40 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack
>
> Fear of litigation run amok. Iwe are really sure that that strange
> lightning bolt in the middle of my vision will go away in a few minutes
> and requires only a doctor's app
ody will talk to you on the phone
>about medical stuff. Period. You must see a doctor.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 3:03 PM
>> To: CF-Community
>> Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to
That is very strange. Around here nobody will talk to you on the phone
about medical stuff. Period. You must see a doctor.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 3:03 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Saddam Pr
I have. It has even occasionally worked for me. They correctly diagnosed an
ocular migraine, which was scaring me because I had never had one or heard of
one. I was thinking stoke but was very happy to avoid ten hours at the ER. They
tend to be overcautious though. I quit calling about the pains
The second editorial is a very good summary of both the state of politics
and public opinion in the UK at the moment.
On 3/19/06, Dana Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Interesting. I was looking at this analysis:
>
> http://news.scotsman.com/international.cfm?id=433252006
>
> and if I under
m: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 11:21 PM
>> To: CF-Community
>> Subject: RE: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent
>> Attack
>>
>> I've heard that a lot of HMO's won't let you see a doctor
>
sis, that I had to come in
> -Original Message-
> From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 11:21 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack
>
> I've heard that a lot of HMO
Interesting. I was looking at this analysis:
http://news.scotsman.com/international.cfm?id=433252006
and if I understand you you think the first editorial is correct? I'd love for
you to be right about that, but I am more inclined to believe the second,
personally. For the click impaired...
Ir
Well yeah. Wouldn't more oil be flowing if things were going the way we wanted
them?
>Wouldn't we make more money if more oil was flowing?
>
>fantasy,
>> but I ask you, if it were true, would anything be different?
>>
>>
>> >OK, so they produce about 1.1 Million, prior to the war they were
>doi
Wouldn't we make more money if more oil was flowing?
> -Original Message-
> From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 10:24 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack
>
> Yeah
um, this is an answer to Kevin's access to medical care remarks right? Not my
paranoid fantasy? Just checking.
>wow, you should live here in salisbury.
>i was on the golf course last week (friday)
>left at 1:45, was in the dr.'s office by 3:45, and
>in the MRI within 1 day.
>
>nice place
>
>On 3/
was in Ireland.
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 10:58 PM
> >> To: CF-Community
> >> Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack
> >>
> &
yeah, but the American companies are making more money off it. I hasten to add
that I know nothing, this is all purely speculation, mm, a trial balloon for a
sci-fi novel I am writing, that's the ticket...
But supposing that had been the plan. But it did not go according to plan. Our
Man in Ba
n Ireland.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 10:58 PM
>> To: CF-Community
>> Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack
>>
>> You sure about that? Mr Chalabi seem
y to get you out the door than they are concerned
about a proper diagnosis.
> Huh? Can't see a doctor? I call make an appointment.
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 6:56 PM
>> To: CF-Communi
Huh? Can't see a doctor? I call make an appointment.
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 6:56 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack
>
> Yep. Americ
Yeah, but a hell of a lot more that got on a boat to fight.
> -Original Message-
> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> There were a lot of Americans that ran and hid!
>
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.c
You know they're watching all of us, right?
>A majority of Americans thinks that the administration is only spying on
>terrorists.
>
>>As for "electronic surveillance of law abiding citizens", everyone in
>>Congress who has been briefed on the program, Democrats and Republicans,
>>is
>>strongly
Actually, almost no one. There is little oil flowing and when it does it's
between Iraq and American companies. So yes, there is more oil in American
control but less moving. If we go with the conspiracy theory that this is
all a war for the oil companies, then yes, it all fits together. Of cour
e not seen an ExxonMobile
station sense I was in Ireland.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 10:58 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack
>
> You sure about
I'm sorry, what?
