Re: Product Activation? Ugh.
Hi, just to confirm, in my case it just worked. Only issue is the different emailaddresses used for confirmation and automatically put into the registration-field by Versions. Greetings, Rolf Am 18.11.2008 um 01:44 schrieb AussieAbroad: > > Did product activation actually work for anyone? I purchase directly > after upgrading the beta and after entering in the details provided in > the email I get "Invalid License, please try again" > > Let me know if anyone is having any luck. > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Completely confused on revert to rev X
Do a google search for "svn merge" II know, I know.. but honestly, its what you're looking for. (also, check back about a week or so in this mail group ;) ) -k- On Nov 17, 2008, at 10:38 PM, Sam H wrote: > > I'm totally confused by how the "Revert to Revision.." feature works. > > I have a file, let's say main.c, currently checked out at rev 8. I > want to revert to rev 6. So I right click on main.c, choose "Revert > main.c to Revision..." and double click on rev 6. Now I've got rev 6, > but if I make changes and try to commit, it says it's out of date. > So I do "update," but now it's merged my changes in with rev 8 which I > don't want. > > I can't even figure out how to do this via svn command line. How do I > just go back to rev 6 and commit it as rev 9? > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: License Agreement --- Only 1 install???
Hi Dirk, I'm glad you guys understand how developers work (Work on only one machine? no way! Minimum: laptop + desktop, and as others have noted, often: desktop (home office), desktop (office), laptop (everywhere else!)). However, I think your license agreement should be explicit in granting what you say above. The problem with leaving it the way it is now is that it's not clear if we are in violation or not (not sure how a post on a forum plays legally - does that constitute an "official" amendment to a license agreement? Why not put what you said above into the license agreement and make it explicit? "As long as you don't use Versions simultaneously on multiple machines, we're absolutely cool if you use the same license code on several machines as long as those are all machines belonging or primarily used by the same person." That seems to say it pretty well to me. My only gripe _might_ be that when I'm debugging a nasty bug I sometimes work on two machines at the same time, well, generally time-slicing, but using both back and forth. I'd like to be able to leave Versions open on both machines while I do that, but it's not a show-stopper if I have to quit one and then relaunch (boring though!). For reference, The OMNI Group license for OmniOutliner contains this: "The Omni Group grants to you a non-exclusive, limited right to install and use The Omni Group software program downloaded or contained on the CD-ROM or disk (the "Software"). The license permits either (a) multiple users to install and use the Software on a single machine; or (b) a single user to install and use the Software on multiple machines. However, a single license does not allow multiple users to ever use Software on multiple machines, regardless of whether such use is concurrent, except in the case of Family Pack licensing. " Clause (b) is the one that pertains to your situation (I don't know that you want to allow (a), though that seems reasonable to me also). Some developers make it more restrictive and say only use it on two machines, and only purchaser/licensee may use it. E.g., BBEdit: "You may use the program and documentation on not more than two (2) machines and copy the program and documentation into any machine-readable or printed form for backup or support of your use of the program and documentation on either or both machines, provided that no copy of the program and documentation may be used by anyone other than you." Please consider amending your License agreement to be more explicit about supporting the configurations many/most developers actually want/ need to use. Thank you, tyler --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Completely confused on revert to rev X
I'm totally confused by how the "Revert to Revision.." feature works. I have a file, let's say main.c, currently checked out at rev 8. I want to revert to rev 6. So I right click on main.c, choose "Revert main.c to Revision..." and double click on rev 6. Now I've got rev 6, but if I make changes and try to commit, it says it's out of date. So I do "update," but now it's merged my changes in with rev 8 which I don't want. I can't even figure out how to do this via svn command line. How do I just go back to rev 6 and commit it as rev 9? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Suggestions - compare (diff) almost anywhere
There are some areas that are screaming for the ability to diff. For example: if I right click a file and choose "Revert X to Revision" and the history comes up, I should be able to right click any of those revisions and either view the full file or do a diff with another version. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: License registration issues fixed
> I'm still seeing these entries in the console.log: > > 2008-11-18 00:05:20.644 Versions[12782] *** -[NSCFString > stringByReplacingOccurrencesOfString:withString:]: selector not > recognized [self = 0x16524ae0] > 2008-11-18 00:05:20.647 Versions[12782] *** -[NSCFString > stringByReplacingOccurrencesOfString:withString:]: selector not > recognized [self = 0x16524ae0] FWIW, I'm likewise getting the same error in the console. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Server Realm: Authorization Realm
I keep getting this popup asking for my credentials to "Server Realm: Authorization Realm". I believe it is trying to get access to my Time Capsule but for some reason no matter what I do, it keeps popping up. Can make a guy a bit insane. Anyone else solve this? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: License registration issues fixed
>With the help of several people on the list we've been able to figure >out the root of the Versions registration problems some of you have >run into. > >If you click "Check for Updates..." in the "Versions" menu, Versions >1.0.1 will be available, which should allow everybody to register >Versions as expected. > >For some mysterious reason this problem did not show up on any of our >9 internal testing machines. > >Sorry for the trouble, have fun with your registered copy of >Versions :) Still failing here. Dual 2.5 GHz PowerPC G5 - 10.4.11 I'm still seeing these entries in the console.log: 2008-11-18 00:05:20.644 Versions[12782] *** -[NSCFString stringByReplacingOccurrencesOfString:withString:]: selector not recognized [self = 0x16524ae0] 2008-11-18 00:05:20.647 Versions[12782] *** -[NSCFString stringByReplacingOccurrencesOfString:withString:]: selector not recognized [self = 0x16524ae0] --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
History Log: what's the first "Show Changes" supposed to do?
The History Log dialog displays two "show changes" buttons: an upper button below the list of revisions, and a lower below the list of changed paths in the revison. The lower button's function shows the diff between revisions for the selected path. And the upper does... what? All it seems to do for me is show a spinner for a couple of seconds. Anyone get anything different or have some idea of what this is really supposed to do? Thanks, G --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: License not working, support form failing
Version 1.01 fixed it for me, thanks for the quick update! Jeff --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Message: Do you wish to accept the following certificate? OVER AND OVER
Ryan, I sure hope so. I just clicked on the "Accept for this session" and it STILL came back in about 5 minutes or so, asking again. I've just shut down the app rather than continue to be bothered by the popups... ~ Chris --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Message: Do you wish to accept the following certificate? OVER AND OVER
Hey Chris, I think others have experienced the same bug. I know I have experienced this one many times. I'm waiting to see if they post a fix of some sort in one of the other posts. ~ Ryan On Nov 17, 7:23 pm, wchrisjohnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > MANY thanks for getting the license issue resolved! > > I have one other outstanding issue with Versions now. I keep getting > the above message every 5 minutes or so. Apparently, Versions is > trying to contact my OLD svn hosting service (for some reason). I > recently moved all my repos to a new service; I verified my repos > today in Versions. They all point to the new provider. > > I have three options for resolving the above message: Reject, Accept > in this Session Only, or Accept Forever. > > I keep clicking Reject, but it only lasts 5 minutes or so. > > I will NOT click Accept Forever. > > I could always cllick Accept in this session, but that would postponse > the inevitable. > > Anyone else with this issue? > > Chris --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: License registration issues fixed
Hi Dirk, Just FYI, I've updated to 1.0.1, but the issue described at the following thread persists: http://groups.google.com/group/versions/browse_thread/thread/9b2eb95368581ca9/ffce5157f64961cf#ffce5157f64961cf Cheers, David On Nov 17, 7:03 pm, Dirk Stoop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With the help of several people on the list we've been able to figure > out the root of the Versions registration problems some of you have > run into. > > If you click “Check for Updates...” in the ”Versions” menu, Versions > 1.0.1 will be available, which should allow everybody to register > Versions as expected. > > For some mysterious reason this problem did not show up on any of our > 9 internal testing machines. > > Sorry for the trouble, have fun with your registered copy of > Versions :) > > Thanks, > -Dirk > the Versions team --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Message: Do you wish to accept the following certificate? OVER AND OVER
Hi, MANY thanks for getting the license issue resolved! I have one other outstanding issue with Versions now. I keep getting the above message every 5 minutes or so. Apparently, Versions is trying to contact my OLD svn hosting service (for some reason). I recently moved all my repos to a new service; I verified my repos today in Versions. They all point to the new provider. I have three options for resolving the above message: Reject, Accept in this Session Only, or Accept Forever. I keep clicking Reject, but it only lasts 5 minutes or so. I will NOT click Accept Forever. I could always cllick Accept in this session, but that would postponse the inevitable. Anyone else with this issue? Chris --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
License registration issues fixed
With the help of several people on the list we've been able to figure out the root of the Versions registration problems some of you have run into. If you click “Check for Updates...” in the ”Versions” menu, Versions 1.0.1 will be available, which should allow everybody to register Versions as expected. For some mysterious reason this problem did not show up on any of our 9 internal testing machines. Sorry for the trouble, have fun with your registered copy of Versions :) Thanks, -Dirk the Versions team --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: License not working, support form failing
Great, message sent. As someone whose purchased the software and is failing the registration process I sure would appreciate a fix. It's a mystery why some developers continue to punish their customers with these activation schemes despite evidence that it does nothing to stop piracy, and may encourage it. On Nov 17, 2:49 pm, Dirk Stoop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi everone, > > We're getting closer to a solution and have almost figured out the > regression of the registration bug. > > If some of you who are experiencing similar issues with registering > could email a system profile to [EMAIL PROTECTED], we'd really > appreciate it. Please use the subject "Registration bug profile". > > To make a system profile, use 'System Profiler' in 'Applications/ > Utilities'. > > Thanks! > - Dirk --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Problem with externals that use ssl certificates
On Nov 18, 2008, at 12:26 AM, Sofa wrote: > > Hey Robert, > > Thats what we get for adding features at a 1.0 :-( > > We will look into it and either make it work or provide you with a way > to disable auto updating for that specific repository. Hi koen, Great to hear you guys will look into this:-) For the dutchies: negatieve aandacht is ook aandacht :-D Marijn > Sorry for the troubles. > > Koen > > On Nov 17, 11:52 pm, Robert Goldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I have a working directory, let's call it "wd1," that contains >> external definitions to a different repository host. That repository >> host must be reached through ssl, and requires certificates for >> authentication. >> >> I am able to put information in ~/.subversion/servers specifying >> certificates and certificate passwords for that host. Using that >> information I am able to update wd1 through the command-line as "svn >> update". However, I am *not* able to update wd1 through >> versions. It >> seems that versions is not able to use the certificate information in >> ~/.subversions/servers. I also found that if the connection prompted >> me for a password, it would cause an error in versions. Versions did >> not seem to be able to intercept the password request. >> >> I wasn't terribly bothered by this until recently --- it wasn't that >> much trouble to update wd1 through the command-line, and most of my >> interactions with wd1 worked fine. >> >> However, I just pulled a new update of versions, and now the behavior >> is much worse. Versions seems to be polling the repository for this >> working directory, causing it to repeatedly pop up a dialog window, >> prompting me for my userid and password for this server. This is >> very >> annoying --- it effectively causes versions to lock up, and even if I >> cancel out of the dialog box, it just comes back later. >> >> Is there some way to avoid this behavior? Is there some way I can >> make versions attend to my .subversion/servers file? >> >> I have just checked, and svn update from the command line still works >> fine. >> >> Thanks for any suggestions. > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: A note of thanks
I'd like to agree with this, you guys must have had a great and terrible night at the same time:-) On Nov 17, 2008, at 10:37 PM, Kerri Miller wrote: > > Hey guys on the Versions team > > Wow, what a day! Launches suck, and it sounds like you guys have your > hands full with technical issues. > > Thanks for making an attractive SVN client that /feels/ right and > integrates will into my Mac workflow, that my designers, editors, and > junior developers aren't afraid of. Thanks for keeping the software > focused on what it is, and not try to expand it to being a full- > fledged SVN administration tool. Thanks for keeping it focused on > doing what it should do well. > > -k- > > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Remote/local changes
If you've made changes to your working copy, they are "local changes". If someone else has committed changes to the repository, and you haven't updated to get them yet, then these are "remote changes". HTH, Ray On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 8:01 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > got exactly the same question, hope somebody can explain. > > On Nov 18, 7:51 am, xprmntlav8r <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The newest release of Versions has an indicator to the right of the > > working copy bookmark. When I place the cursor over this indicator I > > get a popup that tells me "1 local change", or "2 remote changes/1 > > local change", etc. What is the meaning of this? What's the > > difference between a local change and a remote change? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Hal > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: is svn merge, svn switch planned features?
Branching/tagging are supported in the form of copying, which is how svn branches/tags. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Product Activation? Ugh.
There's a known problem with activation right now. We're scrambling to get it fixed asap. More news soon, - Dirk Stoop the Versions team On Nov 18, 1:44 am, AussieAbroad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Did product activation actually work for anyone? I purchase directly > after upgrading the beta and after entering in the details provided in > the email I get "Invalid License, please try again" > > Let me know if anyone is having any luck. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Remote/local changes
got exactly the same question, hope somebody can explain. On Nov 18, 7:51 am, xprmntlav8r <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The newest release of Versions has an indicator to the right of the > working copy bookmark. When I place the cursor over this indicator I > get a popup that tells me "1 local change", or "2 remote changes/1 > local change", etc. What is the meaning of this? What's the > difference between a local change and a remote change? > > Thanks. > > Hal --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: is svn merge, svn switch planned features?
I would add Branching support to that request. On Nov 17, 11:32 am, echo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To help my purchasing decision, can the authors confirm if svn merge > and svn switch are planned features? Thanks. > reference > post:http://groups.google.com/group/versions/browse_thread/thread/736ec0d2... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Feature Request: "Spinning" Progress Spinner
I find it difficult to see if the app is updating the cirrent view since the only indication is a tiny "spinner" icon that appears at the top of the "Name" column. When I work in a large repository this header if often scrolled out of view. It would be adventageous if the main "refresh" icon in the top right would become an animated spinning 'spinner' when a refresh or activity is underway. Just a thought - this would also bring it in line with other Mac UI guideline behavior. Thanks for considering, Rohan (aka AussieAbroad) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Product Activation? Ugh.
Did product activation actually work for anyone? I purchase directly after upgrading the beta and after entering in the details provided in the email I get "Invalid License, please try again" Let me know if anyone is having any luck. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: "Waiting for transactions to finish"
There's something called SSHAskPassTool that quit unexpectedly when I force-quit Versions 1.0. It's part of the Versions package. The log says: Application Specific Information: *** Terminating app due to uncaught exception 'NSInvalidReceivePortException', reason: 'connection went invalid while waiting for a reply' So apparently Versions is failing to SSH to it's home server. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Website is awfully broken
We're sorry about the problems with the website. The feedback form has been tried and tested, but for some reason it failed the moment more than a handful of people actually started to visit the website. We're working to have these issues fixed asap. - Dirk the Versions team On Nov 18, 12:09 am, sdafasf sdafasf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Download link links to "#" and the super-fancy script fails to work in > Opera 9.6. > > When I open Feedback link from within the application (which I had to > download via Safari), it goes to home page rather than feedback page. > > When I go to feedback page myself, "Solving problems Experiencing > trouble? Look here first." text is really a text, not a link. > > "Send us an e-mail" form ends up on google's domain!? and of course > throws an error, requesting me to report to google's support. WTF!? > > I'm appalled that a simple static page can fail in so many ways in > such basic areas of functionality. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Problem with externals that use ssl certificates
Hey Robert, Thats what we get for adding features at a 1.0 :-( We will look into it and either make it work or provide you with a way to disable auto updating for that specific repository. Sorry for the troubles. Koen On Nov 17, 11:52 pm, Robert Goldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a working directory, let's call it "wd1," that contains > external definitions to a different repository host. That repository > host must be reached through ssl, and requires certificates for > authentication. > > I am able to put information in ~/.subversion/servers specifying > certificates and certificate passwords for that host. Using that > information I am able to update wd1 through the command-line as "svn > update". However, I am *not* able to update wd1 through versions. It > seems that versions is not able to use the certificate information in > ~/.subversions/servers. I also found that if the connection prompted > me for a password, it would cause an error in versions. Versions did > not seem to be able to intercept the password request. > > I wasn't terribly bothered by this until recently --- it wasn't that > much trouble to update wd1 through the command-line, and most of my > interactions with wd1 worked fine. > > However, I just pulled a new update of versions, and now the behavior > is much worse. Versions seems to be polling the repository for this > working directory, causing it to repeatedly pop up a dialog window, > prompting me for my userid and password for this server. This is very > annoying --- it effectively causes versions to lock up, and even if I > cancel out of the dialog box, it just comes back later. > > Is there some way to avoid this behavior? Is there some way I can > make versions attend to my .subversion/servers file? > > I have just checked, and svn update from the command line still works > fine. > > Thanks for any suggestions. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Mime types for Illustrator files
Hey Zav, Good point, especially considering we are Illustrator users ourselves :-) We will look into it. Kindest regards, Koen Bok - madebysofa.com On Nov 17, 10:49 pm, Zav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One area where the SVN documentation is very poor is that it tells you > that you can set the mime types for files but it does not tell you > where or how to set it for a file type. I'd love to find out how to > set illustrator files as binary and for some reason PSD files already > are. Is there a syntax to use and a config file to put it in? I've > already scoured the docs for the proper incarnation of command to put > in the the config file - if that's even the place to do it. Any > ideas? I don't want Versions attempting to merge my AI files. > > Thanks, > - Zav --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Website is awfully broken
Download link links to "#" and the super-fancy script fails to work in Opera 9.6. When I open Feedback link from within the application (which I had to download via Safari), it goes to home page rather than feedback page. When I go to feedback page myself, "Solving problems Experiencing trouble? Look here first." text is really a text, not a link. "Send us an e-mail" form ends up on google's domain!? and of course throws an error, requesting me to report to google's support. WTF!? I'm appalled that a simple static page can fail in so many ways in such basic areas of functionality. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Product Activation? Ugh.
Thank you so much for your response. Although I still don't like the activation, your answers at least clear up a few things enough that at least alleviate most of my concerns. On Nov 17, 5:18 pm, Sofa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear all, I know not everyone is fond of activations, and they have > their downsides, but there are many reasons for us to go this way and > we can be totally open about it. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Problem with externals that use ssl certificates
I have a working directory, let's call it "wd1," that contains external definitions to a different repository host. That repository host must be reached through ssl, and requires certificates for authentication. I am able to put information in ~/.subversion/servers specifying certificates and certificate passwords for that host. Using that information I am able to update wd1 through the command-line as "svn update". However, I am *not* able to update wd1 through versions. It seems that versions is not able to use the certificate information in ~/.subversions/servers. I also found that if the connection prompted me for a password, it would cause an error in versions. Versions did not seem to be able to intercept the password request. I wasn't terribly bothered by this until recently --- it wasn't that much trouble to update wd1 through the command-line, and most of my interactions with wd1 worked fine. However, I just pulled a new update of versions, and now the behavior is much worse. Versions seems to be polling the repository for this working directory, causing it to repeatedly pop up a dialog window, prompting me for my userid and password for this server. This is very annoying --- it effectively causes versions to lock up, and even if I cancel out of the dialog box, it just comes back later. Is there some way to avoid this behavior? Is there some way I can make versions attend to my .subversion/servers file? I have just checked, and svn update from the command line still works fine. Thanks for any suggestions. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: License not working, support form failing
Hi everone, We're getting closer to a solution and have almost figured out the regression of the registration bug. If some of you who are experiencing similar issues with registering could email a system profile to [EMAIL PROTECTED], we'd really appreciate it. Please use the subject "Registration bug profile". To make a system profile, use 'System Profiler' in 'Applications/ Utilities'. Thanks! - Dirk On Nov 17, 11:29 pm, Sofa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey all, > > We're still working on it, sorry for the troubles. I'll keep you > updated. > > Kindest regards, > > Koen Bok - madebysofa.com > > On Nov 17, 10:03 pm, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hmm... registration is still borked, I haven't (won't) try with my dot- > > mac as I'm wanting to move away from it. Hopefully the guys can fix up > > the license database on their end. > > > Versions is definitely populating via the default mail address in the > > Address Book. > > > Additionally, Mail is now showing (following my update of my default > > address) these two license key emails as being sent to my MobileMe and > > dot-mac (and not work email address), so obviously there's some > > jiggery pokery going on with the email addressing in Mail + Address > > Book entries. At least by examining the email source it looks like the > > license key mails went to just my personal address. > > > Just need to get license key bound to my MobileMe account and I'm > > good :) > > > On Nov 17, 8:50 pm, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > By the time I posted, it looks like the answer of where the app was > > > getting my work email address from was posted herein. Thanks, at least > > > it appears that nothing untoward is going on :) > > > > On Nov 17, 8:48 pm, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Snap. I am experiencing the exact same issues too only I received two > > > > emails with the same license key - one to my work email address and > > > > dot-mac, and the other (again) to my work email address and MobileMe. > > > > > When I purchased the license, I used my MobileMe address, and I used > > > > my dot-mac when I originally registered for the beta so I can > > > > understand the mix-up (based on the app storing my dot-mac address and > > > > then getting confused upon registration). > > > > > I'm a little concerned with where Versions is getting my work email > > > > address from as I certainly haven't used it with this app in the past. > > > > > Hopefully, it's pulling it from *somewhere* within my OS X install > > > > locally, but I would be a little more than upset if the app is digging > > > > about for other email addresses bound to my OS X login account and > > > > sending them over the wire.. > > > > > On Nov 17, 8:32 pm, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Something interesting I noticed. I registered my license under my home > > > > > email address. Versions seems to want to pre-populate the dialog with > > > > > my work email address instead. Everytime I go into the dialog to try > > > > > and resubmit, I have to change my email address back to my home > > > > > address before clicking submit (my name and license key are retained > > > > > properly). > > > > > > Could it possibly be that it's using the wrong email address for a > > > > > checksum? > > > > > > If not, other hints would be appreciated. > > > > > > Jeff --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: A note of thanks
Thanks for the kind words all. We did indeed get bitten by some bugs and are solving them as we speak. Pete, if you have specific stability issues with Versions please let us know and we can help you out. Kindest regards, Koen Bok - madebysofa.com On Nov 17, 10:55 pm, javery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll add my quick two cents here too. (Please take my other comments > about licensing etc. for what they are, just feedback). > > Overall, it's a great product, and I'm pleased that finally released > it! Congratulations to the entire team. > > Jeff --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: License not working, support form failing
Hey all, We're still working on it, sorry for the troubles. I'll keep you updated. Kindest regards, Koen Bok - madebysofa.com On Nov 17, 10:03 pm, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm... registration is still borked, I haven't (won't) try with my dot- > mac as I'm wanting to move away from it. Hopefully the guys can fix up > the license database on their end. > > Versions is definitely populating via the default mail address in the > Address Book. > > Additionally, Mail is now showing (following my update of my default > address) these two license key emails as being sent to my MobileMe and > dot-mac (and not work email address), so obviously there's some > jiggery pokery going on with the email addressing in Mail + Address > Book entries. At least by examining the email source it looks like the > license key mails went to just my personal address. > > Just need to get license key bound to my MobileMe account and I'm > good :) > > On Nov 17, 8:50 pm, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > By the time I posted, it looks like the answer of where the app was > > getting my work email address from was posted herein. Thanks, at least > > it appears that nothing untoward is going on :) > > > On Nov 17, 8:48 pm, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Snap. I am experiencing the exact same issues too only I received two > > > emails with the same license key - one to my work email address and > > > dot-mac, and the other (again) to my work email address and MobileMe. > > > > When I purchased the license, I used my MobileMe address, and I used > > > my dot-mac when I originally registered for the beta so I can > > > understand the mix-up (based on the app storing my dot-mac address and > > > then getting confused upon registration). > > > > I'm a little concerned with where Versions is getting my work email > > > address from as I certainly haven't used it with this app in the past. > > > > Hopefully, it's pulling it from *somewhere* within my OS X install > > > locally, but I would be a little more than upset if the app is digging > > > about for other email addresses bound to my OS X login account and > > > sending them over the wire.. > > > > On Nov 17, 8:32 pm, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Something interesting I noticed. I registered my license under my home > > > > email address. Versions seems to want to pre-populate the dialog with > > > > my work email address instead. Everytime I go into the dialog to try > > > > and resubmit, I have to change my email address back to my home > > > > address before clicking submit (my name and license key are retained > > > > properly). > > > > > Could it possibly be that it's using the wrong email address for a > > > > checksum? > > > > > If not, other hints would be appreciated. > > > > > Jeff --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Purchased licenses, one of them stall on the Processing.. screen
Hey guys, We know there are some activation issues right now, mainly because our server overloaded. We are looking into it and it should be fixed pretty soon. Sorry for that. David: you can use any name there you want, so I'd use the name of the person that will actually use the license. Kindest regards, Koen Bok - madebysofa.com On Nov 17, 11:24 pm, dtwist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ditto - Same experience. > > Auto-update to 1.0. "Waiting for transactions to complete" > Wait ~10 minutes - force quit. > Versions auto-relaunches. > > Select "Versions:Register Versions..." > Enter serial number, check terms box, click register. > Header says "processing" > Wait several minutes - nothing. > Force-quit, re-launch. > > Rinse and repeat. > > One note: I'm not sure if I need to enter anything in the name and > email fields. We purchased 5 seats, and I'd prefer not to use our > CEO's name on each installation... > > Activation issues aside, congrats guys. Versions is a joy to use! > > Cheers, > David Twist, CTO > Jade Orchard --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: "Waiting for transactions to finish"
Hey all, If you quit Versions while it's updating from a server, it attempts to clean up the connections before quitting. If that takes longer than a couple of seconds we consider it a bug, so wel'll look into it. Kindest regards, Koen Bok - madebysofa.com On Nov 17, 9:35 pm, sologroupmc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I got the same error on both laptop and desktop when upgrading to 1.0 > from Beta. After force quit, the 1.0 version works, but will not let > me know register with valid serial code. > > On Nov 17, 2:18 pm, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Every time I want to close the program, I get this message that stays > > up for ever. I don't know if I wanted long enough but after 10 minutes > > I forced the program to close. > > > Any idea? > > > P.S.: I am using the last version (non beta). --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Purchased licenses, one of them stall on the Processing.. screen
Ditto - Same experience. Auto-update to 1.0. "Waiting for transactions to complete" Wait ~10 minutes - force quit. Versions auto-relaunches. Select "Versions:Register Versions..." Enter serial number, check terms box, click register. Header says "processing" Wait several minutes - nothing. Force-quit, re-launch. Rinse and repeat. One note: I'm not sure if I need to enter anything in the name and email fields. We purchased 5 seats, and I'd prefer not to use our CEO's name on each installation... Activation issues aside, congrats guys. Versions is a joy to use! Cheers, David Twist, CTO Jade Orchard --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Font
Hey David, It's Neutraface. Kindest regards, Koen Bok - madebysofa.com On Nov 17, 11:14 pm, ErneX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It must be Lucida Grande/Lucida (if you are on a Mac), if not then > you'll see Verdana o sans-serif > > On Nov 17, 5:27 pm, "david.vanscott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Anyone have any ideas what font the word Versions is in on the new > > site? I'm really digging the font. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Product Activation? Ugh.
Dear all, I know not everyone is fond of activations, and they have their downsides, but there are many reasons for us to go this way and we can be totally open about it. > * Does Versions now phone-home every time you launch it or just when > you enter the license code? Just when you enter the code. > * Am I now forced to run Versions from a machine that has internet > access? Only during registering, yes. > * What happens when I get a new machine(s)? Do I have to go through > some annoying deactivation process first? What if I am unable to > deactivate other machines due to HD failure or something? You can just install Versions on the new machine without troubles. > * What is Sofa's long-term policy for the licensing servers? > Specifically, what happens when you decide to no longer support the > product or even specific versions of the app (ie. a forced upgrade)? We will never force you to upgrade, and keep the servers online or disable the activation system. > After so many months of beta testing and anxious waiting, I'm > absolutely bummed that I won't be able to enjoy this great piece of > software. I'm sorry to hear that. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Font
It must be Lucida Grande/Lucida (if you are on a Mac), if not then you'll see Verdana o sans-serif On Nov 17, 5:27 pm, "david.vanscott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone have any ideas what font the word Versions is in on the new > site? I'm really digging the font. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: "Invalid license: Please try again."
Dear Beckley, We know we have some problems at this point (Murphy loves releases) and we're working really hard to solve them, you will certainly be able to register before the demo ends. Kindest regards, Koen Bok - madebysofa.com Beckley wrote: > Paid, got my code. Copy/Pasted it from the email. Can't register. WTF? > > This has been such a great experience in beta. This license though, > sucks, as does the bugginess of this launch (I too had to force-quit > the app after the auto-update). > > Why is 1.0 so different from the last beta? Isn't the whole idea to > beta test the real launch version before you call it 1.0? That is > really lame. > > It would be helpful to be able to register my software before the demo > period is up. > > Thanks, > Beckley --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: A note of thanks
I'll add my quick two cents here too. (Please take my other comments about licensing etc. for what they are, just feedback). Overall, it's a great product, and I'm pleased that finally released it! Congratulations to the entire team. Jeff --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Product Activation? Ugh.
A simple license code without activation would suffice, and I'd gladly pay more for that license. Additionally, they could provide unique, "watermarked" downloads of the app for each licensee for legal prosecution if desired. No, it's not the perfect solution, but nothing ever will be. At least this solution doesn't inconvenience the person actually taking the time and financial effort to pay for the software! The "indecent people" are not the ones that wrote the software or made the decision to implement a draconian licensing mechanism, so no, they are not wasting my time. Regardless, I don't want to turn this into a debate. I asked legitimate support questions relating to the licensing in my original post to which I still hope to get an answer on. The fact is that software copyright infringement will always exist and people like me DO pay for the developer's time. In my own anecdotal experience developing software, the people that infringe would never pay for the software anyway. As someone else already said already -- it's only the paying customers who suffer. On Nov 17, 4:17 pm, Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What would you suggest to them as a license model? It sucks that decent > people have to put blocks up on decent software because indecent people > steal it, the fact is that it's the indecent people who are wasting your > time, not the developers who want to be paid for their work (time). --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Mime types for Illustrator files
One area where the SVN documentation is very poor is that it tells you that you can set the mime types for files but it does not tell you where or how to set it for a file type. I'd love to find out how to set illustrator files as binary and for some reason PSD files already are. Is there a syntax to use and a config file to put it in? I've already scoured the docs for the proper incarnation of command to put in the the config file - if that's even the place to do it. Any ideas? I don't want Versions attempting to merge my AI files. Thanks, - Zav --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Product Activation? Ugh.
On Nov 17, 4:17 pm, Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What would you suggest to them as a license model? 1. Generate a license key based on details that I provide when I purchase the license, including full name, company and email address. Make sure that you can derive these details from the key. 2. Provide your paying customers, with the key, and ask them to enter these same details, including the key (i.e. string) to activate the product. Once activated, it remains activated. 3. At runtime, check the key against the other provided license details before running. If they don't match, don't run. Display the username and email address in the About dialog, and the splash screen when the app starts up. (Make it obvious who "owns" the license to help people self-enforce). 4. Don't rely on any "call home" to check the license. This inconveniences legitimate users and does absolutely nothing useful to prevent the license mechanism from being hacked. This won't enforce the requirement of "install x times and only run one instance concurrently", but meets other requirements. It has the added bonus of no longer requiring you, the software developer/publisher, to even be involved past purchase. > It sucks that decent people have to put blocks up on decent software > because indecent people steal it, the fact is that it's the indecent people > who > are wasting your time, not the developers who want to be paid for their > work (time). I absolutely, whole-heartedly support software development. I make my living doing it, and support anyone else who attempts to do the same. However, draconian enforcement has been shown repeatedly, in study after study, to have _zero_ positive effect. It inconveniences legitimate, paying users, and has _no_ detrimental impact on people who would steal the software. They'll steal it in any case. Lots of talented people out there will crack your authentication mechanism, usually within days of you releasing it. Is that right? Of course not. A lot of companies knee-jerk licensing though, and end up inadvertently causing their legitimate customers problems, without having much impact on whether their software is stolen. Can of worms :) Jeff --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
A note of thanks
Hey guys on the Versions team Wow, what a day! Launches suck, and it sounds like you guys have your hands full with technical issues. Thanks for making an attractive SVN client that /feels/ right and integrates will into my Mac workflow, that my designers, editors, and junior developers aren't afraid of. Thanks for keeping the software focused on what it is, and not try to expand it to being a full- fledged SVN administration tool. Thanks for keeping it focused on doing what it should do well. -k- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
"Invalid license: Please try again."
Paid, got my code. Copy/Pasted it from the email. Can't register. WTF? This has been such a great experience in beta. This license though, sucks, as does the bugginess of this launch (I too had to force-quit the app after the auto-update). Why is 1.0 so different from the last beta? Isn't the whole idea to beta test the real launch version before you call it 1.0? That is really lame. It would be helpful to be able to register my software before the demo period is up. Thanks, Beckley --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Product Activation? Ugh.
What would you suggest to them as a license model? It sucks that decent people have to put blocks up on decent software because indecent people steal it, the fact is that it's the indecent people who are wasting your time, not the developers who want to be paid for their work (time). On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:48 PM, kiddailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Great example. Yes, they will probably fix it eventually... but what > if it happens again? Three times? For a month at a time? > > And you're right, they do seem to be quite decent folk (and have > written a great piece of software). But even decent people running > decent companies sometimes have to make hard business decisions. As a > paying customer with clients that rely on my productivity, I'd prefer > to not be a victim of any consequences of those decisions. > > -J > > On Nov 17, 3:37 pm, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > situation is a perfect example: I bought a license 6 hours ago, and it > > fails to validate on their server. I'm sure they'll eventually fix it > > (they seem like a decent folks) but in the meantime, I'm spending time > > posting on this forum, trying permutations of license details etc. in > > an attempt to get it working. Basically, I'm wasting _my_ time as a > > paying customer, trying to get around a broken license mechanism. > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Time to re-think.
Even Valve had issues when Half-Life 2 went gold thru their Steam service. I suggest a little bit of patience and things will be working normally soon enough. On Nov 17, 10:06 pm, Pete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been sitting back watching the threads here and it seems that > there is a decision to be made by the company. > > In my opinion, as a long-time software developer and senior manager > for a multi-million dollar business, it appears as though the v1.0 > release wasn't tested too well. Nor, were the mechanisms that are to > support it's release. > > It think it would be in everyone's best interest - even that of the > company to maintain "face" - that they roll-back their V1.0 until > everyone beta testing has tested it and given their sign of approval > that it works. In addition, those aspects of the release mechanism, > licensing, etc need to be tested and validated as well. > > At this point, even though the software has up to this point been a > very nice piece of work, these release "fumbles" are easily avoidable > with good QA and testing practices. > > In my humble opinion, a roll-back with refund should be top priority > until the team has fixed the issues with the commercial release - this > includes the mechanisms to handle the release. I don't think anyone > on this group would disagree that the today's experience has shown a > very pre-mature implementation. > > On the business side, one could conjecture as to why this may have > happened? Pressure form investors maybe - but that pressure may > certainly backfire in lost sales due to poor roll-out experience. > > So? Time for some soul searching > > JM2C > > Pete --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Time to re-think.
I've been sitting back watching the threads here and it seems that there is a decision to be made by the company. In my opinion, as a long-time software developer and senior manager for a multi-million dollar business, it appears as though the v1.0 release wasn't tested too well. Nor, were the mechanisms that are to support it's release. It think it would be in everyone's best interest - even that of the company to maintain "face" - that they roll-back their V1.0 until everyone beta testing has tested it and given their sign of approval that it works. In addition, those aspects of the release mechanism, licensing, etc need to be tested and validated as well. At this point, even though the software has up to this point been a very nice piece of work, these release "fumbles" are easily avoidable with good QA and testing practices. In my humble opinion, a roll-back with refund should be top priority until the team has fixed the issues with the commercial release - this includes the mechanisms to handle the release. I don't think anyone on this group would disagree that the today's experience has shown a very pre-mature implementation. On the business side, one could conjecture as to why this may have happened? Pressure form investors maybe - but that pressure may certainly backfire in lost sales due to poor roll-out experience. So? Time for some soul searching JM2C Pete --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: License not working, support form failing
Hmm... registration is still borked, I haven't (won't) try with my dot- mac as I'm wanting to move away from it. Hopefully the guys can fix up the license database on their end. Versions is definitely populating via the default mail address in the Address Book. Additionally, Mail is now showing (following my update of my default address) these two license key emails as being sent to my MobileMe and dot-mac (and not work email address), so obviously there's some jiggery pokery going on with the email addressing in Mail + Address Book entries. At least by examining the email source it looks like the license key mails went to just my personal address. Just need to get license key bound to my MobileMe account and I'm good :) On Nov 17, 8:50 pm, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > By the time I posted, it looks like the answer of where the app was > getting my work email address from was posted herein. Thanks, at least > it appears that nothing untoward is going on :) > > On Nov 17, 8:48 pm, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Snap. I am experiencing the exact same issues too only I received two > > emails with the same license key - one to my work email address and > > dot-mac, and the other (again) to my work email address and MobileMe. > > > When I purchased the license, I used my MobileMe address, and I used > > my dot-mac when I originally registered for the beta so I can > > understand the mix-up (based on the app storing my dot-mac address and > > then getting confused upon registration). > > > I'm a little concerned with where Versions is getting my work email > > address from as I certainly haven't used it with this app in the past. > > > Hopefully, it's pulling it from *somewhere* within my OS X install > > locally, but I would be a little more than upset if the app is digging > > about for other email addresses bound to my OS X login account and > > sending them over the wire.. > > > On Nov 17, 8:32 pm, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Something interesting I noticed. I registered my license under my home > > > email address. Versions seems to want to pre-populate the dialog with > > > my work email address instead. Everytime I go into the dialog to try > > > and resubmit, I have to change my email address back to my home > > > address before clicking submit (my name and license key are retained > > > properly). > > > > Could it possibly be that it's using the wrong email address for a > > > checksum? > > > > If not, other hints would be appreciated. > > > > Jeff --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: License not working, support form failing
By the time I posted, it looks like the answer of where the app was getting my work email address from was posted herein. Thanks, at least it appears that nothing untoward is going on :) On Nov 17, 8:48 pm, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Snap. I am experiencing the exact same issues too only I received two > emails with the same license key - one to my work email address and > dot-mac, and the other (again) to my work email address and MobileMe. > > When I purchased the license, I used my MobileMe address, and I used > my dot-mac when I originally registered for the beta so I can > understand the mix-up (based on the app storing my dot-mac address and > then getting confused upon registration). > > I'm a little concerned with where Versions is getting my work email > address from as I certainly haven't used it with this app in the past. > > Hopefully, it's pulling it from *somewhere* within my OS X install > locally, but I would be a little more than upset if the app is digging > about for other email addresses bound to my OS X login account and > sending them over the wire.. > > On Nov 17, 8:32 pm, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Something interesting I noticed. I registered my license under my home > > email address. Versions seems to want to pre-populate the dialog with > > my work email address instead. Everytime I go into the dialog to try > > and resubmit, I have to change my email address back to my home > > address before clicking submit (my name and license key are retained > > properly). > > > Could it possibly be that it's using the wrong email address for a > > checksum? > > > If not, other hints would be appreciated. > > > Jeff --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Product Activation? Ugh.
Great example. Yes, they will probably fix it eventually... but what if it happens again? Three times? For a month at a time? And you're right, they do seem to be quite decent folk (and have written a great piece of software). But even decent people running decent companies sometimes have to make hard business decisions. As a paying customer with clients that rely on my productivity, I'd prefer to not be a victim of any consequences of those decisions. -J On Nov 17, 3:37 pm, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > situation is a perfect example: I bought a license 6 hours ago, and it > fails to validate on their server. I'm sure they'll eventually fix it > (they seem like a decent folks) but in the meantime, I'm spending time > posting on this forum, trying permutations of license details etc. in > an attempt to get it working. Basically, I'm wasting _my_ time as a > paying customer, trying to get around a broken license mechanism. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: License not working, support form failing
Snap. I am experiencing the exact same issues too only I received two emails with the same license key - one to my work email address and dot-mac, and the other (again) to my work email address and MobileMe. When I purchased the license, I used my MobileMe address, and I used my dot-mac when I originally registered for the beta so I can understand the mix-up (based on the app storing my dot-mac address and then getting confused upon registration). I'm a little concerned with where Versions is getting my work email address from as I certainly haven't used it with this app in the past. Hopefully, it's pulling it from *somewhere* within my OS X install locally, but I would be a little more than upset if the app is digging about for other email addresses bound to my OS X login account and sending them over the wire.. On Nov 17, 8:32 pm, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Something interesting I noticed. I registered my license under my home > email address. Versions seems to want to pre-populate the dialog with > my work email address instead. Everytime I go into the dialog to try > and resubmit, I have to change my email address back to my home > address before clicking submit (my name and license key are retained > properly). > > Could it possibly be that it's using the wrong email address for a > checksum? > > If not, other hints would be appreciated. > > Jeff --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: "Waiting for transactions to finish"
I got the same error on both laptop and desktop when upgrading to 1.0 from Beta. After force quit, the 1.0 version works, but will not let me know register with valid serial code. On Nov 17, 2:18 pm, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Every time I want to close the program, I get this message that stays > up for ever. I don't know if I wanted long enough but after 10 minutes > I forced the program to close. > > Any idea? > > P.S.: I am using the last version (non beta). --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: License not working, support form failing
Steve, Thanks, I figured that's what was happening. My concern was more that this was related to the registration bug (i.e. it was using an address book email address to calculate a checksum to feed into the license check, instead of using the email address from the registration form). Long shot I know, but it was odd behaviour ;) Jeff On Nov 17, 3:40 pm, orclinstall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jeff, > > It appears that it is taking the default mail address out of the > Address Book. When I modified my Address Book entry to set the > default mail address to my proper email, Versions picked it up > properly. > > Steve > > On Nov 17, 12:32 pm, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Something interesting I noticed. I registered my license under my home > > email address. Versions seems to want to pre-populate the dialog with > > my work email address instead. Everytime I go into the dialog to try > > and resubmit, I have to change my email address back to my home > > address before clicking submit (my name and license key are retained > > properly). > > > Could it possibly be that it's using the wrong email address for a > > checksum? > > > If not, other hints would be appreciated. > > > Jeff --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: License not working, support form failing
Jeff, It appears that it is taking the default mail address out of the Address Book. When I modified my Address Book entry to set the default mail address to my proper email, Versions picked it up properly. Steve On Nov 17, 12:32 pm, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Something interesting I noticed. I registered my license under my home > email address. Versions seems to want to pre-populate the dialog with > my work email address instead. Everytime I go into the dialog to try > and resubmit, I have to change my email address back to my home > address before clicking submit (my name and license key are retained > properly). > > Could it possibly be that it's using the wrong email address for a > checksum? > > If not, other hints would be appreciated. > > Jeff --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Product Activation? Ugh.
Strange. All the other software I've purchased was 'delivered' and works just fine without any product activation ;) And I'd say comparing the activation of Sofa to Adobe's is a bit unrealistic. The likelihood of Adobe or their activation servers going away is far, far, far less than Sofa's doing the same. In terms of internet access, I meant: Do you have to have internet access when you launch the app so that it can phone home and verify its license. Not everyone uses SVN from the WAN. Amusing quote though, thanks for the laugh! On Nov 17, 3:22 pm, yesod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 17, 12:15 pm, kiddailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To paraphrase Winston Churchill, "Product activation is the absolute > worst form of software delivery known to man...other than everything > else we've tried." > > My Adobe apps work great; same with Ableton Live and Native > Instruments Komplete. > > I doubt many users keep all their machines on the same subnet... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Product Activation? Ugh.
Bump for this, well-stated. It's a shame that companies feel they have to do this: it inconveniences paying users, and is a minor obstacle at best for anyone that really wants to steal the software. I've been burned a few times in the past, and I'm pretty disappointed to find that they've locked Versions down this tight. My current situation is a perfect example: I bought a license 6 hours ago, and it fails to validate on their server. I'm sure they'll eventually fix it (they seem like a decent folks) but in the meantime, I'm spending time posting on this forum, trying permutations of license details etc. in an attempt to get it working. Basically, I'm wasting _my_ time as a paying customer, trying to get around a broken license mechanism. Jeff On Nov 17, 3:15 pm, kiddailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone that has had to deal with Adobe or Microsoft activation errors > and problems knows that product activation is an insult to the > customer. Anyone who has bought DRM music and had the licensing > service go away knows this. Anyone who has tried running an old game > only to discover that the licensing server is no longer available > knows this. > > I absolutely HATE the idea of having such a *major* piece of > productivity software that I paid for and depend on being at risk of > accidental or purposeful de-activation by some company that has no > real incentive to care once I've given them my money. > > * Does Versions now phone-home every time you launch it or just when > you enter the license code? > > * Am I now forced to run Versions from a machine that has internet > access? > > * What happens when I get a new machine(s)? Do I have to go through > some annoying deactivation process first? What if I am unable to > deactivate other machines due to HD failure or something? > > * What is Sofa's long-term policy for the licensing servers? > Specifically, what happens when you decide to no longer support the > product or even specific versions of the app (ie. a forced upgrade)? > > After so many months of beta testing and anxious waiting, I'm > absolutely bummed that I won't be able to enjoy this great piece of > software. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: License not working, support form failing
Something interesting I noticed. I registered my license under my home email address. Versions seems to want to pre-populate the dialog with my work email address instead. Everytime I go into the dialog to try and resubmit, I have to change my email address back to my home address before clicking submit (my name and license key are retained properly). Could it possibly be that it's using the wrong email address for a checksum? If not, other hints would be appreciated. Jeff --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: License not working, support form failing
Me too. I get Invalid machine ID 02=DFj5D and the support form isn't working. On Nov 17, 8:38 am, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I purchased a single license, received it via email, and attempted to > install it. It doesn't work - I'm getting an "Invalid machine ID" > error when I try and register. > > Anyone else see this? I suspect that the servers may just be > overwhelmed... > > Jeff --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Product Activation? Ugh.
