Re: [WISPA] Overheating UPS?

2010-07-28 Thread Matt Larsen - Lists
It is getting ready to fail.I have had two APCs that got hot and 
failed soon after.One made for an awful stink in the NOC when it 
finally went.   I thought the building was on fire.

Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com

On 7/27/2010 7:39 PM, Forbes Mercy wrote:
 One of my UPS's at a house/tower was chirping, I sent a technician to
 pull the unit in for testing.  It was so hot that they had to wrap it in
 towels to move it, it wasn't chirping when he got there.  It has a
 minimum load of about 3-4 amps for a couple Mikrotik and Motorola radios
 on it with a switch and remote reboot unit.  The UPS was in an attic of
 the house and it is averaging about 95 degrees (we don't have humidity
 here) outside so I figure over 100 in the attic.  I'll let it cool down
 overnight in the office but my guess is the chirping was a high temp
 warning, any ideas?

 SmartAPC Model SUA 750 - about a year old.

 Forbes


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Off-net rebooting

2010-07-28 Thread Jon Auer
You can also get a data card with a telemetry plan from a cell carrier
and plug it into a Mikrotik.
The setup fee can be pretty steep but once its set up the cost isn't
super high so long as you aren't pushing a lot of data.
Gets you out of band access to the tower network including any network
controllable outlet strips/PDUs/rebooters.

On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Ryan Spott rsp...@irongoat.net wrote:
 $200 bucks and a prepaid SIM card?
 http://www.gsm-auto.com/
 ryan

 On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net
 wrote:

 They still them and actively support them in many areas, according to
 them.  They say the problem is that the paging providers are closing down in
 some areas due to the economy.

 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 On 7/27/2010 1:04 PM, Cameron Crum wrote:

 nighthawk systems used to sell pager reboot devices. I still have a few,
 but they quit supporting the paging protocol used on my units...now they are
 paperweights.

 Cameron

 On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net
 wrote:

  What are you guys doing for off-net rebooting?  I know someone at
 WISPCON years back had a pager based system.  I'm sure there are
 cellular based systems now, but I'm not sure how the cost compares.

 --


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Overheating UPS?

2010-07-28 Thread jp
I've had the 2u rackmount APCs eventually get hot and overcharge the 
battery. They'd be quite warm with little or no load, and the batteries 
would bulge. This is in 72f datacenter. They last much shorter in 95 
degree heat in my opinion. When it happens, we pull them out of service 
and use a tripplite APS. For small cheap UPSs we get a APC backups or 
tripplite or whatever is onsale at staples.

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:29:26AM -0600, Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:
 It is getting ready to fail.I have had two APCs that got hot and 
 failed soon after.One made for an awful stink in the NOC when it 
 finally went.   I thought the building was on fire.
 
 Matt Larsen
 vistabeam.com
 
 On 7/27/2010 7:39 PM, Forbes Mercy wrote:
  One of my UPS's at a house/tower was chirping, I sent a technician to
  pull the unit in for testing.  It was so hot that they had to wrap it in
  towels to move it, it wasn't chirping when he got there.  It has a
  minimum load of about 3-4 amps for a couple Mikrotik and Motorola radios
  on it with a switch and remote reboot unit.  The UPS was in an attic of
  the house and it is averaging about 95 degrees (we don't have humidity
  here) outside so I figure over 100 in the attic.  I'll let it cool down
  overnight in the office but my guess is the chirping was a high temp
  warning, any ideas?
 
  SmartAPC Model SUA 750 - about a year old.
 
  Forbes
 
 
  
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
  
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

-- 
/*
Jason Philbrook   |   Midcoast Internet Solutions - Wireless and DSL
KB1IOJ|   Broadband Internet Access, Dialup, and Hosting 
 http://f64.nu/   |   for Midcoast Mainehttp://www.midcoast.com/
*/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Overheating UPS?

2010-07-28 Thread Forbes Mercy
Honestly isn't this something the Underwriters Laboratory would be 
interested in since they certify these units?

On 7/28/2010 8:44 AM, jp wrote:
 I've had the 2u rackmount APCs eventually get hot and overcharge the
 battery. They'd be quite warm with little or no load, and the batteries
 would bulge. This is in 72f datacenter. They last much shorter in 95
 degree heat in my opinion. When it happens, we pull them out of service
 and use a tripplite APS. For small cheap UPSs we get a APC backups or
 tripplite or whatever is onsale at staples.

 On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:29:26AM -0600, Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:

 It is getting ready to fail.I have had two APCs that got hot and
 failed soon after.One made for an awful stink in the NOC when it
 finally went.   I thought the building was on fire.

 Matt Larsen
 vistabeam.com

 On 7/27/2010 7:39 PM, Forbes Mercy wrote:
  
 One of my UPS's at a house/tower was chirping, I sent a technician to
 pull the unit in for testing.  It was so hot that they had to wrap it in
 towels to move it, it wasn't chirping when he got there.  It has a
 minimum load of about 3-4 amps for a couple Mikrotik and Motorola radios
 on it with a switch and remote reboot unit.  The UPS was in an attic of
 the house and it is averaging about 95 degrees (we don't have humidity
 here) outside so I figure over 100 in the attic.  I'll let it cool down
 overnight in the office but my guess is the chirping was a high temp
 warning, any ideas?

 SmartAPC Model SUA 750 - about a year old.

 Forbes


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
  





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Pole-mounted base stations

2010-07-28 Thread Paul Gerstenberger
Our APs are generally on dedicated poles. We did work a deal with a neighbor 
PUD to mount some equipment on their primary poles, in which case we had to 
maintain proper clearances from the power and communication space.  Mounts 
depend on the radio. Sometimes we just use a radio shack offset mast bracket, 
we've used a lot MTI brackets because they bolt right up to Trango, and we've 
pipe-straped a metal mast to the top of the wood pole. I'll be working at a 
couple sites this week, I'll snap some pictures.

Here are the MTI brackets: 
http://www.mtiwe.com/UserFiles/Image/MTI/Enclosure_Units/big/MT-120018-and-MT-120018A%5B1%5D.jpg

-Paul

On Jul 27, 2010, at 11:32 AM, Fred Goldstein wrote:

 At 7/27/2010 02:12 PM, you wrote:
 We ourselves are an electric co-op and ISP, most of our towers are 
 65ft poles. If your local co-op is friendly, it's a good way to go.
 
 Thanks... I think the ccop will be friendly enough, where they have 
 poles. I've tried to locate nodes along pole routes when 
 possible.  Some back roads don't have poles, though, so we may need 
 to put up our own.
 
 Most antenna mounts want to be on a 1-3 inch metal pole.  What 
 hardware do you use to attach to the wood pole?  And do you ever put 
 antennas above the primaries, on a nonconductive mount, or do you 
 always stay down in the safe zone?  Thanks...
 
 -Paul
 
 On Jul 19, 2010, at 1:23 PM, Fred R. Goldstein wrote:
 
 A design I'm working on is in a hilly wooded rural/resort area, not
 farmland.  It will need a fair number (perhaps a few dozen) sites to
 cover the planned turf.  Each node will need both backhaul (mesh, in
 the loose sense) and access antennas.  The obvious place to put these
 is atop utility poles.  I think the local electric cooperative will
 cooperate and let us rent pole space.  We may however need to put
 additional poles in some places.  They seem cheaper than metal towers
 and are less likely to raise the locals' eyebrows.
 
 Does anyone out there have experience with this sort of
 arrangement?  We're in the budgeting stage now.  I have an idea what
 the radios cost but the installation might be the bigger deal.  The
 big engineering firms are more used to fancy cellular and fiber
 installs, not WISP-style radios.  So we may also want to bring in
 someone with this kind of WISP experience to do some consulting or
 setup with us too.  Thanks.
 
 
 
  --
  Fred Goldsteink1io   fgoldstein at ionary.com
  ionary Consulting  http://www.ionary.com/
  +1 617 795 2701 
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] Mikrotik User Meeting

2010-07-28 Thread Paul Gerstenberger
Has anyone attended the MUM's? What were your impressions? I'm thinking of 
going this year, curious what to expect. I've integrated mikrotik into our 
production network and so far it's working well, be nice to have a little 
official training though.

-Paul



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik User Meeting

2010-07-28 Thread Josh Luthman
MUM is not for training.  MUM is similar to Animal Farm if you've been
there.  It's more of a trade show and has a few presentations on how some
people use Mikrotik.

If you want training I'd suggest Butch Evans' classes.  I found the basic
class to be very informative even knowing quite a bit of the material.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373


On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Paul Gerstenberger pa...@hrec.coopwrote:

 Has anyone attended the MUM's? What were your impressions? I'm thinking of
 going this year, curious what to expect. I've integrated mikrotik into our
 production network and so far it's working well, be nice to have a little
 official training though.

 -Paul



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

[WISPA] USF Reform Bill Introduced - The most compelling reason to document and map your network coverage ever

2010-07-28 Thread Brian Webster
Steve Coran just posted the message below to the WISPA FCC committee list. I
took particular note to the following statement:

 

- would reduce or deny support to wireline incumbents in areas where at
least 75% of households can receive voice and broadband from a competitive
provider that does not receive support

 

Now the way I read the above statement is that if a WISP covers 75% of a
current USF recipients service area, there will no longer be eligibility to
receive USF funds. Remember if they have broadband they also have access to
many VOIP providers even if you do not provide VOIP services. Vonage and
Skype come to mind, not to mention cellular coverage. This would be a huge
factor in leveling the playing field for WISP's in rural markets! I cannot
see a more compelling reason to document and map your networks than this.
Not only will it prevent yet another subsidized competitor from coming in to
your service area, but it will also erode funding  for any Telco who
currently receives USF in your markets. This would bring wireless as a
delivery method to the forefront because there are then no artificial
revenue streams subsidizing the cost to deliver last mile service. We all
know that wireless has the least cost per household passed in low density
markets.

 

There are many ways to document and map your coverage areas. First and
foremost though is that you should file the Form 477 as required. Next one
should map their network with an accurate service area where you would
confidently offer service. This can be done many ways (including paying me
to do it). This also shows a very important reason to be participating in
your state broadband mapping efforts. I would expect that those state maps
will become one of the major verification sources to establish the 75%
coverage. The FCC 477 database will probably become another verification
source. If you are listed in both of them it would be very hard for someone
to say you don't exist and don't offer coverage in their areas.

 

One of the downsides to this bill is that all broadband providers will be
required to contribute to the fund. My gut feeling though is that if WISP's
were accurately mapped and documented it would show so much less of the US
is unserved by broadband and thus the required funding through USF to get it
there will be much less.



Brian

--

 

Last week, Reps. Boucher (D-VA) and Terry (R-NE) introduced legislation that
would reform the Universal Service Fund.  The Press Release, Overview,
Section by Section summary and text of the bill are available at this link:

http://www.boucher.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content
http://www.boucher.house.gov/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=1579
Itemid=122 task=viewid=1579Itemid=122

 

I have not read these documents, but plan to do so soon.  A few highlights
that the trade press has noted:

- would reduce or deny support to wireline incumbents in areas where at
least 75% of households can receive voice and broadband from a competitive
provider that does not receive support

- FCC would create cost model that includes broadband in figuring
support models

- competitive bidding among wireless carriers for USF support

- no more than two wireless CETCs could get support in the same area

- carriers would have 5 years to provide broadband throughout their
service areas, or would lose support

- all broadband providers would pay into USF to expand contribution base

- FCC to decide appropriate speed for broadband 

 

Rep. Boucher has said that the bill is on his front burner and that he
wants to get the legislation passed this Fall.  Please feel free to comment
on-list AFTER you've reviewed the documents so that you can promote
education of the WISPA membership and help shape whatever position WISPA may
wish to take as the bill works its way through Congress.  Thanks.  

 

Stephen E. Coran

Rini Coran, PC

1140 19th Street, NW, Suite 600 

Washington, D.C. 20036

202.463.4310 - voice

202.669.3288 - cell

202.296.2014 - fax

 mailto:sco...@rinicoran.com sco...@rinicoran.com - e-mail

www.rinicoran.com http://www.rinicoran.com/ 

www.telecommunicationslaw.com http://www.telecommunicationslaw.com/ 

 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Pole-mounted base stations

2010-07-28 Thread Mike
I use these: http://www.sitepro1.com/store/cart.php?m=product_listc=51

Look down the page for Taper Adjustable Chain Mount, single sectors,
TCHM1-L.  They come with plenty of chain and you cut off excess with bolt
cutters.  I fit a length of schedule 80 4 pipe to mount radios above the
pole and take a solid bronze ground lead down the pole.

You put these things on right and you will have no problems.  Nice hardware.

Friendly Regards,
 
Mike
 
Mike Gilchrist
Disruptive Technologist
Advanced Wireless Express
P.O. Box 255
Toledo, IA   52342
239.770.6203
m...@aweiowa.com
 

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Paul Gerstenberger
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 11:12 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Pole-mounted base stations

Our APs are generally on dedicated poles. We did work a deal with a neighbor
PUD to mount some equipment on their primary poles, in which case we had to
maintain proper clearances from the power and communication space.  Mounts
depend on the radio. Sometimes we just use a radio shack offset mast
bracket, we've used a lot MTI brackets because they bolt right up to Trango,
and we've pipe-straped a metal mast to the top of the wood pole. I'll be
working at a couple sites this week, I'll snap some pictures.

Here are the MTI brackets:
http://www.mtiwe.com/UserFiles/Image/MTI/Enclosure_Units/big/MT-120018-and-M
T-120018A%5B1%5D.jpg

-Paul

On Jul 27, 2010, at 11:32 AM, Fred Goldstein wrote:

 At 7/27/2010 02:12 PM, you wrote:
 We ourselves are an electric co-op and ISP, most of our towers are 
 65ft poles. If your local co-op is friendly, it's a good way to go.
 
 Thanks... I think the ccop will be friendly enough, where they have 
 poles. I've tried to locate nodes along pole routes when 
 possible.  Some back roads don't have poles, though, so we may need 
 to put up our own.
 
 Most antenna mounts want to be on a 1-3 inch metal pole.  What 
 hardware do you use to attach to the wood pole?  And do you ever put 
 antennas above the primaries, on a nonconductive mount, or do you 
 always stay down in the safe zone?  Thanks...
 
 -Paul
 
 On Jul 19, 2010, at 1:23 PM, Fred R. Goldstein wrote:
 
 A design I'm working on is in a hilly wooded rural/resort area, not
 farmland.  It will need a fair number (perhaps a few dozen) sites to
 cover the planned turf.  Each node will need both backhaul (mesh, in
 the loose sense) and access antennas.  The obvious place to put these
 is atop utility poles.  I think the local electric cooperative will
 cooperate and let us rent pole space.  We may however need to put
 additional poles in some places.  They seem cheaper than metal towers
 and are less likely to raise the locals' eyebrows.
 
 Does anyone out there have experience with this sort of
 arrangement?  We're in the budgeting stage now.  I have an idea what
 the radios cost but the installation might be the bigger deal.  The
 big engineering firms are more used to fancy cellular and fiber
 installs, not WISP-style radios.  So we may also want to bring in
 someone with this kind of WISP experience to do some consulting or
 setup with us too.  Thanks.
 
 
 
  --
  Fred Goldsteink1io   fgoldstein at ionary.com
  ionary Consulting  http://www.ionary.com/
  +1 617 795 2701 
 
 
 



 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/



 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Pole-mounted base stations

2010-07-28 Thread Ryan Spott
Was this a WA state PUD? Do you have some pics of an install or 2?

ryan

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Paul Gerstenberger pa...@hrec.coop wrote:

 Our APs are generally on dedicated poles. We did work a deal with a
 neighbor PUD to mount some equipment on their primary poles, in which case
 we had to maintain proper clearances from the power and communication space.
  Mounts depend on the radio. Sometimes we just use a radio shack offset mast
 bracket, we've used a lot MTI brackets because they bolt right up to Trango,
 and we've pipe-straped a metal mast to the top of the wood pole. I'll be
 working at a couple sites this week, I'll snap some pictures.

