"*shrug*...whatever helps you sleep at night, Jerry. Take care."
Amen. And same to you.
J
-
Ninety percent of politicians give the other ten percent a bad reputation.
- Henry Kissinger
Politicians are people who, when they see light at the end of the tunnel,
go out and buy some more tunnel.
"Yeah, cause the conservatives on this list are such sweet, polite little
boys that never insult anyone."
Please point out an example of me insulting anyone.
Unless you mean disagreeing with someone, which is often seen as an insult
in progressive circles.
J
-
Ninety percent of politicians g
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "I think what genius is trying to say is agree with me no matter how stupid
> it sounds or I will insult you!"
>
> That seems to be a running theme, especially with those with a progressive
> tilt.
>
*shrug*...whatever helps you sleep at n
Given the attitudes of many of that occupant's party, I am sure that
if Obama, as a senator, had been invited, they would have preferred it
to be the back door.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Not even close. There is so much stuff that the President deals with
> that a juni
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 6:12 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Maureen wrote:
>>
>> Because I get weary of a few people who insist that they are always
>> right and the other side is always wrong.
>
> FYI, you are one of those people.
No. I'm not. But you think I am because
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Because I get weary of a few people who insist that they are always
> right and the other side is always wrong.
FYI, you are one of those people.
> I don't really like either side. I am tired of the spin,
> disinformation, distorted opinions
I know you're not talking about me, because that would make me
paranoid. I do wonder who though. Doesn't matter, but it does appear
that you are defending progressives...again.
I'm not passing judgement, just tell you how things look from here.
Because I know how much you hate the label thingy.
.
I knew it...lol
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 5:44 AM, GMoney wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> >
> > my apologies then, I guess. Maybe I just think that because your opinions
> > tend to correlate with stuff I see there. More than mine, anyway. So I
> will
> > shut up now
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> my apologies then, I guess. Maybe I just think that because your opinions
> tend to correlate with stuff I see there. More than mine, anyway. So I will
> shut up now and let G tell you what the hell he's talking about then. If he
> so chooses.
>
amamaur...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 8:41 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Limbaugh is voice of GOP majority?
>
>
> Not even close. There is so much stuff that the President deals with that a
> junior senator would never be privy to, especially since Obama was
Did you see the committees he was on?
-Original Message-
From: Maureen [mailto:mamamaur...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 8:41 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Limbaugh is voice of GOP majority?
Not even close. There is so much stuff that the President deals with that a
Because I get weary of a few people who insist that they are always
right and the other side is always wrong.
I don't really like either side. I am tired of the spin,
disinformation, distorted opinions and outright lies on both sides.
So how is that polarizing?
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:30 PM,
Gah. The polarization drives me nuts. Why do we justify everything with a
"you do it too" mentality.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Yeah, cause the conservatives on this list are such sweet, polite
> little boys that never insult anyone.
>
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:30 P
Yeah, cause the conservatives on this list are such sweet, polite
little boys that never insult anyone.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "I think what genius is trying to say is agree with me no matter how stupid
> it sounds or I will insult you!"
>
> That seems to be a r
"I think what genius is trying to say is agree with me no matter how stupid
it sounds or I will insult you!"
That seems to be a running theme, especially with those with a progressive
tilt.
J
-
One of the surprising privileges of intellectuals is that they are free to
be scandalously asinine
Not even close. There is so much stuff that the President deals with
that a junior senator would never be privy to, especially since Obama
was senator when an opposition party controlled the White House. I
doubt they even let him visit the West Wing.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Eric Robert
the time, they do have it completely right.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 4:00 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Limbaugh is voice of GOP majority?
>
>
> Eh. I frequently agree with Eric and t
-
From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 4:00 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Limbaugh is voice of GOP majority?
Eh. I frequently agree with Eric and think that his core beliefs are good.
He wants truth, justice and the American way ;) He probably should
ROFL...you got me there G lol
-Original Message-
From: GMoney [mailto:gm0n3...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 3:36 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Limbaugh is voice of GOP majority?
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com>
And there you have it folks. Peas in a pod. Dana, Eric and Judah all
think the same. You left out Larry.
.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> Eh. I frequently agree with Eric and think that his core beliefs are good.
> He wants truth, justice and the American way ;) He probably
Eh. I frequently agree with Eric and think that his core beliefs are good.
He wants truth, justice and the American way ;) He probably should
exercise a little impulse control about hitting reply and spouting off on
things he "knows" to be true is all.
I think one of the reasons that Judah's opi
I'd like to think you are right. But I don't, though. I think he decided
that the people who are locked up there are not worth the political
fallout. But we all lose when people are locked up due to ignorance and
can't be released lest the ignorance be exposed. I think the US military
has gotten m
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> Wouldn't candidate Obama, who was also a US Senator, have also been privy
> to
> most, if not all, of the information that he is privy to as the President?
>
>
No.
He doesn't learn the truth about Roswell
[mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 3:09 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Limbaugh is voice of GOP majority?
>
>
> Obama started the process of looking for options on where to move the
> prisoners in the federal judicial system. The hue and cry raised by
Nairobi condemning
corruption within the Kenyan government.[88]
-Original Message-
From: GMoney [mailto:gm0n3...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 3:13 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Limbaugh is voice of GOP majority?
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
...@wiredotter.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 3:09 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Limbaugh is voice of GOP majority?
Obama started the process of looking for options on where to move the
prisoners in the federal judicial system. The hue and cry raised by members
of Congress was so close to universal
If I remember correctly, Republicans defunded any efforts to close Gitmo...
-Original Message-
From: GMoney [mailto:gm0n3...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 3:00 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Limbaugh is voice of GOP majority?
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Dana wrote
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 4:13 PM, GMoney wrote:
>
> Candidate Obama knew all of those political hurdles...so why did he still
> promise to do it? Did he underestimate it? Or perhaps never really intend
> on going through with it?
He wanted to win
> I guess i'm giving him a little bit more credi
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> Obama started the process of looking for options on where to move the
> prisoners in the federal judicial system. The hue and cry raised by
> members of Congress was so close to universal that they realized that
> there is no way in hell
Obama started the process of looking for options on where to move the
prisoners in the federal judicial system. The hue and cry raised by
members of Congress was so close to universal that they realized that
there is no way in hell that they would be allowed to do it. Bills
were being drafted disa
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> I have to agree with you there. It was one of the reasons I was tempted to
> make the comparison in the last administration. I realize that there was
> significant (stupid) opposition to closing it but if Obama can institute
> martial law by decre
I have to agree with you there. It was one of the reasons I was tempted to
make the comparison in the last administration. I realize that there was
significant (stupid) opposition to closing it but if Obama can institute
martial law by decree, I'm not quite sure why he can't just say you know
what
I think what genius is trying to say is agree with me no matter how
stupid it sounds or I will insult you!
It works to some extent, not many dare to dispute lunacy on this list anymore.
.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> Jerry, I know that you, unlike Sam, have at leas
Jerry, I know that you, unlike Sam, have at least rudiments of logic
and math training. Please go back through the numbers I posted and
explain where the logic is incorrect if you disagree with my
conclusions.
As for the "Lies can only come Republicans" line..what bullshit. Come
on, I'd like to t
"Only you could find good news in a $460 billion increase Still makes it a
lie doesn't it?"
Of course not. Lies can only come from Republicans.
J
-
Ninety percent of politicians give the other ten percent a bad reputation.
- Henry Kissinger
Politicians are people who, when they see light at
I never claimed to be a democrat. I think most of them are no different
than republicans.
-Original Message-
From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 12:32 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Limbaugh is voice of GOP majority?
Can we please stop
More like George Michael dunking on Pee-Wee
.
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 1:40 PM, GMoney wrote:
>
> Man+100.
>
> Can't put enough zeroes on there.
>
> Course, Judah punking Eric is kind of like Michael Jordan dunking on
> Pee-wee Herman.
>
~
Only you could find good news in a $460 billion increase
Still makes it a lie doesn't it?
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> It might also be worth mentioning the further cherry picking of the numbers:
>
> Gross costs (of just the insurance provisions) have gone up from
Man+100.
Can't put enough zeroes on there.
Course, Judah punking Eric is kind of like Michael Jordan dunking on
Pee-wee Herman.
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> Can we please stop with the Nazi references? Politically-motivated
> economic studies are pretty co
Can we please stop with the Nazi references? Politically-motivated
economic studies are pretty common, as is picking and choosing the
numbers you publicize. Lies, damned lies and Statistics and all that.
Propaganda was not invented in Nazi Germany.
And next time you get the urge to compare Republ
o proud of Republicans.
-Original Message-
From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 11:49 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Limbaugh is voice of GOP majority?
Of course Jerry is wrong about the CBO numbers. Given that he gets them from
Republican press relea
It might also be worth mentioning the further cherry picking of the numbers:
Gross costs (of just the insurance provisions) have gone up from 940
billion (10 years from 2010) to 1,760 billion (10 years from 2012) but
Net costs (of just the insurance provisions) have gone up from 790
billion to 1,
Of course Jerry is wrong about the CBO numbers. Given that he gets
them from Republican press releases, quell surprise!
Here is the actual CBO piece:
http://cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/attachments/03-13-Coverage%20Estimates.pdf
What Republicans said: They claimed that the original 10 ye
"My argument is perfectly reasoned, and your comment below proves my point
exactly. "
If you say so.
"You called the president a liar based on the headline of an opinion piece
about numbers purportedly released by the CBO"
He is a liar based on the numbers released by the CBO.
"None of thos
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "Better than what? "
>
> I thought you were a little more reasoned than some of the less than
> conservative readers. Apparently not. My mistake.
My argument is perfectly reasoned, and your comment below proves my
point exactly. You cal
"Better than what? "
I thought you were a little more reasoned than some of the less than
conservative readers. Apparently not. My mistake.
"Even an article "describing" the CBO calculation isn't proof, and the CBO
calculations change with the wind."
Amazing how CBO numbers are proof when Ob
"Jerry, She's flustered again."
Of couse she is. There are no lies and the reason for the hate is obvious.
Anyway, she wants me to spend my time digging around looking for something
that doesn't exists.
I don't think so.
J
-
Ninety percent of politicians give the other ten percent a bad rep
"I wonder how much money they could save if the candidates didn't have to hop
from state to state in such a random matter. I am sure there is a reason
for it (keeping up the suspense? $), Right before the SC primary, he was
right here. He could have been in Charlotte in 30 minutes. Seems like a
Jerry,
She's flustered again.
FYI, she doesn't like that and will never admit to it.
.
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> no you don't but you're clearly determined not to. I sent you what she
> said, and what he said she said. If you can't see the rather stunning
> difference, th
no you don't but you're clearly determined not to. I sent you what she
said, and what he said she said. If you can't see the rather stunning
difference, there's no point in talking to you at all. In fact, lemme send
you to join Sam in the land of email filters.
D
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 8:05 AM,
Better than what? Headlines aren't proof of anything. They are
usually the opinion of the headline writer. Even an article
"describing" the CBO calculation isn't proof, and the CBO calculations
change with the wind.
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "A 'headline'? From
> "It is why I voted in the Republican primary. I care who the Republicans
> offer as a candidate."
>
> The primary in NC is so late, it won't matter. The issue will be resolved.
>
> I'll probably write in my choice for President when November gets here.
>
> J
I wonder how much money they could
'This *almost* sounds like 'well, everyone else does it too!'
I hate that argument.
My goal in pointing out an example such as this is not to indicate that it
is okay for someone to lie because everyone else does it. It is to say
that others who lie should be held to the same standard. That is
Breitbart was not a reporter any more than Limbaugh is.
As for the rest of it, have you compared the edited and unedited versions?
If \you have and you don't think the result was a lie, I really don't know
what to say to you. Except Ciao.
"No point in prolonging this."
Amen.
You hated Breitbar
"A 'headline'? From where? And since when does a "headline" constitute
fact or proof of anything other than the headline writer's opinion?"
Maureen, I thought you were better than this. It was a headline to an
article describing the CBO's new calculation of cost.
J
-
Ninety percent of polit
On 3/13/2012 9:46 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> You seen the new headline?
>
> Obamacare to cost $1.76 trillion over 10 yrs
>
> Gee, what did the "liar" in chief say? Maybe it was: Now, add it all up,
> and the plan I'm proposing will cost around $900 billion over 10 years .
>
> That's a little m
Breitbart was not a reporter any more than Limbaugh is.
As for the rest of it, have you compared the edited and unedited versions?
If \you have and you don't think the result was a lie, I really don't know
what to say to you. Except Ciao. No point in prolonging this.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 6:46
A "headline"? From where? And since when does a "headline"
constitute fact or proof of anything other than the headline writer's
opinion?
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
> You seen the new headline?
>
> Obamacare to cost $1.76 trillion over 10 yrs
>
>
> Gee, what did the
"If we can accuse him of #2, by your own admission, then we can accuse him
of lying. "
By that definition, everyone in DC is a liar, including King Obama. And I
had no "admission". I told Dana that she may have an argument for
misleading. I didn't say he was misleading.
You seen the new he
it depends on how far you can stretch your definition I guess. At some
point its stretched beyond all recognition.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:18 PM, PT wrote:
>
> Here seems to be the problem. I believe the definition of lying is
> unclear to some.
>
> Tell me you aren't serious, Jerry.
>
> Fro
Here seems to be the problem. I believe the definition of lying is
unclear to some.
Tell me you aren't serious, Jerry.
From Merriam-Webster:
lie
1: to make an untrue statement with intent to deceive
2: to create a false or misleading impression
If we can accuse him of #2, by your own admis
You are delusional.
You never seem win a discussion but always come back six months or a
year later with your own version of how the convo went.
.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> I went through the transcripts almost line by line right here on this list
> at the time, trying to
maker is in jail...real high class characters you are
>> defending Jerry...
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jerry Barnes [mailto:critic...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 11:25 AM
>> To: cf-community
>> Subject: Re: Limbaugh is voice of GOP majori
e was fraud.
> Notice also the film maker is in jail...real high class characters you are
> defending Jerry...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerry Barnes [mailto:critic...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 11:25 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Limbaugh
u are
> defending Jerry...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerry Barnes [mailto:critic...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 11:25 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Limbaugh is voice of GOP majority?
>
>
> "he was not a journalist. The word implies some att
also the film maker is in jail...real high class characters you are
defending Jerry...
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Barnes [mailto:critic...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 11:25 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Limbaugh is voice of GOP majority?
"he was not a journalist
I told you why I said it. I don't think I can go any further down the road
of proving it to you short of tying you to a chair and taping your eyelids
open.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=shirley+sherrod
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "he was not a journalist. The word implies s
"he was not a journalist. The word implies some attempt to portray a truth and
Breitbart qualifies somewhat less for the title than Hunter Thompson."
Again, you say he wasn't telling the truth, yet give no proof.
"We went through the ACORN videos in excruciating detail here at the time and
I
he was not a journalist. The word implies some attempt to portray a truth
and Breitbart qualifies somewhat less for the title than Hunter Thompson.
We went through the ACORN videos in excruciating detail here at the time
and I have stuff to do so I am not going to look the specifics up for
you.
"ACORN. Shirley Shirone (sp?). PBS apparently too, although I did not go look
at the details of that one."
So, where's the lie? He released videos of these people or organizations
that aren't flattering. Where's the lie?
"If you even question that he misrepresented the truth in the other two
c
ACORN. Shirley Shirone (sp?). PBS apparently too, although I did not go
look at the details of that one. If you even question that he
misrepresented the truth in the other two cases, then you are either
determined to defend him no matter what or you have not compared the edited
versions to what wa
"they can do whatever they want. That's the beauty of America. But that doesn't
mean I have to take it seriously. "
Amen.
"Breitbart was a liar . . ."
Proof?
"...and a punk."
Because you disagree with him?
"My heart goes out to his children, but they actually may be better off."
I can se
"For once, once, I would like for someone to think of the guilty children."
Maybe the host thought the guilty children deserved to die. Pretty sick
either way.
J
-
When we get piled upon one another in large cities, as in Europe, we shall
become as corrupt as Europe. - Thomas Jefferson
~~
That's just truly nasty. But expected.
.
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> they can do whatever they want. That's the beauty of America. But that
> doesn't mean I have to take it seriously. Breitbart was a liar and a punk.
> My heart goes out to his children, but they actually may
i take it you haven't encountered the news stories about god's liberation
army ;)
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:05 PM, PT wrote:
>
> hehe. What in the world?
>
> On 3/9/2012 12:34 PM, Sam wrote:
> >
> > I think he's guilty of something:
> > http://imgur.com/pd6B2
>
>
~
they can do whatever they want. That's the beauty of America. But that
doesn't mean I have to take it seriously. Breitbart was a liar and a punk.
My heart goes out to his children, but they actually may be better off.
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> A little more informa
hehe. What in the world?
On 3/9/2012 12:34 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> I think he's guilty of something:
> http://imgur.com/pd6B2
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155
I think he's guilty of something:
http://imgur.com/pd6B2
.
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:20 PM, PT wrote:
>
> On 3/9/2012 12:10 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>> yet continue to sponsor a leftwing host
>> who relishes in the death of innocent children, we will hold you
>> accountable for that decision.
>
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 9:20 AM, PT wrote:
>
> On 3/9/2012 12:10 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>> yet continue to sponsor a leftwing host
>> who relishes in the death of innocent children, we will hold you
>> accountable for that decision.
>
> For once, once, I would like for someone to think of the gui
On 3/9/2012 12:10 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
> yet continue to sponsor a leftwing host
> who relishes in the death of innocent children, we will hold you
> accountable for that decision.
For once, once, I would like for someone to think of the guilty children.
~
A little more information on advertising:
NB Publisher Bozell Addresses Hypocrisy In Letters to Quicken Loans,
Carbonite Chiefs
This morning, NewsBusters publisher and Media Research Center founder Brent
Bozell sent letters to Jay Farner and David Friend, the presidents of
Quicken Loans and Carb
Rush Limbaugh has rejected an advertisers apparent attempt to reunite
with his show after the company initially dropped its ads from the
program following his remarks about contraception advocate Sandra
Fluke.
got to love this comment:
"Sleep Train derails their own business
. Theyre Fluked."
I think Jane Fonda was the only one on the left that even mentioned
it. Barbara Wawa thought it was funny
.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> I would agree with that to an extent, but calling someone a slut or a
> whore/prostitute or similar degrading monikers still cros
and placed himself on suspension as a result of the complaints.
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 8:32 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Limbaugh is voice of GOP majority?
Moreover there are very different rules for
She's an activist that mock testified at a press conference put on by congress.
That put her in the public eye
.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> Moreover there are very different rules for those in the public eye,
> such as Coulter or Malkin than for a private citizen
"Maher may be realizing that one day he will probably be in the same position
Limbaugh is in."
He already has been. Several times (most recently, it was about Tebo).
Probably expects it to happen again though...
J
-
Ninety percent of politicians give the other ten percent a bad reputat
Yes it called slander and libel laws. look them up.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Casey Dougall - Uber Website Solutions
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
>> Moreover there are very different rules for those in the public eye,
>> such as Coulter or Malkin than
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> Moreover there are very different rules for those in the public eye,
> such as Coulter or Malkin than for a private citizen exercising her
> constitutional rights.
>
Happy International Women's Day
~~~
Moreover there are very different rules for those in the public eye,
such as Coulter or Malkin than for a private citizen exercising her
constitutional rights.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> Not comparable.
> None of these women were speaking about women's rights at the time, a
Maher may be realizing that one day he will probably be in the same
position Limbaugh is in.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> Bill Maher: Accept Rush Limbaugh's apology
>
> Bill Maher supporting Rush Limbaugh?
>
> It doesn't sound very likely, but on Tuesday, the left
I know conservative vs Liberal.
.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> Not comparable.
> None of these women were speaking about women's rights at the time, and
> called a slut and a prostitute in return.
> You are right that it is unrelated, because the context is completely
> diff
6:16 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Limbaugh is voice of GOP majority?
Bill Maher: Accept Rush Limbaugh's apology
Bill Maher supporting Rush Limbaugh?
It doesn't sound very likely, but on Tuesday, the left-leaning "Real Time"
host took to Twitter to call out liberals for their co
Bill Maher: Accept Rush Limbaugh's apology
Bill Maher supporting Rush Limbaugh?
It doesn't sound very likely, but on Tuesday, the left-leaning "Real Time"
host took to Twitter to call out liberals for their continuous criticism of
Limbaugh, who recently apologized for calling Georgetown student
Not comparable.
None of these women were speaking about women's rights at the time, and
called a slut and a prostitute in return.
You are right that it is unrelated, because the context is completely
different.
On 7 March 2012 22:46, Sam wrote:
>
> Totally unrelated but entertaining nonetheless
" Contraception has always been a party issue. At least, at many of
the parties
I've been to..."
Zing!
J
-
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Benjamin Franklin
~~~
Totally unrelated but entertaining nonetheless enjoy:
http://michellemalkin.com/2012/03/07/the-war-on-conservative-women/
Iâm sorry Rush Limbaugh called 30-year-old Georgetown law student
Sandra Fluke a âslut.â Sheâs really just another professional
femme-a-gogue helping to manufacture a
White house sponsored petition to stop using taxpayer money to spread hate.
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> White house hosted petition to stop free speech.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/03/06/pentagon-to-keep-rush-limbaugh-on-the-air/
Pentagon said they will keep Rush on air no matter what the WH
propaganda page suggests.
OK, I added the propaganda part for those that will read the article
thinking they admitted it. :)
.
~~~
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> Yes but birth control is an ideological purity issue for the various
> wings right now. Logic and reason has little or nothing to do with it,
> as we have seen.
Contraception has always been a party issue. At least, at many of the
parties
Yes but birth control is an ideological purity issue for the various
wings right now. Logic and reason has little or nothing to do with it,
as we have seen.
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> Yeah, I think that even though the Freakonomics study is about abortion, it
>
1 - 100 of 331 matches
Mail list logo
