His show is on ABC. That's about as major as media gets.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> I don't think many people watch him.
> Certainly not major media.
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Maureen wrote:
>>
>> Jimmy Kimmel, last I checked was on TV. TV = Media
>>
>> On Thu
That is because you are not from Chicago ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 11:50 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: That was quick
I don't know how to respond to that...
it's best I don't
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:40 AM, Eri
I don't know how to respond to that...
it's best I don't
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:40 AM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> If he brought Chicago style politics to the Whitehouse, we would have single
> payer healthcare and a booming green energy industry and every other thing
> he promised on the campa
Right on track huh? So this was the plan? 5 plus years of 10%
unemployment? Can we switch tracks?
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> They did just announce that indicators show that a double dip recession
> isn't going to happen...so I would say we are on the right track
You're probably the only that watches Kieth. I bet more people watch
Jimmy Kimmel.
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Yeah...that's the guy...you prolly heard that from Kieth Olberman who had a
> segment of his show about him after he won the primary that wasn't very
> pos
I don't think many people watch him.
Certainly not major media.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Jimmy Kimmel, last I checked was on TV. TV = Media
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Sam wrote:
>>
>> Probably Jimmy Kimmel, it was like two months ago.
>> Ions in cybernews
If he brought Chicago style politics to the Whitehouse, we would have single
payer healthcare and a booming green energy industry and every other thing
he promised on the campaign trail and Joe Lieberman would be on the bottom
of the Potomac with a pair of cement shoes. Unless you have lived in
C
They did just announce that indicators show that a double dip recession
isn't going to happen...so I would say we are on the right track.
-Original Message-
From: denstar [mailto:valliants...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 9:30 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: That was quick
Yeah...that's the guy...you prolly heard that from Kieth Olberman who had a
segment of his show about him after he won the primary that wasn't very
positive. So the theory of the media not talking about him and pointing out
how "irregular" this guy was because he was a dem is pretty much a crock
I watched from "very close" while the events discussed in that ad were
happening. Offlist, I'll tell you why I find that ad to be totally
laughable.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> what you didn't like the demon sheep ad?
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRY7wBuCcBY
Jimmy Kimmel, last I checked was on TV. TV = Media
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Probably Jimmy Kimmel, it was like two months ago.
> Ions in cybernews years
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Maureen wrote:
>>
>> You don't even know the guy's name, but you've seen an ad by
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:30 PM, denstar wrote:
>>> I think that Obama is trying to do exactly what he said he wanted to do.
>>> Unfortunately it's not what people really want *or* even the reason he was
>>> elected.
>>
>> He's doing what I said he was going to do, not what he said.
>
> Comp
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:30 PM, denstar wrote:
>> It's sad you see it that way but probably agree with J and G that
>> anyone not loving Obama is irrational or an idiot. I'm not saying
>> there aren't a few nutters amongst the tea-party, but you threw out
>> the entire crop.
>
> You jump to "lo
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Matthew Small wrote:
>>
>> I think that Obama is trying to do exactly what he said he wanted to do.
>> Unfortunately it's not what people really want *or* even the reason he was
>> elected.
>
> He's doing what I sa
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:42 PM, denstar wrote:
>>
>> The Tea Party has a lot of a lot of things. Too many nutbags for my
>> taste though. Which is a shame. "Co-opted" comes to mind, as in to
>> take or assume for one's own use; appropriate.
>
> I
what you didn't like the demon sheep ad?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRY7wBuCcBY
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Here's my favorite political ad from the California governors race:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctTuJ65et0E
>
> "Just buy me a sun dress and put me in
Alvin Greene is his name
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> You talking about the vet that is going against DeMint that seems to have
> come about the money to run out of nowhere? Kinda heavy set black guy?
~~
You talking about the vet that is going against DeMint that seems to have
come about the money to run out of nowhere? Kinda heavy set black guy?
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 7:48 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: FactCheck.org
Probably Jimmy Kimmel, it was like two months ago.
Ions in cybernews years
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> You don't even know the guy's name, but you've seen an ad by his
> opponent? Do you live in South Carolina? If not, where did you see
> the ad, and how did you find ou
Apology accepted.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> OK, I'm sorry I mocked you. I hate violence and never hurt anyone
> unless I'm hit first, even than I try hard not to do damage.
> But I never hit a girl, even after getting hit. I don't even wish Dio
> mourners to hurt those West
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Matthew Small wrote:
>
> I think that Obama is trying to do exactly what he said he wanted to do.