 Here are the MTI brackets:
 http://www.mtiwe.com/UserFiles/Image/MTI/Enclosure_Units/big/MT-120018-and-MT-120018A%5B1%5D.jpg

 -Paul

 On Jul 27, 2010, at 11:32 AM, Fred Goldstein wrote:

  At 7/27/2010 02:12 PM, you wrote:
  We ourselves are an electric co-op and ISP, most of our towers are
  65ft poles. If your local co-op is friendly, it's a good way to go.
 
  Thanks... I think the ccop will be friendly enough, where they have
  poles. I've tried to locate nodes along pole routes when
  possible.  Some back roads don't have poles, though, so we may need
  to put up our own.
 
  Most antenna mounts want to be on a 1-3 inch metal pole.  What
  hardware do you use to attach to the wood pole?  And do you ever put
  antennas above the primaries, on a nonconductive mount, or do you
  always stay down in the safe zone?  Thanks...
 
  -Paul
 
  On Jul 19, 2010, at 1:23 PM, Fred R. Goldstein wrote:
 
  A design I'm working on is in a hilly wooded rural/resort area, not
  farmland.  It will need a fair number (perhaps a few dozen) sites to
  cover the planned turf.  Each node will need both backhaul (mesh, in
  the loose sense) and access antennas.  The obvious place to put these
  is atop utility poles.  I think the local electric cooperative will
  cooperate and let us rent pole space.  We may however need to put
  additional poles in some places.  They seem cheaper than metal towers
  and are less likely to raise the locals' eyebrows.
 
  Does anyone out there have experience with this sort of
  arrangement?  We're in the budgeting stage now.  I have an idea what
  the radios cost but the installation might be the bigger deal.  The
  big engineering firms are more used to fancy cellular and fiber
  installs, not WISP-style radios.  So we may also want to bring in
  someone with this kind of WISP experience to do some consulting or
  setup with us too.  Thanks.
 
 
 
   --
   Fred Goldsteink1io   fgoldstein at ionary.com
   ionary Consulting  http://www.ionary.com/
   +1 617 795 2701
 
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik User Meeting

2010-07-28 Thread Butch Evans
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 09:24 -0700, Paul Gerstenberger wrote: 
 Has anyone attended the MUM's? What were your impressions? 
 I'm thinking of going this year, curious what to expect. I've 
 integrated mikrotik into our production network and so far 
 it's working well, be nice to have a little official training 
 though.

I have a training class scheduled for next week (see
http://store.wispgear.net/ for details).  Mikrotik's official training
(from the reviews I've seen) don't get very good reviews, due to the
difficulty people have in understanding what they are saying...

As for the MUM, they are generally pretty good shows.  I've never heard
anyone say they were disappointed for having attended.

-- 

* Butch Evans   * Professional Network Consultation*
* http://www.butchevans.com/* Network Engineering  *
* http://store.wispgear.net/* Wired or Wireless Networks   *
* http://blog.butchevans.com/   * ImageStream, Mikrotik and MORE!  *





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik User Meeting

2010-07-28 Thread Paul Gerstenberger
I also wanted a plane ticket to Phoenix, hoping I could justify it.

-Paul

On Jul 28, 2010, at 9:31 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:

 MUM is not for training.  MUM is similar to Animal Farm if you've been there. 
  It's more of a trade show and has a few presentations on how some people use 
 Mikrotik.
 
 If you want training I'd suggest Butch Evans' classes.  I found the basic 
 class to be very informative even knowing quite a bit of the material.
 
 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373
 
 
 On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Paul Gerstenberger pa...@hrec.coop wrote:
 Has anyone attended the MUM's? What were your impressions? I'm thinking of 
 going this year, curious what to expect. I've integrated mikrotik into our 
 production network and so far it's working well, be nice to have a little 
 official training though.
 
 -Paul
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] USF Reform Bill Introduced - The most compelling reason todocument and map your network coverage ever

2010-07-28 Thread Patrick Leary
I agree Brian that this is potentially a huge positive for WISPs.
People, if you have not declared yourself officially, you are shooting
yourself in the foot (maybe the head). File your Form 477.
 
Patrick Leary
Aperto Networks
813.426.4230 mobile
 



From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Brian Webster
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 9:37 AM
To: memb...@wispa.org; 'WISPA General List'; motor...@afmug.com
Subject: [WISPA] USF Reform Bill Introduced - The most compelling reason
todocument and map your network coverage ever
Importance: High



Steve Coran just posted the message below to the WISPA FCC committee
list. I took particular note to the following statement:

 

- would reduce or deny support to wireline incumbents in areas where at
least 75% of households can receive voice and broadband from a
competitive provider that does not receive support

 

Now the way I read the above statement is that if a WISP covers 75% of a
current USF recipients service area, there will no longer be eligibility
to receive USF funds. Remember if they have broadband they also have
access to many VOIP providers even if you do not provide VOIP services.
Vonage and Skype come to mind, not to mention cellular coverage. This
would be a huge factor in leveling the playing field for WISP's in rural
markets! I cannot see a more compelling reason to document and map your
networks than this. Not only will it prevent yet another subsidized
competitor from coming in to your service area, but it will also erode
funding  for any Telco who currently receives USF in your markets. This
would bring wireless as a delivery method to the forefront because there
are then no artificial revenue streams subsidizing the cost to deliver
last mile service. We all know that wireless has the least cost per
household passed in low density markets.

 

There are many ways to document and map your coverage areas. First and
foremost though is that you should file the Form 477 as required. Next
one should map their network with an accurate service area where you
would confidently offer service. This can be done many ways (including
paying me to do it). This also shows a very important reason to be
participating in your state broadband mapping efforts. I would expect
that those state maps will become one of the major verification sources
to establish the 75% coverage. The FCC 477 database will probably become
another verification source. If you are listed in both of them it would
be very hard for someone to say you don't exist and don't offer coverage
in their areas.

 

One of the downsides to this bill is that all broadband providers will
be required to contribute to the fund. My gut feeling though is that if
WISP's were accurately mapped and documented it would show so much less
of the US is unserved by broadband and thus the required funding through
USF to get it there will be much less.



Brian

--

 

Last week, Reps. Boucher (D-VA) and Terry (R-NE) introduced legislation
that would reform the Universal Service Fund.  The Press Release,
Overview, Section by Section summary and text of the bill are available
at this link:

http://www.boucher.house.gov/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=1
579Itemid=122

 

I have not read these documents, but plan to do so soon.  A few
highlights that the trade press has noted:

- would reduce or deny support to wireline incumbents in areas where
at least 75% of households can receive voice and broadband from a
competitive provider that does not receive support

- FCC would create cost model that includes broadband in figuring
support models

- competitive bidding among wireless carriers for USF support

- no more than two wireless CETCs could get support in the same area

- carriers would have 5 years to provide broadband throughout their
service areas, or would lose support

- all broadband providers would pay into USF to expand contribution
base

- FCC to decide appropriate speed for broadband 

 

Rep. Boucher has said that the bill is on his front burner and that he
wants to get the legislation passed this Fall.  Please feel free to
comment on-list AFTER you've reviewed the documents so that you can
promote education of the WISPA membership and help shape whatever
position WISPA may wish to take as the bill works its way through
Congress.  Thanks.  

 

Stephen E. Coran

Rini Coran, PC

1140 19th Street, NW, Suite 600 

Washington, D.C. 20036

202.463.4310 - voice

202.669.3288 - cell

202.296.2014 - fax

sco...@rinicoran.com mailto:sco...@rinicoran.com  - e-mail

www.rinicoran.com http://www.rinicoran.com/ 

www.telecommunicationslaw.com http://www.telecommunicationslaw.com/ 

 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

Re: [WISPA] USF Reform Bill Introduced - The most compelling reason to document and map your network coverage ever

2010-07-28 Thread St. Louis Broadband
- would reduce or deny support to wireline incumbents in areas where at
least 75% of households can receive voice and broadband from a competitive
provider that does not receive support

 

Ø  Now the way I read the above statement is that if a WISP covers 75% of a
current USF recipients service area, there will no longer be eligibility to
receive USF funds. Remember if they have broadband they also have access to
many VOIP providers even if you do not provide VOIP services. Vonage and
Skype come to mind, not to mention cellular coverage. This would be a huge
factor in leveling the playing field for WISP’s in rural markets!

 

That is the way I see it too!

 

 

Victoria Proffer

www.ShowMeBroadband.com

www.StLouisBroadband.com

314-974-5600

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Brian Webster
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 11:37 AM
To: memb...@wispa.org; 'WISPA General List'; motor...@afmug.com
Subject: [WISPA] USF Reform Bill Introduced - The most compelling reason to
document and map your network coverage ever
Importance: High

 

Steve Coran just posted the message below to the WISPA FCC committee list. I
took particular note to the following statement:

 

- would reduce or deny support to wireline incumbents in areas where at
least 75% of households can receive voice and broadband from a competitive
provider that does not receive support

 

Now the way I read the above statement is that if a WISP covers 75% of a
current USF recipients service area, there will no longer be eligibility to
receive USF funds. Remember if they have broadband they also have access to
many VOIP providers even if you do not provide VOIP services. Vonage and
Skype come to mind, not to mention cellular coverage. This would be a huge
factor in leveling the playing field for WISP’s in rural markets! I cannot
see a more compelling reason to document and map your networks than this.
Not only will it prevent yet another subsidized competitor from coming in to
your service area, but it will also erode funding  for any Telco who
currently receives USF in your markets. This would bring wireless as a
delivery method to the forefront because there are then no artificial
revenue streams subsidizing the cost to deliver last mile service. We all
know that wireless has the least cost per household passed in low density
markets.

 

There are many ways to document and map your coverage areas. First and
foremost though is that you should file the Form 477 as required. Next one
should map their network with an accurate service area where you would
confidently offer service. This can be done many ways (including paying me
to do it). This also shows a very important reason to be participating in
your state broadband mapping efforts. I would expect that those state maps
will become one of the major verification sources to establish the 75%
coverage. The FCC 477 database will probably become another verification
source. If you are listed in both of them it would be very hard for someone
to say you don’t exist and don’t offer coverage in their areas.

 

One of the downsides to this bill is that all broadband providers will be
required to contribute to the fund. My gut feeling though is that if WISP’s
were accurately mapped and documented it would show so much less of the US
is unserved by broadband and thus the required funding through USF to get it
there will be much less.



Brian

--

 

Last week, Reps. Boucher (D-VA) and Terry (R-NE) introduced legislation that
would reform the Universal Service Fund.  The Press Release, Overview,
Section by Section summary and text of the bill are available at this link:

http://www.boucher.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content
http://www.boucher.house.gov/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=1579
Itemid=122 task=viewid=1579Itemid=122

 

I have not read these documents, but plan to do so soon.  A few highlights
that the trade press has noted:

- would reduce or deny support to wireline incumbents in areas where at
least 75% of households can receive voice and broadband from a competitive
provider that does not receive support

- FCC would create cost model that includes broadband in figuring
support models

- competitive bidding among wireless carriers for USF support

- no more than two wireless CETCs could get support in the same area

- carriers would have 5 years to provide broadband throughout their
service areas, or would lose support

- all broadband providers would pay into USF to expand contribution base

- FCC to decide appropriate speed for broadband 

 

Rep. Boucher has said that the bill is on his front burner and that he
wants to get the legislation passed this Fall.  Please feel free to comment
on-list AFTER you've reviewed the documents so that you can promote
education of the WISPA membership and help shape whatever position WISPA may
wish to take as the bill works its way 

Re: [WISPA] USF Reform Bill Introduced - The most compelling reason todocument and map your network coverage ever

2010-07-28 Thread Josh Luthman
The next deadline is September 1, keep in mind.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373


On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Patrick Leary ple...@apertonet.comwrote:

  I agree Brian that this is potentially a huge positive for WISPs. People,
 if you have not declared yourself officially, you are shooting yourself in
 the foot (maybe the head). File your Form 477.

 Patrick Leary
 Aperto Networks
 813.426.4230 mobile


  --
 *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
 Behalf Of *Brian Webster
 *Sent:* Wednesday, July 28, 2010 9:37 AM

 *To:* memb...@wispa.org; 'WISPA General List'; motor...@afmug.com
 *Subject:* [WISPA] USF Reform Bill Introduced - The most compelling reason
 todocument and map your network coverage ever
 *Importance:* High

  Steve Coran just posted the message below to the WISPA FCC committee
 list. I took particular note to the following statement:



 *- would reduce or deny support to wireline incumbents in areas where at
 least 75% of households can receive voice and broadband from a competitive
 provider that does not receive support***



 Now the way I read the above statement is that if a WISP covers 75% of a
 current USF recipients service area, there will no longer be eligibility to
 receive USF funds. Remember if they have broadband they also have access to
 many VOIP providers even if you do not provide VOIP services. Vonage and
 Skype come to mind, not to mention cellular coverage. *This would be a
 huge factor in leveling the playing field for WISP’s in rural markets!* I
 cannot see a more compelling reason to document and map your networks than
 this. Not only will it prevent yet another subsidized competitor from coming
 in to your service area, but it will also erode funding  for any Telco who
 currently receives USF in your markets. This would bring wireless as a
 delivery method to the forefront because there are then no artificial
 revenue streams subsidizing the cost to deliver last mile service. We all
 know that wireless has the least cost per household passed in low density
 markets.



 There are many ways to document and map your coverage areas. First and
 foremost though is that you should file *the Form 477* as required. Next
 one should map their network with an accurate service area where you would
 confidently offer service. This can be done many ways (including paying me
 to do it). This also shows a very important reason to be participating in
 your state broadband mapping efforts. I would expect that those state maps
 will become one of the major verification sources to establish the 75%
 coverage. The FCC 477 database will probably become another verification
 source. If you are listed in both of them it would be very hard for someone
 to say you don’t exist and don’t offer coverage in their areas.



 One of the downsides to this bill is that all broadband providers will be
 required to contribute to the fund. My gut feeling though is that if WISP’s
 were accurately mapped and documented it would show so much less of the US
 is unserved by broadband and thus the required funding through USF to get it
 there will be much less.



 Brian

 --



 Last week, Reps. Boucher (D-VA) and Terry (R-NE) introduced legislation
 that would reform the Universal Service Fund.  The Press Release, Overview,
 Section by Section summary and text of the bill are available at this link:


 http://www.boucher.house.gov/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=1579Itemid=122



 I have not read these documents, but plan to do so soon.  A few highlights
 that the trade press has noted:

 - would reduce or deny support to wireline incumbents in areas where at
 least 75% of households can receive voice and broadband from a competitive
 provider that does not receive support

 - FCC would create cost model that includes broadband in figuring
 support models

 - competitive bidding among wireless carriers for USF support

 - no more than two wireless CETCs could get support in the same area

 - carriers would have 5 years to provide broadband throughout their
 service areas, or would lose support

 - all broadband providers would pay into USF to expand contribution
 base

 - FCC to decide appropriate speed for broadband



 Rep. Boucher has said that the bill is on his front burner and that he
 wants to get the legislation passed this Fall.  Please feel free to comment
 on-list AFTER you've reviewed the documents so that you can promote
 education of the WISPA membership and help shape whatever position WISPA may
 wish to take as the bill works its way through Congress.  Thanks.



 Stephen E. Coran

 Rini Coran, PC

 1140 19th Street, NW, Suite 600

 Washington, D.C. 20036

 202.463.4310 - voice

 202.669.3288 - cell

 202.296.2014 - fax

 sco...@rinicoran.com - e-mail

 www.rinicoran.com

 

Re: [WISPA] Off-net rebooting

2010-07-28 Thread Kristian Hoffmann
Thanks for making me think about it.  Last night at 7:30 we had a tower
go down.  Cause...web power switch failed and shut off all the plugs.  I
guess we'll have to try the battery trick.

-Kristian

On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 19:36 -0700, Kristian Hoffmann wrote:
 We've had almost as many dispatches to fix/replace broken DLI web power
 switches as we have saved dispatches from being able to remotely reboot
 devices.  At this point, we have half a dozen on the shelf that I'm
 reluctant to send out in the field.
 
 On the other hand, we have some older units (pre autoping) that have
 been running for 2-3 years in hot nasty environments.  I wish we could
 figure out what was causing the failures because, in theory, they're
 good units and reasonably priced.
 
 -- 
 Kristian Hoffmann
 System Administrator
 kh...@fire2wire.com
 http://www.fire2wire.com  
 
 Office - 209-543-1800 | Fax - 209-545-1469 | Toll Free - 800-905-FIRE
 
 
 On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 19:36 -0400, Gino Villarini wrote:
  Anyone has experience with the webpower switch? Good ? bad ?
  
  Gino A. Villarini
  g...@aeronetpr.com
  Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
  787.273.4143
  
  -Original Message-
  From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
  Behalf Of Cameron Crum
  Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 6:32 PM
  To: WISPA General List
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] Off-net rebooting
  
  Mine quit responding so i called in...they told me they no longer
  supported the paging protocol those units used.
  
  On Tuesday, July 27, 2010, Chuck Profito cprof...@cv-access.com wrote:
   http://www.digitalloggers.com/lpc.html
  
   This is the small one, there is a larger one, both have auto ping for off
   line rebooting.  We have them on all ap / tower sites.   They a have 
   saved a
   trip up the hill many a night! no monthly fee.
   Also, put a old CB-3 into the surge side of a battery backup and your
   network auto ping will know EXACTLY when the power goes down, and you know
   how long the batteries will last.
  
  
   Chuck Profito
   209-988-7388
   CV-Access, Inc.
   www.cv-access.com / cprofito'at'cv-access.com
   Providing Broadband Internet Access to
   California's Rural Central Valley
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
   Behalf Of Mike Hammett
   Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 10:41 AM
   To: WISPA General List
   Subject: [WISPA] Off-net rebooting
  
 What are you guys doing for off-net rebooting?  I know someone at
   WISPCON years back had a pager based system.  I'm sure there are
   cellular based systems now, but I'm not sure how the cost compares.
  
   --
  
  
   -
   Mike Hammett
   Intelligent Computing Solutions
   http://www.ics-il.com
  
  
  
  
   
   
   WISPA Wants You! Join today!
   http://signup.wispa.org/
   
   
  
   WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
  
   Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
   http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
  
   Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
  
  
  
   
   WISPA Wants You! Join today!
   http://signup.wispa.org/
   
  
   WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
  
   Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
   http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
  
   Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
  
  
  
  
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
  
   
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
  
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
  
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
  
  
  
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
  
   
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
  
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
  
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
  
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!

Re: [WISPA] Off-net rebooting

2010-07-28 Thread Forbes Mercy
Most common mistake made with the Web Power Switch units is the default 
is to leave plugs off when losing power, we change those settings to 
restore to previous state on power loss, problem solved.  Don't forget 
to save changes.

Forbes

On 7/28/2010 10:26 AM, Kristian Hoffmann wrote:
 Thanks for making me think about it.  Last night at 7:30 we had a tower
 go down.  Cause...web power switch failed and shut off all the plugs.  I
 guess we'll have to try the battery trick.

 -Kristian

 On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 19:36 -0700, Kristian Hoffmann wrote:

 We've had almost as many dispatches to fix/replace broken DLI web power
 switches as we have saved dispatches from being able to remotely reboot
 devices.  At this point, we have half a dozen on the shelf that I'm
 reluctant to send out in the field.

 On the other hand, we have some older units (pre autoping) that have
 been running for 2-3 years in hot nasty environments.  I wish we could
 figure out what was causing the failures because, in theory, they're
 good units and reasonably priced.

 -- 
 Kristian Hoffmann
 System Administrator
 kh...@fire2wire.com
 http://www.fire2wire.com

 Office - 209-543-1800 | Fax - 209-545-1469 | Toll Free - 800-905-FIRE


 On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 19:36 -0400, Gino Villarini wrote:
  
 Anyone has experience with the webpower switch? Good ? bad ?

 Gino A. Villarini
 g...@aeronetpr.com
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 787.273.4143

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
 Behalf Of Cameron Crum
 Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 6:32 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Off-net rebooting

 Mine quit responding so i called in...they told me they no longer
 supported the paging protocol those units used.

 On Tuesday, July 27, 2010, Chuck Profitocprof...@cv-access.com  wrote:

 http://www.digitalloggers.com/lpc.html

 This is the small one, there is a larger one, both have auto ping for off
 line rebooting.  We have them on all ap / tower sites.   They a have saved 
 a
 trip up the hill many a night! no monthly fee.
 Also, put a old CB-3 into the surge side of a battery backup and your
 network auto ping will know EXACTLY when the power goes down, and you know
 how long the batteries will last.


 Chuck Profito
 209-988-7388
 CV-Access, Inc.
 www.cv-access.com / cprofito'at'cv-access.com
 Providing Broadband Internet Access to
 California's Rural Central Valley


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Mike Hammett
 Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 10:41 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: [WISPA] Off-net rebooting

What are you guys doing for off-net rebooting?  I know someone at
 WISPCON years back had a pager based system.  I'm sure there are
 cellular based systems now, but I'm not sure how the cost compares.

 --


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com




 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

  

 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

  


 

Re: [WISPA] Pole-mounted base stations

2010-07-28 Thread Fred Goldstein
At 7/28/2010 12:37 PM, Mike Gilchrist wrote:
I use these: http://www.sitepro1.com/store/cart.php?m=product_listc=51

Look down the page for Taper Adjustable Chain Mount, single sectors,
TCHM1-L.  They come with plenty of chain and you cut off excess with bolt
cutters.  I fit a length of schedule 80 4 pipe to mount radios above the
pole and take a solid bronze ground lead down the pole.

You put these things on right and you will have no problems.  Nice hardware.

Beautiful!  Thanks.  This is exactly what I was looking for.

Now to just find a simple, cheap, reliable (pick 3) little wind 
charger for those off-grid sites... ;-)

Friendly Regards,

Mike

Mike Gilchrist
Disruptive Technologist
Advanced Wireless Express
P.O. Box 255
Toledo, IA   52342
239.770.6203
m...@aweiowa.com


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Paul Gerstenberger
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 11:12 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Pole-mounted base stations

Our APs are generally on dedicated poles. We did work a deal with a neighbor
PUD to mount some equipment on their primary poles, in which case we had to
maintain proper clearances from the power and communication space.  Mounts
depend on the radio. Sometimes we just use a radio shack offset mast
bracket, we've used a lot MTI brackets because they bolt right up to Trango,
and we've pipe-straped a metal mast to the top of the wood pole. I'll be
working at a couple sites this week, I'll snap some pictures.

Here are the MTI brackets:
http://www.mtiwe.com/UserFiles/Image/MTI/Enclosure_Units/big/MT-120018-and-M
T-120018A%5B1%5D.jpg

-Paul

On Jul 27, 2010, at 11:32 AM, Fred Goldstein wrote:

  At 7/27/2010 02:12 PM, you wrote:
  We ourselves are an electric co-op and ISP, most of our towers are
  65ft poles. If your local co-op is friendly, it's a good way to go.
 
  Thanks... I think the ccop will be friendly enough, where they have
  poles. I've tried to locate nodes along pole routes when
  possible.  Some back roads don't have poles, though, so we may need
  to put up our own.
 
  Most antenna mounts want to be on a 1-3 inch metal pole.  What
  hardware do you use to attach to the wood pole?  And do you ever put
  antennas above the primaries, on a nonconductive mount, or do you
  always stay down in the safe zone?  Thanks...
 
  -Paul
 
  On Jul 19, 2010, at 1:23 PM, Fred R. Goldstein wrote:
 
  A design I'm working on is in a hilly wooded rural/resort area, not
  farmland.  It will need a fair number (perhaps a few dozen) sites to
  cover the planned turf.  Each node will need both backhaul (mesh, in
  the loose sense) and access antennas.  The obvious place to put these
  is atop utility poles.  I think the local electric cooperative will
  cooperate and let us rent pole space.  We may however need to put
  additional poles in some places.  They seem cheaper than metal towers
  and are less likely to raise the locals' eyebrows.
 
  Does anyone out there have experience with this sort of
  arrangement?  We're in the budgeting stage now.  I have an idea what
  the radios cost but the installation might be the bigger deal.  The
  big engineering firms are more used to fancy cellular and fiber
  installs, not WISP-style radios.  So we may also want to bring in
  someone with this kind of WISP experience to do some consulting or
  setup with us too.  Thanks.
 

  --
  Fred Goldsteink1io   fgoldstein at ionary.com
  ionary Consulting  http://www.ionary.com/
  +1 617 795 2701 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Pole-mounted base stations

2010-07-28 Thread Scott Parsons
Not sure if this Wind Turbine is small enough or cheap enough for you but
12V 20A $490:

http://www.beezwaxproducts.com/product_info.php?products_id=49

 

Regards,
Scott

e-zy.net

PH: 801-432-0098

FAX: 801-618-4220

sc...@e-zy.net

www.e-zy.net

 

 

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Fred Goldstein
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 12:21 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Pole-mounted base stations

 

At 7/28/2010 12:37 PM, Mike Gilchrist wrote:

I use these: http://www.sitepro1.com/store/cart.php?m=product_listc=51

 

Look down the page for Taper Adjustable Chain Mount, single sectors,

TCHM1-L.  They come with plenty of chain and you cut off excess with bolt

cutters.  I fit a length of schedule 80 4 pipe to mount radios above the

pole and take a solid bronze ground lead down the pole.

 

You put these things on right and you will have no problems.  Nice
hardware.

 

Beautiful!  Thanks.  This is exactly what I was looking for.

 

Now to just find a simple, cheap, reliable (pick 3) little wind 

charger for those off-grid sites... ;-)

 

Friendly Regards,

 

Mike

 

Mike Gilchrist

Disruptive Technologist

Advanced Wireless Express

P.O. Box 255

Toledo, IA   52342

239.770.6203

m...@aweiowa.com

 

 

-Original Message-

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On

Behalf Of Paul Gerstenberger

Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 11:12 AM

To: WISPA General List

Subject: Re: [WISPA] Pole-mounted base stations

 

Our APs are generally on dedicated poles. We did work a deal with a
neighbor

PUD to mount some equipment on their primary poles, in which case we had to

maintain proper clearances from the power and communication space.  Mounts

depend on the radio. Sometimes we just use a radio shack offset mast

bracket, we've used a lot MTI brackets because they bolt right up to
Trango,

and we've pipe-straped a metal mast to the top of the wood pole. I'll be

working at a couple sites this week, I'll snap some pictures.

 

Here are the MTI brackets:

http://www.mtiwe.com/UserFiles/Image/MTI/Enclosure_Units/big/MT-120018-and-
M

T-120018A%5B1%5D.jpg

 

-Paul

 

On Jul 27, 2010, at 11:32 AM, Fred Goldstein wrote:

 

  At 7/27/2010 02:12 PM, you wrote:

  We ourselves are an electric co-op and ISP, most of our towers are

  65ft poles. If your local co-op is friendly, it's a good way to go.

 

  Thanks... I think the ccop will be friendly enough, where they have

  poles. I've tried to locate nodes along pole routes when

  possible.  Some back roads don't have poles, though, so we may need

  to put up our own.

 

  Most antenna mounts want to be on a 1-3 inch metal pole.  What

  hardware do you use to attach to the wood pole?  And do you ever put

  antennas above the primaries, on a nonconductive mount, or do you

  always stay down in the safe zone?  Thanks...

 

  -Paul

 

  On Jul 19, 2010, at 1:23 PM, Fred R. Goldstein wrote:

 

  A design I'm working on is in a hilly wooded rural/resort area, not

  farmland.  It will need a fair number (perhaps a few dozen) sites to

  cover the planned turf.  Each node will need both backhaul (mesh, in

  the loose sense) and access antennas.  The obvious place to put these

  is atop utility poles.  I think the local electric cooperative will

  cooperate and let us rent pole space.  We may however need to put

  additional poles in some places.  They seem cheaper than metal towers

  and are less likely to raise the locals' eyebrows.

 

  Does anyone out there have experience with this sort of

  arrangement?  We're in the budgeting stage now.  I have an idea what

  the radios cost but the installation might be the bigger deal.  The

  big engineering firms are more used to fancy cellular and fiber

  installs, not WISP-style radios.  So we may also want to bring in

  someone with this kind of WISP experience to do some consulting or

  setup with us too.  Thanks.

 

 

  --

  Fred Goldsteink1io   fgoldstein at ionary.com

  ionary Consulting  http://www.ionary.com/

  +1 617 795 2701 

 

 

 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!

http://signup.wispa.org/




 

WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] USF Reform Bill Introduced - The most compelling reason to document and map your network coverage ever

2010-07-28 Thread Fred Goldstein

At 7/28/2010 12:59 PM, you wrote:

- would reduce or deny support to wireline incumbents in areas where 
at least 75% of households can receive voice and broadband from a 
competitive provider that does not receive support


Ø  Now the way I read the above statement is that if a WISP covers 
75% of a current USF recipients service area, there will no longer 
be eligibility to receive USF funds. Remember if they have broadband 
they also have access to many VOIP providers even if you do not 
provide VOIP services. Vonage and Skype come to mind, not to mention 
cellular coverage. This would be a huge factor in leveling the 
playing field for WISP's in rural markets!


That is the way I see it too!


I don't.  See page 22 of the bill (scanned version only on line, 
alas; emphasis added):


...the Commission determines that at least 75% of the households can 
purchase **wireline** voice service and **wired** high-speed 
broadband service from an unsupported, facilities-based, 
non-incumbent provider...


There's also a reference further down (p24) to voice service of 
standard quality.  That rules out Skype or any non-QoS-enabled VoIP 
platform, or any non-PSTN non-E.164 service.  If this were the only 
issue though, it would be easy enough to provide a technical fix.


The rule appears aimed at cable.  If there is unsubsidized 
PacketCable telephony, then why should the FCC subsidize ILECs?


There's also support in the bill for mobile wireless 
providers.  Over the past decade, CMRS carriers have been the largest 
(by far) competitive ETCs.  Current FCC plans phase this out.  The 
largest recipients are ATT and Verizon, the latter via its Alltel / 
Western Wireless purchase.  The Boucher (D-Verizon) bill instead 
allows CMRSs to bid to become the supported mobile carrier in a given area.


There are various other goodies (if you're Verizon) in the bill, 
including an order that the FCC complete intercarrier compensation 
reform within a year (it has been an open docket since April, 2001, 
and each Commission seems to want to pass the ball to its successor 
rather than do anything).  And section 303 apparently bans access 
revenue sharing, so the free conference call industry goes out of 
business.  I guess we'll all have to move our conference calls to the 
Internet.  This is a real pain, but VZ, ATT and Sprint don't want to 
pay the teensy bit that it costs them (though it helps encourage the 
sale of overpriced flat-rate usage plans).


The bill adds USF taxes to WISPs and basically prohibits them from 
receiving anything.  This is consistent with the FCC's current pay 
for the bullet proposal.  Such a deal!


 --
 Fred Goldsteink1io   fgoldstein at ionary.com
 ionary Consulting  http://www.ionary.com/
 +1 617 795 2701 


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik User Meeting

2010-07-28 Thread Scott Reed
MUM is not for training, but MT is offering several courses the same 
week as MUM.  I think at the same venue.
I went to MUM Dallas last year.  It is worth while.  Though not for 
training, I did learn a lot.  There were several presentations on new 
things and there were presentations on new ways to use the old things.
I also was able to meet a bunch of folks from the maillists I 
participate in.  Though I was not able to make the WISPA event in St 
Louis, from what I heard there was a lot more going on there than at a 
MUM.  Still for the price, I did find it worthwhile and hope to attend 
again this year.


Josh Luthman wrote:
MUM is not for training.  MUM is similar to Animal Farm if you've been 
there.  It's more of a trade show and has a few presentations on how 
some people use Mikrotik.


If you want training I'd suggest Butch Evans' classes.  I found the 
basic class to be very informative even knowing quite a bit of the 
material.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373


On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Paul Gerstenberger pa...@hrec.coop 
mailto:pa...@hrec.coop wrote:


Has anyone attended the MUM's? What were your impressions? I'm
thinking of going this year, curious what to expect. I've
integrated mikrotik into our production network and so far it's
working well, be nice to have a little official training though.

-Paul




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/







WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org


Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--
Scott Reed
Sr. Systems Engineer
GAB Midwest
1-800-363-1544 x2241
1-260-827-2241
Cell: 260-273-7239




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Pole-mounted base stations

2010-07-28 Thread Fred Goldstein

At 7/28/2010 02:46 PM, you wrote:

Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary==_NextPart_000_00FB_01CB2E52.D6C23980
Content-Language: en-us

Not sure if this Wind Turbine is small enough or cheap enough for 
you but 12V 20A $490:

http://www.beezwaxproducts.com/product_info.php?products_id=49http://www.beezwaxproducts.com/product_info.php?products_id=49


Yes, that's exactly the kind of thing I had in mind.  Especially 
since the non-metallic blades only have a 3' diameter.  Stick a good 
deep discharge battery in a box with the charge controller and it 
should be able to power a nice Routerboard arrangement, maybe with 
some Ethernet radios on the side.  The fun will be mounting 
everything on the pole.  Questions like who gets the top, the antenna 
or the windmill?  (Probably the turbine, so it can move with the wind.)


 --
 Fred Goldsteink1io   fgoldstein at ionary.com
 ionary Consulting  http://www.ionary.com/
 +1 617 795 2701 


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Off-net rebooting

2010-07-28 Thread Kristian Hoffmann
Good point, but that's not the problem in our case.  We also noticed
that the ON sequence delay setting affects the cycle time as well.
The default setting is often too fast and won't actually powercycle PoE
powered MikroTik devices.  We've found that changing that setting to
5-10 seconds works much better.

-Kristian

On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 10:55 -0700, Forbes Mercy wrote:
 Most common mistake made with the Web Power Switch units is the default 
 is to leave plugs off when losing power, we change those settings to 
 restore to previous state on power loss, problem solved.  Don't forget 
 to save changes.
 
 Forbes
 
 On 7/28/2010 10:26 AM, Kristian Hoffmann wrote:
  Thanks for making me think about it.  Last night at 7:30 we had a tower
  go down.  Cause...web power switch failed and shut off all the plugs.  I
  guess we'll have to try the battery trick.
 
  -Kristian
 
  On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 19:36 -0700, Kristian Hoffmann wrote:
 
  We've had almost as many dispatches to fix/replace broken DLI web power
  switches as we have saved dispatches from being able to remotely reboot
  devices.  At this point, we have half a dozen on the shelf that I'm
  reluctant to send out in the field.
 
  On the other hand, we have some older units (pre autoping) that have
  been running for 2-3 years in hot nasty environments.  I wish we could
  figure out what was causing the failures because, in theory, they're
  good units and reasonably priced.
 
  -- 
  Kristian Hoffmann
  System Administrator
  kh...@fire2wire.com
  http://www.fire2wire.com
 
  Office - 209-543-1800 | Fax - 209-545-1469 | Toll Free - 800-905-FIRE
 
 
  On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 19:36 -0400, Gino Villarini wrote:
   
  Anyone has experience with the webpower switch? Good ? bad ?
 
  Gino A. Villarini
  g...@aeronetpr.com
  Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
  787.273.4143
 
  -Original Message-
  From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
  Behalf Of Cameron Crum
  Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 6:32 PM
  To: WISPA General List
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] Off-net rebooting
 
  Mine quit responding so i called in...they told me they no longer
  supported the paging protocol those units used.
 
  On Tuesday, July 27, 2010, Chuck Profitocprof...@cv-access.com  wrote:
 
  http://www.digitalloggers.com/lpc.html
 
  This is the small one, there is a larger one, both have auto ping for off
  line rebooting.  We have them on all ap / tower sites.   They a have 
  saved a
  trip up the hill many a night! no monthly fee.
  Also, put a old CB-3 into the surge side of a battery backup and your
  network auto ping will know EXACTLY when the power goes down, and you 
  know
  how long the batteries will last.
 
 
  Chuck Profito
  209-988-7388
  CV-Access, Inc.
  www.cv-access.com / cprofito'at'cv-access.com
  Providing Broadband Internet Access to
  California's Rural Central Valley
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
  Behalf Of Mike Hammett
  Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 10:41 AM
  To: WISPA General List
  Subject: [WISPA] Off-net rebooting
 
 What are you guys doing for off-net rebooting?  I know someone at
  WISPCON years back had a pager based system.  I'm sure there are
  cellular based systems now, but I'm not sure how the cost compares.
 
  --
 
 
  -
  Mike Hammett
  Intelligent Computing Solutions
  http://www.ics-il.com
 
 
 
 
  
  
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
  
  
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
  
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
  
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
   
 
  
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
  
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
  
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
  
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 

Re: [WISPA] Lightening protection

2010-07-28 Thread Scott Lambert
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 07:59:25PM -0500, Philip Dorr wrote:
 Isn't that how towers are supposed to be grounded? Three ground rods
 one at each leg, 3+ feet away, hooked together in a loop and attached
 to each leg of the tower.  When you have guy wires are't you supposed
 to do the same between them?

The ground rods should be twice as far apart as they are long.  If
you drive an 8 foot ground rod, your next nearest ground rod should
be 16 feet from that one, according to the Polyphaser book.  If you
drive 16 foot rods, space them 32 feet apart.

I suggest everyone read the book.  Don't guess.  A couple of rods
cost about as much as the book and you're wasting rods.

We put a rod connected to each leg of our first tower.  Swept up
the little bitty plastic and silicon pieces three times the first
spring it was up before I got the book and added three more rods
16 ft from each of the original three.

The original three worked like about 1.25 ground rods.  Now it works
like 4.25 ground rods.  We haven't blown anything apart on that
tower in the 4 years since.  

Of course, we haven't had a strike in the two years I've had a
strike counter on it.  Maybe strike counters ward off strikes?

We don't put fewer than 6 rods on a tower.  The first rod is 16
feet from the tower leg.  That's tied to another rod 32 feet from
the tower leg.  If we can, we tie all the rods together in halos.

A ham I field day with manages towers for the forest service.  He
says they do three ring halos of ground rods around each tower.

 On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Cameron Crum cc...@wispmon.com wrote:
  We grounded all our towers the same as mike...3 rods in a triangle
  about 10 ft out in each direction.

Probably works about like 2.5 ground rods worth of dissipation
ability without running the math.

  On Tuesday, July 27, 2010, Mike m...@aweiowa.com wrote:
  Oh yeah, I usually ground with a triad of rods in an equilateral
  triangle at least 8 feet apart, and never a single rod.

Sounds like about 2 ground rods worth of dissipation ability without
running the math.

-- 
Scott LambertKC5MLE   Unix SysAdmin
lamb...@lambertfam.org




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Lightening protection

2010-07-28 Thread jp

Make sure the tower is grounded to the electrical system ground as well.

Sort of like every house is grounded with a lightning rod, but uses the 
electrical system ground also. 

On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 09:18:04AM -0600, Mark Dueck wrote:
 I've been wanting to ask this question for a few days.
 
 We got hit on one of our NOCs with about 6 radios on the tower. Every
 single radio was fried.  Our problem I think is that it's a limestone
 (caliche or white marl) hill.  How well can you ground in a situation
 like that?  Or does it not matter?  We had all our POE's properly
 grounded, but did not run separate ground from the radios as they were
 all Tranzeo with metal back plate, metal mount, mounted directly on the
 legs of the tower.  The tower has a grounding rod at the bottom, but it
 goes directly into the limestone.
 
 Any suggestions?
 
 On 07/27/2010 08:29 AM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
  I had a problem customer than was always getting CPE Ethernet knocked out.
  Switched to shielded CAT5 with a pac wireless POE adapter that grounds the
  jacket through the 3rd prong ground of the house plug and problem went away.
  Also it helps if the pole the the CPE is mounted to is grounded as well. If
  its on a roof you may have to run a ground wire to the pole to dissipate
  static.
 
  Kurt Fankhauser
  WAVELINC
  P.O. Box 126
  Bucyrus, OH 44820
  419-562-6405
  www.wavelinc.com
   
   
 
  -Original Message-
  From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
  Behalf Of Jeremie Chism
  Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 9:54 AM
  To: WISPA General List
  Subject: [WISPA] Lightening protection
 
  I had two cpe's get struck by lightening yesterday that took out the
  cpe, the router behind it and the voip adapter behind that. Along with
  a few Ethernet cards also. What are you using on the customers end to
  try to stop this. The cpe is powered by poe.
 
  Sent from my iPhone
 
 
  
  
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
  
  
   
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
  
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
  
   
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 

 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

-- 
/*
Jason Philbrook   |   Midcoast Internet Solutions - Wireless and DSL
KB1IOJ|   Broadband Internet Access, Dialup, and Hosting 
 http://f64.nu/   |   for Midcoast Mainehttp://www.midcoast.com/
*/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] CPE Monitoring Survey

2010-07-28 Thread Jon Auer
I was thinking about CPE monitoring today and wondering if/how everyone is
doing it.

I've got a brief (8 easy questions) survey at http://bit.ly/cpesurvey

If you can spare a minute or two to fill it out I'd be very grateful.
Of course, the results will be shared in aggregate.
Thanks!



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

[WISPA] Health Insurance

2010-07-28 Thread Rick Harnish
I am curious about all the small operators out there.  What are you doing
for Health Insurance?  Do you have individual policies?  Are you on your
wife's policy?  Is there a need for a WISPA Group Health Insurance Plan?  

 

I will be investigating this topic over the next few weeks.  I will most
likely send out a survey in a week or two once I get together with an
underwriter and see what the feasibility is.  Between now and then, I would
like to encourage discussion to see whether it is worth our effort.

 

My goal is to offer a group plan that will assist those who do not have
enough employees to justify an in-house group plan for their employees or
themselves.  Hopefully, we can reduce your cost and improve your coverage.

 

Respectfully,

 

Rick Harnish

President

WISPA

260-307-4000 cell

866-317-2851 WISPA Office

Skype: rick.harnish.

rharn...@wispa.org

 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

[WISPA] High Speed Bridge

2010-07-28 Thread Kosinet Wireless
Gentlemen,

I need opinions...

We have an opportunity to provide a short term / high speed link for an
event - They need 20 Meg Internet speed. We've got the bandwidth, and
locations scoped out, just curious as to experirnce with radios.

Currently looking at using the LigoPTP 5-23 units. Any experience? Good or
bad?

Also considering the new Ubiquity units as price is always a problem.

Thanks in advance,

-Gary-




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge

2010-07-28 Thread Glenn Kelley
distance? 


On Jul 28, 2010, at 5:45 PM, Kosinet Wireless wrote:

 Gentlemen,
 
 I need opinions...
 
 We have an opportunity to provide a short term / high speed link for an
 event - They need 20 Meg Internet speed. We've got the bandwidth, and
 locations scoped out, just curious as to experirnce with radios.
 
 Currently looking at using the LigoPTP 5-23 units. Any experience? Good or
 bad?
 
 Also considering the new Ubiquity units as price is always a problem.
 
 Thanks in advance,
 
 -Gary-
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

_
Glenn Kelley | Principle | HostMedic |www.HostMedic.com 
  Email: gl...@hostmedic.com
Pplease don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge

2010-07-28 Thread Josh Luthman
What kind of distance?  I assume you have LOS?

I would go with Ubiquity probably.  150 megs aggregate for $200 is
very convenient for building to building bridges.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373



On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Kosinet Wireless wirel...@kosinet.com wrote:
 Gentlemen,

 I need opinions...

 We have an opportunity to provide a short term / high speed link for an
 event - They need 20 Meg Internet speed. We've got the bandwidth, and
 locations scoped out, just curious as to experirnce with radios.

 Currently looking at using the LigoPTP 5-23 units. Any experience? Good or
 bad?

 Also considering the new Ubiquity units as price is always a problem.

 Thanks in advance,

 -Gary-



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Health Insurance

2010-07-28 Thread Mark Nash - Lists
We provide health insurance for employees.  To keep absolute costs down, we go 
with a high deductible for our employees, though to offset the costs in the 
cast of anything major, we pay the first $1000 of the deductible on behalf of 
the employee.

We have 5 employees.  Owners have to pay for their own or get insurance 
elsewhere.

- Original Message - 
  From: Rick Harnish 
  To: 'WISPA General List' ; memb...@wispa.org ; motor...@afmug.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 2:40 PM
  Subject: [WISPA] Health Insurance


  I am curious about all the small operators out there.  What are you doing for 
Health Insurance?  Do you have individual policies?  Are you on your wife's 
policy?  Is there a need for a WISPA Group Health Insurance Plan?  

   

  I will be investigating this topic over the next few weeks.  I will most 
likely send out a survey in a week or two once I get together with an 
underwriter and see what the feasibility is.  Between now and then, I would 
like to encourage discussion to see whether it is worth our effort.

   

  My goal is to offer a group plan that will assist those who do not have 
enough employees to justify an in-house group plan for their employees or 
themselves.  Hopefully, we can reduce your cost and improve your coverage.

   

  Respectfully,

   

  Rick Harnish

  President

  WISPA

  260-307-4000 cell

  866-317-2851 WISPA Office

  Skype: rick.harnish.

  rharn...@wispa.org

   



--




  

  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
  

   
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Health Insurance

2010-07-28 Thread Mark Nash - Lists
though something major could include a cast, I mean to say in the CASE of 
anything major ;)

And owners pay for their own because we are an LLC.  As I understand it, if 
you're a different type of entity such as a C-Corp, you are an employee 
therefore you can get health insurance paid just like an employee.  LLC members 
are not employees.
  - Original Message - 
  From: Mark Nash - Lists 
  To: WISPA General List 
  Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 2:57 PM
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] Health Insurance


  We provide health insurance for employees.  To keep absolute costs down, we 
go with a high deductible for our employees, though to offset the costs in the 
cast of anything major, we pay the first $1000 of the deductible on behalf of 
the employee.

  We have 5 employees.  Owners have to pay for their own or get insurance 
elsewhere.

  - Original Message - 
From: Rick Harnish 
To: 'WISPA General List' ; memb...@wispa.org ; motor...@afmug.com 
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 2:40 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Health Insurance


I am curious about all the small operators out there.  What are you doing 
for Health Insurance?  Do you have individual policies?  Are you on your wife's 
policy?  Is there a need for a WISPA Group Health Insurance Plan?  

 

I will be investigating this topic over the next few weeks.  I will most 
likely send out a survey in a week or two once I get together with an 
underwriter and see what the feasibility is.  Between now and then, I would 
like to encourage discussion to see whether it is worth our effort.

 

My goal is to offer a group plan that will assist those who do not have 
enough employees to justify an in-house group plan for their employees or 
themselves.  Hopefully, we can reduce your cost and improve your coverage.

 

Respectfully,

 

Rick Harnish

President

WISPA

260-307-4000 cell

866-317-2851 WISPA Office

Skype: rick.harnish.

rharn...@wispa.org

 










WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--




  

  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
  

   
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Pole-mounted base stations

2010-07-28 Thread Scott Parsons
The small wind turbines perform best if you can get them to the top.

