On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 08:29:24 +0200, Sabine Jordan wrote:
> Is there anyone who has an answer to my question?
have you just tried doing a Playback without answering the call or doing a
Progress () ?
--
Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven."
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 03:04:50 -0400, Michael Jerris wrote:
> There already is, its called sofia-sip and it is sponsored/written by
> nokia. It already runs on their tablets and has been recently re-
> ported to symbian.
but that's a sip toolkit, a library from which a client must be built.
"So
On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:54:13 -0700, Rehan Allah Wala wrote:
> So having said that, are we going to see a asterisk running on symbian
> very soon ?
>
> http://www.symbianfoundation.org/
wouldn't it be better to have an open source sip client running on symbian
instead of asterisk as it is ? as i u
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:43:37 +0200, Tim Koehler wrote:
> Hi Danny,
>
>
> did you have a look on our snom370? We managed to integrate a VPN-Client
> in the phone. With a VPN Server on or before your Asterisk box you could
> run a secure and "unblocked" communication between phones and PBX.
>
> M
On 12/22/06 06:07 Matt Dunkin said the following:
I think one of the first people to respond hit this right on the head...
Asterisk is GPL and you cannot copyright something that is GPL however
proprietary license or GPL, the copyright for Asterisk belongs to Digium. i
think the user's ques
On 09/14/06 21:44 trixter aka Bret McDanel said the following:
On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 09:26 -0400, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
A wifi phone with bluetooth and a sane set of ringers and soft button control
would be the cat's ass. So far there is no such thing, though. :-(
Gotta be careful, blu
On 09/14/06 21:44 trixter aka Bret McDanel said the following:
that with a 802.11b/g device which uses the same set of spectrum, given
how close the BT and wifi antennas would be to each other would cause a
dramatic reduction in range from the AP due to desensitizing the
antennas of the other r
On 09/07/06 07:31 Matthew Rubenstein said the following:
The article doesn't state whether the Nokia phones can "roam" beteen
2G/3G and WiFi without dropping the call.
as of now, they can't.
--
Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven."
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 09/07/06 07:31 James Jones said the following:
I going am drop the subject for now, but for Digium to censor news makes
me very worried. The mailing list where modified yesterday. It seem that
more investors you guys take on the more you guys those sight of what
it's not about censoring
On 07/30/06 04:10 Trixter AKA Bret McDanel said the following:
So does Digium really want to say that if you take the GPL version of
asterisk you must go through and rename all references to iax, dundi,
digium and asterisk if you modifiy anything (or just add modules that
arent distributed with
On 06/23/06 15:45 Kevin P. Fleming said the following:
Digium has already announced the TC400B, which is a PCI low-profile card
capable of doing more than 100 (the final number has not been determined
yet) G.729A and/or G.723.1 transcodes. This product is currently
entering beta testing and wil
On 03/30/06 15:59 Michael Procter said the following:
If you are replacing a legacy PBX, then you can save yourself lots
of work by using Citel SIP Handset Gateways to connect your legacy
what's your pricing like, michael ?
--
Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven.
On 03/23/06 10:04 Steven Sokol said the following:
astgroups wrote:
Just an observation but I suspect you are going to have participation
issues, especially at the Berlin venue. Astricon will be held at the
height of the World Cup which is being hosted in Germany no less during
with the Cup)
On 02/05/06 15:39 trixter aka Bret McDanel said the following:
On Sun, 2006-02-05 at 14:35 +0800, Dinesh Nair wrote:
if it's a binary only distribution, could we please, please ask for freebsd
binaries as well ?
The license servers are freebsd so odds are that will happen :)
most
On 02/05/06 18:42 Jean-Michel Hiver said the following:
NB: Personally, I find all these channel limitations (Digium or yours)
and the whole g.729 licensing scheme pretty ridiculous...
we should be blaming software patents for this, and not digium or anyone
else who implements them.
--
Rega
On 02/05/06 09:47 trixter aka Bret McDanel said the following:
Hopefully within a week, we are doing performance testing now to ensure
that it doesnt fail, under this model if the license server fails for
any reason no one can aquire a license which is generally a bad thing.
if it's a binar
On 01/21/06 02:02 Zoa said the following:
]
Hey ho,
A few days ago we released the linux version of the phone, today we are
very happy to have the mac version ready for a little field test.
Freely downloadable from http://www.asteriskguru.com/tools/idefisk_mac.php
is there any chance of a
On 12/07/05 09:38 David Liu said the following:
They are now re-advertising themselves again on the Wiki and presenting
themselves as digiumchina.com. So I'd like the community to be aware of
whatever the reality in your interaction with them, i believe that digium
inc will have something
On 11/23/05 14:10 Shamsul Arefin said the following:
We are doing around 1500 sip registrations without any problems with
Asterisk so far.
which begs the question, what are the hardware specs for this box ?
--
Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven."
[EMAIL PROTECT
On 11/08/05 03:46 David Aldworth said the following:
6) No monthly fees: straight per-minute, preferably with 6/6 billing.
On Pay-as-You-Go termination Teliax has no monthly fee's. Local numbers and
toll-free numbers are $4.99/mth on pay as you go. We also have a variety of
wholesale, resell
On 10/13/05 10:40 Cory Andrews said the following:
Netgear WGR826V Wireless 802.11G Router, Dual FXS w/ 4 Ethernet Ports
-Similar to the Linksys WRT54GP2-NA, unlocked unit, but this one has
Wireless G
Product Link: http://www.voipsupply.com/product_info.php?products_id=1058
it currently say
On 10/12/05 13:59 trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com said the following:
quality, why many people say VoIP isnt ready for primetime all the while
not knowing that they prolly have talked on a VoIP call and not known
it.
ain't that the truth !
a local malaysian mobile operator has a service cal
On 10/12/05 13:00 trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com said the following:
Where I got the data from and all is also on that page if anyone wanted
to make their own lists. I would appreciate any updates or corrections
that anyone happens to notice.
a simple modification which would make this a
On 10/11/05 14:29 Dinesh Nair said the following:
will not be able to be done if the source is modified, it kinda limits
significant modifications to the source when openh323 is not used. o
oops, that came out wrong. i meant it ALLOWS significant modifications to
the source ONLY when
On 10/11/05 14:08 Kevin P. Fleming said the following:
protect (as you already pointed out in another response) our trademark
and the license exceptions associated with it.
i can fully understand the need to protect the trademark, and this will go
a long way towards assuaging concerns about m
On 10/11/05 14:15 trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com said the following:
On a side note but vaguely related to this (licensing in general) does
digium charge EU patrons for the g.729 codec? I understand that digium
is in the US and that it can cause them problems if they dont charge,
there may
On 10/11/05 12:37 trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com said the following:
Ahh I see what you mean, instead of asterisk business edition and just
asterisk use two totally seperate names. That could cause more
confusion than its worth, and cause potential trademark dissolution
actually, it's been
On 10/11/05 00:42 Paul said the following:
consider allowing a name like openasterisk or asteriskorg to be used
freely in order to preserve rights for Asterisk(tm)?
that's exactly what i suggested, to use a different brand/name for the open
source version.
--
Regards,
On 10/10/05 23:21 Cory Andrews said the following:
Patrick - a few product images are available on our product page here ->
http://www.voipsupply.com/product_info.php?products_id=1057
uggh, no passthru ethernet port. you dont really want to tell a senior
executive that you'd be rewiring his
On 10/10/05 01:17 Reid Forrest said the following:
developing, funding, and releasing Asterisk. I think they deserve to profit
from their work, and I will support them. If some on this list don't agree
as do many, through the purchase of TDM/TE4XXP cards. in reality, i think
we're still a lon
On 10/09/05 21:54 Matt Riddell said the following:
an unbelievable day filled with people doing things in business that you just
wouldn't do in a group of friends.
and that's the crux. it really shouldnt have had to come to this, with
differences ironed out over a discussion, private or publi
On 10/09/05 21:22 Paul said the following:
2) Somebody uses open source as part of a custom solution without the
consent of the customer. If it turns out the customer had plans to sell
business franchises or even sell the software to competitors the courts
have good reason to get involved. I pi
On 10/09/05 23:51 Jeremy McNamara said the following:
RIGHT ON! None of these bastards would have the power of Asterisk to
fork if Digium hadn't gave it to the world in the first place.
My Loyalties are to Mark and Digium all the way.
let's not turn it into a "Us vs Them" type of thing. man
On 10/09/05 07:40 Bruce Ferrell said the following:
Dinesh Nair wrote:
-- >8 snippage 8< --
perhaps a rewrite of a GPLed H.323 stack is in order, then this whole
thing will go away.
That would be a not very fun thing to do... First you have to do a
i'm sure it
On 10/09/05 06:41 Kevin P. Fleming said the following:
I think we're missing a major point here: the use of the trademark
applies to the source code, not the binaries you make from it. I don't
absolutely, i was never confused about this.
We are talking only about distributing substantively m
On 10/09/05 05:56 Kevin P. Fleming said the following:
the trademark. This would not allow (for example) bundling in major
changes such as 'bristuff', but would allow for file locations to be
changed, permissions modification, that sort of thing, designed for
compatibility with the platform it
On 10/09/05 05:44 Kevin P. Fleming said the following:
There is no 'legality', there is only license conformance or
non-conformance. Non-conformance to the license exposes you to action
apologies for using the wrong terminology.
All of this is only relevant (as another poster has posted) to
On 10/09/05 05:45 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said the following:
Why not to stop trying to find ways around GPL, and instead, write
something useful that would respect the rights of Digium and other
contributors?
many are not trying to find ways around the GPL but rather to clarify their
usage/distrib
On 10/09/05 05:37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said the following:
It is *legal*, but unless it has been "blessed" by Digium, you cannot
*redistribute* the binaries that may be linked with OpenH323/OpenSSL or
any other GPL-incompatible software.
which is exactly the sort of clarification we need from d
On 10/09/05 04:59 Paul said the following:
I am running 3 types of asterisk on test sytems. I have it locally
compiled. I have it installed from official debian packages. I have it
installed from xorcom.com debian packages. All 3 are modifications to
exactly. asterisk is in the freebsd ports
On 10/09/05 04:49 Kevin P. Fleming said the following:
An original Asterisk distribution plus patches is still called Asterisk,
since it is the source code that was distributed by the owner of the
Asterisk trademark.
ok, this clears freebsd's asterisk port then, since in that mechanism the
o
On 10/09/05 04:07 Jeremy McNamara said the following:
It very clearly states in the README in the Asterisk source TLD:
Specific permission is also granted to OpenSSL and OpenH323 to link
with Asterisk.
LINK WITH ASTERISK - A fork is not asterisk.
i'm failing to understand this. person A
On 10/09/05 03:52 Jeremy McNamara said the following:
That shows how totally ignorant you are. Open H.323, OpenSSL and G.729
are not compatible with the GPL. It has nothing to with who owns what.
so the glue bits in channels/chan_h323.c and channels/h323 are GPLed and
are dynamically linke
On 10/05/05 18:30 Matt Riddell said the following:
Shamsul Arefin wrote:
Hi we are looking for co-location in malysia . any one can assit
Yes, contact me offlist. You're probably looking at NTT or Malaysian Telecom
- pros and cons to both.
another good bet would be AIMS (http://www.aims
44 matches
Mail list logo
