Re: [AFMUG] Need new billing solution asap!!!

I think it is still pretty early on. On 12/4/2015 6:22 PM, Chuck Hogg wrote: So I guess it does that...lol. I wasn't really expecting it to be like that. It's not very baked ? or am I missing something? Regards, Chuck On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Chuck Hogg >

Re: [AFMUG] to slant, or not to slant - that is the question

What is the affect of fresnel encroachment in this scenario? This is not believable of zero throughout or signal lossbut ok. Jon Langeler Michwave Technologies, Inc. > On Dec 4, 2015, at 4:25 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: > > Since inquiring minds want to know... > > Here is the Word on this

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.5ms frame

Like 80% sure I'm right but ya latency is the most important. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 4, 2015 7:47 PM, "Mathew Howard" wrote: > Isn't throughput supposed to be slightly worse with 2.5ms, or am I > remembering that wron

Re: [AFMUG] Need new billing solution asap!!!

hehe ... no idea.. can't help you there.. I only took a look at the link after you asked the question... Not trying to be a smart ass, but sometimes things click in place other times they don't ! In regards to the Billing Solutions, we went with Freeside, (primarily for how it handles the

Re: [AFMUG] to slant, or not to slant - that is the question

No worries, you are on the right track, and asking the right questions. The document, while it says a lot, it also leaves another very interesting question unanswered, with a very casual implied answer See if you can read between the lines and figure out the 'it' ! :) (ref: Movie Ci

Re: [AFMUG] to slant, or not to slant - that is the question

That's just mean... he can't tease us like that and not tell us more! On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 3:51 PM, George Skorup wrote: > Stop teasing us! :) You got a datasheet? How about a picture? When can I > buy it? How about now? 3..2..1.. how about now? Tomorrow? Hello, are you > there? Matt hung up o

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.5ms frame

Isn't throughput supposed to be slightly worse with 2.5ms, or am I remembering that wrong? There is definitely a big improvement in latency. Either way, I don't think the difference in throughput is enough to care about, I'd rather have the lower latency. On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Josh Luth

Re: [AFMUG] Need new billing solution asap!!!

So I guess it does that...lol. I wasn't really expecting it to be like that. It's not very baked ? or am I missing something? Regards, Chuck On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Chuck Hogg wrote: > I meant for the admin side? > > Regards, > Chuck > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Faisal Imtiaz

Re: [AFMUG] Need new billing solution asap!!!

I meant for the admin side? Regards, Chuck On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: > Just guessing > > Drop down on top right, select signup/create account ! > > :) > > Faisal Imtiaz > Snappy Internet & Telecom > 7266 SW 48 Street > Miami, FL 33155 > Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 > >

[AFMUG] roundcube part 2

After successful experiments, roundcube is now up and running in two separate instances for customer-facing and internal email client services... Most people also synchronize their email inboxes by IMAPS with a regular client like Thunderbird, Outlook, or one of the many iOS and Android clients. H

Re: [AFMUG] to slant, or not to slant - that is the question

Stop teasing us! :) You got a datasheet? How about a picture? When can I buy it? How about now? 3..2..1.. how about now? Tomorrow? Hello, are you there? Matt hung up on me. I guess I can wait until Monday. On 12/4/2015 3:29 PM, Matt Mangriotis wrote: Just want to point out that this same logi

Re: [AFMUG] to slant, or not to slant - that is the question

Thanks! Just the info I needed so that I can figure out how to eat my shorts! Now I need to read this thing really carefully because my mind just went pop. Sounds like y’all were ahead of me in this area of thinking something was out of order… Sincerely, Joshaven Potter MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE

Re: [AFMUG] to slant, or not to slant - that is the question

Yep, that's it. There you go. On 12/4/2015 3:25 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: Since inquiring minds want to know... Here is the Word on this topic from Cambium... (While this was titled 2.4Ghz, as per them, it applies to their 5ghz as well). :) Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom 7266 SW 48

Re: [AFMUG] to slant, or not to slant - that is the question

It does not have to do with the ports being arranged backwards, nor MIMO-A vs MIMO-B. We were all like WTF when Cambium started shipping the ePMP 2.4 AP antennas as -/+45 while the SMs are V/H. We all said, how the hell does that work when the 45 antenna will be seeing the V/H signals at -3dB?

Re: [AFMUG] to slant, or not to slant - that is the question

Just want to point out that this same logic and coding exists in the PMP 450 platform as well. You’ll see very soon when we release the high gain integrated PMP 450 SM at 3 GHz, it’s H+V, not dual slant, but works equally as well and gives you 19 dBi gain. Matt From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afm

Re: [AFMUG] Need new billing solution asap!!!

Just guessing Drop down on top right, select signup/create account ! :) Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom 7266 SW 48 Street Miami, FL 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net > From: "Chuck Hogg" > To: af@afmug.com

Re: [AFMUG] Need new billing solution asap!!!

Anyone know how to login to his demo? Regards, Chuck On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Simon Westlake wrote: > https://github.com/spencerlambert/wisp-central-control > > On 12/4/2015 10:08 AM, Jeremy wrote: > > Isn't Spencer Lambert's web front-end free? Last time I saw him at Animal > Farm he

Re: [AFMUG] to slant, or not to slant - that is the question

The Atheros chipset differentiating between the Mimo chains does not have to do with 45º slant vs 90º… it means that chain A and B on one radio can be H&V or V&H while chain A and B on the other can be H&V or V&H interchangeably with no loss because and the chip will just cross them over as nee

Re: [AFMUG] to slant, or not to slant - that is the question

yup. On 12/4/2015 3:29 PM, George Skorup wrote: They've already explained this. The Atheros chipset in the ePMP can discriminate the two paths based on the phase of the two signals in a mixed slant and V/H antenna configuration. On 12/4/2015 2:23 PM, Jon Langeler wrote: That would only work i

Re: [AFMUG] to slant, or not to slant - that is the question

They've already explained this. The Atheros chipset in the ePMP can discriminate the two paths based on the phase of the two signals in a mixed slant and V/H antenna configuration. On 12/4/2015 2:23 PM, Jon Langeler wrote: That would only work if the radio is capable of signal combining or MIm

Re: [AFMUG] to slant, or not to slant - that is the question

Now that all the opinions are out there…. The post from Daniel Sullivan, that he just confirmed on the list applies to 5 Ghz and 2.4 Ghz was this… exact quote…”In tests we have undertook, there is no difference between slant and H and V with regards to MIMO-A and MIMO-B performance.” Thanks fo

Re: [AFMUG] to slant, or not to slant - that is the question

That would only work if the radio is capable of signal combining or MImo-A and also halves your throughput. You definitely want to match it on both ends Jon Langeler Michwave Technologies, Inc. > On Dec 4, 2015, at 2:13 PM, Adam Moffett wrote: > > The DSP in the ePMP can do some kind of proces

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.5ms frame

A bit more throughput. Not worth changing from 5ms to 2.5ms if all you're after is throughput. Any new APs I do 2.5ms instead of 5ms since there's no reason to do it "the old way". You do get better latency - 7.5ms improvement. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne

[AFMUG] ePMP 2.5ms frame

It's a big day for ePMP threads. If I recall correctly, the 2.5ms frame size was introduced to aid in collocation with the PMP100. Is there any performance impact? My first thought was that a shorter frame would give me lower latency, but it's probably not that simple.

Re: [AFMUG] to slant, or not to slant - that is the question

Hi Paul, I am assuming this is an ABCABC GPS sync site you are talking about. Please make sure to check the front to back ratio of the antenna you choose to use. We, Cambium, recommend 30-35 dB. A front to back of 30-35 dB makes sure that the back side AP is heard less than 30 dB than the int

Re: [AFMUG] to slant, or not to slant - that is the question

I agree. I've heard that ePMP can do both, but honestly I just don't trust having different polarities. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Adam Moffett wrote: > The DSP in the ePMP can do some kind of

Re: [AFMUG] Force 110

I have no doubt the gui performance will eventually improve, but I also have no doubt by old lady will eventually quit being a bitch. It does not change the fact I would some days really love to be able to just punch both in the face. Note, I would never punch the old lady in the face On Fri, Dec

Re: [AFMUG] to slant, or not to slant - that is the question

The DSP in the ePMP can do some kind of processing to correct for the 45 degree offset when you have slant on one end and V+H on the other. I might not be stating it with the correct technical jargon, but that's the gist of it. They sell a dual slant sector for the AP with the intent to use i

Re: [AFMUG] to slant, or not to slant - that is the question

Your AP & SM should always have the same antenna orientation. I promise you that you don’t want slant on the AP and not on the CPE. If the signal is so obstructed that the orientation is screwed up to the point that unmatched polarization is actually a benefit then there is something seriously

Re: [AFMUG] to slant, or not to slant - that is the question

Almost everything for me is linear. The only thing that was slant was the 2.4 AP sector - the 2.4 SMs were even linear. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Paul McCall wrote: > > > We are looking at sma

Re: [AFMUG] Force 110

Sorry but your 450 radios cost way too much to do 5.1. ePMP does the entire band and the CPEs aren't $600. And as we found out yesterday the POEs aren't $100. I can install 5 people with the same hardware costs that a single 450 would cost me. 5x revenue and growth for me and my customers. Jo

Re: [AFMUG] Force 110

Hi George, The apostrophe in the device name has been fixed and is included in the latest release. Dan Sullivan ePMP Software Manager From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Sriram Chaturvedi Sent: Friday, December 04, 2015 12:42 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Force 110 S

[AFMUG] to slant, or not to slant - that is the question

We are looking at smaller sector sizes for a 5 Ghz ePMP cluster (60 degree probably), and am considering my options, which might also increase my gain quite a bit. Using a non-Dual Slant sector such as AM-5AC21-60, would increase my options. There have been a calling threads on Cambium's sit

Re: [AFMUG] Force 110

Sorry, a couple of typos. I meant to say the look and feel won’t change much as all the work is being done on the underlying GUI engine to improve performance and stability. Thanks, Sriram Join the Conversation Cambium Networks Community Forum On Dec 4,

Re: [AFMUG] Force 110

Sri’s message must have been cut off… the rest of it said, “…and in the meantime, please buy more PMP 450!” Matt From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Sriram Chaturvedi Sent: Friday, December 04, 2015 12:36 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Force 110 Hi Steve, We have been

Re: [AFMUG] Force 110

Hi Steve, We have been prioritizing radio performance over the GUI for a very long time. But, like Josh indicated, we made some incremental improvements in GUI performance in 2.4 and 2.5 releases but we are fully aware its not enough. The team has been working on a wholesale rework of the GUI e

Re: [AFMUG] PMP430

I have 5.7 sm's if anyone needs them to use with these ap's! On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Sean Heskett wrote: > Dang, we only use them in 5.4. > > > > On Friday, December 4, 2015, wrote: > >> 5.7 >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Dec 4, 2015, at 9:51 AM, Sean Heskett wrote: >> >> What freq

Re: [AFMUG] Force 110

It does seem slightly better in 2.5.1 than what it did in 2.3, but there is a good bit of room for speed improvements. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 1:22 PM, George Skorup wrote: > I can deal with the GUI b

Re: [AFMUG] Force 110

I can deal with the GUI being stupid and slow because the performance is better than UBNT On 12/4/2015 12:11 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: the biggest complaint i have is that rather than just loading the components on the page you are on, it loads the entire webserver and only displays the

Re: [AFMUG] what to do with 2.4 fsk?

> I will keep this in mind if we decide to get rid of the gear, I hate to see > it get scrapped if its useful Have you tried ebaying it?

Re: [AFMUG] Force 110

Dude have you not seen the eAlign page? That's like the best tool in the world... Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 1:11 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > the biggest complaint i h

Re: [AFMUG] Force 110

the biggest complaint i have is that rather than just loading the components on the page you are on, it loads the entire webserver and only displays the components of that page, very inefficient Im lazy too, I like a site survey option, it makes life easier for techs to not have to know every poss

Re: [AFMUG] Force 110

Working great here. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 4, 2015 1:07 PM, "Josh Baird" wrote: > What are your problems? > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Adam Moffett wrote: > >> I wish a GUI glitch was the worst of my problems.

Re: [AFMUG] Force 110

What are your problems? On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Adam Moffett wrote: > I wish a GUI glitch was the worst of my problems. > > On 12/4/2015 12:57 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: > > The more We are using EPMP the more i wish the radios had a face so i > could punch it in the face > > On Th

Re: [AFMUG] Force 110

I wish a GUI glitch was the worst of my problems. On 12/4/2015 12:57 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: The more We are using EPMP the more i wish the radios had a face so i could punch it in the face On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:35 PM, George Skorup > wrote: Yes. You

Re: [AFMUG] Force 110

You crack me up!!! Sincerely, Joshaven Potter MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, UACA Google Hangouts: yourt...@gmail.com Cell & SMS: 1-517-607-9370 supp...@joshaven.com > On Dec 4, 2015, at 12:57 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm > wrote: > > The more We are using EPMP the more i wish the radios had a fa

Re: [AFMUG] Force 110

The more We are using EPMP the more i wish the radios had a face so i could punch it in the face On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:35 PM, George Skorup wrote: > Yes. You cannot have single quotes in the device name. I tried that once > and the radio acted really stupid. None of the config would display.

Re: [AFMUG] what to do with 2.4 fsk?

I will keep this in mind if we decide to get rid of the gear, I hate to see it get scrapped if its useful On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Joshaven Mailing Lists wrote: > My Hatti contact would be a bit of both and the equipment could be > earmarked for one or the other. In Hatti even for profi

Re: [AFMUG] what to do with 2.4 fsk?

My Hatti contact would be a bit of both and the equipment could be earmarked for one or the other. In Hatti even for profit ventures are a bit of a humanitarian effort. If you are sending them cheap functional hardware I can help the connection be transparent. I haven’t spoken to them to be s

Re: [AFMUG] what to do with 2.4 fsk?

are you talking humanitarian or for profit emerging markets? On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Joshaven Mailing Lists wrote: > I’m not operating in Costa Rica but I have contacts in Belize and Hatti > and other emerging markets. If you want to send me a list and your willing > to ship it off to a

Re: [AFMUG] Need new billing solution asap!!!

https://github.com/spencerlambert/wisp-central-control On 12/4/2015 10:08 AM, Jeremy wrote: Isn't Spencer Lambert's web front-end free? Last time I saw him at Animal Farm he was touting it and said he would help with setup and customization at a flat rate of $100/hr. He is located in Utah, a

Re: [AFMUG] 450i and Syncinjectors

Thank you Forrest. Most appreciated. On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) < li...@packetflux.com> wrote: > I didn't because it varies depending on the exact type of cable, install > methods, etc etc etc. > On Dec 3, 2015 11:02 AM, "Josh Luthman" > wrote: > >> If you h

Re: [AFMUG] Need new billing solution asap!!!

Isn't Spencer Lambert's web front-end free? Last time I saw him at Animal Farm he was touting it and said he would help with setup and customization at a flat rate of $100/hr. He is located in Utah, also. If you want something cheap or free that may be an option. It would probably be worth cont

Re: [AFMUG] Need new billing solution asap!!!

I've been looking at https://www.whmcs.com/ I have a friend that uses it for his ventrillo voice business and it does auto billing and ticketing and is cheap. I think you can get a hosted solution if you don't want to install it. Craig schmaderer Skywave Wireless, Inc. On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 a

[AFMUG] Canopy 450i SM POE

Thanks for the reply Matt, glad to hear from cambium on the matter. I'm going to try the planet one that I linked to (it's a 30w 802.3at gige) which it sounds like will work to power just the SM. If nothing else we will use the PTP650 POE. Sean On Friday, December 4, 2015, Matt Mangriotis < ma

Re: [AFMUG] PMP430

Dang, we only use them in 5.4. On Friday, December 4, 2015, wrote: > 5.7 > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Dec 4, 2015, at 9:51 AM, Sean Heskett > wrote: > > What frequency? > > > On Friday, December 4, 2015, Justin Aldridge > wrote: > >> Anyone interested in some new PMP430 AP's >> >> -- >> Ju

Re: [AFMUG] PMP430

5.7 Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 4, 2015, at 9:51 AM, Sean Heskett wrote: > > What frequency? > > >> On Friday, December 4, 2015, Justin Aldridge >> wrote: >> Anyone interested in some new PMP430 AP's >> >> -- >> Justin Aldridge >> Total Highspeed >> 417-300-3534

Re: [AFMUG] what to do with 2.4 fsk?

I’m not operating in Costa Rica but I have contacts in Belize and Hatti and other emerging markets. If you want to send me a list and your willing to ship it off to a freight forwarder then I am pretty sure I could cover your shipping and some extra for your trouble. Sincerely, Joshaven Potter

Re: [AFMUG] PMP430

What frequency? On Friday, December 4, 2015, Justin Aldridge wrote: > Anyone interested in some new PMP430 AP's > > -- > Justin Aldridge > Total Highspeed > 417-300-3534 >

Re: [AFMUG] Need new billing solution asap!!!

Here is what I've always said about quality, cheap and fast. You can only pick two. You will never have all three. For this I need fast and quality. Cheap is relative in this case. I don't have a lot of customers so the $200/mo min that visp requires is about $100-150 too much for me. I'm fine

Re: [AFMUG] Need new billing solution asap!!!

Platypus will guide/aid you on the install for a one time fee. On Friday, December 4, 2015, Jon Bruce wrote: > +1 for Powercode > > On 12/4/2015 9:47 AM, Chris Fabien wrote: > > Good, cheap, and fast? You know what they say about that. > > We are reasonably happy with Powercode. Few gripes but

Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 450i SM POE

Actually, just to correct a little bit… The AUX port on the 450i radios is actually 802.3at as well. This means that you could potentially use a device that draws up to 30W of power. The 450i radio itself typically draws ~17W, but depending on cable length can (worst case) draw up to 19W. As

Re: [AFMUG] Need new billing solution asap!!!

+1 for Powercode On 12/4/2015 9:47 AM, Chris Fabien wrote: Good, cheap, and fast? You know what they say about that. We are reasonably happy with Powercode. Few gripes but it has never double or triple charged our customers. On Dec 4, 2015 1:35 AM, "Brett A Mansfield" mailto:li...@silverl

Re: [AFMUG] Need new billing solution asap!!!

Good, cheap, and fast? You know what they say about that. We are reasonably happy with Powercode. Few gripes but it has never double or triple charged our customers. On Dec 4, 2015 1:35 AM, "Brett A Mansfield" wrote: > I'm looking for a good billing solution that is cheap and I can have up in >

[AFMUG] PMP430

Anyone interested in some new PMP430 AP's -- Justin Aldridge Total Highspeed 417-300-3534

Re: [AFMUG] Need new billing solution asap!!!

There is mike from iwisp.gr is making an all and one setup. Like monitoring and billing rolled up on one. I am an iwisp.gr user right now. -Original Message- Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Need new billing solution asap!!! From: "Mike Hammett" To: af@afmug.com Date: 2015/12/04 14:31:52 Closer t

Re: [AFMUG] Need new billing solution asap!!!

The ones I was talking about are Quickbooks, Xero, and Freshbooks, etc They all do billing also. Jon Langeler Michwave Technologies, Inc. > On Dec 4, 2015, at 8:31 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: > > Closer to ten than three. ;-) > > WISPMon > Azotel > PowerCode > BillMax > Freeside > Platypus > Swi

Re: [AFMUG] Need new billing solution asap!!!

Closer to ten than three. ;-) WISPMon Azotel PowerCode BillMax Freeside Platypus SwiftFox VISP Whatever Simon is working on, but it's not out yet Some more, I'm sure. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://ww

Re: [AFMUG] Need new billing solution asap!!!

I actually successfully set it up and got it working about a year ago to play with it, and compared to a few others I played with, this one was a piece of cake. But I've been trying to set it up again for tha past month or two and I have hit a snag on a few steps. I should have just kept that o

Re: [AFMUG] Need new billing solution asap!!!

There's like 3 online based billing/accounting systems out there. Give them a try. Jon Langeler Michwave Technologies, Inc. > On Dec 4, 2015, at 1:35 AM, Brett A Mansfield > wrote: > > I'm looking for a good billing solution that is cheap and I can have up in > running immediately. > > I'v

Re: [AFMUG] Need new billing solution asap!!!

Brett, call me on Friday am and I'll be happy to help you with Platypus. Philip Rankin. 620-231-8188 On Dec 4, 2015 12:35 AM, "Brett A Mansfield" wrote: > I'm looking for a good billing solution that is cheap and I can have up in > running immediately. > > I've had far too many issues with my c