The You bow to no one bit got me too.
--
Jay
-Original Message-
From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 December 2004 06:38
To: CF-Community
Subject: Return of the King Extended Edition
Just watched it through.
I know I'm a geek... but when Sam says ...Rosie Cotton dancing
of the rings was excellent all
round.
It must be said that all fans have there gripes about bits that were missed
out from the books, and I have 2 that I wish had been included.
1) Tom Bombadil is a superb caracter and could have been an amusing
addition.
2) The end of Return Of The King was missing
I think it would have been a better end than the extended tearjerker
at the Gray Havens. Even I was squirming by the end of that, and I'm
one of those people that read all the supporting materials
Dana
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 09:00:58 -0800, Ian Skinner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Both of those
-Original Message-
From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 1:46 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Return of the King Extended Edition
with ribbons in her hair :)
what's this about the mouth of Sauron though?
Dana
[I tried to reply
-Original Message-
From: James Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 9:43 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Return of the King Extended Edition
[I tried to reply to this with the web interface, but it bombed out... so
here it is. But if Mike fixes
on the river bank?
Dana
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 18:12:28 -0500, Jim Davis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: James Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 9:43 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Return of the King Extended Edition
[I tried
-Original Message-
From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 6:20 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Return of the King Extended Edition
I think everyone who wants to see the movie has seen it.
I suppose I should get the extended version. I don't
me too.
--
Jay
-Original Message-
From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 December 2004 06:38
To: CF-Community
Subject: Return of the King Extended Edition
Just watched it through.
I know I'm a geek... but when Sam says ...Rosie Cotton dancing I tear up
that were missed
out from the books, and I have 2 that I wish had been included.
1) Tom Bombadil is a superb caracter and could have been an amusing
addition.
2) The end of Return Of The King was missing a good 30-60 minutes of story
about Saruman and the shire.
What bits do you wish had been included
Both of those were excellent story - Bombadil and the Scouring of the Shire.
However Bombadil was an add on - Tolkein's Tree and Leaf has some interesting
commentaries about that. As for the scouring of the shire, it was really there
to bring closure, and essentially was a minimal reprise of
Just watched it through.
I know I'm a geek... but when Sam says ...Rosie Cotton dancing I tear up.
And then when Aragorn says You bow to no one... I just blubber like a
baby.
A big, fat, hairy baby.
(The extended edition was great... I've no idea why they left out The Mouth
of Sauron. That was
with ribbons in her hair :)
what's this about the mouth of Sauron though?
Dana
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 01:38:06 -0500, Jim Davis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just watched it through.
I know I'm a geek... but when Sam says ...Rosie Cotton dancing I tear up.
And then when Aragorn says You bow to
Subject: Re: Return of the King - SPOILER -
Elfquest of course. Evercrack is different.
larry
At 09:30 PM 12/21/2003, you wrote:
Did you mean EverQuest or ElfQuest fans?
...
- Original Message -
From: Larry C. Lyons
To: CF-Community
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 11:45 AM
Subject: RE: Return
://www.dvdocumentaries.com/images/eq_002.jpghttp://www.dvdocumentaries.com/images/eq_002.jpg
- Original Message -
From: Larry C. Lyons
To: CF-Community
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 11:31 PM
Subject: Re: Return of the King - SPOILER -
Elfquest of course. Evercrack is different.
larry
At 09:30 PM 12/21/2003, you
just saw it for the 2nd time last night with my wife.
when the head of ministirith sends his son off to near certain death
there is a scene with gandolf staring at some empty baskets.
what's up with that?
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
unfunny.
Jim Davis
_
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2003 3:53 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Return of the King - SPOILER -
Wizards came before Bakshi's LOTR, and it was merely coloured scenes
from the movie Zulu. Fire and Ice used a much more
mine for comic pros.
Jim Davis
_
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2003 3:58 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Return of the King - SPOILER -
Given that he filmed it first then animated on top of it, its no
wonder it was an expensive effort. I also
Did you mean EverQuest or ElfQuest fans?
...
- Original Message -
From: Larry C. Lyons
To: CF-Community
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 11:45 AM
Subject: RE: Return of the King - SPOILER -
Glad I'm notthe only one with that impression. Some of the EQ fans
I've met at various
ElfQuest - the comic.
Do rabid EverQuest fans ever actually leave their homes?;^)
Jim Davis
_
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 9:30 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Return of the King - SPOILER -
Did you mean EverQuest or ElfQuest fans
Elfquest of course. Evercrack is different.
larry
At 09:30 PM 12/21/2003, you wrote:
Did you mean EverQuest or ElfQuest fans?
...
- Original Message -
From: Larry C. Lyons
To: CF-Community
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 11:45 AM
Subject: RE: Return of the King - SPOILER -
Glad I'm
The rotoscoping was better in Wizards, too.
will
Larry C. Lyons wrote:
I have the movies on DVD, the Rankin and Bass The Hobbit and Return
of the King, and Ralph Bakshi's Lord of the Rings.The Rankin and
Bass stuff are garbage, the Bakshi film was an interesting
experiment. The rotoscopy
to do the second installment of his
version.
Jim Davis
_
From: William H Bowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2003 2:55 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Return of the King - SPOILER -
The rotoscoping was better in Wizards, too.
will
Larry C. Lyons wrote:
I
Cool World was about his last quarter decent film.
larry
The rotoscoping was better in Wizards, too.
will
Larry C. Lyons wrote:
I have the movies on DVD, the Rankin and Bass The Hobbit and Return
of the King, and Ralph Bakshi's Lord of the Rings.The Rankin and
Bass stuff are garbage, the Bakshi
and where Galadriel s tempted).
But still, I wish Bakshi had been able to do the second installment of his
version.
Jim Davis
_
From: William H Bowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2003 2:55 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Return of the King - SPOILER
unfunny.
Jim Davis
_
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2003 3:53 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Return of the King - SPOILER -
Wizards came before Bakshi's LOTR, and it was merely coloured scenes
from the movie Zulu. Fire and Ice used a much more
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2003 3:58 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Return of the King - SPOILER -
Given that he filmed it first then animated on top of it, its no
wonder it was an expensive effort. I also preferred elements of the
Bakshi LOTR. However Bakshi does
Ok,
Anybody else think the film failed at the end (from a perspective of the
final chapter in the book). The return to the shire was very poorly
executed.
The place was supposed to have been wrecked and under an oppressive rule.
The 4 hobbits should have come in and kicked butt, where as before
That comment is just inappropriate. This is the LOTR, for goodness sake.
Something must be sacred.
M
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 8:43 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Return of the King - SPOILER -
space
.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 10:02 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Return of the King - SPOILER -
Caution. Do not read if you hold LoTR sacred.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
Are you kidding!?! That's what I thought throughout the whole
been approved or sanctioned by these organizations. This e-mail is
unclassified based on the definitions in E.O. 12958.
-Original Message-
From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 10:11 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Return of the King - SPOILER -
Both
you.
-Kevin
- Original Message -
From: Adam Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 9:02 AM
Subject: RE: Return of the King - SPOILER -
I must admit when Frodo woke up and they were all prancing on that bed it
was all very homo-erotic
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 2:04 AM
Subject: Return of the King - SPOILER -
Ok,
Anybody else think the film failed at the end (from a perspective of the
final chapter in the book). The return to the shire was very poorly
executed.
The place was supposed to have been wrecked and under
Me thinks you have given this _WAY_ too much thought.
=)
Jerry Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/19/03 10:43AM
snip
-Kevin
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
Well at least I was having fun while watching the movies!
-Kevin
- Original Message -
From: Jerry Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 9:49 AM
Subject: Re: Return of the King - SPOILER -
Me thinks you have given this _WAY_ too
are both men, right?Are they supposed to be gay?
Off to work now.
At 06:05 AM 12/19/2003, you wrote:
Subject: Return of the King - SPOILER -
From: Adam Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 10:04:53 -
Thread:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm/method=messagesthreadid
]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 9:25 AM
Subject: Re: Return of the King - SPOILER -
I was pretty unimpressed.The movie started off slow and ended
slow.But, the middle was very good.I'll agree that a few of the scenes
look pretty bluescreen-ish, as someone else said
- Original Message -
From: Jeffry Houser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 7:25 AM
Subject: Re: Return of the King - SPOILER -
I seem to remember the spider being able to talk (?) and Sam wearing the
ring for a bit.I don't remember
Not explicitly.In the book they go on to have families and become
important Hobbits of the Shire.I would say that the male love that is
being descibed as homoerotic and/or gay in this list, is supposed to be
Chivileric and/or Esperit de Corps type feelings that are not very much
used
in
I have an even vaguer memory of the animated movies.:-)
I think I'm going to have to read the books again.
At 04:05 PM 12/19/2003, you wrote:
Subject: Return of the King - SPOILER -
From: Kevin Graeme [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 14:40:01 -0600
Thread:
http://www.houseoffusion.com
I have the movies on DVD, the Rankin and Bass The Hobbit and Return
of the King, and Ralph Bakshi's Lord of the Rings.The Rankin and
Bass stuff are garbage, the Bakshi film was an interesting
experiment. The rotoscopy technique he used was much better developed
infilm Fire and Ice he did
Alright, alright, I know how everyone hates spoilers so I will stay away
from discussions of the actual story. What did everyone think of the CGI
in that movie? There were some parts that were rather cludgy (esp.
during the calvary scenes) but Gollum was done spectacularly well.
M
[Todays
Golum is not CGI - he's Chris Kattan.
g
- Original Message -
From: Haggerty, Mike
To: CF-Community
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 11:35 AM
Subject: Return of the King
Alright, alright, I know how everyone hates spoilers so I will stay away
from discussions of the actual story. What
Iggy Pop.
Howie Hamlin wrote:
Golum is not CGI - he's Chris Kattan.
g
- Original Message -
From: Haggerty, Mike
To: CF-Community
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 11:35 AM
Subject: Return of the King
Alright, alright, I know how everyone hates spoilers so I will stay away
from
That explains it.
M
-Original Message-
From: Jim Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 11:41 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Return of the King
Iggy Pop.
Howie Hamlin wrote:
Golum is not CGI - he's Chris Kattan.
g
- Original Message -
From
Alright, alright, I know how everyone hates spoilers so I will stay away
from discussions of the actual story. What did everyone think of the CGI
in that movie? There were some parts that were rather cludgy (esp.
during the calvary scenes) but Gollum was done spectacularly well.
Something
Hmm.Maybe we should thaw Iggy.
--benD
Jim Campbell wrote:
Iggy Pop.
Howie Hamlin wrote:
Golum is not CGI - he's Chris Kattan.
g
- Original Message -
From: Haggerty, Mike
To: CF-Community
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 11:35 AM
Subject: Return of the King
Alright, alright, I
11:49 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Return of the King
Alright, alright, I know how everyone hates spoilers so I will stay away
from discussions of the actual story. What did everyone think of the CGI
in that movie? There were some parts that were rather cludgy (esp.
during the calvary
V: (954) 360-9022 ext. 159
F: (954) 360-9095
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W:http://www.ediets.com/ www.ediets.com
-Original Message-
From: Paul Ihrig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 3:07 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: return of the king game...
ok.. while pondering
!
- Original Message -
From: Bill Wheatley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 6:56 AM
Subject: RE: return of the king game...
| I just got prince of persia man the memories of the old school game ;)
| PoP is really quite well done i have some
Subject: Re: return of the king game...
Bill;
This is off topic, that is if anything can be off topic on CF-Community.
I notice the reference to ediets.com in you signature, so I thought I
would ask.
I notice, for one that ediets mail server is listed on a number of
anti-spam
block lists
==
If you are not satisfied with my service, my job isn't done!
- Original Message -
From: Bill Wheatley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 6:56 AM
Subject: RE: return of the king game...
| I just got prince of persia man
-9095
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W:http://www.ediets.com/ www.ediets.com
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 9:04 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: return of the king game...
Last week an email from another list member was blocked
I really hope that is not the case as I accept ALL mail sent to my server. I
bounce nothing.
OHHH another fun thing. You know how aol does its check of OPEN RELAYS??
its complete freaking crap. They don't really check they simply email
your server with something that should bounce and if it
.
Deerfield Beach, FL33442
V: (954) 360-9022 ext. 159
F: (954) 360-9095
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W:http://www.ediets.com/ www.ediets.com
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 9:13 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: open relays Re: return
service, my job isn't done!
- Original Message -
From: Bill Wheatley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 8:18 AM
Subject: RE: open relays Re: return of the king game...
| LOL well check itout sometime goto theaol tool.
|
| It appears to be gone
ok.. while pondering the crapitudes of un-employment
i picked up return of the king game on the pc.
its pretty basic 3rd person hack slash.
no config tweaking...
kind of predictable, but enjoyable.
stuck at the gates of doom or black gate..
think i jammed a finger...
cant get my wedding ring
56 matches
Mail list logo