> Unfortunately it's not what people really want *or* even the reason he was
> elected.
He's doing what I said he was going to do, not what he said.
> He was ele
You don't even know the guy's name, but you've seen an ad by his
opponent? Do you live in South Carolina? If not, where did you see
the ad, and how did you find out about it?
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> His opponent mentioned it in an ad?
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 8:40
His opponent mentioned it in an ad?
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> If the media hasn't mentioned it because he's a Dem, how do you know about it?
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.a
If the media hasn't mentioned it because he's a Dem, how do you know about it?
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> What about the felon that won the primary? He sure as hell isn't going
> to mention it and since he's a dem the media wouldn't mention it.
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 7:
Obama would have lost
He had no past and ran against Bush and Palin.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> The only thing voters should be told by a candidate are: 1. What have
> they done to gain experience that makes them a good fit for the
> position to which they are seek
What about the felon that won the primary? He sure as hell isn't going
to mention it and since he's a dem the media wouldn't mention it.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> I think that you should be banned from mentioning your opponent in any
> ads. I don't want to know abou
> Here's my favorite candidate in any race. Wish I
> could vote for him.
Interesting premise to campaign on, but saying the rent is too high and
having a solution for the problem are two different things. Not once did I
hear anything about how he's planning to make rents more affordable. Is he
OK, I'm sorry I mocked you. I hate violence and never hurt anyone
unless I'm hit first, even than I try hard not to do damage.
But I never hit a girl, even after getting hit. I don't even wish Dio
mourners to hurt those Westerborough fools.
Just a mellow guy.
When you stated republicans attacked
Yeah.
See, I don't even really care how he treats his animals or wives (assuming
he has any)
I would also vote for him just on that one simple idea.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Here's my favorite candidate in any race. Wish I could vote for him.
>
> http://www.youtube
Ideally, but that would require a system that actually worked that
way. If we could have mandatory candidate questionnaires that then got
given out to all the voters and we could easily fire an elected
official based off of lies/omissions/etc on the survey, then yeah,
that might work.
As it is, I
To use the analogy of a job interview, don't you think it is up to the
voter to do background checks and check references before hiring the
candidate?
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> I can see this from a job interview sort of point of view. We, as
> voters, are interv
He has awesome facial hair.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Here's my favorite candidate in any race. Wish I could vote for him.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x4o-TeMHys0
>
> http://www.rentistoodamnhigh.org
~
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> The only thing voters should be told by a candidate are: 1. What have
> they done to gain experience that makes them a good fit for the
> position to which they are seeking election; 2. What they plan to do
> if they get elected; 3. Where th
Here's my favorite candidate in any race. Wish I could vote for him.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x4o-TeMHys0
http://www.rentistoodamnhigh.org/
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfus
bwahahaha
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 6:39 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: FactCheck.org Campaign Whoppers of 2010
Damn you...I was just going to reply with something along those lines
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 7:
Pretty sure the media would take care of notification of any felon who
is running, along with any misdemeanors like a spit-ball fight in five
grade. They are much more about spreading the dirt than discussing
the issues.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> I understand thi
For the record, I don't think anyone _should_ tell the voters that one
of the candidates running for office is a life long felon.
Again, if someone wants to know, they can easily find out through
public records.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> I understand this positio
Here's my favorite political ad from the California governors race:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctTuJ65et0E
"Just buy me a sun dress and put me in a Prius!"
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> Pretty sure I know who I would vote for based on that clip...and I
> don't
The only thing voters should be told by a candidate are: 1. What have
they done to gain experience that makes them a good fit for the
position to which they are seeking election; 2. What they plan to do
if they get elected; 3. Where they stand on issues that are important
to voters. Period.
If th
Pretty sure I know who I would vote for based on that clip...and I
don't care that I have no idea where each stands on what issues.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Some of the ads running out here never mention the candidate they are
> for except in the "I approved this" line
I understand this position and can see the appeal. What I'm trying to
find out though is who, exactly, should tell the voters that one of
the people running for the office is a life long felon with a rap
sheet a mile long. I'd argue that *someone* should mention it. If you
agree that voters should
Damn you...I was just going to reply with something along those lines
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> I suppose, if he is running for animal catcher...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 20
Some of the ads running out here never mention the candidate they are
for except in the "I approved this" line at the end. The result being
I end up knowing more about their opponent that I do them, which is
nice when their opponent has the same positions on the issues that I
do.
