I think the difference is in the rule of law. With Anarchism and
Libertarianism there is no moderation of the rule by the strong.
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:28 PM, denstar wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>>
>> Like libertarianism, which is the right wing version
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> As for being free birds, I'm rather doubtful. Free to respond
> possibly. Free in the way you mean it, doubtful. People are just too
> easily manipulated. Moreover all to often they will put the chains on
> themselves and ask you to order
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> Like libertarianism, which is the right wing version of Anarchism, it
> leads only to rule by the strong for the strong. If you have no
> problem with some thug with a gun telling you what to do then go for
> it.
It's always somebody tell
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 1:46 AM, denstar wrote:
>
>> Seemed more like you cast aspersions on the entire profession.
>
> I was good friends with a NYC sanitation cop years ago. To think
> someone would want to steal it. Really liked him. I should see
rong by the strong.
Frankly I can see advantages and disadvantages over what we currently
have with either one.
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 10:13 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Anarchy (was Re: Insane GOP opposition
As for being free birds, I'm rather doubtful. Free to respond
possibly. Free in the way you mean it, doubtful. People are just too
easily manipulated. Moreover all to often they will put the chains on
themselves and ask you to order them about.
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 1:01 AM, denstar wrote:
>
>
Like libertarianism, which is the right wing version of Anarchism, it
leads only to rule by the strong for the strong. If you have no
problem with some thug with a gun telling you what to do then go for
it.
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 1:01 AM, denstar wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Jer
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 1:46 AM, denstar wrote:
> Seemed more like you cast aspersions on the entire profession.
I was good friends with a NYC sanitation cop years ago. To think
someone would want to steal it. Really liked him. I should see if he's
on facebook.
> Who are we to tell other peopl
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 10:33 PM, denstar wrote:
>
It seemed like you were judging garbage men.
>>>
>>> No it didn't
>>
>> Did so! =)p
>
> I was judging the author
Seemed more like you cast aspersions on the entire profession.
>>> I didn't sa
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 10:33 PM, denstar wrote:
>>> It seemed like you were judging garbage men.
>>
>> No it didn't
>
> Did so! =)p
I was judging the author
>> I didn't say I was better than him. I said I couldn't be happy as an
>> unskilled laborer.
>
> Oh come now. Ye went a damn sight fu
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 5:53 PM, denstar wrote:
>>
>> It seemed like you were judging garbage men.
>
> No it didn't
Did so! =)p
>> It not you being happy with your lot-- it's you taking shit regarding
>> other people's.
>
> I didn't say I was bet
Sam - I am with you on the NY style pizza. I prefer it to Chicago
style pizza, but that does not mean, to me, that Chicago style pizza
is bad.
That being said, I would put the best NY style pizza up against the
best Chicago style pizza and bet on the NY style any day of the week
and twice on Sund
Now now. I wouldn't call Chicago pizza lovers stupid. You just have poor taste.
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> Unless it is Chicago style pizza of course heheheh
>
>
>
> It felt to me like you were knocking people for being different than
-Original Message-
Unless it is Chicago style pizza of course heheheh
It felt to me like you were knocking people for being different than
yourself.
That somebody likes a different kind of food than myself doesn't make
them stupid or underachievers.
Just different.
And I'm fine with
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 5:53 PM, denstar wrote:
>
> It seemed like you were judging garbage men.
No it didn't
> It not you being happy with your lot-- it's you taking shit regarding
> other people's.
I didn't say I was better than him. I said I couldn't be happy as an
unskilled laborer.
> The
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 3:21 PM, denstar wrote:
>>
>> Screw that noise. Refuse management is *super* important.
>>
>> I respect that, and those that perform a thing that I need.
>>
>> Sounds like you take stuff for granted. Isn't that part of "the
...and I am really missing it here in Batesville...not a decent slice of
pizza to be found hehehe
-Original Message-
From: Medic [mailto:hofme...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2010 3:27 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Insane GOP opposition to repealing tax cuts
Chicago Style
W00t!
-Original Message-
From: Medic [mailto:hofme...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2010 3:27 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Insane GOP opposition to repealing tax cuts
Chicago Style Pizza?
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Is there anything about Ame
gt;
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2010 2:50 PM
> > To: cf-community
> > Subject: Re: Insane GOP opposition to repealing tax cuts
> >
> >
> > Speak for yourself.
>
>
st 15, 2010 2:50 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Insane GOP opposition to repealing tax cuts
>
>
> Speak for yourself.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-An
Just because you don't want to admit it doesn't make it not true...
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2010 2:50 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Insane GOP opposition to repealing tax cuts
Speak for yourself.
On Sun, Aug 15,
Speak for yourself.
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> I think you need to look around a bit more Sam...that does represent
> America.
>
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.co
I think you need to look around a bit more Sam...that does represent
America.
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2010 1:55 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Insane GOP opposition to repealing tax cuts
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 12:43 PM
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> It seems to me that you saw the article as attacking the American way
> of life and you immediately became defensive, without really
> comprehending the article at all.
No, I saw it as a comical representation of a country. You do realize
if hal
"Point from that article was we're not happy because we work hard and
full time. "
That was not the point of the article.
The points raised in the article are,inter alia:
1) Denmark has the highest reported happiness index of any country in the world.
2) Denmark also has one of the highest tax
I would hardly call that an easy job...
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2010 12:08 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Insane GOP opposition to repealing tax cuts
Abstraction again?
We are talking about his career standards remember
Abstraction again?
We are talking about his career standards remember?
Yeah he has an easy job and makes friends and that's fine.
It's not the standards to rate a country by.
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Medic wrote:
>> You don't think he has lower standards?
>
> You have absolutely NO ide
>
> Talk about language abstraction, I had no idea you were referring
> to programming :)
>
Go back and read the sentence. It's not cryptic.
> As another note, I probably write more PL/SQL than cf these days but I
> do see your point.
>
Me too!
> You don't think he has lower standards?
You h
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> Ya, I was pointing out the irony about your statement compared to the fact
> that you have chosen CF, the easiest of all the languages. You seemed to
> think I was commenting on how you speak.
Talk about language abstraction, I had no idea you w
>
> > Totally unrelated to the discussion so yea. Nice attack glad to see you
> came back to the discussion at hand.
>
Ya, I was pointing out the irony about your statement compared to the fact
that you have chosen CF, the easiest of all the languages. You seemed to
think I was commenting on how
Let him stop picking up garbage and we will see just how little he does to
help his community...
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2010 10:27 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Insane GOP opposition to repealing tax cuts
On Sun, Aug 15
Point from that article was we're not happy because we work hard and
full time. If they interview two people for the article and one is a
part time worker that puts no effort into his work they are doing the
country a disservice.
All the happy people in Denmark and they chose him to represent
happ
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> Um, I said abstraction, not abstract. Speed reading again Sam?
Totally unrelated to the discussion so yea. Nice attack glad to see
you came back to the discussion at hand.
> Happiness is subjective Sam. One mans 25 hour a week garbage run is an
So if neither of these is true, then what on earth is your point
regarding the amount of hours that this man works, and his sense of
achievement and happiness?
And then what comparison are you drawing between the value system
regarding work of the US, as defined by yourself, and that described
in
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> So you believe that a job should be the most important thing in someone's
> life.
Never said that and never thought that.
> And anyone not working 9 or 10 hour days cannot be contributing to Society,
> and is a leech and a drain on society.
N
It's really only since the fall of Rome that the idea of hard work was seen
as a good thing. The goal was always to work less and think more. To expand
the creative and philosophical mind through the arts, music, theatre,
debate, discussion and discovery. I've always thought it was a shame that we
Um, I said abstraction, not abstract. Speed reading again Sam?
Happiness is subjective Sam. One mans 25 hour a week garbage run is another
mans 40 hour a week cf job. The point is, if he's happy doing
a necessary job then he's a success in HIS life. If you're happy with your
not-so-necessary job
So you believe that a job should be the most important thing in someone's life.
And anyone not working 9 or 10 hour days cannot be contributing to Society,
and is a leech and a drain on society.
You believe that Achievement equates wholly and solely to gains made
in the workplace, whether as an e
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> The article mentions the man was happy having more time with his kids,
> more time to coach his daughter's handball team etc.
> So there are other things , more important to him than his job, which
> make him happy.
>
> Yet you belittle that;didn
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> Weird that you are talking about being challenged yet you write in the least
> complicated abstraction language there is. ;p
And your advanced language skills put me to shame.
> I just wonder why you are ragging on a garbage man saying he's an
The article mentions the man was happy having more time with his kids,
more time to coach his daughter's handball team etc.
So there are other things , more important to him than his job, which
make him happy.
Yet you belittle that;didn't read it; or intentionally ignore it to
make a poiint. Or y
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 3:21 PM, denstar wrote:
>
> Screw that noise. Refuse management is *super* important.
>
> I respect that, and those that perform a thing that I need.
>
> Sounds like you take stuff for granted. Isn't that part of "the
> problem" with society today?
When writing an artic
Weird that you are talking about being challenged yet you write in the least
complicated abstraction language there is. ;p
I just wonder why you are ragging on a garbage man saying he's an
under achiever and doesn't like being challenged? Sounds pretty elitist to
me. Also sounds like you are jump
You don't ever get anything do you? I 'll have to explain it so even
you can understand. Some people are happy just slinking by while
others need to do more to be happy. A sense of personal pride, not
ego. I'm not happy just getting by, just doing enough to get the
paycheck, how about you?
On Sa
I am happy. My metrics for happiness are obviously much higher than yours :)
Like I said, some people are happy not being challenged and just
getting by. That would drive me crazy.
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> Wow. You don't think being happy with your life, whether garbag
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Garbageman is either an under achiever or no other options. Many
> people like non-thinking jobs. Not me.
Screw that noise. Refuse management is *super* important.
I respect that, and those that perform a thing that I need.
Sounds like you take
BTW, nice how you turned that into me being a hater. Good work there
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> And right there we see the societal differences that the article
> highlighted between countries such as America, and Denmark.
>
>
It's only the dream if she is a Vampire slayer ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Zaphod Beeblebrox [mailto:zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2010 9:08 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Insane GOP opposition to repealing tax cuts
Ahh the great American ide
Ahh the great American ideal of happiness- a McMansion, 3 bmws in the driveway,
a wife named Buffy, 2 kids and more money than you can spend...we really are
miserable!
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 14, 2010, at 1:15 PM, denstar wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Sam wrote:
> ...
>> A
Garbageman is either an under achiever or no other options. Many
people like non-thinking jobs. Not me.
The longshorman job I was talking about was a do-no-work job since all
the work moved out of NYC. Read the paper, play cards and cash the
check.
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Eric Roberts
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Sam wrote:
...
> A guy works five hours a day collecting garbage and he rates his
> happiness eight of of ten. If only my standards were so low.
The Greatest Gift is Life, esse!
:DeN
--
If you are a prince, and I am a prince, who will wash the camels?
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "Still, it's a bonus to be able to form like Voltron when needed."
>
> Are you on drugs?
>
> If so, give me some :)
>
Sure! I always try to bring enough for the rest of the class.
If there's not enough, we can form a little private group,
Wow. You don't think being happy with your life, whether garbage man,
longshoreman or CF coder, isn't the highest level achievement?
That's horribly sad.
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> Point is some people are happy being under-achievers. I think it's
> nothing to brag about.
And right there we see the societal differences that the article
highlighted between countries such as America, and Denmark.
On 14 August 2010 11:51, Eric Roberts wrote:
>
> So you are saying that just because someone is a garbageman or a longshorman
> they are underachievers?
~
So you are saying that just because someone is a garbageman or a longshorman
they are underachievers?
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2010 11:48 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Insane GOP opposition to repealing tax cuts
Point is
Point is some people are happy being under-achievers. I think it's
nothing to brag about.
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> So in Denmark you'd go do something else because that didn't make you happy.
> And the State would probably pay for you to retrain as well.
>
> What's you
So in Denmark you'd go do something else because that didn't make you happy.
And the State would probably pay for you to retrain as well.
What's your point?
On 14 August 2010 10:59, Sam wrote:
>
> The fact that we all are constantly learning to stay working much more
> than five hours a day mus
The fact that we all are constantly learning to stay working much more
than five hours a day must mean we're all greedy in your eyes.
They do say happiness is bliss.
Thinking back, I was offered a job as a longshorman in NYC 30 years
ago when the work was winding down. If I took it I would have
Don't confuse greed with high standards.
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Did you read it?
> A guy works five hours a day collecting garbage and he rates his
> happiness eight of of ten. If only my standards were so low.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Maureen wrote:
> >
"Still, it's a bonus to be able to form like Voltron when needed."
Are you on drugs?
If so, give me some :)
J
-
Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms those entrusted with
power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny -
Thomas Jefferson on government
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
...
