America first and then the global community.
If Iraq did have the WMDs and nuclear weapons and we
had even more proof then we had last year, France,
Russia and Germany still would not have supported the
war. Most Arab nation still wouldn't have supported
the war.
-sm
--- Jim Davis [EMAIL
: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 10:31 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Bin Laden shows his ugly face
America first and then the global community.
If Iraq did have the WMDs and nuclear weapons and we
had even more proof then we had last year, France,
Russia and Germany still would not have supported the
war
PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Bin Laden shows his ugly face
America first and then the global community.
If Iraq did have the WMDs and nuclear weapons and we
had even more proof then we had last year, France,
Russia and Germany still would not have supported the
war. Most Arab nation still
Ken Ketsdever [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And we know this to be the case because you say so?
-Original Message-
From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If Iraq did have the WMDs and nuclear weapons and we
had even more proof then we had last year, France,
Russia and Germany still
Sam Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If Iraq did have the WMDs and nuclear weapons and we
had even more proof then we had last year, France,
Russia and Germany still would not have supported the
war. Most Arab nation still wouldn't have supported
the war.
I had no idea you were on the UN
It's funny that I was accused of being able to read the mind of Bush
on another thread by Sam, yet, he is able to prognisticate what half
the world would do. :)
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:40:10 -0600, Gruss Gott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sam Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If Iraq did have the
I believe by pointing this out you are now in violation of the Patriot Act. The next
knock on your door will be Sam and the Feds.
-Original Message-
From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 11:58 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bin Laden shows
, November 02, 2004 2:58 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bin Laden shows his ugly face
It's funny that I was accused of being able to read the mind of Bush
on another thread by Sam, yet, he is able to prognisticate what half
the world would do. :)
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:40:10 -0600, Gruss Gott [EMAIL
Jim wrote:
But it's a good bet that those
countries, while being unable to challenge the action reasonably would have
still failed to fully support it.
The way I view the situation, they were ready to commit, but wanted to
let the weapons inspectors finish. It seems to me that Mr. Bush
-Community
Subject: Re: Bin Laden shows his ugly face
Jim wrote:
But it's a good bet that those
countries, while being unable to challenge the action reasonably would
have
still failed to fully support it.
The way I view the situation, they were ready to commit, but wanted to
let the weapons
Sam wrote:
Spin.
He said and you can prove to the world that you did
it for legitimate reasons
Ok, but I think if edit the tapes right he also says that he want to
hug Hussein.
~|
Purchase from House of Fusion, a
IF terrorism is what is on the minds of people and our number one terrorist threat for
the past 3 years just popped up again after three years of failed attempts to track
him down. How can people possibly vote for Bush. Bush has failed for the past three
years.
People are morons.
We shouldn't have to roughly predict. I agree with your assessment of
Kerry, but why can't he spell it out as coherently? The second he uttered
global test, he should of had his criteria readyundecided voters don't
like roughly predicting.
So you are right that his words are being spun out of
--- Jim Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That sentence clearly places the approval for action
before world testament.
We did it NOT we're going to do it (if you
approve). The Republicans
are painting the statement out of context and
intimating Kerry suggested
that the world community have
Subject: Re: Bin Laden shows his ugly face
We shouldn't have to roughly predict. I agree with your assessment of
Kerry, but why can't he spell it out as coherently? The second he uttered
global test, he should of had his criteria readyundecided voters don't
like roughly predicting.
So you
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 1:44 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Bin Laden shows his ugly face
--- Jim Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That sentence clearly places the approval for action
before world testament.
We did it NOT we're going to do it (if you
approve
actually see very little
difference between the
candidates. Lots of hunting, lots of killing.
Jim Davis
-Original Message-
From: Robert Munn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 12:52 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bin Laden shows his ugly face
I think
engagement without a long-term or exit
strategy.
Jim Davis
-Original Message-
From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 2:38 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Bin Laden shows his ugly face
There's also the global approval comment and the only
dying
: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 12:36 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bin Laden shows his ugly face
Andy wrote:
just cause you back a paradigm that doesn't succeed
doesn't make you a bad CEO. Most experiments fail.
When you're diverting funds
Sam wrote:
There's also the global approval comment
If you listen to or read the comment in context it's clear that Mr.
Kerry used the term global as a synonym for all encompassing, not
world wide.
The idea that he didn't is a flat out lie and you should stop perpetuating it.
Andy wrote:
I my original response was that his experience operating a boat in a war 30
years ago doesn't make him a better leader today. It should make it easier
for him to relate to the troops, but this may be countered somewhat by his
stand when he left the service.
It's a fact that Mr.
I heard what he said clearly. You're trying to spin it
but it won't work.
--- Gruss Gott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sam wrote:
There's also the global approval comment
If you listen to or read the comment in context it's
clear that Mr.
Kerry used the term global as a synonym for all
Sam wrote:
I heard what he said clearly. You're trying to spin it
but it won't work.
No spin, here's the transcript:
LEHRER: What is your position on the whole concept of preemptive war?
KERRY: The president always has the right, and always has had the
right, for preemptive strike. That was
-Original Message-
From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 12:01 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bin Laden shows his ugly face
I heard what he said clearly. You're trying to spin it
but it won't work.
How could the statement, in full context, mean
against that war. So what do you think he considers
proof?
--- Jim Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 12:01 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bin Laden shows his ugly face
I heard what he said
Iraq shot at our planes everyday for years. On the eve
of Clintons impeachment he bombs Iraq. I think Saddam
might have laughed.
As for Somalia, remember Black Hawk Down?
Many believe that's what convinced Bin Laden that we
were weak and could easily be attacked in our
homeland.
-sm
--- Jim
-Original Message-
From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 1:19 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Bin Laden shows his ugly face
Spin.
He said and you can prove to the world that you did
it for legitimate reasons
That sentence clearly places
Then he should rejoin the military at a lower level. The Best CEO's are not
those that know how to work the lathe.
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 12:28 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bin Laden shows his ugly face
Jim
Andy wrote:
Then he should rejoin the military at a lower level. The Best CEO's are not
those that know how to work the lathe.
What school did you get your MBA from?
The best CEOs are the ones that know the business, understand that
growth takes time and partnerships, and can manage at each
I fail to see why Bush would be the default choice. He has yet to
catch the guy after all. But I agree, let us not give this asshole
legitimacy.
Dana
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 00:51:40 -0400, Robert Munn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think Mr. Bush said it best today, Americans will not be
intimidated
the truism I like is: nothing happens until somebody sells something.
In other words, all those inconvenient nitty-gritty details like
product *do* matter.
Dana
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 12:51:30 -0500, Gruss Gott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy wrote:
Then he should rejoin the military at a lower
Gruss,
You've logic doesn't flow and none of it has anything to do with an MBA --
which is about as far away from the factory floor as you can get.
Your first statement starts at the self-evident and moves quickly to
fallacies. Growth doesn't always take time, but does take a market and
Andy wrote:
just cause you back a paradigm that doesn't succeed
doesn't make you a bad CEO. Most experiments fail.
When you're diverting funds and resources from fully supporting your
bread and butter, it does make you a bad CEO. Exploring adjacencies
is fine, just make sure your main line
Robert wrote:
Bin Laden has now showed his ugly face. it could be lights out for John Kerry.
It could be, or it could remind people that Bin Laden is still at large.
Either way I hope that nobody changes their mind due to this guy - if
they do, and polls show it, it will be a victory for Bin
I think Mr. Bush said it best today, Americans will not be
intimidated or influenced by an enemy of our country. I'm sure Senator
Kerry agrees with this.
We should do nothing to indicate that Bin Laden has any influence in any way.
Agreed. What I am suggesting is that the appearance of this
Robert wrote:
But we have a few local issues in San Diego
Do you do any biking? I've heard San Diego is great for it and
supports biking to work, etc. I haven't been there in awhile though -
any truth?
~|
Purchase from House
shows his ugly face
I think Mr. Bush said it best today, Americans will not be
intimidated or influenced by an enemy of our country. I'm sure Senator
Kerry agrees with this.
We should do nothing to indicate that Bin Laden has any influence in any
way.
Agreed. What I am suggesting
Jim wrote:
As far as terrorism goes I actually see very little difference between the
candidates. Lots of hunting, lots of killing.
The difference is that Mr. Kerry has personally hunted and killed
humans before, so he has a better instinct for what works and what
doesn't.
, October 30, 2004 1:28 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bin Laden shows his ugly face
Jim wrote:
As far as terrorism goes I actually see very little difference between the
candidates. Lots of hunting, lots of killing.
The difference is that Mr. Kerry has personally hunted and killed
humans
39 matches
Mail list logo
