Tom,
> It it possible to have the Spam Report appended to the UBE which is sent
> to the sender? If yes, how is it accomplished?
Yes, but only if a message is considered spammy or spam
(score above tag2_level):
$defang_spam = 1;
Recipient must be local (must match @local_domains_maps).
Ma
Good morning List.
It it possible to have the Spam Report appended to the UBE which is sent
to the sender?
If yes, how is it accomplished?
Apologies for the post, just wondering.
Thanks
Tom
--
The ultimate all-in-on
Raman,
> Amavisd seems to skip spam scoring for some emails with BAD HEADER alerts:
> X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Missing required header field: "Date"
I'm not aware of spam tests being bypassed based on bad header, except when
a message is already known to be blocked for some other reaso
Amavisd seems to skip spam scoring for some emails with BAD HEADER alerts:
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Missing required header field: "Date"
This is very similar to a problem previously reported on this list:
http://old.nabble.com/BAD-HEADER-not-being-Spam---scored-td26201700.html
I too
Lucas,
> My amavisd is blocking a message becouse he thinks that're spam. But don't
>
> How can I show him that messages isn't a spam?
>
> Jan 14 10:43:14 mail amavis[5899]: (05899-11) Blocked SPAM, MYNETS LOCAL
> [187.5.xxx.xx] [187.5.xxx.xx] -> <
> silva...@sefaz.rs.gov.br>, quarantine: spam-
On 1/14/11 10:40 AM, drum.lu...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi!
>
> My amavisd is blocking a message becouse he thinks that're spam. But don't
>
> How can I show him that messages isn't a spam?
>
This is not very clear as to what you are asking.
are you the email admin? then post the whole email, headers a
Alex,
> Hello, first time posting. I inherited a CentOS 4.x box running
> amavisd-new (from rpmforge version 2.64) and spamassassin and postfix.
> I'm new to amavisd but have been trying to read up on config and
> searching the archive for some enlightenment and haven't found what I
> need.
>
> I
Hello, first time posting. I inherited a CentOS 4.x box running
amavisd-new (from rpmforge version 2.64) and spamassassin and postfix.
I'm new to amavisd but have been trying to read up on config and
searching the archive for some enlightenment and haven't found what I
need.
I have some mail that
On 5/30/10 6:15 AM, Harry Lachanas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a setup with debian ( lenny ) +postfix 2.5.5-1.1 +
> amavisd-new1:2.6.1.dfsg-1 + mysql + spamassassin 3.2.5-2+lenny2 + clamav ,
>
> Some times amavis delivers a message that is purely spam as Not-Spam ...
>
> However when I scan the mail f
Hi,
I have a setup with debian ( lenny ) +postfix 2.5.5-1.1 +
amavisd-new1:2.6.1.dfsg-1 + mysql + spamassassin 3.2.5-2+lenny2 + clamav ,
Some times amavis delivers a message that is purely spam as Not-Spam ...
However when I scan the mail from spamc as amavis user it detects it
correctly as s
Mark,
Thanks for the attention!
I had it working earlier yesterday after I added
$sa_tag3_level_deflt and also changed @spam_lovers_maps
in same way as you proposed. As I was stupid to do more
than one change at once, I thought it was the tag3 who
solved it... But as I understand now, I was wrong
ClaesBas,
> It looks like $sa_kill_level_deflt not working (for me)!
> Mailreceiver gets the mail even if Score is way above kill level.
> local_domains seems to be right, due to subject rewrite.
>
> Why does it get delivered and not "killed"?
Either the spam destiny was D_PASS, or recipient was
Hi,
It looks like $sa_kill_level_deflt not working (for me)!
Mailreceiver gets the mail even if Score is way above kill level.
local_domains seems to be right, due to subject rewrite.
Why does it get delivered and not "killed"?
Header in quarantined mail:
===
X-Spam-Fla
>>> From a spam message:
>>
>> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=2.168+5 tag=5.9 tag2=6.4 kill=6.9
>> tests=[AM:BOOST=5,
>> AWL=0.495, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_06=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
>> MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.672, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
>>
>> 2.168+5? 216800? Why the scientific notation?
* Michael Scheidell :
> >> From a spam message:
> >
> > X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=2.168+5 tag=5.9 tag2=6.4 kill=6.9
> > tests=[AM:BOOST=5,
> > AWL=0.495, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_06=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
> >MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.672, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
> >
> > 2.168+5? 216800?
>> From a spam message:
>
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=2.168+5 tag=5.9 tag2=6.4 kill=6.9 tests=[AM:BOOST=5,
> AWL=0.495, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_06=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
>MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.672, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
>
> 2.168+5? 216800? Why the scientific notation?
>
5+ 2.158
>From a spam message:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=2.168+5 tag=5.9 tag2=6.4 kill=6.9 tests=[AM:BOOST=5,
AWL=0.495, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_06=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.672, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
2.168+5? 216800? Why the scientific notation?
---
>>
>>
> I take the opportunity of this thread to ask about one behaviour, that I
> think is not uncommon. Has sense today to set defaults destiny values
> for spam to D_BOUNCE? I mean this: today 99.9% of SPAM comes from
> a faked email address, so bouncing it to the sender means to a faked
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 08:35:22PM +0100, Giuseppe Ghibò wrote:
> I take the opportunity of this thread to ask about one behaviour, that I
> think is not uncommon. Has sense today to set
> defaults destiny values for spam to D_BOUNCE? I mean this: today 99.9%
> of SPAM comes from
> a faked email ad
Giuseppe Ghibò wrote:
> Mark Martinec wrote:
>
>> Carlos,
>>
>>
>>
>>> how do I reject messages that have a high score of something like '5'?
>>>
>>>
You can't.
Spamassassin requires that your mail server actually accept the message
before it can be scanned because it need
Mark Martinec wrote:
> Carlos,
>
>
>> how do I reject messages that have a high score of something like '5'?
>>
>
>
>> X-Spam-Score: 11.543
>> $sa_kill_level_deflt = 6.31;
>> $final_spam_destiny = D_BOUNCE;
>>
>
> Yes, that should suffice. To block a message, $final_spam_destiny mus
Carlos,
> how do I reject messages that have a high score of something like '5'?
> X-Spam-Score: 11.543
> $sa_kill_level_deflt = 6.31;
> $final_spam_destiny = D_BOUNCE;
Yes, that should suffice. To block a message, $final_spam_destiny must
not be D_PASS, score must be above kill level, and recip
Carlos Williams schrieb am Friday, den 20. March 2009:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Michael Scheidell
> wrote:
> > Final destination set for pass?
>
> This does not make sense to me. Can you be more specific? Am I missing
> this parameter in the config file I am looking at? Does that go
>
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> See 20-debian_defaults
>
>
> $final_virus_destiny = D_DISCARD; # (data not lost, see virus
> quarantine)
> $final_banned_destiny = D_BOUNCE; # D_REJECT when front-end MTA
> $final_spam_destiny = D_BOUNCE;
> $final_bad_heade
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> Final destination set for pass?
This does not make sense to me. Can you be more specific? Am I missing
this parameter in the config file I am looking at? Does that go
somewhere else in
the /etc/amavis/conf.d file?
--
>
>
> $sa_spam_subject_tag = '***SPAM*** ';
> $sa_tag_level_deflt = 2.0; # add spam info headers if at, or above that
> level
> $sa_tag2_level_deflt = 6.31; # add 'spam detected' headers at that level
> $sa_kill_level_deflt = 6.31; # triggers spam evasive actions
> $sa_dsn_cutoff_level = 10; #
I have Amavisd-new installed and configured however I am trying to
understand how it works. It appears to be scoring my incoming messages
like SpamAssassin would however it appears I have SA installed but not
running:
This is fine however when I get a message, I do see in the headers
that someone
Noel Jones wrote:-
> Some of the domains linked to are listed in the various
> URIBLs, that helps some of them.
>
> If you're using clamav, the Sanesecurity addon signatures
> catch a lot of these.
> http://www.clamav.net
> http://www.sanesecurity.com/usage.htm
>
>
>-- Noel Jones
>
I am
Brian Jameson wrote:
> Where an e-mail refers to a link to an image containing spam is it possible
> to detect this and score it as appropriate. I have tried FuzzyOcr but it
> only looks at images embedded in the e-mail and not links. I have drawn a
> blank with Google. Any suggestions?
> regards
>
Where an e-mail refers to a link to an image containing spam is it possible
to detect this and score it as appropriate. I have tried FuzzyOcr but it
only looks at images embedded in the e-mail and not links. I have drawn a
blank with Google. Any suggestions?
regards
Brian.
---
Casey,
> Spam is properly identified and quarantined, but the Subject
> line is not re-written.
> I'd like the subject line to say "SPAM!" + the old subject line
$sa_spam_subject_tag = 'SPAM! ';
Cernohorsky Wolfgang writes:
> Your domain is listed in @local_domains_maps?
Indeed, your domains m
> Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 11:24:22 -0500
> From: Casey Bralla
> Subject: [AMaViS-user] Spam properly handled, but Subject is not
> Re-written
> To: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID: <200902011124.22950.maill...@nerdworld.org>
> Content-Type: text/
> On 2/1/09 8:24 AM, Casey Bralla wrote:
> > Problem Summary: Spam is properly identified and quarantined, but the
> > Subject
> > line is not re-written.
> >
> > I'd like the subject line to say "SPAM!" + the old subject line
> >
The idea behind not changing the subject line of quarantined mail
On 2/1/09 8:24 AM, Casey Bralla wrote:
> Problem Summary: Spam is properly identified and quarantined, but the Subject
> line is not re-written.
>
> I'd like the subject line to say "SPAM!" + the old subject line
>
See:
"No spam-related headers inserted?", and
"How to add the spam tags to al
Problem Summary: Spam is properly identified and quarantined, but the Subject
line is not re-written.
I'd like the subject line to say "SPAM!" + the old subject line
I'm new to Amavis, but experienced in Spamassassin & Postfix. I recently
rebuild my Debian "etch" (stable) eMail server an
Dave McGuire wrote:
>I've recently experienced a massive increase in spam, much of
> which is getting through my filters. I was wondering if there's a
> mailing list on which things like this are discussed...what people
> are seeing, what SA rulesets are effective (SARE rules, etc) and
Hey folks, I hope everyone here is having a good holiday season.
I've recently experienced a massive increase in spam, much of
which is getting through my filters. I was wondering if there's a
mailing list on which things like this are discussed...what people
are seeing, what SA rule
Mark Martinec schrieb:
> My first guess is that recipient is not considered local.
> If that is not the case, some logging would be helpful.
>
-_- Ah stupid me.
I was so sure its in the list because its generated automatically by a
script.
@local_domains_maps = ( read_hash("$MYHOME/local_doma
Karsten,
> Nov 18 13:36:22 mail01 amavis[15852]: (15852-11) Passed SPAMMY,
> [80.67.18.000] [89.101.56.41] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ->
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, mail_id:
> r6afH9rLp+KS, Hits: 8.349, size: 1760, queued_as: 4021F950009, 1589 ms
>
> Its obviously found spam
Dear list,
I get spam like this
mail01:/var/log# grep pasovarsky_aemxyz syslog.0
Nov 18 13:36:20 mail01 postfix/qmgr[27109]: A5320950006:
from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=1760, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Nov 18 13:36:20 mail01 amavis[15852]: (15852-11) ESMTP::10024
/var/lib/amavis/tmp/amavis-20
Juan,
> This morning 2 identical ALLCAPS spam squeaked in to my inbox. There
> was a .doc attached. What setting influences whether a message is
> scanned or not? Does it reside on the amavisd-new side or on the
> spamassassin side?
On the amavisd side two settings control whether a message ge
This morning 2 identical ALLCAPS spam squeaked in to my inbox. There
was a .doc attached. What setting influences whether a message is
scanned or not? Does it reside on the amavisd-new side or on the
spamassassin side?
Thank you for any pointers,
/juan
TECTED] Im Auftrag von Olivier
Nicole
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. März 2008 06:18
An: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: [AMaViS-user] Spam not quarantined
Hi,
I am new to amavisd-new and I am trying to understand why spam above
kill level would not get quarantined.
I check that the configuratio
Hi
It's possible to put spam in quarantine.
For example I use mysql base for spam quarantine with Mailzu
(http://www.mailzu.net/)
In /etc/amavisd.conf
$spam_quarantine_method = 'sql:';
@lookup_sql_dsn =
( ['DBI:mysql:database=mail;host=localhost;port=3306', 'user',
'password'] );
@storag
Hi,
I am new to amavisd-new and I am trying to understand why spam above
kill level would not get quarantined.
I check that the configuration for spam and visur is very similar,
virus get quarantines, but not spam.
Any idea of the direction I should look at?
TIA,
Olivier
-
Mike Cisar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Running Sendmail/Amavis/Spamassassin/Dovecot on a couple of servers. About
> 50% of the users prefer to be spoon-fed their SPAM in their inbox, for the
> other 50% or so we've set up to sort their SPAM into an IMAP spam folder
> using plussed addressing.
>
> A numbe
Hi all,
Running Sendmail/Amavis/Spamassassin/Dovecot on a couple of servers. About
50% of the users prefer to be spoon-fed their SPAM in their inbox, for the
other 50% or so we've set up to sort their SPAM into an IMAP spam folder
using plussed addressing.
A number of users still use POP to acce
> I have nearly static flat user address file to validate recipient
address
> on Postfix.
It's very easy to write a script that will download your user list from
Notes LDAP directory and create the postfix hash.
Michael D. Lemon
Director of Information Technology
Americal Corporation
Phone: 25
BOn Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Vincent Li wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Javier wrote:
>
>> thank you all for your kind answers...
>>
>> i understand the solution is a non-lotus smtp server to process the
>> mail routing...
>>
>> but i have another question regarding your sugestions...
>>
>> can i perhaps..
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Javier wrote:
> thank you all for your kind answers...
>
> i understand the solution is a non-lotus smtp server to process the
> mail routing...
>
> but i have another question regarding your sugestions...
>
> can i perhaps have a smtp (postfix) in front of my lotus smtp?
On 9/27/07, Hans Moser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gary V schrieb:
>
> > Quarantine is triggered by kill_level. If you want to quarantine at
> > 19, you could set: $sa_kill_level_deflt = 19;
> Ok.
> > $sa_quarantine_cutoff_level is used to delete high scoring spam that
> > is bound for the quara
Gary V schrieb:
> Quarantine is triggered by kill_level. If you want to quarantine at
> 19, you could set: $sa_kill_level_deflt = 19;
Ok.
> $sa_quarantine_cutoff_level is used to delete high scoring spam that
> is bound for the quarantine. If you wanted to review all the
> quarantined spam, yo
On 9/27/07, Mark Martinec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Amavisd-new does reach into your mailbox and delete messages after
> > some time has passed.
>
> does -> does not
Indeed, editing error.
--
Gary V
-
This SF.net email
> Amavisd-new does reach into your mailbox and delete messages after
> some time has passed.
does -> does not
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atd
On 9/25/07, Hans Moser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This is version 2.4.5. I want to quarantine Spam above a score of (here)
> 19 in a remote mailbox.
Quarantine is triggered by kill_level. If you want to quarantine at
19, you could set:
$sa_kill_level_deflt = 19;
$sa_quarantine_cutoff_le
Hi!
This is version 2.4.5. I want to quarantine Spam above a score of (here)
19 in a remote mailbox. (Later I want it to be deleted.)
But amavis does not want me to. :(
$sa_quarantine_cutoff_level = 19;
$spam_quarantine_method ='smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10025';
$spam_quarantine_to = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
I would guess that it is matching another record in your users table
in the database. Perhaps a default user with higher priority?
You can edit amavisd.conf and set log_level to 5, and paste the
results of the transaction that goes through. It will probably show
exactly what's happening and w
Greetings,
I am running amavisd-new-2.4.4 (20061120). If I need to upgrade I
will.
I am using a mysql database with my users to do per-user/per-domain
configurations. My MTA is postfix.
In the policy I am using I have no quarantine defined for spam. I have
a tag_level, a tag2_level, and kill_lev
Mark Martinec wrote:
> Jordi,
>
>> My amavisd-new+spamasssassin runs well. At present, when SPAM mail is
>> detected by SA, it is sended to my $MYHOME/$QUARANTINEDIR
>> (/var/amavis/quarantine in my system). Currenly I use Postix with
>> virtuals domains/users (with MySQL backend) and Dovecot as P
Jordi,
> My amavisd-new+spamasssassin runs well. At present, when SPAM mail is
> detected by SA, it is sended to my $MYHOME/$QUARANTINEDIR
> (/var/amavis/quarantine in my system). Currenly I use Postix with
> virtuals domains/users (with MySQL backend) and Dovecot as POP/IMAP server.
> My last go
Jordi wrote:
> Hi,
> My amavisd-new+spamasssassin runs well. At present, when SPAM mail is
> detected by SA, it is sended to my $MYHOME/$QUARANTINEDIR
> (/var/amavis/quarantine in my system). Currenly I use Postix with
> virtuals domains/users (with MySQL backend) and Dovecot as POP/IMAP serve
Hi,
My amavisd-new+spamasssassin runs well. At present, when SPAM mail is
detected by SA, it is sended to my $MYHOME/$QUARANTINEDIR
(/var/amavis/quarantine in my system). Currenly I use Postix with
virtuals domains/users (with MySQL backend) and Dovecot as POP/IMAP server.
The mailboxes dir (us
I've been using the SARE rulesets, and gocr to catch more spam.
Haven't got the URL's handy right now, but you should be able to find them
with google.
HTH
.peter
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Iván Chavero wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been using amavisd-new with spamassassin for quite a while now, i
>
Hello,
I've been using amavisd-new with spamassassin for quite a while now, i
want to know if there are other spam filters that i could add to
amavisd-new to complement the work that SA does or if there are any
resources where i can find ways to optimize the SA filtering.
Thanks
-
Azfar Hashmi wrote:
> when ever I test ms outlook connection settings amavisd-new consider it spam
> any idea how to fix it.
>
how can we tell without the full headers?
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Downl
when ever I test ms outlook connection settings amavisd-new consider it spam
any idea how to fix it.
Samople.
Subject: ***SPAM***Microsoft Office Outlook Test Message
This is an e-mail message sent automatically by Microsoft
Office Outlook's
Account Manager while testing the settings for your PO
Jeff wrote:
> When I read into:
> @bypass_virus_checks_maps = (\%bypass_virus_checks, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> \$bypass_virus_checks_re);
> @bypass_spam_checks_maps = (\%bypass_spam_checks, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> \$bypass_spam_checks_re);
> I understood these to behave opposite. ie. they 'bypassed
When I read into:
@bypass_virus_checks_maps = (\%bypass_virus_checks, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
\$bypass_virus_checks_re);
@bypass_spam_checks_maps = (\%bypass_spam_checks, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
\$bypass_spam_checks_re);
I understood these to behave opposite. ie. they 'bypassed' spam and virus
checks
Jeff wrote:
> Recently someone had difficulties getting spam headers into emails, and that
> issue turned out to be related to lookups. I don't think that's my problem
> though.
> I have a clean up-to-date install of debian. I have postfix and Amavis
> running fine. I've done some searchi
Jeff,
> Recently someone had difficulties getting spam headers into emails, and
> that issue turned out to be related to lookups. I don't think that's my
> problem though.
>
> I have a clean up-to-date install of debian.
Which version of amavisd-new is that?
> Any suggestions why my spam header
Recently someone had difficulties getting spam headers into emails, and that
issue turned out to be related to lookups. I don't think that's my problem
though.
I have a clean up-to-date install of debian. I have postfix and Amavis running
fine. I've done some searching and read a lot, and
Wilson wrote:
> I can discard the spam mail, but cannot mark SPAM header to the spam mail,
> the following is some information what i tried for test.
> $sa_tag_level_deflt = -; # add spam info headers if at, or above that
> level
> $sa_tag2_level_deflt = 1.0; # add 'spam detected' headers at
Wilson Kwok schrieb:
> I can discard the spam mail, but cannot mark SPAM header to the spam mail,
> the following is some information what i tried for test.
Do you think starting new threads will solve your problem,
did you ever read the answers in the other threads?
[...]
--
Grüsse/Greetings
M
I can discard the spam mail, but cannot mark SPAM header to the spam mail,
the following is some information what i tried for test.
$sa_tag_level_deflt = -; # add spam info headers if at, or above that level
$sa_tag2_level_deflt = 1.0; # add 'spam detected' headers at that level
$sa_kill_level
Robert wrote:
> Still haven't been able to get multiple select domains to tag the
> subject line. Here is all my related settings, can someone suggest why I
> cannot get subject line tagging for example.com and example2.com? Do I
> have my arrays setup correctly?
> @local_domains_maps = ( [".$
Robert,
> Still haven't been able to get multiple select domains to tag the
> subject line. Here is all my related settings, can someone suggest why I
> cannot get subject line tagging for example.com and example2.com? Do I
> have my arrays setup correctly?
>
> @local_domains_maps = ( [".$mydomain
> > @local_domains_maps = ( [".$mydomain", ".example.com", ".example2.com"])
>
> I think you've got it set for ".example.com", which will not match
> "example.com". Try removing the leading dots.
No, no, the .example.com _does_ include example.com, along with its
subdomains. See README.lookup
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 03:17:49PM -0400, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> Still haven't been able to get multiple select domains to tag the
> subject line. Here is all my related settings, can someone suggest why I
> cannot get subject line tagging for example.com and example2.com? Do I
> have my ar
Still haven't been able to get multiple select domains to tag the
subject line. Here is all my related settings, can someone suggest why I
cannot get subject line tagging for example.com and example2.com? Do I
have my arrays setup correctly?
@local_domains_maps = ( [".$mydomain", ".example.com"
Vincent,
> Is there anyway for amavisd to avoid the file-4.20 bug before someone use
> this as DOS attack?
I don't think there is, all mail parts are submitted to file(1) for
assessment. The best path is to get file(1) fixed as soon as possible.
Better a DOS than a free shell (nonprivileged) on
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007, Vincent Li wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2007, Sven Schuster wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Henrik,
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 08:43:23PM +0300, Henrik Krohns told us:
Must be something else in that file, 2.7M LFs alone in a file
makes no difference to file-4.20 here. Can you provide
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Mark Martinec wrote:
> I decided to give it a try with SA 3.2.0-pre2 to see how
> it cooperates with amavisd-new. Not much trouble there,
> even plugins like FuzzyOcr, Botnet, ImageCheck and ImageInfo
> seem to still work, along with SQL-based bayes and AWL.
>
> One thing I not
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Claude Frantz wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
>
>> I have made SpamAssassin plugin to query a local stream socket when run
>> p0f with -Q option.
>>
>> The limitation is that SA and Amavisd-new has to
>> run on MX server because the socket can only lis
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Vincent Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: martedì 6 marzo 2007 19.22
A: Giampaolo Tomassoni
Cc: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Oggetto: RE: [AMaViS-user] Why p0f-analyzer.pl?
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Giampaolo T
Philippe,
> how can i tell amavis to move spam to a specific folder on the imap server?
> is that possible? what do i have to do?
> this should be a per-recipient setting. in horde sam there is a Spam Folder
> text field mapped to the column addr_extension_spam in the policy table.
> does it mean
Freitag, 23. Februar 2007 13:48
>> To: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] spam mail not marked in subject
>>
>>
>> Philippe,
>>
>>> in the README.sql i saw following lines:
>>> spam_subject_tagvarchar(64) default
Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] spam mail not marked in subject
>
>
> Philippe,
>
> > in the README.sql i saw following lines:
> > spam_subject_tagvarchar(64) default NULL,
> > spam_subject_tag2 varchar(64) default NULL,
> >
> > i expect that these
Philippe,
> in the README.sql i saw following lines:
> spam_subject_tagvarchar(64) default NULL,
> spam_subject_tag2 varchar(64) default NULL,
>
> i expect that these lines are for subject rewriting.
> what is the second column spam_subject_tag2 for?
subject_tag is a text inserted into Subj
3. Februar 2007 10:58
> To: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [AMaViS-user] spam mail not marked in subject
>
>
> hi,
> i´m using per-recipient white- and blacklists but blacklisted mails aren´t
> marked as spam (like in amavisd-new maia). they are recognized as
hi,
i´m using per-recipient white- and blacklists but blacklisted mails aren´t
marked as spam (like in amavisd-new maia). they are recognized as
blacklisted but not marked in the subject.
in my amavisd.conf i have the following settings:
$mydomain = 'localhost';
$sql_select_policy = 'SELECT *
Roy,
> I just recently installed mitea maildefender spam filter which using
> amavis for its spam/virus filter.
Which version of amavisd-new ?
> After testing several times with both
> ham and spam emails, I noticed that amavis doesn't rewritten the subject
> line like it supposed to with spam
Hello,
First of all, I would like to apologize for bringing up which probably
to some of you an old issue.
I just recently installed mitea maildefender spam filter which using
amavis for its spam/virus filter. After testing several times with both
ham and spam emails, I noticed that amavis doesn'
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Mark Martinec wrote:
>
> That's one way of saying it, but is conceptually wrong.
>
> It is better to think that SA (even when called by amavisd)
> does see and observe all settings in *.cf files and rules,
> it's just that amavisd does not ask SA to rewrite/modify
> a message,
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Jeff Thurston wrote:
> This may not be the entirely correct place to ask this, but since I am using
> Amavis-new to control Spamassassin I figured I would start here.
>
> As far as the SA utilities are concerned, is there any difference between
> amavis-new+SA, or SA as a stan
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
> Why does the p0f-analyzer.pl script exists?
>
> I see that the p0f tool is capable of caching a specified amount of request,
> and then reply to queries issues through a unix socket.
>
> This in native C-language, which often means reduced size an
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Mark Martinec wrote:
> myself writes:
>> which may pose a small risk of DoS. Such attack is only
>> possible from within your own networks, as a firewall or
>> a router should already be discarding packets with your
>> own network address coming from outside.
>
> Actually I'll
Vincent,
> > If using p0f-analyzer, please switch soon to a version of
> > p0f-analyzer.pl as supplied with 2.4.5-pre2 (or later).
> > It fixes an endless-loop in p0f-analyzer.pl which happens
> > if a p0f daemon crashes (piped to stdin of p0f-analyzer)
> > or is manually terminated without also t
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Mark Martinec wrote:
> A pre-release of amavisd-new-2.4.5 is available at:
>
> http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/amavisd-new-2.4.5-pre2.tar.gz
>
> The 2.4.5 is primarily a maintenance release, fixing known
> bugs and deficiencies of 2.4.4. It is expected to be the last
> rel
Heute (29.12.2006/17:34 Uhr) schrieb Gary V,
> mouss wrote:
>> Ed Lucero wrote:
>>> How can I send spam to a dedicated spam respository server.
>>>
>>> I know I can send all spam to a single address by setting
>>> spam_quarantine_to to [EMAIL PROTECTED] But I want to maintain the recipient
>>> ad
mouss wrote:
> Ed Lucero wrote:
>> How can I send spam to a dedicated spam respository server.
>>
>> I know I can send all spam to a single address by setting
>> spam_quarantine_to to [EMAIL PROTECTED] But I want to maintain the recipient
>> address when it gets sent, so the receiving MTA can plac
1 - 100 of 284 matches
Mail list logo
