freecad packages for Ubuntu
Hi there. I'm needing some features that are in FreeCAD 18.5 or later. What are the odds of seeing FreeCAD 19.2 or 20.1 in the focal-backports repository so those of us running Ubuntu LTS releases (and other distros based on Ubuntu LTS releases) can get an updated version through the backports repository? I'm a FreeCAD user on Ubuntu 20.04LTS (by way of Linux Mint). Currently, the package in the Ubuntu Focal repositories is FreeCad version 18.4, and there's nothing in the focal-backports repository for a newer version. I do see 19.2 is in the jammy and kinetic repositories, and the current 20.1 version is in kinetic-proposed. Can either of these version s be put in focal-backports? That's what the backports repository is for. PS, if you need some testing (and have test scripts I can run or whatever), I might be able to help with that some. I'm a user, not a software developer, but I do have some technical experience, even in the software development arena (from long ago in a previous lifetime/career). -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: Call for nominations: Developer Membership Board
Since we have not yet enough nominations and it was the same situation at last election 2 years ago, I started to think about what can be changed in our approach. One thing that comes to my mind is what if the nomination were public ? Right now it is private and only visible to the DMB team. It is only public once the condorcet vote officially start. Would it helps having more folks nominating themselves (ripple effect) if they see someone they know give it a try ? Would it make the nomination less intimidating for some individuals ? Regards, Eric On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 4:06 PM Robie Basak wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 01:32:35PM +, Robie Basak wrote: > > The membership terms for two members (Jeremy Bicha and Mathieu > > Trudel-Lapierre) have expired, and the terms of the remaining members > > (Eric Desrochers, Micah Gersten, Robie Basak, Simon Quigley and Łukasz > > Zemczak) expire in May. Subsequently, this email is a call for > > nominations to fill their positions. > > We don't yet have enough nominations to fill the seats that are up for > election. In recent years the DMB has routinely been short-staffed, > blocking us from being able to appoint more Ubuntu developers. > > If you are a core dev or MOTU, please consider spending one hour every > other Monday to help others join us by nominating yourself for a seat on > the DMB[1]. > > Thanks, > > Robie > > [1] > https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-announce/2020-January/001270.html > -- > ubuntu-devel mailing list > ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel > -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: Announcing release 3.48 of reposurgeon
Jeremy Bicha :
> > Is there any specific notification channel you would recommend?
>
> It's unnecessary. reposurgeon like many Ubuntu packages is maintained
> in Debian. The Debian packaging includes a "watch" file which is used
> in several places in Debian to allow interested people to easily see
> which packages are out of date.
>
> See for instance: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/reposurgeon
Usedfl information, thanks.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Announcing release 3.48 of reposurgeon
Release 3.48 of reposurgeon is now available at: http://www.catb.org/~esr/reposurgeon Here are the most recent changes: Last Python release. 4.0 will ship in Go. Corrected a minor error in Hg branch coloring. Subversion write support has been deemed too weak to live and removed. -- shipper, acting for Eric S. Raymond -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Announcing release 3.47 of reposurgeon
Release 3.47 of reposurgeon is now available at: http://www.catb.org/~esr/reposurgeon Here are the most recent changes: Fix for a crash bug when backing out of a script failure. Fix for an error that caused premature exit from the divide command. Repositories created by expunge command now have correct ancestor marks. Insert newly created blobs after front events. Minor repair to translation of Subversion default ignores. Add --noignores read option to suppress filling in default Subversion ignores. Results of reorder and reparent ae no longer toposorted. Fix: repocutter was not patching Node-copyfrom-rev fields as it should. -- shipper, acting for Eric S. Raymond -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: Application for Contributing Developer: Seyeong Kim
Hello everyone, Please congratulate Seyeong Kim (xtrusia) on his today's successful contributing developer application ! On behalf of the DMB, Eric Desrochers (slashd) On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 8:27 PM Seyeong Kim wrote: > Hello > > I would like to apply for Contributing Developer. > > My application is here > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/xtrusia/contributingdeveloper > -- > Devel-permissions mailing list > devel-permissi...@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/devel-permissions > -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Announcing release 3.0.0 of gif2png
Release 3.0.0 of gif2png is now available at: http://www.catb.org/~esr/gif2png Here are the most recent changes: Code ported to Go. -- shipper, acting for Eric S. Raymond -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Announcing release 2.5.14 of gif2png
Release 2.5.14 of gif2png is now available at: http://www.catb.org/~esr/gif2png Here are the most recent changes: Redirect segfault to a graceful exit. Tired of meaningless fuzzer bugs. -- shipper, acting for Eric S. Raymond -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
New Ubuntu Core Developer - Dan Streetman
Hello everyone, Please congratulate ddstreet on his today's successful core-dev application! Welcome to the team! On behalf of the DMB, Eric Desrochers (slashd) -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Announcing release 3.46 of reposurgeon
Release 3.46 of reposurgeon is now available at: http://www.catb.org/~esr/reposurgeon Here are the most recent changes: Added 'relax' no-op command. Added bug warning about repocutter not handling Mac line terminations. Fix for GitLab issue #117: malformed attribution. Repocutter help command has been repaired. Command renames: mailbox_in - msgin, mailbox_out - msgout. The exec and eval commands have been removed. Scripts now bail out on error; "relax" suppresses this. Fixes for repocutter strip and patherename (GitLab issues #18 #142) Document some limitations of repocutter sift and expunge. -- shipper, acting for Eric S. Raymond -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Announcing release 1.8 of open-adventure
Release 1.8 of open-adventure is now available at: http://www.catb.org/~esr/open-adventure Here are the most recent changes: Minor typo and capitalization glitches in user-visible text fixed documented. Save format has changed. -- shipper, acting for Eric S. Raymond -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Rik Mills : MOTU Application
Monday, March 25th, the DMB voted to grant Rik Mills (acheronuk) MOTU privileges. Congratulations, Rik ! On behalf of the DMB, Eric Desrochers -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Announcing release 2.5.13 of gif2png
Release 2.5.13 of gif2png is now available at: http://www.catb.org/~esr/gif2png Here are the most recent changes: Include NEWS and test directory in distributed tarball. -- shipper, acting for Eric S. Raymond -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Announcing release 2.19 of doclifter
Release 2.19 of doclifter is now available at: http://www.catb.org/~esr/doclifter Here are the most recent changes: Handle .Bf/.Ef in mdoc. -- shipper, acting for Eric S. Raymond -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Request for bison refresh
This is a nudge about the Bison package in bionic. The NTPsec project (which I lead) needs a warning suppression that made it into Bison 3.0.5. Bionic presently packages 3.0.4. Upgrade please? -- http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects. -- Robert A. Heinlein, "Time Enough for Love" -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: PPU Application for curtin, cloud-init projects
Monday, January 28th, the DMB voted to grant Ryan Harper (launchpad id: raharper) PPU privileges to "cloud-init" and "curtin". Congratulations, Ryan ! On behalf of the DMB, Eric Desrochers On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 2:38 PM Ryan Harper wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to announce my application[1] for PPU rights to cloud-init > and curtin packages as part of the Ubuntu Server Team. > > 1. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/RyanHarper/DeveloperApplicationPPU > > Thank you in advance, > Ryan Harper > -- > Devel-permissions mailing list > devel-permissi...@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/devel-permissions > -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Looking for Contact for OpenSSL on Trusty to be updated
Hi folks, I am looking for a contact to reach out in regards https://packages.ubuntu.com/trusty/openssl on Trusty and having an update to the OpenSSL package updated with CVE-2017-3733 Please kindly forward a contact, appreciated it. I reached this contact via Maintainer: * Ubuntu Developers<mailto:ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com> (Mail Archive<http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/>) Thank you, Eric. --- This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. --- -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: Proposal: new ~ubuntu-sru-uploaders team [was: Unblocking SRU uploader permissions]
On 2017-02-28 07:57 AM, Robie Basak wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 07:09:12PM +, Robie Basak wrote: >> Thank you for the discussion on this. I propose to go ahead and add a >> new ~ubuntu-sru-uploaders team that can upload to any main or universe >> package in any stable release in the usual way, but not to the >> development release. The team would owned and managed by the DMB through >> the usual application process. I believe the DMB has the remit to do >> this, so I'm now asking for a DMB vote. > The DMB approved this yesterday with four votes (unanimous amongst those > who made the meeting). > > We agreed the following policy: > > To join ~ubuntu-sru-uploaders, the DMB expects: > > 1) a good track record of sponsored SRUs, a demonstrated understanding > of SRU policies, requirements and process through that track record > including driving SRUs through to the end, not letting things languish > in -proposed; > > 2) endorsement from SRU sponsors [by this we mean regular sponsors who > have sponsored the applicant's SRUs]; > > 3) the usual requirements and expectations for any uploader; > > 4) plus [the application of the usual] DMB member judgement. > > There was some concern about potential bad uploads bothering the SRU > team, so to mitigate this we also agreed that individual > ~ubuntu-sru-uploaders membership will be removed if any of: > > 1) ~ubuntu-sru resolves to remove the member (how they do so is up to > them); > > 2) or the DMB resolves to remove the member by a quorate vote, and a > vote will be held if any member of ~ubuntu-sru requests it. > > I hope this will never be required, of course. > > I'll create the team and request that the TB add it to the appropriate > Launchpad ACL when the first member's application is approved. > > I know there is significant interest in Canonical STS staff joining this > new team, and I have been asked when to start applying and so on. > > I think it's fine to apply now, but to ramp this up gradually and be > considerate to applicants applying for membership of other teams, I ask > that the DMB handle a maximum of one ~ubuntu-sru-uploaders application > per meeting until any initial wave is done. This is in addition to the > current two applications per meeting limit we have at the moment. > > Eric, as you already have an outstanding application that got held > pending the resolution of this issue, do you want to apply first? Yes, I'll prepare my application for the sru-uploader team for the next DMB meeting. > > To all potential applicants: please remember that we do still have the > requirements as above. Since this team will grant Ubuntu membership, a > "significant and sustained" contribution to Ubuntu is still required. If > you don't have a nice set of SRUs that you have driven and have had > straightforwardly sponsored, or you don't have existing uploaders who > have sponsored your work and are ready to endorse you, you should > probably continue getting SRUs sponsored and defer your application > until you feel that you do meet these requirements. > > I hope this new team will help get good quality SRUs landed with less > delay. And whether you are a member of this team or not, thank you for > helping Ubuntu out. re Thank you very much for you effort on this Robie. We really appreciated. > > Robie -- Eric Desrochers Software Engineer | Sustaining Engineering Team Canonical Canada, Ltd www.canonical.com | www.ubuntu.com -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Announcing release 2.18 of irker
Release 2.18 of irker is now available at: http://www.catb.org/~esr/irker Here are the most recent changes: Add the ability to set the notification-message template (Debian bug #824512) -- shipper, acting for Eric S. Raymond <e...@thyrsus.com> -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Announcing release 2.17 of irker
Release 2.17 of irker is now available at: http://www.catb.org/~esr/irker Here are the most recent changes: Add a reconnect delay (Debian bug #749650). Add proxy support (requres setting some variables in the source file). Use git abbreviated hash to address Debian complaints. -- shipper, acting for Eric S. Raymond <e...@thyrsus.com> -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Announcing release 2.16 of irker
Release 2.16 of irker is now available at: http://www.catb.org/~esr/irker Here are the most recent changes: Code now runs under either Python 2 or Python 3 -- shipper, acting for Eric S. Raymond <e...@thyrsus.com> -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Announcing release 2.15 of irker
Release 2.15 of irker is now available at: http://www.catb.org/~esr/irker Here are the most recent changes: Emergency backout of getaddrinfo, it randomly hanges. -- shipper, acting for Eric S. Raymond <e...@thyrsus.com> -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Announcing release 2.13 of irker
Release 2.13 of irker is now available at: http://www.catb.org/~esr/irker Here are the most recent changes: SSL validation fix. Hardening agains Unicode decode errors. irk becomes a library so it can be re-used. -- shipper, acting for Eric S. Raymond e...@thyrsus.com -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Call for contributors for the next two cycles
I can do development. I have been really busy lately but can try to fit it in. Bug fixes, whatever... Lmk what works best! Eric W. -- Sent from my Android phone with mail.com Mail. Please excuse my brevity.Kaj Ailomaa zeque...@mousike.me wrote: I would like to know who are willing to contribute in developing Ubuntu Studio the next one or two releases. I already know some of you: Len, Janne, Jimmy and madeinkobaia. We need help in these areas: * documentation (especially in making videos) * testing (both doing testing and writing test cases) * artwork * PR (spreading the word) * development (packaging, application development and bug fixing) If you would like to help, just answer to this email. Let us know a little bit who you are and what you would like to do. Or, contact us on our IRC channel #ubuntustudio-devel at irc.freenode.net. -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Hello
Is this specific to the Ubuntu Studio section of the forums? -Eric On 2 Feb 2015 20:30, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote: On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 23:12:01 -0500, Mike Holstein wrote: how can i help you? im not clear on what your question is regarding.. I deleted the OP's mail. Somebody needs to translate it. Anyway ... 2015-02-02 5:49 GMT-05:00 Önder ÖNEr onderone...@gmail.com: Ubuntu forum kurallarında, moderatörleri, kullanıcılara, kibar ve ^ seçkin olmaya davet editorum.. Önder Öner So there might be an issue on the Ubuntu forum regarding moderation and editing. -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] ubuntu-studio-devel Digest, Vol 85, Issue 5
The trouble with creating such a list is the sheer upkeep of said list. There are bug listings and some blueprints in launchpad (on my phone now so I don't have the links), but the development team does much more than that. Art for each release (icons, wallpapers, etc...), documentation for new procedures, testing on various platforms, finding new features to add (new program releases), packaging new programs, etc... the list is large and constantly changing. Well it's either constantly changing or it's too generic to be meaningful. Essentially, if you'd like to help out one of the first steps is opening an IRC chat client like xchat and going to the #ubuntustudio-devel room to start asking what you can help with, then just pick a direction and do it. We're all friendly, just start asking questions and decide where your strengths fit in. -Eric On 12 May 2014 05:37, Joseph Ronne jfro...@gmail.com wrote: It would be nice to see a list of the tasks, just to get an Idea of where to fit in .. -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
New Developer