Did you see the
I suppose, if he is running for animal catcher...
-Original Message-
From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 6:19 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: FactCheck.org Campaign Whoppers of 2010
If your opponent had pertinent information about their b
I think it would be ok to say Michael Vick was convicted of animal
cruelty..but that is not the way a current candidate would say it.
They would say something like "A million animals were killed this
week. Michael Vick supports animal cruelty". The distortion of the
second example is what needs
I don't care if I am running against a life long felon with a rap
sheet a mile long, none of my television ads nor mailings should be
allowed to mention them or anything they may have done. They should
only be allowed to mention what I have done/will do in the position to
which I am seeking to be
If your opponent had pertinent information about their background, say
Michael Vick runs for office and we think it is important to mention
that he has an animal abuse background, should the opponent not get to
mention that? Would you leave it to outside groups but not allow the
candidate? Should
I think that you should be banned from mentioning your opponent in any
ads. I don't want to know about them, I wan tot know about you.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> I've been advocating that for years.
>
> If a politician lies while campaigning, they should be removed from
There is a lot of truth in this statement for me, but it's more that
he was the anti-McCain. McCain sold out all his values and got in bed
with the Religion Right to get elected, then picked Caribou Barbie as
a running mate. Any candidate, even a dead skunk, would have been
preferable to me than
I think that Obama is trying to do exactly what he said he wanted to do.
Unfortunately it's not what people really want *or* even the reason he was
elected.
He was elected as a reaction to a horrible eight years of GWB. People are
hateful to Wall Street, he is the anti-Wall Street. People w
>On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:29 PM, G Money wrote:
>>
>
>> Are you saying that people are mad because he promised all kinds of
>> unprecedented sweeping changes.and then couldn't wrap them all up in 2
>> shorts years, in time for the mid term elections?
>
>He promised change and hope, he ne
Yeah..I knew a lot about them. One was the ex of a family member.
The other was a former neighbor.
The first one was sentenced to 70 years to life for various crimes and
died in prison.
The second one was shot and killed fleeing arrest.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> I missed
I missed the protestant part.
So you knew a lot about these men. Do tell.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Sam wrote:
> I was not laughing at you suffering, I found the claim humorous
> because not only is it so far out there but you claimed it happened
> more than once.
>
>
> Why did they beat
I was not laughing at you suffering, I found the claim humorous
because not only is it so far out there but you claimed it happened
more than once.
Why did they beat you?
How did you know they were republican?
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> My "claim" was nothing more tha
LOL. True.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Ah, thanks for clearing that up.
>
> Information overload is getting worse, especially when anyone can
> publish to Google news.
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:41 PM, William Bowen
> wrote:
>>
>>> Didn't they just say HFCS isn't bad e
Well, if he mentioned begging for it, then it obviously falls in the first
meaning, believing there was an assault, which makes his statement only
possible from a jerk. So I guess that solved that mystery.
But I have to run. I got roped into putting together a puzzle tonight with a
random old per
Ah, thanks for clearing that up.
Information overload is getting worse, especially when anyone can
publish to Google news.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:41 PM, William Bowen wrote:
>
>> Didn't they just say HFCS isn't bad either? I won't believe them if they do.
>
> A (The?) High Fructose Corn Syr
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:42 PM, denstar wrote:
>
> The Tea Party has a lot of a lot of things. Too many nutbags for my
> taste though. Which is a shame. "Co-opted" comes to mind, as in to
> take or assume for one's own use; appropriate.
It's sad you see it that way but probably agree with J
My "claim" was nothing more than a statement of fact. I have been
severely assaulted twice. Both times by men who were white,
protestant and Republicans.
Sam found my suffering funny, even accused me of begging for it.
You can assume whatever you want. It doesn't change the facts.
On Thu, Oc
> Those guys have learned a lot from the tobacco lobby.
Next they'll tell us it better 'cause "It's toasted"
or maybe just "It's better than Olestra!"
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
I cannot and will not speak for Sam, but I read that either as finding the
beating funny, or finding your claim unreal and funny.
Since I personally tend to try to go with the least annoying option whenever
possible when reading into the statements of others, I assumed the latter.
On Thu, Oct
I explained that to you.
It's too funny because: I can see you begging for the beating, but I
just can't see a republican doing it.
It's funny because it's so improbable you either:
1) made it up
2) really, really really begged for it
3) think union thugs with tea-party signs are republicans
I
"Not completely toxic" isn't quite the same thing as "good for you".
I suppose it could count as good in the sense that the calories will
help keep you alive if you are starving to death. Otherwise, I have a
hard time seeing it as "good". And I'd once again point out that they
are trying to rename
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Sam wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:05 PM, denstar wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Sam wrote:
>> ...
>>> But you're not a lefty, you're in the middle.
>>
>> I find it hilarious that you think you are in the middle. That the
>> Tea Party represents th
> Didn't they just say HFCS isn't bad either? I won't believe them if they do.
A (The?) High Fructose Corn Syrup manufacturers association recently
ran some ads that said HFCS is "good for you in moderation"...
it becomes difficult to be moderate in one's consumption when it is in
*everything* t
Sam to cf-community in the Bad NPR thread Oct 22
You get beat up by republicans? That's too funny.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/thread.cfm/threadid:32588#329706
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> I did no such thing and you know it.
> I mean the other you knows
I can proudly say you agree with him.
That right there says it all.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> By the looks of your posts, I would say he is right on target.
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthol
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:05 PM, denstar wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Sam wrote:
> ...
>> But you're not a lefty, you're in the middle.
>
> I find it hilarious that you think you are in the middle. That the
> Tea Party represents the middle. =)
I never claim the middle, although
By the looks of your posts, I would say he is right on target.
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 3:27 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: That was quick
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
>
> I personally think t
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Sam wrote:
...
> But you're not a lefty, you're in the middle.
I find it hilarious that you think you are in the middle. That the
Tea Party represents the middle. =)
@G Money, props.
@Mama, I wonder the same thing about a Bush-o-meter.
:Den
--
I maintain th
>Oh? You think we should have elected someone who had experience as a US
president?
A little more experience at running things other than campaigns would
have been nice.
Don't get me wrong. He's still got a chance at my vote in 2012, and my
votes on Tuesday are going to be pretty well split bet
Carbs that are converted to sugars that aren't consumed by your body go to
your liver which converts it to fat. The diabetic's enemy ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Casey Dougall [mailto:ca...@uberwebsitesolutions.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 1:22 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re:
I did no such thing and you know it.
I mean the other you knows it.
About those meds...
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> just as much as your tin foil hat is on too tight.
>
> You chortled with glee because someone of an opposing political
> ideology was assaulted. How
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:59 PM, G Money wrote:
>
> The national debt was already skyrocketing..and I don't recall him ever
> saying he'd reduce the national debt by the mid term elections...?
Nice that you threw in "by the mid term"
$5 trillion is going to take a long time to pay off
> Not me.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 1:14 PM, C. Hatton Humphrey wrote:
> Here's a list of promises (and where they stand). It's up to
> interpretation as far is if he can actually deliver. I like this
> breakdown.
> http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/
So he has kept 122 promises, is working on
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
>
> I personally think that even if Obama was the second coming of Lincoln _and_
> Reagan, balanced the budget, solved the financial crisis, brought peace to
> the Middle East, and scored the winning goal against The Russians in Olympic
> hock
> I'd be interested to see a list of the so-called promises. Did he
> really promise changes he couldn't do, or has the pundit spin
> introduced into media and blogosphere a lot claims of promises that he
> really didn't make?
Here's a list of promises (and where they stand). It's up to
interpre
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:29 PM, G Money wrote:
>
> Are you saying that people are mad because he promised all kinds of
> unprecedented sweeping changes.and then couldn't wrap them all up in 2
> shorts years, in time for the mid term elections?
He promised change and hope, he never said
> Are you saying that people are mad because he promised all kinds of
> unprecedented sweeping changes.and then couldn't wrap them all up in 2
> shorts years, in time for the mid term elections?
It's not that he couldn't deliver them - it's that he DID NOT deliver
them. There were a coup
just as much as your tin foil hat is on too tight.
You chortled with glee because someone of an opposing political
ideology was assaulted. How different is that from what the
brownshirts did? Right now its only a matter of degree from what I've
seen of your behavior.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:03
Agree on the partisan stuff. Rahm Emanuel is gone. Resigned to run
for mayor of Chicago. Now if he would dump Eric Holder, I'd be a
happy camper.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
> I think that 25% is still hoping for him to drop the partisan bullshit, and
> people like
Are you off your meds again?