Air turbulence near the ground causes the turbine output to drop but get up
40-60 feet and the wind stream is steadier and the turbine more consistent.

e-zy.net

PH: 801-432-0098

FAX: 801-618-4220

sc...@e-zy.net

www.e-zy.net

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Fred Goldstein
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 1:10 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Pole-mounted base stations

 

At 7/28/2010 02:46 PM, you wrote:



Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary==_NextPart_000_00FB_01CB2E52.D6C23980
Content-Language: en-us

Not sure if this Wind Turbine is small enough or cheap enough for you but
12V 20A $490:
 http://www.beezwaxproducts.com/product_info.php?products_id=49
http://www.beezwaxproducts.com/product_info.php?products_id=49


Yes, that's exactly the kind of thing I had in mind.  Especially since the
non-metallic blades only have a 3' diameter.  Stick a good deep discharge
battery in a box with the charge controller and it should be able to power a
nice Routerboard arrangement, maybe with some Ethernet radios on the side.
The fun will be mounting everything on the pole.  Questions like who gets
the top, the antenna or the windmill?  (Probably the turbine, so it can move
with the wind.)



 --
 Fred Goldsteink1io   fgoldstein at ionary.com   
 ionary Consultinghttp://www.ionary.com/ 
 +1 617 795 2701




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik User Meeting

2010-07-28 Thread Justin Wilson
The MUM is one of those yoy get what you pay for.  Genrally you get
enough out of it to justify going.  Butch is correct in the training.  The
heavy accents can be a problem.  A buddy of mine took their training in
Chicago and found it difficult to communicate his questions correctly so
they would understand.
-- 
Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
http://www.mtin.net/blog
Wisp Consulting ­ Tower Climbing ­ Network Support



From: Butch Evans but...@butchevans.com
Organization: Butch Evans Consulting
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:41:30 -0500
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik User Meeting

On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 09:24 -0700, Paul Gerstenberger wrote:
 Has anyone attended the MUM's? What were your impressions?
 I'm thinking of going this year, curious what to expect. I've
 integrated mikrotik into our production network and so far
 it's working well, be nice to have a little official training
 though.

I have a training class scheduled for next week (see
http://store.wispgear.net/ for details).  Mikrotik's official training
(from the reviews I've seen) don't get very good reviews, due to the
difficulty people have in understanding what they are saying...

As for the MUM, they are generally pretty good shows.  I've never heard
anyone say they were disappointed for having attended.

-- 

* Butch Evans   * Professional Network Consultation*
* http://www.butchevans.com/* Network Engineering  *
* http://store.wispgear.net/* Wired or Wireless Networks   *
* http://blog.butchevans.com/   * ImageStream, Mikrotik and MORE!  *






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Health Insurance

2010-07-28 Thread David Weddell
I know that we are constantly battling pricing in health insurance. We would be 
interested in how we could participate in a WISPA group plan and with 60+ 
employees and families that we cover, you can imagine our monthly premium. I 
would assume that in an association plan, the more that participate, the better 
rates could be negotiated. We would be interested in helping with negotiations 
if needed. I believe this is a great idea and could benefit WISPA as a whole 
and encourage membership as well.


Regards,
David Weddell
VP Business Development 
Corporate Partnerships
Omnicity, Inc.

www.omnicity.net
OTCMarkets: OMCY

866 586 1518 Corporate Office
765 499 7310 Cell


From: members-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:members-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of 
Rick Harnish
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 5:40 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'; memb...@wispa.org; motor...@afmug.com
Subject: [WISPA Members] Health Insurance

I am curious about all the small operators out there.  What are you doing for 
Health Insurance?  Do you have individual policies?  Are you on your wife's 
policy?  Is there a need for a WISPA Group Health Insurance Plan?

I will be investigating this topic over the next few weeks.  I will most likely 
send out a survey in a week or two once I get together with an underwriter and 
see what the feasibility is.  Between now and then, I would like to encourage 
discussion to see whether it is worth our effort.

My goal is to offer a group plan that will assist those who do not have enough 
employees to justify an in-house group plan for their employees or themselves.  
Hopefully, we can reduce your cost and improve your coverage.

Respectfully,

Rick Harnish
President
WISPA
260-307-4000 cell
866-317-2851 WISPA Office
Skype: rick.harnish.
rharn...@wispa.org




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge

2010-07-28 Thread Jeremie Chism
Except for one bad one, the nanobridge works very well.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 28, 2010, at 4:49 PM, Glenn Kelley gl...@hostmedic.com wrote:

distance?


On Jul 28, 2010, at 5:45 PM, Kosinet Wireless wrote:

Gentlemen,

I need opinions...

We have an opportunity to provide a short term / high speed link for an
event - They need 20 Meg Internet speed. We've got the bandwidth, and
locations scoped out, just curious as to experirnce with radios.

Currently looking at using the LigoPTP 5-23 units. Any experience? Good or
bad?

Also considering the new Ubiquity units as price is always a problem.

Thanks in advance,

-Gary-




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


_
*Glenn Kelley | Principle | HostMedic |www.HostMedic.com *
  Email: gl...@hostmedic.com
Pplease don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] USF Reform Bill Introduced - The most compelling reason to document and map your network coverage ever

2010-07-28 Thread Cameron Crum
Also,

Keep in mind that we offer free 477 data prep in a program on our web site.
Go to www.wispmon.com and click on the FCC  477 Util.. You can even download
a free desktop geocoder to pre-geocode your data (makes things go a little
faster in the form prep). No proprietary info has to be given. We don't
share data with anyone, ever. There is some prep work involved on your end,
but it would have to be done regardless of how you chose to get the data.
Instructions for use are on the page.

Regards,

Cameron

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Fred Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.comwrote:

  At 7/28/2010 12:59 PM, you wrote:

 *- would reduce or deny support to wireline incumbents in areas where at
 least 75% of households can receive voice and broadband from a competitive
 provider that does not receive support
 *
 Ø  Now the way I read the above statement is that if a WISP covers 75% of a
 current USF recipients service area, there will no longer be eligibility to
 receive USF funds. Remember if they have broadband they also have access to
 many VOIP providers even if you do not provide VOIP services. Vonage and
 Skype come to mind, not to mention cellular coverage. *This would be a
 huge factor in leveling the playing field for WISP’s in rural markets!
 *
 That is the way I see it too!


 I don't.  See page 22 of the bill (scanned version only on line, alas;
 emphasis added):

 ...the Commission determines that at least 75% of the households can
 purchase **wireline** voice service and **wired** high-speed broadband
 service from an unsupported, facilities-based, non-incumbent provider...

 There's also a reference further down (p24) to voice service of standard
 quality.  That rules out Skype or any non-QoS-enabled VoIP platform, or any
 non-PSTN non-E.164 service.  If this were the only issue though, it would be
 easy enough to provide a technical fix.

 The rule appears aimed at cable.  If there is unsubsidized PacketCable
 telephony, then why should the FCC subsidize ILECs?

 There's also support in the bill for mobile wireless providers.  Over the
 past decade, CMRS carriers have been the largest (by far) competitive ETCs.
 Current FCC plans phase this out.  The largest recipients are ATT and
 Verizon, the latter via its Alltel / Western Wireless purchase.  The Boucher
 (D-Verizon) bill instead allows CMRSs to bid to become the supported mobile
 carrier in a given area.

 There are various other goodies (if you're Verizon) in the bill, including
 an order that the FCC complete intercarrier compensation reform within a
 year (it has been an open docket since April, 2001, and each Commission
 seems to want to pass the ball to its successor rather than do anything).
 And section 303 apparently bans access revenue sharing, so the free
 conference call industry goes out of business.  I guess we'll all have to
 move our conference calls to the Internet.  This is a real pain, but VZ, ATT
 and Sprint don't want to pay the teensy bit that it costs them (though it
 helps encourage the sale of overpriced flat-rate usage plans).

 The bill adds USF taxes to WISPs and basically prohibits them from
 receiving anything.  This is consistent with the FCC's current pay for the
 bullet proposal.  Such a deal!

  --
  Fred Goldsteink1io   fgoldstein at ionary.com
  ionary Consultinghttp://www.ionary.com/
  +1 617 795 2701




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge

2010-07-28 Thread KosiNet Wireless
Sorry for not giving all the details.

The long shot is about 6.5 miles - Good LOS - We'll also be doing two (less 
than) 1 miles shots to get it there - All good LOS. Probably going to end up 
using 6 Radios to get the job done.


- Original Message - 
From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 5:49 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge


 What kind of distance?  I assume you have LOS?

 I would go with Ubiquity probably.  150 megs aggregate for $200 is
 very convenient for building to building bridges.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373



 On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Kosinet Wireless wirel...@kosinet.com 
 wrote:
 Gentlemen,

 I need opinions...

 We have an opportunity to provide a short term / high speed link for an
 event - They need 20 Meg Internet speed. We've got the bandwidth, and
 locations scoped out, just curious as to experirnce with radios.

 Currently looking at using the LigoPTP 5-23 units. Any experience? Good 
 or
 bad?

 Also considering the new Ubiquity units as price is always a problem.

 Thanks in advance,

 -Gary-



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge

2010-07-28 Thread KosiNet Wireless
And the bad thing would be.

-Gary-
  - Original Message - 
  From: Jeremie Chism 
  To: WISPA General List 
  Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 7:32 PM
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge


  Except for one bad one, the nanobridge works very well. 

  Sent from my iPhone

  On Jul 28, 2010, at 4:49 PM, Glenn Kelley gl...@hostmedic.com wrote:


distance? 




On Jul 28, 2010, at 5:45 PM, Kosinet Wireless wrote:


  Gentlemen,

  I need opinions...

  We have an opportunity to provide a short term / high speed link for an
  event - They need 20 Meg Internet speed. We've got the bandwidth, and
  locations scoped out, just curious as to experirnce with radios.

  Currently looking at using the LigoPTP 5-23 units. Any experience? Good or
  bad?

  Also considering the new Ubiquity units as price is always a problem.

  Thanks in advance,

  -Gary-



  

  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
  


  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




_
Glenn Kelley | Principle | HostMedic |www.HostMedic.com 
  Email: gl...@hostmedic.com
Pplease don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--




  

  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
  

   
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Health Insurance

2010-07-28 Thread Bret Clark
We went through an independent broker who essentially had created a
small business group plan of area businesses that help keep cost down
verses us going to the insurer ourselves. Another thing to consider is
Health Savings Accounts (HSA) which are a lot less then regular health
insurance but at least affords some piece of mind for employees in the
event they are faced with a serious medical or health issue. 

Bret

On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 19:07 -0400, David Weddell wrote:
 I know that we are constantly battling pricing in health insurance. We
 would be interested in how we could participate in a “WISPA” group
 plan and with 60+ employees and families that we cover, you can
 imagine our monthly premium. I would assume that in an association
 plan, the more that participate, the better rates could be negotiated.
 We would be interested in helping with negotiations if needed. I
 believe this is a great idea and could benefit WISPA as a whole and
 encourage membership as well. 
 
  
 
  
 
 Regards,
 
 David Weddell
 
 VP Business Development 
 
 Corporate Partnerships
 
 Omnicity, Inc.
 
  
 
 www.omnicity.net
 
 OTCMarkets: OMCY
 
  
 
 866 586 1518 Corporate Office
 
 765 499 7310 Cell
 
  
 
  
 
 
 From: members-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:members-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Rick Harnish
 Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 5:40 PM
 To: 'WISPA General List'; memb...@wispa.org; motor...@afmug.com
 Subject: [WISPA Members] Health Insurance
 
 
 
  
 
 I am curious about all the small operators out there.  What are you
 doing for Health Insurance?  Do you have individual policies?  Are you
 on your wife’s policy?  Is there a need for a WISPA Group Health
 Insurance Plan?  
 
  
 
 I will be investigating this topic over the next few weeks.  I will
 most likely send out a survey in a week or two once I get together
 with an underwriter and see what the feasibility is.  Between now and
 then, I would like to encourage discussion to see whether it is worth
 our effort.
 
  
 
 My goal is to offer a group plan that will assist those who do not
 have enough employees to justify an in-house group plan for their
 employees or themselves.  Hopefully, we can reduce your cost and
 improve your coverage.
 
  
 
 Respectfully,
 
  
 
 Rick Harnish
 
 President
 
 WISPA
 
 260-307-4000 cell
 
 866-317-2851 WISPA Office
 
 Skype: rick.harnish.
 
 rharn...@wispa.org
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge

2010-07-28 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
6.5 miles long shot... I would do with either a Rocket M5 + Rocket Dish 
or a PowerBridge M5 (available in us next week or so).
The smaller shots you could use NanoBridges M5 or even the NanoStation 
M5 or even the NanoStationLoco M...
Ligowave units appear to be very nice, but hard to tell if the cost 
difference between Rocket M5 + Dish vs them is justifiable.

If you did not want to purchase a whole variety of stuff , you could 
easily do this via a bunch of Bullet M5's with 22db Panels as well.

Overall Bullets will have less thruput but still will get you your 20meg 
+ easily.

BTW, on the UBNT.COM now has a calculator / estimator... you can 
determine what models will work well for you.

http://ubnt.com/linkcalculator/

Lots of good choices, the gear works well, takes a little playing with 
and getting used to.. but then again what doesn't

Regards.

Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet  Telecom

On 7/28/2010 7:46 PM, KosiNet Wireless wrote:
 Sorry for not giving all the details.

 The long shot is about 6.5 miles - Good LOS - We'll also be doing two (less
 than) 1 miles shots to get it there - All good LOS. Probably going to end up
 using 6 Radios to get the job done.


 - Original Message -
 From: Josh Luthmanj...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 5:49 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge



 What kind of distance?  I assume you have LOS?

 I would go with Ubiquity probably.  150 megs aggregate for $200 is
 very convenient for building to building bridges.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373



 On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Kosinet Wirelesswirel...@kosinet.com
 wrote:
  
 Gentlemen,

 I need opinions...

 We have an opportunity to provide a short term / high speed link for an
 event - They need 20 Meg Internet speed. We've got the bandwidth, and
 locations scoped out, just curious as to experirnce with radios.

 Currently looking at using the LigoPTP 5-23 units. Any experience? Good
 or
 bad?

 Also considering the new Ubiquity units as price is always a problem.

 Thanks in advance,

 -Gary-



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

  


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge

2010-07-28 Thread Jeremie Chism
I had one end go bad. Replaced it and no problems.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 28, 2010, at 6:46 PM, KosiNet Wireless wirel...@kosinet.com
wrote:

And the bad thing would be.

-Gary-

- Original Message -
*From:* Jeremie Chism jchi...@gmail.com
*To:* WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 28, 2010 7:32 PM
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge

Except for one bad one, the nanobridge works very well.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 28, 2010, at 4:49 PM, Glenn Kelley gl...@hostmedic.com wrote:

 distance?


 On Jul 28, 2010, at 5:45 PM, Kosinet Wireless wrote:

 Gentlemen,

I need opinions...

We have an opportunity to provide a short term / high speed link for an
event - They need 20 Meg Internet speed. We've got the bandwidth, and
locations scoped out, just curious as to experirnce with radios.

Currently looking at using the LigoPTP 5-23 units. Any experience? Good or
bad?

Also considering the new Ubiquity units as price is always a problem.

Thanks in advance,

-Gary-




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.orgwireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



_
*Glenn Kelley | Principle | HostMedic |www.HostMedic.com *
  Email: gl...@hostmedic.comgl...@hostmedic.com
Pplease don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.orgwireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 --




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

[WISPA] Suggestions Request.

2010-07-28 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
Hello,

I could use some suggestions / field experience...

We need to setup wifi for a medium sized apartment complex. We need to 
deliver Wifi for about 8-12 apt. spread throughout the complex. (The apt 
complex is about the size of a city block).

We have done a field test / proof of concept with Meraki radios (only 
because I had them on the shelf), cannot do Ruckus (budget will not 
afford this).

.. Mesh will do the job, but looking for radios with a bit more oomph 
than the Merai mini's.

I was looking at using Ubiqiti Picostation 2HP flashed with Open-mesh 
... but am concerned about folks on UBNT forum reporting strange 
coverage gap in the 20-50ft range

I understand that there are some Engenius radios that will work with 
open mesh as well... ( radios need to be outdoor type).

Any suggestions ? or opinions on PicoStation 2HP or Engenious Radios 
(please let me know what model #) and or the Open Mesh setup.

Many Thanks in Advance.

-- 
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet  Telecom





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Suggestions Request.

2010-07-28 Thread Robert West
Pico all the way.  Ubiquiti can do this with minimum budget.

Bob-


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 8:18 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Suggestions Request.

Hello,

I could use some suggestions / field experience...

We need to setup wifi for a medium sized apartment complex. We need to
deliver Wifi for about 8-12 apt. spread throughout the complex. (The apt
complex is about the size of a city block).

We have done a field test / proof of concept with Meraki radios (only
because I had them on the shelf), cannot do Ruckus (budget will not afford
this).

.. Mesh will do the job, but looking for radios with a bit more oomph than
the Merai mini's.

I was looking at using Ubiqiti Picostation 2HP flashed with Open-mesh ...
but am concerned about folks on UBNT forum reporting strange coverage gap in
the 20-50ft range

I understand that there are some Engenius radios that will work with open
mesh as well... ( radios need to be outdoor type).

Any suggestions ? or opinions on PicoStation 2HP or Engenious Radios (please
let me know what model #) and or the Open Mesh setup.

Many Thanks in Advance.

--
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet  Telecom






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Health Insurance

2010-07-28 Thread Robert West
Health Insurance?

 

Hey, George!  (In Canada)

 

What kind of budget to you have for health insurance?  

 

Me-

 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Bret Clark
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 7:56 PM
To: WISPA General List
Cc: memb...@wispa.org; motor...@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Health Insurance

 

We went through an independent broker who essentially had created a small 
business group plan of area businesses that help keep cost down verses us going 
to the insurer ourselves. Another thing to consider is Health Savings Accounts 
(HSA) which are a lot less then regular health insurance but at least affords 
some piece of mind for employees in the event they are faced with a serious 
medical or health issue. 

Bret

On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 19:07 -0400, David Weddell wrote: 

I know that we are constantly battling pricing in health insurance. We would be 
interested in how we could participate in a “WISPA” group plan and with 60+ 
employees and families that we cover, you can imagine our monthly premium. I 
would assume that in an association plan, the more that participate, the better 
rates could be negotiated. We would be interested in helping with negotiations 
if needed. I believe this is a great idea and could benefit WISPA as a whole 
and encourage membership as well. 

 

 

Regards,

David Weddell

VP Business Development 

Corporate Partnerships

Omnicity, Inc.

 

www.omnicity.net

OTCMarkets: OMCY

 

866 586 1518 Corporate Office

765 499 7310 Cell

 

 

From: members-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:members-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of 
Rick Harnish
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 5:40 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'; memb...@wispa.org; motor...@afmug.com
Subject: [WISPA Members] Health Insurance



 

I am curious about all the small operators out there.  What are you doing for 
Health Insurance?  Do you have individual policies?  Are you on your wife’s 
policy?  Is there a need for a WISPA Group Health Insurance Plan?  

 

I will be investigating this topic over the next few weeks.  I will most likely 
send out a survey in a week or two once I get together with an underwriter and 
see what the feasibility is.  Between now and then, I would like to encourage 
discussion to see whether it is worth our effort.

 

My goal is to offer a group plan that will assist those who do not have enough 
employees to justify an in-house group plan for their employees or themselves.  
Hopefully, we can reduce your cost and improve your coverage.

 

Respectfully,

 

Rick Harnish

President

WISPA

260-307-4000 cell

866-317-2851 WISPA Office

Skype: rick.harnish.

rharn...@wispa.org

 



 
 

WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Suggestions Request.

2010-07-28 Thread Josh Luthman
If you can't do Ruckus then any Ubiquiti product should work (just be
aware of antennas and PPS).  Picos would probably be the best option.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373



On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Robert West
robert.w...@just-micro.com wrote:
 Pico all the way.  Ubiquiti can do this with minimum budget.

 Bob-


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz
 Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 8:18 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: [WISPA] Suggestions Request.

 Hello,

 I could use some suggestions / field experience...

 We need to setup wifi for a medium sized apartment complex. We need to
 deliver Wifi for about 8-12 apt. spread throughout the complex. (The apt
 complex is about the size of a city block).

 We have done a field test / proof of concept with Meraki radios (only
 because I had them on the shelf), cannot do Ruckus (budget will not afford
 this).

 .. Mesh will do the job, but looking for radios with a bit more oomph than
 the Merai mini's.

 I was looking at using Ubiqiti Picostation 2HP flashed with Open-mesh ...
 but am concerned about folks on UBNT forum reporting strange coverage gap in
 the 20-50ft range

 I understand that there are some Engenius radios that will work with open
 mesh as well... ( radios need to be outdoor type).

 Any suggestions ? or opinions on PicoStation 2HP or Engenious Radios (please
 let me know what model #) and or the Open Mesh setup.

 Many Thanks in Advance.

 --
 Faisal Imtiaz
 Snappy Internet  Telecom




 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge

2010-07-28 Thread KosiNet Wireless
Thanks, I'll look at that option.

Problem is - The Link must be up and running by early next week. No time to 
experiment...

-Gary-

- Original Message - 
From: Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 8:08 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge


 6.5 miles long shot... I would do with either a Rocket M5 + Rocket Dish
 or a PowerBridge M5 (available in us next week or so).
 The smaller shots you could use NanoBridges M5 or even the NanoStation
 M5 or even the NanoStationLoco M...
 Ligowave units appear to be very nice, but hard to tell if the cost
 difference between Rocket M5 + Dish vs them is justifiable.

 If you did not want to purchase a whole variety of stuff , you could
 easily do this via a bunch of Bullet M5's with 22db Panels as well.

 Overall Bullets will have less thruput but still will get you your 20meg
 + easily.

 BTW, on the UBNT.COM now has a calculator / estimator... you can
 determine what models will work well for you.

 http://ubnt.com/linkcalculator/

 Lots of good choices, the gear works well, takes a little playing with
 and getting used to.. but then again what doesn't

 Regards.

 Faisal Imtiaz
 Snappy Internet  Telecom

 On 7/28/2010 7:46 PM, KosiNet Wireless wrote:
 Sorry for not giving all the details.

 The long shot is about 6.5 miles - Good LOS - We'll also be doing two 
 (less
 than) 1 miles shots to get it there - All good LOS. Probably going to end 
 up
 using 6 Radios to get the job done.


 - Original Message -
 From: Josh Luthmanj...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 5:49 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge



 What kind of distance?  I assume you have LOS?

 I would go with Ubiquity probably.  150 megs aggregate for $200 is
 very convenient for building to building bridges.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373



 On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Kosinet Wirelesswirel...@kosinet.com
 wrote:

 Gentlemen,

 I need opinions...

 We have an opportunity to provide a short term / high speed link for an
 event - They need 20 Meg Internet speed. We've got the bandwidth, and
 locations scoped out, just curious as to experirnce with radios.

 Currently looking at using the LigoPTP 5-23 units. Any experience? Good
 or
 bad?

 Also considering the new Ubiquity units as price is always a 
 problem.

 Thanks in advance,

 -Gary-



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge

2010-07-28 Thread Ryan Goldberg
Redline an80



On Jul 28, 2010, at 9:57 PM, KosiNet Wireless wirel...@kosinet.com wrote:

 Thanks, I'll look at that option.
 
 Problem is - The Link must be up and running by early next week. No time to 
 experiment...
 
 -Gary-
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 8:08 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge
 
 
 6.5 miles long shot... I would do with either a Rocket M5 + Rocket Dish
 or a PowerBridge M5 (available in us next week or so).
 The smaller shots you could use NanoBridges M5 or even the NanoStation
 M5 or even the NanoStationLoco M...
 Ligowave units appear to be very nice, but hard to tell if the cost
 difference between Rocket M5 + Dish vs them is justifiable.
 
 If you did not want to purchase a whole variety of stuff , you could
 easily do this via a bunch of Bullet M5's with 22db Panels as well.
 
 Overall Bullets will have less thruput but still will get you your 20meg
 + easily.
 
 BTW, on the UBNT.COM now has a calculator / estimator... you can
 determine what models will work well for you.
 
 http://ubnt.com/linkcalculator/
 
 Lots of good choices, the gear works well, takes a little playing with
 and getting used to.. but then again what doesn't
 
 Regards.
 
 Faisal Imtiaz
 Snappy Internet  Telecom
 
 On 7/28/2010 7:46 PM, KosiNet Wireless wrote:
 Sorry for not giving all the details.
 
 The long shot is about 6.5 miles - Good LOS - We'll also be doing two 
 (less
 than) 1 miles shots to get it there - All good LOS. Probably going to end 
 up
 using 6 Radios to get the job done.
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Josh Luthmanj...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 5:49 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge
 
 
 
 What kind of distance?  I assume you have LOS?
 
 I would go with Ubiquity probably.  150 megs aggregate for $200 is
 very convenient for building to building bridges.
 
 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373
 
 
 
 On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Kosinet Wirelesswirel...@kosinet.com
 wrote:
 
 Gentlemen,
 
 I need opinions...
 
 We have an opportunity to provide a short term / high speed link for an
 event - They need 20 Meg Internet speed. We've got the bandwidth, and
 locations scoped out, just curious as to experirnce with radios.
 
 Currently looking at using the LigoPTP 5-23 units. Any experience? Good
 or
 bad?
 
 Also considering the new Ubiquity units as price is always a 
 problem.
 
 Thanks in advance,
 
 -Gary-
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge

2010-07-28 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
Especially if you are working with them for the first time a couple of 
hours in the office will save you a lot of time and grief in the field...
(at least that is what we have seen in general ... crossing the t's and 
doting the i's  with the radio in the office can take a few min, doing 
that in the field a lot longer...)

:)

Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet  Telecom


On 7/28/2010 10:56 PM, KosiNet Wireless wrote:
 Thanks, I'll look at that option.

 Problem is - The Link must be up and running by early next week. No time to
 experiment...

 -Gary-

 - Original Message -
 From: Faisal Imtiazfai...@snappydsl.net
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 8:08 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge



 6.5 miles long shot... I would do with either a Rocket M5 + Rocket Dish
 or a PowerBridge M5 (available in us next week or so).
 The smaller shots you could use NanoBridges M5 or even the NanoStation
 M5 or even the NanoStationLoco M...
 Ligowave units appear to be very nice, but hard to tell if the cost
 difference between Rocket M5 + Dish vs them is justifiable.

 If you did not want to purchase a whole variety of stuff , you could
 easily do this via a bunch of Bullet M5's with 22db Panels as well.

 Overall Bullets will have less thruput but still will get you your 20meg
 + easily.

 BTW, on the UBNT.COM now has a calculator / estimator... you can
 determine what models will work well for you.

 http://ubnt.com/linkcalculator/

 Lots of good choices, the gear works well, takes a little playing with
 and getting used to.. but then again what doesn't

 Regards.

 Faisal Imtiaz
 Snappy Internet   Telecom

 On 7/28/2010 7:46 PM, KosiNet Wireless wrote:
  
 Sorry for not giving all the details.

 The long shot is about 6.5 miles - Good LOS - We'll also be doing two
 (less
 than) 1 miles shots to get it there - All good LOS. Probably going to end
 up
 using 6 Radios to get the job done.


 - Original Message -
 From: Josh Luthmanj...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 5:49 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge




 What kind of distance?  I assume you have LOS?

 I would go with Ubiquity probably.  150 megs aggregate for $200 is
 very convenient for building to building bridges.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373



 On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Kosinet Wirelesswirel...@kosinet.com
 wrote:

  
 Gentlemen,

 I need opinions...

 We have an opportunity to provide a short term / high speed link for an
 event - They need 20 Meg Internet speed. We've got the bandwidth, and
 locations scoped out, just curious as to experirnce with radios.

 Currently looking at using the LigoPTP 5-23 units. Any experience? Good
 or
 bad?

 Also considering the new Ubiquity units as price is always a
 problem

 Thanks in advance,

 -Gary-



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


  

 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

  


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

   

Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge

2010-07-28 Thread KosiNet Wireless
Those look good, but outside of the budget for this deal..

-Gary-

- Original Message - 
From: Ryan Goldberg rgoldb...@compudyne.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Cc: fai...@snappydsl.net; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 10:58 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge


 Redline an80



 On Jul 28, 2010, at 9:57 PM, KosiNet Wireless wirel...@kosinet.com 
 wrote:

 Thanks, I'll look at that option.

 Problem is - The Link must be up and running by early next week. No time 
 to
 experiment...

 -Gary-

 - Original Message - 
 From: Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 8:08 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge


 6.5 miles long shot... I would do with either a Rocket M5 + Rocket Dish
 or a PowerBridge M5 (available in us next week or so).
 The smaller shots you could use NanoBridges M5 or even the NanoStation
 M5 or even the NanoStationLoco M...
 Ligowave units appear to be very nice, but hard to tell if the cost
 difference between Rocket M5 + Dish vs them is justifiable.

 If you did not want to purchase a whole variety of stuff , you could
 easily do this via a bunch of Bullet M5's with 22db Panels as well.

 Overall Bullets will have less thruput but still will get you your 20meg
 + easily.

 BTW, on the UBNT.COM now has a calculator / estimator... you can
 determine what models will work well for you.

 http://ubnt.com/linkcalculator/

 Lots of good choices, the gear works well, takes a little playing with
 and getting used to.. but then again what doesn't

 Regards.

 Faisal Imtiaz
 Snappy Internet  Telecom

 On 7/28/2010 7:46 PM, KosiNet Wireless wrote:
 Sorry for not giving all the details.

 The long shot is about 6.5 miles - Good LOS - We'll also be doing two
 (less
 than) 1 miles shots to get it there - All good LOS. Probably going to 
 end
 up
 using 6 Radios to get the job done.


 - Original Message -
 From: Josh Luthmanj...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 5:49 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge



 What kind of distance?  I assume you have LOS?

 I would go with Ubiquity probably.  150 megs aggregate for $200 is
 very convenient for building to building bridges.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373



 On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Kosinet 
 Wirelesswirel...@kosinet.com
 wrote:

 Gentlemen,

 I need opinions...

 We have an opportunity to provide a short term / high speed link for 
 an
 event - They need 20 Meg Internet speed. We've got the bandwidth, and
 locations scoped out, just curious as to experirnce with radios.

 Currently looking at using the LigoPTP 5-23 units. Any experience? 
 Good
 or
 bad?

 Also considering the new Ubiquity units as price is always a
 problem.

 Thanks in advance,

 -Gary-



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 

Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge

2010-07-28 Thread KosiNet Wireless
Yep, been there done that

Is anyone stocking the Ubiquiti Power Bridge Units? The M5 looks good.

-Gary-

- Original Message - 
From: Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 11:12 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge


 Especially if you are working with them for the first time a couple of
 hours in the office will save you a lot of time and grief in the field...
 (at least that is what we have seen in general ... crossing the t's and
 doting the i's  with the radio in the office can take a few min, doing
 that in the field a lot longer...)

 :)

 Faisal Imtiaz
 Snappy Internet  Telecom


 On 7/28/2010 10:56 PM, KosiNet Wireless wrote:
 Thanks, I'll look at that option.

 Problem is - The Link must be up and running by early next week. No time 
 to
 experiment...

 -Gary-

 - Original Message -
 From: Faisal Imtiazfai...@snappydsl.net
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 8:08 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge



 6.5 miles long shot... I would do with either a Rocket M5 + Rocket Dish
 or a PowerBridge M5 (available in us next week or so).
 The smaller shots you could use NanoBridges M5 or even the NanoStation
 M5 or even the NanoStationLoco M...
 Ligowave units appear to be very nice, but hard to tell if the cost
 difference between Rocket M5 + Dish vs them is justifiable.

 If you did not want to purchase a whole variety of stuff , you could
 easily do this via a bunch of Bullet M5's with 22db Panels as well.

 Overall Bullets will have less thruput but still will get you your 20meg
 + easily.

 BTW, on the UBNT.COM now has a calculator / estimator... you can
 determine what models will work well for you.

 http://ubnt.com/linkcalculator/

 Lots of good choices, the gear works well, takes a little playing with
 and getting used to.. but then again what doesn't

 Regards.

 Faisal Imtiaz
 Snappy Internet   Telecom

 On 7/28/2010 7:46 PM, KosiNet Wireless wrote:

 Sorry for not giving all the details.

 The long shot is about 6.5 miles - Good LOS - We'll also be doing two
 (less
 than) 1 miles shots to get it there - All good LOS. Probably going to 
 end
 up
 using 6 Radios to get the job done.


 - Original Message -
 From: Josh Luthmanj...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 5:49 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge




 What kind of distance?  I assume you have LOS?

 I would go with Ubiquity probably.  150 megs aggregate for $200 is
 very convenient for building to building bridges.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373



 On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Kosinet 
 Wirelesswirel...@kosinet.com
 wrote:


 Gentlemen,

 I need opinions...

 We have an opportunity to provide a short term / high speed link for 
 an
 event - They need 20 Meg Internet speed. We've got the bandwidth, and
 locations scoped out, just curious as to experirnce with radios.

 Currently looking at using the LigoPTP 5-23 units. Any experience? 
 Good
 or
 bad?

 Also considering the new Ubiquity units as price is always a
 problem

 Thanks in advance,

 -Gary-



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

Re: [WISPA] USF Reform Bill Introduced - The most compelling reason to document and map your network coverage ever

2010-07-28 Thread RickG
I'd like to but I dont know where to begin and with my limited time I
cant even try to figure it out.

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Brian Webster
bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com wrote:
 Steve Coran just posted the message below to the WISPA FCC committee list. I
 took particular note to the following statement:



 - would reduce or deny support to wireline incumbents in areas where at
 least 75% of households can receive voice and broadband from a competitive
 provider that does not receive support



 Now the way I read the above statement is that if a WISP covers 75% of a
 current USF recipients service area, there will no longer be eligibility to
 receive USF funds. Remember if they have broadband they also have access to
 many VOIP providers even if you do not provide VOIP services. Vonage and
 Skype come to mind, not to mention cellular coverage. This would be a huge
 factor in leveling the playing field for WISP’s in rural markets! I cannot
 see a more compelling reason to document and map your networks than this.
 Not only will it prevent yet another subsidized competitor from coming in to
 your service area, but it will also erode funding  for any Telco who
 currently receives USF in your markets. This would bring wireless as a
 delivery method to the forefront because there are then no artificial
 revenue streams subsidizing the cost to deliver last mile service. We all
 know that wireless has the least cost per household passed in low density
 markets.



 There are many ways to document and map your coverage areas. First and
 foremost though is that you should file the Form 477 as required. Next one
 should map their network with an accurate service area where you would
 confidently offer service. This can be done many ways (including paying me
 to do it). This also shows a very important reason to be participating in
 your state broadband mapping efforts. I would expect that those state maps
 will become one of the major verification sources to establish the 75%
 coverage. The FCC 477 database will probably become another verification
 source. If you are listed in both of them it would be very hard for someone
 to say you don’t exist and don’t offer coverage in their areas.



 One of the downsides to this bill is that all broadband providers will be
 required to contribute to the fund. My gut feeling though is that if WISP’s
 were accurately mapped and documented it would show so much less of the US
 is unserved by broadband and thus the required funding through USF to get it
 there will be much less.

 Brian

 --



 Last week, Reps. Boucher (D-VA) and Terry (R-NE) introduced legislation that
 would reform the Universal Service Fund.  The Press Release, Overview,
 Section by Section summary and text of the bill are available at this link:

 http://www.boucher.house.gov/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=1579Itemid=122



 I have not read these documents, but plan to do so soon.  A few highlights
 that the trade press has noted:

     - would reduce or deny support to wireline incumbents in areas where at
 least 75% of households can receive voice and broadband from a competitive
 provider that does not receive support

     - FCC would create cost model that includes broadband in figuring
 support models

     - competitive bidding among wireless carriers for USF support

     - no more than two wireless CETCs could get support in the same area

     - carriers would have 5 years to provide broadband throughout their
 service areas, or would lose support

     - all broadband providers would pay into USF to expand contribution base

 - FCC to decide appropriate speed for broadband



 Rep. Boucher has said that the bill is on his front burner and that he
 wants to get the legislation passed this Fall.  Please feel free to comment
 on-list AFTER you've reviewed the documents so that you can promote
 education of the WISPA membership and help shape whatever position WISPA may
 wish to take as the bill works its way through Congress.  Thanks.



 Stephen E. Coran

 Rini Coran, PC

 1140 19th Street, NW, Suite 600

 Washington, D.C. 20036

 202.463.4310 - voice

 202.669.3288 - cell

 202.296.2014 - fax

 sco...@rinicoran.com - e-mail

 www.rinicoran.com

 www.telecommunicationslaw.com




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org


Re: [WISPA] Health Insurance

2010-07-28 Thread RickG
Ever check into an HSA? It was the best thing we did when I was GM at
a small CableCo.

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Mark Nash - Lists markl...@uwol.net wrote:
 We provide health insurance for employees.  To keep absolute costs down, we
 go with a high deductible for our employees, though to offset the costs in
 the cast of anything major, we pay the first $1000 of the deductible on
 behalf of the employee.

 We have 5 employees.  Owners have to pay for their own or get insurance
 elsewhere.

 - Original Message -

 From: Rick Harnish
 To: 'WISPA General List' ; memb...@wispa.org ; motor...@afmug.com
 Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 2:40 PM
 Subject: [WISPA] Health Insurance

 I am curious about all the small operators out there.  What are you doing
 for Health Insurance?  Do you have individual policies?  Are you on your
 wife’s policy?  Is there a need for a WISPA Group Health Insurance Plan?



 I will be investigating this topic over the next few weeks.  I will most
 likely send out a survey in a week or two once I get together with an
 underwriter and see what the feasibility is.  Between now and then, I would
 like to encourage discussion to see whether it is worth our effort.



 My goal is to offer a group plan that will assist those who do not have
 enough employees to justify an in-house group plan for their employees or
 themselves.  Hopefully, we can reduce your cost and improve your coverage.



 Respectfully,



 Rick Harnish

 President

 WISPA

 260-307-4000 cell

 866-317-2851 WISPA Office

 Skype: rick.harnish.

 rharn...@wispa.org



 

 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge

2010-07-28 Thread Ryan Goldberg
I hear ya.  Our unlicensed backhauls start as mikrotik, then move to redline, 
then to moto, based on revenue they support.  Not much of a performance boost 
moving to the redlines, but they quite simply Work.



On Jul 28, 2010, at 10:17 PM, KosiNet Wireless wirel...@kosinet.com wrote:

 Those look good, but outside of the budget for this deal..
 
 -Gary-
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Ryan Goldberg rgoldb...@compudyne.net
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Cc: fai...@snappydsl.net; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 10:58 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge
 
 
 Redline an80
 
 
 
 On Jul 28, 2010, at 9:57 PM, KosiNet Wireless wirel...@kosinet.com 
 wrote:
 
 Thanks, I'll look at that option.
 
 Problem is - The Link must be up and running by early next week. No time 
 to
 experiment...
 
 -Gary-
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 8:08 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge
 
 
 6.5 miles long shot... I would do with either a Rocket M5 + Rocket Dish
 or a PowerBridge M5 (available in us next week or so).
 The smaller shots you could use NanoBridges M5 or even the NanoStation
 M5 or even the NanoStationLoco M...
 Ligowave units appear to be very nice, but hard to tell if the cost
 difference between Rocket M5 + Dish vs them is justifiable.
 
 If you did not want to purchase a whole variety of stuff , you could
 easily do this via a bunch of Bullet M5's with 22db Panels as well.
 
 Overall Bullets will have less thruput but still will get you your 20meg
 + easily.
 
 BTW, on the UBNT.COM now has a calculator / estimator... you can
 determine what models will work well for you.
 
 http://ubnt.com/linkcalculator/
 
 Lots of good choices, the gear works well, takes a little playing with
 and getting used to.. but then again what doesn't
 
 Regards.
 
 Faisal Imtiaz
 Snappy Internet  Telecom
 
 On 7/28/2010 7:46 PM, KosiNet Wireless wrote:
 Sorry for not giving all the details.
 
 The long shot is about 6.5 miles - Good LOS - We'll also be doing two
 (less
 than) 1 miles shots to get it there - All good LOS. Probably going to 
 end
 up
 using 6 Radios to get the job done.
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Josh Luthmanj...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 5:49 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge
 
 
 
 What kind of distance?  I assume you have LOS?
 
 I would go with Ubiquity probably.  150 megs aggregate for $200 is
 very convenient for building to building bridges.
 
 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373
 
 
 
 On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Kosinet 
 Wirelesswirel...@kosinet.com
 wrote:
 
 Gentlemen,
 
 I need opinions...
 
 We have an opportunity to provide a short term / high speed link for 
 an
 event - They need 20 Meg Internet speed. We've got the bandwidth, and
 locations scoped out, just curious as to experirnce with radios.
 
 Currently looking at using the LigoPTP 5-23 units. Any experience? 
 Good
 or
 bad?
 
 Also considering the new Ubiquity units as price is always a
 problem.
 
 Thanks in advance,
 
 -Gary-
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 

Re: [WISPA] Suggestions Request.

2010-07-28 Thread RickG
I do like my Picos. Wish they had an PicoM!

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Josh Luthman
j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
 If you can't do Ruckus then any Ubiquiti product should work (just be
 aware of antennas and PPS).  Picos would probably be the best option.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373



 On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Robert West
 robert.w...@just-micro.com wrote:
 Pico all the way.  Ubiquiti can do this with minimum budget.

 Bob-


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz
 Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 8:18 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: [WISPA] Suggestions Request.

 Hello,

 I could use some suggestions / field experience...

 We need to setup wifi for a medium sized apartment complex. We need to
 deliver Wifi for about 8-12 apt. spread throughout the complex. (The apt
 complex is about the size of a city block).

 We have done a field test / proof of concept with Meraki radios (only
 because I had them on the shelf), cannot do Ruckus (budget will not afford
 this).

 .. Mesh will do the job, but looking for radios with a bit more oomph than
 the Merai mini's.

 I was looking at using Ubiqiti Picostation 2HP flashed with Open-mesh ...
 but am concerned about folks on UBNT forum reporting strange coverage gap in
 the 20-50ft range

 I understand that there are some Engenius radios that will work with open
 mesh as well... ( radios need to be outdoor type).

 Any suggestions ? or opinions on PicoStation 2HP or Engenious Radios (please
 let me know what model #) and or the Open Mesh setup.

 Many Thanks in Advance.

 --
 Faisal Imtiaz
 Snappy Internet  Telecom




 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Health Insurance

2010-07-28 Thread Forbes Mercy
In Washington State the Association of Washington Businesses (Average 
White Band as I like to call them) have a statewide buy-in policy that's 
half of what I paid when I had my own Blue Cross plan, it went up 2 
percent last year while my old one averaged 10-15 percent annual raise 
and deductibles and other coverages (dental/vision) dirt cheap.  My 
employees are young and cheap to cover, I love the plan!

Forbes

On 7/28/2010 8:26 PM, RickG wrote:
 Ever check into an HSA? It was the best thing we did when I was GM at
 a small CableCo.

 On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Mark Nash - Listsmarkl...@uwol.net  wrote:

 We provide health insurance for employees.  To keep absolute costs down, we
 go with a high deductible for our employees, though to offset the costs in
 the cast of anything major, we pay the first $1000 of the deductible on
 behalf of the employee.

 We have 5 employees.  Owners have to pay for their own or get insurance
 elsewhere.

 - Original Message -

 From: Rick Harnish
 To: 'WISPA General List' ; memb...@wispa.org ; motor...@afmug.com
 Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 2:40 PM
 Subject: [WISPA] Health Insurance

 I am curious about all the small operators out there.  What are you doing
 for Health Insurance?  Do you have individual policies?  Are you on your
 wife’s policy?  Is there a need for a WISPA Group Health Insurance Plan?



 I will be investigating this topic over the next few weeks.  I will most
 likely send out a survey in a week or two once I get together with an
 underwriter and see what the feasibility is.  Between now and then, I would
 like to encourage discussion to see whether it is worth our effort.



 My goal is to offer a group plan that will assist those who do not have
 enough employees to justify an in-house group plan for their employees or
 themselves.  Hopefully, we can reduce your cost and improve your coverage.



 Respectfully,



 Rick Harnish

 President

 WISPA

 260-307-4000 cell

 866-317-2851 WISPA Office

 Skype: rick.harnish.

 rharn...@wispa.org



 

 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

  

 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Suggestions Request.

2010-07-28 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
according to Streakwave Website there is such a thing as PicoM 2HP...
if it is available and shipping ... don't know...

Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet  Telecom

On 7/28/2010 11:31 PM, RickG wrote:
 I do like my Picos. Wish they had an PicoM!





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] How is your grounding plan?

2010-07-28 Thread Robert West
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bvmEYxEYiA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bvmEYxEYiAfeature=topvideos
feature=topvideos

 

Crazy.




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] USF Reform Bill Introduced - The most compelling reason todocument and map your network coverage ever

2010-07-28 Thread MDK
Great, they want to tax us now.   

Nothing like getting kicked in the head.Tax the little guy to subsidize the 
big one.What a wonderful plan.  

This is worse than NOTHING.  



+
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
541-969-8200  509-386-4589
++


From: Brian Webster 
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 9:37 AM
To: memb...@wispa.org ; 'WISPA General List' ; motor...@afmug.com 
Subject: [WISPA] USF Reform Bill Introduced - The most compelling reason 
todocument and map your network coverage ever


Steve Coran just posted the message below to the WISPA FCC committee list. I 
took particular note to the following statement:

 

- would reduce or deny support to wireline incumbents in areas where at least 
75% of households can receive voice and broadband from a competitive provider 
that does not receive support

 

Now the way I read the above statement is that if a WISP covers 75% of a 
current USF recipients service area, there will no longer be eligibility to 
receive USF funds. Remember if they have broadband they also have access to 
many VOIP providers even if you do not provide VOIP services. Vonage and Skype 
come to mind, not to mention cellular coverage. This would be a huge factor in 
leveling the playing field for WISP's in rural markets! I cannot see a more 
compelling reason to document and map your networks than this. Not only will it 
prevent yet another subsidized competitor from coming in to your service area, 
but it will also erode funding  for any Telco who currently receives USF in 
your markets. This would bring wireless as a delivery method to the forefront 
because there are then no artificial revenue streams subsidizing the cost to 
deliver last mile service. We all know that wireless has the least cost per 
household passed in low density markets.

 

There are many ways to document and map your coverage areas. First and foremost 
though is that you should file the Form 477 as required. Next one should map 
their network with an accurate service area where you would confidently offer 
service. This can be done many ways (including paying me to do it). This also 
shows a very important reason to be participating in your state broadband 
mapping efforts. I would expect that those state maps will become one of the 
major verification sources to establish the 75% coverage. The FCC 477 database 
will probably become another verification source. If you are listed in both of 
them it would be very hard for someone to say you don't exist and don't offer 
coverage in their areas.

 

One of the downsides to this bill is that all broadband providers will be 
required to contribute to the fund. My gut feeling though is that if WISP's 
were accurately mapped and documented it would show so much less of the US is 
unserved by broadband and thus the required funding through USF to get it there 
will be much less.



Brian

--

 

Last week, Reps. Boucher (D-VA) and Terry (R-NE) introduced legislation that 
would reform the Universal Service Fund.  The Press Release, Overview, Section 
by Section summary and text of the bill are available at this link:

http://www.boucher.house.gov/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=1579Itemid=122

 

I have not read these documents, but plan to do so soon.  A few highlights that 
the trade press has noted:

- would reduce or deny support to wireline incumbents in areas where at 
least 75% of households can receive voice and broadband from a competitive 
provider that does not receive support

- FCC would create cost model that includes broadband in figuring support 
models

- competitive bidding among wireless carriers for USF support

- no more than two wireless CETCs could get support in the same area

- carriers would have 5 years to provide broadband throughout their service 
areas, or would lose support

- all broadband providers would pay into USF to expand contribution base

- FCC to decide appropriate speed for broadband 

 

Rep. Boucher has said that the bill is on his front burner and that he wants 
to get the legislation passed this Fall.  Please feel free to comment on-list 
AFTER you've reviewed the documents so that you can promote education of the 
WISPA membership and help shape whatever position WISPA may wish to take as the 
bill works its way through Congress.  Thanks.  

 

Stephen E. Coran

Rini Coran, PC

1140 19th Street, NW, Suite 600 

Washington, D.C. 20036

202.463.4310 - voice

202.669.3288 - cell

202.296.2014 - fax

sco...@rinicoran.com - e-mail

www.rinicoran.com

www.telecommunicationslaw.com

 









WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA 

Re: [WISPA] USF Reform Bill Introduced - The most compelling reasonto document and map your network coverage ever

2010-07-28 Thread MDK
How can this be good?IT IS A PER-CUSTOMER TAX ON OUR SERVICE AND GAURANTEED 
TO NEVER HELP SMALL PROVIDERS.   

Cripes, this is good?

There's ONE good plan.   

USF go byebye.  



++
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
541-969-8200  509-386-4589
++


From: St. Louis Broadband 
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 9:59 AM
To: bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com ; 'WISPA General List' ; memb...@wispa.org ; 
motor...@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [WISPA] USF Reform Bill Introduced - The most compelling reasonto 
document and map your network coverage ever


- would reduce or deny support to wireline incumbents in areas where at least 
75% of households can receive voice and broadband from a competitive provider 
that does not receive support

 

Ø  Now the way I read the above statement is that if a WISP covers 75% of a 
current USF recipients service area, there will no longer be eligibility to 
receive USF funds. Remember if they have broadband they also have access to 
many VOIP providers even if you do not provide VOIP services. Vonage and Skype 
come to mind, not to mention cellular coverage. This would be a huge factor in 
leveling the playing field for WISP's in rural markets!

 

That is the way I see it too!

 

 

Victoria Proffer

www.ShowMeBroadband.com

www.StLouisBroadband.com

314-974-5600

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Brian Webster
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 11:37 AM
To: memb...@wispa.org; 'WISPA General List'; motor...@afmug.com
Subject: [WISPA] USF Reform Bill Introduced - The most compelling reason to 
document and map your network coverage ever
Importance: High

 

Steve Coran just posted the message below to the WISPA FCC committee list. I 
took particular note to the following statement:

 

- would reduce or deny support to wireline incumbents in areas where at least 
75% of households can receive voice and broadband from a competitive provider 
that does not receive support

 

Now the way I read the above statement is that if a WISP covers 75% of a 
current USF recipients service area, there will no longer be eligibility to 
receive USF funds. Remember if they have broadband they also have access to 
many VOIP providers even if you do not provide VOIP services. Vonage and Skype 
come to mind, not to mention cellular coverage. This would be a huge factor in 
leveling the playing field for WISP's in rural markets! I cannot see a more 
compelling reason to document and map your networks than this. Not only will it 
prevent yet another subsidized competitor from coming in to your service area, 
but it will also erode funding  for any Telco who currently receives USF in 
your markets. This would bring wireless as a delivery method to the forefront 
because there are then no artificial revenue streams subsidizing the cost to 
deliver last mile service. We all know that wireless has the least cost per 
household passed in low density markets.

 

There are many ways to document and map your coverage areas. First and foremost 
though is that you should file the Form 477 as required. Next one should map 
their network with an accurate service area where you would confidently offer 
service. This can be done many ways (including paying me to do it). This also 
shows a very important reason to be participating in your state broadband 
mapping efforts. I would expect that those state maps will become one of the 
major verification sources to establish the 75% coverage. The FCC 477 database 
will probably become another verification source. If you are listed in both of 
them it would be very hard for someone to say you don't exist and don't offer 
coverage in their areas.

 

One of the downsides to this bill is that all broadband providers will be 
required to contribute to the fund. My gut feeling though is that if WISP's 
were accurately mapped and documented it would show so much less of the US is 
unserved by broadband and thus the required funding through USF to get it there 
will be much less.



Brian

--

 

Last week, Reps. Boucher (D-VA) and Terry (R-NE) introduced legislation that 
would reform the Universal Service Fund.  The Press Release, Overview, Section 
by Section summary and text of the bill are available at this link:

http://www.boucher.house.gov/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=1579Itemid=122

 

I have not read these documents, but plan to do so soon.  A few highlights that 
the trade press has noted:

- would reduce or deny support to wireline incumbents in areas where at 
least 75% of households can receive voice and broadband from a competitive 
provider that does not receive support

- FCC would create cost model that includes broadband in figuring support 
models

- competitive bidding among wireless carriers for USF support

- no more than two wireless CETCs could get support in the same area

- carriers 

Re: [WISPA] How is your grounding plan?

2010-07-28 Thread Josh Luthman
High speed cameras are definitely one of the best inventions of this
century. Really cool looking but I wouldn't want to be anywhere near there,
ever!

On Jul 29, 2010 12:36 AM, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bvmEYxEYiAfeature=topvideos



Crazy.




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Suggestions Request.

2010-07-28 Thread RickG
Speaking of Ubiquiti - any news about 900MHz?

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:51 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net wrote:
 according to Streakwave Website there is such a thing as PicoM 2HP...
 if it is available and shipping ... don't know...

 Faisal Imtiaz
 Snappy Internet  Telecom

 On 7/28/2010 11:31 PM, RickG wrote:
 I do like my Picos. Wish they had an PicoM!




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] USF Reform Bill Introduced - The most compelling reason todocument and map your network coverage ever

2010-07-28 Thread RickG
It's coming, no stopping it. If anyone thought double taxation was
bad, how about a triple play? I sure hope somebody comes to their
senses in DC soon. Whats a small guy to do?

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:42 AM, MDK rea...@muddyfrogwater.us wrote:
 Great, they want to tax us now.

 Nothing like getting kicked in the head.    Tax the little guy to subsidize
 the big one.    What a wonderful plan.

 This is worse than NOTHING.



 +
 Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
 541-969-8200  509-386-4589
 ++
 From: Brian Webster
 Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 9:37 AM
 To: memb...@wispa.org ; 'WISPA General List' ; motor...@afmug.com
 Subject: [WISPA] USF Reform Bill Introduced - The most compelling reason
 todocument and map your network coverage ever

 Steve Coran just posted the message below to the WISPA FCC committee list. I
 took particular note to the following statement:



 - would reduce or deny support to wireline incumbents in areas where at
 least 75% of households can receive voice and broadband from a competitive
 provider that does not receive support



 Now the way I read the above statement is that if a WISP covers 75% of a
 current USF recipients service area, there will no longer be eligibility to
 receive USF funds. Remember if they have broadband they also have access to
 many VOIP providers even if you do not provide VOIP services. Vonage and
 Skype come to mind, not to mention cellular coverage. This would be a huge
 factor in leveling the playing field for WISP’s in rural markets! I cannot
 see a more compelling reason to document and map your networks than this.
 Not only will it prevent yet another subsidized competitor from coming in to
 your service area, but it will also erode funding  for any Telco who
 currently receives USF in your markets. This would bring wireless as a
 delivery method to the forefront because there are then no artificial
 revenue streams subsidizing the cost to deliver last mile service. We all
 know that wireless has the least cost per household passed in low density
 markets.



 There are many ways to document and map your coverage areas. First and
 foremost though is that you should file the Form 477 as required. Next one
 should map their network with an accurate service area where you would
 confidently offer service. This can be done many ways (including paying me
 to do it). This also shows a very important reason to be participating in
 your state broadband mapping efforts. I would expect that those state maps
 will become one of the major verification sources to establish the 75%
 coverage. The FCC 477 database will probably become another verification
 source. If you are listed in both of them it would be very hard for someone
 to say you don’t exist and don’t offer coverage in their areas.



 One of the downsides to this bill is that all broadband providers will be
 required to contribute to the fund. My gut feeling though is that if WISP’s
 were accurately mapped and documented it would show so much less of the US
 is unserved by broadband and thus the required funding through USF to get it
 there will be much less.

 Brian

 --



 Last week, Reps. Boucher (D-VA) and Terry (R-NE) introduced legislation that
 would reform the Universal Service Fund.  The Press Release, Overview,
 Section by Section summary and text of the bill are available at this link:

 http://www.boucher.house.gov/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=1579Itemid=122



 I have not read these documents, but plan to do so soon.  A few highlights
 that the trade press has noted:

     - would reduce or deny support to wireline incumbents in areas where at
 least 75% of households can receive voice and broadband from a competitive
 provider that does not receive support

     - FCC would create cost model that includes broadband in figuring
 support models

     - competitive bidding among wireless carriers for USF support

     - no more than two wireless CETCs could get support in the same area

     - carriers would have 5 years to provide broadband throughout their
 service areas, or would lose support

     - all broadband providers would pay into USF to expand contribution base

 - FCC to decide appropriate speed for broadband



 Rep. Boucher has said that the bill is on his front burner and that he
 wants to get the legislation passed this Fall.  Please feel free to comment
 on-list AFTER you've reviewed the documents so that you can promote
 education of the WISPA membership and help shape whatever position WISPA may
 wish to take as the bill works its way through Congress.  Thanks.



 Stephen E. Coran

 Rini Coran, PC

 1140 19th Street, NW, Suite 600

 Washington, D.C. 20036

 202.463.4310 - voice

 202.669.3288 - cell

 202.296.2014 - fax

 sco...@rinicoran.com - e-mail

 www.rinicoran.com

 www.telecommunicationslaw.com



 

 

Re: [WISPA] How is your grounding plan?

2010-07-28 Thread RickG
Looked like here last week!

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Robert West
robert.w...@just-micro.com wrote:
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bvmEYxEYiAfeature=topvideos



 Crazy.


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge

2010-07-28 Thread Jerry Richardson
For this I would use two Rocket M5's with the 30dB Rocket dishes. Reason being 
is after the event is done, you will have a set of radios you can use in 
another part of the network for up to a 30 mile shot.

Configure: 
One as AP WDS 
One as Station WDS.
10MHz channel
Max Tx Rate Automatic
AirMax Enabled
No ACK mode for PTP enabled

Watch it fly

- Jerry

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of KosiNet Wireless
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 7:57 PM
To: fai...@snappydsl.net; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge

Thanks, I'll look at that option.

Problem is - The Link must be up and running by early next week. No time to 
experiment...

-Gary-

- Original Message - 
From: Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 8:08 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge


 6.5 miles long shot... I would do with either a Rocket M5 + Rocket Dish
 or a PowerBridge M5 (available in us next week or so).
 The smaller shots you could use NanoBridges M5 or even the NanoStation
 M5 or even the NanoStationLoco M...
 Ligowave units appear to be very nice, but hard to tell if the cost
 difference between Rocket M5 + Dish vs them is justifiable.

 If you did not want to purchase a whole variety of stuff , you could
 easily do this via a bunch of Bullet M5's with 22db Panels as well.

 Overall Bullets will have less thruput but still will get you your 20meg
 + easily.

 BTW, on the UBNT.COM now has a calculator / estimator... you can
 determine what models will work well for you.

 http://ubnt.com/linkcalculator/

 Lots of good choices, the gear works well, takes a little playing with
 and getting used to.. but then again what doesn't

 Regards.

 Faisal Imtiaz
 Snappy Internet  Telecom

 On 7/28/2010 7:46 PM, KosiNet Wireless wrote:
 Sorry for not giving all the details.

 The long shot is about 6.5 miles - Good LOS - We'll also be doing two 
 (less
 than) 1 miles shots to get it there - All good LOS. Probably going to end 
 up
 using 6 Radios to get the job done.


 - Original Message -
 From: Josh Luthmanj...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 5:49 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge



 What kind of distance?  I assume you have LOS?

 I would go with Ubiquity probably.  150 megs aggregate for $200 is
 very convenient for building to building bridges.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373



 On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Kosinet Wirelesswirel...@kosinet.com
 wrote:

 Gentlemen,

 I need opinions...

 We have an opportunity to provide a short term / high speed link for an
 event - They need 20 Meg Internet speed. We've got the bandwidth, and
 locations scoped out, just curious as to experirnce with radios.

 Currently looking at using the LigoPTP 5-23 units. Any experience? Good
 or
 bad?

 Also considering the new Ubiquity units as price is always a 
 problem.

 Thanks in advance,

 -Gary-



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org


Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge

2010-07-28 Thread Jerry Richardson
Oh, and adjust output power to provide -65dB at each end.

- Jerry


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Jerry Richardson
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 10:43 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge

For this I would use two Rocket M5's with the 30dB Rocket dishes. Reason being 
is after the event is done, you will have a set of radios you can use in 
another part of the network for up to a 30 mile shot.

Configure: 
One as AP WDS 
One as Station WDS.
10MHz channel
Max Tx Rate Automatic
AirMax Enabled
No ACK mode for PTP enabled

Watch it fly

- Jerry

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of KosiNet Wireless
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 7:57 PM
To: fai...@snappydsl.net; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge

Thanks, I'll look at that option.

Problem is - The Link must be up and running by early next week. No time to 
experiment...

-Gary-

- Original Message - 
From: Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 8:08 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge


 6.5 miles long shot... I would do with either a Rocket M5 + Rocket Dish
 or a PowerBridge M5 (available in us next week or so).
 The smaller shots you could use NanoBridges M5 or even the NanoStation
 M5 or even the NanoStationLoco M...
 Ligowave units appear to be very nice, but hard to tell if the cost
 difference between Rocket M5 + Dish vs them is justifiable.

 If you did not want to purchase a whole variety of stuff , you could
 easily do this via a bunch of Bullet M5's with 22db Panels as well.

 Overall Bullets will have less thruput but still will get you your 20meg
 + easily.

 BTW, on the UBNT.COM now has a calculator / estimator... you can
 determine what models will work well for you.

 http://ubnt.com/linkcalculator/

 Lots of good choices, the gear works well, takes a little playing with
 and getting used to.. but then again what doesn't

 Regards.

 Faisal Imtiaz
 Snappy Internet  Telecom

 On 7/28/2010 7:46 PM, KosiNet Wireless wrote:
 Sorry for not giving all the details.

 The long shot is about 6.5 miles - Good LOS - We'll also be doing two 
 (less
 than) 1 miles shots to get it there - All good LOS. Probably going to end 
 up
 using 6 Radios to get the job done.


 - Original Message -
 From: Josh Luthmanj...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 5:49 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] High Speed Bridge



 What kind of distance?  I assume you have LOS?

 I would go with Ubiquity probably.  150 megs aggregate for $200 is
 very convenient for building to building bridges.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373



 On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Kosinet Wirelesswirel...@kosinet.com
 wrote:

 Gentlemen,

 I need opinions...

 We have an opportunity to provide a short term / high speed link for an
 event - They need 20 Meg Internet speed. We've got the bandwidth, and
 locations scoped out, just curious as to experirnce with radios.

 Currently looking at using the LigoPTP 5-23 units. Any experience? Good
 or
 bad?

 Also considering the new Ubiquity units as price is always a 
 problem.

 Thanks in advance,

 -Gary-



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: