actually it might not be MK at all, it's the spooky track on side one of
'techno 2' - vice?
oh whatever, i need a life, obviously...
Subject: (313) oops
actually it might not be MK at all, it's the spooky track on side one of
'techno 2' - vice?
oh whatever, i need a life, obviously...
I think you mean the Tim Brown track, 'Stark' by KGB...whatever happened
to...
-Original Message-
From: Philip McGarva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 July 2007 11:59
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: (313) oops
actually it might not be MK at all, it's the spooky track on side one
-- Original Message --
From: Tristan Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
simply because my records are organised only by previous pilings
thats how all my records are organized. its kinda fun, you have to
remember the last time you played a record and remember what
I've enjoyed reading this thread because I can't tell you what song is on
what side of most of my records
people will talk about a song by name and I just give them a blank stare -
then they say it's that one that goes
and -ah!- yes. I know which one you're talking about now.
I remember
Brian Prince wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I don't even read what it says on my records anymore. I just know them by
the colors and pictures mostly.
Like, I know I have a green Drexciya record. And a blue one. And a
couple others, they are in that one crate, hopefully, right next to the
I place a colour every 10 black or white sleaves, and I remember them
by placement.. so if i'm a bit off, its only 5 records away from being
found :)
go brain go!
On 18/03/2005, at 12:48 PM, David Gillies wrote:
Brian Prince wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I don't even read what it says on
313@hyperreal.org
Subject
Re: (313) OOPS
]
Subject
Re: (313) OOPS
was again?... (actually I'm much
better with people's names. He says, ha!)
Dan
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 17:41:26 -
To: 313@hyperreal.org
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (313) OOPS
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh wait, it's James Stinson... okay I didn't know
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phew - and I thought it was just me that had no grasp of names and labels!
I'll tell you where it's at in my collection, know the sleeve design, know
how it sounds, but names?...
I try and pay attention but just don't remember them.
Non-trainspotters unite!
as much
the thing i disliked the most about djing with cds was that it
involved a different mental process to find the next track i wanted to
play. with records i flick through my box and, if i'm on point, the next
record practically leaps out,
I'm having this problem at the moment!!
I can't, for some
Practice more on your computer
On 18 Mar 2005, at 13:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the thing i disliked the most about djing with cds was that it
involved a different mental process to find the next track i wanted to
play. with records i flick through my box and, if i'm on point, the
Practice more on your computer
you know what, you're probably right.
I cant say I ever, ever do 'a mix' on it at home (maybe once every 6
months?). or even mess about that much really, I dont get much time at all,
and when I do get time, its usually spent trying to learn more things about
We have 500 gigs of tracks sat on external disks, we pull tracks like
you pull records, building sets as we go. We also play a game of
impossible, where you pick a track that you think will be impossible
to mix into/out off - we just shout instruction at each other, drop the
bass, lose the
martin, when you play records do you have a definite 'set' that you do
when you play out too? just wondered.
(ie. you effectively do the same as with files below)
robin...
Martin Dust wrote:
We have 500 gigs of tracks sat on external disks, we pull tracks like
you pull records, building sets
martin, when you play records do you have a definite 'set' that you do
when you play out too? just wondered.
It depends, sometimes we'll build a set to use, but we always carry
loads more than we need and we always take the externals so we can
change everything on the fly, this lets us
At 09:08 AM 3/18/2005, Martin Dust wrote:
We double up the controllers, so on one button press you are dealing with
volume/tops/middle/bottom, press again and you have
echo/filter/gate/distort - meaning you have 40 knobs not 20 :)
Just out of curiosity, what do you use for controllers?
--
But we have used the methods below live
but it's a lot of pressure.
I've found this lately.
I have this strange thing in my head, that if I'm going to use pc over
records, then I best be offering something records can't.
so, I do all my re-edits 'live' and 'on the fly'
however, this is
On 18 Mar 2005, at 14:18, matt kane's brain wrote:
At 09:08 AM 3/18/2005, Martin Dust wrote:
We double up the controllers, so on one button press you are dealing
with volume/tops/middle/bottom, press again and you have
echo/filter/gate/distort - meaning you have 40 knobs not 20 :)
Just
but, I think I need to do more preparation - it always seems like
cheating
a bit though! (I know its not really, just in my head)
Nah, this is simply like when a smoker stops smoking - you don't know
what to do with your hands - There's always stuff to do, use the
controller like you
Re Ableton midi controllers, I had a very good look around to see what was
on the market, and basically I didn't really like any of them. Rubbish
build, one might have enough sliders, but not enough buttons and vice
versa.
I know Martin has said to me before you have to make do with what you can
Seems like this is some kind of common way for dj's of telling where the
records are and how they sound. I have tons of records that I know by
their looks. My mental process goes something like: Hmm, there is this
track on the record which has white and yellow sleeve and the record has
red
i know the artist, title and label of most of my records but i don't
have a clue where any of them are
doing a mix is very frustrating.
as is trying to sort them out
p
Jari Tolkkinen wrote:
Seems like this is some kind of common way for dj's of telling where
the records are
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005, Placid wrote:
i know the artist, title and label of most of my records but i don't have a
clue where any of them are
doing a mix is very frustrating.
as is trying to sort them out
Ok I sort of know at the time of purchase (and later on) the title of the
That's wicked Martin...
I really want to hear one of these sets. If I was rich I'd bring ya to
Chicago...
~David
-- Original Message -
Subject: Re: (313) OOPS
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:49:41 +
From: Martin Dust [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We have 500 gigs
://www.phonopsia.co.uk
Original message
Subject:SPAM-LOW: Re: (313) OOPS
Author: Jari Tolkkinen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 18th March 2005 6:28:34
Seems like this is some kind of common way for dj's of telling where the
records are and how they sound. I
Oh wait, it's James Stinson... okay I didn't know that Clarence G pseudonym.
I don't even read what it says on my records anymore. I just know them by the
colors and pictures mostly.
Like, I know I have a green Drexciya record. And a blue one. And a couple
others, they are in that one crate,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I don't even read what it says on my records anymore. I just know them by
the colors and pictures mostly.
Like, I know I have a green Drexciya record. And a blue one. And a
couple others, they are in that one crate, hopefully, right next to the
stack of books. A
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
that is one of the coolest things ive ever heard!
i completely know where your coming from with that too!
derek.
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Brian Prince wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I don't even read what it says on my records anymore. I just know
sorry for the duplicate post.
I wrote:
'certainly better imho than the monotonous
stuff he played Sunday morning'
Make that Monday morning...doh!
And this sentence should read like this: 'Kooky and Ricardo's PAs were
great as well, EVEN if it was difficult to see just what they were up to.'
AND I can not believe I wrote
sorry ppl that wasn't meant 4 general consumption...
p
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Before someone unleashes a bitchfest... please excuse that last message... I
was told to FWD it to 313 and didn't realize j3s allread did. I just got
home from Kings Island and still feel like Im on a rollercoaster.
For those of you going to lifefest.. have a blast. I wish I could be there!
it just depends on how it's doneand when you mention getting back to the
roots
check out The Roots, they do quite well with a live band.
Five
Yes! I have seen them, they were really good, but they were a band from the
gitgo. No a couple of guys that a producer tracks down.
Ollie
Laurent Garnier had what I assumed was a keybordist and a sax player when he
played live at Motor.
That was well done!
I have photos if anyone is interested hit me back or check out neksis.com under
picturelive acts
mg
Matthew
For what it's worth, I've noticed a reversion to more
live instruments in dp house lately. It reminds me
of disco instrumentation, but updated to fit the new
mold.
I'd say things are moving in both directions at once
though, since many electronic music producers are
going to entirely soft
? Mos Def did it
on the Tonight Show a few weeks ago and it sounded smooth as hell.
Mike
From: nancy mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: [313] oops..Re:Live music etc.
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 11:27:43 -0800 (PST)
.
Hip hop originated
i saw that Snoop performance about six or seven years ago, with the live
band. it did sound bad, but that's because you're trying to reproduce
electronic sounds, with no live instrument influence. of course it's going
to sound bad.
what's wrong with RB/rappers doing live instrument music?
I saw a busta rhymes and roots performance on (i wanna say) conan o'brian?
last night when I was flipping through the channels--sounded pretty tight
to me.
From: Michael Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: [313] oops..Re:Live music etc
41 matches
Mail list logo