Hello. I have had a passion for Ubuntu and open source several years now, and although I attempted many times to jump in to contributing, I could never seem to find the courage or correct place to start. So, I'm writing this in the hopes that someone might point me in the correct direction. I have read all the beginning development guides, and while the information there was helpful, I couldn't pinpoint a place for me to begin working. I'm looking for some tasks that require less of a learning curve that I can start immediately. I have already looked at the ubuntu bug tracker, but I could not seem to find a good starting place there as most of the bugs seemed rather specific to a certain program or technology that I am unfamiliar with, but would like to eventually! Anyway, I hope this reaches the ears of someone who can help me, as I am quite eager to begin working. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: Making Studio work with more than one DE
This really was one of the most dramatic train/thread derailments I've seen in a while. Impressive. As far as other desktop environments are concerned, part of me is in favour of this mindset being adopted (as I've never left gnome despite Ubuntu Studio's switch to xfce - I just don't like that DE). If a modular front end was adopted then it would encourage wider usage and a better overall design. However, what Hartmut may have been trying to state was that this is development is probably not the best use of developer's time. There have almost always been stability issues, bugs, and lack of documentation in Ubuntu Studio that the user sees as more drastic to their workflow than annoying quirks from the given DE. So yeah, apply force to the major problems, but it would be a prudent philosophy to reduce the amount of xfce-specific code that ships with the distro. We don't know how long into the future the xfce platform will best suit our needs (very little warning was given during the gnome/unity move that prompted our switch to xfce in the first place), and the lack of DE-specific code the easier it will be for those of us who love a different DE to just switch. -Eric Hedekar * Eric Hedekar *http://www.erichedekar.com On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.netwrote: Getting audio working for audio production, with some bloated desktop environments is not very useful. Some desktop environemts do start a chunk of services by default to automagically enable usage for many things, so the user needs to customize those desktops for audio work, or somebody from the community has to do it. There are common workflows for pro-audio work and even while I could add a list of odd things, caused by Xfce, it's a sane choice to use it as the default for Ubuntu Studio. I'm using it on other Linux installs too. Pulseaudio is something that should be discussed. It's not an issue to have it installed and to disable it, but it's an issue for users who start sessions by scripts, if there is the need to start qjackctl, but to kill qjackctl.real or what ever it's called ;). I don't remember what the qjackctl(.fake)-script does and can't take a look at it at the moment, but IIRC it did something that also could be started by qjackctl, instead of naming a script qjackctl and then let it start qjackctl.real. IMO it's already annoying if I need to start an app by it's name, but to kill it by killing python, however, this at least makes sense, while this qjackctl.thingy is an exotic Ubuntu Studio unique thing, that IMO isn't well thought out. A wrapper sometimes is useful, but this wrapper is strange. -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: LMMS
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Len Ovens l...@ovenwerks.net wrote: The ubuntu version of LMMS seems to come with VST support including wine (depends not recomends). We have had some of this stuff before and there has been issues with 64bit ISO builds as I recall. In other words a 64bit machine can load wine but the ISO still doesn't build. We had that problem before we went to live ISO... so there would be another problem as well. When wine loads it grabs the windows fonts which are free but licensed. The user has to ok the license. I don't know that this would be possible with ubiquity... Doesn't work with jackd. It may be best to leave it as extra SW. Interesting thing is that as installed, the software center can't see LMMS even though synaptic can. The sources have to be added under other software - Canonical Partners and/or Independent, before it shows up. This may mean it is not considered to be _in_ the ubuntu repos. Also after ISO install software center can't install software until the update manager has been run at least once (bug reported and confirmed, seems not to be a US problem). -- Len Ovens www.OvenWerks.net Quite right. There are licensing issues that LMMS is currently built with in the repos that we can't exactly include by default. It would take a lot of work to tweak and maintain a different LMMS build, and even then we'd be creating a reduced feature set for the end user and those who really want to use the program would likely install a different version (or be discouraged by our included version and not use the program at all). It's probably best to stick with more fully open and free software, suggesting LMMS to those interested in using VST-based production methods, possibly via a suggestion in our help documents. - Eric Hedekar -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: LMMS
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Len Ovens l...@ovenwerks.net wrote: On Sun, October 14, 2012 6:20 pm, Eric Hedekar wrote: Also, I just checked. The LMMS binary is built upstream in Debian and inherited into Ubuntu. So disabling the wine dependency (and thus VST support) would then disable it for all Debian distributions. I don't believe this is an option worth considering. Wouldn't listing the fonts package in the blacklist seed stop the live ISO from adding that? I think we should try it. I think it would do one of three things: 1) apt will try and install it anyway and the ISO won't build 2) apt will add it to the stuff that needs to be installed but won't because of the blacklist and so will download the installer at install time and at first update will run the installer and the user will get the license screen. 3) the font will not install and the user will not be able to install afterwards either (because of black list - I don't think so) 4) (where did this come from?) the font will not install but the user will be able to install latter. 1 and 3 are bad, 2 and 4 are ok. 1a) apt will add it to the ISO build but the accept will not happen so it won't load... this may be ok. So now its five things :) I'm not exactly sure what will take place if the recommended font package gets blacklisted. I'm also not sure of the legality of this - i.e. will the font package in question appear on our ISO and do we have legal rights to do this with our/ubuntu's distribution policies? I will say that the users may complain that wine does not run nicely unless these fonts are installed after. If you've blacklisted the fonts then can they ever install them without throwing a conflict error? There's a lot of testing that will need to be worked on here. Wine is quite a big element of many people's computers. Be careful what you blacklist. Fairly soon I think some MOTU consultation should take place on this matter. Len can you look into these questions? -Eric -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: LMMS?
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:44 AM, Mike Holstein mikeh...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Kaj Ailomaa zeque...@mousike.me wrote: ** On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:15:30 +0200, Scott Lavender scottalaven...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Ho Wan Chan smartbo...@gmail.comwrote: Hi all. In #ubuntustudio today somebody asked if we should add LMMS to it. I agree we need to since it is a crucial part of the system and it takes only about 10 MB of disk space so... BTW I talked to Nicholas Skaggs and the final decision was to dump the manual partitioning and auto-resize testcases and only remain the entire disk one along with live session and the forecoming post-installation testcases. Thanks everybody Regards, Howard Chan (smartboyhw) -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel I think characterizing this as a crucial part of the system might be misrepresenting LMMS as I think Ubuntu Studio is quite functional in numerous use cases. We should also consider how many people are asking for LMMS. If we included every application asked for, we would easily oversize the 4gig image. I have been worried about making everyone download extra megs (oh, won't someone think of the bandwidth) because one person said we should include something. However, I am not opposed to including it. I just want to make sure we evaluate the inclusion on it's own merits, that we are supported a complete work flow (i.e. there are no other applications needed to support getting the task done), and the user demand warrants inclusion. I look forward to other's input. ScottL I think it's a valid addition. I know some people prefer this kind of applications to Qtractor or Ardour. On their homepage they make reference to LMMS being a Linux alternative to FL Studio. In my experience there are FL Studio people, and then there is the other kind. Don't use it myself, but I definitely think it fills a workflow hole for a good portion of people. i found LMMS to be crashy in 10.04... and i havent used it since really. if its stable and something that others want added, im OK with that. i always thought that even if it worked and was stable, my opinion was that it was toy-ish... we cant include *everything* and there are some key pieces of my workflow that are not installed that i have no issues with installing on my own. however, if someone wants to host a meeting, and vote on the inclusion of LMMS, i'll come and participate, and not vote it down, since i have no strong opinions other than it needs to be stable. -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel -- MH mikeholstein.info http://www.mikeholstein.info/ -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel This is certainly not the first discussion we've had about including LMMS, and it probably won't be the last. None of the past conversations have come to a conclusion that it should be included as there are other more polished tools that complete the same or similar workflow. LMMS has had stability issues in the past but maybe it's outgrown these now. My personal vote would be to include it in the 'suggested install' section and leave it off the actual disk. It's possible that reorganization of the workflows and meta packages could find a slot where LMMS fits perfectly, but I don't believe there's a spot it would fill right now. -Eric Hedekar -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: colour selection app
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Len Ovens l...@ovenwerks.net wrote: On Sun, July 29, 2012 6:58 am, Eric Hedekar wrote: Currently there are two color management systems shipped with the graphics package, argyll and gnome-color-management. Neither of these are color pickers. My go-to color picker is gcolor2 and would highly recommend this one to be picked for such a task. I also see that Agave is no longer shipped with the graphics package (silly IMHO, but I mean no offense) this could also be a realistic option. I'm not sure which would be a better selection between Agave and gcolor2 (it depends on your task). Revisting this, Agave seems to have the function that gcolor2 has plus more and there for recommend using this for our color chooser. Cast your vote here Comments please? -- Len Ovens www.OvenWerks.net -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel Agave +1 -Eric -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: a2jmidid auto start
Well many people don't know about a2jmidid so if we start seeing a lot of apps using the new platform it would be good to have it automagically running behind the scenes. This type of sctipt would be perfect to integrate into Ubuntu Studio Controls so users can turn the script on/off. On Apr 9, 2012 12:19 AM, Len Ovens l...@ovenwerks.net wrote: Just tried putting a2jmidid in qjackctl setup as execute script after startup. Seems to work really well for me. I don't know if it is worth while making that a default or not. Not for 12.04 because most of the midi apps aren't jack. I think there will be a number of people using ardour and hydrogen... even adding tracker and qtracker and qsynth doesn't need a2j. But when we add ardour3 that may change unless jackd3 adds that functionality (and gets here by that time). -- Len Ovens www.OvenWerks.net -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Wallpaper suggestion
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Tobias Schröfel tschroe...@googlemail.comwrote: Hey guys, i would like to send you some pictures i created, a friend of mine suggested me to send the pictures to you because maybe you would like them too and consider using them in a future release. Currently the images are licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC-SA but it would be no problem to relicense the images. Also it is no problem to export them to other file formats. Long story short, the images i would like to show you all: http://www.flickr.com/photos/tschroefel/6368302567/in/set-72157628062295781 http://www.flickr.com/photos/tschroefel/6368303055/in/set-72157628062295781 http://www.flickr.com/photos/tschroefel/6368287261/in/set-72157628062295781 Greetings Tobias PS: I was unsure if file attachements or links would be better, if externally hostet images are not wanted i can send the stuff via mail also ;-) -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel Those are certainly nice images that would easily fit into our design goals. I personally prefer 1 3, and since 23 are of the same synth it may be silly to include both. -Eric -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Workflow Meeting
On Nov 7, 2011 12:31 PM, Janne Jokitalo astralj...@kapsi.fi wrote: 2011/11/7 Jon Reagan jreaga...@gmail.com: Hey everyone! As mentioned in the IRC meeting held yesterday, a meeting needs to be scheduled regarding workflows, a method of allowing users to select which packages are installed by their personal needs at first install. snip What time during this week would work for everyone to hold a meeting to discuss this? Missed the initial email, so apologies for breaking the threading/order. I'm available almost any time throughout the week, with the exception of Wednesday between 1000 UTC and 1400 UTC. -- Jaska -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk64QBYACgkQxgcH0NnJT+BpbwCggYLLOO5AW6SOaG2j5nX1z7fL eWcAnAwfl+vdcbXxMij6gl2KMLhfayzn =usj0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel I'd love to be involved in this process. This week I'm free Wed onward from about 00:30utc to roughly 08:30utc each day. Sunday is almost totally open right now too. -Eric Hedekar -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
need help to get this deb package for ubuntu
Dear Ubuntu developers: from the following site http://www.xobas.net/installation_4GL_1_0_6_ubuntu_dapper.html it indicate, there is deb package precompiled binary of pathan (probably 2). libpathan_2.0-1+dbxml228dapper1_i386.deb for ubuntu 6.06 but I can not find it anywhere in the web by myself. thanks any of your point out in advance Eric -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: need help to get this deb package for ubuntu
Because it have educational function to me.(maybe to you too). I have some xml program need it to get compile. On Sat, 2011-08-13 at 21:33 -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: On 13 August 2011 21:07, eric fs...@att.net wrote: Dear Ubuntu developers: from the following site http://www.xobas.net/installation_4GL_1_0_6_ubuntu_dapper.html it indicate, there is deb package precompiled binary of pathan (probably 2). libpathan_2.0-1+dbxml228dapper1_i386.deb for ubuntu 6.06 but I can not find it anywhere in the web by myself. Why are you trying to install no longer supported software on a no longer supported operating system? http://software.decisionsoft.com/ recommends you use xqilla instead of pathan which is in the Ubuntu archives. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases lists the currently supported Ubuntu releases. You need to upgrade to at least Ubuntu 10.04. Jeremy Bicha -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
to install pathan 1
Dear Ubuntu experts: I am on ubuntu10.04(kernel2.6.38-10) I search web about whether there is simple way in ubuntu to install pathan 1, but so far I can not get. Need your help. so, I also tried old way. I download pathan 1, but at first stage of configure, I got error -- my xercesc directory is in /usr/include/ and my pathan 1 directory contain the following files: root@eric-laptop:/home/eric/cppcookbook/ch14/download/libpathan-1.0# ls aclocal.m4docs Makefile runConfigure autotools examples Makefile.defs.in src configure lib objs util configure.in LICENSE.TXT READMEWin32Projects --at configure stage--- checking unicode support in flex... configure: error: not found. Pathan requires a version of flex supporting the -U (16-bit unicode) flag. but I already install flex need expert's help thanks a lot in advance, Eric -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
apt-get install libtinyxml-dev
Dear Ubuntu programers: I am on 10.04, but with kernel 2.6.35-25, with gcc/g++4.5.2 when I tried to install tinyxml, I use apt-get install libtinyxml-dev Setting up libtinyxml-dev (2.5.3-3nf1~ppa1~lucid1) ... Processing triggers for libc-bin ... ldconfig deferred processing now taking place /sbin/ldconfig.real: /usr/local/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.14-gdb.py is not an ELF file - it has the wrong magic bytes at the start. is this log show I am on right track or not? thanks your help in advance, Eric -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Did I miss some package so I can not compile read_write_mutex.hpp in boost?
dear boost progamers: when I tried to compile from my g++4.5.2 a simple file which include #include boost/thread/read_write_mutex.hpp --- root_at_eric-laptop:/home/eric/cppcookbook/ch12# g++ -lboost_thread Example12-3.cpp Example12-3.cpp:3:45: fatal error: boost/thread/read_write_mutex.hpp: No such file or directory compilation terminated. - and I check from / of my ubuntuLinux (10.04) with boost 1.46.1 I can not find any file name as read_wirte_mutex.hpp - root_at_eric-laptop:/# find . | grep read_write_mutex.hpp root_at_eric-laptop:/# --- and I can not digout from web how to make it compile under gcc/g++ plz help, Eric -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: input/output trouble cause segmentation fault
Dear Andreychuk and/or ubuntu developers:
thanks your reply and concern,
it solved
it caused by
my a.out is actually Example 7-7, but I thought it is 7-8, so I enter
7-8's input(suggested by book)
then it cause (bad result), /* but why,
in 7-7, the main line is
vectorstring::iterator p =
partition(v.begin(), v.end(),
bind2nd(lessstring(), foo));
why the input of 7-8 feed in to 7-7 (above) will
cause Segmentation fault?
is another interesting assignment
*/
now I have another question also on this same book,
on its Example 11-11. Generating random numbers using rand
I follow/copy that book's code
it can compile and run
but
I am curious since it is random number and it seed by clock()
srand(static_castunsigned int(clock()));
why it always output same result?
then someone in linuxquestions.org told me, clock() is used as cpu
speed , so it is always same
he suggest I should change it as time()
but then I got compile erros as following
g++ 4.5.2-
eric@eric-laptop:~/cppcookbook/ch11$ g++ Example11-11.cpp
Example11-11.cpp: In function ‘int main()’:
Example11-11.cpp:14:41: error: too few arguments to function ‘time_t
time(time_t*)’
/usr/include/time.h:186:15: note: declared here
I am hard to find any useful resource about how to use time() as
seed to generate random number in web. /* or maybe I not industry
enough */ plz help
Eric
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 22:49 +0400, Dmitry Andreychuk wrote:
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 22:48 -0700, eric wrote:
Dear advanced c/g++ programers:
A program request me to enter twice input
that program probably is tested good on visual c++ 7.1 on window xp,
but my system is g++ on linux(Ubuntu10.04)
It assume
Enter some strings: a b c d
^Z
Enter some more strings: d e f g
^Z
Union: a b c d e f g
Difference: a b c
Intersection: d
all these you can get from page 273 and 274 of book(c++ cookbook)
but my test result is
---
eric@eric-laptop:~/cppcookbook/ch7$ ./a.out
Enter a series of strings: a b c d
^Z
[7]+ Stopped ./a.out
eric@eric-laptop:~/cppcookbook/ch7$ ./a.out
Enter a series of strings: a b c d
{a, b, c, d}
Segmentation fault
---
second case , I used EnterControl-D
first case, I used EnterControl-Z
Sorry for a late answer.
I've just run it and had no segfault (using EnterControl-D).
Ubuntu 11.04; g++ 4.5.2-1ubuntu3
Try debugging it with gdb.
--
Dmitry Andreychuk
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
input/output trouble cause segmentation fault
Dear advanced c/g++ programers:
A program request me to enter twice input
that program probably is tested good on visual c++ 7.1 on window xp,
but my system is g++ on linux(Ubuntu10.04)
It assume
Enter some strings: a b c d
^Z
Enter some more strings: d e f g
^Z
Union: a b c d e f g
Difference: a b c
Intersection: d
all these you can get from page 273 and 274 of book(c++ cookbook)
but my test result is
---
eric@eric-laptop:~/cppcookbook/ch7$ ./a.out
Enter a series of strings: a b c d
^Z
[7]+ Stopped ./a.out
eric@eric-laptop:~/cppcookbook/ch7$ ./a.out
Enter a series of strings: a b c d
{a, b, c, d}
Segmentation fault
---
second case , I used EnterControl-D
first case, I used EnterControl-Z
the following is the program I tested, you still can download from
http://examples.oreilly.com/9780596007614/
// Example 7-8. Unsing set operations
#include iostream
#include algorithm
#include string
#include set
#include iterator
#include utils.h // For parintContainer(): see 7.10
using namespace std;
int main() {
cout Enter some strings:
istream_iteratorstring start(cin);
istream_iteratorstring end;
setstring s1(start, end);
cin.clear();
cout Enter some more strings: ;
setstring s2(++start, end);
setstring setUnion;
setstring setInter;
setstring setDiff;
set_union(s1.begin(), s1.end(),
s2,begin(), s2.end(),
inserter(setUnion, setUnion.begin()));
set_difference(s1.begin(), s1.end(),
s2.begin(), s2.end(),
inserter(setDiff, setDiff.begin()));
cout Union:\n;
printContainer(setUnion);
cout Difference:\n;
printContainer(setDiff);
cout Intersection:\n;
printContainer(setinter);
}
--
utils.h
---
// Example 7-12. Writing your own printing function
#include iostream
#include string
#include algorithm
#include iterator
#include vector
using namespace std;
templatetypename C
void printContainer(const C c, char delim = ',', ostream out = cout)
{
printRange(c.begin(), c.end(), delim, out);
}
templatetypename Fwd
void printRange(Fwd first, Fwd last, char delim = ',', ostream out =
cout) {
out {;
while (first != last) {
out *first;
if (++first != last)
out delim ' ';
}
out } endl;
}
--
Ned and thanks your help a lot in advance
Eric
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
g++4.5.2 cann't compile (Formatting a Date/Time as a String)
Dear Ubuntu programers by g++: I copied a piece simple (Formatting a Date/Time as a String) program from book(c++ cookbook), chapter5 Section2, Example5-4, on page 201. on my g++4.5.2(ubuntu10.04, with kernel 2.6.35-25) you can get that example code from http://examples.oreilly.com/9780596007614/ to test by yourself I got compile errors eric@eric-laptop:~/cppcookbook/ch5$ g++ Example5-4.cpp Example5-4.cpp: In function ‘std::ostream formatDatetime(std::ostream, const tm, const char*)’: Example5-4.cpp:16:17: error: invalid use of incomplete type ‘const struct std::time_putchar’ /usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/../../../../include/c ++/4.5.2/bits/localefwd.h:163:11: error: declaration of ‘const struct std::time_putchar’ Example5-4.cpp: In function ‘std::string dateTimeToString(const tm, const char*)’: Example5-4.cpp:24:31: error: ‘formatDateTime’ was not declared in this scope In file included from /usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/../../../../include/c ++/4.5.2/bits/locale_classes.h:815:0, from /usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/../../../../include/c ++/4.5.2/bits/ios_base.h:43, from /usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/../../../../include/c ++/4.5.2/ios:43, from /usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/../../../../include/c ++/4.5.2/ostream:40, from /usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/../../../../include/c ++/4.5.2/iostream:40, from Example5-4.cpp:2: /usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/../../../../include/c ++/4.5.2/bits/locale_classes.tcc: In function ‘const _Facet std::use_facet(const std::locale) [with _Facet = std::time_putchar]’: Example5-4.cpp:14:77: instantiated from here /usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/../../../../include/c ++/4.5.2/bits/locale_classes.tcc:107:43: error: incomplete type ‘std::time_putchar’ used in nested name specifier /usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/../../../../include/c ++/4.5.2/bits/locale_classes.tcc:112:56: error: cannot dynamic_cast ‘* *(__facets + ((unsigned int)(((unsigned int)__i) * 4u)))’ (of type ‘const class std::locale::facet’) to type ‘const struct std::time_putchar’ (target is not pointer or reference to complete type) eric@eric-laptop:~/cppcookbook/ch5$ need your help to fix it and thanks a lot in advance Eric -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
template export(or export template) features
Dear (Ubuntu linux) g++ programers: In my test with g++4.5.2, I can not make .cpp file contain template unless I instantiate it but that will spoil its flexibility/dynamics to runtime binding. And I certainly think seperate definition from .h file's declaration is better idea. Did anyone know how can I improve it or on higher g++ version, it (g++) have added such feature? From book/internet/web discussion, I knew Comeau and intel(linux) c++ compiler did this years ago. There is a link to advocate/promote such feature. http://warp.povusers.org/programming/export_templates.html like to see your new info/cooperate on this issue sincerely, Eric -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
need to switch from generic to gnu on clocale, plz help
Dear Mathias Klose(of ubuntu/debian):
I am in Ubuntu10.04(but upgrade kernel to 2.6.35-25 through cache)
and self build from(4.4.3 unbuntu's cache) to 4.5.2
but my system not work well in locale and gnu/gcc 's helper
told I probably need to switch from generic to gnu
--
root@eric-laptop:/home/eric/cppcookbook# g++ -v testlocale1.cpp
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/lto-wrapper
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ./configure
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.5.2 (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-shared-libgcc' '-mtune=generic'
'-march=pentiumpro'
/usr/local/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/cc1plus -quiet -v
-D_GNU_SOURCE testlocale1.cpp -quiet -dumpbase testlocale1.cpp
-mtune=generic -march=pentiumpro -auxbase testlocale1 -version
-o /tmp/ccKXdPdt.s
GNU C++ (GCC) version 4.5.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 4.5.2, GMP version 5.0.2, MPFR version 3.0.1,
MPC version 0.9
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param
ggc-min-heapsize=131072
ignoring nonexistent directory
/usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/include
#include ... search starts here:
#include ... search starts here:
/usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/../../../../include/c
++/4.5.2
/usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/../../../../include/c
++/4.5.2/i686-pc-linux-gnu
/usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/../../../../include/c
++/4.5.2/backward
/usr/local/include
/usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/include
/usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/include-fixed
/usr/include
End of search list.
GNU C++ (GCC) version 4.5.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 4.5.2, GMP version 5.0.2, MPFR version 3.0.1,
MPC version 0.9
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param
ggc-min-heapsize=131072
Compiler executable checksum: bf25e0c26b0f7b87953b14877b2b65cc
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-shared-libgcc' '-mtune=generic'
'-march=pentiumpro'
as -V -Qy --32 -o /tmp/ccZdf3kv.o /tmp/ccKXdPdt.s
GNU assembler version 2.20.1 (i486-linux-gnu) using BFD version (GNU
Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.20.1-system.20100303
COMPILER_PATH=/usr/local/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/:/usr/local/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/:/usr/local/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/:/usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/:/usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/
LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/:/usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/../../../:/lib/:/usr/lib/
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-shared-libgcc' '-mtune=generic'
'-march=pentiumpro'
/usr/local/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/collect2 --eh-frame-hdr
-m elf_i386
-dynamic-linker /lib/ld-linux.so.2 /usr/lib/crt1.o /usr/lib/crti.o
/usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/crtbegin.o
-L/usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2
-L/usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/../../.. /tmp/ccZdf3kv.o -lstdc++
-lm -lgcc_s -lgcc -lc -lgcc_s -lgcc
/usr/local/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/crtend.o /usr/lib/crtn.o
Is that in 'mtune=generic'
tognu ?
(guy told me as --enable-clocale=gnu)
because my /generic/c_locale.cc
restrict me too much comparing to /gnu/c_locale.cc
in my /gcc-4.5.2/libstdc++-v3/config/local/ directory
although I don't mind to upgrade/update to higher version of kernel or
gcc/g++, short way by modify configure's internal setting is better for
me.
/* I ever tried to copy/overwrite c_locale.cc in gnu/ directory to
* generic/ directory, then rebuild. But at stage of make, it stop/
* abort/failed by a lot of errors.
* I also check INSTALL directory, build/configure.html, it didn't
* mention locale
*
*and please check the following test program
*-
*
this time it compile well (no error)
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 23:18 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 29 June 2011 23:10, eric wrote:
test1.cpp:7:67: error: operator '' has no right operand
That's because gmail wrapped these lines:
#if (__GLIBC__ 2 || (__GLIBC__ == 2 __GLIBC_MINOR__ = 3))
!defined(__UCLIBC__)
Try putting a \ character at the end of the first line, after the
Please make that change and try again. This should tell us if your
glibc doesn't have locale support, it's the test that libstdc++ uses
to enable clocale=gnu
test1.cpp:10:2: error: #error bad glibc
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 21:51 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
#define _GNU_SOURCE 1
#include string.h
#include locale.h
#include features.h
#if (__GLIBC__ 2 || (__GLIBC__ == 2 __GLIBC_MINOR__ = 3))
!defined(__UCLIBC__)
#else
#error bad glibc
#endif
int
main ()
{
char s[128];
__locale_t loc;
strxfrm_l(s, C, 5, loc);
strerror_l(5, loc);
return 0;
}
*--
* so is that very sure my locale problem
like to access source code
Dear Ubuntu linux developer:
I read from launchpad.net
about getting source code of unbuntu as
---
Alpo Turunen said on 2008-04-25: #2
If you need to get source codes of single package in ubuntu you can use
the command
'apt-get source packagename'
You must have source repositories enabled in software sources.
--
would you please tell me what is
(source repositories enabled in software sources)?
command plz.
I install from 10.04, now I upgrade kernel to 2.6.35-25(by apt-get
install linux-image-x.x.x-xx)
so
should I do
apt-get source 2.6.35-25-generic
?
and
I have a piece code about locale/unicode (and output it to file by g++'s
outfile widestring endl;)
which is not work on my system, but worked on debian/gcc/g++ system,
confirmed by someone in gcc-help mailing list.
#include iostream
#include fstream
#include string
//#include cstring
using namespace std;
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
wstring ws2 = LEuro: \x20ac;
wofstream out(unicode.txt);
if(not out.good())
cerr Error opening output file endl;
//const char *name = el_GR.utf8;
const char *name = en_US.utf8;
if(argc == 2)
name = argv[1];
cout trying to access locale name endl;
locale loc;
try{
loc = locale(name);
cout Generated locale loc.name() endl;
}catch( exception e){
cerr Couldn't generate locale name : e.what()
endl;
}
out.imbue(loc);
if(not out.good())
cerr Error when setting the locale endl;
out ws2 endl;
if(not out.good())
cerr Error when writing to file endl;
}
trying to access locale en_US.utf8
Couldn't generate locale en_US.utf8: locale::facet::_S_create_c_locale
name not valid
Error when writing to file
plz help on above too
thanks a lot in advance.
Eric
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: US website theme RFC request for screenshots
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Jorge G. Mare jorge.g.m...@gmail.comwrote: Howdy, On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Scott Lavender scottalaven...@gmail.com wrote: This is amazing. I am very impressed with the improvement. Glad you like it. I am more and more satisified with the looks and overall theme and colors. The slideshow navigation is still a bit weird, though. but I will fix it. I really look forward to building the content for this :) I would like to do more work on the theme before putting it online on an staging URL. Hopefully next weekend or the week after that. Cheers, Jorge -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel Hey Jorge, I just had some time to sit down and review this thread - took a look at the screen shots too - and my first reactions were quite impressed. I'm not so sold on having the old blurry lights image in the header, but upon looking at more screenshots it started to fade into the background. A few nitpicky items do jump to mind: 1) The admin link should not be anywhere on the site. All the people who have access to the admin of the site, know how to get there without the clickable link. This just encourages attempted security intrusions. 2) Is there a usecase for a user profile page? i.e. who will have authority to create content on the site? 3) Can we see a few screenshots outside of the admin login (i.e. a new blog post or story without the edit links above)? And one not-so nitpicky thing that could be a major thorn for us eventually; the twitter feed - which is a great idea (I'm fine with just grabbing any #ubuntustudio hashtag post) - inherently relies on a new drupal module being loaded to the site. Any new drupal module will need to undergo a full scrutiny by Cannonical's web security team before their admins okay its upload. This means we need to decide upon which modules we'll need for this web update/revamp sooner rather than later and get that process underway. Nice work so far. It does look like I'm going to have a free day every two weeks or so (starting in about a month) to chime in more than I have been and help with the implementation work. Keep up the nice tweaks. - Eric Hedekar -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Ubuntu Studio 11.10 UI discussion. GNOME3, Unity, XFCE and Studio users workflow.
I for one, have spent the past ten years using the Gnome interface and feel very comfortable in it. So much so that I anticipate UI annoyances to drive me away from Ubuntu if they stick with Ubiquity. Sorry if that's a rant/uncompromising attitude, I just wanted to share with the group my honest and heartfelt feelings on the subject (and yes I have been giving Ubiquity a steady test run over the last year or so). XFCE does not seem like it has anything to offer other than old/reliable code. It's not even that much lighter than Gnome from what I understand last time I looked into it. - Eric Hedekar On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Tim Pitman tapitma...@gmail.com wrote: Here's another vote for XFCE On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:05 PM, ailo ailo...@gmail.com wrote: On 04/11/2011 07:26 PM, ailo wrote: To test Gnome3 with Ubuntu ScottL tipped us about this one: http://ugr.teampr0xy.net/ This didn't work for me. I'm moving on to Fedora Alpha release and will give that a testrun with some multimedia programs instead. -- ailo -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: monthly meetings
I know I've been sporadically involved as of late, but seeing as I've made the commitment to help with the web revamp I should mention that I cannot attend at this time due to work. Please don't worry about this as I'll try to both read up on the minutes when I have time and keep in touch with others involved in the web revamp. Feel free to also discuss this subject without my presence. Hope all is well with everyone. - Eric Hedekar On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Mike Holstein mikeh...@gmail.com wrote: regular monthly meetings the first sunday of the month starting this sunday, march 6th... the time is 10am eastern standard time... PLEASE LET ME KNOW if you have trouble finding out what time this is in your local time zone... eastern standard time is US/new york.. for example: 10:00:00 a.m. Sunday March 6, 2011 in America/New_York converts to 03:00:00 p.m. Sunday March 6, 2011 in GMT http://www.timezoneconverter.com/ might be helpful... ...also, if there needs to be a special meeting set up for a specific purpose, such as meeting with the website team, and this time is bad for key members, additional meetings can and should be added anytime for this purpose... thanks -- MH http://opensourcemusician.libsyn.com/ http://wnclug.ourproject.org/ -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Website
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Brian David beej...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 2:42 AM, Brian David beej...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, I am experienced with creating themes with Drupal. I would say that the Impact theme needs a bit of touching up, but it's pretty close to complete. What I really would like to know is exactly how this gets done. Well, I'll go ahead and start building the Drupal theme to get things started. It'll take a little while to get that done. In the meantime, Eric, let me know what things you would like to discuss in detail about the theme. -- -Brian David At this point I've taken this discussion off-list for primarily security purposes. If anyone wants to follow the discussion or be updated on progress, let Brian, Scott, or I know and we will update accordingly. -Eric -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Website
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Brian David beej...@gmail.com wrote: Natty is not too far off, and it's been a while since there was any updates on what is going on with the website. I believe there was a meeting over a month ago about this subject, but no minutes were sent out. So, I was wondering if we could get an update on the current state of the website re-design? -- -Brian David Hey Brian, You and I need to have a brief chat (maybe we should CC Scott L in the process) about the current state of the Impact theme. Is it ready to be implemented into a full Drupal theme? Do you have any experience creating a Drupal theme? As the artistic designer of the Impact theme are there any final touches that you think need to be made to it? etc... I have put myself forward as the guy who will work on a major portion of the back end for this overhaul, but I have extremely limited time and have been letting this slide too far. I don't want to let it slide much further. Though natty has no bearing on our site's progress (it'll be ready when it's ready). Soon source files of images, fonts, colours, etc... all need to be hammered down to exact specs. -Eric -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: IRC meeting
Let's just keep the original time for the meeting. A co-worker asked to trade shifts this week anyway so it all works out in the end. -Eric On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Mike Holstein mikeh...@gmail.com wrote: hey eric, i feel like all of those options are fine... i think 24 hours later would be better than an hour earlier... i also feel like 30 minutes for the meeting length would be a good goal... i'll leave it up to you, if you want to move it, just send an email with a topic like *new irc meeting time* or something like that... lets make it so you can attend... if you prefer, i can do the mailing if we need to change the time, let me know... thanks.. On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Eric Hedekar aftertheb...@gmail.comwrote: On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Mike Holstein mikeh...@gmail.comwrote: there will be a website planning meeting in #ubuntustudio-devel on the freenode network Wednesday, December 1st @ 01:00:00 UTC. let me know ASAP if there is a more convenient time. thanks freenode webchat link to the IRC channelhttp://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=ubuntustudio-develuio=d4 -- MH http://www.myspace.com/mikeholstein http://opensourcemusician.libsyn.com/ -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel I'd love to attend this meeting but I'll be leaving for work half an hour after the meeting starts (not ideal). Could we bump the time up an hour earlier, or maybe 24 hours later? I have quite a bit of info about the current state of things and would love to help move the site forward. Thanks -Eric Hedekar -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel -- MH http://www.myspace.com/mikeholstein http://opensourcemusician.libsyn.com/ -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: IRC meeting
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Mike Holstein mikeh...@gmail.com wrote: there will be a website planning meeting in #ubuntustudio-devel on the freenode network Wednesday, December 1st @ 01:00:00 UTC. let me know ASAP if there is a more convenient time. thanks freenode webchat link to the IRC channelhttp://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=ubuntustudio-develuio=d4 -- MH http://www.myspace.com/mikeholstein http://opensourcemusician.libsyn.com/ -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel I'd love to attend this meeting but I'll be leaving for work half an hour after the meeting starts (not ideal). Could we bump the time up an hour earlier, or maybe 24 hours later? I have quite a bit of info about the current state of things and would love to help move the site forward. Thanks -Eric Hedekar -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Made With UbuntuStudio Logos
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Scott Lavender scottalaven...@gmail.comwrote: On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:05 PM, scottalaven...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 29, 2010 12:29pm, G M Slater precipitous.me...@cox.net wrote: Fellow UbuntuStudio users: Is there an official Made With UbuntuStudio logo? My latest album was recorded almost entirely using it, and I would like to be able to advertise that fact. It seems like a great way to draw more deserved attention to an incredible OS. In case anyone is interested, the music (dark ambient) is freely available at http://soundcloud.com/occurrences-in-rain If there is not an official logo, is there any particular graphic other enthusiasts are using? This is a subject that was brought up on this list back in June and a few nice (in my opinion) examples were created. Here's the link to the original poster's e-mail (including links to download all the creations): https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-devel/2010-June/002401.html -Eric Hedekar -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Dependency problem between ubuntustudio-font-meta and ttf-symbol-replacement-wine1.3
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Takashi Sakamoto o-taka...@sakamocchi.jpwrote: Hi, I utilize wine1.3 from Wine Team's PPA and have a dependency problembetween ubuntustudio-font-meta and ttf-symbol-replacement. In detail, please read my post to ubuntu-wine-team. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine/+question/132189 Of cource I'm sure that it's a user's own risk to use some packages from PPA. But the latest wine package is very useable with some windows binary of VST plugins. I daily use FeSTige for these plugins and it works fine with Wine1.3. So can we modify next ubuntustudio-font-meta package's dependency for both of ttf-symbol-replacement and ttf-symbol-replacement-wine1.X? This may avoid making users confused. Regards Takashi Sakamoto o-taka...@sakamocchi.jp Hi Takashi, Uninstalling ttf-symbol-replacement will NOT remove all of the other fonts in the font meta, nor will it remove the other packages in the graphics meta, it will merely remove the empty meta packages themselves. It is safe to replace this at will. Because ttf-symbol-replacement-wine1.X is not in ubuntu's repositories but rather in a non-Ubuntu-Studio related PPA I personally don't agree with the requested change to the font-meta. We should not be listing non-repository packages in our metas unless the Ubuntu Studio team has a direct connection to them. This is obviously just my opinion, but because the conflict is a harmless one anyways, I don't think there is much motivation to change the way things are currently. Sorry if this causes unnessecary stress or confusion. -Eric Hedekar -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Wrong information of release note for 10.10
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Takashi Sakamoto o-taka...@sakamocchi.jpwrote: Hi, I translated Maverick's release note for Japanese users. I've already put my text on Ubuntu Japanese Community Wiki. https://wiki.ubuntulinux.jp/UbuntuStudioTips/ReleaseNotes Then I have some questions. 1. kernel flavour According to Alessio's message, we cannot use -lowlatency and -realtime for Maverick and I found there are no kernel packages for Maverick in his PPA. https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-devel/2010-October/002695.html 2. Audio group I think MusE needs for users to join in audio group. In my machine, I can't start MusE if I'm not in audio group. 3. lv2 packages with question mark We can download and install both lv2vocoder and lv2-c++-tools. So there is no need with question mark. In my text, I added some notes in each parts. I want the administrator to check these items and make appropriate modification. Regards Takashi Sakamoto o-taka...@sakamocchi.jp -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel Points 1 and 3 have been updated on the ubuntustudio.org website, I'll wait for further clarification from others regarding point 2 before changing that warning. I seem to recall a lengthy discussion on that subject in the mailing list. I was merely copying text from the wiki's working release notes and not proof-reading as much as I should have been (hence the question marks remaining), sorry for the mistake. -Eric Hedekar -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Who's still maintaining libusb-0.1?
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Martin Pitt mp...@debian.org wrote: Hello Eric, Eric Miao [2010-05-31 18:09 +0800]: Sorry I brought this topic to such a massive audience. But unfortunately upower seems to be still linked with libusb-0.1, and thus bug 427805 and numerous other duplicates are affecting many users. (http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427805) For the record, upower git head is ported to the newer libusb1. Good to know that. Debugged this and came up with a simple fix (a most common error), yet I don't know where to send except as attachment on LP. But this was already SRUed into Lucid, so it shouldn't be a problem any more? No, it's no more a problem. Switching to the new libusb1 is the definitely the right way to go. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Who's still maintaining libusb-0.1?
Hi All, Sorry I brought this topic to such a massive audience. But unfortunately upower seems to be still linked with libusb-0.1, and thus bug 427805 and numerous other duplicates are affecting many users. (http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427805) This happens intermittently and was ignored by me previously until several hours ago I realized there are so many users out there affected by this, mostly Mac users including me, and it looks Mac is vulnerable to this possibly because of the difference in the USB devices' descriptors. Debugged this and came up with a simple fix (a most common error), yet I don't know where to send except as attachment on LP. And we were also talking about deprecating libusb-0.1 in -M, yet this seems to be still useful for Lucid users at this moment. Patch attached. - eric revno: 378 committer: Eric Miao ycm...@macbook-lucid branch nick: libusb timestamp: Mon 2010-05-31 16:34:43 +0800 message: Initialized the allocated interface-altsetting to zero This prevents incorrect references to uninitialized fields within interface-altsetting[], which is the case for Bug 427805 - usb_find_devices() crashed with SIGSEGV in free() where an uninitialized '-extra' pointer is being free()'ed in usb_destroy_configuration() called by usb_find_devices(). diff: === modified file 'descriptors.c' --- descriptors.c 2006-02-18 00:28:19 + +++ descriptors.c 2010-05-31 08:34:43 + @@ -176,6 +176,9 @@ return -1; } +memset(interface-altsetting, 0, sizeof(struct usb_interface_descriptor) * + (interface-num_altsetting + 1)); + ifp = interface-altsetting + interface-num_altsetting; interface-num_altsetting++; -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: Ubuntu Studio Forum at Ubuntu Forums
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Jussi Schultink juss...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 8:37 PM, scottalaven...@gmail.com wrote: All, In an effort to create a better branding for Ubuntu Studio, which hopefully will also foster additional community involvement, we will be renaming the current forum at Ubuntu Forums that caters to Ubuntu Studio. The Ubuntu Forums admin have asked that we provide a new name and description. Currently, the name of the forum we use is Multimedia Production and its description is Discussions about Ubuntu Studio and other multimedia production applications. The name is used on the Ubuntu Forums home page under the Main Support Categories and the name and description can be viewed in the second gray box from the top on the Multimedia Production forum. See below for links: Ubuntu Forums main page - http://ubuntuforums.org/ Multimedia Production page - http://ubuntuforums.org/forumdisplay.php?f=335 My suggestion would be to use Ubuntu Studio as the forum name and use the current description as noted above. Your input and suggestions are greatly encouraged and appreciated. I agree here, either this or Ubuntu Studio Support. If you look at the other main support categories, there ones with just the name, Ubuntu One Ubuntu Moblin Remix etc and then others with Support tagged on: System76 Support Dell Ubuntu Support. As we seem to identify more with the former group, I would +1 Scotts idea of just Ubuntu Studio Jussi. I agree with everyone as well. Ubuntu Studio would be a great name change. - Eric Hedekar -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Ubuntu Studio Forum at Ubuntu Forums
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Fritz Meissner meissner.fr...@gmail.comwrote: On 5 March 2010 23:37, Louie Queral louiethecu...@gmail.com wrote: Why don't we separate it into two subforums, development and general discussion. That way the developers and the users can be free to discuss related subjects within their own space. -Luis I feel that the guiding principle is that information should be kept together in one place until the volume makes it necessary to split it. Start with one forum, we can always split it later when the traffic builds up. If the traffic is light, then it does no harm if users and devs are all fully aware of what is going on, in fact it's ideal. I'm assuming that the present Multimedia Video and Multimedia Production forums will stay, as they field a lot of hardware questions which would totally swamp the Studio forum if they were combined with it. Fritz I agree with your take on not splitting the forum (I think this would be a bigger bureaucratic headache too), however from my understanding of Scott's original proposal, Multimedia Video is not a part of this discussion and Multimedia Production is proposed to be changed to Ubuntu Studio. The two names are very similar and I've seen many posts in the wrong categories because of this fact (another great argument to change the name of Multimedia Production). -Eric Hedekar -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Jack in Ubuntu Studio
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:13 AM, Samuel Mehrbrodt s.mehrbr...@googlemail.com wrote: Thanks for your quick response. So will lucid have PulseAudio with Jack support? Nobody knows. But we're working toward that goal. -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: IRC anyone?
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Scott Lavender scottalaven...@gmail.comwrote: On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Louie Queral louiethecu...@gmail.comwrote: me too On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Luke Yelavich them...@ubuntu.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:28:49AM PST, Eric Hedekar wrote: On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Luke Yelavich them...@ubuntu.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 09:59:31AM PST, Eric Hedekar wrote: I know I can't make the usual time of 19:00UTC on the second sunday of the month (i.e. I'm busy on Feb 14th). Would we be able to do 19:00UTC this Friday or Saturday (Feb 5th or 6th)? That would give us enough time to act on any last items before feature freeze. I can't do this weekend, either Friday or Saturday. Friday I will be at lunch since the platform sprint is on this week, and Saturday, I'l be traveling. Luke Hmm, having a meeting during the platform sprint doesn't sound like a wise idea (it's likely others that would want to attend wouldn't be able to. Can we do 19:00UTC on Wednesday Feb 10th? I can do that. uke -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel good for me :) wiki uphttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Meetings/2010Feb10 Well it just dawned on me that I didn't check the fridge before suggesting this date/time and it looks like the Edubuntu team has a meeting at the same time in #ubuntu-meeting. We can either choose a different time or hold the meeting in #ubuntustudio-devel I think holding it in #ubuntustudio-devel would be a better decision. -Eric Hedekar -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: IRC anyone?
I know I can't make the usual time of 19:00UTC on the second sunday of the month (i.e. I'm busy on Feb 14th). Would we be able to do 19:00UTC this Friday or Saturday (Feb 5th or 6th)? That would give us enough time to act on any last items before feature freeze. - Eric Hedekar On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 5:19 AM, Jussi Schultink juss...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Scott Lavender scottalaven...@gmail.comwrote: On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Louie Queral louiethecu...@gmail.comwrote: When should we have our next meeting on IRC? -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel The next regularly meeting should be February 14th I believe. I'm guessing most people would rather wait until then. I'm good with whatever the group feels appropriate. Id be suprised if anyone comes, given what that day is in most countries... Jussi ScottL -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Ubuntu Studio artwork question
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Jussi Schultink juss...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:38 AM, Louie Queral louiethecu...@gmail.comwrote: Honestly, I feel like the addition of an official Ubuntu Studio forum (preferably separate from the messiness of the ubuntu forums) would be the most efficient way to encourage involvement. The wiki's are great ways to display user contributed artwork and such, but in my opinion, it acts as more of a gallery rather than a station for discussion and further development. Forums are quick to set up, free, and easy to maintain. I can see our forum separated into different categories such as Development, Bugs, Troubleshooting etc. However, in regards to art, the forum should be divided into several subforums: -Logo Design -Theme/Icon Design -Website Design/Improvements Moderators will also stick threads that they feel are becoming popular, or increasingly productive. This kind of structure will allow artists to not only upload their work quickly and effectively, but also pass their work through a medium that offers a community of critics. Forgive me if I sound intrusive, but I envision the future of Ubuntu Studio as being a well-respected linux distro focused on multimedia creation. A distro that offers artists, musicians, animators, and directors the chance to create their work on an open-source platform that is stable, efficient, graphically appealing, and simple. We really have a chance here to continue developing something magnificent, and in order to do so, we need a more tightly knit community. I agree forums are all that, but as an officially recognised derivative of Ubuntu, we need to make use of officially sanctioned areas. this isnt to say we cannot have our own, but that if possible, we should work with existing facilities. Second, by utilising the part of Ubuntu forums we have been given, we gain access to a lot more viewers, and thus a lot more possible contributors. If a decision is made that we need more room in the forums, or a different structure, I am well familiar with the members of the forums council and can do the necessary liason work to make it happen. If you have time, please join our IRC channel and feel free to have a chat to us in realtime about it there. Jussi, I personally greatly agree with your take on forums. Maintaining our own seems silly at best - we would also need to deal with errors of general ubuntu, beginners, etc... in our own forum and there are some excellent users within the Multimedia Production section. I do think that we could use a different category/organization on ubuntuforums.org as Multimedia Production has very little branding of our project. In my mind, the question is: What forum sections should we ask for? My personal opinion on that question is that Ubuntu Studio should become a section similar to the Development and Programming section. Within that, there should be a sections on Audio, Video, Graphic Design, and Gallery. It would be great if we could integrate the look of our forum sections with our website, but I'm not sure how practical that is. -Eric Hedekar -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Jack inclusion in Main
Hey Everyone, Just curious what the status of the Jack main inclusion report is? I see there has been some work put in by Scott at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MainInclusionReportJACK but I'm curious if that's ready to create the launchpad bug? - Eric Hedekar -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Reminder: Monthly Ubuntu Studio Development Team Meeting
Hi Everyone, Hope you all had a wonderful holiday. This is a reminder that in 11 days (Jan 10th) we have our next monthly Ubuntu Studio development team meeting. As always, it will take place in #ubuntu-meeting on irc.freenode.net at 7:00pm (19:00) UTC and the agenda can be read/edited/defaced at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Meetings/2010Jan10 We encourage all those interested in Ubuntu Studio's growth to attend (even just to passively read). For further meeting info take a look at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Meetings Thanks for your time, and have a happy new year! - Eric Hedekar -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Dec13 Developer Meeting Reminder
This is just a friendly reminder that the monthly (non-mandatory) Ubuntu Studio Developer meeting is five days away. It will be held at 19:00 UTC on Sunday Dec 13th in #ubuntu-meeting on irc.freenode.net and will follow the agenda at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Meetings/2009Dec13 For those not already planning to attend, you may want to sit in and listen, or check https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Meetings/ for minutes and plans for the next (and previous) meetings. Anyone with any interest in helping the development of Ubuntu Studio is encouraged to attend, and bookmark https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Meetings/ Thanks. - Eric Hedekar -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: List of Ubuntu Studio packages for making a live DVD ?
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 9:47 AM, laurent.bellegarde laurent.bellega...@free.fr wrote: Hi all. With another team, lprod.org team have created a live DVD of Ubuntu Studio Karmic 32 bits (we can create also a 64 bits example). I've tested it this morning on a laptop with only windows XP pro on the hard disk. It's working perfectly. It could be nice to have this iso available for everyone, but we have a trouble. The guy who has created the live DVD has done a great job, but has introduced severals packages which are very important for video editing but cause some trouble of licence, as ffmpeg, mencoder, mplayer. So this DVD is very powerfull because you can edit video in live which is very impressive, but illegal in severals countries. I'm gonna complete my tests, ardour is also compiled with VST support, and many non free improvement are live available. So where can i found the complete official list of ALL the packages free included in the Ubuntu Studio karmic official DVD install disk to compare to our beta disk, to create a new one as the official one but live, without all forbidden packages to allow everyone to download it ? Is it allowed to create it ? If not, we can create a lprod.org one, based only on free software included in Ubuntu Studio, in live and downloadable. Thank's for answers. Laurent, lprod.org -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list ubuntu-studio-us...@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users Hi Laurent, This is wonderful news, this is a feature request that we get on a regular basis from our users but the dev team is not experienced in the creation of LiveDVDs. It'd be great if this effort could be moved into the Ubuntu Studio development process so that future releases have live capabilities. I'm CCing the dev list on this and I hope that the discussion continues there. Please consider joining that list to facilitate the discussion there. To answer your question regarding packages, the full list of packages (including dependencies) can be seen at http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=defaultsection=allarch=anysearchon=nameskeywords=ubuntustudio - Eric Hedekar -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Scheduling the next monthly meeting time
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Luke Yelavich them...@ubuntu.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:08:21AM EST, Eric Hedekar wrote: Hey everyone, So last month we had started to discuss a change to the monthly meeting time. After further discussions on IRC I think Sundays at 7pm (19:00) UTC would likely be a good time for most. Does anyone have a major conflict with this? Luke I realize this is 6am on monday for you, is that too early? We were running this on the second monday of every month, so should we continue on the second sunday of every month now? That would place the next meeting on December 13th at 7pm UTC. Luke are you back from your vacation by then? Please voice your opinions on this. I'll be back by then, and I am happy to do that time once every 2 weeks. Just to clarify, it'd be the second sunday of every month, so once every 4 weeks (roughly). -Eric -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Replace Creox with Rakarrack?
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Scott Lavender scottalaven...@gmail.comwrote: I would like to suggest we replace Creox effects processor with Rakarrack for Lucid. Creox [1] does not appear to be updated or maintained as the version (0.2.2rc2) that is currently in Ubuntu Studio [2] (and Debian [3]) was released in 2003. Rakarrack [4], in contrast, released three new versions last year [5] and even has a developers blog [6] that shows activity for this year. Although Rakarrack isn't currently in the Ubuntu repositories, Debian shows packaging for Rakarrack for both Sid and Squeeze [6] so hopefully we can sync easily enough. Dave Phillips even reviewed it in one of his Linux Journal articles [7]. The next prudent steps would be to mail the Ubuntu Studio users mail list, post at Ubuntu Forums and even mail to developer to ask if updates can be expected. If no one violently objects to persuing Rakarrack I will take previously outlined steps. Scott [1] http://zyzstar.kosoru.com/?creox [2] http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=creox [3] http://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=nameskeywords=creox [4] http://rakarrack.sourceforge.net/ [5] http://sourceforge.net/projects/rakarrack/files/ [6] http://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=nameskeywords=rakarrack [7] http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/rakarrack-guitar-fx-linux -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel +1 for me. I think the only reason why we haven't shipped rackarrack was the lack of package. If it's synced from debian, then all is good. -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Ubuntu Studio Testers team on Launchpad
Hi all, This is an announcement about a new community team dedicated to testing Ubuntu Studio. We'd love your participation in this community. It's clear that the testing portion of our development cycle needs more manpower, and it's also one of the areas that has a low barrier for entry for members. It's quite easy to test Ubuntu Studio provided you're comfortable running the development release and reporting bugs. This community will hopefully bring the people currently testing Ubuntu Studio together, encourage more people to join and test Ubuntu Studio, and as a result, make Ubuntu Studio rock solid. We really do need your help with this. As a start for this community, we've created a Launchpad team at https://launchpad.net/~ubuntustudio-testers complete with a mailing list at ubuntustudio-test...@lists.launchpad.net for the team to discuss anything and everything releated to testing Ubuntu Studio. Please join this launchpad team and subscribe yourself to the mailing list. As the community grows we will surely evolve to have more communication channels, but for now this is a great start. If you're confident enough to run the development release of Ubuntu Studio and report bugs you find, please sign up for this launchpad team. Thanks for your time. - Eric Hedekar https://launchpad.net/~ubuntustudio-testers -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Testing Team
Cory suggested on IRC that I write a quick proposal on this and run it by the list, so here goes (please offer any opinion you may have on the matter): I'd like to create an Ubuntu Studio Testers team on Launchpad. The purpose of this team would be to thoroughly test the development version of Ubuntu Studio. This team would help to solve a number of current testing issues/problems, they include but are not limited to: - No/small testing community. We currently only have a user and development community structure. This team would create belonging amongst testers which would likely result in more active testing (I've received a handful of direct e-mails re:testing Ubuntu Studio). People would have to actively remove themselves from the testing group to stop receiving notifications e-mails, rather than just forgetting about their commitment. - No formal communication channel for testers. Currently testing results are published to the entire ubuntu studio development or users mailing list (inconsistent behavior) - there's no formal policy for how to report test results (other than ISO test results). This team would include a launchpad mailing list that would allow for questions on testing, testing coordination, discussion of test results, and subscription to the ISO build notifier, all without overburdening either the users or dev mailing lists. This would also allow for a larger number of testing requests without annoying our user base. - Lack of organized testing. We currently only have organized ISO testing. This team would be in charge of building a suite of tests for Ubuntu Studio and ensuring that they are met across releases, this includes notifying the developers should the tests fail. I would imagine this team could be used to follow important bugs, create testing scripts, and build wiki documentation on testing the software shipped with Ubuntu Studio. I'd be quite willing to create and lead this team, as well as announce it's creation on the ubuntu studio mailing lists, qa mailing list, and bugsquad mailing list. Essentially I'd like to create a means for Ubuntu Studio testers to work together more effectively. - Eric Hedekar ___ Vice President of Vancouver Pro Musica Society http://www.vancouverpromusica.ca Ubuntu Studio Developer http://www.ubuntustudio.org Web Designer Audio Artist http://www.erichedekar.com -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Lucid Lynx - Why it will rock.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Cory K. coryis...@gmail.com wrote: Because we will command it to be so. :) All kidding aside, I'm considering throwing my hat back in the ring for this next cycle. My schedule will keep me more on Luke's time online but that's just how it is. Any objections? So. What do we wanna tackle? - JACK in main. - New art (James (dashua) and I will tackle this) - LOTS of bug fixin'. *-controls and *-settings bugs are drivin' me nuts. Looks like *-controls needs love as well. Now I have a proposal for the site I wanted to run by you guys 1st before I put it on the list. :) I'm thinking /if/ we can't do a complete site overhaul we point our domains to the wiki. The site has just been too much of a hassle without someone dedicated to maintain it. Y/N? Since Lucid is an LTS I think it's important we get a plan and put it into action as soon as we can. I have started a page to has out things: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/LucidPlanning -Cory K. \m/ I had totally forgotten about this website when I started moving the Karmic Task List ( https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/KarmicTaskList ) to a Lucid page: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/LucidTaskList Luckily, I remembered (well firefox remembered it for me) and I've since incorporated it into the Lucid Task List page. Is it okay to erase LucidPlanning and put a re-direct to the LucidTaskList page? -Eric -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: ISOs aren't mirrored
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:05 AM, T.P.J.Ferrere t.p.j.ferr...@open.ac.ukwrote: Hi all, Is there any specific reason why some Ubuntu distributions are mirrored while Studio isn’t? In all Ubuntu mirror sites there is a link to download Ubuntu Studio, unfortunately it doesn’t point to a local page on the mirror site but to http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntustudio/releases/9.10/releasewhich is obviously not accessible. Let me know what I can do next to help. Cheers, Thomas I have just forwarded this e-mail along with a request for mirrors to the ubuntu-development mailing list. It's really out of our hands and up to the admins of the mirrors, but hopefully people will understand. On a side note, you may want to just use the torrents for now as they will likely be faster than direct cdimage.ubuntu.com downloads while that server is as slammed as it is. Torrents can be found at http://torrent.ubuntu.com:6969/ -Eric Hedekar -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Ubuntu Studio mirrors required
-- Forwarded message -- From: T.P.J.Ferrere t.p.j.ferr...@open.ac.uk Date: Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:05 AM Subject: ISOs aren't mirrored To: ubuntu-studio-de...@lists.ubuntu.com ubuntu-studio-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Hi all, Is there any specific reason why some Ubuntu distributions are mirrored while Studio isn’t? In all Ubuntu mirror sites there is a link to download Ubuntu Studio, unfortunately it doesn’t point to a local page on the mirror site but to http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntustudio/releases/9.10/releasewhich is obviously not accessible. Let me know what I can do next to help. Cheers, Thomas Hi, I just received this e-mail on the Ubuntu Studio mailing list, and thought I'd pass it on to a wider audience in hopes of finding any admins of Ubuntu mirrors that would be willing to also host the Ubuntu Studio images. As we all know cdimage.ubuntu.com is slammed (I'll refrain myself from vulgarities in describing how slammed it is) and unfortunately that is the only place (other than the torrents) where the Ubuntu Studio Karmic ISO is hosted. So this is a plea to anyone with a mirror to consider the option of hosting Ubuntu Studio images. It is a very popular (and official) derivative, currently ranked 33 on distrowatch's page hit ranking (xubuntu is 31) and it would be great to have the ISO directly accessible via web browser - cdimage.ubuntu.com exists, but it takes forever to load if lucky enough to have it load right now. Thanks for your time. -Eric Hedekar -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Ubuntu Studio 9.10 Karmic Koala
Ubuntu Studio is a multimedia editing/creation flavor of Ubuntu, built for the GNU/Linux audio, video, and graphics enthusiast or professional. http://www.ubuntustudio.org The Ubuntu Studio team is proud to announce its sixth release: Ubuntu Studio 9.10 Karmic Koala. With this release, which you can download in a 1.4GB DVD, Ubuntu Studio offers a pre-made selection of packages, targeted at audio producers, video producers and graphic designers. Ubuntu Studio greatly simplifies the Linux-based multimedia workstation. Downloads of the install DVD are available here: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntustudio/releases/9.10/release For Ubuntu Studio 9.10 we have continued to grow our feature set, update packages, and fix critical bugs to better the Ubuntu Studio user experience. We are happy to announce that the real time kernel will be an official upstream release patch. It will be installed by default if the audio task is selected. We have tested it heavily and are very happy with it's performance in audio environments. Features/Improvements: * Official upstream RT kernel release (i.e. it's very stable) * Font meta package added to the graphics meta, which installs literally hundreds of free fonts * Xwax (http://xwax.co.uk) and a2jmidid (http://home.gna.org/a2jmidid/) packaged and added to the audio meta-package * Xjadeo (http://xjadeo.sourceforge.net/) added to the video meta * Network tools like NetworkManager and Pidgin will be available on the DVD disc repository but not installed by default * Firewire libraries are now upgraded to 2.0 * MANY newer versions of applications (Ardour, Gimp, Blender, Inkscape, Audacity, Kino, Scribus, Denemo, Hugin, etc...) for exact versions please see: http://packages.ubuntu.com See the Ubuntu release notes for other non Ubuntu Studio specific changes. As our wiki page at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio states, our aim is to make it more accessible for new users to get into the tools that GNU/Linux has to offer for multimedia creation and production. We also want to spotlight what's out there, and show users tools they might not know to exist. Thanks to all who helped in Ubuntu Studio 9.10's creation! -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Nov. Meeting Date/Time
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Cory K. coryis...@gmail.com wrote: On 10/29/2009 11:56 AM, Scott Lavender wrote: On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Eric Hedekaraftertheb...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Luis de Bethencourtlui...@ubuntu.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:26 PM,scottalaven...@gmail.com wrote: The upcoming meeting is schedule for 1:00 a.m. Monday for me, which is a work day. Would it be possible to move it to the previous day so that at least it's 1:00 am between Saturday and Sunday? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Meetings/2009Nov9 I'm in a business trip to Denver Sunday morning. So I won't be able to make the meeting either way. So people now my availability my trave is: November 1st - November 8th : Denver, Colorado November 8th - November 12th : San Francisco, California I will be responding to emails and dropping by IRC during office hours, have the time zones in mind. Luis Well I'm in favor of keeping the meeting time as was scheduled. It is a non-mandatory meeting, though I suspect many Lucid ideas will be acted on/planned for there. The idea of having rotating 7am UTC / 7pm UTC times is that no time will suit everyone and hopefully at least one of those will suit most people. I'm happy to revisit this schedule, but I think we should keep it on a pre-defined schedule for purposes of publicity and easy organization. This is just my opinion, if enough others need it moved, there's nothing stopping things. ScottL, maybe you could review the minutes as soon as possible and chime in on IRC, or also add your info to an e-mail just prior to the meeting. Luis, you are aware the meeting is on Nov 9th at 7am UTC (that's 12am San Franciso time), not this coming Monday but rather 12 days from now. Hopefully you'll be settled in your hotel room and able to be up late then. -Eric -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel First, my apologies because I originally only responded to Eric. I am replying again, but this time to the list, but again via Gmail. I hope it nests the messages correctly. I'm sorry that I have not been clear about this. I would think it would be advantageous to revisit the meeting schedule. I think moving the meetings ahead one day to Sunday would make them significantly more accessible to those in the U.S. Therefore, 1:00am Sunday morning would be better than 1:00am Monday morning and 1:00pm Sunday afternoon would be better than 1:00pm Monday afternoon for those that work in the US. I'll do a 1A.M. Sunday meeting. -Cory K. Now that I check this against my schedule I realize I work at both 7am UTC and 7pm UTC on Sundays so I would not be available during these proposed meeting times. I'd love to continue attending the meetings, but if I'm the only one that this doesn't work for, then don't let me stop the group. -Eric -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Nov. Meeting Date/Time
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Luis de Bethencourt lui...@ubuntu.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:26 PM, scottalaven...@gmail.com wrote: The upcoming meeting is schedule for 1:00 a.m. Monday for me, which is a work day. Would it be possible to move it to the previous day so that at least it's 1:00 am between Saturday and Sunday? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Meetings/2009Nov9 I'm in a business trip to Denver Sunday morning. So I won't be able to make the meeting either way. So people now my availability my trave is: November 1st - November 8th : Denver, Colorado November 8th - November 12th : San Francisco, California I will be responding to emails and dropping by IRC during office hours, have the time zones in mind. Luis Well I'm in favor of keeping the meeting time as was scheduled. It is a non-mandatory meeting, though I suspect many Lucid ideas will be acted on/planned for there. The idea of having rotating 7am UTC / 7pm UTC times is that no time will suit everyone and hopefully at least one of those will suit most people. I'm happy to revisit this schedule, but I think we should keep it on a pre-defined schedule for purposes of publicity and easy organization. This is just my opinion, if enough others need it moved, there's nothing stopping things. ScottL, maybe you could review the minutes as soon as possible and chime in on IRC, or also add your info to an e-mail just prior to the meeting. Luis, you are aware the meeting is on Nov 9th at 7am UTC (that's 12am San Franciso time), not this coming Monday but rather 12 days from now. Hopefully you'll be settled in your hotel room and able to be up late then. -Eric -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Karmic Koala Features?
Hey Everyone, Luis has asked me to head up writing the release notes for Karmic, so I'm trying valiantly to recall all the great new features of Ubuntu Studio this time around. Can anyone point out features that are missing from the below list: - Official upstream RT kernel release (i.e. it's very stable) - Font meta package added to the graphics meta - Xwax and a2jmidid added to the audio meta - Xjadeo added to the video meta - Network tools like NetworkManager and Pidgin will be available on the DVD disc repository but not installed by default - Firewire stack is now upgraded to 2.0 (should this be mentioned? what benefit does the end user see? I'd like to elaborate a bit) - Newer versions of many applications (Ardour, Gimp, Blender, Inkscape, Audacity, Kino, Scribus, Denemo, Hugin, etc...) What's missing? - Eric Hedekar ___ Vice President of Vancouver Pro Musica Society http://www.vancouverpromusica.ca Ubuntu Studio Developer http://www.ubuntustudio.org Web Designer Audio Artist http://www.erichedekar.com -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Lucid Lynx - Why it will rock.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Cory K. coryis...@gmail.com wrote: Because we will command it to be so. :) All kidding aside, I'm considering throwing my hat back in the ring for this next cycle. My schedule will keep me more on Luke's time online but that's just how it is. Any objections? So. What do we wanna tackle? JACK in main. New art (James (dashua) and I will tackle this) LOTS of bug fixin'. *-controls and *-settings bugs are drivin' me nuts. Looks like *-controls needs love as well. Now I have a proposal for the site I wanted to run by you guys 1st before I put it on the list. :) I'm thinking /if/ we can't do a complete site overhaul we point our domains to the wiki. The site has just been too much of a hassle without someone dedicated to maintain it. Y/N? Since Lucid is an LTS I think it's important we get a plan and put it into action as soon as we can. I have started a page to has out things: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/LucidPlanning -Cory K. \m/ -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel I'm planning on giving the website a little bit of loving very soon - I'd hate to see the wiki be our front page. Cory can you add that link to our upcoming meeting agenda https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Meetings/2009Nov9 It's great to hear you're coming back to the project. And yes, Lucid will Rock - provided there's a solid kernel. -Eric Hedekar -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Documentation Update