On Nov 17, 12:15 pm, kiddailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone that has had to deal with Adobe or Microsoft activation errors > and problems knows that product activation is an insult to the > customer. To paraphrase Winston Churchill, "Product activation is the absolute worst form of software delivery known to man...other than everything else we've tried." My Adobe apps work great; same with Ableton Live and Native Instruments Komplete. > Am I now forced to run Versions from a machine that has internet access? I doubt many users keep all their machines on the same subnet... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: "Waiting for transactions to finish"
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 9:18 PM, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Every time I want to close the program, I get this message that stays > up for ever. I don't know if I wanted long enough but after 10 minutes > I forced the program to close. > > Any idea? I had the same problem but only during software update and I had to kill Versions and run it again to get update working. Best, Pawel Solyga --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
"Waiting for transactions to finish"
Every time I want to close the program, I get this message that stays up for ever. I don't know if I wanted long enough but after 10 minutes I forced the program to close. Any idea? P.S.: I am using the last version (non beta). --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Product Activation? Ugh.
Anyone that has had to deal with Adobe or Microsoft activation errors and problems knows that product activation is an insult to the customer. Anyone who has bought DRM music and had the licensing service go away knows this. Anyone who has tried running an old game only to discover that the licensing server is no longer available knows this. I absolutely HATE the idea of having such a *major* piece of productivity software that I paid for and depend on being at risk of accidental or purposeful de-activation by some company that has no real incentive to care once I've given them my money. * Does Versions now phone-home every time you launch it or just when you enter the license code? * Am I now forced to run Versions from a machine that has internet access? * What happens when I get a new machine(s)? Do I have to go through some annoying deactivation process first? What if I am unable to deactivate other machines due to HD failure or something? * What is Sofa's long-term policy for the licensing servers? Specifically, what happens when you decide to no longer support the product or even specific versions of the app (ie. a forced upgrade)? After so many months of beta testing and anxious waiting, I'm absolutely bummed that I won't be able to enjoy this great piece of software. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Argh! svn 1.5 warning would be appropriate
> Is there a way to reverse whatever Versions did to it? I suspect worst > case I could just do the checkout over again (I hope). The actual repo isn't affected. Just checkout the repo again. If you need details: If you have uncommitted changes, you either have to commit them now (obviously using Versions and not the command line), or abandon them if you were just tinkering, or make those changes again after you fix your working copy. -- rename your current working copy folder by adding "OLD" or something just to keep a copy of it for now (that way you don't lose any changes you were working on) -- use Terminal to do the checkout over again to get a fresh working copy from the repository. I use svn info to copy the path I originally used for the checkout. -- gw --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: License not working, support form failing
I'm also seeing the same issue. "Invalid License" error when attempting to register using the info provided in the registration email. Thanks, Steve On Nov 17, 10:25 am, Peekay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm having trouble as well - but I'm getting "Invalid License" quite > quickly in response. I copied the License from the email, do the > other items need to be specific? > > I have used the email address I used when registering - and my name, > but does this need to be just my name, my company name or a combo of > both? > > Paul --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Coupon not working?
Never mind me, it works now
On Nov 17, 6:46 pm, REBELinBLUE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to purchase versions but my coupon isn't working
>
> The check button returns the following response to the AJAX request
>
> {"coupon_valid": false, "coupon_discount": "0.00", "price_ex": "39",
> "price": "46.41", "tax": "7.41", "subtotal_dollar": "59", "discount":
> "0.00", "taxnumber_valid": false, "total": "46.41", "subtotal":
> "39.00", "european": true}
>
> Any ideas?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Versions" group.
To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: License Agreement --- Only 1 install???
Activation?! Ugh. No thanks. I've had enough of that crap with Adobe and Microsoft. Unfortunate deal break for me. What a bummer. On Nov 17, 11:53 am, Dirk Stoop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Emphasis should be on "Sofa may, at its sole discretion, for your > convenience decide to allow you to activate Versions on additional > computers within reasonable limits.". Well, decision made :) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
is svn merge, svn switch planned features?
To help my purchasing decision, can the authors confirm if svn merge and svn switch are planned features? Thanks. reference post: http://groups.google.com/group/versions/browse_thread/thread/736ec0d2642d5144/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Academic discount?
I wonder if versions will have academic discount. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Argh! svn 1.5 warning would be appropriate
Gave Versions a quick try, poked around, made one small commit as a test. Server for that repo is 1.4, and now the command line interface from my system to that repo won't work and complains that the client is too old to work with the working copy. Versions should be able to recognize a 1.4 wc and at least warn users it is about to erradicate backwards compatibility! Is there a way to reverse whatever Versions did to it? I suspect worst case I could just do the checkout over again (I hope). -- gw --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Purchased licenses, one of them stall on the Processing.. screen
Trying to register one of our serial numbers, the little Processing... window comes up and never goes away. I have to force quit to get back into the app. This has happened with the same serial, when trying to install on first the desktop, then the laptop. Both are Intel, running 10.4.11. One indication similar between laptop and desktop is that both, when using the Auto-download of the updated Versions app via the Versions menu, stalled when restarting the application. It popped up a little window saying: Finishing all Versions transactions. I had to force quit and restart Versions to get back into the app. Of the 2 licenses we purchased, my collegue installed the other one on his desktop and it worked right away. Thanks for your assistance. Michael Check --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Coupon not working?
I am trying to purchase versions but my coupon isn't working
The check button returns the following response to the AJAX request
{"coupon_valid": false, "coupon_discount": "0.00", "price_ex": "39",
"price": "46.41", "tax": "7.41", "subtotal_dollar": "59", "discount":
"0.00", "taxnumber_valid": false, "total": "46.41", "subtotal":
"39.00", "european": true}
Any ideas?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Versions" group.
To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Ignore in Contextual Menu
Thank you so much for including this feature in 1.0 -- however, I can't seem to ignore a bloody thing. Is there a secret? I have to admit, I'm not an SVN master and have been waiting for the contextual option because I couldn't get it to work otherwise. I'm using the trial of 1.0, build 49. Thanks! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: License not working, support form failing
I'm having trouble as well - but I'm getting "Invalid License" quite quickly in response. I copied the License from the email, do the other items need to be specific? I have used the email address I used when registering - and my name, but does this need to be just my name, my company name or a combo of both? Paul --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: License not working, support form failing
Hi Koen, Unfortunately, it still fails. "Invalid machine ID 02=DEE1e" Any help would be appreciated. If you think it's still related to the servers being overloaded, I can wait another day or so. Thanks Jeff On Nov 17, 11:41 am, Sofa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey Jeff, > > Indeed our servers are running hot :-( > > Could you try again in an hour and let me know if it worked? > > Kindest regards, > > Koen Bok - madebysofa.com > > On Nov 17, 5:38 pm, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I purchased a single license, received it via email, and attempted to > > install it. It doesn't work - I'm getting an "Invalid machine ID" > > error when I try and register. > > > Anyone else see this? I suspect that the servers may just be > > overwhelmed... > > > Jeff --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Versions keeps asking me to authenticate
Hey Ceriel, The .subversion directory is : /Users/USERNAME/.subversion (the . makes it invisible in Finder by default - use the shell to see it) Mark's tip below about changing the permissions/ownership of the directory is promising too. I haven't tried the 1.0 release yet, maybe this bug disappears.. G'luck, Drew On Nov 16, 5:17 am, Ceriel Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Koen, > > Would you pleae explain in more detail: > > > - Subversions authentication cache is screwed up. Move > > your .subversion folder aside and reset up your repositories. > > 1. Where can I find .subversion? > 2. How do we reset up our repositories? > > Ceriel --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: License Agreement --- Only 1 install???
thanks for the info. license purchased and deployed on my 123, er 2 macs. good work! (why did i have to pay the full price, even though the code was displayed? well, nevermind) all the best, chr On Nov 17, 5:53 pm, Dirk Stoop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi guys, > > As the author of the license agreement, please let me clear up the > intent of these limitations. > > Here's the relevant text from the EULA: > > "The Commercial License and NFR License both do not allow Versions to > be activated and used on more computers than the number of computers > you have obtained said License(s) for. Sofa may, at its sole > discretion, for your convenience decide to allow you to activate > Versions on additional computers within reasonable limits. > Notwithstanding such a decision you are only licensed to use Versions > simultaneously on the amount of computers you have obtained said > License(s) for." > > As usual with these kinds of agreements, the language is a bit harsher > than the intent. > > Emphasis should be on "Sofa may, at its sole discretion, for your > convenience decide to allow you to activate Versions on additional > computers within reasonable limits.". Well, decision made :) > > As long as you don't use Versions simultaneously on multiple machines, > we're absolutely cool if you use the same license code on several > machines as long as those are all machines belonging or primarily used > by the same person. > > Our assumption was that people would try to use the same license code > on several of their personal machines anyway, the language in the > license agreement is there so there can be no doubt that we have the > right to block license codes that are being (ab)used excessively. > > Please drop me a line, or follow-up here, if you have further > questions about the EULA. > > Thanks :) > - Dirk Stoop > > Sofa / Versions > > On Nov 17, 5:44 pm, Hugues Lismonde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Same here... If I have to shell out 39€ per machine, I'd rather buy > > Cornerstone at 54€, more features and up to 2 computers (not perfect > > but much better). > > > Hugues > > On 17 Nov 2008, at 17:37, Jeff wrote: > > > > I absolutely agree. I rotate between 2 machines, only working on > > > one at a time. I'll purchase one license for myself, for my laptop, > > > but I refuse to purchase a second license for the two or three times > > > a week I need to use my desktop machine. > > > > This is disappointing. I was expecting to purchase multiple user > > > licenses for my company when Versions was released. Instead, > > > I'm going to recommend that we standardize on a different > > > package instead. I can't justify 2-3x the cost per developer. > > > > Best of luck, it's a great product - but understand that you're going > > > to lose a lot of potential licenses by trying to force people to > > > but multiple licenses. > > > > Jeff --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Continuous updates caused a force quit.
> > Hey Guys, > > I purchased and downloaded the new Versions app today. I must say, > that I absolutely LOVE it so far. The recent updates are great. I'm > only experiencing one problem so far, and it might have to do with the > continuous updates / version checking that the newest version does. > > The Problem: I have a repository for a client of mine that does not > need a username / password combo and only logs in and makes updates > with an ssh key. Versions seems to stop on this repository and > continually pop up a username / password combo every 2 minutes. I > tried having it save a user / password combo permanently, but it kept > popping up the login info dialog. I'm also facing this problem. Would be great to see this fixed. > In order to get around this, I planned on just closing the app down > when I don't need it, but that was also unsuccessful because it grayed > out the "quit" action in the file menu and it wouldn't quit with cmd+q > or from the apple dock either. Which caused me to have to force quit > to close the application. > > My guess is that those two problems are probably related. > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Huge memory usage in 1.0 release
Hey Daniel, Thanks for reporting, we'll look into it soon. Kindest regards, Koen Bok - madebysofa.com On Nov 17, 6:22 pm, Daniel Dickison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The 1.0 release seems to use a whole lot more memory than beta 9 did. > I'm guessing it has to do with the "number of modified files for each > bookmark" indicator. > > After I first launch Versions, Activity Monitor shows Versions using > up 50%-150% of the CPU and "Real Memory" gradually increasing to about > 240 MB over the course of a few minutes. This is a lot more than it > was using prior to the release (I believe it never exceeded 100 MB or > so). I'm guessing it's a leak since the memory usage doesn't drop > after the initial spurt of activity. The big initial CPU usage > subsides, but will occasionally pick up again even when the app is > sitting in the background. > > I'm stuck with 640 MB of RAM at work so this is a bit painful. Hope > this can be addressed soon. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Continuous updates caused a force quit.
Hey Guys, I purchased and downloaded the new Versions app today. I must say, that I absolutely LOVE it so far. The recent updates are great. I'm only experiencing one problem so far, and it might have to do with the continuous updates / version checking that the newest version does. The Problem: I have a repository for a client of mine that does not need a username / password combo and only logs in and makes updates with an ssh key. Versions seems to stop on this repository and continually pop up a username / password combo every 2 minutes. I tried having it save a user / password combo permanently, but it kept popping up the login info dialog. In order to get around this, I planned on just closing the app down when I don't need it, but that was also unsuccessful because it grayed out the "quit" action in the file menu and it wouldn't quit with cmd+q or from the apple dock either. Which caused me to have to force quit to close the application. My guess is that those two problems are probably related. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: License Agreement --- Only 1 install???
Sofa & Pico, Once again, you prove to be a bunch of highly decent people! Good luck, I'm sure Versions will be a success. Thanks for the preview, you obviously hooked a bunch of us early. -Ray PS How much will 2.0 be? Of course I am expecting seamless git support, get to work! ;) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Huge memory usage in 1.0 release
The 1.0 release seems to use a whole lot more memory than beta 9 did. I'm guessing it has to do with the "number of modified files for each bookmark" indicator. After I first launch Versions, Activity Monitor shows Versions using up 50%-150% of the CPU and "Real Memory" gradually increasing to about 240 MB over the course of a few minutes. This is a lot more than it was using prior to the release (I believe it never exceeded 100 MB or so). I'm guessing it's a leak since the memory usage doesn't drop after the initial spurt of activity. The big initial CPU usage subsides, but will occasionally pick up again even when the app is sitting in the background. I'm stuck with 640 MB of RAM at work so this is a bit painful. Hope this can be addressed soon. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Some sort of indication in the left pane with repos that have uncommitted changes
Hehe, hence my ; ), it was hard to restrain myself... On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:11 PM, dep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Wow!! Seems this made it in to the new version! amazing! > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Some sort of indication in the left pane with repos that have uncommitted changes
Wow!! Seems this made it in to the new version! amazing! On Nov 10, 11:42 am, Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wouldn't it be nice if there was also a number for changes made to the > repository that haven't been updated in the working copy? > > Just a little longer... ; ) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: License Agreement --- Only 1 install???
Hi Dirk, I just sent you (or Versions) an e-mail also about the license stuff, sorry for a double posting! That is absolutely great and wonderful if we can install it on multiple computers but only use it on one at a time! That solves all my problems. Thanks for clearing that up! Keep up the good work! -Drew On Nov 17, 10:53 am, Dirk Stoop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi guys, > > As the author of the license agreement, please let me clear up the > intent of these limitations. > > Here's the relevant text from the EULA: > > "The Commercial License and NFR License both do not allow Versions to > be activated and used on more computers than the number of computers > you have obtained said License(s) for. Sofa may, at its sole > discretion, for your convenience decide to allow you to activate > Versions on additional computers within reasonable limits. > Notwithstanding such a decision you are only licensed to use Versions > simultaneously on the amount of computers you have obtained said > License(s) for." > > As usual with these kinds of agreements, the language is a bit harsher > than the intent. > > Emphasis should be on "Sofa may, at its sole discretion, for your > convenience decide to allow you to activate Versions on additional > computers within reasonable limits.". Well, decision made :) > > As long as you don't use Versions simultaneously on multiple machines, > we're absolutely cool if you use the same license code on several > machines as long as those are all machines belonging or primarily used > by the same person. > > Our assumption was that people would try to use the same license code > on several of their personal machines anyway, the language in the > license agreement is there so there can be no doubt that we have the > right to block license codes that are being (ab)used excessively. > > Please drop me a line, or follow-up here, if you have further > questions about the EULA. > > Thanks :) > - Dirk Stoop > > Sofa / Versions > > On Nov 17, 5:44 pm, Hugues Lismonde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Same here... If I have to shell out 39€ per machine, I'd rather buy > > Cornerstone at 54€, more features and up to 2 computers (not perfect > > but much better). > > > Hugues > > On 17 Nov 2008, at 17:37, Jeff wrote: > > > > I absolutely agree. I rotate between 2 machines, only working on > > > one at a time. I'll purchase one license for myself, for my laptop, > > > but I refuse to purchase a second license for the two or three times > > > a week I need to use my desktop machine. > > > > This is disappointing. I was expecting to purchase multiple user > > > licenses for my company when Versions was released. Instead, > > > I'm going to recommend that we standardize on a different > > > package instead. I can't justify 2-3x the cost per developer. > > > > Best of luck, it's a great product - but understand that you're going > > > to lose a lot of potential licenses by trying to force people to > > > but multiple licenses. > > > > Jeff --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: License Agreement --- Only 1 install???
Hi guys, As the author of the license agreement, please let me clear up the intent of these limitations. Here's the relevant text from the EULA: "The Commercial License and NFR License both do not allow Versions to be activated and used on more computers than the number of computers you have obtained said License(s) for. Sofa may, at its sole discretion, for your convenience decide to allow you to activate Versions on additional computers within reasonable limits. Notwithstanding such a decision you are only licensed to use Versions simultaneously on the amount of computers you have obtained said License(s) for." As usual with these kinds of agreements, the language is a bit harsher than the intent. Emphasis should be on "Sofa may, at its sole discretion, for your convenience decide to allow you to activate Versions on additional computers within reasonable limits.". Well, decision made :) As long as you don't use Versions simultaneously on multiple machines, we're absolutely cool if you use the same license code on several machines as long as those are all machines belonging or primarily used by the same person. Our assumption was that people would try to use the same license code on several of their personal machines anyway, the language in the license agreement is there so there can be no doubt that we have the right to block license codes that are being (ab)used excessively. Please drop me a line, or follow-up here, if you have further questions about the EULA. Thanks :) - Dirk Stoop Sofa / Versions On Nov 17, 5:44 pm, Hugues Lismonde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Same here... If I have to shell out 39€ per machine, I'd rather buy > Cornerstone at 54€, more features and up to 2 computers (not perfect > but much better). > > Hugues > On 17 Nov 2008, at 17:37, Jeff wrote: > > > > > I absolutely agree. I rotate between 2 machines, only working on > > one at a time. I'll purchase one license for myself, for my laptop, > > but I refuse to purchase a second license for the two or three times > > a week I need to use my desktop machine. > > > This is disappointing. I was expecting to purchase multiple user > > licenses for my company when Versions was released. Instead, > > I'm going to recommend that we standardize on a different > > package instead. I can't justify 2-3x the cost per developer. > > > Best of luck, it's a great product - but understand that you're going > > to lose a lot of potential licenses by trying to force people to > > but multiple licenses. > > > Jeff --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Paid but didnt receive licence
Hey Robert, Please be patient, you will receive your license when the server is recovered in half an hour or so... If not let us know through the contact page... Kindest regards, Koen Bok - madebysofa.com On Nov 17, 5:35 pm, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Im guessing its due to lots of people whacking their website at the > moment, but I paid for Versions just now and never received any > licence email from Sofa. Tried putting my email in their site on the > page where it offers to resend licence details but it says my email > address doesnt exist! > > I then tried contacting Sofa through their contact page, but it gives > a 500 server error! > > Im glad to see Versions is popular enough to cause these server issues > but hope they get it sorted soon. > > Anyone know an email address i should send a message to? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: License Agreement --- Only 1 install???
Same here... If I have to shell out 39€ per machine, I'd rather buy Cornerstone at 54€, more features and up to 2 computers (not perfect but much better). Hugues On 17 Nov 2008, at 17:37, Jeff wrote: > > I absolutely agree. I rotate between 2 machines, only working on > one at a time. I'll purchase one license for myself, for my laptop, > but I refuse to purchase a second license for the two or three times > a week I need to use my desktop machine. > > This is disappointing. I was expecting to purchase multiple user > licenses for my company when Versions was released. Instead, > I'm going to recommend that we standardize on a different > package instead. I can't justify 2-3x the cost per developer. > > Best of luck, it's a great product - but understand that you're going > to lose a lot of potential licenses by trying to force people to > but multiple licenses. > > Jeff > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Version out of beta?
Hey everybody, Glad to see that the pricing policy. Only 1-install isn't a concern for me because I use my laptop for everything but I do think it is something to rethink. I'd say that in general two installs would be great. Although I like most of the new features added with this 1.0 release I also have some concerns: For some reason versions now prompts me every other 10 minutes or so to authenticate for a repository. This is really annoying... The new inspector window just doesn't feel rightly positioned there. I much rather have a floating property window or a horizontally positioned window at the top just below the toolbar that animates down. This current view isn't wide enough to show my external paths and the folder icon is really ugly around the edges. I also would like to suggest a hide button on the window itself. Another thing I would really love to see improved is toggling between changed view and show all view. If you have a file under selection in the changed view and you hit show all it is very likely that you have to scroll down quite a bit again to see the file/folder you were inspecting in the changed view. I really like the addition of the numbers showing local/remote changes but I really dislike their color. It really much rather have 2 numbers without the color.. The changed/all buttons on tiger still aren't identical to those of timeline, browse, history. This might all sound a little harsh but for me personally it feels that these last features were added a bit to quickly. I'm also still hoping for merge/branch support. I'll surely buy a license because versions is clearly superior to all other clients out there for the mac but would like to emphasize that a lot can be improved to make it an even more kick ass product. Kind regards, Marijn On Nov 17, 5:14 pm, "Gary L. Gray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > They have a shiny new web site up at: > > http://www.versionsapp.com/ > > and the link to buy doesn't work there either. Though it does say that > it is €39 (currently about 49 US dollars), so now we know the price. > With a 10% discount, I am looking at $45, which isn't bad. > > -- Gary > > On Nov 17, 2008, at 11:07 AM, Dave DeLong wrote: > > > > > I wouldn't be surprised if their server is getting hammered pretty > > hard. > > > I likewise will be buying a license as soon as I can. > > > Dave > > > On Nov 17, 2008, at 9:04 AM, gemmazoejones wrote: > > >> The link is definitely not working. > > >> Please sort it out asap and I'll be getting a license. > > >> Gemma > > >> On 17 Nov 2008, at 16:01, Paul Willis wrote: > > >>> Hi > > >>> I just had an email from Beanstalk, where I had registered for a > >>> free > >>> account, offering me a 10% discount off cost of Versions now it is > >>> out > >>> of beta. > > >>> I see on the front of the Versions website >>>www.versionsapp.com/ > a buy now button marked with the price of €39 (euros) > > >>> Unfortunately neither the ink from the website or the one in the > >>> Beanstalk email are working. > > >>> Paul --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Paid but didnt receive licence
Thanks Koen. No problem. Thanks for getting back to me so quickly. Robert On Nov 18, 5:37 am, Sofa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey Robert, > > Please be patient, you will receive your license when the server is > recovered in half an hour or so... > > If not let us know through the contact page... > > Kindest regards, > > Koen Bok - madebysofa.com > > On Nov 17, 5:35 pm, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Im guessing its due to lots of people whacking their website at the > > moment, but I paid for Versions just now and never received any > > licence email from Sofa. Tried putting my email in their site on the > > page where it offers to resend licence details but it says my email > > address doesnt exist! > > > I then tried contacting Sofa through their contact page, but it gives > > a 500 server error! > > > Im glad to see Versions is popular enough to cause these server issues > > but hope they get it sorted soon. > > > Anyone know an email address i should send a message to? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: License not working, support form failing
Hey Jeff, Indeed our servers are running hot :-( Could you try again in an hour and let me know if it worked? Kindest regards, Koen Bok - madebysofa.com On Nov 17, 5:38 pm, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I purchased a single license, received it via email, and attempted to > install it. It doesn't work - I'm getting an "Invalid machine ID" > error when I try and register. > > Anyone else see this? I suspect that the servers may just be > overwhelmed... > > Jeff --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
License not working, support form failing
I purchased a single license, received it via email, and attempted to install it. It doesn't work - I'm getting an "Invalid machine ID" error when I try and register. Anyone else see this? I suspect that the servers may just be overwhelmed... Jeff --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: License Agreement --- Only 1 install???
I absolutely agree. I rotate between 2 machines, only working on one at a time. I'll purchase one license for myself, for my laptop, but I refuse to purchase a second license for the two or three times a week I need to use my desktop machine. This is disappointing. I was expecting to purchase multiple user licenses for my company when Versions was released. Instead, I'm going to recommend that we standardize on a different package instead. I can't justify 2-3x the cost per developer. Best of luck, it's a great product - but understand that you're going to lose a lot of potential licenses by trying to force people to but multiple licenses. Jeff --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Paid but didnt receive licence
Im guessing its due to lots of people whacking their website at the moment, but I paid for Versions just now and never received any licence email from Sofa. Tried putting my email in their site on the page where it offers to resend licence details but it says my email address doesnt exist! I then tried contacting Sofa through their contact page, but it gives a 500 server error! Im glad to see Versions is popular enough to cause these server issues but hope they get it sorted soon. Anyone know an email address i should send a message to? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Font
Anyone have any ideas what font the word Versions is in on the new site? I'm really digging the font. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Version out of beta?
They have a shiny new web site up at: http://www.versionsapp.com/ and the link to buy doesn't work there either. Though it does say that it is €39 (currently about 49 US dollars), so now we know the price. With a 10% discount, I am looking at $45, which isn't bad. -- Gary On Nov 17, 2008, at 11:07 AM, Dave DeLong wrote: > > I wouldn't be surprised if their server is getting hammered pretty > hard. > > I likewise will be buying a license as soon as I can. > > Dave > > On Nov 17, 2008, at 9:04 AM, gemmazoejones wrote: > >> >> The link is definitely not working. >> >> Please sort it out asap and I'll be getting a license. >> >> Gemma >> >> On 17 Nov 2008, at 16:01, Paul Willis wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> I just had an email from Beanstalk, where I had registered for a >>> free >>> account, offering me a 10% discount off cost of Versions now it is >>> out >>> of beta. >>> >>> I see on the front of the Versions website >> www.versionsapp.com/ a buy now button marked with the price of €39 (euros) >>> >>> Unfortunately neither the ink from the website or the one in the >>> Beanstalk email are working. >>> >>> Paul >> >> >>> > > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
License Agreement --- Only 1 install???
Well I was ready you buy up my copy of Versions, until I read that it will cost me $50 PER Computer. I don't know about other people's setup, but I have a Mac at work, home and a laptop for everything in between. I work on the same projects on all 3, all 3 for the same business and same user. But there's no way I'm dropping $150 just to have versions available on all 3. I'm a small start-up with only one other person working here, and he has the same setup... thereby doubling our triple cost already. I would strongly urge you to reconsider your license agreement and that it should be one license per USER and not per computer. I'm sorry, but this was a deal breaker. Good luck to ya'll! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
