On 7/2/21 11:55 PM, Aris via agora-discussion wrote:
> I don't know if I'd vote FOR it with that change, but it could be
> interesting as a way of incentivising ruleset simplification. I'd have
> to reflect on whether I think ruleset simplification is a good thing.
> I certainly wouldn't like us
On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 8:46 PM Rebecca Lee via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 3, 2021 at 1:30 PM OatmealSurprise via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > I (Mask) hereby propose the following:
> > """
> > Reduce, Reuse, Recycle
> > On successful repeal of a
On 03/07/2021 03:45, Rebecca Lee via agora-discussion wrote:
On Sat, Jul 3, 2021 at 1:30 PM OatmealSurprise via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
I (Mask) hereby propose the following:
"""
Reduce, Reuse, Recycle
On successful repeal of a rule, the player who proposed the
> On Jun 30, 2021, at 7:53 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> By precedent, that list item is not a paragraph, just a part of one.
> Also, first person in proposals is weird, but probably works.
I think this would work as intended—it may use the term unconventionally, but
it’s
On 26/06/2021 02:36, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:>
Did we ever learn what these did?
I lost the hashed text for these contracts so it's impossible to say for
certain but using the four-letter identifiers and rough memories:
On 6/18/2021 11:50 AM, ATMunn wrote:
I intend, without
> On Jun 25, 2021, at 1:39 PM, ATMunn via agora-business
> wrote:
>
> On 6/18/2021 11:50 AM, ATMunn wrote:
>> I intend, without 2 objections, to terminate the contract "Contract No. 1:
>> GIFT".
>
> Having received no objections, I do so.
>> I intend, without 2 objections, to terminate the
On 6/18/2021 5:28 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
On Jun 18, 2021, at 8:46 AM, ATMunn via agora-business
wrote:
Good point. I intend, without objection, to revoke the promise
"Treasure" from the Lost and Found Department
I object; I believe the intent of that promise was to
On 6/18/21 12:40 AM, Rebecca Lee via agora-discussion wrote:
> I bid 661
NttPF
--
Jason Cobb
Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
On 6/18/21 12:39 AM, Rebecca Lee via agora-discussion wrote:
> Me too
NttPF
--
Jason Cobb
Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
On 6/18/21 12:37 AM, Telna via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2021-06-18 14:14, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> On 6/18/21 12:08 AM, Telna via agora-business wrote:
>>> Right, I'm glad for that! Was a bit further back than I was looking.
>>> I retract the quoted proposal and revoke the
On 2021-06-18 14:14, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
On 6/18/21 12:08 AM, Telna via agora-business wrote:
Right, I'm glad for that! Was a bit further back than I was looking.
I retract the quoted proposal and revoke the quoted promise.
Promise revocation from the Library can only be
On 6/17/21 9:48 AM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
> Twice, I expunge a blot from myself.
NttPF
--
Jason Cobb
Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 3:28 PM Rebecca Lee via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 3:20 PM Telna via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > I intend without objection to clean Rule 2635 "Floating Rate Fleet" by
> >
On Thu, 2021-06-17 at 15:28 +1000, Rebecca Lee via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Yep, it seems very clear to me that rule 2221 does not provide a mechanism
> for changing the rules. It needs to be amended to state that it takes
> precedence.
The usual way to make this work is for rules to say
On 2021-06-17 14:44, Trigon via agora-business wrote:> CFJ: Trigon
fulfilled eir obligation to track the Unit of Flotation for
the weeks of 31 May and 7 Jun.
Arguments: the portion of the text quoted above written by Trigon.
Arguments(?): CFJs 3792 / 3798 would seem to provide a lot of
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 2:46 PM Trigon via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 17/06/2021 04:41, Trigon via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On 17/06/2021 04:15, Rebecca Lee via agora-official wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 2:08 PM Telna via agora-business <
> >>
> On Jun 15, 2021, at 8:47 PM, Trigon via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> On 16/06/2021 03:34, Telna via agora-business wrote:
>> I Point my Finger at Trigon for not tracking the Unit of Flotation in eir
>> weekly report as directed by Rule 2635 "Floating Rate Fleet".
>
> Is failure to track
On Tue, 2021-06-15 at 17:20 -0500, notajumbleofnumbers via agora-
discussion wrote:
> I join that contract
You need to send this to agora-business; posts to agora-discussion
don't count.
--
ais523
Falsifian wrote:
I like the changes, though I don't know if I get "winsome".
Win some, lose some.
On 6/11/2021 8:02 AM, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 06, 2021 at 03:27:54PM -0400, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> I submit (but do not pend) the following proposal (stolen from Trigon
>> with permission):
>>
>> Title: The Name of the Win Cards
>>
>> Adoption index:
On Sun, Jun 06, 2021 at 03:28:59PM +, Falsifian wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 09:13:24PM +0100, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On Fri, 2021-06-04 at 15:46 +, Falsifian via agora-business wrote:
> > > I grant one Victory Point to myself (using my Legacy focus).
> > >
> > > I pay
On Sun, Jun 06, 2021 at 03:22:52PM +, Falsifian wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 11:01:43AM +1000, N. S. via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Nobody's congratulated you on the win but congratulations on a relatively
> > 'normal' win! Good job.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Falsifian
(Re-sending.)
--
On Thu, 2021-06-10 at 01:01 +0100, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> Promises trigger platonically, so I guess you now have 4 mostly useless
> Promises that might make people create victory cards in your
> possession, if they somehow gain the ability to do so. (Nobody got
> blotted because they
On 6/8/2021 9:39 AM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-06-08 at 09:22 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> I had a feeling you'd bring this one up when I saw you register and saw
>> that your computer delivery was faster than mine :) !
> My CFJ earlier was actually
On Tue, 2021-06-08 at 09:22 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> I had a feeling you'd bring this one up when I saw you register and saw
> that your computer delivery was faster than mine :) !
My CFJ earlier was actually primarily intended as a test of my delivery
times to -bus. I
On 6/8/2021 9:01 AM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-06-08, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>> I pay a fee of 1 Extra Vote to Buy Strength.
>> I pay a fee of 1 Extra Vote to Buy Strength.
>> I pay a fee of 1 Extra Vote to Buy Strength.
>> I pay a fee of 1 Extra Vote to
On 6/8/2021 8:56 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/8/21 11:53 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Oh crap well that's completely broken. I was madly trying to sculpt
>> Murphy's text and missed those differences.
>
>
> It seems to just break the repeal case? It
On 6/8/21 11:53 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> Oh crap well that's completely broken. I was madly trying to sculpt
> Murphy's text and missed those differences.
It seems to just break the repeal case? It seems like something that can
be fixed after enactment.
--
Jason Cobb
On 6/6/2021 11:23 PM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> Trying to make extra votes work is hard, though; either they break the
> game, or they do nothing, with not much in between. I think they worked
> better when they were tied to an asset that also had more common uses
> than boosting
On Sun, 2021-06-06 at 18:51 -0700, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 6:41 PM ais523 via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > Based on how much Aris is trying to hoover up all the Voting Cards
> > recently: Hey, Agora, you should probably make proposal 8565
> >
On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 6:41 PM ais523 via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2021-06-06 at 16:24 -0700, Aris Merchant via agora-business
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 1:19 PM Rose Strong via agora-business
> > wrote:
> > > I grant Aris a promise with the following text: "I Cuddlybanana
>
On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 3:21 AM Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>
> > On Jun 5, 2021, at 7:15 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> >
> > the Promotor
>
> aren't you…
Well, yes, but if I make extra work for
On 6/6/21 5:46 AM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
>
>> On Jun 4, 2021, at 2:58 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business
>> wrote:
>>
>> I submit (but do not pend) the following proposal:
>>
>> Title: Gauntlet announcement patch
>>
>> Adoption index: 2.0
>>
>> Author: Jason
>>
>> Coauthors:
On 6/6/21 5:36 AM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
>
>> On Jun 4, 2021, at 9:17 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business
>> wrote:
>>
>> Amend rule 1950 by appending the following to the first paragraph: " If
>> a referendum has an adoption index less than the adoption index of its
>>
> On Jun 5, 2021, at 7:15 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business
> wrote:
>
> the Promotor
aren't you…
On 6/5/2021 6:23 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 6:13 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On 6/5/2021 4:55 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote:
>>> Title: Determinacy is a Good Thing
>>> Adoption index: 1.7
>>> Author: Aris
>>
>> Want to lodge a bit of a
On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 6:13 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
>
> On 6/5/2021 4:55 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote:
> > Title: Determinacy is a Good Thing
> > Adoption index: 1.7
> > Author: Aris
>
> Want to lodge a bit of a protest here - paradox to me is inherent to
>
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 10:01 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/23/2021 2:21 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 4:12 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-business
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> After the nomination period ends, the ADoP (or, if the
On 5/23/2021 2:21 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 4:12 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-business
> wrote:
>>
>> After the nomination period ends, the ADoP (or, if the office is
>> the ADoP, the Assessor) CAN and, in a timely fashion, SHALL:
>>
>>
On 5/20/2021 1:44 AM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
>
>
>> On May 19, 2021, at 6:36 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business
>> wrote:
>>
>> I bid 670 coins on the Protection Stone.
>
> For each stone being auctioned, I bid n-1 coins, where n is the value of the
> current highest bid on
Gaelan wrote:
What would everybody think about substantially reducing the standard
required for finger-pointing--something along the lines of this: {
A player CAN by announcement Point eir Finger at a player (the perp),
specifying alleged violation of the rules or commission of a crime by
that
On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 4:37 PM Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 2, 2021, at 9:15 AM, Falsifian via agora-business
> > wrote:
> >
> > I Point my Finger at myself for failing to publish a weekly report as
> > Editor of the Agoran Press contract for the week of April
On 4/25/21 12:56 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
> Belated gratuitous arguments:
>
> An amendment that changes some other substantive aspect of a rule (e.g.
> its Power) ought to count as a rule change, and ought to require the
> Rulekeepor to record it, unless the rules explicitly
Right, I misread.
(/me wonders if we need rules about obfuscated non-objections)
Gaelan
> On Apr 8, 2021, at 4:55 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> On 4/8/21 7:53 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Er, my mail client says Jason objected on April 2, 10 PM PDT in a
On 4/8/21 7:53 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
> Er, my mail client says Jason objected on April 2, 10 PM PDT in a message to
> BUS.
That wasn't an objection to the RWO intent, that was an objection to a
random sentence that Aris wrote that started with "I intend".
See [0].
On 4/8/21 11:53 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
Er, my mail client says Jason objected on April 2, 10 PM PDT in a message to
BUS.
On Apr 8, 2021, at 4:51 PM, Trigon via agora-business
wrote:
On 4/2/21 11:07 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-business wrote:
RWO might not work, but
Falsifian wrote:
I'm confused about a couple of things...
Abstractly, the situation is as follows:
* Just before time T, rule R had body B0 and revision number R0.
* Document D alleges that, at time T, rule R had body B1 and revision
number R1.
* At time T+Y, document D is
CUDDLEBEAM #1 WOOHOO
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 8:25 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 3/26/21 4:05 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 12:52 PM Aris Merchant
> > wrote:
> >>> I think that this thesis represents
On 3/26/21 4:05 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 12:52 PM Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>>> I think that this thesis represents significant effort, at least enough
>>> for a Baccalaureate of Nomic. I do not know if it represents enough for
>>> a Doctorate, but if
On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 12:52 PM Aris Merchant
wrote:
>>
>> I think that this thesis represents significant effort, at least enough
>> for a Baccalaureate of Nomic. I do not know if it represents enough for
>> a Doctorate, but if it is decided that that is the correct level, a
>> D.N.Sci. seems
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 01:21:10PM -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On 3/19/2021 12:51 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
> >> On Mar 19, 2021, at 12:17 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> {
> >>
> >> Amend Rule 2465, "Victory by Apathy", by
On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 11:23 AM Reuben Staley via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 3/20/21 8:27 AM, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On Saturday, March 20, 2021 9:26:08 AM CDT nix via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> >> On Friday, March 19, 2021 11:26:16 PM CDT Jason
On 3/20/21 8:27 AM, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
On Saturday, March 20, 2021 9:26:08 AM CDT nix via agora-discussion wrote:
On Friday, March 19, 2021 11:26:16 PM CDT Jason Cobb via agora-business
wrote:
H. Herald, I submit the following document as a thesis in the hopes of
earning a
On Saturday, March 20, 2021 9:26:08 AM CDT nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Friday, March 19, 2021 11:26:16 PM CDT Jason Cobb via agora-business
wrote:
> > H. Herald, I submit the following document as a thesis in the hopes of
> > earning a degree.
>
> Here's what the rules have to say about
On 3/19/2021 12:51 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On Mar 19, 2021, at 12:17 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business
>> wrote:
>>
>> {
>>
>> Amend Rule 2465, "Victory by Apathy", by replacing the final "."
>> character with the following: ", except for those who have won the game
>>
> Statement from Aris:
>
> This wasn't brought up on list at the time of the proto, and I'm sorry
> about that. That said... this is really hard to read. Like, I don't
> generally mind doing mental diffs for rules that are a paragraph long
> or something. But expecting people to do mental diffs
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 3:45 PM Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
>
> > On Feb 20, 2021, at 11:13 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business
> > wrote:
> >
> > I submit the following proposal.
> >
> > -Aris
> > ---
> > Title: You CAN, CAN'T You?
> > Adoption index: 3.0
> > Author: Aris
> >
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 8:46 PM Falsifian wrote:
> Here is my draft. Could anyone point me to precedent about what it
> means for information to be "reasonably available"? My draft includes
> my own reasoning, but if it's been covered previously I should use that
> or at least mention it. That's
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 8:59 PM Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 16, 2021, at 5:50 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 8:46 PM Falsifian via agora-business
> >
> On Feb 16, 2021, at 5:50 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 8:46 PM Falsifian via agora-business
> wrote:
>>
>> I file a motion to extend CFJ 3899.
>>
>> Here is my draft. Could anyone point me to precedent about what it
>> means for information
On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 03:31:11PM -0800, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Falsifian wrote:
>
> > > > === CFJ 3898
> > > > ===
> > > >
> > > > The time at which an intent to do something without objection
> > > >
On 2/6/21 6:31 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
> Falsifian wrote:
>
=== CFJ 3898 ===
The time at which an intent to do something without objection
becomes resolvable is a deadline.
Falsifian wrote:
=== CFJ 3898 ===
The time at which an intent to do something without objection
becomes resolvable is a deadline.
==
...
I find
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 09:18:38AM -0800, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> I'm considering a motion to reconsider this case, and would like comments.
>
> Reasons: ID Numbers are nowhere explicitly defined. So what's an ID
> number? It's a number used to ID a rule. Once a SLR has
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 09:03:39AM -0500, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2/4/21 8:00 AM, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote:
> > A member of this contract (the Client) can act on behalf of Cuddlebeam to
> > have him object to an intent via a message, if that message only causes
> >
On 2/4/21 3:20 PM, Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion wrote:
> I claim that the creator of the above promise is Aris
Said Cuddlebeam, non-publicly.
--
Jason Cobb
Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 11:03 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> On 2/4/2021 10:57 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> > Amend Rule 478 by replacing "Actions in messages (including
> > sub-messages) are performed in the order they appear in the
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 01:26:32PM -0800, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On 1/29/2021 5:55 AM, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On 1/29/21 7:52 AM, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> >> The issue is a white ribbon scam. The pet argument (that your pet can
> >> consent to play a
On 1/29/2021 5:55 AM, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 1/29/21 7:52 AM, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
>> The issue is a white ribbon scam. The pet argument (that your pet can
>> consent to play a game with you) allows a single individual to generate
>> a new white ribbon, which is
On 1/29/21 7:52 AM, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> The issue is a white ribbon scam. The pet argument (that your pet can
> consent to play a game with you) allows a single individual to generate
> a new white ribbon, which is extremely valuable. Working with other
> Agorans means you have to
On 1/28/21 11:44 PM, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> 8535* Aris, nix, G., Gaelan 3.0 We the People
>> PRESENT due to a potential issue with persons including pets that you
>> could argue can choose to play with you as a group. I'm debating AGAINST
> ...
>> --
>> nix
> I'm not
On 1/20/21 1:03 PM, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 1/18/21 3:42 PM, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote:
>> I wield my Concentration Stone, specifying Gaelan!
>>
>> I cash in the promise.
> This failed. CB does not have a concentration stone because the
> transaction that would have given
On 1/22/21 5:15 AM, Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion wrote:
> "Also the Buying Strength cap is gone."
>
> This feels pretty dangerous. Couldn't one single player (or a very small
> group of them) could force any proposal through?
There's still a limit on overall Voting Strength (15). But yes,
On 1/21/21 9:26 PM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 21:20 -0500, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> On 1/21/21 9:16 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>>> I consent.
>> Okay I withdraw this consent because I'm terrified now.
> I suspect this is similar to "I
On 1/21/21 8:01 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Amend R2422, "Voting Strength" by replacing:
>>
>> A player CAN Buy Strength by paying 1 Extra Vote and specifying a
>> current Agoran decision on which e is a voter. For each time a
>> player has Bought Strength
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 09:22:14AM -0800, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On 1/20/2021 9:13 AM, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
> >> If an inactice player has been inactive continuously for the past
> >
> > typo: "inactice" twice
> >
> >> 60 days, then any player
On 1/20/2021 9:13 AM, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
>> If an inactice player has been inactive continuously for the past
>
> typo: "inactice" twice
>
>> 60 days, then any player CAN deregister em with notice; for such
>> a deregistration to be successful, the
Or maybe even a contract where one person can just do all of them for all
interested parties.
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 6:33 PM Cuddle Beam wrote:
> Hm, you have a point. I could do it as just a signature kind of thing
> though. Same amount of messages, no spam, and it achieves the effect I'm
>
Hm, you have a point. I could do it as just a signature kind of thing
though. Same amount of messages, no spam, and it achieves the effect I'm
looking for.
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 5:17 PM nix via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 1/18/21 10:13 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
On 1/18/21 10:13 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> Yes, I agree entirely. Which is why I mentioned that I should just do
> this frequently ("in between reports").
Seems pretty rude. If everyone adopted this strategy, it would just be
constant spam.
--
nix
Webmastor, Ministor, Herald
Yes, I agree entirely. Which is why I mentioned that I should just do this
frequently ("in between reports").
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 3:50 PM nix via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 1/18/21 4:45 AM, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote:
> > What I'm going to
On 1/16/2021 2:25 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 1/16/21 5:24 PM, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> Award all Patent Titles to eir former holders that were lost solely due
>>> to the entity not being a person (under any current or former definition
>>> of "person"),
> > "Every intelligence is a person."
> >
> > Is a chatbot an intelligence? I worry that "intelligence" may be more
> > broad than we want.
>
> The OED entry I was going for "An intelligent or rational being, esp.
> a spiritual one, or one alien to mankind". But, like, obviously not
> the
On 1/16/21 5:24 PM, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Award all Patent Titles to eir former holders that were lost solely due
>> to the entity not being a person (under any current or former definition
>> of "person"), other than Hero of Agora Nomic or Grand Hero of Agora Nomic.
> Is the
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 10:01 PM Falsifian via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> > {
> > Title: Personhood
> > Adoption index: 3.0
> > Author: Aris
> > Co-authors: Trigon, nix, G., Jason, ATMunn
> >
> >
> > Amend Rule 869, "How to Join and Leave Agora", by replacing:
> >
> > Any entity that is or
> {
> Title: Personhood
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Aris
> Co-authors: Trigon, nix, G., Jason, ATMunn
>
>
> Amend Rule 869, "How to Join and Leave Agora", by replacing:
>
> Any entity that is or ever was an organism generally capable of
> freely originating and communicating independent
On 1/13/21 4:57 AM, Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion wrote:
This is going to become a scam shitshow. And it will be glorious.
Only insofar as creating one new unregistered person per number of
friends you have is a scam. We discussed this on discord and it seems
that the two areas where this
This is going to become a scam shitshow. And it will be glorious.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 2:44 AM Aris Merchant via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 5:33 PM nix via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> >
> > On 1/12/21 7:18 PM, nix via agora-business
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 5:33 PM nix via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On 1/12/21 7:18 PM, nix via agora-business wrote:
> >
> > I submit, but do not pend, the following proposal:
> >
> > {
> > Title: Personhood Revisited
> > Power: 3.0
> > Author: nix
> > Co-Authors: Gaelan, Aris
> >
> > Amend R869
On 12/31/20 12:14 PM, nix via agora-business wrote:
> Having received 2 support, I initiate the Herald election. It is now the
> nomination period, and I become a candidate.
The nomination period is over (and has been for a couple days). H. ADoP
please resolve the election (I am the only
On 9/1/2021 6:54 am, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
>> The alternative is to consider those statements as an action conducted
>> within Agora. Game custom has strongly held that actions not explicitly
>> defined by the rules are ineffective, so this interpretation would seem
>> to satisfy
On 1/8/2021 2:54 PM, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
> E.g. if I said "I hereby express my gratitude for your hard work",
> that's not defined by the rules, but I would have thought it's
> nonetheless legally true and effective, because I did in fact express
> my gratitude by writing it,
On 1/4/21 4:03 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
On 1/4/21 3:59 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
On 1/4/21 5:58 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-business wrote:
On 1/4/21 3:56 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
On 1/4/21 5:55 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-business wrote:
On 4/1/2021 2:41 am, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> On 1/3/21 12:16 PM, JTAC via agora-business wrote:
>> Please be reminded that the Holiday ends at midnight UTC on 4th Jan 2021.
>>
>> I have deferred use of summary judgements for tardiness despite their
>> frequency during the Holiday due
On 4/1/2021 4:36 am, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, 2021-01-03 at 20:33 +, Falsifian via agora-business wrote:
>> [JTAC wrote:]
>>> This violation is forgivable. If the perp chooses to publish an
>>> apology, e must include the words "I must read the rules thoroughly
>>> when
On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 3:28 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On 1/3/21 6:26 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote:
> > If you're going to vote against this, it's IMO your responsibility to
> > make sure this gets cleaned up reasonably soon. Dictatorships are, by
> > tradition,
On 1/2/21 4:05 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
>
>
>> On Jan 2, 2021, at 1:41 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 1/2/21 4:06 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
>>> I deputize for Referee to find the quoted finger-pointing Shenanigans
>>> (because I
On 3/1/2021 6:05 am, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
>
>
>> On Jan 2, 2021, at 1:41 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 1/2/21 4:06 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
>>> I deputize for Referee to find the quoted finger-pointing Shenanigans
>>> (because I
> On Jan 2, 2021, at 1:41 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> On 1/2/21 4:06 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
>> I deputize for Referee to find the quoted finger-pointing Shenanigans
>> (because I "believe…that it would be ILLEGAL…to levy a fine", R2478/14).
>
>
>
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 10:57 AM nix via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> On 12/20/20 9:43 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business
> wrote:
> > Title: Specified Crime not Rule
> > Authors: PSS, nix
> > Power: 1.7
> > Text: {
> > Amend Rule 2478,
801 - 900 of 18802 matches
Mail list logo