> "Full anarchy for everyone?"
>
> I can see the benefits of anarchy more and more every day.
I say anarchy is all there /really/ is.
Perhaps people can be effectively chained, but total chainage is just
im-poseeb-lay.
We are free birds,
"So Reagan was a tax and spend liberal. "
If you say so. I never said that.
"Excellent. What should we replace the income tax with? Nothing? "
A national sales tax.
"Full anarchy for everyone?"
I can see the benefits of anarchy more and more every day.
"You told me we need taxes but y
Amen. Finally something we can agree on.
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
> The income tax should be abolished altogether. No need for brackets.
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "Marginal tax rates are lower, in the US, for every bracket now than they
> were under Reagan. So lets start there. Should tax rates be returned to what
> they were under Reagan. If not, why not?"
>
> Lord no.
>
> The income tax should be a
"Marginal tax rates are lower, in the US, for every bracket now than they
were under Reagan. So lets start there. Should tax rates be returned to what
they were under Reagan. If not, why not?"
Lord no.
The income tax should be abolished altogether. No need for brackets.
J
-
Experience hath
PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Insane GOP opposition to repealing tax cuts
"Well, of course you can. Have you ever seen a prosperous country without
taxe"
I don't just mean taxes. I mean high taxes. The larger the better.
Look at all of the successful countries with tax r
Did you read it?
A guy works five hours a day collecting garbage and he rates his
happiness eight of of ten. If only my standards were so low.
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Don't spoil his delusion that Europe is a socialist over-taxed cesspool.
> No one on that side of th
Don't spoil his delusion that Europe is a socialist over-taxed cesspool.
No one on that side of the issue wants to hear any reality about taxes. If
you take away the "read my lips, no new taxes" rhetoric, then they also lose
all their scapegoating and finger-pointing, and vilification opportunitie
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "Well, of course you can. Have you ever seen a prosperous country without
> taxe"
>
> I don't just mean taxes. I mean high taxes. The larger the better.
>
> Look at all of the successful countries with tax rates out of the
> stratosphere
you mean like the "Happiest Country in the World"
http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=4086092&page=1
On Aug 13, 2010, at 3:01 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "Well, of course you can. Have you ever seen a prosperous country without
> taxe"
>
> I don't just mean taxes. I mean high taxes. The l
"Well, of course you can. Have you ever seen a prosperous country without
taxe"
I don't just mean taxes. I mean high taxes. The larger the better.
Look at all of the successful countries with tax rates out of the
stratosphere.
J
-
Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms thos
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "No way! What we need is more taxes, sugar! Bill baby bill!"
>
> Everybody knows you can tax your way to prosperity.
Well, of course you can. Have you ever seen a prosperous country without taxe
"No way! What we need is more taxes, sugar! Bill baby bill!"
Everybody knows you can tax your way to prosperity.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/d
No way! What we need is more taxes, sugar! Bill baby bill!
:Den
--
If I am given a formula, and I am ignorant of its meaning, it cannot
teach me anything, but if I already know it, what does the formula
teach me?
St. Augustine
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> THE UNSPENT STIMU
The unspent money has been allocated. We have to pay it back even if
it's not spent.
If you take out a loan and put it in the bank you still need to pay
back the loan.
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Ok, you obviously don't get the idea of unspent money. So what do you not
Ok, you obviously don't get the idea of unspent money. So what do you not
want them to spend the unspent money on? Education, infrastructure, war,
immigration, housing, propaganda, or something else? Or is even that
question beyond your comprehension?
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Sam wro
THE UNSPENT STIMULUS MONEY! for starters
If we don't spend the money we don't need to make cuts to cover the cost.
Then there's the trillions for Obama care. Don't spend the money and
we don't need to cut other things. Then start cutting salaries in
Washington.
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:07 PM,
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> So we didn't even start to pay the $Trillion health care bill yet we
> can't pay our existing bills. You do know we will have to pay that
> health care bill very soon?
Because of 2012?
> The stimulus money that was paid back is being spent on new
So I repeat my question. Of the money actually being spent, what you cut?
Not the source, the actual expenditure.
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> So we didn't even start to pay the $Trillion health care bill yet we
> can't pay our existing bills. You do know we will have to p
So we didn't even start to pay the $Trillion health care bill yet we
can't pay our existing bills. You do know we will have to pay that
health care bill very soon?
The stimulus money that was paid back is being spent on new pork. The
unspent money should be sent back and used to to pay down the d
Very little has been spent on health care, so the one trillion dollar health
care figure is pure fantasy. Unspent stimulus money is "unspent". You have
difficulty with that concept, or just refuse to believe anything non-Rovian?
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> So we didn't act
I knew you would like it :P
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Entertaining would not be the word I would use unless if by "entertaining"
> you mean "what a load of crap..."
>
> Eric
>
~|
Order the Adobe
Entertaining would not be the word I would use unless if by "entertaining"
you mean "what a load of crap..."
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 9:23 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Insane GOP opposition t
So we didn't actually spend the $3 trillion?
Time to pay some bills.
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Maureen wrote:
>
> No, I'm saying money that has actually be allocated to be spent, not these
> pie in the sky "projections" that he is pulling out of his nether regions.
>
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2
No, I'm saying money that has actually be allocated to be spent, not these
pie in the sky "projections" that he is pulling out of his nether regions.
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> He just mentioned $2-1/2 trillion that should not have been spent.
>
> Are you saying "starting .
He just mentioned $2-1/2 trillion that should not have been spent.
Are you saying "starting ... Now!"
Or are you saying the money is already spent so what are you going to
cut to pay for it?
You do realize it won't matter because they will keep spending. It's
like blaming the utility companies f
Hey Karl,
Instead of throwing out a bunch of spin about unspent money, could you
actually tell us what you think should be cut from current spending? You
know, the stuff that is actually in the budget.
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 6:22 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> Here's a start:
>
> Voters know it is Mr.
Ok. Answer that.
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 5:10 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "Curious as to which spending being done by the current administration you
> think should be cut. Be specific."
>
> It might be easier to ask me which ones they should keep.
>
> J
>
~~
Here's a start:
Voters know it is Mr. Obama and Democratic leaders who approved a $410
billion supplemental (complete with 8,500 earmarks) in the middle of
the last fiscal year, and then passed a record-spending budget for
this one. Mr. Obama and Democrats approved an $862 billion stimulus
and a
Which ones should they keep?
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "Curious as to which spending being done by the current administration you
> think should be cut. Be specific."
>
> It might be easier to ask me which ones they should keep.
>
> J
>
> -
>
> Experience hath s
"Curious as to which spending being done by the current administration you
think should be cut. Be specific."
It might be easier to ask me which ones they should keep.
J
-
Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms those entrusted with
power have, in time, and by slow operations, p
Not the bombers! They're mandated.
The schools tho... well, they ain't. Or something like that.
It's related to why we don't have a standing army, I think.
;-]
:Den
--
...mathematical proofs, like diamonds, are hard and clear, and will be
touched with nothing but strict reasoning.
Locke, J
LOL
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Emo Kid wrote:
>
>>You had me at "Insane GOP"
>
> You had me at "cuts".
>
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/
Sorry.. I missed the word not when I read your post.
Curious as to which spending being done by the current administration you
think should be cut. Be specific.
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> That's why I said "the not so fiscally conservative Bush Administration".
"Bush was many things. Fiscally conservative was not among them. Even the
conservatives will agree with me on that."
Exactly.
That's why I said "the not so fiscally conservative Bush Administration".
When you make the Bush Administration spending look weak, you're are
accomplishing something.
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> It's an easy argument to make when the Obama administration announced that
> the July deficit was 165 billion dollars. That is more than the deficit
> for
> the entire year 2007 under the not so fiscally conservative Bush
> administration
It may be an easy one, but it's not an honest one...
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Barnes [mailto:critic...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 12:16 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Insane GOP opposition to repealing tax cuts
"On the one hand they blame Obama's
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> On the one hand they blame Obama's government for the deficit
> situation, and talk at length about what must be done to reduce the
> deficit..
Yes, it's very important.
> But they are firmly against repealing tax cuts on the rich.
Obviously yo
"On the one hand they blame Obama's government for the deficit situation,
and talk at length about what must be done to reduce the deficit.."
It's an easy argument to make when the Obama administration announced that
the July deficit was 165 billion dollars. That is more than the deficit for
the
So they bitch about Obama being too socialist, yet they want to be more like
a communist dictatorship? Huh?
-Original Message-
From: Vivec [mailto:gel21...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 9:37 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Insane GOP opposition to repealing tax cuts
On the
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
