I am picky on all of them.
On 5/4/09, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> I have started to get a variety of people from around the world wanting to
> friend me. Twitter is one thing, but having a bunch of random people have
> access to your Facebook network? Does anyone do that? To me Facebook seems
> like
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Dana wrote:
>
> it should
>
>
> http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Security/Congress-Comes-to-Help-Run-the-Internet-584749/?kc=EWKNLVPU05042009STR1
>
Let's wait and see what they come up with. I support privacy rights, but not
at the expense of security. Boucher has done
I have started to get a variety of people from around the world wanting to
friend me. Twitter is one thing, but having a bunch of random people have
access to your Facebook network? Does anyone do that? To me Facebook seems
like a family/colleagues place, LinkedIn seems like a colleagues place, an
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Zaphod wrote:
>
> So I'm painfully listening to the Mike Gallagher show to hear the Nate
> Phelps interview. The Fox News update came on and one of the stories
> was "Stuck in traffic, blame it on Obama" and the story went on to say
> that the public works packag
The first steps of conflict negotiation is to determine what the
problems are on both sides. Have you tried asking your daughter why
she is behaving in this way? A reasoned, quiet discussion with her
might bring out issues of which you are unaware. When a sweet, loving
child turns petulant, the
getting back to the point here you know, I think that the people who
think the fact that she is reading is a sign she is bored may have a point.
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Erika L. Walker wrote:
>
> I wasnt advocating EITHER just for the record.
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Dana
I have never seen the Big Lebowski, but damn that is a funny line.
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> To quote the Big Lebowski:
>
> "You're not wrong, Walter, you're just an asshole."
>
> Fox, of course, is usually also wrong.
>
> Judah
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 3:24 PM,
To quote the Big Lebowski:
"You're not wrong, Walter, you're just an asshole."
Fox, of course, is usually also wrong.
Judah
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> That still does not mean that the projects that are part of the stimulus
> bill will not increase traffic.
> I und
That still does not mean that the projects that are part of the stimulus
bill will not increase traffic.
I understand what you are saying, and agree with you, but it does not make
the statement (as misleading as it may be) by FOX false.
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Casey Dougall <
ca...@uberwe
> cftodd wrote:
>
> I don't really need to. I already firmly believed my earlier statement
> and therefor do not need independent verification.
>
well I was kind of teaming up with you and replying to Scott
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion
I don't really need to. I already firmly believed my earlier statement
and therefor do not need independent verification.
Gruss Gott wrote:
>> cfTodd wrote:
>>
>> No kidding! Plunging to one's death is a once in a lifetime experience.
>>
>
> Ask the people who died when the main north-sou
> cfTodd wrote:
>
> No kidding! Plunging to one's death is a once in a lifetime experience.
>
Ask the people who died when the main north-south freeway bridge in
Minneapolis collapsed during rush hour. Oh, right. They're dead
~~~
i have spanked girls much older then her.
you can in fact spank girls well into there mid 30's earlie 40's..
after that i think it may be inappropriate..
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic rel
I wasnt advocating EITHER just for the record.
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Dana wrote:
> you can't spank a girl that age.
>
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Fr
you can't spank a girl that age.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 6:17 AM, Erika L. Walker wrote:
>
> I "think" you are kidding. At least I hope so
>
> Spanking is one thing. "Bslapping" your daughter at any age is inexcusable
> and why some women find it acceptable as adults to be in abusive
> relat
Oops, sorry, "graphic novels". But is Richie Rich really a graphic novel?
http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1895447,00.html
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
G
No kidding! Plunging to one's death is a once in a lifetime experience.
Scott Stroz wrote:
> You really need to live on the edge a little more ;)
>
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic releas
You really need to live on the edge a little more ;)
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Casey Dougall <
ca...@uberwebsitesolutions.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> >
> > Right, and those projects will lead to increased traffic.
> >
>
> Right, and by 2010 I won
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> Right, and those projects will lead to increased traffic.
>
Right, and by 2010 I won't cringe every time I drive over the bridge that
connects Fish creek to Saratoga lake.
This won't be a traffic issue but a detour adding about 15 minutes
Right, and those projects will lead to increased traffic.
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Casey Dougall <
ca...@uberwebsitesolutions.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> >
> > Meh...
> > Its not a far stretch to think that there wil lbe more traffic from
> > in
Sorry this is a little late in the game but here is what I would do.
Remove everything from her room except the bed, blankets, and pillows. Take
the door to her bedroom off the hinges and place it where she can see it.
Let her earn her items back, including her bedroom door, thru good behavior.
