[Vo]:A clue about Storms' mystery radiation?
This story from Purdue is of interest for several unexplained energy phenomenon, including LENR and the recent disclosure of Ed Storms. That disclosure is suggestive a hidden kind of radiation which accelerates nuclear decay rates. http://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2012/Q3/new-system-could-predict-sol ar-flares,-give-advance-warning.html A known variety of radiation which can alter decay rates is neutrinos, except for the huge problem that neutrinos should not be detected or absorbed in anywhere close to the needed amount. The undefined radiation is associated with solar flares but precedes the flare. However, since neutrinos are always present in a massive flux that is relatively independent of flares, but would not be absorbed in anything like the proportions which are required to alter decay- does this finding not specifically suggest a new kind of radiation which renders neutrinos more active (absorbable)? I think that it does suggest this or something similar, but the University Researchers involved will not go that far. (as Mel Brooks sez: we have to protect our phony baloney jobs). To me, this finding suggests that the standard neutrino flux, which is a given, can be modulated or altered somehow, so as to be absorbed at many or orders of magnitude higher rates, when the mystery radiation is present (compared to normal). That radiation can be produced in LENR apparently, as well as in the solar corona. (note: the flare is a corona feature, which is a bit different than a solar feature). In short, this mystery radiation would operate like the A-B effect - except with respect to the neutrino flux instead of with respect to charged particles. It could even be called a neutrino Aharonov-Bohm effect. QUOTE: Researchers have recorded data during 10 solar flares since 2006, seeing the same patternWe have repeatedly seen a precursor signal preceding a solar flare, Fischbach said. We think this has predictive value. attachment: winmail.dat
Re: [Vo]:A clue about Storms' mystery radiation?
Jones, do you have an estimate of the actual per cent increase of the total neutrino flux that occurs during a flare as compared to the normal flux? I would expect the increase to be virtually un measurable unless there is something interesting going on within the Sun's center where copious amounts of neutrinos are produced. Is a solar flare more than a very tiny disruption of the average solar environment? Dave -Original Message- From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Mon, Nov 19, 2012 11:51 am Subject: [Vo]:A clue about Storms' mystery radiation? This story from Purdue is of interest for several unexplained energy phenomenon, including LENR and the recent disclosure of Ed Storms. That disclosure is suggestive a hidden kind of radiation which accelerates nuclear decay rates. http://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2012/Q3/new-system-could-predict-sol ar-flares,-give-advance-warning.html A known variety of radiation which can alter decay rates is neutrinos, except for the huge problem that neutrinos should not be detected or absorbed in anywhere close to the needed amount. The undefined radiation is associated with solar flares but precedes the flare. However, since neutrinos are always present in a massive flux that is relatively independent of flares, but would not be absorbed in anything like the proportions which are required to alter decay- does this finding not specifically suggest a new kind of radiation which renders neutrinos more active (absorbable)? I think that it does suggest this or something similar, but the University Researchers involved will not go that far. (as Mel Brooks sez: we have to protect our phony baloney jobs). To me, this finding suggests that the standard neutrino flux, which is a given, can be modulated or altered somehow, so as to be absorbed at many or orders of magnitude higher rates, when the mystery radiation is present (compared to normal). That radiation can be produced in LENR apparently, as well as in the solar corona. (note: the flare is a corona feature, which is a bit different than a solar feature). In short, this mystery radiation would operate like the A-B effect - except with respect to the neutrino flux instead of with respect to charged particles. It could even be called a neutrino Aharonov-Bohm effect. QUOTE: Researchers have recorded data during 10 solar flares since 2006, seeing the same patternWe have repeatedly seen a precursor signal preceding a solar flare, Fischbach said. We think this has predictive value.
Re: [Vo]:A clue about Storms' mystery radiation?
Jones, I believe the Elliptical CMEs you see on the sun are made up of orbiting dark matter around the nucleus of the sun, which is also dark matter. They trigger beta decay in their surroundings, breaking up the hydrogen into protons, electrons and creating neutrinos. The elliptical CME arc at the sun is the same orbital arc the particles create on Earth while orbiting and creating low pressure systems in the atmosphere and beta decay in the Earth. Hurricane Sandy was an orbiting particle with a mass of approx 1x10e17 kg. Its beta decay triggered the large sinkhole in the Erie Canal as did Hurricane Isaac particle and the Bayou Corne sinkhole. http://astro.berkeley.edu/~mwhite/darkmatter/hdm.html http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.4165 On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: This story from Purdue is of interest for several unexplained energy phenomenon, including LENR and the recent disclosure of Ed Storms. That disclosure is suggestive a hidden kind of radiation which accelerates nuclear decay rates. http://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2012/Q3/new-system-could-predict-sol ar-flares,-give-advance-warning.html A known variety of radiation which can alter decay rates is neutrinos, except for the huge problem that neutrinos should not be detected or absorbed in anywhere close to the needed amount. The undefined radiation is associated with solar flares but precedes the flare. However, since neutrinos are always present in a massive flux that is relatively independent of flares, but would not be absorbed in anything like the proportions which are required to alter decay- does this finding not specifically suggest a new kind of radiation which renders neutrinos more active (absorbable)? I think that it does suggest this or something similar, but the University Researchers involved will not go that far. (as Mel Brooks sez: we have to protect our phony baloney jobs). To me, this finding suggests that the standard neutrino flux, which is a given, can be modulated or altered somehow, so as to be absorbed at many or orders of magnitude higher rates, when the mystery radiation is present (compared to normal). That radiation can be produced in LENR apparently, as well as in the solar corona. (note: the flare is a corona feature, which is a bit different than a solar feature). In short, this mystery radiation would operate like the A-B effect - except with respect to the neutrino flux instead of with respect to charged particles. It could even be called a neutrino Aharonov-Bohm effect. QUOTE: Researchers have recorded data during 10 solar flares since 2006, seeing the same patternWe have repeatedly seen a precursor signal preceding a solar flare, Fischbach said. We think this has predictive value.
RE: [Vo]:A clue about Storms' mystery radiation?
Yes, this is exactly the point. The solar neutrino rate does not vary noticeably due to flares. Instead another kind of radiation precedes flares, and is measureable on earth as accelerated decay rates. This new kind of radiation could possibly correspond to what Storms describes. The radiation itself would not need to be measureable in its own right - only its effect on the neutrino flux. Thus, the close analogy to the Aharonov-Bohm effect. From: David Roberson Jones, do you have an estimate of the actual per cent increase of the total neutrino flux that occurs during a flare as compared to the normal flux? I would expect the increase to be virtually un measurable unless there is something interesting going on within the Sun's center where copious amounts of neutrinos are produced. Is a solar flare more than a very tiny disruption of the average solar environment? Dave -Original Message- From: Jones Beene This story from Purdue is of interest for several unexplained energy phenomenon, including LENR and the recent disclosure of Ed Storms. That disclosure is suggestive a hidden kind of radiation which accelerates nuclear decay rates. http://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2012/Q3/new-system-could-predict-sol ar-flares,-give-advance-warning.html A known variety of radiation which can alter decay rates is neutrinos, except for the huge problem that neutrinos should not be detected or absorbed in anywhere close to the needed amount. The undefined radiation is associated with solar flares but precedes the flare. However, since neutrinos are always present in a massive flux that is relatively independent of flares, but would not be absorbed in anything like the proportions which are required to alter decay- does this finding not specifically suggest a new kind of radiation which renders neutrinos more active (absorbable)? I think that it does suggest this or something similar, but the University Researchers involved will not go that far. (as Mel Brooks sez: we have to protect our phony baloney jobs). To me, this finding suggests that the standard neutrino flux, which is a given, can be modulated or altered somehow, so as to be absorbed at many or orders of magnitude higher rates, when the mystery radiation is present (compared to normal). That radiation can be produced in LENR apparently, as well as in the solar corona. (note: the flare is a corona feature, which is a bit different than a solar feature). In short, this mystery radiation would operate like the A-B effect - except with respect to the neutrino flux instead of with respect to charged particles. It could even be called a neutrino Aharonov-Bohm effect. QUOTE: Researchers have recorded data during 10 solar flares since 2006, seeing the same patternWe have repeatedly seen a precursor signal preceding a solar flare, Fischbach said. We think this has predictive value.
RE: [Vo]:A clue about Storms' mystery radiation?
Hi - I'm confused by your references. These two citations appear to be incompatible. The Berkeley paper suggests neutrinos and dark matter are identical or else neutrinos are an energetic subset of dark matter. However, neutrinos cannot orbit anything since they have no charge or magnetic susceptibility and only miniscule mass. Presumably, they move in a near straight line at c. most of the time. How can a massive particle be composed of nearly mass-less neutrinos, and how could they orbit anything or appear to have a very large collective mass? From: ChemE Stewart [mailto:cheme...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 9:04 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:A clue about Storms' mystery radiation? Jones, I believe the Elliptical CMEs you see on the sun are made up of orbiting dark matter around the nucleus of the sun, which is also dark matter. They trigger beta decay in their surroundings, breaking up the hydrogen into protons, electrons and creating neutrinos. The elliptical CME arc at the sun is the same orbital arc the particles create on Earth while orbiting and creating low pressure systems in the atmosphere and beta decay in the Earth. Hurricane Sandy was an orbiting particle with a mass of approx 1x10e17 kg. Its beta decay triggered the large sinkhole in the Erie Canal as did Hurricane Isaac particle and the Bayou Corne sinkhole. http://astro.berkeley.edu/~mwhite/darkmatter/hdm.html http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.4165 On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: This story from Purdue is of interest for several unexplained energy phenomenon, including LENR and the recent disclosure of Ed Storms. That disclosure is suggestive a hidden kind of radiation which accelerates nuclear decay rates. http://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2012/Q3/new-system-could-predict-sol http://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2012/Q3/new-system-could-predict-so l%0d%0aar-flares,-give-advance-warning.html ar-flares,-give-advance-warning.html A known variety of radiation which can alter decay rates is neutrinos, except for the huge problem that neutrinos should not be detected or absorbed in anywhere close to the needed amount. The undefined radiation is associated with solar flares but precedes the flare. However, since neutrinos are always present in a massive flux that is relatively independent of flares, but would not be absorbed in anything like the proportions which are required to alter decay- does this finding not specifically suggest a new kind of radiation which renders neutrinos more active (absorbable)? I think that it does suggest this or something similar, but the University Researchers involved will not go that far. (as Mel Brooks sez: we have to protect our phony baloney jobs). To me, this finding suggests that the standard neutrino flux, which is a given, can be modulated or altered somehow, so as to be absorbed at many or orders of magnitude higher rates, when the mystery radiation is present (compared to normal). That radiation can be produced in LENR apparently, as well as in the solar corona. (note: the flare is a corona feature, which is a bit different than a solar feature). In short, this mystery radiation would operate like the A-B effect - except with respect to the neutrino flux instead of with respect to charged particles. It could even be called a neutrino Aharonov-Bohm effect. QUOTE: Researchers have recorded data during 10 solar flares since 2006, seeing the same patternWe have repeatedly seen a precursor signal preceding a solar flare, Fischbach said. We think this has predictive value.
Re: [Vo]:Supersonic shockwave acceleration processes
iYes, of course! The weak interaction, which essentially disappears at a distance of around 10^-17m, provides many orders of magnitude greater force than does gravitation at scales of 10^3m. This is why a gremlin travelling at speeds orders of magnitude above escape velocity, is able to avoid escape from the earth as it orbits through the earth. It also explains why this Kepler orbit of the gremlin is locked to the rotation of the earth so as to keep the geographic intersection points to the surface of the earth effects more or less constant. No other orbital system but geostationary orbit is so locked to the rotation of the earth because those orbits are more than 10^-17m from earth and therefore cannot enjoy the sizzling juicy smoked flavor, dare I say charm of hamburger that has benefitted from helpers such fermionic fiesta cheese sauce. On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:46 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote: Weak interactions are most noticeable when particles undergo beta decayhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_decay, and in the production of deuterium and then helium from hydrogen that powers the sun's thermonuclear process. At the center of every Sun and planet is dark matter. The only difference between a Sun and a planet is the size and gravitational pull of the dark matter nucleus. A sun's pull is great enough to initiate Nuclear Fusion on a grand scale. The gas giants in our solar system all have a dark matter nucleus/LENR reactor at their center creating Hydrogen, Helium and Deuterium, etc. Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars' reactor is tuckered out from ages of dark matter annihilation from being closer to the sun and getting pelted. Stewart darkmattersalot.com On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:28 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote: *weakly interacting massive particles* or *WIMPs*, are particles serving as one possible solution to the dark matterhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter problem. These particles interact through the weak forcehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_interaction and gravity http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity, and possibly through other interactions no stronger than the weak force. Because they do not interact with electromagnetism they cannot be seen directly, and because they do not interact with the strong nuclear forcehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strong_interaction they do not react strongly with atomic nuclei. On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:24 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.comwrote: They weakly react via gravity, that is all they need. You can keep the hamburgers. On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:18 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.comwrote: I still think you're barking up the wrong tree with this dark matter stuff. Clearly, the only substance that can orbit the earth at a velocity orders of magnitude above escape velocity, as you posit it must, is hamburger. Why do I say this? Because in order to overcome the tendency to take off on a hyperbolic trajectory, the substance must have a helper. On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:08 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.comwrote: Axil, One thing I have noticed in my dark matter model for a particle is that when a dark matter nucleus is subject to more dense matter on one side of it (i.e. water), it converts the matter to energy and shoots it out the opposite side in order to have equilibrium on both sides, like a...comet nucleus does with it's ion tail. That bow/shock wave is also what I believe is leading to many massive fish/mammal kills underwater by these particles when they are orbiting around us and into the Earth. Lastly, there is a crazy guy on his blog saying that he solved the Bermuda Triangle mystery, something about orbiting weakly interacting massive particles, contrails and sucking in airplanes. http://darkmattersalot.com Stewart On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: “In LeClairs later experiment where there are score lines across the surface of metal, I suspect that there is a second self sustaining effect, possibly involving bow waves and casimir forces, although I was not left totally convinced by LeClair's casimir force explanation. Whatever it is, it seems that the presence of the metal/water surface is important for this second effect to be self sustaining. It appears that there is feedback which results in the projectile neither burrowing into the metal or leaving the metal surface. I feel there is a clue here somewhere” The self-sustaining structure that preserves the positive water ionic crystal is a plasmoid. A plasmoid is a coil of negative and positive electric currents that form a ball with the positive ions on the inside and the negative electrons on the outside. The plasmoid is self-sustaining as it converts LENR reaction energy into electromagnetic current flow. The tendency of electrons to flow along the surface of a metal would keep the plasmoid from
Re: [Vo]:A clue about Storms' mystery radiation?
Big brother
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particles
On Monday, November 19, 2012, Jones Beene wrote:
Hi - I’m confused by your references. These two citations appear to be
incompatible. The Berkeley paper suggests neutrinos and dark matter are
identical or else neutrinos are an energetic subset of dark matter.
However, neutrinos cannot “orbit” anything since they have no charge or
magnetic susceptibility and only miniscule mass. Presumably, they move in a
near straight line at c. most of the time.
** **
How can a massive “particle” be composed of nearly mass-less neutrinos,
and how could they orbit anything or appear to have a very large collective
mass?
** **
** **
*From:* ChemE Stewart [mailto:cheme...@gmail.com javascript:_e({},
'cvml', 'cheme...@gmail.com');]
*Sent:* Monday, November 19, 2012 9:04 AM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'vortex-l@eskimo.com');
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:A clue about Storms' mystery radiation?
** **
Jones,
** **
I believe the Elliptical CMEs you see on the sun are made up of orbiting
dark matter around the nucleus of the sun, which is also dark matter. They
trigger beta decay in their surroundings, breaking up the hydrogen into
protons, electrons and creating neutrinos. The elliptical CME arc at the
sun is the same orbital arc the particles create on Earth while orbiting
and creating low pressure systems in the atmosphere and beta decay in the
Earth. Hurricane Sandy was an orbiting particle with a mass of approx
1x10e17 kg. Its beta decay triggered the large sinkhole in the Erie Canal
as did Hurricane Isaac particle and the Bayou Corne sinkhole.
** **
http://astro.berkeley.edu/~mwhite/darkmatter/hdm.html
http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.4165
** **
** **
** **
** **
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
This story from Purdue is of interest for several
unexplained energy phenomenon, including LENR and the recent disclosure of
Ed Storms. That disclosure is suggestive a hidden kind of radiation which
accelerates nuclear decay rates.
http://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2012/Q3/new-system-could-predict-sol
ar-flares,-give-advance-warning.htmlhttp://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2012/Q3/new-system-could-predict-sol%0d%0aar-flares,-give-advance-warning.html
A known variety of radiation which can alter decay rates is
neutrinos, except for the huge problem that neutrinos should not be
detected
or absorbed in anywhere close to the needed amount.
The undefined radiation is associated with solar flares but
precedes the flare. However, since neutrinos are always present in a
massive
flux that is relatively independent of flares, but would not be absorbed in
anything like the proportions which are required to alter decay- does this
finding not specifically suggest a new kind of radiation which renders
neutrinos more active (absorbable)?
I think that it does suggest this or something similar, but
the University Researchers involved will not go that far. (as Mel Brooks
sez: we have to protect our phony baloney jobs).
To me, this finding suggests that the standard neutrino
flux, which is a given, can be modulated or altered somehow, so as to be
absorbed at many or orders of magnitude higher rates, when the mystery
radiation is present (compared to normal). That radiation can be produced
in
LENR apparently, as well as in the solar corona. (note: the flare is a
corona feature, which is a bit different than a solar feature).
In short, this mystery radiation would opera
Re: [Vo]:Supersonic shockwave acceleration processes
Stick to cooking hamburgers. You make much more sense in your field of knowledge local WIMP speed distribution is known (Maxwellian with vc=220 km/s) http://conferences.fnal.gov/dmwksp/Talks/AGreen.pdf fits great with my orbital model speed and mass of a massive collapsed particle I have supplied plenty of predictions as to location and detection for you/others to prove me wrong. I have also supplied plenty of observations that fit. I suggest you camp out near an actively growing sinkhole and cook your hamburgers on your beta decay grill. On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:42 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote: iYes, of course! The weak interaction, which essentially disappears at a distance of around 10^-17m, provides many orders of magnitude greater force than does gravitation at scales of 10^3m. This is why a gremlin travelling at speeds orders of magnitude above escape velocity, is able to avoid escape from the earth as it orbits through the earth. It also explains why this Kepler orbit of the gremlin is locked to the rotation of the earth so as to keep the geographic intersection points to the surface of the earth effects more or less constant. No other orbital system but geostationary orbit is so locked to the rotation of the earth because those orbits are more than 10^-17m from earth and therefore cannot enjoy the sizzling juicy smoked flavor, dare I say charm of hamburger that has benefitted from helpers such fermionic fiesta cheese sauce. On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:46 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote: Weak interactions are most noticeable when particles undergo beta decayhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_decay, and in the production of deuterium and then helium from hydrogen that powers the sun's thermonuclear process. At the center of every Sun and planet is dark matter. The only difference between a Sun and a planet is the size and gravitational pull of the dark matter nucleus. A sun's pull is great enough to initiate Nuclear Fusion on a grand scale. The gas giants in our solar system all have a dark matter nucleus/LENR reactor at their center creating Hydrogen, Helium and Deuterium, etc. Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars' reactor is tuckered out from ages of dark matter annihilation from being closer to the sun and getting pelted. Stewart darkmattersalot.com On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:28 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.comwrote: *weakly interacting massive particles* or *WIMPs*, are particles serving as one possible solution to the dark matterhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter problem. These particles interact through the weak forcehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_interaction and gravity http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity, and possibly through other interactions no stronger than the weak force. Because they do not interact with electromagnetism they cannot be seen directly, and because they do not interact with the strong nuclear forcehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strong_interaction they do not react strongly with atomic nuclei. On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:24 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.comwrote: They weakly react via gravity, that is all they need. You can keep the hamburgers. On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:18 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.comwrote: I still think you're barking up the wrong tree with this dark matter stuff. Clearly, the only substance that can orbit the earth at a velocity orders of magnitude above escape velocity, as you posit it must, is hamburger. Why do I say this? Because in order to overcome the tendency to take off on a hyperbolic trajectory, the substance must have a helper. On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:08 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.comwrote: Axil, One thing I have noticed in my dark matter model for a particle is that when a dark matter nucleus is subject to more dense matter on one side of it (i.e. water), it converts the matter to energy and shoots it out the opposite side in order to have equilibrium on both sides, like a...comet nucleus does with it's ion tail. That bow/shock wave is also what I believe is leading to many massive fish/mammal kills underwater by these particles when they are orbiting around us and into the Earth. Lastly, there is a crazy guy on his blog saying that he solved the Bermuda Triangle mystery, something about orbiting weakly interacting massive particles, contrails and sucking in airplanes. http://darkmattersalot.com Stewart On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.comwrote: “In LeClairs later experiment where there are score lines across the surface of metal, I suspect that there is a second self sustaining effect, possibly involving bow waves and casimir forces, although I was not left totally convinced by LeClair's casimir force explanation. Whatever it is, it seems that the presence of the metal/water surface is important for this second effect to be self sustaining. It
Re: [Vo]:A clue about Storms' mystery radiation?
In the early 1990's, physicist Ken Shoulders received five patents for his discovery of the High Density Charge Cluster (HDCC), a relatively discrete, self-contained, negatively-charged, high-density state of matter (a bundle of electrons that) appears to be produced by the application of a high electrical field between a cathode and an anode (i.e. 2-10 kV at the tip of a sharply pointed electrode). It can also be described as 'a spherical mono pole oscillator'. Shoulders has given it the name 'Electrum Validium' (EV), meaning strong electron. EVs have been credited with accomplishing CF transmutations. Ken Shoulders invented also a method of Plasma-Injected Transmutation for the remediation of nuclear waste by EVs, and has demonstrated the complete elimination of radioactivity in high-level nuclear material. See: Kenneth Shoulders, US Patents #5018180, #5054047, #5123039 and #5148461 EVs apparently function as a collective accelerator with sufficient energy to inject a large group of nuclei into a target and promote nuclear cluster reactions. The composition of EVs allows for the inclusion of some 1,000,000 nuclides. Ions can be added to EVs until the net charge becomes positive. Such EVs are called Nuclide-EVs (NEVs). According to shoulders: The NEV acts as an ultra-massive, negative ion with high charge-to-mass ratio. This provides the function of a simple nuclear accelerator. Such nuclear reactions are fundamentally an event involving large numbers, and not one of widely isolated events working at an atomic level. Shoulders offers an ad hoc explanation of these results as being due largely to a nuclear cluster reaction having an unknown form of coherence. Ed Storms crack experiment may be forming high charge separation within the crack near or at the site of transmutation that will accelerate nuclear reactions rates. Cheers:axil On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: This story from Purdue is of interest for several unexplained energy phenomenon, including LENR and the recent disclosure of Ed Storms. That disclosure is suggestive a hidden kind of radiation which accelerates nuclear decay rates. http://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2012/Q3/new-system-could-predict-sol ar-flares,-give-advance-warning.htmlhttp://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2012/Q3/new-system-could-predict-solar-flares,-give-advance-warning.html A known variety of radiation which can alter decay rates is neutrinos, except for the huge problem that neutrinos should not be detected or absorbed in anywhere close to the needed amount. The undefined radiation is associated with solar flares but precedes the flare. However, since neutrinos are always present in a massive flux that is relatively independent of flares, but would not be absorbed in anything like the proportions which are required to alter decay- does this finding not specifically suggest a new kind of radiation which renders neutrinos more active (absorbable)? I think that it does suggest this or something similar, but the University Researchers involved will not go that far. (as Mel Brooks sez: we have to protect our phony baloney jobs). To me, this finding suggests that the standard neutrino flux, which is a given, can be modulated or altered somehow, so as to be absorbed at many or orders of magnitude higher rates, when the mystery radiation is present (compared to normal). That radiation can be produced in LENR apparently, as well as in the solar corona. (note: the flare is a corona feature, which is a bit different than a solar feature). In short, this mystery radiation would operate like the A-B effect - except with respect to the neutrino flux instead of with respect to charged particles. It could even be called a neutrino Aharonov-Bohm effect. QUOTE: Researchers have recorded data during 10 solar flares since 2006, seeing the same patternWe have repeatedly seen a precursor signal preceding a solar flare, Fischbach said. We think this has predictive value.
Re: [Vo]:Supersonic shockwave acceleration processes
My, Goodness! You'd better get over there to Wolfram's model of WIMP Orbiting Inside Earth http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/WIMPOrbitingInsideEarth/ And tell them to fix their units labeling. If one were a hamburger helper physicist, one might be led to believe that the speed unit was m/s rather than km/s! On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:09 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote: Stick to cooking hamburgers. You make much more sense in your field of knowledge local WIMP speed distribution is known (Maxwellian with vc=220 km/s) http://conferences.fnal.gov/dmwksp/Talks/AGreen.pdf fits great with my orbital model speed and mass of a massive collapsed particle I have supplied plenty of predictions as to location and detection for you/others to prove me wrong. I have also supplied plenty of observations that fit. I suggest you camp out near an actively growing sinkhole and cook your hamburgers on your beta decay grill. On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:42 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote: iYes, of course! The weak interaction, which essentially disappears at a distance of around 10^-17m, provides many orders of magnitude greater force than does gravitation at scales of 10^3m. This is why a gremlin travelling at speeds orders of magnitude above escape velocity, is able to avoid escape from the earth as it orbits through the earth. It also explains why this Kepler orbit of the gremlin is locked to the rotation of the earth so as to keep the geographic intersection points to the surface of the earth effects more or less constant. No other orbital system but geostationary orbit is so locked to the rotation of the earth because those orbits are more than 10^-17m from earth and therefore cannot enjoy the sizzling juicy smoked flavor, dare I say charm of hamburger that has benefitted from helpers such fermionic fiesta cheese sauce. On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:46 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.comwrote: Weak interactions are most noticeable when particles undergo beta decayhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_decay, and in the production of deuterium and then helium from hydrogen that powers the sun's thermonuclear process. At the center of every Sun and planet is dark matter. The only difference between a Sun and a planet is the size and gravitational pull of the dark matter nucleus. A sun's pull is great enough to initiate Nuclear Fusion on a grand scale. The gas giants in our solar system all have a dark matter nucleus/LENR reactor at their center creating Hydrogen, Helium and Deuterium, etc. Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars' reactor is tuckered out from ages of dark matter annihilation from being closer to the sun and getting pelted. Stewart darkmattersalot.com On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:28 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.comwrote: *weakly interacting massive particles* or *WIMPs*, are particles serving as one possible solution to the dark matterhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter problem. These particles interact through the weak forcehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_interaction and gravity http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity, and possibly through other interactions no stronger than the weak force. Because they do not interact with electromagnetism they cannot be seen directly, and because they do not interact with the strong nuclear forcehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strong_interaction they do not react strongly with atomic nuclei. On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:24 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.comwrote: They weakly react via gravity, that is all they need. You can keep the hamburgers. On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:18 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.comwrote: I still think you're barking up the wrong tree with this dark matter stuff. Clearly, the only substance that can orbit the earth at a velocity orders of magnitude above escape velocity, as you posit it must, is hamburger. Why do I say this? Because in order to overcome the tendency to take off on a hyperbolic trajectory, the substance must have a helper. On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:08 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.comwrote: Axil, One thing I have noticed in my dark matter model for a particle is that when a dark matter nucleus is subject to more dense matter on one side of it (i.e. water), it converts the matter to energy and shoots it out the opposite side in order to have equilibrium on both sides, like a...comet nucleus does with it's ion tail. That bow/shock wave is also what I believe is leading to many massive fish/mammal kills underwater by these particles when they are orbiting around us and into the Earth. Lastly, there is a crazy guy on his blog saying that he solved the Bermuda Triangle mystery, something about orbiting weakly interacting massive particles, contrails and sucking in airplanes. http://darkmattersalot.com Stewart On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.comwrote: “In LeClairs
[Vo]:New article just crying for rebuttal
At Resilience.org (was Energy Bulletin), the article Science's Evil Twin by Ugo Bardi. This piece of trash takes the 'toxic science' approach: http://www.resilience.org/stories/2012-11-19/science-s-evil-twin I have enormous respect for the many contributors at Resilience, but this guy does damage to their image. I dearly want to reply myself but I don't have the depth to pull it off -I am sure I would just look like a demented juvenile fan, and make it worse! Oddly, I am quite sympathetic with the real problem CF will present to the whole (resilience, peak oil, peak everything, de-growth) scene. By re-enabling the endless growth paradigm, CF will hasten (okay, may well hasten) the utter collapse of our civilization. And maybe Dr. Badi sees that. Or maybe he's just another Denier. Anybody up for this? At least go read it... Ol' Bab (Dave Babcock)
Re: [Vo]:Supersonic shockwave acceleration processes
Notice Woflram does not show you the particle mass. Orbits depend on more than just velocity. Also notice that the research does not place a lower limit on mass: If the WIMP is heavy even with optimistic assumptions and large exposures it will only be possible to place a lower limit on its mass Also notice that two body Kepler orbits do not necessarily orbit around the center of mass of either object they orbit a barycenter, which may place their orbit above and below the surface of matter that they weakly interact with. Also notice that if a good portion of your orbit is through a mass that you interact gravitationally with it will attempt to lock you in as opposed to an orbiting satellite in space. Just like the moving ocean mass will attempt to steer you gravitationally. Also notice that your hamburger just disappeared thru beta decay while you were not watching and listening to me. Stewart darkmattersalot.com On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:21 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote: My, Goodness! You'd better get over there to Wolfram's model of WIMP Orbiting Inside Earth http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/WIMPOrbitingInsideEarth/ And tell them to fix their units labeling. If one were a hamburger helper physicist, one might be led to believe that the speed unit was m/s rather than km/s! On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:09 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.comwrote: Stick to cooking hamburgers. You make much more sense in your field of knowledge local WIMP speed distribution is known (Maxwellian with vc=220 km/s) http://conferences.fnal.gov/dmwksp/Talks/AGreen.pdf fits great with my orbital model speed and mass of a massive collapsed particle I have supplied plenty of predictions as to location and detection for you/others to prove me wrong. I have also supplied plenty of observations that fit. I suggest you camp out near an actively growing sinkhole and cook your hamburgers on your beta decay grill. On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:42 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.comwrote: iYes, of course! The weak interaction, which essentially disappears at a distance of around 10^-17m, provides many orders of magnitude greater force than does gravitation at scales of 10^3m. This is why a gremlin travelling at speeds orders of magnitude above escape velocity, is able to avoid escape from the earth as it orbits through the earth. It also explains why this Kepler orbit of the gremlin is locked to the rotation of the earth so as to keep the geographic intersection points to the surface of the earth effects more or less constant. No other orbital system but geostationary orbit is so locked to the rotation of the earth because those orbits are more than 10^-17m from earth and therefore cannot enjoy the sizzling juicy smoked flavor, dare I say charm of hamburger that has benefitted from helpers such fermionic fiesta cheese sauce. On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:46 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.comwrote: Weak interactions are most noticeable when particles undergo beta decayhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_decay, and in the production of deuterium and then helium from hydrogen that powers the sun's thermonuclear process. At the center of every Sun and planet is dark matter. The only difference between a Sun and a planet is the size and gravitational pull of the dark matter nucleus. A sun's pull is great enough to initiate Nuclear Fusion on a grand scale. The gas giants in our solar system all have a dark matter nucleus/LENR reactor at their center creating Hydrogen, Helium and Deuterium, etc. Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars' reactor is tuckered out from ages of dark matter annihilation from being closer to the sun and getting pelted. Stewart darkmattersalot.com On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:28 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.comwrote: *weakly interacting massive particles* or *WIMPs*, are particles serving as one possible solution to the dark matterhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter problem. These particles interact through the weak forcehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_interaction and gravity http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity, and possibly through other interactions no stronger than the weak force. Because they do not interact with electromagnetism they cannot be seen directly, and because they do not interact with the strong nuclear forcehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strong_interaction they do not react strongly with atomic nuclei. On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:24 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.comwrote: They weakly react via gravity, that is all they need. You can keep the hamburgers. On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:18 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.comwrote: I still think you're barking up the wrong tree with this dark matter stuff. Clearly, the only substance that can orbit the earth at a velocity orders of magnitude above escape velocity, as you posit it must, is hamburger. Why do I say this?
[Vo]:Armageddon outta here
With the middle east violence escalating on schedule to coincide with the end of the Mayan calendar I gotta wonder when the proof of LENR will be released so the aliens and illuminatti can finally reveal themselves, for myself I feel the end of the Mayan calendar may only be a side effect of the technology about to be understood where calendars will have to be revamped to include temporal navigation :_) Happy Holidays! Fran
Re: [Vo]:Armageddon outta here
If Armageddon were linked to Mideast violence we would all be long gone. I think the technology is close. With 3 comets in the inner solar system we might be dodging dark matter for awhile. For the next year we will be living dangerously close to those intersecting points on a Feynman particle diagram, with 3 times ? nuclei comet particles orbiting near our sun's particle orbit all intersecting in our part of the galaxy in the span of less than a year. Dark matter annihilates(each other). Lots of carpet bombing of the sun nuclei will chill its dark matter nucleus and cool things off but unleash nasty CMEs. Lot's of carpet bombing of the Earth will create beta decay swiss cheese of matter and lots of atmospheric and Earthly uncertainty... Should be interesting times in the next year or two either way. Stewart darkmattersalot.com On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Roarty, Francis X francis.x.roa...@lmco.com wrote: With the middle east violence escalating on schedule to coincide with the end of the Mayan calendar I gotta wonder when the proof of LENR will be released so the aliens and illuminatti can finally reveal themselves, for myself I feel the end of the Mayan calendar may only be a side effect of the technology about to be understood where calendars will have to be revamped to include temporal navigation :_) Happy Holidays! Fran
Re: [Vo]:Armageddon outta here
Here's a web site to get you through it: http://deoxy.org/ You'll find it to be multi-dimensional and hence, better than the HHGttG. Bring a towel.
Re: [Vo]:Supersonic shockwave acceleration processes
Pop quiz! Kepler is famous for having solved calculus derivation of minima and maxima of a curve when presented with the challenge of finding the optimum shape for a barrel of dill pickles to go with the tasty char broiled hamburgers that history now recognizes as the inspiration for flavour in physics. Kepler is also famous for having found the closed form solution to the two body orbital problem where the mass and velocities of two co-orbiting bodies is known. Given the mass of the earth and the purported orbital speed of the gremlin of thousands of kilometers per second, what is the minimum mass of a gremlin that can result in a maximal orbital velocity of just 1000 kilometers per second? On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:36 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote: Notice Woflram does not show you the particle mass. Orbits depend on more than just velocity. Also notice that the research does not place a lower limit on mass: If the WIMP is heavy even with optimistic assumptions and large exposures it will only be possible to place a lower limit on its mass Also notice that two body Kepler orbits do not necessarily orbit around the center of mass of either object they orbit a barycenter, which may place their orbit above and below the surface of matter that they weakly interact with. Also notice that if a good portion of your orbit is through a mass that you interact gravitationally with it will attempt to lock you in as opposed to an orbiting satellite in space. Just like the moving ocean mass will attempt to steer you gravitationally. Also notice that your hamburger just disappeared thru beta decay while you were not watching and listening to me. Stewart darkmattersalot.com On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:21 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote: My, Goodness! You'd better get over there to Wolfram's model of WIMP Orbiting Inside Earth http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/WIMPOrbitingInsideEarth/ And tell them to fix their units labeling. If one were a hamburger helper physicist, one might be led to believe that the speed unit was m/s rather than km/s! On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:09 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.comwrote: Stick to cooking hamburgers. You make much more sense in your field of knowledge local WIMP speed distribution is known (Maxwellian with vc=220 km/s) http://conferences.fnal.gov/dmwksp/Talks/AGreen.pdf fits great with my orbital model speed and mass of a massive collapsed particle I have supplied plenty of predictions as to location and detection for you/others to prove me wrong. I have also supplied plenty of observations that fit. I suggest you camp out near an actively growing sinkhole and cook your hamburgers on your beta decay grill. On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:42 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.comwrote: iYes, of course! The weak interaction, which essentially disappears at a distance of around 10^-17m, provides many orders of magnitude greater force than does gravitation at scales of 10^3m. This is why a gremlin travelling at speeds orders of magnitude above escape velocity, is able to avoid escape from the earth as it orbits through the earth. It also explains why this Kepler orbit of the gremlin is locked to the rotation of the earth so as to keep the geographic intersection points to the surface of the earth effects more or less constant. No other orbital system but geostationary orbit is so locked to the rotation of the earth because those orbits are more than 10^-17m from earth and therefore cannot enjoy the sizzling juicy smoked flavor, dare I say charm of hamburger that has benefitted from helpers such fermionic fiesta cheese sauce. On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:46 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.comwrote: Weak interactions are most noticeable when particles undergo beta decay http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_decay, and in the production of deuterium and then helium from hydrogen that powers the sun's thermonuclear process. At the center of every Sun and planet is dark matter. The only difference between a Sun and a planet is the size and gravitational pull of the dark matter nucleus. A sun's pull is great enough to initiate Nuclear Fusion on a grand scale. The gas giants in our solar system all have a dark matter nucleus/LENR reactor at their center creating Hydrogen, Helium and Deuterium, etc. Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars' reactor is tuckered out from ages of dark matter annihilation from being closer to the sun and getting pelted. Stewart darkmattersalot.com On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:28 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.comwrote: *weakly interacting massive particles* or *WIMPs*, are particles serving as one possible solution to the dark matterhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter problem. These particles interact through the weak forcehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_interaction and gravity http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity, and
Re: [Vo]:Supersonic shockwave acceleration processes
Read my blog On Monday, November 19, 2012, James Bowery wrote: Pop quiz! Kepler is famous for having solved calculus derivation of minima and maxima of a curve when presented with the challenge of finding the optimum shape for a barrel of dill pickles to go with the tasty char broiled hamburgers that history now recognizes as the inspiration for flavour in physics. Kepler is also famous for having found the closed form solution to the two body orbital problem where the mass and velocities of two co-orbiting bodies is known. Given the mass of the earth and the purported orbital speed of the gremlin of thousands of kilometers per second, what is the minimum mass of a gremlin that can result in a maximal orbital velocity of just 1000 kilometers per second? On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:36 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.comwrote: Notice Woflram does not show you the particle mass. Orbits depend on more than just velocity. Also notice that the research does not place a lower limit on mass: If the WIMP is heavy even with optimistic assumptions and large exposures it will only be possible to place a lower limit on its mass Also notice that two body Kepler orbits do not necessarily orbit around the center of mass of either object they orbit a barycenter, which may place their orbit above and below the surface of matter that they weakly interact with. Also notice that if a good portion of your orbit is through a mass that you interact gravitationally with it will attempt to lock you in as opposed to an orbiting satellite in space. Just like the moving ocean mass will attempt to steer you gravitationally. Also notice that your hamburger just disappeared thru beta decay while you were not watching and listening to me. Stewart darkmattersalot.com On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:21 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote: My, Goodness! You'd better get over there to Wolfram's model of WIMP Orbiting Inside Earth http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/WIMPOrbitingInsideEarth/ And tell them to fix their units labeling. If one were a hamburger helper physicist, one might be led to believe that the speed unit was m/s rather than km/s! On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:09 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.comwrote: Stick to cooking hamburgers. You make much more sense in your field of knowledge local WIMP speed distribution is known (Maxwellian with vc=220 km/s) http://conferences.fnal.gov/dmwksp/Talks/AGreen.pdf fits great with my orbital model speed and mass of a massive collapsed particle I have supplied plenty of predictions as to location and detection for you/others to prove me wrong. I have also supplied plenty of observations that fit. I suggest you camp out near an actively growing sinkhole and cook your hamburgers on your beta decay grill. On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:42 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote: iYes, of course! The weak interaction, which essentially disappears at a distance of around 10^-17m, provides many orders of magnitude greater force than does gravitation at scales of 10^3m. This is why a gremlin travelling at speeds orders of magnitude above escape velocity, is able to avoid escape from the earth as it orbits through the earth. It also explains why this Kepler orbit of the gremlin is locked to the rotation of the earth so as to keep the geographic intersection points to the surface of the earth effects more or less constant. No other orbital system but geostationary orbit is so locked to the rotation of the earth because those orbits are more than 10^-17m from earth and therefore cannot enjoy the sizzling juicy smoked flavor, dare I say charm of hamburger that has benefitted from helpers such fermionic fiesta cheese sauce. On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:46 PM, ChemE Stewart
Re: [Vo]:Supersonic shockwave acceleration processes
I'm sorry, that answer is only a little better than Its in the library somewhere. You get an F. On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:53 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote: Read my blog On Monday, November 19, 2012, James Bowery wrote: Pop quiz! Kepler is famous for having solved calculus derivation of minima and maxima of a curve when presented with the challenge of finding the optimum shape for a barrel of dill pickles to go with the tasty char broiled hamburgers that history now recognizes as the inspiration for flavour in physics. Kepler is also famous for having found the closed form solution to the two body orbital problem where the mass and velocities of two co-orbiting bodies is known. Given the mass of the earth and the purported orbital speed of the gremlin of thousands of kilometers per second, what is the minimum mass of a gremlin that can result in a maximal orbital velocity of just 1000 kilometers per second? On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:36 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.comwrote: Notice Woflram does not show you the particle mass. Orbits depend on more than just velocity. Also notice that the research does not place a lower limit on mass: If the WIMP is heavy even with optimistic assumptions and large exposures it will only be possible to place a lower limit on its mass Also notice that two body Kepler orbits do not necessarily orbit around the center of mass of either object they orbit a barycenter, which may place their orbit above and below the surface of matter that they weakly interact with. Also notice that if a good portion of your orbit is through a mass that you interact gravitationally with it will attempt to lock you in as opposed to an orbiting satellite in space. Just like the moving ocean mass will attempt to steer you gravitationally. Also notice that your hamburger just disappeared thru beta decay while you were not watching and listening to me. Stewart darkmattersalot.com On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:21 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote: My, Goodness! You'd better get over there to Wolfram's model of WIMP Orbiting Inside Earth http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/WIMPOrbitingInsideEarth/ And tell them to fix their units labeling. If one were a hamburger helper physicist, one might be led to believe that the speed unit was m/s rather than km/s! On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:09 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.comwrote: Stick to cooking hamburgers. You make much more sense in your field of knowledge local WIMP speed distribution is known (Maxwellian with vc=220 km/s) http://conferences.fnal.gov/dmwksp/Talks/AGreen.pdf fits great with my orbital model speed and mass of a massive collapsed particle I have supplied plenty of predictions as to location and detection for you/others to prove me wrong. I have also supplied plenty of observations that fit. I suggest you camp out near an actively growing sinkhole and cook your hamburgers on your beta decay grill. On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:42 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.comwrote: iYes, of course! The weak interaction, which essentially disappears at a distance of around 10^-17m, provides many orders of magnitude greater force than does gravitation at scales of 10^3m. This is why a gremlin travelling at speeds orders of magnitude above escape velocity, is able to avoid escape from the earth as it orbits through the earth. It also explains why this Kepler orbit of the gremlin is locked to the rotation of the earth so as to keep the geographic intersection points to the surface of the earth effects more or less constant. No other orbital system but geostationary orbit is so locked to the rotation of the earth because those orbits are more than 10^-17m from earth and therefore cannot enjoy the sizzling juicy smoked flavor, dare I say charm of hamburger that has benefitted from helpers such fermionic fiesta cheese sauce. On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:46 PM, ChemE Stewart
Re: [Vo]:New article just crying for rebuttal
I thought the post was kind of funny. The complaints are the usual ones -- no radiation, lack of reproducibility, not following the scientific method, etc. I think the post is harmless. Eric On Nov 19, 2012, at 10:33, David L Babcock ol...@rochester.rr.com wrote: Anybody up for this? At least go read it... Ol' Bab (Dave Babcock)
Re: [Vo]:Supersonic shockwave acceleration processes
The other thing to note is the particle is in a decaying Earth orbit, not your silly ass Wolfram 1st grade example. On Monday, November 19, 2012, James Bowery wrote: I'm sorry, that answer is only a little better than Its in the library somewhere. You get an F. On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:53 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote: Read my blog On Monday, November 19, 2012, James Bowery wrote: Pop quiz! Kepler is famous for having solved calculus derivation of minima and maxima of a curve when presented with the challenge of finding the optimum shape for a barrel of dill pickles to go with the tasty char broiled hamburgers that history now recognizes as the inspiration for flavour in physics. Kepler is also famous for having found the closed form solution to the two body orbital problem where the mass and velocities of two co-orbiting bodies is known. Given the mass of the earth and the purported orbital speed of the gremlin of thousands of kilometers per second, what is the minimum mass of a gremlin that can result in a maximal orbital velocity of just 1000 kilometers per second? On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:36 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.comwrote: Notice Woflram does not show you the particle mass. Orbits depend on more than just velocity. Also notice that the research does not place a lower limit on mass: If the WIMP is heavy even with optimistic assumptions and large exposures it will only be possible to place a lower limit on its mass Also notice that two body Kepler orbits do not necessarily orbit around the center of mass of either object they orbit a barycenter, which may place their orbit above and below the surface of matter that they weakly interact with. Also notice that if a good portion of your orbit is through a mass that you interact gravitationally with it will attempt to lock you in as opposed to an orbiting satellite in space. Just like the moving ocean mass will attempt to steer you gravitationally. Also notice that your hamburger just disappeared thru beta decay while you were not watching and listening to me. Stewart darkmattersalot.com On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:21 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote: My, Goodness! You'd better get over there to Wolfram's model of WIMP Orbiting Inside Earth http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/WIMPOrbitingInsideEarth/ And tell them to fix their units labeling. If one were a hamburger helper physicist, one might be led to believe that the speed unit was m/s rather than km/s! On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:09 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.comwrote: Stick to cooking hamburgers. You make much more sense in your field of knowledge local WIMP speed distribution is known (Maxwellian with vc=220 km/s) http://conferences.fnal.gov/dmwksp/Talks/AGreen.pdf fits great with my orbital model speed and mass of a massive collapsed particle I have supplied plenty of predictions as to location and detection for you/others to prove me wrong. I have also supplied plenty of observations that fit. I suggest you camp out near an actively growing sinkhole and cook your hamburgers on your beta decay grill. On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:42 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote: iYes, of course! The weak interaction, which essentially disappears at a distance of around 10^-17m, provides many orders of magnitude greater force than does gravitation at scales of 10^3m. This is why a gremlin travelling at speeds orders of magnitude above escape
Re: [Vo]:A clue about Storms' mystery radiation?
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 19 Nov 2012 08:51:20 -0800: Hi, 1. More energetic neutrinos react more strongly with matter. 2. A massive localized fusion reaction somewhere below the surface of the Sun might take a day or so for the energy to reach the surface, and produce a CME. 3. Neutrinos produced during such a reaction would need to be more energetic than those from the p-p reaction, resulting in such neutrinos being more effective at triggering decay reactions on Earth (see #1). 4. Due to their low reaction rate with matter, neutrinos are barely restricted by the mass of the Sun, and reach the Earth just minutes after being created at the locality of the fusion reaction, thus providing a real time indication that the fusion reaction is taking place. 5. I once saw an estimate that it takes 1 years for fusion energy from the core to reach the surface. In which case the fusion reaction I posit here would need to be fairly shallow to reach the surface in just a day. 6. Such a fusion reaction would need to involve heavier elements than Hydrogen to explain the more energetic neutrinos. The Carbon cycle might be a reasonable candidate. (Both 13N 15O have fairly short half lives, so the cycle could proceed rapidly if the starting materials were present - especially if a supply of shrunken Hydrinos were on hand to reduce the tunneling time). This story from Purdue is of interest for several unexplained energy phenomenon, including LENR and the recent disclosure of Ed Storms. That disclosure is suggestive a hidden kind of radiation which accelerates nuclear decay rates. http://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2012/Q3/new-system-could-predict-sol ar-flares,-give-advance-warning.html A known variety of radiation which can alter decay rates is neutrinos, except for the huge problem that neutrinos should not be detected or absorbed in anywhere close to the needed amount. The undefined radiation is associated with solar flares but precedes the flare. However, since neutrinos are always present in a massive flux that is relatively independent of flares, but would not be absorbed in anything like the proportions which are required to alter decay- does this finding not specifically suggest a new kind of radiation which renders neutrinos more active (absorbable)? I think that it does suggest this or something similar, but the University Researchers involved will not go that far. (as Mel Brooks sez: we have to protect our phony baloney jobs). To me, this finding suggests that the standard neutrino flux, which is a given, can be modulated or altered somehow, so as to be absorbed at many or orders of magnitude higher rates, when the mystery radiation is present (compared to normal). That radiation can be produced in LENR apparently, as well as in the solar corona. (note: the flare is a corona feature, which is a bit different than a solar feature). In short, this mystery radiation would operate like the A-B effect - except with respect to the neutrino flux instead of with respect to charged particles. It could even be called a neutrino Aharonov-Bohm effect. QUOTE: Researchers have recorded data during 10 solar flares since 2006, seeing the same patternWe have repeatedly seen a precursor signal preceding a solar flare, Fischbach said. We think this has predictive value. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
[Vo]:Frequency of Carrington-type solar storms + new preprints
How often do Carrington-type solar storms occur? Occurrence rate of extreme magnetic storms http://arxiv.org/abs/1211.4417 Possibility of transient room-temp superconductivity Superradiant Superconductivity http://arxiv.org/abs/1211.4567 Nanoparticles may focus fields to arbitrarily high strengths The Physics of Unbounded, Broadband Absorption/Gain Efficiency in Plasmonic Nanoparticles http://arxiv.org/abs/1211.3797
[Vo]:Steven Jones: Excess heat is real, but probably not nuclear
Courtesy of pesn.com - Steven Jones replica: Pons Fleischmann XS Heat not from fusion Jones is experimenting with a bell electrode setup that strongly evidences excess (xs) energy and has similarities to the cell presented by Pons and Fleischmann. He says that there are at least two distinct phenomena in these experiments and that fusion is not what most of these CF or LENR types of arrangements exhibit http://pesn.com/2012/11/19/9602225_Steven_Jones_replica--Pons_and_Fleischmann_XS_Heat_not_from_fusion/
Re: [Vo]:Steven Jones: Excess heat is real, but probably not nuclear
Gad. What a jerk. Was, is, remains. - Jed
Re: [Vo]:Frequency of Carrington-type solar storms + new preprints
With about the same frequency that three large comets (2 long period and 1 short period) visit the inner solar system... Panstarrs visits once every 110,000 years. I hope the sun does not have a bad spell The other thing that occurs approx once every 500 years as found in ice cores is: Ice cores http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_core contain thin nitrate-rich layers that can be analyzed to reconstruct a history of past events before reliable observations; the data from Greenland ice cores was gathered by Kenneth G. McCracken http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_G._McCracken[9]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_storm_of_1859#cite_note-9 and others. These show evidence that events of this magnitude—as measured by *high-energy proton radiation*, not geomagnetic effect—occur approximately once per 500 years, with events at least one-fifth as large occurring several times per century.[10]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_storm_of_1859#cite_note-mccracken-10 Less severe storms have occurred in 1921 and 1960, when widespread radio disruption was reported. If I am right about Comets and dark matter, through beta decay they should create a massive number of protons, electrons and neutrinos in their path, which as I said earlier is very bad for DNA as well as IPADS and Power Grids If you don’t see the comet this time around, you’ll have to wait 7 years for its return. Hergenrother is a *short* ***period* or *periodic* comet – one that orbits the sun in fewer than 200 years. That’s what the “P” stands for in its name. Since its discovery in 1998 by American astronomer Carl Hergenrother, this feathery visitor is making its third observed trip. About 265 numbered periodic comets have been discovered to date. Unnumbered periodic comets number nearly 250. Next in our comet lineup is comet *C/2011 L4 PANSTARRS*http://cometography.com/lcomets/2011l4.html. The “C” indicates a long-period comet or one that orbits the sun in more than 200 years. Two hundred? That’s nothing. L4 Pan-STARRS’s period is estimated at 110,000 years. Seeing it’s a once-in-a-lifetime experience for sure. On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:13 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: How often do Carrington-type solar storms occur? Occurrence rate of extreme magnetic storms http://arxiv.org/abs/1211.4417 Possibility of transient room-temp superconductivity Superradiant Superconductivity http://arxiv.org/abs/1211.4567 Nanoparticles may focus fields to arbitrarily high strengths The Physics of Unbounded, Broadband Absorption/Gain Efficiency in Plasmonic Nanoparticles http://arxiv.org/abs/1211.3797
Re: [Vo]:Steven Jones: Excess heat is real, but probably not nuclear
It's a really weird article. It starts off with this title: Steven Jones replica: Pons Fleischmann XS Heat not from fusion Then the author (Allen) goes on to quote Jones as follows: ... there is a confirmed and published effect showing products of d-d [deuterium-deuterium] fusion at low levels. This is true 'cold fusion' ... But then author Allen goes on to summarize: Jones has adamantly stated that the PF reactions, while producing excess heat, are not due to fusion. (wtf!?) and The problem with calling it fusion when it is not ... (wtf again!?) So it seems to me the larger problem here is that Allen's article is incoherent, quoting Jones as saying one thing and then summarizing him (and titling the article!) by saying exactly the opposite. Jeff On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: Gad. What a jerk. Was, is, remains. - Jed
Re: [Vo]:Steven Jones: Excess heat is real, but probably not nuclear
Here is my exegesis of Sterling Allan's presentation of Steven Jones's recent research: 1. There is piezonuclear fusion. Fleischmann's and Pons's discovery was not this. 2. There is metal-assisted d-d fusion. Fleischmann's and Pons's discovery was also not this. 3. There is anamalous xs heat, or Freedom Energy, which is what Fleischmann and Pons investigated. They did not discover it. Peter Davey, in the 1940s, also researched it. People do not know what goes into anomalous xs heat, but to call it fusion 3a. confuses the issue, because people want to see radiation if there is fusion. 3b. is incorrect. I couldn't tell whether Jones insisted on (3b) or was just emphasizing (3a). Eric On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote: It's a really weird article. It starts off with this title: Steven Jones replica: Pons Fleischmann XS Heat not from fusion
Re: [Vo]:Steven Jones: Excess heat is real, but probably not nuclear
I thought the article was incoherent enough that I'd be afraid to guess what the author really thinks his own point is. Ymmv. Jeff On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote: Here is my exegesis of Sterling Allan's presentation of Steven Jones's recent research: 1. There is piezonuclear fusion. Fleischmann's and Pons's discovery was not this. 2. There is metal-assisted d-d fusion. Fleischmann's and Pons's discovery was also not this. 3. There is anamalous xs heat, or Freedom Energy, which is what Fleischmann and Pons investigated. They did not discover it. Peter Davey, in the 1940s, also researched it. People do not know what goes into anomalous xs heat, but to call it fusion 3a. confuses the issue, because people want to see radiation if there is fusion. 3b. is incorrect. I couldn't tell whether Jones insisted on (3b) or was just emphasizing (3a). Eric On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote: It's a really weird article. It starts off with this title: Steven Jones replica: Pons Fleischmann XS Heat not from fusion
Re: [Vo]:Steven Jones: Excess heat is real, but probably not nuclear
http://www.totalizm.nazwa.pl/boiler.htm This reference contains technical details of the boiler invented by Mr Peter Daysh Davey which is the basis of the design discussed in this thread. Cheers: Axil On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:39 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: Courtesy of pesn.com - Steven Jones replica: Pons Fleischmann XS Heat not from fusion Jones is experimenting with a bell electrode setup that strongly evidences excess (xs) energy and has similarities to the cell presented by Pons and Fleischmann. He says that there are at least two distinct phenomena in these experiments and that fusion is not what most of these CF or LENR types of arrangements exhibit http://pesn.com/2012/11/19/9602225_Steven_Jones_replica--Pons_and_Fleischmann_XS_Heat_not_from_fusion/
