I vote as follows:
> ID Author(s)AI Title Pender Pend fee
> ---
> 8016* Alexis 2.4 PCOF [1]Alexis 3 sh.
FOR
> 8017* Alexis 3.0 RTRW Cleanups
I submit the following proposal and pend it with shinies.
-Aris
---
Title: Office Restructuring
Adoption index: 2.0
Author: Aris
Co-authors:
[Change the office rule so that a player can be confirmed as the non-interim
holder of an office by apathy. If e wants it, and no one else cares enough
Judge's arguments for CFJs 3625
While the caller's arguments are raise an interesting possibility, there are two
problems with them: eir message contained a contradiction, and eir logic is
faulty.
First, the contradiction. The caller said "I do not consent to abiding by any
rule stating that I
I vote as follows:
> Proposals distributed this week:
>
> ID Author(s)AI Title Pender Pend fee
> ---
> 8010* Alexis 3.0 End of an Era Alexis 3 sh.
AGAINST. As G.
ay making the automation because
> I thought it was going to be enacted tomorrow without any problems.*
>
> On Feb 11, 2018 01:46, "Aris Merchant" <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 7:02 PM Edward Murphy <emurph...@
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 7:02 PM Edward Murphy wrote:
> > 8008* CB [1] 1.0 Picto-Nomic CB [1] 3 sh.
> http://textbook.stpauls.br/International_Economics/images/pic061.jpg
> > 8009* Trigon, [2] 2.6 PAoaM v6 [3]Trigon 3 sh.
>
I claim a Platinum Ribbon.
-Aris
As Promotor, I remove this proposal from the Proposal Pool.
-Aris
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> I submit the following proposal, "Downsizing a redundancy", AI-2.5:
>
> ---
>
> In
I intend, with 2.0 Agoran Consent, to destroy each contract in
existence. None of them are being used, and they can always be
recreated later. I intend to take Notary, and want to clear the slate
first.
-Aris
I object.
-Aris
On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 5:19 PM ATMunn wrote:
> I intend for me and CB to win by apathy without objection.
>
> That probably doesn't work, but I haven't read the ruleset in ages so I
> have no idea.
>
> On 2/3/2018 7:19 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> > I
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 4:39 PM Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jan 2018 at 19:37 Aris Merchant <
> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> > Decision of whether
I submit (again) the following, and AP-pend it.
-Aris
---
Title: Contract Flexibility Act
Adoption index: 2.6
Author: Aris
Co-author(s): V.J. Rada, Ørjan
Amend Rule 2525, Interpreting Contracts, by:
Removing item 6 of the numbered list and renumbering appropriately; and
Changing the phrase
I vote as follows:
> ID Author(s)AI Title Pender Pend fee
> ---
> 8003* Corona 3.0 Asset fix Corona 1 AP
FOR, although assets are in need of a more
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 8:48 PM, Edward Murphy wrote:
>> 7998* Murphy, [1] 2.4 Eastman weeks Murphy 1 AP
>
FOR, as a necessary improvement over the current roundabout way of doing
things.
>>
>> 7999* Alexis 2.0 Party's Over, Back to Work Alexis
I submit and pend the following proposal.
-Aris
---
Title: Power Creep Reduction Act
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: Aris
Co-authors:
Amend Rule 217, "Interpreting the Rules", by changing the text
"Definitions in lower-powered Rules do not overrule common-sense
interpretations or common
TTttPF.
-Aris
On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Aris Merchant
<thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 6:05 AM, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Having won the game by expenditure of Balloons, I hereby appoint Aris as
>> Speaker.
&g
Well, why doesn't someone do so? I flip Quazie's master switch to Agora.
-Aris
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 3:26 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
> Yes, but no one has flipped his master switch.
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>
I win the a game by spending balloons (under Rule 2537). Whether or not
this works is dependent upon the Clork's report, but there's a time limit
so I'm doing this now.
-Aris
I retract any previous vote, and vote [Murphy, o].
-Aris
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 10:36 AM ATMunn wrote:
> I change my vote to {Murphy, o}.
>
> On 12/18/2017 12:31 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> > I change my vote in the Arbitor election to {Murphy}.
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 18,
I claim a reward of 5 shinies for publishing the Promotor's weekly report.
-Aris
On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 6:01 PM Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
> > As per my duties as ADoP, I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to
> > select the winner of the Arbitor election.
> >
> > For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the quorum is 8
> > [I think?], the valid
:52 PM Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I vote FOR.
>
> On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 at 21:04 Aris Merchant <
> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> > Decision of whether to adop
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 6:00 PM ATMunn wrote:
> I award the following Efficiency favours:
>
> 4 to Alexis for Prime Minister, Rulekeepor
> 3 to Aris for Promotor and Regkeepor
> 2 to ATMunn for ADoP
> 1 to Corona for Herald
> 6 to o for Notary, Surveyor, and Treasuror
>
I CoE this and the previous Clork report for not showing my standing with
the Row-Reduced politicians.
-Aris
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 7:27 PM Telnaior wrote:
> I create a new Politician with the name Awuton Cyroce in the Costume
> Conservatives.
>
>
> PARTIES AND FAVOURS
>
I assign the judgments as indicated in the quoted message. I will
produce a corrected version of the opinion, but I'm a bit busy at the
moment. Any changes likely be minor, and will not affect the core of
the argument.
-Aris
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Aris Merchant
<thoughtsoflifeandl
I support, regretfully. You've been a great Arbitor, G., and I hope
you'll do it again someday.
-Aris
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Much appreciated, genuinely.
>
> Need to take a real life break tho, so losing an officer regardless.
>
>
I vote as follows:
> ID Author(s) AITitlePender Pend fee
> ---
> 7989* Telnaior 3.0 Don't FAGE the FAGE Telnaior1 AP
FOR. If someone with time would look for
As Promotor, I remove this proposal from the pool. G.'s reform seems
likely to pass soon, with the primary objection being minor and easy
to correct, so this shouldn't be necessary.
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 7:04 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> Honestly, I think that some of the
I object. You were just elected. You, not P.S.S. To be clear, I'm not
opposed to P.S.S. holding the office, but now that you've run for it and
won, it is the will of Agora that you hold on to it, not immediately swap
with someone else.
-Aris
On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 2:22 PM Publius Scribonius
I vote [o]. When did everyone start using curly braces instead of square
brackets?
-Aris
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 3:47 PM Corona wrote:
> I vote {}.
>
> On 12/1/17, ATMunn wrote:
> > As per my duties as ADoP, I hereby initiate the Agoran
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 7:51 PM Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
> > On Nov 29, 2017, at 9:06 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry about this. What occurs here is that I enter all of the data into
> > a table and then the
Just so there's a doubt, I CoE the clock report on the basis that it
does not show my influence with the row-reduced politicians.
-Aris
On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Madeline wrote:
> No, pending CFJ.
>
>
>
> On 2017-11-27 12:58, VJ Rada wrote:
>>
>> did you do the ones
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 9:44 PM Alexis Hunt wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 at 23:23 Gaelan Steele wrote:
>
> > I’ll take it.
> >
> > Gaelan
> >
>
> I intend, with 3 support, to resign as Referee, appointing Gaelan as my
> successor.
>
> -Alexis
>
I support.
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 9:04 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> As Treasuror, I flip the Floating Value to 18.
>
> Treasuror's Weekly Report
>
> Date of this report: Tue, 28 Nov 2017
> Date of last report: Tue, 21 Nov 2017
>
>
> Floating Value: 18
> Tax Rate:50
>
> Floating
I intend, with 2 support, to file a motion to reconsider this case, citing
my previous arguments. I don't particularly want V.J. Rada not to be
punished, but I do want an actual consideration of my arguments. I would
very much appreciate support so that we can get these issues resolved.
-Aris
On
I support.
-Aris
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 6:54 PM ATMunn wrote:
> I support.
>
> On 11/27/2017 8:56 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> >
> >> On Nov 22, 2017, at 6:50 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> >>
> >> I pay one shiny to create the following contract (destroying
I intend, with 2 support, to file a motion to reconsider this
judgement. It fails to consider the fact that all players are persons
under Rule 869, which states that "A registered person is a Player".
This provides very strong evidence that the rule should be interpreted
"a player or (a person
I vote {Corona, PSS}.
-Aris
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Telnaior wrote:
> I vote {Corona, PSS} for the Herald Election.
> Everyone please update your votes to give a second preference to keep VJ
> Rada from winning it.
TTttPF
-Aris
On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 5:04 PM Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Justice favors from your blue carding, ironically.
>
> There are several reasons I did this, despite being so opposed to scams in
> general:
>
> * It did not i
I spend 24 NPR favors to gain 16 influence over Mad Cap'n Tom. I advise em.
I spend 10 NPR favors to gain 10 influence over Politician
McPoliticianface. I advise em.
I spend 8 NPR favors to gain 12 influence over Mickey Joker. I advise
em. I spend 8 NPR favors to gain 12 influence over Nick P.
If Agora has fewer than 5 shinies, I pay it enough shinies that it has
5. I claim a reward of 5 shinies for my Promotor Report.
-Aris
I pend this for 1 AP.
-Aris
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 9:39 AM, ATMunn wrote:
> meh okay. I sure do change my mind quickly. (I really just shouldn't be so
> quick to pend proposals, though. :P)
>
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> Title: ADoP Obligation Clarification
I AP-pend this.
-Aris
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Aris Merchant
<thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I submit the following proposal (I wrote it a few days ago, but hadn't
> submitted it yet):
>
> {{Title: Contract Flexibility Act
> Adoption index: 2.6
> Au
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I vote:
>
>> 7973* Aris 1.0 Sky Pillars ArisOP [1]
PRESENT
>
>> 7974* V.J. Rada3.0 [2] Really minor fixes V.J. Rada 1 AP
AGAINST.
>
>> 7975* ATMunn, [3] 2.0
I vote {Corona, PSS} and FOR the proposal, which I identify as 7981.
-Aris
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 5:55 PM, ATMunn wrote:
> I vote {Corona, PSS} and FOR the proposal.
>
> On 11/24/2017 8:52 PM, ATMunn wrote:
>>
>> right.
>>
>> CoE: The campaign proposal decision has to
This message probably does absolutely nothing. Probably. There is also
a slim possibility that it is:
*Part of a scam
*Part of a plot to permanently end the game
*An attempt to destroy the universe
*An invitation for alliens to invade earth
*A warning to the Party that you're all traitors
*A cue
Judge's arguments for the Blue Card CFJ
Through a scam and abuse of the powers of the office of Referee, V.J. Rada
has recently and illegally come into the possession 3000 justice favors. This
is a matter of the utmost importance because these favors would allow em to
win the game in the new
I favor this CFJ, and can judge it immediately.
-Aris
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:49 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> Good, I'm glad o. This Blue Card is legal, but the penalty is not
> effective. I call an urgent CFJ with the statement: A blue card can
> only have a penalty imposed in
I do so.
-Aris
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Telnaior wrote:
> I support.
>
>
>
> On 2017-11-23 10:45, Alexis Hunt wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 at 05:47 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
>> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This still works because e
I support the intent to call in the pledge; or, if it was invalid,
intend with Agoran consent to call in the pledge. My basis for doing
so is that the notorious scamster E.E. Rafa has willfully intended,
contrived, and conspired (with emself; totally actual conspiracy) to
abuse eir official powers
I submit the following proposal (I wrote it a few days ago, but hadn't
submitted it yet):
{{Title: Contract Flexibility Act
Adoption index: 2.6
Author: Aris
Co-author(s): V.J. Rada, Ørjan
Amend Rule 2525, Interpreting Contracts, by:
Removing item 6 of the numbered list and renumbering
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:29 PM Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
> > On Nov 21, 2017, at 1:26 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
> >
> > This is my 48 hours notice. I intend to remove all parts of isnack2.0
> > except the third paragaph, then add the text "this contract has no
> >
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 9:28 PM Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2017, at 5:05 PM, Aris Merchant <
> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I intend, with Agoran Consent, to call in V.J Rada's pledge below. CFJ
> > 3597 determined th
On the off chance that this works, I claim a 5 shiny reward from Agora
for my Promotor report.
-Aris
On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 2:11 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> I issue myself a Red Card by Summary Judgement. This is for the offense of
> failing to pay for an Estate (Erehwon). This time period to pay actually
> expired just 4 days ago, so this is _well_ within the statute of
>
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to call in V.J Rada's pledge below. CFJ
3597 determined that e failed to pay for the estate validly. I
additionally request an appropriately strong sentence, as the
violation here was part of a deliberate scam, rather than being say an
accidental late report.
-Aris
Let's see what the reaction to this one is; I won't be surprised if my
ruling is controversial.
Judge's arguments for CFJ 3597
The caller's arguments do a pretty good job of summing up the situation.
V.J. Rada had to pay 1,011 shinies to Agora; instead of paying them at once,
as is customary, e
AP
-Aris
On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 1:27 AM, Aris Merchant
<thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
> pool. For this decision, the vote collector
Time Limit Fix", or, if it was
> not submitted because of the lack of a title, I submit it again with the
> aforementioned title.
>
>
> On 11/12/2017 2:51 AM, Aris Merchant wrote:
>>
>> Could you give it a title?
>>
>> -Aris
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 11, 2
Without objection, I do so.
-Aris
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Aris Merchant
<thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to retract all pledges is my possession.
>
> -Aris
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 3:47 PM VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.co
I support and do so.
-Aris
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 at 15:29 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>> I withdraw all my previous objections to deregistering players.
>>
>> I support all intents to deregister players
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 9:37 PM Owen Jacobson wrote:
> I destroy one stamp I own, which I made, to cause Agora to pay me 59 sh.
> I destroy one stamp I own, which I made, to cause Agora to pay me 59 sh.
>
> I claim a reward of 5 sh. apiece for each of the most recent
I intend, without objection, to retract all pledges is my possession.
-Aris
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 3:47 PM VJ Rada wrote:
> Apologies for sending that preemptively to a-b
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:46 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
>
> > This is the Referee's
that and was too lazy to check.
>>
>> If possible, I withdraw my CoE. (I don't think you can actually do that,
>> but again, too lazy to check. If you can't, then I suggest denying the CoE.)
>>
>> On 11/12/2017 8:23 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
>>>
>>> W
I withdraw my support in light of zombies passing. I'll wait to object
to see if anyone finds any more problems with the resolution.
-Aris
On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Aris Merchant
<thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I support all of these.
>
> -Aris
>
> On S
I buy a stamp for 6 shinies. I claim a reward of 5 shinies for my
Promotor report. I claim a reward of 5 shinies for my Regkeepor
report.
-Aris
*actual* sky.
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Aris Merchant
> <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I submit the following proposal as my silly proposal. I appoint Trigon
>> to be next week's silly person. If the appointment of Trigon failed, I
>> ap
I submit the following proposal as my silly proposal. I appoint Trigon
to be next week's silly person. If the appointment of Trigon failed, I
appoint ATMunn to be next week's silly person.
-Aris
---
Title: Sky Pillars
AI: 1.0
Author: Aris
It's hereby enacted
(The name being redacted):
If a
I support all of these.
-Aris
On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Telnaior wrote:
> Well... that can't possibly end poorly?
>
> I intend to deregister Ienpw III with 3 Agoran Support.
> I intend to deregister Bayushi with 3 Agoran Support.
> I intend to deregister ProofTechnique
If "Backed Out the Door" is not pending, I pend it for 1 AP.
-Aris
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 2:52 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> PF
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 9:52 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
>>
>> I call an AP CFJ w/ the statement: "Alexis's proposal 'Backed Out the
>>
Could you give it a title?
-Aris
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 5:34 PM, ATMunn wrote:
> ah yep, it does.
>
> I submit the following proposal [not going to pend it yet, idk if this is
> sufficient]:
> Author: ATMunn
> Co-Author: Alexis
> AI: 1
>
> Amend rule 2496 "Rewards" by
I do so.
-Aris
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 7:13 PM Telnaior <j...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
> I support.
>
>
> On 2017-11-11 14:03, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > I support. The ruling that time isn't taken into account is worrying, and
> > I'm not sure all the impl
I support. The ruling that time isn't taken into account is worrying, and
I'm not sure all the implications were fully considered.
-Aris
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 6:42 PM Alexis Hunt wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 at 21:39 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
>
For each player X except myself (sorry V.J.):
{
I create a pledge with the text "I shall not transfer pledges, unless
my name is Aris."
I transfer that pledge to X.
}
-Aris
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:43 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> Also "An asset generally CAN be destroyed by its
Apologies, I missed this. The one you expedited has been identified as
7963. As Promotor, I herby identify "Referee Reform and Card
Appealability"l as proposal 7964.
-Aris
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:37 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> H. Promotor, can you please assign IDs to this
I support.
Do not retort.
-Aris
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 3:45 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> As Herald I did wait to see
> How Silly we could truly be.
> And now with a few proposals in queue,
> We find that puns are easier to do.
> Poems though - are hard to plan!
> And
I point my finger at Alexis for failing to state quorum, recommending
a Blue Card, in the interest of consistency. I identify this proposal
as proposal 7963.
-Aris
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> I submit, pend for an AP, and expedite by specially
Judgment:
Clearly false, per CFJ 3587. The contract has been adjudged
ineffective, so this CFJ is IRRELEVANT.
---
-Aris
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 2:57 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> Obviously this is frivolously false, as my contract at the time did nothing.
>
> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at
mit the following proposal:
>>>
>>> Title: "Medals of Honour Fix"
>>> AI: 1
>>> Author: ATMunn
>>> Co-author(s):
>>>
>>> If there is a rule entitled "Medals of Honour", and it contains the
>>>
Agoran month", then amend that rule by replacing that
> phrase with "In the first 7 days of an Agoran month"
>
> On 11/5/2017 4:24 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
>>
>> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
>> Decision of whether to adop
I vote as follows.
>> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
>> Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
>> pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the
>> quorum is 6.0 and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is
>>
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 6:53 PM Owen Jacobson wrote:
> On Nov 1, 2017, at 9:50 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
>
> > Nichdel owns a pledge that says the following "I pledge to either
> > withdraw or pend the below proposal within 7 days from this message".
> > E's
I intend to destroy JA:tC with 2 Agora Consent, on the basis that it has
been judged INEFFECTIVE.
-Aris
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 4:58 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I object.
>
> On 10/30/2017 04:14 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> > I'm sorry, I intend to
As Promtor, I identify all proposals as listed below.
-Aris
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 6:40 AM, ATMunn wrote:
> Doing it correctly this time!
> If you already voted on this, please vote again.
>
> As per my duties as ADoP, I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to
> select
As Promotor, I identify all proposals as numbered below.
-Aris
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 6:38 AM, ATMunn wrote:
> Doing it correctly this time!
> Note: If you've already voted, you'll have to vote again.
>
> As the nomination period of the Surveyor election is over, and
I vote [Trigon, Alexis].
-Aris
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
> I vote [PSS, Alexis].
>
> On 10/30/2017 09:41 AM, ATMunn wrote:
>> Doing it correctly this time!
>> If you already voted, please vote again.
>>
>>
>> As
I vote as follows:
>
> ID Author(s) AI TitlePender Pend fee
> ---
> 7931* G. 3.0 Registration fix finally G. 1 sh.
FOR
> 7932* ATMunn, [1]1.0 A Reward
I support and do so.
-Aris
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 2:39 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> TtttPF
>
>
> On 10/29/2017 05:37 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> > Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't fully understand the issue. I support.
> >
> >
> >
I'm not Notary, just Promotor and Regkeepor. I think you mean o. I pay o 5
shinies to thank em for taking the job.
-Aris
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 3:24 PM VJ Rada wrote:
> This might be another tough week for Aris :(
>
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Kerim Aydin
I support the intent for an A.N. and object to the intent for a M.N.
Although the thesis is interesting, it is also very limited in scope.
-Aris
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
> I support the intent for an A.N.
>
> I
erim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Fri, 20 Oct 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
>> >> Actually
I support.
-Aris
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:45 PM Telnaior wrote:
> I support.
>
>
> On 2017-10-25 16:35, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> > Pursuant to rule 2493 (“Regulations”), I intend, without 2 objections or
> with consent, to recommend the following regulation. This regulation
Well, this seems like a fine basis for doing these. This is a notice of honor:
{{
ProofTechnique loses 1 karma for being inactive.
Trigon gains 1 karma for being an active new player.
}}
-Aris
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 6:47 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> This is a notice of honour
>
> I
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 5:57 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
> I deputise for he Rulekeepor to publish the below SLR:
>
> THE SHORT LOGICAL RULESET
CoE: There are brackets in R2520, in clear contravention of the
beginning of the contracts proposal.
I do so.
-Aris
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
> I support.
>
> --
> Trigon
>
> On Oct 22, 2017 7:07 PM, "Alexis Hunt" wrote:
>>
>> Ah, never mind, it has indeed been 14 days since the report was last
>> required to be
I support.
-Aris
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> Ah, never mind, it has indeed been 14 days since the report was last
> required to be published, meaning that this works without notice.
>
> I intend, with 2 support, to initiate an election for
, we need to rename the Tax Rate.
>
>
> On 10/22/2017 07:43 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
>> Not apart from deregistration and administrative fees, neither of
>> which would normally be considered taxes.
>>
>> -Aris
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 22,
As Promotor, I remove "Faster Auctions", by o, from the proposal pool.
-Aris
I submit the following proposal, and pend it for 1 AP.
-Aris
---
Title: It's death _and_ taxes
Adoption index: 1.0
Author: Aris
Co-author(s):
Lines beginning with hashmarks ("#") and comments in square brackets ("[]")
have no effect on the behavior of this proposal. They are not part of any
I submit the following proposal, and pend it for 1 AP.
-Aris
---
Title: Fix Campaign Proposals
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: Aris
Co-author(s): Ørjan
Change the power of the rule entitled "Campaign Proposals, with power 3"
to 3.0.
Retitle the rule "Campaign Proposals, with power 3" to "Campaign
801 - 900 of 1098 matches
Mail list logo