Andy Wenk Hamburg
GPG fingerprint C32E 275F BCF3 9DF6 4E55 21BD 45D3 5653 77F9
3D29
On 9. Sep 2020, at 20:09, Joan Touzet
wrote:
+1. Thanks for starting this, Paul. I was actually going to try
and
drive this a month or two ago, but things got busy for me.
I'd also support renaming it to '
, correct, fumble on my part. Kinda busy. Voting process is all
detailed here:
https://couchdb.apache.org/bylaws.html
Lazy majority PMC members have binding votes.
-Joan
Thank you,
Donat
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 20:32, Joan Touzet wrote:
FYI, Linux packages in test form are available now
in Jenkins for a while), so if anyone else
will notice that it might be just a question of waiting a little and try again
later.
Regards,
Eric
On Sep 15, 2020, at 15:00, Joan Touzet wrote:
Hi there,
Recently, I believe Eric Avdey (eiri) said that he wasn't able to restart a
Jenkins job.
I've
ween dbs on same cluster: ok
- links to docs: ok
+1
Thank you for creating the release, Joan!
-Nick
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:15 PM Joan Touzet wrote:
Hi everyone,
There have been no votes on this release. Are people available to try it
out? Tomorrow, I will be able to complete the binary b
Hi there,
Recently, I believe Eric Avdey (eiri) said that he wasn't able to
restart a Jenkins job.
I've checked with Infra and they state that anyone with committer access
should be able to restart any job, any stage, or replay a job.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20851
No
to look into the Mac build and binaries on Thursday. I hope nobody
minds extending the VOTE until then.
Thanks!
Jan
—
On 15. Sep 2020, at 04:15, Joan Touzet wrote:
Hi everyone,
There have been no votes on this release. Are people available to try it out?
Tomorrow, I will be able to complete
of the week for 2.5 weeks.
If 3.1.1 doesn't cut from this RC, for whatever reason, the next
opportunity I will have to turn the crank will be 5 October 2020.
-Joan
On 2020-09-11 6:53 p.m., Joan Touzet wrote:
Dear community,
I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.1.1
ppc64le from the
packages and the couchdb top-level Docker file by end of 2020, should
replacement machines not be made available.
Please discuss.
-Joan
On 2020-09-12 5:01 p.m., Joan Touzet wrote:
Hi Devs,
FYI per Jenkins:
> All nodes of label ‘ppc64le’ are offline
This is one of the reas
Congratulations Glynn - and welcome!
-Joan
On 2020-09-14 12:22 p.m., Michelle P wrote:
Dear community,
I am delighted to announce that Glynn Bird joins the Apache CouchDB Project
Management Committee today.
Glynn has made outstanding, sustained contributions to the project. This
://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Testing+a+Source+Release
On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 at 23:53, Joan Touzet wrote:
Dear community,
I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.1.1.
Changes since the last round:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/compare/3.1.1-RC1...3.1.1-RC2
but better than nothing)
-Joan
On 13/09/2020 03:57, Alessio 'Blaster' Biancalana wrote:
Hi Joan,
Do we have some documentation ready to read? I would feel safer not
volunteering for this alone but I'm glad to help for this kind of situation
:-)
Alessio
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 11:01 PM Joan Touzet wrote
ot even true for e.g. Node.JS or Python, any
time there would be (potentially GNU) libc bindings.
J
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 5:47 PM Joan Touzet wrote:
Hi Jarek,
I'm about to head out for 3 weeks, so I'm going to miss most of this
discussion. I've done my best to leave comments in your docume
feel
this is just continuing the double-standard I previously mentioned,
albeit in a different form.
Good luck with the effort, and thanks for taking on this herculean task.
-Joan
J.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 2:57 AM Allen Wittenauer
wrote:
On Sep 13, 2020, at 2:55 PM, Joan Tou
esktop app
that runs in Java or Electron (Chrome as a desktop app), as two examples.
-Joan
J.
On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 11:09 PM Joan Touzet wrote:
HI Jarek,
Can you comment on one specific thing? In Proposal 1 you still leave the
text "...MUST only add binary/bytecode files".
HI Jarek,
Can you comment on one specific thing? In Proposal 1 you still leave the
text "...MUST only add binary/bytecode files". This is not possible for
convenience packages in many situations - for instance OpenOffice or
other languages - where providing a full release of a product
Hi Devs,
FYI per Jenkins:
> All nodes of label ‘ppc64le’ are offline
This is one of the reasons causing our Jenkins failures on master.
(The other is our usual heisenbugs in the test suite.)
I really would like it if someone on the PMC (other than me and Paul)
would agree to help keep Jenkins
Dear community,
I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.1.1.
Changes since the last round:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/compare/3.1.1-RC1...3.1.1-RC2
Candidate release notes:
https://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/whatsnew/3.1.html
We encourage the whole community
All - this vote is CANCELLED due to a late-breaking bug found by Paul
and fixed by Robert:
Fix buffer_response=true (#3145) #3147
I will cut a new RC tomorrow.
On 2020-09-10 1:25 p.m., Joan Touzet wrote:
Dear community,
I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.1.1
ing with
Infra on Monday.
Paul
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 1:11 PM Joan Touzet wrote:
Have been asking for it for a while ;) obviously +1.
Be aware that Jenkinsfile.full post-merge will probably fail because, at
the very least, the FreeBSD hosts won't have fdb and can't run docker to
container
Dear community,
I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.1.1.
Candidate release notes:
https://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/whatsnew/3.1.html
We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the
Have been asking for it for a while ;) obviously +1.
Be aware that Jenkinsfile.full post-merge will probably fail because, at
the very least, the FreeBSD hosts won't have fdb and can't run docker to
containerise it. This will need some exploration to resolve but
shouldn't be a blocker.
The
+1. Thanks for starting this, Paul. I was actually going to try and
drive this a month or two ago, but things got busy for me.
I'd also support renaming it to 'trunk' but really don't care what we pick.
The first commercial version control system I used to use, called that
branch "main":
Can someone have a look at this persistent failure? I've restarted the
agents on the FreeBSD box to no avail, the test still fails.
-Joan
Forwarded Message
Subject: [Jenkins] FAILURE: CouchDB » Full Platform Builds » 3.x #49
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 18:59:49 + (UTC)
From:
these possibilities. Along with those,
we could have another choice:
https://github.blog/2020-09-01-introducing-github-container-registry/
Alessio
Il lun 31 ago 2020, 20:41 Joan Touzet ha scritto:
On 31/08/2020 14:36, Joan Touzet wrote:
I'm also planning on filing a ticket with ASF Infra to ask
I remember this code!
Sure, let's get it out there, *as long as* someone is going to maintain
it going forward.
I had been hoping to see more rallying behind how to use the JWT
integration for OAuth and SAML workflows, but no one's done any
walkthroughs / blogposts that I've seen. Putting
Same - keep for now, choose to deprecate later.
Remember by our semver policy this would mean the earliest this endpoint
could be removed would be CouchDB 5.0 (!)
-Joan "time keeps on slippin', slippin'..." Touzet
On 2020-09-01 4:35 p.m., Jonathan Hall wrote:
Thanks for the explanation.
I
On 31/08/2020 14:36, Joan Touzet wrote:
I'm also planning on filing a ticket with ASF Infra to ask if there is
an alternative, such as moving these images under the apache org
namespace at Docker Hub. (Previously they informed us we could have a
single image there only, apache/couchdb
(Apologies if this is a double-post.)
Some of you who work with Docker may have received an email from them
recently, indicating they will be removing container images that have
not been used within the past 6 months:
https://www.docker.com/pricing/resource-consumption-updates
This isn't an
This email stuck with me overnight, and I want to address why. ermouth,
your attitude in this email was poor, and I'd like to give you the
opportunity to revise it.
On 2020-08-26 6:45 p.m., ermouth wrote:
The blog is controlled by the CouchDB PMC. No one outside of the PMC or
who they
, not good.
If you don't want to display it, don't click on it, and the iframe won't
This is not how things are protected, and I know that you know about it.
ermouth
чт, 27 авг. 2020 г. в 00:55, Joan Touzet :
At the moment, I have no plan to update Fauxton for 3.1.1.
The blog is controlled
Sounds like your couchjs process won't run correctly. When you run the
couchjs binary by hand, it should give an error - perhaps a missing
shared library? or you used to customize your query server and the
config changed in 2.3.x:
https://docs.couchdb.org/en/stable/whatsnew/2.3.html
Read the
Comments, in no particular order:
* I like that it's opt-in on a per-database level to create and maintain
the additional indexes.
* I like that this is an MVP for the feature, one that will get more
advanced over time.
* I guess we are putting off using maps (vs. records) until 4.x at the
-
Key: COUCHDB-3384
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-3384
Project: CouchDB
Issue Type: Test
Components: Test Suite
Reporter: Joan Touzet
Priority: Major
One instance so far
-
Key: COUCHDB-3384
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-3384
Project: CouchDB
Issue Type: Test
Components: Test Suite
Reporter: Joan Touzet
Priority: Major
One instance so far
Could we get these on the ci-couchdb server for testing? Thanks.
-Joan
On 2020-08-14 3:37 a.m., Gavin McDonald wrote:
Hi All,
For those of you waiting for the 'asf-ci' credentials - this is still not
resolved yet, and is waiting
for Cloudbees support.
However - I have created some new
Thanks, Jan.
The build seems to have failed due to some sort of timeout not under our
countrol.
I logged in and forced a manual rebuild, and it completed successfully.
-Joan "¯\_(ツ)_/¯" Touzet
On 13/08/2020 05:06, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
there were a few more of this in the moderation queue, I
Hey everyone,
Infra upgraded our Jenkins instance today. With this came a required
agent version update.
While our ARM and macos builders auto-updated (the Jenkins master can
ssh in to that node), all other machines needed their services
restarted. (Our runit run command always pulls down
Infra hasn't approved these in the past. If that policy changes, I'd
very much like to know about it.
For CouchDB we use a token on my account that I added for this purpose,
limited to Apache repos only. Of course, these API calls count towards
my personal limit, which affects other GitHub
Hi there,
Recently IBM donated their CouchDB+Clouseau (in RedHat UBI form) docker
container to the apache/couchdb-docker repository. One of their
customers, Grapevine AI, is asking if we can release this and publish it
under the apache/couchdb Docker Hub location.
As I said in the merge
root 4096 Jul 1 14:43 ..
-rw-r- 1 asf999 root 3494 Jul 1 14:43 asf999.pub
-rw--- 1 backup root 677 Jul 1 14:43 backup.pub
-rw-r--r-- 1 jenkins root 757 Jul 26 20:57 jenkins.pub
That last file (copied from the old VM) fixed the problem.
On 2020-07-26 4:34 p.m., Joan Touzet wrote
Ah, that's a missing pubkey in the jenkins user on repo-nightly, not
that the hostkey changed. I thought I got that, but apparently not. I'll
fix it today.
-Joan
On 2020-07-26 7:05 a.m., Jan Lehnardt wrote:
Hey all,
we are getting CI fails on master because the host key for repo-nightly
this to the table!
Alessio
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 6:45 PM Joan Touzet wrote:
We now have a plurality of +1s so I'm going to merge this.
On 21/07/2020 18:12, Joan Touzet wrote:
Please see lines 29-32 of the file. We can also make this change if we
want - which would send new/closed PR notifications to dev
We now have a plurality of +1s so I'm going to merge this.
On 21/07/2020 18:12, Joan Touzet wrote:
Please see lines 29-32 of the file. We can also make this change if we
want - which would send new/closed PR notifications to dev@, while
sending all comments/etc to notifications@ as we do today
Committers, please review this PR and provide your comments:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/3020
The text of the PR is as follows:
This introduces the `.asf.yaml` file, which gives us direct control over GitHub
features we've previously had to ask ASF Infra to maintain for us.
Hey y'all,
Infra contacted me recently over our couchdb-vm2.apache.org machine,
which needed to be deprecated and replaced with a new vm at a new
datacentre. That work is now done.
The new host is couchdb-vm.apache.org, and it runs Ubuntu 20.04. We have
2 CNAMEs (aliases) to this host:
On 2020-07-16 4:50 p.m., Joan Touzet wrote:
On 2020-07-16 2:24 p.m., Robert Samuel Newson wrote:
Agreed on all 4 points. On the final point, it's worth noting that a
continuous changes feed was two-phase, the first is indeed over a
snapshot of the db as of the start of the _changes
ed for all manner of multi-row responses,
not just _changes.
As this is a pretty big change to the isolation guarantees provided by the
database Bob volunteered to elevate the issue to the mailing list for a deeper
discussion.
Cheers, Adam
On Jul 15, 2020, at 11:38 AM, Joan Touzet wrote:
I'm having trouble following the thread...
On 14/07/2020 14:56, Adam Kocoloski wrote:
For cases where you’re not concerned about the snapshot isolation (e.g.
streaming an entire _changes feed), there is a small performance benefit to
requesting a new FDB transaction asynchronously before the
This is coming from the Erlang VM and telling you that you're nearly out
of available memory. CouchDB doesn't react well to running out of RAM;
it usually crashes.
While this warning will be suppressed in future versions of CouchDB, you
should probably check that you have enough RAM in your
Hi Kiril,
On 12/07/2020 15:43, Kiril Stankov wrote:
I see that some topics on the list are not in the github discussions and
vice versa?
Shall we all consider the mailing list obsolete and move to github?
Not at all. We're currently in early, closed beta testing of the GitHub
Discussions
Best option: use a reverse proxy like haproxy or nginx to inject these.
You can also terminate SSL at this layer for better SSL support and
performance.
-Joan
On 02/07/2020 05:01, Mody, Darshan Arvindkumar (Darshan) wrote:
Hi
In our project we would like to set the header
On 2020-06-24 1:32 p.m., Garren Smith wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 6:47 PM Joan Touzet wrote:
Hi Garren,
If the "options" field is left out, what is the default behaviour?
All group_levels will be indexed. I imagine this is what most CouchDB uses
will wan
Hi Garren,
If the "options" field is left out, what is the default behaviour?
Is there no way to specify multiple group_levels to get results that
match the original CouchDB behaviour? Your changed behaviour would be
acceptable if I could do something like `?group_level=2,3,4,5`.
-Joan
On
Hey Jarek, thanks for starting this thread. It's a thorny issue, for
sure, especially because binary releases are not "official" from an ASF
perspective.
(Of course, this is a technicality; the fact that your PMC is building
these and linking them from project pages, and/or publishing them
check`.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:04 AM Garren Smith wrote:
On the fdb branch we have a make check-fdb which is a subset of all the
tests that should pass. I think we should use that instead of make check
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 5:34 PM Joan Touzet wrote:
Took a bit longer than expected
AM Joan Touzet wrote:
Can you try opening an Infra ticket on this?
https://issues.apache.org/jira
Open it against the Infra project and share with them the link(s). You
can also link to this mailing list discussion via
https://lists.apache.org/ .
-Joan
On 2020-06-17 5:16 p.m., Alessio 'Blaster
of networking burb?
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 2:20 PM Joan Touzet wrote:
IBM maintains these workers for us - will have to ask Paul Davis to take
a look.
-Joan
On 17/06/2020 05:36, Alessio 'Blaster' Biancalana wrote:
Hey folks,
I have a job on Jenkins that is repeatedly giving me this error
giu 2020, 23:01 Paul Davis ha
scritto:
I looked at Jenkins and saw them all as connected and in sync. Is
there more to the report or was this some sort of networking burb?
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 2:20 PM Joan Touzet wrote:
IBM maintains these workers for us - will have to ask Paul Davis
IBM maintains these workers for us - will have to ask Paul Davis to take
a look.
-Joan
On 17/06/2020 05:36, Alessio 'Blaster' Biancalana wrote:
Hey folks,
I have a job on Jenkins that is repeatedly giving me this error:
On 14/06/2020 02:42, Ilya Novojilov wrote:
isn't CouchDB based on Apache Beam?
No. Not at all. Some of the dev team is friends with the Beam team, but
there's no direct connection.
You might have seen the `beam.smp` process running when you run CouchDB.
That's the Erlang VM:
Try specifying your git repository as
https://github.com/apache/guacamole-server instead of
git://github.com/apache/guacamole-server.git ? Just a guess.
On 09/06/2020 16:45, Mike Jumper wrote:
Hello all,
I've been trying to configure Jenkins jobs to automatically build pull
requests for the
ject and I was wondering - what required
actually to switch ON Discussion on GH? How idea started?
Thanks,
Piotr
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020, 10:48 PM Alessio 'Blaster' Biancalana <
dottorblas...@apache.org> wrote:
Woh! This is huuuge!
Thanks for making this happen :-)
Alessio
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020
Hi everyone,
Thanks to some personal connections and the support of ASF Infra, Apache
CouchDB now has GitHub Discussions enabled on our repository:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/discussions
Right now, we're beta testing this (in conjunction with MS/GitHub and
the ASF) as a new user
On 22. May 2020, at 19:31, Joan Touzet wrote:
I haven't gotten a lot of feedback on this proposal. (I know a lot of people
are marching towards deadlines right now.) I also don't want to take it to
users@, unless there's a reality of it happening.
In the interest of moving this forward, I'm goi
I received this private email. I don't have time to answer it, but if
anyone wants, feel free to respond to Lei directly.
-Joan
Forwarded Message
Subject:help for couchDB
Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 09:27:39 +0800
From: Lei Zhang
To: woh...@apache.org
Hi Joan,
On 2020-05-22 13:31, Joan Touzet wrote:
I haven't gotten a lot of feedback on this proposal. (I know a lot of
people are marching towards deadlines right now.) I also don't want to
take it to users@, unless there's a reality of it happening.
In the interest of moving this forward, I'm going
, this would be a non-technical
decision, allowing for lazy consensus and a lazy majority (3 binding
+1s, more binding +1s than binding -1s), with binding votes cast by
committers, and no vetos.
-Joan
On 2020-05-12 14:41, Joan Touzet wrote:
On 2020-05-12 5:46 a.m., Ilya Khlopotov wrote:
I
I'm curious what the Apache Security team's opinion is on this (they are
cc'ed on every email to secur...@couchdb.apache.org).
The detailed policy for the ASF is here:
https://www.apache.org/security/committers.html
The only reference here to public/private is step 11:
> The project team
Hi Alan,
On 2020-05-21 18:41, Alan Malta wrote:
Joan, indeed I had around 60 documents with conflicts. I managed to fix
them and I no longer see any conflicts. Low quality performance remains
though.
Double-check that you're not running out of memory (swapping to disk) or
CPU (lots of
e
Il giorno 20 mag 2020, alle ore 19:29, Joan Touzet ha
scritto:
Hi Andrea,
On 2020-05-20 9:37, Andrea Brancatelli wrote:
A client sent us a link about a supposed security problem with one of
our couchdb 2.3.1 instances.
He related to this https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/46595 which,
Hi Andrea,
On 2020-05-20 9:37, Andrea Brancatelli wrote:
A client sent us a link about a supposed security problem with one of
our couchdb 2.3.1 instances.
He related to this https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/46595 which, to
me, seems a quite confused report that, I guess, can be related to
HI Alan,
* What version of CouchDB?
* Do you regularly compact your databases?
* Have you looked for conflicted documents recently?
-Joan
On 2020-05-20 10:02, Alan Malta wrote:
Hi everyone,
it's been more than a week that I have been debugging a strange
performance problem with CouchDB;
Technically, the code still isn't on master yet.
:D
-Joan "can we please merge to master already" Touzet
On 2020-05-19 15:19, Paul Davis wrote:
Can +1 but its gonna feel really silly when I think about how the code
is already merged...
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 12:28 PM Joan Tou
Garren
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 11:14 PM Joan Touzet wrote:
The intent of the RFCs was to give people a place to look at what's
being done, comment on the implementation decisions, and to form the
basis for eventual documentation.
I think they've been relatively successful on the first two pieces
On 2020-05-17 3:06, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
Justin, which line of that file?
This one:
"Copyright 2020 The Apache Foundation”
It should be:
Copyright [] [name of copyright owner]
As it’s an instruction on how to apply the license to your own work.
PR up, needs +1 before merging
On 2020-05-17 2:43, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi there,
I took a look at your recent release and noticed a couple of issues. Be aware
I'm not part of your project, and I'm missing a large part of your history, so
these things may have been discussed before and are that way for good reasons.
- Your
The intent of the RFCs was to give people a place to look at what's
being done, comment on the implementation decisions, and to form the
basis for eventual documentation.
I think they've been relatively successful on the first two pieces, but
it sounds like they've fallen behind, especially
On 2020-05-13 10:07 a.m., Robert Samuel Newson wrote:
Hi,
Yes, I think this would be a good addition for 3.0. I think we didn't add it
before because of concerns of accidental misuse (attempting to replicate with
it but forgetting a range, etc)?
This was definitely a concern, but it
I presume the workaround would be "Replicate back to CouchDB 3.x, but
truncate to 236 characters in the process?" You'd lose fidelity in the
db name that way.
-Joan
On 2020-05-12 4:05 p.m., Robert Newson wrote:
I still don’t understand how the internal shard database name format has any
lock in.
Yup, that'd be a requirement from the ASF's perspective, regardless of
technology we select.
-Joan
Best regards,
ILYA
On 2020/05/11 19:04:53, Joan Touzet wrote:
On 2020-03-15 9:36, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
On Fri, 13 Mar 2020, at 14:35, Naomi Slater wrote:
apparently GitHub has
On 2020-03-15 9:36, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
On Fri, 13 Mar 2020, at 14:35, Naomi Slater wrote:
apparently GitHub has discussions now. it's still in beta, but you can
specifically request it if you want it if you contact support, I think
e.g., https://github.com/zeit/next.js/discussions
Hi Adam, dev@,
On 2020-05-06 11:40, Adam Kocoloski wrote:
When we looked at some of our internal usage data we found that _update had
measurably higher adoption than the rendering functions, so we didn’t push so
hard on deprecating it yet.
I’d feel better about removing this endpoint if
in the database compactor
-
On behalf of the CouchDB PMC,
Joan Touzet
in the database compactor
-
On behalf of the CouchDB PMC,
Joan Touzet
in the database compactor
-
On behalf of the CouchDB PMC,
Joan Touzet
in the database compactor
-
On behalf of the CouchDB PMC,
Joan Touzet
Dear community,
The vote has now closed.
Thank you to everyone who participated!
The results are:
+1 - 4 votes
+0 - 0 votes
-0 - 0 votes
-1 - 0 votes
The vote is PASED.
Thanks,
-Joan "Let's 3.1.0" Touzet
On 2020-04-30 0:02, Joan Touzet wrote:
(YES, this is an
Dear community,
The vote has now closed.
Thank you to everyone who participated!
The results are:
+1 - 4 votes
+0 - 0 votes
-0 - 0 votes
-1 - 0 votes
The vote is PASED.
Thanks,
-Joan "Let's also 3.0.1" Touzet
On 2020-04-30 0:00, Joan Touzet wrote:
Dear community
I suspect he means when replicating back to a 3.x or 2.x cluster.
On 2020-05-04 3:03 p.m., Robert Samuel Newson wrote:
But we don't need to add a file extension or a timestamp to database names.
B.
On 4 May 2020, at 18:42, Nick Vatamaniuc wrote:
Hello everyone,
Good idea, +1 with one
Dear community,
The Apache CouchDB 3.0.1 and 3.1.0 releases are ready to go. There will
be a short delay while we wait for the Apache mirror system to sync up.
I plan to make the announcement at:
Tuesday, 2020-05-04, 12:00:00 UTC-4
I will use these release notes:
Remove all admin users defined in [admins].
On 2020-05-03 3:23 p.m., Bill Stephenson wrote:
No, I want to play with it a bit to see how I can use it in Admin Party mode
(as if I just installed it).
—Bill
On May 3, 2020, at 2:19 PM, Daniel Holth wrote:
Do you want to find the local.ini
There is currently a vote happening for release of CouchDB 3.0.1 and
3.1.0 on the developers list. 3.1.0 introduces SpiderMonkey 68 support,
which is required for us to provide packages on Ubuntu 20.04 (Focal Fossa).
Chances are good the vote will past Monday. That means packages will
release
oxies.html?highlight=haproxy#reverse-proxying-with-nginx
-Joan "lisp machines are fun" Touzet
On 2020-05-01 15:29, Joel Jucá wrote:
You can make this setup using Nginx too. I'm unsure about haproxy but Nginx
is quite trivial to setup.
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 4:26 PM Joan Touzet wrote:
Hi B
voice.com/>
1-417-546-8390
On Apr 30, 2020, at 3:56 PM, Joan Touzet wrote:
On 2020-04-30 16:22, Rene Veerman wrote:
i'm really only looking for a quick and easy way to getting https to work
again..
Bill Stephenson gave you a step-by-step that seemed reasonable to me.
do the creators
You can find the binaries in the usual places:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/win/3.0.1/rc.2/
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/win/3.1.0/rc.2/
https://repo-nightly.couchdb.org/ (check in the 3.x and 3.0.x folders)
-Joan "enough CouchDB for today"
On 2020-04-30 16:22, Rene Veerman wrote:
i'm really only looking for a quick and easy way to getting https to work
again..
Bill Stephenson gave you a step-by-step that seemed reasonable to me.
do the creators of couchdb read this mailinglist?
Yes.
Most of us terminate SSL ahead of CouchDB
t;,"features":["access-ready","partitioned","pluggable-storage-engines","reshard","scheduler"],"vendor":{"name":"The
Apache Software Foundation"}}
fauxton self-check - passes
+1
On 2020-04-30 14:39, Joan Touzet
t;,"features":["access-ready","partitioned","pluggable-storage-engines","reshard","scheduler"],"vendor":{"name":"The
Apache Software Foundation"}}
fauxton self check - passes
+1
On 2020-04-30 14:38, Joan Touzet w
Dear community,
I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.1.0.
Changes since the last round:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/compare/3.1.0-RC1...3.1.0-RC2
Candidate release notes:
https://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/whatsnew/3.1.html
We encourage the whole community to
Dear community,
I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.0.1.
Changes since the last round:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/compare/3.0.1-RC1...3.0.1-RC2
Candidate release notes:
https://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/whatsnew/3.0.html#version-3-0-1
We encourage the
101 - 200 of 1602 matches
Mail list logo
