I admit Bush looked bad when he couldn't find the
words and it happened a few times. But when he got the
words out he definitely took charge.
He really nailed Kerry on the North Korea issue. Kerry
claims he can get all the nations to help with Iraq
but then wants to bypass the multi-lateral talks
--- Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sam likes to
> trot out comments from Blix but conveniently doesn't
> include the later
> statements that Blix felt he was perhaps wrong.
> Statements prior to
> invasion. Same with Russia.
Well , Blix never said that until after the war
started. He d
That's funny.
So you don't believe what Bush said but you believe
what Woodward claims he said?
Even after Powell and Rice said Woodward lied?
-sm
--- Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When Bush's credibility is being questioned, it's
> prudent to look at a
> second party's account.
I only saw the first hour, but I agree.
When they showed the split screen w/ Kerry on one side and Bush on the
other, it Bush always reminded me of that kid at the school event whose
parents forced him to be there. He appeared to be not paying attention.
I was kind of bummed with some of th
I dunno. call me right-brained but the first thing that came to mind was
"Irish Twins". ;^)
The puzzle doesn't say that they're the same age ALL THE TIME after all.
Jim Davis
> An easy example puzzle is: 2 men are the same age, brothers, and have
> the same parents, but they're not twins. How
You're a wise man, your observation is clear and analysis cool (another recent posting of yours is an echo).
Maybe a great tragedy which looms ahead is that we Americans seem too human. We may elect our leader as picking a spouse because "I like her or I like him" instead of doing that like selecti
Don't know yet.
>Aside from the calculator Larry gave you - I love this area! I think
>that it's got a LOT to offer and housing costs (outside the city center
>of course) are pretty reasonable!
>
>Thinking about moving here?
>
>Cheers,
>Erika
>--
[T
Most people will take out what they brought in but my opinion is:
* Bush had a theological, thematic approach.
* Kerry had an informed, professorial approach.
The best gaff though, off of the top of my head, was when Bush did a
little vignette about a war widow he visited and said something like
-Original Message-
From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hindsight. Everyone thought that he had them back then. A prudent person
would have to think he had them based on the evidence and his actions at the
time. From what I've read, he may have even thought he had them
Ok...
-Original Message-
From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 6:57 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: CIA warned Bush not to invade Iraq
Bush. Saw the clip. "That's just... um... guessing."
Dana
- Original Message -
From:
Well I watched it and IMO, Kerry totally owned!
Kerry spent his time clearly and eloquently covering the issues with
specific comments, while Bush stuttered his way through mostly
simpering misguided character attacks and a touchy-feely belief that a
free Iraq will magically bring peace.
Even whe
Aside from the calculator Larry gave you - I love this area! I think
that it's got a LOT to offer and housing costs (outside the city center
of course) are pretty reasonable!
Thinking about moving here?
Cheers,
Erika
--
>>| -Original Message--
hey Isaac
Here's a different perspective. Yeah, it may well be biased against
men :) It does assume that the reader is a woman. But, if you are
genuinely interested in a look at the other side, and I believe you
are, then it may be a place to start.
http://www.nowldef.org/html/pub/kits/divplan/di
yeah, like that nasty election that's dividing the nation :)
- Original Message -
From: Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:44:58 -0400
Subject: Re: CIA warned Bush not to invade Iraq
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Anything that divides the country helps the en
Let's put it this way -- Woodward has been around since Watergate and
has a good reputation for fairness and integrity. Even Bush would seem
to agree, since Plan of Attack is partially based on extensive
interviews with the president.
Dana
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL P
you know what? I agree with every bit of this, and I have sole custody
of my kids. Perhaps this is a measure of just how broken the system is
that both of us, on different sides of such an intimately insulting
system, feel so strongly that it is absolutely and utterly broken.
Dana
- Original
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:48:05 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I posted President Bush's interview where he explains
> why we went to war.
>
> You ignore that and rely on what Woodward says?
When Bush's credibility is being questioned, it's prudent to look at a
second party's
let me help you out. Prosecutor in the OJ Simpson case.
Dana
- Original Message -
From: S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:39:18 -0400
Subject: Re: family law
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks for the name -- I'll have to look that up.
> you have to
Specious logic and blatant jingoism.
-Kevin
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:44:58 -0400, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anything that divides the country helps the enemy. There is a difference between informing people about what is going on and leaking secret intelligence reports about what may
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:24:18 -0500, Andy Ousterhout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hindsight. Everyone thought that he had them back then.