> -Original Message-
> From: Vivec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 1:09 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack
>
> Yes yes,
>
> America the Great, America the
Yep. America where we pay 3x more for 1/3 the broadband speed of other
countries. Where we pay more for mobile phone service and get less
than other countries. Where we pay more for medical coverage, but
can't even see a doctor when we have borderline pneumonia.
On 3/18/06, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED
This kind of thing is a 10-20 year plan. Pointing to the results now
is a red-herring. The question is what groundwork has been lain for 15
years out?
On 3/17/06, Dana Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes but:
>
> Who controls the flow from Iraq now? Who controlled it then? What is the
> pric
I'd rather not speculate about Larry's problem ;) I do realize that Wayne is
British and lives in Wales.
>Dana, I think Larry's problem and your perhaps, is that you assumed when
>I said Wayne's countrymen, you assumed I meant American's when in fact,
>Wayne is British.
>
>
>Dana Tierney wrot
> Nick wrote:
> But there were a lot of French that did run and hide.
>
There were a lot of Americans that ran and hid!
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:200594
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_
> Schmidt wrote:
> Remind me again how long it took before Hitler was strolling around the
> streets of Paris?
>
That was one battle, ding-dong, not the war. The allies eventually
won and the French Resistance were a key part of the allies' victory.
Here's one small example:
At about 12:15am on
> Dana wrote:
> was the goal ever to benefit the *taxpayer*?
>
Sure, more security via no WMD, no dictator, etc, etc.
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:200589
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_li
Who controls Iraq now? Haven't people been using the word "Civil
War"? I don't think anyone really does. The US coalition forces
control certain aspects, but certainly not the entire country, or all
the industry in that country.
-Cameron
On 3/17/06, Dana Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ye
Dana, I think Larry's problem and your perhaps, is that you assumed when
I said Wayne's countrymen, you assumed I meant American's when in fact,
Wayne is British.
Dana Tierney wrote:
> the government did surrender quite quickly, to the continuing shame of the
> population. However the French h
the government did surrender quite quickly, to the continuing shame of the
population. However the French had one of the most active Resistance movements
in Europe. The house I used to live in in Chantilly was part of an underground
railroad that got Allied fighters back to their units.
And Kev
was the goal ever to benefit the *taxpayer*?
> > Dane wrote:
> > Who controls the flow from Iraq now? Who controlled it then? What is
> the price of oil now?
>
> On this one you're barking up the wrong tree. The whole oil thing is
> yet another massive failure and miscalculation by the Bush
> a
Yes yes,
America the Great, America the All Powerful.
All Hail America.
yadda yadda yadda.
*waves off*
On 3/18/06, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, there were a lot of Frenchmen in WWII that did fight, but there
> were a lot that didn't. The German army was doing something people
Yeah, there were a lot of Frenchmen in WWII that did fight, but there
were a lot that didn't. The German army was doing something people
weren't used to, so it was very difficult to defend against.
But there were a lot of French that did run and hide.
> -Original Message-
> From: Gruss Go
I see now, after reading back through all these, you thought Wayne was
American? He's British.
A simple misunderstanding on your part Larry. But see, you still won't
admit it, will you?
Jerry Johnson wrote:
> I don't have a dog in this fight, but...
>
> Larry, reading back through this thr
And Larry, if you really know as much about WWII as you claim, you would
know that the Germans sitting around for two days is what really saved
the Allies at Dunkirk. If they had kept pushing on, the Allies would've
suffered a crushing blow. That two days allowed the allies to organize
their e
t;>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Wayne, just be glad your fellow countrymen a generation ago didn't
> >>>>>>>>>> "grow
>
The military leadership was lacking, as was their tactics and their
technology. The bravery of the soldiers was not. Read up about the
evacuation of Dunkirk and how the French army in that part of France
sacrificed itself to give the British time to complete the evacuation.
If it was not for those
;>> out", otherwise, you'd probably be speaking German.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Wayne Putterill wro
t;>>> Wayne Putterill wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I'm not anti american, I'm anti anyone who makes this wo
Remind me again how long it took before Hitler was strolling around the
streets of Paris?
Germany invaded France in early May of 1940 and the French surrendered
around the middle of June. Sounds like an ass kicking to me.
Gruss Gott wrote:
>> Schmidt wrote:
>> Kind of like with France, only t
place to be.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm not bashing america, my own country had a large part in this
>>>>&
> Schmidt wrote:
> Kind of like with France, only they did have guns, they're just
> terrible fighters..
>
As you've never served in the military or fought in any war, much less
WWII, that's quite an arrogant, as well as ignorant, opinion.
Just cite a few examples, if if wasn't for the French in
>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> As for calling me antisemetic, anyone who knows me would laugh out
> >>>>>>> loud at that - particularly my jewish friends.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I
+1
:)
On 3/18/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Translation: The American tax payer is fucked. There will be no oil
> profits to pay for the war and there's no guarantee that anything
> positive for America will be gained for America. In fact there's a
> significant risk that the estim
> Dane wrote:
> Who controls the flow from Iraq now? Who controlled it then? What is the
> price of oil now?
On this one you're barking up the wrong tree. The whole oil thing is
yet another massive failure and miscalculation by the Bush
administration. Remember when Lawrence Lindsey was fired f
You sure about that? Mr Chalabi seems to have a lot to do with it still. You
remember Mr Chalabi, right?
http://www.iraqdirectory.com/DisplayNews.aspx?id=819
As for your second sentence...
http://www.exxonmobil.com/Siteflow/SuppInfo/Contacts/SF_CT_BusHeadquarters.asp
http://www.consumersunion
who are terrible fighters? The British???
>I'm not denying that, but if all of the British then "grew out" of
>playing with guns, and became pacifists there would've been no one to
>defend the country, thus the Germans would've been able to walk right
>in. Kind of like with France, only they d
Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack
>
> Yes but:
>
> Who controls the flow from Iraq now? Who controlled it then? What is
the
> price of oil now? What was it then? What are oil company profits now?
What
> were they then?
>
> I am actually asking, thoug
A majority of Americans thinks that the administration is only spying on
terrorists.
>As for "electronic surveillance of law abiding citizens", everyone in
>Congress who has been briefed on the program, Democrats and Republicans, is
>strongly in favor of continuing the NSA program, as are a large
It does, actually. It's right up there with the New England Journal of
Medecine. And the authors are from Johns Hopkins, also a highly respected
academic institution.
"The paper was "extensively peer-reviewed, revised, edited" and rushed into
print "because of its importance to the evolving se
Yes but:
Who controls the flow from Iraq now? Who controlled it then? What is the price
of oil now? What was it then? What are oil company profits now? What were they
then?
I am actually asking, though I strongly suspect I know the answers. And if I am
right, well of *course* this would be irr
Why would anybody want to grow out of playing with guns and blowing
stuff up?
It's fun. Hell around here its encouraged!
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 6:51 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Sadd
>>>>> How about you stop with America bashing bullshit? And the anti-Semitic
>>>>>>>> bullshit that you lefties like to spout. It makes me sick. How about
>>>>>>>> instead of sitting around bitching you actually stand for somethin
I don't have a dog in this fight, but...
Larry, reading back through this thread, it looks like Wayne said he
"grew out" of "playing with guns".
Kevin then pointed out that if all of Brits (Wayne is a Brit, I think,
and therefore his countrymen would have been Brits) had felt this way
during the w
Yes, he said the find any they may have, and remove their capability to
make them in the future.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 4:19 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> There were no weapons found, there is no was to ever prove they did or
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>> did
Did Bush ever say we were invading Iraq to keep them from making chemical or
biological weapons?
>No, but I am saying the IAEA wasn't charged with looking into chemical and
>biological weapons. So while they didn't find nuclear weapon making stuff, I
>don't recall them concluding on the other stu
I'll follow my conspiracy with your line of thinking and say that Israel
doesn't care about the world knowing, it cares about it's enemies thinking
that it has the bomb to prevent them from doing another all-out attack. The
leak that they (supposedly) had the bomb came after there was a war in
>> did
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> not exist at this point.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW Why is that "spin"? Are all of my statements true?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How
gt;>>>
> >>>> How about you stop with America bashing bullshit? And the anti-Semitic
> >>>> bullshit that you lefties like to spout. It makes me sick. How about
> >>>> instead of sitting around bitching you actually stand for something,
>
As it's against my religious beliefs I would do everything possible to avoid
it, but once all civilised options were exhausted there may arise
circumstances where I would with very deep reluctance.
On 3/17/06, Kevin Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm not comparing to today. I'm trying to a
Are they? Maybe you should ask the eleven women and children we killed there
the other day
>So, haven't we made the world a better place for the Iraqi people? Aren't
>they more free because of our actions?
~|
Message: http://w
I'm not comparing to today. I'm trying to ascertain what makes you tick.
I'll ask point blank, would you take up arms if Britain was invaded?
Wayne Putterill wrote:
> On 3/17/06, Kevin Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> No, I was saying that if all of Britain was of the same mind as you
Really, I thought that ones was more liberal sources.
> -Original Message-
> From: Wayne Putterill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 4:10 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack
>
> The whole p
On 3/17/06, Kevin Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No, I was saying that if all of Britain was of the same mind as you
> during WWII the Germans would've met no resistance and taken over the
> entire country.
>
> Am I wrong?
>
You are completly wrong in comparing what is going on in the worl
3911
>-Original Message-
>From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 10:40 PM
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack
>
>Oh come on. They wanted to invade so badly they could barely sit still. The
Yes,
the two events and circumstances cannot be compared.
Which makes the point irrelevant.
On 3/17/06, Kevin Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, I was saying that if all of Britain was of the same mind as you
> during WWII the Germans would've met no resistance and taken over the
> entire co
>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There were no weapons found, there is no was to ever prove they did
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>> or
>>>>
>>>>
&
On 3/17/06, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now for the conspiracy theory. Israel has no nukes. They never did. They
> have been fooling their enemies for the last 50 odd years by making them
> think they have the bomb and in that way keeping relatively safe. The
> whistle-blower was
3911
>-Original Message-
>From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 10:40 PM
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack
>
>Oh come on. They wanted to invade so badly they could barely sit still. The
ieve
> in
> constants isn't that right?
>
> --
> Tim Heald
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 703-300-3911
> -Original Message-
> From: Wayne Putterill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 4:03 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Saddam Pret
ald
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
703-300-3911
-Original Message-
From: Wayne Putterill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 4:09 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack
You may not know of the Lancet, but it is one of the top journals in the
world
03-300-3911
-Original Message-
From: Wayne Putterill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 4:03 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack
Your valid point was an attempt at an insult, yes I responded to your insult
with another flippan
t has a max of 37,000 right now.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Wayne Putterill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 3:50 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack
> >
> >
Era Marine Uncle.
>
> --
> Tim Heald
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 703-300-3911
> -Original Message-
> From: Wayne Putterill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 3:50 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attac
;>>>>>
> >> or
> >>
> >>>> did
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>> not exist at this point.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> BTW Why is that "spin"? Are all of my statements true?
>
1
-Original Message-
From: Wayne Putterill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 3:50 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack
The Lancet.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3962969.stm
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp
::sigh:: Your reply is exactly beside the point as I am not questioning whether
the Taliban were bad people (see rawa.org if anyone has any doubt) only whether
this really is why we are there and whether we really have improved things. By
the way, since when do we invade countries over the abuse
0 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack
>
> The Lancet.
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3962969.stm
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7967-2004Oct28.html
> etc.
>
> On 3/17/06,
Source that number. Your saying we have killed over 100,000 civilians,
right?
--
Tim Heald
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
703-300-3911
-Original Message-
From: Wayne Putterill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 3:43 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have
t;>>> not exist at this point.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW Why is that "spin"? Are all of my statements true?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How about you stop with America bashing bullshit? And the
>>>>>>
-
> > From: Wayne Putterill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 3:43 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack
> >
> > That is very debatable, well over 100,000 dead civilians would proba
this point.
> >>>>
> >>>> BTW Why is that "spin"? Are all of my statements true?
> >>>>
> >>>> How about you stop with America bashing bullshit? And the
> anti-Semitic
> >>>> bullshit that you lefties like to
::sigh:: Your reply is exactly beside the point as I am not questioning whether
the Taliban were bad people (see rawa.org if anyone has any doubt) only whether
this really is why we are there and whether we really have improved things. By
the way, since when do we invade countries over the abuse
100,000? Where exactly did that number come from?
> -Original Message-
> From: Wayne Putterill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 3:43 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack
>
> That is very
of sitting around bitching you actually stand for something,
>>>>
>> with
>>
>>>> not only your principles, but your life on the line?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Tim Heald
>>>> [EMAIL P
That is very debatable, well over 100,000 dead civilians would probably
think not.
On 3/17/06, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So, haven't we made the world a better place for the Iraqi people? Aren't
> they more free because of our actions?
>
>
>
ut your life on the line?
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Tim Heald
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> 703-300-3911
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Wayne Putterill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Friday, March 17,
Israel
Their program is still listed as allegedly because there have never been any
nuclear tests, no missiles seen, no missiles used, and no missiles even said
to exist. The only reason anyone knows about it is because of a whistle
blower. Of course, Israel is not signed to the nuclear non-prol
irst gulf war. Iran and Iraq may have
> > gone
> > > to war and not liked each other very much, but when the chips were down
> > they
> > > were playing on the same team.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Tim Heald
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > &g
ty
Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack
I'm not anti american, I'm anti anyone who makes this world a worse place to
be.
I'm not bashing america, my own country had a large part in this disgusting
affair.
As for calling me antisemetic, anyone who knows m
*falls over*
*twitch* *twitch*
info...overload...scrolling...scrolling..ack..ack...*
^_^
On 3/17/06, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.iaea.org/NewsCenter/Statements/2003/ebsp2003n006.shtml
~|
Message: http:
r principles, but your life on the line?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Tim Heald
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 703-300-3911
>> -----Original Message-
>> From: Wayne Putterill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 11:51 AM
>> To: CF-Comm
, with
> not only your principles, but your life on the line?
>
>
> --
> Tim Heald
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 703-300-3911
> -Original Message-
> From: Wayne Putterill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 11:51 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject:
gone
> > to war and not liked each other very much, but when the chips were down
> they
> > were playing on the same team.
> >
> > --
> > Tim Heald
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 703-300-3911
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: Larry C. Lyons [ma
recently because of Duelfer's appeal and that the
>> Defense Department routinely reviews detainees' status to see "whether
>> or not they are a threat to the coalition and Iraqi security forces
>> and whether or not they continue to have intelligence value."
&g
/news/2004/01/25/wirq25.xml&sSheet=/news/2004/01/25/ixnewstop.html
>>
>> "David Kay, the former head of the coalition's hunt for Iraq's weapons
>> of mass destruction, yesterday claimed that part of Saddam Hussein's
>> secret weapons
And yet it's still mentioned by at least one of Saddam's people. But to be
fair, he may have said it to sell books. Got to be skeptical on all, not
selected. :)
> Which was later shown to be incorrect.
>
> What you did not mention was that the only sites and papers still
> playing up this right
t was all over the news, Hell Bill Clinton mentioned it on
> >> David Letterman's show after the invasion.
> >>
> >> Dave asked about it, and Clinton said that there was still a lot of stuff
> >> that had never been accounted for, and while Saddam may have destroye
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo