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> Meh...
> Its not a far stretch to think that there wil lbe more traffic from
> increased road work projects. And since these projects are being funded by
> the stimulus paln Obama put into play, then, why can't we blame him for
> increased
> Judah wrote:
> put it politely) without any backing evidence. Go take a look at the
> links that Robert posted about physician salaries.
I need to do that because I work in health care for a living and am
intimately aware of fee schedules, pay, and ... proclivities.
And you're right - primary
Meh...
Its not a far stretch to think that there wil lbe more traffic from
increased road work projects. And since these projects are being funded by
the stimulus paln Obama put into play, then, why can't we blame him for
increased traffic?
If it happens on his watch, its his fault...just ask Gru
it should
http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Security/Congress-Comes-to-Help-Run-the-Internet-584749/?kc=EWKNLVPU05042009STR1
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http:
How can an insurer possibly get volume discounts for supplies and meds from
different hospitals, pharamcies, etc?
Will the gov't start running pharmacies, hospitals and doctor's offices now
too?
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> Bargaining power with physicians on reimbur
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
> The link I posted to PCP salaries was not to compare them to other
> types of doctors. It was to refute the point you put out there saying
> that even the worst doctor in the country could make several hundred
> thousand dollars a year and
Bargaining power with physicians on reimbursement rates, bulk
purchasing power for medications, all sorts of things. Being big has
its advantages. I'd say that group purchase power on pharmaceuticals
will be one big cost saver. It is true that they might be able to
reduce reimbursement rates for
a lot of slippery slope arguments here I agree
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:28 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> > You have shown that one study shows that 'primary care physicians' make
> less
> > than doctors in other specialties (the numbers Rob
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
> 1.) You cut their pay across the board. E.g., eye surgeons will now
> make $250k max (not $1m+) That will be brutal. or
>
> 2.) You "deregulate" just like the airlines and force doctors to
> compete and consumers to select.
>
> I don't favor
Bargaining power with whom? I take that as the 'single payer' would be
better able to negotiate reimbursement rates...which is what private
insurers are dong now. Several doctores I was friends with in New Jersey
said it was like being shaken down by the mob for 'protection moey'. If
they did not
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:28 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> You have shown that one study shows that 'primary care physicians' make less
> than doctors in other specialties (the numbers Rob posted seem to dis-prove
> what you are tryign to say) - that is a far cry from proof that doctors in
> general do
I just saw the same angle in USA Today. I feel the need to note that I
didn't buy the PoC; it was lying around where I ate breakfast.
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <
zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> So I'm painfully listening to the Mike Gallagher show to hear the Nate
> Dana wrote:
>
> Dammit Gruss I don't have time for another forever thread, But you
> said you agreed with me then restate the same position. I am not
> particularly a fan of single payer, but you are, really you are,
> arguing as an ideologue here.
>
Well maybe we're crossing wires then because
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <
zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> So I'm painfully listening to the Mike Gallagher show to hear the Nate
> Phelps interview. The Fox News update came on and one of the stories
> was "Stuck in traffic, blame it on Obama" and the story wen
So I'm painfully listening to the Mike Gallagher show to hear the Nate
Phelps interview. The Fox News update came on and one of the stories
was "Stuck in traffic, blame it on Obama" and the story went on to say
that the public works package would mean more highway work thus, more
traffic jams
you're being pretty specious too. A larger pool is more streamlined and has
more bargaining power, as well as more capacity to absorb catastrophic
costs. Geez.
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Judah McAuley
wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> It involves inc
Dammit Gruss I don't have time for another forever thread, But you
said you agreed with me then restate the same position. I am not
particularly a fan of single payer, but you are, really you are,
arguing as an ideologue here.
It is not as simple as shifting the costs, as the behavior of patients
May the 4th be with you!
(Shamelessly stolen from Darth Vader via Twitter)
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
>
> It involves increasing the risk pool, strengthening the bargaining
> position, investing in preventative medicine and streamlining
> administration.
By 'strengthening the bargaining position' I assme you mean the same
strong-arm techni
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> You and Rob and (to a lesser extent) Scott have argued that single
> payer is inherently stupid and that doctors are only in it for money
> and would never back systematic healthcare reform with the government
> as a primary insurance age
> Dana wrote:
> The fact that Joe Schmo can't afford his premiums does not mean that
> he is any more expensive to insure than you or I.
I totally agree. I am simply pointing out that the problem is not
*who pays* the problem is the total cost and that cost is out of
control.
If you know anyone
42 matches
Mail list logo