Please stop saying that. I didn't think he had them, and that was
based on information from multiple weapon's inspectors. Sam likes to
trot out comments fro
Thanks for the name -- I'll have to look that up.
> you have to have been there. See, once they get a job they
> are bad
> mommies. Then you can sue for custody. See Marcia Clark.
> Dana
> - Original Message -
> From: S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:23:13
Anything that divides the country helps the enemy. There is a difference between informing people about what is going on and leaking secret intelligence reports about what may happen.
> Do the leaks really help the enemy in any tangible way? Perhaps
> instead they help the American people to know
I'm just happy to see it receiving attention in mainstream media...
whether the proposed revision would be better or worse is subject to
debate -- what we have is seriously broken, and I have no doubt that
it will be a very long time before we have any set of laws that work
well in this area -- if
you have to have been there. See, once they get a job they are bad
mommies. Then you can sue for custody. See Marcia Clark.
Dana
- Original Message -
From: S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:23:13 -0400
Subject: Re: family law
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> oh yeah, good idea. Keep em barefoot and pregnant.
not sure how making them get a job would do that...
s. isaac dealey 954.927.5117
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
add features without fixtures with
the onTap open source framework
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1
h
I've apologized off-list to Isaac for this remark. The apology was my
idea, not his, by the way.
However, in a less heated tone, I'd like to point out that the
proposed laws would merely replace one set of flawed laws with another
set of flawed laws, even more repressive to women. Personally I thi
any time.
larry
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:23:10 -0400, Don Chunshen Li
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> > try this cost of living calculator.
> > http://www.homefair.com/homefair/calc/salcalc.html
> >
> > larry
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:41:08 -0400, Don Chunshen Li
> > <[EMAIL PROTE
the weekly standard again. I don't have time to waste checking their
reporting again. Been there too many times already. Always been full
of it, conclusion: they are probably still at least mostly full of it.
- Original Message -
From: Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004
--- Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, but according to Mr. Bush there has never been
> ANY evidence
> linking Al Queda to Iraq. He's said this plainly.
> Therefore invading
> Iraq disrupted "them", but not Al Queda.
> I'll believe anything that has proof - there is
> none, zero, zip,
Bush. Saw the clip. "That's just... um... guessing."
Dana
- Original Message -
From: Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:05:14 -0500
Subject: RE: CIA warned Bush not to invade Iraq
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Quote from who?
-Original Message-
- Original Message -
From: Won Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:36:39 -0400
Subject: Re: Want to Work For Google?
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Gruss, you still haven't shared why and how you have such a wealth of info
about Wall St.
My wife and I know lots of
oh yeah, good idea. Keep em barefoot and pregnant.
Dana
- Original Message -
From: S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:31:25 -0400
Subject: family law
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I don't have high hopes myself, but some or all of this would be good
news
I'm not really back. But. I suggest that you are giving the benefit of
way too much doubt to a man who is lying to you :)
Hindsight. Everyone thought that he had them back then. A prudent person
would have to think he had them based on the evidence and his actions at the
time. From what I've
I don't have high hopes myself, but some or all of this would be good
news.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,133875,00.html
s. isaac dealey 954.927.5117
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
add features without fixtures with
the onTap open source framework
http://www.sys-con.com/story
Welcome back. I suggest that you are applying today's perspective to
yesterday's problem.
-Original Message-
From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 4:48 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: The politicization of the Iraq War
(deep breath)
Thanks.
> try this cost of living calculator.
> http://www.homefair.com/homefair/calc/salcalc.html
>
> larry
>
>
> On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:41:08 -0400, Don Chunshen Li
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Any one from that region? What's the living expenses look like
> compared to that of Washingt
El Presidente Bush
> Quote from who?
>> And yes, that is a quote.
Though later he did say that he had misdispronounciated himself.
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscriptio
Quote from who?
-Original Message-
From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 3:53 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: CIA warned Bush not to invade Iraq
he would? Seems to me that positive reports were read, negative ones
dismissed as "just guessing
He has a point though - their treatment of the Annie Jacobson claim as
"false" is completely without merit unless you buy into what the
government says, and even then it doesn't make it false.
...
The Snopes page claims that Fed Air Marshals "checked the lavs" after
each suspect had used it. SO?
God i still hate snopes. Something about them just rubs me the wrong way.
"Hi we're snopes! We want to be the end all be all for helping people
figure out if something is a myth." Then you get the people who
whenever they read something run right to snopes to check if god err
snopes says its unt
no, just sticking my head in. Killing a little time before a class.
Probably not fair to engage in political debate when I may not be
around to read the replies for several days, but I can't help myself
:)
- Original Message -
From: Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16
Sorry, but she was a state employee and he was the governor of the state.
I totally agree that the hysteria regarding Clinton's sex life was
very overdone, but let's admit that he IS a sleaze and there is at
least a possibility that he engaged in sexual harassment
Dana
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:31
and in addition yu can tax a tax deduction for doing so, correct?
- Original Message -
From: Won Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:49:48 -0400
Subject: Re: The Election and The Economy
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At 17:29 9/28/2004 -0600, you wrote:
>Question, do
man, let me tell you
I was up in a Native American neighborhood yesterday and jaw-dropping
numbers don't plan to vote.
Dana
- Original Message -
From: Jim Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:21:29 -0500
Subject: Dana Tierney - Re: disappearing for a while
To: CF-C
trust Sam to dig that up out of the local Bush apologist rag :)
Yepper. I plan to put in gajillions of fraudulent registrations.
That's why one of the registrations I took yesterday will have have to
be thrown out before making it to the county clerks office... they
have been on for months now ab
(deep breath)
I guess I have a few minutes.
1. As it turns out the US was not threatened. One could argue that
Bush perhaps thought it was. To which I would reply, given the reports
dismissed as "just guessing" do you really think he exercised due
diligence in finding out?
2. Is oil a vital US
> The whole "we invaded Iraq because of
> WMD/Terrorism/atrocities/cheap
> beer" argument is pointless. Mr. Bush has already
> stated, immediately
> after the war, the main reason that he invaded Iraq
> was because he
> thought it was the US's duty to liberate people.
> This is documented
> by Mr
glad you are ok :)
- Original Message -
From: Marwan Saidi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:17:34 -0400
Subject: Re: florida people
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Made it through ok... lost a few shingles but that's it. The coast
took a beating though... I really feel
you always were dead :) Glad you are ok :)
- Original Message -
From: Bill Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:07:01 -0400
Subject: Re: florida people
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
No i'm dead.
- Original Message -
From: dana tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At 16:19 9/30/2004 -0500, you wrote:
>Maybe you guys hear a lot about I-Bankers (International Bankers?),
>but they are outside of my ken, so I don't think they're THAT big of a
>flaming pile of trend poo
I Bankers = investment bankers or the guys (and most of them are men) who
work at least 90 h
We're having a serious debate here about whether to watch the debates
or go see Shaun of the Dead.
It's a tossup over which will be more funny and revolting.
-Kevin
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:17:13 -0400, Howie Hamlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For those of us watching:
>
> http://www.planetsocks
Maybe you guys hear a lot about I-Bankers (International Bankers?),
but they are outside of my ken, so I don't think they're THAT big of a
flaming pile of trend poo
-Kevin.
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:57:14 -0500, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I'd say you still hear about them.
>
> Fo
For those of us watching:
http://www.planetsocks.com/bingo.asp
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
yeah :)
(I know I just agreed with Bill. Believe me, it scares me too.)
Dana
- Original Message -
From: Bill Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:41:16 -0400
Subject: Re: Woo hoo! Judge blocks part of Patriot Act
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Yea chipping away a
Hey Dana, yup. I thought you were leaving for a bit ... are you back?
- Original Message -
From: dana tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:54:51 -0600
Subject: Re: CIA warned Bush not to invade Iraq
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gruss,
You are referring to Plan
Well, I'd say you still hear about them.
For example, Jeffery Skilling of Enron infame was a McKinsey consultant.
But your right, the I-Bankers are always in the news now. I think
because they're closest to the money and therefore most likely to be
corrupt; thus their news worthyness.
Also, the
you are equating Bush's political interests with the best interest of
the country.
- Original Message -
From: Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:27:21 -0400
Subject: Re: CIA warned Bush not to invade Iraq
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The real question to ask
Gruss,
You are referring to Plan of Attack, correct?
- Original Message -
From: Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:52:04 -0500
Subject: RE: CIA warned Bush not to invade Iraq
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Guss,
Thanks for this post. Very interesting. N
he would? Seems to me that positive reports were read, negative ones
dismissed as "just guessing". And yes, that is a quote.
- Original Message -
From: Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:53:02 -0500
Subject: RE: CIA warned Bush not to invade Iraq
To: CF-Community
Always a concern. Frankly, this filtering is a management nightmare.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 3:34 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: CIA warned Bush not to invade Iraq
Andy Ousterhout wrote:
I've grown used to the Larry insults, to a point where
I expect them.
-sm
--- Chris Stoner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> > I'm not getting into a pissing contest with you.
> if you go for
> > personal insults that's your thing.
> >
> And it very well might be my thing.
Andy Ousterhout wrote:
> Come-on folks, do really believe that the only reports created and sent to
> Bush positively supported the war?
No. But I am not so sure about the ones that actually passed through the filters and reached his desk.
Jochem
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription
Robert Munn wrote:
> The real question to ask here is who in the CIA leaked these
> documents? There is a faction in the CIA that clearly wants the
> President to fail
I would describe it as 'protect their own position'. The people who wrote that report are intelligence professionals, and when B
But barring giving each respondent an IQ test, it seems a fairly good litmus...
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations
Hi Deanna,
I used to visit Duluth which is a northern MN town at the western tip
of lake superior. We'd drive over to WI at about Midnight as MN bar
close was at 1am.
We get an outdoor picnic table at a bar (Schultz's) that was at the
bottom of the bridge. You'd snuggle in and watch the drunks
Equating a college graduate with intelligence isn't always the best way
to go. I don't have a degree and I are very the smart yes. Now, where
did I put my lottery tickets?
- Jim
Jerry Johnson wrote:
>Not really, Larry.
>
>The percentages might be higher with Daily Show viewers, but what abou
At 15:04 9/30/2004 -0500, you wrote:
>You're in!! Apply to McKinsey or Bain immediately.
I remember in the early to mid 80s consultants were hot shots. Now, well
you barely here about them. You just hear about the I-Bankers.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscri
You're in!! Apply to McKinsey or Bain immediately.
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:14:27 -0400, Ben Doom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > An easy example puzzle is: 2 men are the same age, brothers, and have
> > the same parents, but they're not twins. How can this be?
>
> 2 of triplets, quadruplets, e
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:13:08 -0500, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> There's large caravans of "people and things" that travel into
> Wisconsin every night too, but that doesn't mean they contain WMD. In
> this case it's drunks. Who knows, maybe the bars close later Syria
> than in Iraq?
Wait -
try this cost of living calculator.
http://www.homefair.com/homefair/calc/salcalc.html
larry
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:41:08 -0400, Don Chunshen Li
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any one from that region? What's the living expenses look like compared to that of Washington, DC?
>
> TIA.
>
>
[Todays
Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> I'm not getting into a pissing contest with you. if you go for
> personal insults that's your thing.
>
And it very well might be my thing. I'm just trying to point out that
based on your declaration of Sam's inability to deal with declarative
statements, it's apparently
Any one from that region? What's the living expenses look like compared to that of Washington, DC?
TIA.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
ROTFL!
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:26:37 -0500
Subject: Re: Bill O'Reilly, wrong again
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You're right. It appears that a self-selecting group of younger,
intelligent people watch Stewart while a
I'm not getting into a pissing contest with you. if you go for
personal insults that's your thing.
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:01:26 -0400, Chris Stoner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> pom·pous adj. Characterized by excessive self-esteem or exaggerated
> dignity;
>
> I would characterize your statemen
> - Original Message -
> From: Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Two days before the war [SNIP] large
> caravans of people and things, including some of the
> top 55 [most wanted] Iraqis, going to Syria," Gen.
> DeLong explained.
> According to you he's definitely lying because he
> d
pom·pous adj. Characterized by excessive self-esteem or exaggerated
dignity;
I would characterize your statement about Sam's supossed 'problem(s)
with declarative sentances' as being quite pompous. Thats not an
insult, its what it was (IMO). Is it ok for you to speak (write) in an
insultin
What in the hell did we go into Iraq for if we knew this 2 days before!!! ?
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:52:13 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Two days before the war, on March 17 [2003], we saw
> through multiple intelligence channels - both human
> intelligence and technica
I would suggest that being obnoxious is not the way to go either. Quit
with the insults.
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:07:48 -0400, Chris Stoner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually it doesn't. This declarative sentence states that a higher
> ratio of Stewart listeners completed four years of college w
No its a matter of proportions. 8 of 10 vs 6 of 10. A simple test of
proportions will return a statistically significant chi square showing
that the difference in proportions is not likely due to chance.
larry
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:01:13 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The N
--- William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I hope you're not one of the 20% of Daily show
> viewers
> > that thinks it's a real news show.
>
> Neither am I one of the percent of O'Reilly viewers
> that believes his
> is a news show too... ;-)
>
> Where did the 20% figure come from? I went
But my wife listens to me spout off about political stuff every night (and
sometimes I am even humorous!). That means that I could claim 100% of my
viewing audience has a 4 year college degree. So percentages really don't
matter...
Ray
At 02:11 PM 9/30/2004, you wrote:
>Even if you take thos
Even if you take those numbers, which I assume are for example only,
you still have a higher percentage of total viewership with 4 years of
college watching the Daily Show.
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
[Todays T
Not really, Larry.
The percentages might be higher with Daily Show viewers, but what about the actual people totals.
If the Factor's pop is larger, he may have more college grads total than the Daily Show has.
Jerry Johnson
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/30/04 01:52PM >>>
Are you sure about that? You
Actually it doesn't. This declarative sentence states that a higher
ratio of Stewart listeners completed four years of college which does
not mean the same thing as 'there are more four year graduates viewing
Stewarts show'. There is not enough evidence in this particular
sentence to determin
The Nielson report has no details. The way I read this
is:
If Stewart has 40,000 viewers and 80% have four year
degrees and O'Reilly has 2 million viewers and 60%
have four year degrees than viewers of the Daily show
are more likely to have four year degrees.
Since I don't have the details I was
> I hope you're not one of the 20% of Daily show viewers
> that thinks it's a real news show.
Neither am I one of the percent of O'Reilly viewers that believes his
is a news show too... ;-)
Where did the 20% figure come from? I went back and re-read the
article and didn't see that.
Oddly enough
It depends on who is the enemy.Take the recent cases of CIA operatives
being outed by administration personnel. That was intended to weaken a
Democratic position. There may be others who are pissed at the current
administration and find it appropriate to leak damaging information.
This sort of thin
Are you sure about that? You seem to have a problem with declarative sentances.
"Viewers of Jon Stewart's show are more likely to have completed four
years of college than people who watch "The O'Reilly Factor,"
according to Nielsen Media Research."
More likely means that there are more viewers
Still though, very tasty.
<>
/me wishes I could get some foie gras not made of duck in this country...
> it looks like dog vomit
I always thought it looked more like prechewed steak, but hey,
everybody has their own interpretation I suppose.
:-)
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would
I like Japanese style but like Kevin I can't maintain the level of organization needed for it. I also like totally modern whacky styles- odd shaped purple sofas, lime green round coffee tables- stuff you find in funky furniture shops on Melrose in L.A. Or I could go for the modern minimalist feel,
> If you're going to put it that way...
> I bet there are more people with four year degrees
> that watch O'Reilly than Stewart.
But you see that is not what the data shows, which was the point of
the article. you did read the article, no?
The data points out that people with four years of coll
--- William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And who
> says having four years of college makes you less
> likely to partake in the occasional blunt?
>
> It doesn't, but...
> Four years of college does tend to make one more
> educated, better
> read, better suited to discern logical arguments,
it looks like dog vomit
- Original Message -
From: William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:54:51 -0700
Subject: Re: Foie Gras - "a major victory for the ducks and geese."
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It's quite tasty, actually, what's not to get?
mm... ta
At 12:30 9/30/2004 -0500, you wrote:
>Do the leaks really help the enemy in any tangible way? Perhaps
>instead they help the American people to know what is going on and to
>better decide their leadership.
I think intelligence leaks may help the enemy. Just like leaving your door
unlocked may fa
If you're going to put it that way...
I bet there are more people with four year degrees
that watch O'Reilly than Stewart. It's the fact that
O'Reilly is so successful he gets a larger variety.
Are you saying that if you don't have a four year
degree your an idiot?
-sm
--- Kevin Graeme <[EMAI
Also lets look at the size of the audiences?
What, O'Reilly's audience is bigger, so naturally we should expect it
to be less educated?
And who
says having four years of college makes you less
likely to partake in the occasional blunt?
It doesn't, but...
Four years of college does tend to make
Do the leaks really help the enemy in any tangible way? Perhaps
instead they help the American people to know what is going on and to
better decide their leadership.
-Kevin
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:27:21 -0400, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The real question to ask here is who in the CIA
You're right. It appears that a self-selecting group of younger,
intelligent people watch Stewart while a great number of idiots of all
ages flock to O'Reilly!
;-p
-Kevin
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:14:48 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also lets look at the size of the audiences
The real question to ask here is who in the CIA leaked these documents? There is a faction in the CIA that clearly wants the President to fail and is actively trying to undermine the Administration in it's efforts in Iraq. This is shameful and possibly criminal behavior and the people responsible f
One word Hockey. Americans got their butt kicked in the World Cup recently.
larry
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:08:07 -0500, Marlon Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Silly Canadiansthink you can best the U.S. in homicide rates.
> That shows you, were a full 3.96 pts higher than you Canadians. Neve
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo