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Cory K. coryis...@gmail.com wrote: On 10/18/2009 06:00 PM, Scott Lavender wrote: I started making progress on the wiki documentation. I first looked at the three pages Eric mentioned on the Oct 12 meeting agenda https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Meetings/2009Oct12 . On Friday I updated the applications page on the wiki, there are still a few little things to complete. https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuStudio/Applications To also complete the update of the application lists on the wiki I will also be addressing these pages in the near future: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuStudio/Audio https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuStudio/Audio https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuStudio/Video https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuStudio/Notation I'm not fluent in all these apps but I can get update the applications listed and in some cases give the page _some_ text. Others will need to update them also. During the weekend I also looked at the Installation and GettingStarted pages that Eric mentioned. Obviously, the installation page need some work but I felt that we should probably address installing the current and LTS versions of Ubuntu Studio and also upgrading from the current and the LTS version of Ubuntu only. No point in telling people how to install/upgrade Feisty. Just my two cents. As I read the GettingStarted page I felt like this was a microcosm for the entire wiki. By this I mean it's focus is diffused and lacked overall structure. Yes, the page in a logical order, but the information about adding the -rt kernel should probably be on a upgrade from Ubuntu page. Defining JACK and how to set it up should like wise be addressed on it's own pertinent and dedicated page. What this probably means is that the wiki pages would benefit from some restructuring. Over this weekend I spent time mind mapping the wiki and hopefully by next weekend I will have mockups available on the wiki. Which leads me to my next question: Does anyone object to me making temporary new pages? For the time being it would be duplicate information (parsed out from existing pages and condensed) with some additional text/structure. We would need to be able to delete some of those pages at a later date and I don't know who has rights. If I don't get any responses to the a new wiki structure and temporary duplicate pages I will take silence as acceptance. This has been needed for some time and I welcome your effort. Non-silent +1 from me. ;) -Cory K. Non-silence from me as well. This effort of organization is LONG overdue, thank you, thank you, thank you. The Wiki really did grow without any structure or guidance. I'll try to give some time to reviewing your changes - feel free to bounce ideas off me as well if you're unsure of things. As for the Upgrade/Installation page, both Feisty and Gutsy are no longer officially supported so any materials for those anywhere on the wiki can happily be deleted. I also think the upgrade process doesn't really need to be split into release versions, it did back when Ubuntu Studio first started, but not any more, so those pages could be combined into one. -Eric -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Upcoming Ubuntu Studio Developers Meeting
Hey Everyone, I just wanted to send a reminder about our upcoming team meeting in ten days. It's non-mandatory but highly recommended. It is scheduled for October 12th at 7pm UTC n #ubuntu-meeting on freenode.net. The agenda can be found and edited at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Meetings/2009Oct12we may also want to cover some of the topics on last months meeting agenda https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Meetings/2009Sept14 as the attendance to that meeting was quite poor. Hope to see everyone there. -- - Eric Hedekar ___ Vice President of Vancouver Pro Musica Society http://www.vancouverpromusica.ca Ubuntu Studio Developer http://www.ubuntustudio.org Web Designer Audio Artist http://www.erichedekar.com -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Jack inclusion in Main
In Bug #416778 ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416778 ) Loïc Minier has requested further public discussion on the subject of Jack Audio Server http://jackaudio.org/ being included in the Main repositories. I was told this list would be the best place for that discussion. I am also CCing the ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com because the Ubuntu Studio team has been the driving force behind this inclusion request and are extremely knowledgeable in regards to JACK. Here are a couple of my thoughts on the matter as to why Jack should be included in Main. - Many bugs have been filed against various audio servers currently in Main (xine, alsa, portaudio, pulseaudio) requesting that the JACK bridge/plugin/output/etc... be turned on or compiled into the package - this is not possible without the inclusion of Jack in Main. Bugs #152487, #84900, #109659, and #360590 (this may not be a complete list, and duplicates of most of these have been filed). - The libffado drivers for firewire soundcards ( http://www.ffado.org ) are only supported by the Jack driver. This makes these common, pro, semi-pro, and hobbyist audio cards inaccessible for most applications without the previous audio server bridges/plugins/outputs to jack available. Owners of these cards must recompile major audio drivers in order to get basic Ubuntu sound. - Jack is an audio server designed specifically for professional reliable audio signals. This is not a duplicate server clogging up the audio mess, which some people believe exists in Linux, it is a specialty tool for musicians, audio engineers, and anyone using Linux for professional audio. (In-fact if anything, allowing the aforementioned bugs to get fixed would clean up a large chunk of the audio mess which some believe exists. It would at least stop a large segment of people from griping so loudly about and attempting to remove PulseAudio.) Please voice your opinion on the matter. -Eric Hedekar -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Jack inclusion in Main
In Bug #416778 ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416778 ) Loïc Minier has requested further public discussion on the subject of Jack Audio Server http://jackaudio.org/ being included in the Main repositories. I was told this list would be the best place for that discussion. I am also CCing the ubuntu-studio-de...@lists.ubuntu.com because the Ubuntu Studio team has been the driving force behind this inclusion request and are extremely knowledgeable in regards to JACK. Here are a couple of my thoughts on the matter as to why Jack should be included in Main. - Many bugs have been filed against various audio servers currently in Main (xine, alsa, portaudio, pulseaudio) requesting that the JACK bridge/plugin/output/etc... be turned on or compiled into the package - this is not possible without the inclusion of Jack in Main. Bugs #152487, #84900, #109659, and #360590 (this may not be a complete list, and duplicates of most of these have been filed). - The libffado drivers for firewire soundcards ( http://www.ffado.org ) are only supported by the Jack driver. This makes these common, pro, semi-pro, and hobbyist audio cards inaccessible for most applications without the previous audio server bridges/plugins/outputs to jack available. Owners of these cards must recompile major audio drivers in order to get basic Ubuntu sound. - Jack is an audio server designed specifically for professional reliable audio signals. This is not a duplicate server clogging up the audio mess, which some people believe exists in Linux, it is a specialty tool for musicians, audio engineers, and anyone using Linux for professional audio. (In-fact if anything, allowing the aforementioned bugs to get fixed would clean up a large chunk of the audio mess which some believe exists. It would at least stop a large segment of people from griping so loudly about and attempting to remove PulseAudio.) Please voice your opinion on the matter. -Eric Hedekar -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Fwd: Jack inclusion in Main
-- Forwarded message -- From: tto...@ttoine.net tto...@ttoine.net Date: Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:22 PM Subject: Re: Jack inclusion in Main To: Ubuntu Studio Development Technical Discussion ubuntu-studio-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Eric Hedekar a écrit : In Bug #416778 ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416778 ) Loïc Minier has requested further public discussion on the subject of Jack Audio Server http://jackaudio.org/ being included in the Main repositories. I was told this list would be the best place for that discussion. I am also CCing the ubuntu-studio-de...@lists.ubuntu.com mailto:ubuntu-studio-de...@lists.ubuntu.com because the Ubuntu Studio team has been the driving force behind this inclusion request and are extremely knowledgeable in regards to JACK. Here are a couple of my thoughts on the matter as to why Jack should be included in Main. - Many bugs have been filed against various audio servers currently in Main (xine, alsa, portaudio, pulseaudio) requesting that the JACK bridge/plugin/output/etc... be turned on or compiled into the package - this is not possible without the inclusion of Jack in Main. Bugs #152487, #84900, #109659, and #360590 (this may not be a complete list, and duplicates of most of these have been filed). - The libffado drivers for firewire soundcards ( http://www.ffado.org ) are only supported by the Jack driver. This makes these common, pro, semi-pro, and hobbyist audio cards inaccessible for most applications without the previous audio server bridges/plugins/outputs to jack available. Owners of these cards must recompile major audio drivers in order to get basic Ubuntu sound. - Jack is an audio server designed specifically for professional reliable audio signals. This is not a duplicate server clogging up the audio mess, which some people believe exists in Linux, it is a specialty tool for musicians, audio engineers, and anyone using Linux for professional audio. (In-fact if anything, allowing the aforementioned bugs to get fixed would clean up a large chunk of the audio mess which some believe exists. It would at least stop a large segment of people from griping so loudly about and attempting to remove PulseAudio.) Please voice your opinion on the matter. -Eric Hedekar I agree with Eric. Inclusion of Jack in main will solve a lot of problem with audio applications, sound servers, etc... Missing Jack in main is a great problem too for packagers. Toine -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel -- ___ http://greyrockstudio.blogspot.com -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: Ubuntu Studio Art Manager
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Kiernan Holland roftho...@gmail.comwrote: I could contribute some things, but I don't know about being a art manager.. If you could put together a package of the images of a complete package, it would give us something to play around with, and I'm sure someone could come up with some themes, but it's not clear where these bitmaps reside. Also I could arrange to make blender blend files that would manage the compositing and texturing/lighting/rendering of the elements, which is something you can do with blender. You can run blender like a blackbox, providing input and generating output, I once wrangled and animation unattended from a Makefile. I think any single theme, is a bad idea.. IF it's going to be about creativity, it should permit a wide range of themes, and these should be community created.. That means the elements should be accessible and selective by the community, as what good is a creative operating system if the elements of the interface are not being created by it's creative users. Hi Kiernan, I'm glad to see you're interested in helping. Just for your (and everyone else's) knowledge, the entire Ubuntu Studio official graphics (and everything else that makes Ubuntu Studio what it is) is located at https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntustudio-dev for everyone's perusal. Specifically you'll find the ubuntustudio-look package here too: https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntustudio-dev/ubuntustudio-look/UbuntuStudio Feel free to create a bzr branch of your own modifications to that package at anytime, then a merge can be proposed and possibly approved to get your changes into the official set. Hope that helps clarify things. - Eric Hedekar -- ___ http://greyrockstudio.blogspot.com -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Ubuntu Studio Art Manager
Hey Everyone, I just wanted to raise the subject of Art development and management within Ubuntu Studio. As many of you may know, Cory Kontros has stepped away from the project for personal reasons and he had previously been spearheading the art portion of Ubuntu Studio. It's my opinion that Cory left us with a great default art set, but if it's left to sit still, chances are our users will find it stale soon enough. That's why I'd like to put a call out for a new art manager. The ideal candidate will not be placed directly into this position, she/he will have to show they deserve it. However, they should have knowledge of theming all aspects of the gnome desktop (including boot splash and GDM). Is anyone out there interested? I think the first step is to upload your work/modifications/etc... to either a new launchpad bzr or to the user art page in the wiki. Second step would be to talk to the dev team in either #ubuntustudio-devel or on the development mailing list. -Eric -- ___ http://greyrockstudio.blogspot.com -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Addition(s) to the Video Meta package
After looking into getting LiVES packaged for Ubuntu, it looks like it won't happen unless there are changes made upstream (i.e. in the LiVES source code). The folder titled libOSC in the LiVES tarball contains files that are under a non-free license. These files will prevent any package from being accepted into the Ubuntu archives and thus prevent it from being part of Ubuntu Studio. Sorry for the bad news, hopefully this can be changed upstream in future releases. -Eric Hedekar On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Eric Hedekar aftertheb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ronan, I'm not sure what troubles you're having with your mailing list registration (I did get your first response to my e-mail - where you cc'ed Salsaman). Hope you get that sorted out. As for the getdeb.net package of Lives, they don't provide a source package for anyone to view (and the Ubuntu archives requires a source package upload). However, it looks like there is someone attempting to get it packaged for Ubuntu: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/lives and they've commented on this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/103616 I'm not a video guy myself and it'd be nice for all the developers to hear a little more about Lives and its capabilities. In particular, is it mostly a NLE, or is it's focus on live effects processing? As for the currently packaged apps that I suggested be added to the video meta, FreeJ - possible, but it's interface is strange EffecTV - seems a little more like a fun toy than a serious gig/production tool Frei0r - no real reason to include this if it's just a library, if a program like Lives or kdenlive is included then it will naturally get installed as a dependency so there's no point in directly including it in the meta GEM - I REALLY think this would be a great addition to the meta. Beyond that, I'd like to see Lives packaged, and may contact the person working toward that (ask if they're going to update to 1.0.0 or stick to the 0.9.8). -Eric Hedekar On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Ronan Jouchet ro...@jouchet.fr wrote: Hello Eric, It seems I have some issues with my registration to the ubuntu-studi...@lists.ubuntu.com mailing lists. By the time I sort them out, here is a forward of a mail I sent as an answer to your Addition(s) to the Video Meta package. First you have my mail, then Gabriel (LiVES author, salsa...@xs4all.nl) answer. Reposting this to the list and adding your comments would be great. Please CC Gabriel. Thanks, Ronan Original Message Subject: Re: Addition(s) to the Video Meta package Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:53:08 +0200 From: salsa...@xs4all.nl To: Ronan Jouchet ro...@jouchet.frro...@jouchet.fr CC: ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com, ubuntu-studio-us...@lists.ubuntu.com On Sat, August 1, 2009 13:38, Ronan Jouchet wrote: Hi Eric, hi everybody, My two cents about LiVES: - Though not officially in ubuntu, it is currently regularly packaged by the getdeb team (http://www.getdeb.net/app/LiVES ). Does it mean it can be easily suggested via REVU? - Note also that it has been maturing quite nicely recently, and seems IMHO one of the most well-maintained apps mentioned here. I added salsaman (LiVES author) to this discussion. Cheers, Ronan Yes indeed, LiVES has been receiving increasing attention since the recent stable 1.0.0 release, and the excellent review in Linux Journal: http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/it-lives-video-editing-foss-movie-makers As you mention, it is regularly packaged by the team at getdeb.net, and I have been working closely with them to make sure that the ubuntu version is bug free. This is particularly important to me as the main LiVES development machine is running ubuntu (currently 64 bit Jaunty). Many of my users have asked about why LiVES is not included in ubuntu studio (in fact the question came up just this week at the conference I am at). Since I know a little about these apps I can comment on them. FreeJ is a video application which is mostly used for installations. Rather unusually for a video app, it has an emacs-like inteface. It is well maintained but release are not as frequent as with other apps. It is developed by Jaromil, also known for Rastasoft and dynebolic. EffecTV is one of the most long lived video projects, dating back to the 1990's, developed by Kentaro Fukuchi. It's a simple app which takes a webcam input and applies various realtime effects to it. I think it is currently no longer maintained. Many of the effects have been ported to other applications (for example veejay and LiVES). Frei0r is an effects library/framework developed my members of piksel.http://www.piksel.org/frei0r. The aim is to provide a basic set of cross platform video effects. The project is growing in popularity, and is currently in use by LiVES and now kdenlive. GEM is an opengl extension for pd (pure data). If you already
Re: Addition(s) to the Video Meta package
Hi Ronan, I'm not sure what troubles you're having with your mailing list registration (I did get your first response to my e-mail - where you cc'ed Salsaman). Hope you get that sorted out. As for the getdeb.net package of Lives, they don't provide a source package for anyone to view (and the Ubuntu archives requires a source package upload). However, it looks like there is someone attempting to get it packaged for Ubuntu: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/lives and they've commented on this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/103616 I'm not a video guy myself and it'd be nice for all the developers to hear a little more about Lives and its capabilities. In particular, is it mostly a NLE, or is it's focus on live effects processing? As for the currently packaged apps that I suggested be added to the video meta, FreeJ - possible, but it's interface is strange EffecTV - seems a little more like a fun toy than a serious gig/production tool Frei0r - no real reason to include this if it's just a library, if a program like Lives or kdenlive is included then it will naturally get installed as a dependency so there's no point in directly including it in the meta GEM - I REALLY think this would be a great addition to the meta. Beyond that, I'd like to see Lives packaged, and may contact the person working toward that (ask if they're going to update to 1.0.0 or stick to the 0.9.8). -Eric Hedekar On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Ronan Jouchet ro...@jouchet.fr wrote: Hello Eric, It seems I have some issues with my registration to the ubuntu-studi...@lists.ubuntu.com mailing lists. By the time I sort them out, here is a forward of a mail I sent as an answer to your Addition(s) to the Video Meta package. First you have my mail, then Gabriel (LiVES author, salsa...@xs4all.nl) answer. Reposting this to the list and adding your comments would be great. Please CC Gabriel. Thanks, Ronan Original Message Subject: Re: Addition(s) to the Video Meta package Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:53:08 +0200 From: salsa...@xs4all.nl To: Ronan Jouchet ro...@jouchet.frro...@jouchet.fr CC: ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com, ubuntu-studio-us...@lists.ubuntu.com On Sat, August 1, 2009 13:38, Ronan Jouchet wrote: Hi Eric, hi everybody, My two cents about LiVES: - Though not officially in ubuntu, it is currently regularly packaged by the getdeb team (http://www.getdeb.net/app/LiVES ). Does it mean it can be easily suggested via REVU? - Note also that it has been maturing quite nicely recently, and seems IMHO one of the most well-maintained apps mentioned here. I added salsaman (LiVES author) to this discussion. Cheers, Ronan Yes indeed, LiVES has been receiving increasing attention since the recent stable 1.0.0 release, and the excellent review in Linux Journal: http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/it-lives-video-editing-foss-movie-makers As you mention, it is regularly packaged by the team at getdeb.net, and I have been working closely with them to make sure that the ubuntu version is bug free. This is particularly important to me as the main LiVES development machine is running ubuntu (currently 64 bit Jaunty). Many of my users have asked about why LiVES is not included in ubuntu studio (in fact the question came up just this week at the conference I am at). Since I know a little about these apps I can comment on them. FreeJ is a video application which is mostly used for installations. Rather unusually for a video app, it has an emacs-like inteface. It is well maintained but release are not as frequent as with other apps. It is developed by Jaromil, also known for Rastasoft and dynebolic. EffecTV is one of the most long lived video projects, dating back to the 1990's, developed by Kentaro Fukuchi. It's a simple app which takes a webcam input and applies various realtime effects to it. I think it is currently no longer maintained. Many of the effects have been ported to other applications (for example veejay and LiVES). Frei0r is an effects library/framework developed my members of piksel.http://www.piksel.org/frei0r. The aim is to provide a basic set of cross platform video effects. The project is growing in popularity, and is currently in use by LiVES and now kdenlive. GEM is an opengl extension for pd (pure data). If you already include pd then it would be logical to include GEM as well since many patches make use of it. pd-vj-tools : strangely enough I am currently at a conference with the authors of this. It is pretty new and may not yet be stable. veejay : a great project, the author seems to have been taking a bit of a break since the 1.0 release, but probably worth including. gephex: an interesting project, but no longer actively maintained. Hope this helps, Salsaman, main developer, LiVEShttp://lives.sourceforge.net Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:13:18 -0700 From: Eric Hedekaraftertheb
Addition(s) to the Video Meta package
Hi Everyone, I've seen a number of posts to the forums asking about live video adjustment software, VJ software and the like. There actually is a large amount of this available for Linux but none in the Ubuntu Studio video meta package. Here's a quick list of what I've stumbled upon: * FreeJ http://freej.org/ packaged: http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=freej * EffecTV http://effectv.sourceforge.net/ packaged: http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=effectv * frei0r plugins: http://www.piksel.org/frei0r packaged: http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=frei0r-plugins (more of a library than a software package) * GEM library for Pure Data http://gem.iem.at/ packaged: http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=gem * PDvjtools http://artefacte.org/pd/ not packaged (yet) * VeeJay http://www.veejayhq.net/not packaged (yet) * Gephex http://www.gephex.org/ not packaged (yet) * Lives http://lives.sourceforge.net/ not packaged (yet) Personally I think any one of these softwares would make a great addition to the video meta package, but seeing as I'm not a video junkie I really am not sure if they'll get used. This e-mail is to judge public interest/support for such an addition to the meta, and if it's positive, which of the above (or possibly one I haven't listed) would be best? Logically, adding one that's already in the repositories would be easiest for Karmic, but if packaging wasn't a stumbling block I'd prefer to see VeeJay added (purely based on the look of it's user interface). The libraries for Pure Data would also be nice additions since Pure Data is already included in the audio meta. FreeJ also looks good. Thoughts? -Eric Hedekar -- ___ http://greyrockstudio.blogspot.com -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Fonts in the Graphics Meta
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Cory K.coryis...@gmail.com wrote: Eric Hedekar wrote: Hey everyone, I was up late working on a poster and for the life of me couldn't find the perfect font for the job. That's when I did an 'apt-cache search font' and realized that there's a massive cornucopia of font packages in the repositories awaiting my install. That's when I thought to myself: Self, why aren't these font packages part of the Ubuntu Studio graphics meta package? I think it would be organizationally best (if the list concurs that fonts in the graphics package would be good) to have a font meta package that is in turn a dependency of the graphics meta (simply because the sheer number of font packages would clutter the graphics package if added directly). The other question on my mind is would it be okay to include non-free fonts in this meta? and for that I turn the floor over to those more experienced... I think this is a great idea actually. But, we should only ship free fonts. @Eric: Could you compile a list of font packages available in Main and Universe? When I find the time, I'll gladly jump on this. If someone beats me to it however, I won't be the least bit upset. -Eric -- ___ http://greyrockstudio.blogspot.com -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Fonts in the Graphics Meta
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:21 PM, imag1nary numberimag1narynum...@hotmail.com wrote: Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:21:15 -0700 Subject: Fonts in the Graphics Meta From: aftertheb...@gmail.com To: ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Hey everyone, I was up late working on a poster and for the life of me couldn't find the perfect font for the job. That's when I did an 'apt-cache search font' and realized that there's a massive cornucopia of font packages in the repositories awaiting my install. That's when I thought to myself: Self, why aren't these font packages part of the Ubuntu Studio graphics meta package? I think it would be organizationally best (if the list concurs that fonts in the graphics package would be good) to have a font meta package that is in turn a dependency of the graphics meta (simply because the sheer number of font packages would clutter the graphics package if added directly). The other question on my mind is would it be okay to include non-free fonts in this meta? and for that I turn the floor over to those more experienced... -Eric Hedekar I agree that this is a good idea. I also agree with Cory K. in that only the free fonts would be bundled. And of course, those are the ones that should be used for paying gigs anyhow. :-) ~ imag1narynumber As for that list of fonts, there are a number of traditional japanese or other similar language-specific fonts that I noticed when searching the other night. Should these be included in the font meta or should we stick to western lettered fonts (I know there's a proper name for these)? -Eric -- ___ http://greyrockstudio.blogspot.com -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Testing Ubuntu Studio ISO
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Scott Lavenderslaven...@consolidated.net wrote: I have a few questions about testing the latest Ubuntu Studio iso. Can a rewritable dvd be used for this? Yes. Are there standard testing procedures for Ubuntu Studio (e.g. start Jack and Ardour, apt-get install foo, etc)? There are four levels of testing that I like to do: 1) does the install succeed? (with all the meta packages selected) 2) does the ensuing boot process succeed? 3) do all the essential features of Ubuntu Studio work (Jack, Networking, Blender, firewire, etc...) ? 4) can I find any bugs in normal program usage? This is an old wiki writeup on the subject: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/Cases/UbuntuStudio If there isn't and someone(s) will provide some information then I would be happy to type up something on the Ubuntu Studio Help wiki page regarding testing. You can see what I typed up for Ubuntu Studio Controls here: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuStudioControls I think I'm not alone when I say this, give me a little direction and I am happy to help. Also I went to the qa tracker but cannot find the ubuntu studio iso to download for testing. Can someone tell me where it is? This is where it should be for alpha beta images: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/build/ubuntustudio/all This is where the daily builds can be found: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntustudio/daily/current/ Hope that helps a bit. If you have more questions don't hesitate to ask. And please do write this up into the documentation, it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. -Eric Hedekar -- ___ http://greyrockstudio.blogspot.com -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Ubuntu Studio meeting 26 of June 09 (01:00am UTC)
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Luis de Bethencourt lui...@ubuntu.comwrote: Hello everybody, We are holding a Ubuntu Studio meeting the Thursday 26 of June 2009, at 01:00am UTC (that is the night of the 25 to the 26). Everybody is invited. Members and Developers of the Ubuntu Studio team _must_ attend. Users are suggest to do so :) Luis de Bethencourt -- Luis de Bethencourt Guimerá luisbg lui...@ubuntu.com GPG: B0ED1326 Luis, I believe you've forgotten to mention where. If I recall, you had mentioned it's going to be in the #ubuntu-meeting IRC chat room. -Eric -- ___ http://greyrockstudio.blogspot.com -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: Ubuntu Studio meeting 26 of June 09 (01:00am UTC)
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Luis de Bethencourt lui...@ubuntu.comwrote: Hello everybody, We are holding a Ubuntu Studio meeting the Thursday 26 of June 2009, at 01:00am UTC (that is the night of the 25 to the 26). Everybody is invited. Members and Developers of the Ubuntu Studio team _must_ attend. Users are suggest to do so :) Luis de Bethencourt -- Luis de Bethencourt Guimerá luisbg lui...@ubuntu.com GPG: B0ED1326 Luis, I believe you've forgotten to mention where. If I recall, you had mentioned it's going to be in the #ubuntu-meeting IRC chat room. -Eric -- ___ http://greyrockstudio.blogspot.com -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Meeting to discuss the current state of play.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Luis de Bethencourt lui...@ubuntu.comwrote: On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Eric Hedekaraftertheb...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Luis de Bethencourt lui...@ubuntu.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 2:06 AM, Eric Hedekaraftertheb...@gmail.com wrote: So with two weekends passing and not many people mentioning their availability, I think it's best to set a date/time and see who can/can't make it. I propose the meeting to discuss the next development cycle (and other plans) be set for June 28th at 6pm GMT. Who can and can't make this date/time? What would a better/worse time be? PLEASE SPEAK NOW OR HOLD YOUR PEACE! Last possible date for adjustment of the proposed date I will set for June 24th at Midnight GMT. -Eric Sorry for the late reply. I've been in Barcelona at Sonar the last week, hell buys, poor internet connection and too much to do. I did a demo of freemix and while doing it said a few words about Ubuntu Studio \m/ June 28th is going to be complicated for me. I'm taking that week off from work, going back to the Canary Islands and from the 26th of June to the 2nd of July will be sailing with my parents. Which is the big problem, I will be losing communication with the world every now and then, and internet connection is going to be really scarce. From the 3rd of July to the 11th I will still be in the Canary Islands but settled home attending GUADEC (anybody else going?) So anytime those does is great, I dont mind doing a crazy hour in the night. Then back to Dublin, where once again I will be always available. Sorry about the inconvenience, Luis So if you leave on the 26th and essentially won't be available until the 11th or so, should we go forth with the plans for a meeting at Midnight UTC June 24th as Luke had suggested? Or Luis could you suggest a better time that would work for you? -Eric The night of the 24th is good for me. Luis Okay, well I think it's as good a time as any. Let's set it for Midnight UTC on June 24th (going on 25th) and send out announcements right away. Where should we have it? #ubuntustudio-devel or #ubuntustudio? I assume we'll announce it to the user list as well as the dev list? I might be able to write that up in about 10hours, but if anyone wants to beat me to the punch, go right ahead. -Eric -- ___ http://greyrockstudio.blogspot.com -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Meeting to discuss the current state of play.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Jussi Schultink juss...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Easiest way to do this is please put the times you are available using the following link: http://doodle.com/7rur5k9k4cftq5nm Thanks Jussi Schultink Jussi, what's with the top-posting? Cory might get angry. But anyways, I've registered my available times (unfortunately this weekend isn't very good for me). I will try to run some tests later this week (on non-rt jack - both jaunty and karmic) to confirm/deny my need for RT. Oh and if I happen to not be able to make the meeting time, put my name into the hat for assisting with the website love. -Eric Hedekar -- ___ http://greyrockstudio.blogspot.com -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Meeting to discuss the current state of play.
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Luke Yelavich them...@ubuntu.com wrote: Hi guys Since I am in a similar timezone to just about all of you, I suggest we try and have a meeting either via skype or IRC to discuss what we want to do this cycle. Please reply to this message suggesting possible times, and I will see what suits me, since I am at UDS. Thanks Luke I'm at -08:00 from UTC so I'd prefer something not too early, more like evening time UTC. Oh, and on a weekday. -Eric Hedekar -- ___ http://greyrockstudio.blogspot.com -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: New application: jackpanel, how to contribute?
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Hans Baier hansfba...@googlemail.comwrote: Hi, I wrote a GNOME panel applet as a replacement for qjackctl: http://www.hans-baier.de/wordpress/jackpanel (depends on libprolooks: http://www.hans-baier.de/wordpress/libprolooks) I already debianized it, and I currently develop on Hardy. How can I contribute it / make it ready for the next release of ubuntustudio? Thanks, Hans Hi Hans, Your application looks interesting (haven't had time to give it an install yet). The first step after you've debianized it would be to also debianize libprolooks (a little harder task). Then you'll need to get both of them accepted into the universe repositories (if you want them to eventually become part of Ubuntu Studio). The way you get a package accepted: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/ (here's a little howto: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Packages/REVU ) it also helps to prod motu people in #ubuntu-motu for help on this (they're the guys who will eventually okay your packages). If you want it in Karmic Koala, the deadline for acceptance is August 27th. After it's in the repositories then Ubuntu Studio devs can consider it for inclusion into the meta packages (I like the idea). If that sounds like too much work let us know and we may be able to attempt to package it through REVU (though there's lots of packages on that wishlist). Also, you might be interested in taking a look at LADITools: http://www.marcochapeau.org/software/laditools they also have created an applet for Jack use/control. -Eric -- ___ http://greyrockstudio.blogspot.com -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
9.04 announce? website update?
So the official 9.04 announcement went out a good seven+ hours ago, which included a link to http://www.ubuntustudio.org/downloads however there have been zero updates to the Ubuntu Studio webpage and that link directs people to download 8.10 Is there a reason for the delayed Ubuntu Studio release? I see images up at http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntustudio/releases/9.04/release/ but I've yet to see any links pointing people there, or release notes publicized. Infact the working release notes don't even publicize that link. what gives? we're so close to finishing the release cycle, let's not quit an inch from the goal line. -Eric -- ___ http://greyrockstudio.blogspot.com -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