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> I was talking about you. Your joking and glee at the assault is pure
> brownshirt behavior. That's the amazing thing - your blatent condoning
> of a physical assault simply because you disagreed with her. Wh
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> >
> > Kristallnacht 2012?
> >
>
> Worst.Concert.Ever.
>
Kristallnacht (the real one) was obviously awfulan evil event that was a
harbinger for many evil events to come.but that being said, it cannot be
denied that "Kristallnacht" is a ri
I'd be interested to see a list of the so-called promises. Did he
really promise changes he couldn't do, or has the pundit spin
introduced into media and blogosphere a lot claims of promises that he
really didn't make? His opposition has taken his campaign slogan of
hope and change, and turned it
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Sisk, Kris wrote:
>
> At any rate, near as the American
> public can see, he's not even trying to implement those changes. There's
> more corruption on Capitol Hill being reported than ever,
There is? Source please.
> the national
> debt is skyrocketing,
T
I personally think that even if Obama was the second coming of Lincoln _and_
Reagan, balanced the budget, solved the financial crisis, brought peace to
the Middle East, and scored the winning goal against The Russians in Olympic
hockey, 40% of the electorate would still be against him. And regardl
>
> Kristallnacht 2012?
>
Worst.Concert.Ever.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-commu
I've been advocating that for years.
If a politician lies while campaigning, they should be removed from
the ballot. All campaign ads should be vetted for truth and absence
of spin and disinformation before being allowed on the air.
If they lie after elected, they should be removed from office.
I was talking about you. Your joking and glee at the assault is pure
brownshirt behavior. That's the amazing thing - your blatent condoning
of a physical assault simply because you disagreed with her. What's
next for you Kristallnacht 2012?
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> When di
He got elected by promising the kind of changes that aren't even really
possible for the President to do. I'm surprised more people didn't
realize that before the election. At any rate, near as the American
public can see, he's not even trying to implement those changes. There's
more corruption on
When did you complain about Gladney?
Got to love the selective outrage.
BTW, nobody said the guy was right to step on her.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> And that gives those brownshirts an excuse for assault?
>
> Simply amazing
>
~
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 1:29 PM, G Money wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Sisk, Kris wrote:
>
>>
>> That's not history being kind. That's people realizing that Obama made a
>> ton of promises that he either can't or won't fulfill. We've come to
>> expect that from politicians, but few o
> I would love to see an obsessively honest and fair group emerge, whose only
> driving purpose is truth and impartiality, like a modern priesthood of
> truth.
>
> Then turn those folk loose on politicians. Anyone found lying would be
> instantly disqualified from office.
>
> A. C'mon, imagine
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
>
> Yeah, they both are lying sacks of excrement.
>
> How does that help me, again?
>
> I would love to see an obsessively honest and fair group emerge, whose only
> driving purpose is truth and impartiality, like a modern priesthood of
> tru
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Sisk, Kris wrote:
>
> That's not history being kind. That's people realizing that Obama made a
> ton of promises that he either can't or won't fulfill. We've come to
> expect that from politicians, but few of them have promised the kinds of
> sweeping changes Oba
Yeah, they both are lying sacks of excrement.
How does that help me, again?
I would love to see an obsessively honest and fair group emerge, whose only
driving purpose is truth and impartiality, like a modern priesthood of
truth.
Then turn those folk loose on politicians. Anyone found lying wou
I think that saying the two parties are basically the same is a false
equivalence.
It's a way of excusing actions that really are a little more lame than
other actions.
It sucks that there are "sides" to things, but here we are. Forced to choose.
And like Rush says, even not making a choice is
That's not history being kind. That's people realizing that Obama made a
ton of promises that he either can't or won't fulfill. We've come to
expect that from politicians, but few of them have promised the kinds of
sweeping changes Obama did. Anyway, unfulfilled promises plus really not
a very goo
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:19 PM, C. Hatton Humphrey wrote:
>
> This paragraph sums the entire article up for me nicely:
> "Republicans accused Democrats of favoring cuts in Medicare benefits,
> while Democrats claimed their opponents would cut Social Security
> benefits. Republicans accused Democ
This paragraph sums the entire article up for me nicely:
"Republicans accused Democrats of favoring cuts in Medicare benefits,
while Democrats claimed their opponents would cut Social Security
benefits. Republicans accused Democrats of planning to unleash a huge
tax increase on ordinary families a
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo
