I DL'd some of the 'trial' product as ALAC and some of it wouldn't play
in SC until I 're-converted' it to ALAC again. Something strange in
their file headers, me thinks.
Tagging is also why I decided to do ALAC instead of FLAC. Fixing
everything in iTunes is how I prefer to handle it. Of
Eric Seaberg;324687 Wrote:
http://www.shedworking.co.uk/2007/11/peter-gabriel-shed-of-your-dreams.html
Hey Eric, while you're there, could you tell Peter to tell BW to learn
to tag? The first one had at least Album and artist tags, the rest had
no tags. Then they went from .jpg to pdf for
Hi Eric, I'm giving the three month trial a go - if it's up to scratch
it could save me a lot of money on CD's - what is your connection with
Pete Gabriel ?
--
pkfox
When the going gets weird - the weird turn pro. Hunter S Thompson
Hi Eric,
I got the full tour of Gabriel's studio a few years back. It's by no
means a home studio. There are a number of different recording areas,
each with it's own unique sound and space. The studio manager is also
hifi friendly, and they have paid a lot of attention to various things,
such
Peter had finished a 'loft', of sorts, off of his home... I should've
specified it wasn't the main studio. The plans have been made
available and, actually, the whole 25'x25' building was being given
away loaded with gear and instruments as part of a promotion at last
October's AES convention in
If I remember rightly, the 'shed' is in the grounds of the studio. Hope
you enjoy your trip Eric.
--
bigfool1956
David Ayers
Music is what counts, hifi just helps us enjoy it more
bigfool1956's Profile:
http://www.shedworking.co.uk/2007/11/peter-gabriel-shed-of-your-dreams.html
--
Eric Seaberg
Eric Seaberg - San Diego
A.E.S., S.M.P.T.E., S.P.A.R.S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eric Seaberg's Profile:
Hi All, got this link today from The Telegraph
http://www.bowers-wilkins.co.uk, it's got something to do with Peter
Gabriel's studio - just go look...
--
pkfox
When the going gets weird - the weird turn pro. Hunter S Thompson
The link has been changed. I'm actually going to the UK early September
to confirm testing of our new remote audio console (the one in my pic to
the left). Peter Gabriel owns the company (Solid State Logic) and I'm
planning on spending some time with him at dinner one evening while I'm
there.
david_a_woodward;316973 Wrote:
Hi there, I hope someone can help, Ive read a fair few posts, but as is
often the way cant find the info I am looking for.
I am new to ripping, I have a collection of about 500 CDs and I am on
the brink of lashing out some hard earned cash on
Wow, thanks for all the help, very active forum!! thought a question
about iTunes v open standards might provoke some debate! I have
downloaded dbpoweramp and am very impressed, seen enough to decide this
is the way to go, and rip to FLAC and also MP3 for iPod. Just need to
figure out how I get
Phil Leigh;317064 Wrote:
There are some discs with flawed copy protection schemas that need many
many sector re-reads to get the data off acurately...
For example, I have The Beatles Let it Be Naked that takes 2 hours to
rip with EAC and the disc is in physically mint condition!
Well I did
david_a_woodward;317191 Wrote:
Wow, thanks for all the help, very active forum!! thought a question
about iTunes v open standards might provoke some debate!
Ah now see you posted in the Audiophile forums. If you wanted some
debate you should ask if a $10,000 power cord for your
darrenyeats;317288 Wrote:
Well I did say IME. :)
Perhaps I'm spoiled with cdparanoia on Linux...the following sums up my
view. http://folk.uio.no/hpv/linuxtoons/dilbert-unix.png
Darren
That made me laugh - thanks Darren!
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets
sc53;317065 Wrote:
But if it takes 20 mins per disc (Apple Lossless takes about 5 mins per
disk) or requires tons of initial setup etc. I'd use iTunes and not
worry about that one track out of thousands that may contain an audible
error.
There are two separate processes here - ripping and
I'm not sure I follow the reasoning here.
If iTunes and other less secure rippers popular with the general public
do not get hung up on such purposeful errors - where is the deterrent
value in their inclusion? Or are the record companies trying to deter
the admittedly small percentage of
esbrewer;317310 Wrote:
I'm not sure I follow the reasoning here.
If iTunes and other less secure rippers popular with the general public
do not get hung up on such purposeful errors - where is the deterrent
value in their inclusion?
Well, record companies aren't the sharpest knives in
esbrewer;317310 Wrote:
I'm not sure I follow the reasoning here.
If iTunes and other less secure rippers popular with the general public
do not get hung up on such purposeful errors - where is the deterrent
value in their inclusion? Or are the record companies trying to deter
the
m1abrams;317316 Wrote:
Well I not sure about insecure rippers handling those CDs well. I have
a CD that has this attempt at DRM in place and I did rip it with iTunes
and it ripped very quickly however when I played it back it was full of
pops and clicks. Ran it through EAC and it took
m1abrams;317316 Wrote:
Well I not sure about insecure rippers handling those CDs well. I have
a CD that has this attempt at DRM in place and I did rip it with iTunes
and it ripped very quickly however when I played it back it was full of
pops and clicks. Ran it through EAC and it took
Hi there, I hope someone can help, Ive read a fair few posts, but as is
often the way cant find the info I am looking for.
I am new to ripping, I have a collection of about 500 CDs and I am on
the brink of lashing out some hard earned cash on SB3/Duet/Transporter
(3 rooms) and TranquilPC
My opinion:
1) If you're not 100% tied to iTunes, use FLAC.
2) If you're serious about sound quality, don't use iTunes for
ripping.
I use dbpoweramp to rip to FLAC for the main library, then the flac2mp3
script to create a low bitrate mp3 copy of everything which is seen by
iTunes for loading
Here's a similar discussion:
http://www.avforums.com/forums/showthread.php?p=6493742
--
alekz
alekz's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13574
View this thread:
radish;316977 Wrote:
2) If you're serious about sound quality, don't use iTunes for
ripping.
That's an interesting comment.
Surely if any other ripping tool were being used it would be using the
same drive and unless the CD were damaged, there would be very little
error concealment
I use Dbpoweramp to rip to ALAC, I use iTunes to manage the music.
Dbpoweramp will allow you to rip to either Flac or ALAC. DBpoweramp is
a much better ripper than iTunes it has both secure, ultra secure and
accuraterip checking, iTunes has none of these important ripping tools.
As far as sound
dbpoweramp is probably the best bet for ripping right now.
I have not seen a program that does better for metadata than dbpoweramp
including getting coverart. And for secure ripping it does a great job.
For your needs I would recommend the reference version.
I wish I had dbpoweramp when I
Forgot to add you can use the Squeezebox controller to control ANY
Squeezebox device including the transporter. This even includes the
original Slimp3. Heck you can use it to control Softsqueeze.
The controller actually does not control the players them self directly
it tells the server to
CardinalFang;316984 Wrote:
That's an interesting comment.
Surely if any other ripping tool were being used it would be using the
same drive and unless the CD were damaged, there would be very little
error concealment going on, only error correction, which by definition
fixes up any read
CardinalFang;316994 Wrote:
But it's only an issue if error correction isn't sufficient. Most CDs
require error correction, which iTunes handles, very few require
concealment or multiple reads to get the data.
If error correction is working, then there should be no difference
between
m1abrams;317006 Wrote:
No see that is what you are missing Redbook audio really does not have
any way to handle error corrections. When audio CDs came out
technology did not exist that could handle and correct errors fast
enough for streamed audio. So the thought was if a read error occurs
I see errors that need dbpoweramps's special touch frequently, even on
brand new CDs. If I were using iTunes (or any other non-secure ripper)
I wouldn't even know there was an issue until/unless I actually heard
it.
My wife ripped a bunch of CDs with iTunes before we met and I'm now
going back
m1abrams;317006 Wrote:
No see that is what you are missing Redbook audio really does not have
any way to handle error corrections. When audio CDs came out
technology did not exist that could handle and correct errors fast
enough for streamed audio. So the thought was if a read error occurs
Eric Seaberg;317024 Wrote:
That's not entirely true - the error correction happens in the CD PLAYER
during real-time playback. If there is a frame or two that are corrupt
(@ 75-frames per second) then the player interpolates its BEST GUESS of
what should fill the 'hole' based on what was
m1abrams;317006 Wrote:
No see that is what you are missing Redbook audio really does not have
any way to handle error corrections.
Nope, RedBook does indeed contain error correction.
This is from a HP CDROM technical paper, but there are plenty of other
references:
Because the CD-ROM disk
CardinalFang;317030 Wrote:
Nope, RedBook does indeed contain error correction - and iTunes has an
option to use it.
This is from a HP CDROM technical paper, but there are plenty of other
references:
Because the CD-ROM disk has a very high bit density, it has an
inherent error rate of
CardinalFang;317030 Wrote:
Nope, RedBook does indeed contain error correction
True, Redbook does contain a certain level of error correction. But if
you read through the specs further, this level was deemed
un-satisfactory for data CD's, where it's impossible to cover up errors
by
Whatever the failings of red book good rippers have it nailed. In short,
rubbish CD drives can get bit-perfect rips with cdparanoia or similar
rippers.
The drive offset has nothing to do with SQ at all. It might affect
micro-seconds in terms of when a track starts, I don't stress about it
darrenyeats;317047 Wrote:
EAC and the like might be useful if you've got somewhat scratched
discs.
This is what I do not get, why would you use any other ripper then?
Chances are everyone will come across a CD that needs the error
handling that EAC, cdparanoia and dbpoweramp provide.
darrenyeats;317047 Wrote:
Whatever the failings of red book good rippers have it nailed. In short,
rubbish CD drives can get bit-perfect rips with cdparanoia or similar
rippers.
The drive offset has nothing to do with SQ at all. It might affect
micro-seconds in terms of when a track
I'm a keen audiophile too and have owned lots of good equipment over
the years. I started ripping some of my CDs to iTunes about 6 yrs ago
when I got my first iPod. I've always used Apple Lossless even on my
iPods--I don't try to get my whole music collection on the thing, just
what I fancy at
m1abrams;317040 Wrote:
Bottom line is this, would you want to spend the time to rip 500 CDs and
possibly have errors in the data but really have no way to know until
you listen to each and every track. Or use a proper program and rip
500 CDs and know that you have no errors in the data.
It doesn't matter how good your stereo is - garbage in garbage out.
I find it astonishing that in the same forum as people talk about
things like SPDIF jitter and 24-bit digitial volume scaling as being
detrimental to sound quality that there's anyone who's unwilling to use
a good ripper.
Do
CardinalFang;317072 Wrote:
I'm a Mac user and I do run Parallels, so I could use these other
rippers, but to be honest I haven't found the need, because when I did
trial them they were painfully slow and gave no discernible
improvement.
The only reason I posted was because it was said
radish;317085 Wrote:
I find it astonishing that in the same forum as people talk about things
like SPDIF jitter and 24-bit digitial volume scaling as being
detrimental to sound quality that there's anyone who's unwilling to use
a good ripper.
I do use a good ripper - iTunes. I haven't read
CardinalFang;317087 Wrote:
From my standpoint I do use a good ripper - iTunes. I haven't read
anything that says it doesn't rip CDs well. So far it's all hearsay and
conjecture, no actual data to back it up.
I've been checking cds out of the library and ripping them with both
iTunes and EAC
Oh and back to the OP. Since you have 500 CDs and you want to simplify
the ripping process and make it faster. dbpoweramp supports batch
ripping using many different types of auto-loaders. While the
auto-loaders are not exactly cheap it would make fairly quick and
painless work of 500 CDs. I
m1abrams;317098 Wrote:
I am anal about my metatags however with dbpoweramps tagging system I
would actually trust it with batch ripping and getting the tags right.
I wouldn't and I'm not even remotely anal about tags. While dbPowerAmp
is absolutely brilliant and its multiple tagging sources
andynormancx;317104 Wrote:
I wouldn't and I'm not even remotely anal about tags. While dbPowerAmp
is absolutely brilliant and its multiple tagging sources are far more
reliable than anything else I have used, they do still need some manual
cleaning up on some discs.
well i have not used the
m1abrams;317112 Wrote:
well i have not used the batch ripper yet. however i think it will give
you a report to allow you to tweak the files afterwards. also have you
used the llatest ver. with the use of 4 datasources. it really does
well.
I haven't used the batch ripper either yet. Yes I
andynormancx;317094 Wrote:
Or even better, use the multi encoder functionality to do it all in one
go.
Very true, and a cool feature. If anyone cares, the reason I don't do
it this way is that I sometimes find myself editing tags post-rip
(correct a spelling error, normalize a genre,
andynormancx;317094 Wrote:
Or even better, use the multi encoder functionality to do it all in one
go. I have dbPowerAmp set up so that it rips flacs into one folder, hi
bit rate MP3s into another folder and low bit rate MP3s for my phone
into a third folder.
All completely automatic once
TwistedWave;313839 Wrote:
The native FLAC metadata are not transcoded, however. I understand this
is something most of you would be interested in, and I plan to make
this work for a future version.
Thomas --
This sure would be great if you can get this working. Can I add one
enhancement?
Hi,
I installed twistedflac and was amazed about this tricky piece of
software.
But importing the twistedflac-drive in iTunes they were completely
untagged, only the filename is shown.
The FLACs were all tagged by MediaMonkey.
What has gone wrong?
regards
Flax
--
flax
Not sure what went wrong. I have all of my tags but no artwork. I can
live with that.
--
kphinney
SB3 (x2) and Transporter
Rotel RCD-1070
CIAudio DVA-2 w/ VAC-1 PS
JoLida 102B
Omega Grand 6's
AKG K501
kphinney's
Thomas,
Thank you for the input and for joining this forum. I'm glad to
assist in any way possible. I will post one of my files to a web-share
site so you can download it and send you the link. (The file length of
all of my FLACs are to large to email.) Perhaps you could open a
thread on your
I was using the car analogy to illustrate a point that numbers do not
always prove that there is no difference , but as you say , if there is
a difference then your preferences are inviolate.
In audio , there is no universal truth, nothing is ever a straight wire
with gain and thus whatever is on
Rodney_Gold;312741 Wrote:
I was using the car analogy to illustrate a point that numbers do not
always prove that there is no difference , but as you say , if there is
a difference then your preferences are inviolate.
In audio , there is no universal truth, nothing is ever a straight wire
Rodney_Gold wrote:
... and even if you are talking digital , where the notion (wrongly)
is that the signal is 1's and 0's (its an analog sine wave) ...
Rodney,
Assuming you are talking about SPDIF here, the digital information is
actually transmitted using Biphase mark code. [1]
R.
[1]
Well it has to be something thats happening to the digital signal, tho
at what stage and what affects the signal is beyond me. I'm a natural
sceptic and not prone to snake oil stuff , butI have directly AB
compared various sources etc into my system , which is actually easy to
do , considering my
Well, I got my info from
http://www.epanorama.net/documents/audio/spdif.html
and to quote the passage
S/PDIF signals
The signal on the digital output of a CD-player looks like almost
perfect sine-wave, with an amplitude of 500 mVtt and a frequency of
almost 3 MHz.
--
Rodney_Gold
Sb3/Z-sys
Rodney_Gold;312787 Wrote:
Well it has to be something thats happening to the digital signal, tho
at what stage and what affects the signal is beyond me. I'm a natural
sceptic and not prone to snake oil stuff , butI have directly AB
compared various sources etc into my system , which is
Kjg, I just tried your suggestion and can clearly hear a difference ,
especially in the bass. didn't think it would affect things in the
digital domain , but it doesBass inst as thin..Switched
back to the old system to see if I was perhaps imagining it , but no ,
def an increase in
Rodney_Gold;312494 Wrote:
Kjg, I just tried your suggestion and can clearly hear a difference ,
especially in the bass. didn't think it would affect things in the
digital domain , but it doesBass inst as thin..Switched
back to the old system to see if I was perhaps imagining it ,
As far as I can make out , Im now doing the decoding on ther server
rather than the TP, dunno why it makes a difference , perhaps cos im
not doing DSP in the TP?
Who knows..audio is sometimes unpredictable, I have compared 2
or more transports side by side to find differences between
Johan73 Rodney_Gold
There's another thing you can try:
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36503
Regards
--
omega
omega's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9336
View this thread:
oh no, not again.
--
funkstar
funkstar's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2335
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=48900
funkstar;312545 Wrote:
oh no, not again.
oh yes :o)
btw Omega, what did your friends at the lab conclude?
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...SB3+Stontronics PSU - Altmann
JISCO/UPCI - TACT RCS 2.2X with Good
Yeah native decoding means more processing on-board...but it means less
network traffic too. So if you're looking for rationalisations that
works both ways.
Until it's confirmed with a bit of blind testing *I'm* not going to
lose a jot of sleep over it though. Oh yes...the B word again. :)
omega;312528 Wrote:
Johan73 Rodney_Gold
There's another thing you can try:
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36503
Regards
Native vs server decoding - yes
Display off vs display on - yes, but such a minute difference that even
someone as anal as me doesn't worry.
First
bigfool1956;312566 Wrote:
Native vs server decoding - yes
Display off vs display on - yes, but such a minute difference that even
someone as anal as me doesn't worry.
First song better than the rest - not in my system with a Transporter.
David - are you saying that you can clearly hear
Rodney_Gold;312511 Wrote:
As far as I can make out , Im now doing the decoding on ther server
rather than the TP, dunno why it makes a difference , perhaps cos im
not doing DSP in the TP?
Who knows..audio is sometimes unpredictable, I have compared 2
or more transports side by side
Phil Leigh;312572 Wrote:
David - are you saying that you can clearly hear (and prefer) native
FLAC streaming and conversion over server-side conversion and streaming
as WAV?
Regards
Phil
Hi Phil,
Yes, indeed I am, and my son agrees with me.
Actually I was a bit surprised, because not
bigfool1956;312584 Wrote:
Hi Phil,
Yes, indeed I am, and my son agrees with me.
Actually I was a bit surprised, because not only was I dubious there
would be a difference, but also I thought that if there were a
difference, then the nod would go to transcoding on the server (i.e.
less
In my opinion, the differences between the SB and the Cambridge Audio
transport simply come from the (poor) SB isolation. The CDT drive is
very well isolated, while the SB is not : it needs explicit isolation.
I experienced similar differences in the past and i was obliged to
change the power
Themis;312594 Wrote:
In my opinion, the differences between the SB and the Cambridge Audio
transport simply come from the (poor) SB isolation. The CDT drive is
very well isolated, while the SB is not : it needs explicit isolation.
I experienced similar differences in the past and i was
I wonder if Sean ever put the scope across the spdif whilst trying
different streaming/transcoding combos... :o)
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...SB3+Stontronics PSU - Altmann
JISCO/UPCI - TACT RCS 2.2X with Good
Phil Leigh;312599 Wrote:
Hmmm...possible. My system is very well isolated so maybe I won't see
the differences that David refers to - but I'm pretty sure David is
using some suitable mains conditioning...
I think the answer lies in my post(s) on the 'photos of your
transporter setup' thread.
bigfool1956;312623 Wrote:
I think the answer lies in my post(s) on the 'photos of your transporter
setup' thread.
:)
ys - as I suspected :o)
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...SB3+Stontronics PSU -
And I still want to upgrade the Orbe / SME. Someone should put me in a
padded room for my own good :)
--
bigfool1956
David Ayers
Music is what counts, hifi just helps us enjoy it more
bigfool1956's Profile:
Nonreality;312578 Wrote:
A lot of people will pass on accurate sound when given the choice the
choice of crisper highs and louder lows. The days of dolby nr on
cassettes proved that to me. Tapes were encoded with it but nobody
ever hit the button. It would lower the highs and lows back to
I've recently bought a Squeezebox Duet and have started ripping my cd
collection. I use dBpoweramp Reference and rip to flac. For most cds I
achieve an AccurateRip, so I suppose my rips are close to bit-perfect.
I use an external DAC (Mission DAC5) between the SB and my amp.
However, I still
johan73;312121 Wrote:
I've recently bought a Squeezebox Duet and have started ripping my cd
collection. I use dBpoweramp Reference and rip to flac. For most cds I
achieve an AccurateRip, so I suppose my rips are close to bit-perfect.
I use an external DAC (Mission DAC5) between the SB and
Are you using SPDIF or toslink?
I use SPDIF (my DAC doesn't have toslink).
make sure you have digital outout set to fixed, you are not using
replaygain and the analog outputs is set to 63 (ie off). Make sure
bit rate limiting is set to none.
Stream FLAC as FLAC(ie use the native encoder)
You could use replay gain as long as you don't mistake volume for
quality. Adjust accordingly when comparing.
--
Nonreality
-IF THE RULE YOU FOLLOWED BROUGHT YOU TO THIS, OF WHAT USE IS THE RULE.-
HTTP://www.last.fm/user/nonreality
Phil Leigh;312135 Wrote:
Remember, this is all about clock-recovery /jitter (there is no other
factor that can affect quality - the bits are correct)
I beg to differ. There are THREE things I can think of which could
affect the quality when feeding a digital signal to an external DAC:
1. The
3. Noise emanating from the digital source (either airborne as EMI or
down the SPDIF cable) getting into the analogue circuitry of the DAC.
Can electromagnetic interference (EMI) distort the signal from PC to SB
Receiver? If yes, could this problem be avoided by using cabled
connection to the
johan73;312121 Wrote:
I bought the SB in the belief that the digital output would be equally
good if not better due to less jitter than that from a cd player,
so Im a bit disappointed. Can anyone see obvious flaws in my
set-up/approach?
Johan
Digital is digital. If the source bits
johan73;312206 Wrote:
Can electromagnetic interference (EMI) distort the signal from PC to SB
Receiver? If yes, could this problem be avoided by using cabled
connection to the SB instead of wireless?
I'm guessing here, but it's plausible that EMI from the network might
affect the SBR's
You can try disabling the native FLAC streaming and let the server decode the
file and stream WAV. If this changes things you'll fall into the I hear a
difference where one shouldn't exist camp. There are a bunch of folks that
belong to this :).
1. SqueezeCenter Settings - Advanced - File
johan73;312206 Wrote:
Can electromagnetic interference (EMI) distort the signal from PC to SB
Receiver? If yes, could this problem be avoided by using cabled
connection to the SB instead of wireless?
Do you recommend substituting the SB's original power supply? With
what?
NO! - it's
Suggestion #1. Try listening blind.
Suggestion #2. Avoid the endless debate (and it is endless) over S/PDIF
and DACs by using the on-board DAC of the SB3 (it's not that
bad...really!) or the TP.
Suggestion #3. Buy a cheap linear regulated PS if it makes you feel
better. In the UK they're
I tried this, and it works great with one issue that maybe someone can
help me with. When I create an iTunes library with the TwistedFlac
files, the songs load in just fine but they are not organized by artist
or album. The flacs are all suitably tagged, and the wav shadow files
include the
Purely by accident I found that songs on the virtual disk and synced on
iTunes can be played on my iPod. I wasn't expecting this to occur.
Either:
iTunes copies the music as a WAV to the iPod,
Or iPods have the ability to play FLAC.
Either way, now I can have my FLACs and listen to them to!
He he he... I'm really pleased now. Yup, I love my SlimDevices and the
awesome quality they produce. But sometimes I'm bound to my laptop and
headphones.
Using the same setup as described in my first post, but now pointing
TwistedFLAC to the shared folder containing my FLACs on my primary
Okay - I guess an easier way would have been to keep TwistedFLAC mounted
(on the server PowerMac) and then just use iTunes (laptop) to discover
and share the files. Works both ways.
I'm getting beyond the point of my original post. The purpose was to
point our that you can have FLACs for use
yooper;304351 Wrote:
kphinney,
Thanks a lot for the topic and explanation of getting everything to
work.
I too use flac, and would be interested to try this. I do have a
question.. once iTunes picks up the flac files can you use iTunes to
add album art to the flac files?
My
kphinney,
Thanks a lot for the topic and explanation of getting everything to
work.
I too use flac, and would be interested to try this. I do have a
question.. once iTunes picks up the flac files can you use iTunes to
add album art to the flac files?
My current flac library (also around 500
GuyDebord;303762 Wrote:
JUST USE MAX, IT WILL CONVERT ALL YOUR FLACS IN ONE GO, CANNOT BE
EASIER..
1) I don't want to convert my files. FLAC is what I use and will
continue to use, even if I have to eschew iTunes like I have for years.
2) Max will convert all of your FLACs in one go - no
Nikhil;303643 Wrote:
well .. I just tried TwistedFLAC on my G4 PPC mini and all I get is
a spinning beach-ball ... had to restart twice :( . I know the MacFUSE
part is fine, because NTFS-3G works perfectly. I will wait until
someone gets this running on the platform. Firefly will
kphinney;303996 Wrote:
2) Max will convert all of your FLACs in one go - no question there,
but it DOES NOT retain all tag information. The last time I tried Max I
found myself retyping and hunting cover art for many, many, hours.
If youre tags were correctly done you wouldnt
1 - 100 of 242 matches
Mail list logo
