2004 3:57 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bin Laden shows his ugly face
> Jim wrote:
> But it's a good bet that those
> countries, while being unable to challenge the action reasonably would
have
> still failed to fully support it.
The way I view the situation, they were ready to
> Jim wrote:
> But it's a good bet that those
> countries, while being unable to challenge the action reasonably would have
> still failed to fully support it.
The way I view the situation, they were ready to commit, but wanted to
let the weapons inspectors finish. It seems to me that Mr. Bush
al
CTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 2:58 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bin Laden shows his ugly face
It's funny that I was accused of being able to read the mind of Bush
on another thread by Sam, yet, he is able to prognisticate what half
the world would do. :)
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:40:10
I believe by pointing this out you are now in violation of the Patriot Act. The next
knock on your door will be Sam and the Feds.
-Original Message-
From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 11:58 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bin Laden shows
It's funny that I was accused of being able to read the mind of Bush
on another thread by Sam, yet, he is able to prognisticate what half
the world would do. :)
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:40:10 -0600, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > If Iraq did
> Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If Iraq did have the WMDs and nuclear weapons and we
> had even more proof then we had last year, France,
> Russia and Germany still would not have supported the
> war. Most Arab nation still wouldn't have supported
> the war.
I had no idea you were on
> Ken Ketsdever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And we know this to be the case because you say so?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> If Iraq did have the WMDs and nuclear weapons and we
> had even more proof then we had last year, France,
> Russia and Germa
AIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 1:31 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Bin Laden shows his ugly face
America first and then the global community.
If Iraq did have the WMDs and nuclear weapons and we
had even more proof then we had last year, France,
Russia and Germany still would
: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 10:31 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Bin Laden shows his ugly face
America first and then the global community.
If Iraq did have the WMDs and nuclear weapons and we
had even more proof then we had last year, France,
Russia and Germany still would not have supported the
war
America first and then the global community.
If Iraq did have the WMDs and nuclear weapons and we
had even more proof then we had last year, France,
Russia and Germany still would not have supported the
war. Most Arab nation still wouldn't have supported
the war.
-sm
--- Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTE
-
From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 1:44 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Bin Laden shows his ugly face
--- Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That sentence clearly places the approval for action
> before world testament.
> We "d
[Sorry - list messages didn't come through for me today.]
First off I honestly (really) didn't ever mean to intimate that you, Sam were
"simple". I wrote the message after 3am and may have misspoke - there was truly
nothing personal in there. I apologize if it seemed like a shot.
I truly don'
L PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 8:59 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bin Laden shows his ugly face
We shouldn't have to "roughly predict". I agree with your assessment of
Kerry, but why can't he spell it out as coherently? The second he uttered
"global test",
--- Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That sentence clearly places the approval for action
> before world testament.
> We "did it" NOT "we're going to do it (if you
> approve)". The Republicans
> are painting the statement out of context and
> intimating Kerry suggested
> that the world com
We shouldn't have to "roughly predict". I agree with your assessment of
Kerry, but why can't he spell it out as coherently? The second he uttered
"global test", he should of had his criteria readyundecided voters don't
like roughly predicting.
So you are right that his words are being spun out
Just to make my position clear on all of this: I'm not at all pleased with
the way either candidate is spinning.
(I know... you're all dying for me to make my position clear. It's been
eating at you like a grub. "When is Jim finally going to clear things up so
I can get back to my life!" you moa
.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Munn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 7:30 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Bin Laden shows his ugly face
Bin Laden has now showed his ugly face in a new video, reminding US voters who our
real enemies are. We'll see how the story develops
> Sam wrote:
> Spin.
>
> He said "and you can prove to the world that you did
> it for legitimate reasons"
Ok, but I think if edit the tapes right he also says that he want to
hug Hussein.
~|
Purchase from House of Fusion, a Mac
Jim,
I understand and respect your decision. But I don't
agree.
You seem to trust spinsanity too much. When I read
that site I see most of it is against Bush with a few
mild digs against Kerry to make it look balanced.
I don't think it is. That's fine. But please don't
call me simple for not fol
-Original Message-
From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 1:19 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Bin Laden shows his ugly face
> Spin.
> He said "and you can prove to the world that you did
> it for legitimate reasons"
That sentence
Iraq shot at our planes everyday for years. On the eve
of Clintons impeachment he bombs Iraq. I think Saddam
might have laughed.
As for Somalia, remember Black Hawk Down?
Many believe that's what convinced Bin Laden that we
were weak and could easily be attacked in our
homeland.
-sm
--- Jim Da
it? Kerry voted
against that war. So what do you think he considers
proof?
--- Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 12:01 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Bin Lade
-Original Message-
From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 12:01 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bin Laden shows his ugly face
> I heard what he said clearly. You're trying to spin it
> but it won't work.
How could the statement, in fu
> Sam wrote:
> I heard what he said clearly. You're trying to spin it
> but it won't work.
No spin, here's the transcript:
LEHRER: What is your position on the whole concept of preemptive war?
KERRY: The president always has the right, and always has had the
right, for preemptive strike. That wa
I heard what he said clearly. You're trying to spin it
but it won't work.
--- Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sam wrote:
> > There's also the global approval comment
>
> If you listen to or read the comment in context it's
> clear that Mr.
> Kerry used the term "global" as a synonym
> Andy wrote:
> I my original response was that his experience operating a boat in a war 30
> years ago doesn't make him a better leader today. It should make it easier
> for him to relate to the troops, but this may be countered somewhat by his
> stand when he left the service.
It's a fact that
> Sam wrote:
> There's also the global approval comment
If you listen to or read the comment in context it's clear that Mr.
Kerry used the term "global" as a synonym for "all encompassing", not
"world wide".
The idea that he didn't is a flat out lie and you should stop perpetuating it.
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 12:36 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bin Laden shows his ugly face
> Andy wrote:
> just cause you back a paradigm that doesn't succeed
> doesn't make you a bad CEO. Most experiments fail.
When yo
iate
threat that required immediate engagement without a long-term or exit
strategy.
Jim Davis
-Original Message-
From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 2:38 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Bin Laden shows his ugly face
There's also the global approval
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 12:52 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Bin Laden shows his ugly face
>
> >I think Mr. Bush said it best today, "Americans
> will not be
> >intimidated or influenced by an enemy of our
> country. I'm sure
> Andy wrote:
> just cause you back a paradigm that doesn't succeed
> doesn't make you a bad CEO. Most experiments fail.
When you're diverting funds and resources from fully supporting your
bread and butter, it does make you a bad CEO. Exploring adjacencies
is fine, just make sure your main line
Gruss,
You've logic doesn't flow and none of it has anything to do with an MBA --
which is about as far away from the factory floor as you can get.
Your first statement starts at the self-evident and moves quickly to
fallacies. Growth doesn't always take time, but does take a market and
distribut
the truism I like is: nothing happens until somebody sells something.
In other words, all those inconvenient nitty-gritty details like
product *do* matter.
Dana
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 12:51:30 -0500, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Andy wrote:
> > Then he should rejoin the military at a l
I fail to see why Bush would be the default choice. He has yet to
catch the guy after all. But I agree, let us not give this asshole
legitimacy.
Dana
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 00:51:40 -0400, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I think Mr. Bush said it best today, "Americans will not be
> >intim
> Andy wrote:
> Then he should rejoin the military at a lower level. The Best CEO's are not
> those that know how to work the lathe.
What school did you get your MBA from?
The best CEOs are the ones that know the business, understand that
growth takes time and partnerships, and can manage at eac
Then he should rejoin the military at a lower level. The Best CEO's are not
those that know how to work the lathe.
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 12:28 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bin Laden shows his ugly face
: Saturday, October 30, 2004 1:28 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bin Laden shows his ugly face
> Jim wrote:
> As far as terrorism goes I actually see very little difference between the
> candidates. Lots of hunting, lots of killing.
The difference is that Mr. Kerry has personally hunte
> Jim wrote:
> As far as terrorism goes I actually see very little difference between the
> candidates. Lots of hunting, lots of killing.
The difference is that Mr. Kerry has personally hunted and killed
humans before, so he has a better instinct for what works and what
doesn't.
M
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bin Laden shows his ugly face
>I think Mr. Bush said it best today, "Americans will not be
>intimidated or influenced by an enemy of our country. I'm sure Senator
>Kerry agrees with this."
>
>We should do nothing to indicate that Bin Lad
> Robert wrote:
> But we have a few local issues in San Diego
Do you do any biking? I've heard San Diego is great for it and
supports biking to work, etc. I haven't been there in awhile though -
any truth?
~|
Purchase from Hous
>I think Mr. Bush said it best today, "Americans will not be
>intimidated or influenced by an enemy of our country. I'm sure Senator
>Kerry agrees with this."
>
>We should do nothing to indicate that Bin Laden has any influence in any way.
Agreed. What I am suggesting is that the appearance of thi
> Robert wrote:
> Bin Laden has now showed his ugly face. it could be lights out for John Kerry.
It could be, or it could remind people that Bin Laden is still at large.
Either way I hope that nobody changes their mind due to this guy - if
they do, and polls show it, it will be a victory for Bi
Bin Laden has now showed his ugly face in a new video, reminding US voters who our
real enemies are. We'll see how the story develops over the last couple of days before
the election, but it looks like it could be lights out for John Kerry. All the polls
show Bush up by 15-20 points in who peopl
43 matches
Mail list logo
