone.

Alternatively, there are two good freeware tools you can use which let you
fix up the way OE and Outlook do quoting and attributions automatically -
sadly though, they'll only do it on the way out, they won't fix stuff other
people send you!

Here are the URLs:

Outlook Express: http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/
Outlook 2000+: http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/outlook-quotefix/

Cheers,

Ken


-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Double-byte on UD question

[Bruce Lunt]

Hi All,

I am researching the possibility of whether our application system, written 
in SB+ running on Unidata on HPUX on HP9000, can be "enhanced" with 
double-byte characters so that we could use Chinese characters in our Taiwan 
location. Is it possible? If it is not possible with the current 
configuration could it work if we moved to Windows? Or Linux? Or maybe some 
sort of screen-scraper VB application?

I was hoping that somewhere out there this has already been addressed 
successfully.

Thanks in advance for any help that is provided.

Regards,

R. Bruce Lunt

_
Find and compare great deals on Broadband access at the MSN High-Speed 
Marketplace. http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200360ave/direct/01/

--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Avoid using AIX extended shared memory with large UniData sites

[Wally Terhune]

Ken Wallis wrote (different thread):
With decent tuning you should be able to find a reasonable compromise
between making lots of memory available for big jobs without lumbering
little jobs with a huge footprint.  Even on AIX now there are some extended
shared memory facilities which allow you to have more segments instead of
just making them all huge!  I can't remember the exact details but EXTSHM
rings a bell.
__

My comment:
Due to the way UniData uses shared memory (eg - all udt processes have to
attach the smm - ctl (global control table) segment) and the way AIX
implemented extended shared memory (memory mapped files), there can be
performance issues (contention for access to a single segment). This was
identified at a site running 12-1500 users, but I imagine it would raise
its ugly head at smaller sites as well. In spite of suggesting this when I
originally wrote a white paper on UniData and AIX, we no longer recommend
implementing it.

Wally Terhune
Manager - U2 Advanced Technical Support
IBM Data Management Solutions
Tel: 303.294.4866 Fax: 303.294.4832
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.ibm.com/software/data/u2/support - Open, Query, Update, Search -
Online!--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

RE: [UV] Fully Qualified Logon Names - EMERGANCY - HELP

[Glenn W. Paschal]

Thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank
you

I know about the message thing, but as we are doing an upgrade, and the
existing software depended on short usernames...

Again,
Thanks.

--Glenn.

<>
There is a setting in UniVerse somewhere that tells it whether or not to use
DOMAIN/username or just username. 

IIRC there is a registery setting in Windows for this. Have a look at the
readme file for the version you have it's mentioned there.

It is HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE > Software > Informix > UniVerse > CurrentVersion

Then you will probably need to created a new DWORD value with the name
UseShortUserNames.

But it does mean you can no longer use the mesage command to all users in
the local domain because that name is no longer there.


--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

RE: [UV] paragraph labels

[Stuart Boydell]

> IF  THEN GO OUT
>
> ...however, there is no OUT: label in the paragraph. Somehow,
> this works. Is "OUT" some kinda built-in label?

Don't think so, it seems like any undefined label will abort from the
paragraph.














**
This email message and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of addressed recipient(s). If you have 
received this email in error please notify the Spotless IS Support Centre (61 3 9269 
7555) immediately who will advise further action.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been scanned
for the presence of computer viruses.
**

-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

RE: UNCLASSIFIED RE: [UV] Fully Qualified Logon Names - EMERGEN CY - HELP

[Richard Wilson]

It's in the registry. HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE -> SOFTWARE-> IBM -> UniVerse
-> CurrentVersion
Create a DWORD value 1 Key of UseShortUserNames

-Original Message-
From: HENDERSON MICHAEL MR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 20 February 2004 9:59 AM
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: UNCLASSIFIED RE: [UV] Fully Qualified Logon Names - EMERGENCY -
HELP


UV.LOGINS file?

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Glenn W. Paschal
> Sent: Friday, 20 February 2004 11:44 a.m.
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [UV] Fully Qualified Logon Names - EMERGANCY - HELP
> Importance: High
> 
> 
> Ok, this is a very simple question, and I know I ought to 
> know the answer, but it's been too long since I've done one... 
>  
> There is a setting in UniVerse somewhere that tells it 
> whether or not to use DOMAIN/username or just username.
>  
> I want username.  After my upgrade, I have DOMAIN/username.  
> How do I fix it?
>  
> You expedient assistance is appreciated.
>  
> Glenn W. Paschal
> PasTech LLC
> Computer Consulting
> ph. (931) 526-9631
> fx. (931) 526-9678
> email.   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> web.   www.pastech.net

The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended
for the addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not
necessarily the official views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence Force.
If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or 
distribute this message or the information in it.

If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone
the sender immediately.
-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Re: [UV] Fully Qualified Logon Names - EMERGANCY - HELP

[Tony Wood]

- Original Message - 
From: "Glenn W. Paschal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 9:44 AM
Subject: [UV] Fully Qualified Logon Names - EMERGANCY - HELP



There is a setting in UniVerse somewhere that tells it whether or not to use
DOMAIN/username or just username.


IIRC there is a registery setting in Windows for this. Have a look at the
readme file for the version you have it's mentioned there.

It is HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE > Software > Informix > UniVerse > CurrentVersion

Then you will probably need to created a new DWORD value with the name
UseShortUserNames.

But it does mean you can no longer use the mesage command to all users in
the local domain because that name is no longer there.

Regards,

T.


-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

UNCLASSIFIED RE: [UV] Fully Qualified Logon Names - EMERGENCY - HELP

[HENDERSON MICHAEL MR]

UV.LOGINS file?

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Glenn W. Paschal
> Sent: Friday, 20 February 2004 11:44 a.m.
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [UV] Fully Qualified Logon Names - EMERGANCY - HELP
> Importance: High
> 
> 
> Ok, this is a very simple question, and I know I ought to 
> know the answer, but it's been too long since I've done one... 
>  
> There is a setting in UniVerse somewhere that tells it 
> whether or not to use DOMAIN/username or just username.
>  
> I want username.  After my upgrade, I have DOMAIN/username.  
> How do I fix it?
>  
> You expedient assistance is appreciated.
>  
> Glenn W. Paschal
> PasTech LLC
> Computer Consulting
> ph. (931) 526-9631
> fx. (931) 526-9678
> email.   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> web.   www.pastech.net

The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended
for the addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not
necessarily the official views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence Force.
If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or 
distribute this message or the information in it.

If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone
the sender immediately.
-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

[UV] Fully Qualified Logon Names - EMERGANCY - HELP

[Glenn W. Paschal]

Ok, this is a very simple question, and I know I ought to know the answer,
but it's been too long since I've done one... 
 
There is a setting in UniVerse somewhere that tells it whether or not to use
DOMAIN/username or just username.
 
I want username.  After my upgrade, I have DOMAIN/username.  How do I fix
it?
 
You expedient assistance is appreciated.
 
Glenn W. Paschal
PasTech LLC
Computer Consulting
ph. (931) 526-9631
fx. (931) 526-9678
email.   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web.   www.pastech.net
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

RE: UniData 6.0.b Clients - now on PE download site

[Marc Harbeson]

How about getting the PE version of UD 6 replaced with a current build
also.

:-D



>I had the current clients posted on the PE site to replace the original
6.0
>clients.


--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

[UV] paragraph labels

[Barry Brevik]

On UV versions 9.4.1.1d through 9.6.1.3 as far as I know...

We have a great many paragraphs (third party app) that contains a line like
this:

IF  THEN GO OUT

...however, there is no OUT: label in the paragraph. Somehow, this works. Is
"OUT" some kinda built-in label?

I'd like to know because I don't want to learn any bad habits .
-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

UniData 6.0.b Clients - now on PE download site

[Wally Terhune]

I had the current clients posted on the PE site to replace the original 6.0
clients.
Haven't made the download any faster, though   :-(
Good luck!

Wally Terhune
Manager - U2 Advanced Technical Support
IBM Data Management Solutions
Tel: 303.294.4866 Fax: 303.294.4832
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.ibm.com/software/data/u2/support - Open, Query, Update, Search -
Online!
-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

[Fwd: Re: UNCLASSIFIED [UV] System Error Message 100102]

[Clifton Oliver]

I am posting this for LeRoy. The new list server doesn't seem to like 
Lotus Notes yet. 

--

Regards,

Clif

 Original Message 
Subject:Re: UNCLASSIFIED [UV] System Error Message 100102
Date:   Thu, 19 Feb 2004 12:57:56 -0700
From:   Leroy Dreyfuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: U2 Users Discussion List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


The message comes from our query engine and was introduced with XML. It
is harmless in that the query was successful. The fix is in the our
latest releases.
Regards,

LeRoy F. Dreyfuss
Advanced Technical Services - UniVerse
IBM U2 Data Management Solutions
Tel: 303-672-1254 Fax: 303-294-4832
Mobile: 720-341-4317
External email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2/support
www.ibm.com/software/data/u2/support - Open, Query, Update, Search - Online!
HENDERSON MICHAEL MR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*HENDERSON MICHAEL MR
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>*
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
02/19/2004 12:49 PM
Please respond to
U2 Users Discussion List
	

To

"'U2 Users Discussion List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc

Subject

UNCLASSIFIED [UV] System Error Message 100102
	

Folks,

Our system administrators have recently seen a few examples of System Error
Message 100102 "get_expbuf: illegal level 0, current level 0." appearing in
the UV ERRLOG.
Can anyone tell me what this means, and what (if anything) we can do about
it?
UV 10.0.15 on Windows 2003 Server

Thanks

Mike Henderson
---
Senior Analyst / Programmer, Corporate Applications
Communications & Information Systems Branch
New Zealand Defence Force
DDI: +64 4 2371 828
Fax: +64 4 2371 807
Mob: +64 21 300 654




The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended
for the addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not
necessarily the official views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence Force.
If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or
distribute this message or the information in it.
If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone
the sender immediately.
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

RE: UNCLASSIFIED [UV] System Error Message 100102

[HENDERSON MICHAEL MR]

Gwen

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gwen Buck
> Sent: Friday, 20 February 2004 9:26 a.m.
> To: U2 Users Discussion List
> Subject: RE: UNCLASSIFIED [UV] System Error Message 100102



> 
> Mike,
> 
> I can't tell you what your error means but I just noticed your version.
> We had some problems implementing this version of UniVerse on Win2000
> server.  We were told we should not go 'live' with it and we moved up to
> 10.0.17.  There was some list discussion on this release a while back
> and someone said UV 10.0.15 was something that should have never made it
> out to the field. 

By the time the problems with 10.0.15 were made public, we had had it on our
development system for five or six weeks, and in production for a fortnight.
Since the production upgrade from UV9.6 had also been a platform change from
HP-UX to Win2K3, we couldn't go back to anything, and 10.0.17 was then not
yet available.  We were stuck on 10.0.15 :-(
Fortunately we have not had any of the problems some others have experienced
with this release, but we are eagerly looking forward to 10.1!

 
> Maybe someone out there will know whether the version
> is connected to your error message or whether a UV upgrade would fix the
> problem.
> 
> Gwen Buck
> -- 
> u2-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
> 

The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended
for the addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not
necessarily the official views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence Force.
If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or 
distribute this message or the information in it.

If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone
the sender immediately.
-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

RE: UNCLASSIFIED [UV] System Error Message 100102

[Gwen Buck]

System Error Message 100102 "get_expbuf: illegal level 0, current level
0." appearing in the UV ERRLOG.

UV 10.0.15 on Windows 2003 Server



Mike,

I can't tell you what your error means but I just noticed your version.
We had some problems implementing this version of UniVerse on Win2000
server.  We were told we should not go 'live' with it and we moved up to
10.0.17.  There was some list discussion on this release a while back
and someone said UV 10.0.15 was something that should have never made it
out to the field.  Maybe someone out there will know whether the version
is connected to your error message or whether a UV upgrade would fix the
problem.

Gwen Buck
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

RE: Who's using 10.1.0 on WS2K3?:

[Mike Dallaire]

Ron,
We currently have 4 customers running on Win 2k3 with UniVerse 10.0.17 and
with 10.1.  We have had them running for about 3 to 4 months now and have
not had any issues related specifically to the OS or new UV.  That is to
say, the few problems we have seen were known issues on earlier releases.
Mike Dallaire
Mortgage Builder Software Inc.
(248) 208-3223 ext. 103
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Ron Moore
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 1:04 PM
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: Who's using 10.1.0 on WS2K3?:


We are currently running uv 9.6.2.1E on DG/UX (quickly disappearing) and
are considering a simultaneous uv upgrade and shift to Windows OS.
IBM's Product availability Matrix shows uv ver. 10.1.0 available on
WS2K3 released on 12/17/2003.  Is anyone currently running at this
version?  Any concerns or issues?

Perhaps there a matrix showing U2 version/OS as a percentage of the U2
user base?

TIA,
Ron Moore
Sr. Database Administrator
Comtech PST Corp.
Melville, NY
www.comtechpst.com



--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

UNCLASSIFIED RE: UniVerse and Backup Exec

[HENDERSON MICHAEL MR]

Thanks for this, Tom

Do you know if the 48MB limit has been increased in Windows 2003 Server?

What would you think is the practical ceiling on the number of Telnet users
caused by this 48MB limit - assume a UV server not used for anything else? 


Thanks


Mike

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Tom Firl
> Sent: Friday, 20 February 2004 6:34 a.m.
> To: U2 Users Discussion List
> Subject: RE: UniVerse and Backup Exec
> 

[snip]

> Note, on a system-wide basis there is a finite limit of 48MB 
> of shared heap space.  
> 

[snip]
 
> Note, the finite heap space limit of 48MB is a BIG reason why 
> it is difficult to achieve high levels of user scalability 
> for "terminal server-like" applications (such as some of the 
> green screen software that runs on Universe and jBASE) on 
> Windows servers.
> 
> Tom Firl
> Columbia Ultimate

The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended
for the addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not
necessarily the official views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence Force.
If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or 
distribute this message or the information in it.

If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone
the sender immediately.
-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

UNCLASSIFIED [UV] System Error Message 100102

[HENDERSON MICHAEL MR]

Folks,

Our system administrators have recently seen a few examples of System Error
Message 100102 "get_expbuf: illegal level 0, current level 0." appearing in
the UV ERRLOG.

Can anyone tell me what this means, and what (if anything) we can do about
it?

UV 10.0.15 on Windows 2003 Server


Thanks


Mike Henderson
---
Senior Analyst / Programmer, Corporate Applications
Communications & Information Systems Branch
New Zealand Defence Force
DDI: +64 4 2371 828
Fax: +64 4 2371 807 
Mob: +64 21 300 654





The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended
for the addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not
necessarily the official views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence Force.
If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or 
distribute this message or the information in it.

If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone
the sender immediately.
-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

New U2 Customers

[Ron White]

Finally!  Some good news from
http://www.afsi.com/news/press_view.asp?contentid=204.

Ron White


-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Re: [OT] Looking for U2 owners in northern suburbs PA, USA

[Debra Gonski]

Rich,

We will have an opening for a programmer/analyst in the near future at Loyola College. 
 Check out our web page.  www.loyola.edu

HTH
Debra

Debra J. Gonski
D.B.A., Systems Development
Technology Services
Loyola College in Maryland
410-617-2931
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/19/04 03:40AM >>>
** Reply to message from "Rich Sias" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 18 Feb 2004
11:13:28 -0500

> Well, I got to start my searching for gainful employment. I have used 2.5 weeks
> just working on refining the resume, it is near done soon and I need to gather
> potential sites near where I live first.
> 
> Contact me directly with places (company names) and other details if known and
> date of last contact if old knowledge.  If you had a contact name and or phone
> number that would be even nicer.  Can be former employers, current ones,
> customers, buyers or other contacts that you are aware they own a U2 system and
> just might need a DBA or such.

Hmmm, I left out any clue on city

Philadelphia, PA USA   (Northern Suburbs)
Northern Suburbs are nearby Doylestown for me.

Although looks more like choice of change careers or move elsewhere.

For those who already knew me, thanks for the replies.

Rich Sias
-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Who's using 10.1.0 on WS2K3?:

[Ron Moore]

We are currently running uv 9.6.2.1E on DG/UX (quickly disappearing) and
are considering a simultaneous uv upgrade and shift to Windows OS.
IBM's Product availability Matrix shows uv ver. 10.1.0 available on
WS2K3 released on 12/17/2003.  Is anyone currently running at this
version?  Any concerns or issues?

Perhaps there a matrix showing U2 version/OS as a percentage of the U2
user base?

TIA,
Ron Moore
Sr. Database Administrator
Comtech PST Corp.
Melville, NY
www.comtechpst.com



-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

RE: UniVerse and Backup Exec

[Tom Firl]

> Dennis also mentioned a registry tweak.  I'm guessing that 
> possibly this is contained in the tech tip that Steve posted. 

I didn't catch the nature of the errors, but the registry tweak may have to do with 
the Windows SharedSection parameter that relates to telnet service.  

Users that connect via telnet attach to a non-interactive desktop in Windows.  Each 
user requires some desktop heap -- a finite resource.  You can set the amount of 
desktop heap allocated to non-interactive desktop by tweaking the SharedSection 
parameter for Windows.  

The Windows SharedSection parameter is found in the registry at 
"HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE/System/CurentControlSet/Control/SessionManager/SubSystem/Windows" 

The DWORD value for the Windows key will look something like this: 
"%SystemRoot%\system32\csrss.exe ObjectDirectory= \Windows SharedSection=1024,3072,512 
Windows=On SubSystemType=Windows 
ServerDll=basesrv,1ServerDll=winsrv:UserServerDllInitializat 
ion,3ServerDll=winsrv:ConServerDllInitialization,2 
ProfileControl=OffMaxRequestThreads=16" 

The SharedSection ,, string is the parameter of interest.  The values of 
, , and  are defined as follows:

 is the size of the system heap in kbytes 

 - is the size of the interactive desktop heap in kbytes -- that is, each desktop 
that is created is allocated an amount of  kbytes of heap space.

 - is the size of the non-interactive desktop heap in kbytes -- again, each 
non-interactive desktop that is created is allocated an amount of  kbytes of heap 
space.

The non-interactive heap setting --  -- is the one that affect telnet. The default 
setting of  when the OS is installed is blank.  The default value when  is 
blank is 3072.

Note, on a system-wide basis there is a finite limit of 48MB of shared heap space.  

When B/E is installed, the value of  is set to 512.  This reduces the size of the 
heap for each non-interactive desktop that is created -- including the non-interactive 
desktop used by the UV Telnet service.  The smaller the heap space of the 
non-interactive desktop for the UV telnet service, the fewer the number of connections 
that the service will support.

I would expect that if limited heap space is causing the errors in the registry, you 
would also be having some problems getting users connected, or having users abnormally 
disconnected.

If this is the case, you might increase the size of the heap space allocated to 
non-interactive desktops () to a value of 1024.  You will need to reboot the 
system after making the change in order for them to be effective.

Note, because there is a finite limit of system-wide heap space, increasing the values 
of  and  can cause other problems (such are some services not starting).  How 
much system-wide heap space that is used is determined by the applications that create 
desktops and the size of those desktop.  Typically, non-interactive desktops are 
created by services and an interactive desktop created for the console user.

Note, the finite heap space limit of 48MB is a BIG reason why it is difficult to 
achieve high levels of user scalability for "terminal server-like" applications (such 
as some of the green screen software that runs on Universe and jBASE) on Windows 
servers.

Tom Firl
Columbia Ultimate


--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

RE: version control software

[Don Verhagen]

[unsolicited testimonial]

We've been using PRC (www.sjplus.com) for about 4 years, couldn't be happier with it.

Software: 
Unidata 5.x on HP-UX
SB Server 5.x

Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions, etc.





Donald Verhagen   1690 S Congress Avenue, Suite 210
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Delray Beach, FL 33445  USA
Tandem Staffing Solutions, Inc.  Voice Phone: 561.454.3592
Senior Programmer  Fax Phone: 561.454.3640
---

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9:34:30 AM 02/19/2004 >>>
Try Susan Joslyn's PRC [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

-Original Message-
> On Behalf Of Jeff Steinmetz
> Sent: Thursday, 19 February 2004 3:20 p.m.
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Subject: version control software
>
>
> I am looking for a version control application for U2
> software development. Ideally it would have a
> check-out/check-in function, ability to track changes,
> migration dates, etc
>
> Does anyone have any suggestions?
>
>


-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Re: UniData 6.0.9

[Lembit Pirn]

Yes, we have used it heavily (in production) about month or so without any
known problems.

Lembit Pirn
7+7 Software
Tondi 1
Tallinn 11313
Estonia
+372 65 66 232
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

- Original Message - 
From: "Morgan, Katie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 6:49 PM
Subject: UniData 6.0.9


> We currently have an option of upgrading to either UniData 6.0.3 or
> 6.0.9.  Is there anybody currently on 6.0.9 under Solaris 9 that could
> offer a "report card" on it?
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Katie
>
>
> M. Katie Morgan
> Manager of Enterprise Data Systems
> Pacific University
> 2043 College Way
> Forest Grove OR 97116
>
> Voice: (503) 352-3012
> Fax:  (503) 352-3162
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -- 
> u2-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Universe Object for Universe 9.3

[Graham Hansen]

Anyone out there got Universe Objects (UVOaif.ocx etc) that is
compatible with version of 9.3 of Universe?  We have a client with this
version who has "mislaid" their disks and IBM cannot supply
replacements.

Graham Hansen
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

UniData 6.0.9

[Morgan, Katie]

We currently have an option of upgrading to either UniData 6.0.3 or
6.0.9.  Is there anybody currently on 6.0.9 under Solaris 9 that could
offer a "report card" on it?


Thanks!


Katie


M. Katie Morgan
Manager of Enterprise Data Systems
Pacific University
2043 College Way
Forest Grove OR 97116

Voice: (503) 352-3012
Fax:  (503) 352-3162

[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

SV: [UV] Very slow SQL query

[Björn Eklund]

Cesar,
You need to build the index also, try BUILD.INDEX  ALL
In Unidata that is.

Björn Eklund



-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Cesar Riba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skickat: den 19 februari 2004 17:24
Till: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Ämne: RE: [UV] Very slow SQL query




-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
nombre de Brian Leach
Enviado el: jueves, 19 de febrero de 2004 16:22
Para: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Asunto: RE: [UV] Very slow SQL query


César,

I think we will need more information to help you.

1. are you running the SQL query at TCL or through ODBC or OleDB?

  César: I running the SQL query at TCL



2. Can you give the command you are running please.

   Cesar: SELECT PEDIDO,REFART,DESART,CANTIDAD,CANTMODALB FROM GCMLIAL WHERE
EMPALBA = '1*05236' ORDER BY EMP, ALBA, NUMLIN;
   Cesar: SELECT PEDIDO, SUREF FROM GCMLIAL WHERE EMPALBA = '1*05236' GROUP
BY PEDIDO, SUREF;



3. Are there any indexes on the files? (LIST.INDEX filename ALL)

   Cesar: There aren't indexes on the files, I create index but the result
is the same.




Regards,

Brian Leach


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Cesar Riba
Sent: 19 February 2004 15:04
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [UV] Very slow SQL query

Hello,


I have two files one has 300.000 records and another has 200.000
records, I wante to make SQL Query whit the two files and this takes bettewn
30 seconds and 1 minute to return the result.

However, I have a program with BASIC to obtime the same result and it
takes less than one second, I have heard that other DB Systems like SQL
Server, Oracle, etc... are very fast with the SQL Query.

Is this posible or do have I made a mistake?


Thanks


César

--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


This email was checked by MessageLabs SkyScan before entering Microgen.



This email was checked on leaving Microgen for viruses, similar
malicious code and inappropriate content by MessageLabs SkyScan.

DISCLAIMER

This email and any attachments are confidential and may also be
privileged.

If you are not the named recipient, please notify the sender
immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other
person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information.

In the event of any technical difficulty with this email, please
contact the sender or [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Microgen Information Management Solutions
http://www.microgen.co.uk
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Re: [ADMIN] The aforementioned and promised NAG about OVERQUOTING

[Moderator]

This was meant to be private, not via the list. I am not picking on 
Jerry alone, as many who are receiving these reminders will attest.

In-line vs top posting, whatever. Neither is any excuse for the laziness 
of not trimming.

--

Regards,

Clif

Moderator wrote:

QUOTING NAG

Please refrain from quoting all of a message when replying to one or 
more points in it.
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

RE: UniVerse and Backup Exec

[Marc Harbeson]

This issue also exists in UD...

On windows 2000, around 50 UD sessions will make things start to shake
violently.

I personally think IBM/Informix should have their butts kicked for not
CLEARLY documenting this issue, or fixing it.

My solution was to install ArcServe! LOL

-m

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Dennis Bartlett
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 9:29 AM
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: RE: UniVerse and Backup Exec

Hi Gwen

We're running UniVerse 10.0.4 (a known baddie as it is) and
Backup Exec,
tho' which I don't know off hand. We also get plenty app
errors

We've had 47 system crashes sinces Aug '03, which IBM have
first blamed
on Backup Exec, then told us "that 10.1 would fix it"
thereby admitting
the problem lay in UV.

When pressed to supply us 10.1 to fix the problem, the
answer was that
we'd have to wait for 10.1.1 as that was specific for "our
platform"

We originally thought the problem might lie in the way the
system (incl
W2K) had been loaded, and so re-installed W2K Server, then
Backup Exec,
then used that to restore the system. Didn't work.

We're still running B/E on the UV server, the system crashed
twice
yesterday, and once today, and management still doesn't see
the need to
change servers / UV's just yet.

One thing tho' we did do when tweaking the reloaded
UniVerse - we
modified a registry key that some bright spark had
discovered helped B/E
and UV to co-exist. What that tweak is I don't remember -
but I know
that the guy who does is also on this list - Kurt, please
supply!

Something else that IBM said might fix the problem was if we
installed
B/E on a different server and backed up over the network...


dennis

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of
At 09:18 AM 2/17/04 -0500, you wrote:
>I am running:
>UniVerse 10.0.17
>Windows 2000 SP 4
>Veritas Backup Exec:  Media Server & Admin. Console: Ver
9.00 Rev 4454



>Thanks in advance for any help you can offer!
>Gwen Buck
>Gaska Tape Inc.
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>--
>u2-users mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

--
Steven M Wagner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cary, North Carolina, United States of America

--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Re: [ADMIN] The aforementioned and promised NAG about OVERQUOTING

[Moderator]

QUOTING NAG

Please refrain from quoting all of a message when replying to one or 
more points in it.

The general guideline of netiquette when replying to messages is that 
you should quote only about four lines of the *most recent* post for 
each point to which you are responding. If you are replying to several 
points, do not top-post. Quote four or five lines, add your point, quote 
some more, add your point, etc.

And quoting an entire thread is always inappropriate in a discussion 
list or newsgroup.

Your assistance is reducing the data smog is appreciated.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Jerry Banker wrote:

If it's not at the top it generally goes in the deleted folder. I haven't
got time to go searching through the text for an answer.
- Original Message - 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 5:38 AM
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] The aforementioned and promised NAG about OVERQUOTING

Well, Ray has spoken, so I guess that makes it gospel. Top posting is
"wrong-posting", and only newbies who don't know any better do it. Speak for
yourself, Ray - I, and many others, would rather not have to scroll down in
each post
to see the new material. I want to see it at the top, and scroll down if I
need to refresh my memory as to the context. I am not a newby - I've been in
the
computer business for 26 years, and on the internet about as long as there
was
one (BBSs before that - top posting was quite common then, too).
I do agree that the poster should trim out non-relevant material from prior
posts, though.
Regards,
Charlie Noah
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

[snip]
  Without interposting, you have no idea where the reply
fits into the thread.  If you are a reader that typically reads
through an entire thread, when it's essentially dead, and don't mind
the occasional reply that's out of place because somebody has their
clock out of sync, or the time zone set incorrectly, then that's fine
for you.  But top-posting still makes things more difficult for just
about everybody else.
The byte flow problem, is the one that directly affects Cliff and the
digests.  Unfortunately, 99.% of Top-Posters neglect to trim the
quoted message to the relevant material.  That wastes huge amounts of
bandwidth.
[snip]
There really are no valid reasons to top-post, but there are plenty
of valid reasons to inter-post and trim the quoted material.  That's
why it's been a flameable action on Usenet for over twenty years.
Top-posting has only become more common in recent years because OE
and a few other email/newsreader hybrids (that really don't do either
well) make it tough to reply correctly and newbies are showing up
everyday, not just in the first couple of weeks in September.
Insisting on top-posting and not trimming the quoted material,
especially when there's replies that have already been right-posted
(aka inter-posted), I hate to say it, is just plain rude and self
serving.  Please take a moment and read the material listed in the
two links previously provided.  If you missed them, here they are
again:

http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting
Ray
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

RE: UniVerse and Backup Exec

[Gwen Buck]

 
First of all, thanks to all who have replied to my post!  I'm attempting
to combine all replies in this one e-mail.

A couple people mentioned alternate backup methods.  One was to do a
uvbackup and run Backup Exec and the other was to backup remotely.
Since IBM does not want Backup Exec to exist on my server, the remote
backup might be a solution.  IBM suggested this but that presents some
bridges that I don't want to cross if I don't have to.

After reading Dennis' post I'm counting my blessing that my server is
not crashing.  I am losing some RF users, however, and I have been
wondering if that problem was somehow related.  For now, I have put a
logout program in place to resolve the dead user the next time the RF
user logs on.  We did have a crash problem when on NT 4.0. Vmark (I
think...or maybe Ardent) had us remove ArcServe and use NTBackup and
that resolved the problem.  

Dennis also mentioned a registry tweak.  I'm guessing that possibly this
is contained in the tech tip that Steve posted.  My tech support is
through Epicor so I will press them a little more on whether/how this
tip applies to Win2K.

Mark mentioned that we should use an OFM (open file manager) with Backup
Exec.  We use the "Advanced Open File Option" which is a companion
product for Backup Exec.

Wol (Anthony?) asked if I'm backing up the UV account.  I am not.  I'm
just backing up user accounts and some additional shared databases that
exist on the same drive.  The whole backup takes less than 45 minutes as
compared to about 6 hours on my old server.  

I appreciate all the help everyone has offered.  I now have some new
avenues to explore!

Thank you!
Gwen Buck
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

RE: [UV] Very slow SQL query

[Cesar Riba]

-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
nombre de Brian Leach
Enviado el: jueves, 19 de febrero de 2004 16:22
Para: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Asunto: RE: [UV] Very slow SQL query


César,

I think we will need more information to help you.

1. are you running the SQL query at TCL or through ODBC or OleDB?

  César: I running the SQL query at TCL



2. Can you give the command you are running please.

   Cesar: SELECT PEDIDO,REFART,DESART,CANTIDAD,CANTMODALB FROM GCMLIAL WHERE
EMPALBA = '1*05236' ORDER BY EMP, ALBA, NUMLIN;
   Cesar: SELECT PEDIDO, SUREF FROM GCMLIAL WHERE EMPALBA = '1*05236' GROUP
BY PEDIDO, SUREF;



3. Are there any indexes on the files? (LIST.INDEX filename ALL)

   Cesar: There aren't indexes on the files, I create index but the result
is the same.




Regards,

Brian Leach


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Cesar Riba
Sent: 19 February 2004 15:04
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [UV] Very slow SQL query

Hello,


I have two files one has 300.000 records and another has 200.000
records, I wante to make SQL Query whit the two files and this takes bettewn
30 seconds and 1 minute to return the result.

However, I have a program with BASIC to obtime the same result and it
takes less than one second, I have heard that other DB Systems like SQL
Server, Oracle, etc... are very fast with the SQL Query.

Is this posible or do have I made a mistake?


Thanks


César

--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


This email was checked by MessageLabs SkyScan before entering Microgen.



This email was checked on leaving Microgen for viruses, similar
malicious code and inappropriate content by MessageLabs SkyScan.

DISCLAIMER

This email and any attachments are confidential and may also be
privileged.

If you are not the named recipient, please notify the sender
immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other
person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information.

In the event of any technical difficulty with this email, please
contact the sender or [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Microgen Information Management Solutions
http://www.microgen.co.uk
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

RE: Face-to-Face U2 gathering

[Pritchard, Hugh (CSED)]

Dawn, you're coming to D.C.?  Email me privately, and I'll do my best to get
you that desired beverage.

   Hugh
___
   Hugh Pritchard (Tier), 202-546-3066, cell 301-467-1712
   D.C. Ofc of Corporation Counsel, Child Support Enforcement Division
   650 Pennsylvania Ave SE, Suite 250, Washington, DC 20003
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Behalf Of Dawn M. Wolthuis
| Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 10:23 PM
| To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
| Subject: RE: Face-to-Face U2 gathering
| 
| Rats -- Spectrum coincides with the Datatel User Group 
| conference this year.
| So, if you happen to be going to DUG in DC rather than Spectrum in LV,
| please let me know you are a u2-users member if you see me 
| working in the
| Entrinsik (Informer) booth or find me sitting next to the 
| lobby in need of a
| beverage (just kiddin').
| 
| By the way, there is a lot in the works with the 
| International U2UG, and we
| hope to communicate to the members soon -- we have been vewy 
| qwiet of late,
| but have been meeting bi-weekly by phone, including IBM.  
| Stay tuned.  
| --dawn
| 
| Dawn M. Wolthuis
| Tincat Group, Inc.
| www.tincat-group.com
-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

RE: WinteGrate

[Barry Rogen]

Here is a reprint of that for you Anthony...

On Behalf Of Hennessey, Mark F.
Sent: 19 February 2004 15:25
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: WinteGrate




Use the wIntegrate "execute command on pc" function to display the file.
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.


We do something similar using rsh (wrshdnt runs on each pc)...  I think
the pc command you'd want (assumine internet explorer in a default
instal):
/progra~1/intern~1/iexplore {url to where the jpg is located} 

We pass a url that leads to a small *nix machine running apache that
mounts a directory from our production machine.  Just like that, our old
character based application "reaches out", opens IE and sends the user
to the exact pdf they want...

Barry Rogen
Senior Programmer
PNY  Technologies
(973) 515 - 9700  ext 5327
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
The quality of a person's life is in direct
proportion to their commitment to excellence
regardless of their chosen field of endeavor
   vince lombardi
_

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Anthony Youngman
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 11:04 AM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: WinteGrate

Good to know. So if I need to, I can do that too :-)

I just wonder who sent the original posting recommending IE (and when)?
I'm convinced our anti-spam is dropping some mail, as I regularly see
replies to emails I've never seen ... (coupled with the tendency now on
this list to oversnip - deleting attributions and all :-)

Cheers,
Wol 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Barry Rogen
Sent: 19 February 2004 15:48
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: WinteGrate


   I did it your way Anthony. It did in fact fire up the default
viewer, whether I was testing with jpg, bmp or tif. Seems to allow
just what I wanted.

Barry Rogen
Senior Programmer
PNY  Technologies
(973) 515 - 9700  ext 5327
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
The quality of a person's life is in direct
proportion to their commitment to excellence
regardless of their chosen field of endeavor
   vince lombardi
_

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Anthony Youngman
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 10:45 AM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: WinteGrate

But what if IE is not the default viewer for jpegs or pdfs? (admittedly
this is a home setup, but I've barred IE from accessing the network!).

As I said, I think invoking the document will fire up the default
viewer, but although I know it can be done I'm not certain whether that
is the way or not.

Cheers,
Wol 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Hennessey, Mark F.
Sent: 19 February 2004 15:25
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: WinteGrate




Use the wIntegrate "execute command on pc" function to display the file.
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.


We do something similar using rsh (wrshdnt runs on each pc)...  I think
the pc command you'd want (assumine internet explorer in a default
instal):
/progra~1/intern~1/iexplore {url to where the jpg is located} 

We pass a url that leads to a small *nix machine running apache that
mounts a directory from our production machine.  Just like that, our old
character based application "reaches out", opens IE and sends the user
to the exact pdf they want...
-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users





***

This transmission is intended for the named recipient only. It may
contain private and confidential information. If this has come to you in
error you must not act on anything disclosed in it, nor must you copy
it, modify it, disseminate it in any way, or show it to anyone. Please
e-mail the sender to inform us of the transmission error or telephone
ECA International immediately and delete the e-mail from your
information system.

Telephone numbers for ECA International offices are: Sydney +61 (0)2
9911 7799, Hong Kong + 852 2121 2388, London +44 (0)20 7351 5000 and New
York +1 212 582 2333.


***

-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

RE: WinteGrate

[Anthony Youngman]

Good to know. So if I need to, I can do that too :-)

I just wonder who sent the original posting recommending IE (and when)?
I'm convinced our anti-spam is dropping some mail, as I regularly see
replies to emails I've never seen ... (coupled with the tendency now on
this list to oversnip - deleting attributions and all :-)

Cheers,
Wol 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Barry Rogen
Sent: 19 February 2004 15:48
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: WinteGrate


   I did it your way Anthony. It did in fact fire up the default
viewer, whether I was testing with jpg, bmp or tif. Seems to allow
just what I wanted.

Barry Rogen
Senior Programmer
PNY  Technologies
(973) 515 - 9700  ext 5327
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
The quality of a person's life is in direct
proportion to their commitment to excellence
regardless of their chosen field of endeavor
   vince lombardi
_

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Anthony Youngman
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 10:45 AM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: WinteGrate

But what if IE is not the default viewer for jpegs or pdfs? (admittedly
this is a home setup, but I've barred IE from accessing the network!).

As I said, I think invoking the document will fire up the default
viewer, but although I know it can be done I'm not certain whether that
is the way or not.

Cheers,
Wol 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Hennessey, Mark F.
Sent: 19 February 2004 15:25
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: WinteGrate




Use the wIntegrate "execute command on pc" function to display the file.
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.


We do something similar using rsh (wrshdnt runs on each pc)...  I think
the pc command you'd want (assumine internet explorer in a default
instal):
/progra~1/intern~1/iexplore {url to where the jpg is located} 

We pass a url that leads to a small *nix machine running apache that
mounts a directory from our production machine.  Just like that, our old
character based application "reaches out", opens IE and sends the user
to the exact pdf they want...
-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users





***

This transmission is intended for the named recipient only. It may
contain private and confidential information. If this has come to you in
error you must not act on anything disclosed in it, nor must you copy
it, modify it, disseminate it in any way, or show it to anyone. Please
e-mail the sender to inform us of the transmission error or telephone
ECA International immediately and delete the e-mail from your
information system.

Telephone numbers for ECA International offices are: Sydney +61 (0)2
9911 7799, Hong Kong + 852 2121 2388, London +44 (0)20 7351 5000 and New
York +1 212 582 2333.


***

-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

RE: WinteGrate

[Barry Rogen]

   I did it your way Anthony. It did in fact fire up the default
viewer, whether I was testing with jpg, bmp or tif. Seems to allow
just what I wanted.

Barry Rogen
Senior Programmer
PNY  Technologies
(973) 515 - 9700  ext 5327
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
The quality of a person's life is in direct
proportion to their commitment to excellence
regardless of their chosen field of endeavor
   vince lombardi
_

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Anthony Youngman
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 10:45 AM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: WinteGrate

But what if IE is not the default viewer for jpegs or pdfs? (admittedly
this is a home setup, but I've barred IE from accessing the network!).

As I said, I think invoking the document will fire up the default
viewer, but although I know it can be done I'm not certain whether that
is the way or not.

Cheers,
Wol 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Hennessey, Mark F.
Sent: 19 February 2004 15:25
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: WinteGrate




Use the wIntegrate "execute command on pc" function to display the file.
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.


We do something similar using rsh (wrshdnt runs on each pc)...  I think
the pc command you'd want (assumine internet explorer in a default
instal):
/progra~1/intern~1/iexplore {url to where the jpg is located} 

We pass a url that leads to a small *nix machine running apache that
mounts a directory from our production machine.  Just like that, our old
character based application "reaches out", opens IE and sends the user
to the exact pdf they want...
-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users





***

This transmission is intended for the named recipient only. It may
contain private and confidential information. If this has come to you in
error you must not act on anything disclosed in it, nor must you copy
it, modify it, disseminate it in any way, or show it to anyone. Please
e-mail the sender to inform us of the transmission error or telephone
ECA International immediately and delete the e-mail from your
information system.

Telephone numbers for ECA International offices are: Sydney +61 (0)2
9911 7799, Hong Kong + 852 2121 2388, London +44 (0)20 7351 5000 and New
York +1 212 582 2333.


***

-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

RE: WinteGrate

[Anthony Youngman]

But what if IE is not the default viewer for jpegs or pdfs? (admittedly
this is a home setup, but I've barred IE from accessing the network!).

As I said, I think invoking the document will fire up the default
viewer, but although I know it can be done I'm not certain whether that
is the way or not.

Cheers,
Wol 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Hennessey, Mark F.
Sent: 19 February 2004 15:25
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: WinteGrate




Use the wIntegrate "execute command on pc" function to display the file.
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.


We do something similar using rsh (wrshdnt runs on each pc)...  I think
the pc command you'd want (assumine internet explorer in a default
instal):
/progra~1/intern~1/iexplore {url to where the jpg is located} 

We pass a url that leads to a small *nix machine running apache that
mounts a directory from our production machine.  Just like that, our old
character based application "reaches out", opens IE and sends the user
to the exact pdf they want...
-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users




***

This transmission is intended for the named recipient only. It may contain private and 
confidential information. If this has come to you in error you must not act on 
anything disclosed in it, nor must you copy it, modify it, disseminate it in any way, 
or show it to anyone. Please e-mail the sender to inform us of the transmission error 
or telephone ECA International immediately and delete the e-mail from your information 
system.

Telephone numbers for ECA International offices are: Sydney +61 (0)2 9911 7799, Hong 
Kong + 852 2121 2388, London +44 (0)20 7351 5000 and New York +1 212 582 2333.

***

--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

RE: WinteGrate

[Hennessey, Mark F.]

Use the wIntegrate "execute command on pc" function to display the file.
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.


We do something similar using rsh (wrshdnt runs on each pc)...  I think the pc command 
you'd want (assumine internet explorer in a default instal):
/progra~1/intern~1/iexplore {url to where the jpg is located} 

We pass a url that leads to a small *nix machine running apache that mounts a 
directory from our production machine.  Just like that, our old character based 
application "reaches out", opens IE and sends the user to the exact pdf they want...
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

RE: [UV] Very slow SQL query

[Brian Leach]

César,

I think we will need more information to help you.

1. are you running the SQL query at TCL or through ODBC or OleDB?

2. Can you give the command you are running please.

3. Are there any indexes on the files? (LIST.INDEX filename ALL)

Regards,

Brian Leach
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Cesar Riba
Sent: 19 February 2004 15:04
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [UV] Very slow SQL query

Hello,


I have two files one has 300.000 records and another has 200.000
records, I wante to make SQL Query whit the two files and this takes bettewn
30 seconds and 1 minute to return the result.

However, I have a program with BASIC to obtime the same result and it
takes less than one second, I have heard that other DB Systems like SQL
Server, Oracle, etc... are very fast with the SQL Query.

Is this posible or do have I made a mistake?


Thanks


César

--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


This email was checked by MessageLabs SkyScan before entering Microgen.



This email was checked on leaving Microgen for viruses, similar
malicious code and inappropriate content by MessageLabs SkyScan.

DISCLAIMER

This email and any attachments are confidential and may also be
privileged.

If you are not the named recipient, please notify the sender
immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other
person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information.

In the event of any technical difficulty with this email, please
contact the sender or [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Microgen Information Management Solutions
http://www.microgen.co.uk
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

RE: UniVerse and Backup Exec

[Anthony Youngman]

Are you backing up just a user-accounts partition, or are you backing up
the UV account itself, too?

We had an issue with backup software (I think it was BackupExec) and
backing up the UV account. If the NT client code is the same as the nix
code (ported from nix) that could be your problem ...

When our backup software built up a list of files to be copied to tape,
among other directories, it picked up the global catalog, which has
loads of files whose name begins with "*" ... OOPS !!!

This list got reglobbed ... and the asterisks were treated as wildcards
... I can't remember what happened, but I can well imagine a recursive
file expansion causing the system to OOMplode ... (Out Of Memory).

And don't say "this is NT" - there are more than enough cases of nix
software being modified "just enough" to run on NT and suffering the
same problems as running native nix. I'm not saying this definitely IS
such an instance, but it could well be ...

Cheers,
Wol

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Dennis Bartlett
Sent: 19 February 2004 14:29
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: RE: UniVerse and Backup Exec

Hi Gwen

We're running UniVerse 10.0.4 (a known baddie as it is) and
Backup Exec,
tho' which I don't know off hand. We also get plenty app
errors

We've had 47 system crashes sinces Aug '03, which IBM have
first blamed
on Backup Exec, then told us "that 10.1 would fix it"
thereby admitting
the problem lay in UV.

When pressed to supply us 10.1 to fix the problem, the
answer was that
we'd have to wait for 10.1.1 as that was specific for "our
platform"

We originally thought the problem might lie in the way the
system (incl
W2K) had been loaded, and so re-installed W2K Server, then
Backup Exec,
then used that to restore the system. Didn't work.

We're still running B/E on the UV server, the system crashed
twice
yesterday, and once today, and management still doesn't see
the need to
change servers / UV's just yet.

One thing tho' we did do when tweaking the reloaded
UniVerse - we
modified a registry key that some bright spark had
discovered helped B/E
and UV to co-exist. What that tweak is I don't remember -
but I know
that the guy who does is also on this list - Kurt, please
supply!

Something else that IBM said might fix the problem was if we
installed
B/E on a different server and backed up over the network...


dennis

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of
At 09:18 AM 2/17/04 -0500, you wrote:
>I am running:
>UniVerse 10.0.17
>Windows 2000 SP 4
>Veritas Backup Exec:  Media Server & Admin. Console: Ver
9.00 Rev 4454



>Thanks in advance for any help you can offer!
>Gwen Buck
>Gaska Tape Inc.
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>--
>u2-users mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

--
Steven M Wagner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cary, North Carolina, United States of America

--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users




***

This transmission is intended for the named recipient only. It may contain private and 
confidential information. If this has come to you in error you must not act on 
anything disclosed in it, nor must you copy it, modify it, disseminate it in any way, 
or show it to anyone. Please e-mail the sender to inform us of the transmission error 
or telephone ECA International immediately and delete the e-mail from your information 
system.

Telephone numbers for ECA International offices are: Sydney +61 (0)2 9911 7799, Hong 
Kong + 852 2121 2388, London +44 (0)20 7351 5000 and New York +1 212 582 2333.

***

--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

SV: [UV] Very slow SQL query

[Björn Eklund]

Hi, it sounds to me that you are not using any indexes.
In UD there is CREATE.INDEX and BUILD.INDEX commands you need to run.

Björn Eklund

-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Cesar Riba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skickat: den 19 februari 2004 16:04
Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ämne: [UV] Very slow SQL query


Hello,


I have two files one has 300.000 records and another has 200.000
records, I wante to make SQL Query whit the two files and this takes bettewn
30 seconds and 1 minute to return the result.

However, I have a program with BASIC to obtime the same result and it
takes less than one second, I have heard that other DB Systems like SQL
Server, Oracle, etc... are very fast with the SQL Query.

Is this posible or do have I made a mistake?


Thanks


César

-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

[UV] Very slow SQL query

[Cesar Riba]

Hello,


I have two files one has 300.000 records and another has 200.000
records, I wante to make SQL Query whit the two files and this takes bettewn
30 seconds and 1 minute to return the result.

However, I have a program with BASIC to obtime the same result and it
takes less than one second, I have heard that other DB Systems like SQL
Server, Oracle, etc... are very fast with the SQL Query.

Is this posible or do have I made a mistake?


Thanks


César

-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

RE: UniVerse and Backup Exec

[Steve Moore]

Subject: UniVerse and Backup Exec

Gwen,

We found the following Techtip (#1299) from Epicor to help with Backup Exec
and Universe.

It has to do with a registry setting to allow Universe and Backup Exec
to play nice on a Windows NT server, the same setting might work for a
Windows 2000
Server.  I don't know if it will help with your problem or not.

Let me know off list how you like running Universe 10 and Windows 2000,  we
are planning
the same upgrade later this year.

HTH,

Steve Moore
Amerex Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Tech Tip #: 1299SDG Product: Ardent 
Date Added: 2/12/01 Version: 5.1 
Date Changed: 6/5/01 Module: UniData 
Option: 
Summary: Telnet sessions disconnecting/ Unable to connect   
Detail: telnet sessions start dropping off when you get close to
the 
user limit:
unidata admin on the server shows that the user session is still

ongoing and has to be killed manually
Applies to:

Windows NT servers running UniData and UniVerse.

Problem:

(1) Occurrences of the message: "User32.dll" or "Kernal32.dll 
failure" at the server. This will cause the process that
generated 
the error message to hang until an operator intervenes at the NT

console, resulting in client computers that fail to operate 
correctly with no apparent cause,
(2) The NT server slows to a crawl with no other indications of
a 
problem, or
(3) There is a problem logging in users to UniData or UniVerse
up to 
the fully licensed limit.
(4) Telnet sessions start dropping off when you get close to the

user limit:
(5) Unidata admin on the server shows that the user session is
still 
ongoing and has to be killed manually
(6) TNET.DLL failed to initialize
(7) TNET CLIENT/SITE licensing setup failed

Cause:

Services consume a small amount of memory each time they are 
started. When multiple services log on as the same account the 
system may not have enough memory to create a new desktop heap 
(pre-allocated memory) for the service being started. Microsoft
has 
confirmed this to be a problem in Windows NT version 4.0.
UniData 
and UniVerse are then unable to allocate memory for new
sessions.

Background:

This problem was brought to our attention on systems running
Seagate 
Backup Software. Seagate makes a change to a registry setting to
get 
around User32.dll errors in Windows NT (per Seagate's attached
Tech 
Note). Seagate obtained this information from Microsoft's
Knowledge 
Base Article Q142676 (also attached). Ardent tech support
believes 
that Microsoft's solution causes Kernal32.dll errors on servers 
running UniData and/or UniVerse, so they recommend a different 
solution.
The poor RDBMS performance and low number of users allowed to
login 
is due to an insufficiently sized non-interactive heap.
Increasing 
this setting has resulted in noticeably improved server
performance.

Solution:

The following solutions should be tried one at a time. After
each 
fix, check the server to see if the problem has been corrected.
It 
is strongly recommended to NOT apply every step at one time.
Make 
only the minimum changes necessary to correct the problem.
Excessive 
registry modifications may cause conflicts in other areas that
will 
be very difficult to troubleshoot.

(1). Check the virtual memory setting, located in START |
Settings | 
Control Panel | System. This opens the "System Properties"
applet. 
Select the "Performance" tab. The Virtual Memory setting is 
displayed and can be changed from here.

(2). Open the following registry key using REGEDIT or REGEDT32.

 
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE/System/CurentControlSet/Control/SessionManager/SubSystem/
Windows

The entire string will be similar to:
%SystemRoot%\system32\csrss.exe ObjectDirectory=\Windows 
SharedSection=1024,3072 Windows=On SubSystemType=Windows 
ServerDll=basesrv,1
ServerDll=winsrv:UserServerDllInitialization,3 
ServerDll=winsrv:ConServerDllInitialization,2 ProfileControl=Off

MaxRequestThreads=16

Look for the sub-string: SharedSection=XXX,YYY,ZZZ

XXX - is the size of the global heap in kilobytes.
YYY- is the size of the interactive desktop (system wide) heap
in 
kilobytes.
ZZZ- is the size of the non-interactive (hidden) desktop heap in

kilo

RE: UniVerse and Backup Exec

[Mark Eastwood]

> We're running UniVerse 10.0.4 (a known baddie as it is) and
> Backup Exec, tho' which I don't know off hand. We also get plenty app
> errors
Sorry, I missed the original post...but for what it's worth - we also run
UV10.0.4 on W2k and use Backup Exec with no problems. Only comment is you
should install an OFM (open file manager), we use St. Bernard.

Good luck, Mark.
­__


This e-mail, including any attachments, may contain information 
that is protected by law as privileged and confidential, and is 
transmitted for the sole use of the intended recipient.  If you 
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
use, dissemination, copying or retention of this e-mail or the 
information contained herein is strictly prohibited.  If you have 
received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender 
by telephone or reply e-mail, and permanently delete this e-mail 
from your computer system.  Thank you.
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

RE: STILL HANGING

[Dennis Bartlett]

Hi Schalk

Have faith! 

Perhaps an upgrade to 10.1.1 would help you, like IBM has
promised will
help us? (see my other post)

We've found Kurt Neuman at UTwo to be helpful - if he
doesn't know, he
will find out and get back to you - who is your VAR? We use
ProSol, and
find Erik de Kok friendly and knowledgeable too.

Dennis Bartlett
Hyflo
Johannesburg

-Original Message-


-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

RE: WinteGrate

[Barry Rogen]

It's a beautiful thing.  Thank you most kindly

Barry Rogen
Senior Programmer
PNY  Technologies
(973) 515 - 9700  ext 5327
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
The quality of a person's life is in direct
proportion to their commitment to excellence
regardless of their chosen field of endeavor
   vince lombardi
_

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Anthony Youngman
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 8:50 AM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: WinteGrate

Put all the jpegs in a directory on the nix box.

Share that directory to the doze boxes using SAMBA.

Use the wIntegrate "execute command on pc" function to display the file.

I'm not sure how you do it, but I think you can just try to execute the
jpeg, and Windows will automatically invoke the default viewer.

Cheers,
Wol 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Barry Rogen
Sent: 19 February 2004 13:41
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: WinteGrate


 Question:  Using WinteGrate, running UniVerse 10, Unix - Is there
a way to display a 'jpeg' file in UniVerse ?
We have trucking companies that send up 'proof of
deliveries' in jpeg format. Our user base would love
to be able to view them straight from UniVerse.

As always, very appreciative for ideas/assistance

Barry Rogen
Senior Programmer
PNY  Technologies
(973) 515 - 9700  ext 5327
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
The quality of a person's life is in direct
proportion to their commitment to excellence
regardless of their chosen field of endeavor
   vince lombardi
_


This e-mail message from PNY Technologies, Inc. is for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users





***

This transmission is intended for the named recipient only. It may
contain private and confidential information. If this has come to you in
error you must not act on anything disclosed in it, nor must you copy
it, modify it, disseminate it in any way, or show it to anyone. Please
e-mail the sender to inform us of the transmission error or telephone
ECA International immediately and delete the e-mail from your
information system.

Telephone numbers for ECA International offices are: Sydney +61 (0)2
9911 7799, Hong Kong + 852 2121 2388, London +44 (0)20 7351 5000 and New
York +1 212 582 2333.


***

-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

DOWNLOAD version 7.10 available (updated files)

[David L. Rotman]

(Somehow, a few lines of code were omitted from
the DOWNLOAD.PROCESS subroutine in the version that
I posted about 8am EST (1pm GMT) today.  Corrected files
were posted at 9:25am EST.  The missing lines would have
caused associations to not be terminated correctly in
XML in some situations. My apologies for not having
caught this earlier.)

=
I am pleased to announce that version 7.10 of DOWNLOAD is
available for free from:
ftp.cedarville.edu 

For those not familiar with DOWNLOAD, it is a "command-line"
utility which extracts data from Unidata/Universe databases
and produces output files in a variety of formats (XML, HTML,
tab-delimited, word-processing merge, etc.).  The syntax
is similar to the LIST statement.  Installation is fairly painless
using the installation paragraph provided.  A PDF reference
manual is provided.

Changes in version 7.10 include the capability to insert
text at the start of XML and HTML files (for things like
name-space references, style-sheet references, etc.).
There have also been changes in subroutine names
and cataloging options to provide a better fit in
organizations where there were naming or style
conflicts.

A summary of the changes appears below.

As usual, please let me know if you have any problems
with installation or operation.


Dave Rotman



Version 7.10:
*   Added qualifier XML.ALLOW.CHARACTERS.
*   Added DEFAULT XML.ALLOW.CHARACTERS.
*   Allow null association names in XML.
*   Added HTML.HEAD.
*   Return HTML tags in lower case for compatibility with XHTML.
*   Bug fix (allow NUM.SUBVALUES ALL for FORMAT HTML)
*   Bug fix (abort execution if @RECORD returns no entries)
*   Bug fix (honor EOR.CHAR in XML heading lines)
*   Bug fix (use "head" instead of "heading" in HTML format)   

*   Bug fix (use "th" for table headings instead of "td")
*   Renamed several external subroutines:
*  EXPAND.ITEMS  to DL.EXPAND.ITEMS
*  FLIP.8TH.BIT  to DL.FLIP.8TH.BIT
*  GET.KEYWORD.VALUE to DL.GET.KEYWORD.VALUE
*  OPEN.FILE to DL .OPEN.FILE
*  PARSE.COMMAND.LINEto DL.PARSE.COMMAND.LINE
*  PROMPT.ANSto DL.PROMPT.ANS
*  PROMPT.STACK  to DL.PROMPT.STACK
*  VIEW.FILE to DL.VIEW.FILE
*  VIEW.SEQ.FILE to DL.VIEW.SEQ.FILE
*   Added options for cataloging globally or locally during
instalation.

For folks who might be on an older release, here are
the changes that were made when release 7.00 came out
last year:
*Added EVAL functionality for output of expressions.
*Incorporated EVAL and data-field functionality into various
*   HTML and XML options.
*Added COL.HDG qualifier.
*Added XML.GROUP.NAME qualifier.
*Enabled XML.ATTRIBUTE within associated fields.
*Modified the APPEND logic to allow this function to work in
*   Universe.
*Enabled APPEND for HTML and XML output.
*Added support for NUM.VALUES when specifying the key
*   to a SECONDARY.FILE (especially useful with XML).
*Added '@RECORD' as a method for specifying output fields.
*Consolidated redundant code in DOWNLOAD.PARSE.
*Added 'DOWNLOAD HELP MAX' to show the various maximum
*   values for literals, fields, etc.
*Systematized DEBUG.LEVEL arguments (see documentation file for
*   details).
*Conformed all variables in I_DOWNLOAD_OUT_REC_COMMON to a
*   consistent naming scheme.
*Bug fix (recognize VOC entries with type LF and LD)
*Bug fix (recognize DICT records of type V)
*Bug fix (comma-quote fields with a format specification shorter
*   than the actual data length would produce unpredictable
*   results)
*Bug fix (exploded list was not being honored by secondary files)



Dave Rotman
Director of Computer Services
Cedarville University
251 N. Main Street
Cedarville, OH 45314
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
voice 937-766-7905
fax 937-766-8819
-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

RE: UNCLASSIFIED RE: version control software

[Dennis Bartlett]

Try Susan Joslyn's PRC [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
> On Behalf Of Jeff Steinmetz
> Sent: Thursday, 19 February 2004 3:20 p.m.
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: version control software
>
>
> I am looking for a version control application for U2
> software development. Ideally it would have a
> check-out/check-in function, ability to track changes,
> migration dates, etc
>
> Does anyone have any suggestions?
>
>


-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Re: [ADMIN] The aforementioned and promised NAG about OVERQUOTING

[Jerry Banker]

If it's not at the top it generally goes in the deleted folder. I haven't
got time to go searching through the text for an answer.

- Original Message - 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 5:38 AM
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] The aforementioned and promised NAG about OVERQUOTING


Well, Ray has spoken, so I guess that makes it gospel. Top posting is
"wrong-posting", and only newbies who don't know any better do it. Speak for
yourself, Ray - I, and many others, would rather not have to scroll down in
each post
to see the new material. I want to see it at the top, and scroll down if I
need to refresh my memory as to the context. I am not a newby - I've been in
the
computer business for 26 years, and on the internet about as long as there
was
one (BBSs before that - top posting was quite common then, too).

I do agree that the poster should trim out non-relevant material from prior
posts, though.

Regards,
Charlie Noah

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

[snip]
  Without interposting, you have no idea where the reply
fits into the thread.  If you are a reader that typically reads
through an entire thread, when it's essentially dead, and don't mind
the occasional reply that's out of place because somebody has their
clock out of sync, or the time zone set incorrectly, then that's fine
for you.  But top-posting still makes things more difficult for just
about everybody else.

The byte flow problem, is the one that directly affects Cliff and the
digests.  Unfortunately, 99.% of Top-Posters neglect to trim the
quoted message to the relevant material.  That wastes huge amounts of
bandwidth.
[snip]
There really are no valid reasons to top-post, but there are plenty
of valid reasons to inter-post and trim the quoted material.  That's
why it's been a flameable action on Usenet for over twenty years.
Top-posting has only become more common in recent years because OE
and a few other email/newsreader hybrids (that really don't do either
well) make it tough to reply correctly and newbies are showing up
everyday, not just in the first couple of weeks in September.
Insisting on top-posting and not trimming the quoted material,
especially when there's replies that have already been right-posted
(aka inter-posted), I hate to say it, is just plain rude and self
serving.  Please take a moment and read the material listed in the
two links previously provided.  If you missed them, here they are
again:

http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting

Ray
-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

RE: UniVerse and Backup Exec

[Dennis Bartlett]

Hi Gwen

We're running UniVerse 10.0.4 (a known baddie as it is) and
Backup Exec,
tho' which I don't know off hand. We also get plenty app
errors

We've had 47 system crashes sinces Aug '03, which IBM have
first blamed
on Backup Exec, then told us "that 10.1 would fix it"
thereby admitting
the problem lay in UV.

When pressed to supply us 10.1 to fix the problem, the
answer was that
we'd have to wait for 10.1.1 as that was specific for "our
platform"

We originally thought the problem might lie in the way the
system (incl
W2K) had been loaded, and so re-installed W2K Server, then
Backup Exec,
then used that to restore the system. Didn't work.

We're still running B/E on the UV server, the system crashed
twice
yesterday, and once today, and management still doesn't see
the need to
change servers / UV's just yet.

One thing tho' we did do when tweaking the reloaded
UniVerse - we
modified a registry key that some bright spark had
discovered helped B/E
and UV to co-exist. What that tweak is I don't remember -
but I know
that the guy who does is also on this list - Kurt, please
supply!

Something else that IBM said might fix the problem was if we
installed
B/E on a different server and backed up over the network...


dennis

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of
At 09:18 AM 2/17/04 -0500, you wrote:
>I am running:
>UniVerse 10.0.17
>Windows 2000 SP 4
>Veritas Backup Exec:  Media Server & Admin. Console: Ver
9.00 Rev 4454



>Thanks in advance for any help you can offer!
>Gwen Buck
>Gaska Tape Inc.
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>--
>u2-users mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

--
Steven M Wagner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cary, North Carolina, United States of America

--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

RE: VSG Invalid procedure call SCHEMA_ATTRIBUTE_MAP

[Kerry Gasque]

I checked the global catalog space for our UniData account and the
subroutines are there and are the same version as are in our UniData bin
directory.

Thanks,
Kerry Gasque
Systems Developer/Analyst

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/19/2004 1:44:47 AM >>>
on  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote::

> I am using Visual Schema Generator to SQLize some UniData
> files

[snip]

> I am getting the
> message "Died in UCI::SQLExecDirect() with SQLSTATE S1001, Native
> error:0 [IBM][SQL Client][UNIDATA] Invalid procedure call:
> SCHEMA_ATTRIBUTE_MAP".  Does anyone know what this means or what is
> causing it.

There are a number of subroutines which need to be globally cataloged
on the
UniData server for VSG to work properly.  SCHEMA_ATTRIBUTE_MAP is one
of
them and it doesn't seem to be cataloged on your box.

You'll probably find the compiled object on the machine somewhere under
the
UniData bin directory - where it is loaded off tape or CD on install. 
Copy
anything that starts with SCHEMA_ that you find into the 's'
subdirectory of
the global catalog CTLG directory and then try again with VSG.

HTH,

Ken


-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

RE: WinteGrate

[Anthony Youngman]

Put all the jpegs in a directory on the nix box.

Share that directory to the doze boxes using SAMBA.

Use the wIntegrate "execute command on pc" function to display the file.

I'm not sure how you do it, but I think you can just try to execute the
jpeg, and Windows will automatically invoke the default viewer.

Cheers,
Wol 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Barry Rogen
Sent: 19 February 2004 13:41
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: WinteGrate


 Question:  Using WinteGrate, running UniVerse 10, Unix - Is there
a way to display a 'jpeg' file in UniVerse ?
We have trucking companies that send up 'proof of
deliveries' in jpeg format. Our user base would love
to be able to view them straight from UniVerse.

As always, very appreciative for ideas/assistance

Barry Rogen
Senior Programmer
PNY  Technologies
(973) 515 - 9700  ext 5327
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
The quality of a person's life is in direct
proportion to their commitment to excellence
regardless of their chosen field of endeavor
   vince lombardi
_


This e-mail message from PNY Technologies, Inc. is for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users




***

This transmission is intended for the named recipient only. It may contain private and 
confidential information. If this has come to you in error you must not act on 
anything disclosed in it, nor must you copy it, modify it, disseminate it in any way, 
or show it to anyone. Please e-mail the sender to inform us of the transmission error 
or telephone ECA International immediately and delete the e-mail from your information 
system.

Telephone numbers for ECA International offices are: Sydney +61 (0)2 9911 7799, Hong 
Kong + 852 2121 2388, London +44 (0)20 7351 5000 and New York +1 212 582 2333.

***

--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

WinteGrate

[Barry Rogen]

 Question:  Using WinteGrate, running UniVerse 10, Unix - Is there
a way to display a 'jpeg' file in UniVerse ?
We have trucking companies that send up 'proof of
deliveries' in jpeg format. Our user base would love
to be able to view them straight from UniVerse.

As always, very appreciative for ideas/assistance

Barry Rogen
Senior Programmer
PNY  Technologies
(973) 515 - 9700  ext 5327
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
The quality of a person's life is in direct
proportion to their commitment to excellence
regardless of their chosen field of endeavor
   vince lombardi
_


This e-mail message from PNY Technologies, Inc. is for the sole use of the intended 
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized 
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended 
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the 
original message.

--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

DOWNLOAD version 7.10 available

[David L. Rotman]

I am pleased to announce that version 7.10 of DOWNLOAD is
available for free from:
ftp.cedarville.edu 

For those not familiar with DOWNLOAD, it is a "command-line"
utility which extracts data from Unidata/Universe databases
and produces output files in a variety of formats (XML, HTML,
tab-delimited, word-processing merge, etc.).  The syntax
is similar to the LIST statement.  Installation is fairly painless
using the installation paragraph provided.  A PDF reference
manual is provided.

Changes in version 7.10 include the capability to insert
text at the start of XML and HTML files (for things like
name-space references, style-sheet references, etc.).
There have also been changes in subroutine names
and cataloging options to provide a better fit in
organizations where there were naming or style
conflicts.

A summary of the changes appears below.

As usual, please let me know if you have any problems
with installation or operation.


Dave Rotman



Version 7.10:
*   Added qualifier XML.ALLOW.CHARACTERS.
*   Added DEFAULT XML.ALLOW.CHARACTERS.
*   Allow null association names in XML.
*   Added HTML.HEAD.
*   Return HTML tags in lower case for compatibility with XHTML.
*   Bug fix (allow NUM.SUBVALUES ALL for FORMAT HTML)
*   Bug fix (abort execution if @RECORD returns no entries)
*   Bug fix (honor EOR.CHAR in XML heading lines)
*   Bug fix (use "head" instead of "heading" in HTML format)   

*   Bug fix (use "th" for table headings instead of "td")
*   Renamed several external subroutines:
*  EXPAND.ITEMS  to DL.EXPAND.ITEMS
*  FLIP.8TH.BIT  to DL.FLIP.8TH.BIT
*  GET.KEYWORD.VALUE to DL.GET.KEYWORD.VALUE
*  OPEN.FILE to DL .OPEN.FILE
*  PARSE.COMMAND.LINEto DL.PARSE.COMMAND.LINE
*  PROMPT.ANSto DL.PROMPT.ANS
*  PROMPT.STACK  to DL.PROMPT.STACK
*  VIEW.FILE to DL.VIEW.FILE
*  VIEW.SEQ.FILE to DL.VIEW.SEQ.FILE
*   Added options for cataloging globally or locally during
instalation.

For folks who might be on an older release, here are
the changes that were made when release 7.00 came out
last year:
*Added EVAL functionality for output of expressions.
*Incorporated EVAL and data-field functionality into various
*   HTML and XML options.
*Added COL.HDG qualifier.
*Added XML.GROUP.NAME qualifier.
*Enabled XML.ATTRIBUTE within associated fields.
*Modified the APPEND logic to allow this function to work in
*   Universe.
*Enabled APPEND for HTML and XML output.
*Added support for NUM.VALUES when specifying the key
*   to a SECONDARY.FILE (especially useful with XML).
*Added '@RECORD' as a method for specifying output fields.
*Consolidated redundant code in DOWNLOAD.PARSE.
*Added 'DOWNLOAD HELP MAX' to show the various maximum
*   values for literals, fields, etc.
*Systematized DEBUG.LEVEL arguments (see documentation file for
*   details).
*Conformed all variables in I_DOWNLOAD_OUT_REC_COMMON to a
*   consistent naming scheme.
*Bug fix (recognize VOC entries with type LF and LD)
*Bug fix (recognize DICT records of type V)
*Bug fix (comma-quote fields with a format specification shorter
*   than the actual data length would produce unpredictable
*   results)
*Bug fix (exploded list was not being honored by secondary files)



Dave Rotman
Director of Computer Services
Cedarville University
251 N. Main Street
Cedarville, OH 45314
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
voice 937-766-7905
fax 937-766-8819
-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Re: [ADMIN] The aforementioned and promised NAG about OVERQUOTING

[CWNoah2]

Well, Ray has spoken, so I guess that makes it gospel. Top posting is 
"wrong-posting", and only newbies who don't know any better do it. Speak for 
yourself, Ray - I, and many others, would rather not have to scroll down in each post 
to see the new material. I want to see it at the top, and scroll down if I 
need to refresh my memory as to the context. I am not a newby - I've been in the 
computer business for 26 years, and on the internet about as long as there was 
one (BBSs before that - top posting was quite common then, too).

I do agree that the poster should trim out non-relevant material from prior 
posts, though.

Regards,
Charlie Noah

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

[snip]
  Without interposting, you have no idea where the reply 
fits into the thread.  If you are a reader that typically reads 
through an entire thread, when it's essentially dead, and don't mind 
the occasional reply that's out of place because somebody has their 
clock out of sync, or the time zone set incorrectly, then that's fine 
for you.  But top-posting still makes things more difficult for just 
about everybody else.

The byte flow problem, is the one that directly affects Cliff and the 
digests.  Unfortunately, 99.% of Top-Posters neglect to trim the 
quoted message to the relevant material.  That wastes huge amounts of 
bandwidth.
[snip]
There really are no valid reasons to top-post, but there are plenty 
of valid reasons to inter-post and trim the quoted material.  That's 
why it's been a flameable action on Usenet for over twenty years. 
Top-posting has only become more common in recent years because OE 
and a few other email/newsreader hybrids (that really don't do either 
well) make it tough to reply correctly and newbies are showing up 
everyday, not just in the first couple of weeks in September. 
Insisting on top-posting and not trimming the quoted material, 
especially when there's replies that have already been right-posted 
(aka inter-posted), I hate to say it, is just plain rude and self 
serving.  Please take a moment and read the material listed in the 
two links previously provided.  If you missed them, here they are 
again:

http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting

Ray
-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

RE: version control software

[Brian Leach]

Jeff,

We use a two pronged attack - I don't think I can share it (sorry) but here
is what it does - none of it should be too difficult to emulate:

First we have some BASIC routines that stamp our programs with a string in
the format:

ADGVERDATA='Version=x;'
ADGVERDATA:= 'VerDate=xx;'
ADGVERDATA:='VerHist=xx' 
etc.

The format of the string means that we can search both source and object
code for version stamps (being a variable assignment not a comment they get
compiled into the object code string table). We have some simple subroutines
that return this version information which we can use e.g. from
I-Descriptors to list the versions and from setup routines to check
versions; and we have wrappers around our installation routines and checks
in the routine we use for any global cataloging to ensure that we don't
accidentally catalog an older routine over a newer version.

Secondly, we use RCS for delta-ing (we could use CVS but RCS was a simpler
option for interfacing). To allow it to handle non-source items (eg
dictionaries and parameter records) we wrapper the RCS routines (ci and co)
through some routines that essentially maintain an index of the UniVerse
location (ACCOUNT DICT FILE LEVEL ITEM) to a numbered UNIX file. These allow
allow us to things like accept select lists, so the whole thing is command
line driven and very flexible.

The routines maintain an index between our version stamps (which are 3 level
major.minor.build) and the RCS version (which is 2 level major.minor) so we
can search on either. We also apply tags in the index rather than using RCS
tags, which are a bit flaky.
 
The routines use the index to copy the item to a type 19 file using
sequentially assigned IDs, then commit the copy to RCS. The same index is
used to retrieve the item again, and optionally copy the item back to its
original location OR to a new location (another reason for using the index).

As most of our applications are client/server or Web based, we then apply
CVS to our whole development environment, including the RCS repository.


Hope this helps,

Brian Leach





-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeff Steinmetz
Sent: 19 February 2004 02:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: version control software





I am looking for a version control application for U2 software development.
Ideally it would have a check-out/check-in function, ability to track
changes, migration dates, etc

Does anyone have any suggestions?


Jeff Steinmetz
Vice President, Store Systems
Guitar Center, Inc
5795 Lindero Canyon Road
Westlake Village, CA 91362
818-735-8800 ext 2248
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


This email was checked by MessageLabs SkyScan before entering Microgen.



This email was checked on leaving Microgen for viruses, similar
malicious code and inappropriate content by MessageLabs SkyScan.

DISCLAIMER

This email and any attachments are confidential and may also be
privileged.

If you are not the named recipient, please notify the sender
immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other
person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information.

In the event of any technical difficulty with this email, please
contact the sender or [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Microgen Information Management Solutions
http://www.microgen.co.uk
-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

[OT] Looking for U2 owners in northern suburbs PA, USA

[Rich Sias]

** Reply to message from "Rich Sias" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 18 Feb 2004
11:13:28 -0500

> Well, I got to start my searching for gainful employment. I have used 2.5 weeks
> just working on refining the resume, it is near done soon and I need to gather
> potential sites near where I live first.
> 
> Contact me directly with places (company names) and other details if known and
> date of last contact if old knowledge.  If you had a contact name and or phone
> number that would be even nicer.  Can be former employers, current ones,
> customers, buyers or other contacts that you are aware they own a U2 system and
> just might need a DBA or such.

Hmmm, I left out any clue on city

Philadelphia, PA USA   (Northern Suburbs)
Northern Suburbs are nearby Doylestown for me.

Although looks more like choice of change careers or move elsewhere.

For those who already knew me, thanks for the replies.

Rich Sias
-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users