yes, but the Lincoln Brigade in Amerika was a youth organization, sort
of a communist boy scouts, take-off on the hitler youth of course,
informing on their parents and that sort of thing) or some such. I
think it was called the Lincoln Brigade, might have been the Lincoln
Corps or something else..
Wasn't the Lincoln Brigade an American unit in the Spanish Civil War?
larry
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:43:48 -0800, William Bowen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > give it time, also I heard they were starting a new organization called The
> > Bush Youth, and everykid gets a new khaki uniform with a ni
> give it time, also I heard they were starting a new organization called The
> Bush Youth, and everykid gets a new khaki uniform with a nice shiny bible
> free of charge.
Nah, they'll call it the Lincoln Brigade (a la Amerika a 1987miniseries)
the brown and bible sounds about right for a uni
Beats me...
At 03:47 PM 1/19/2005, you wrote:
>hatway reay ouyay alkingtay boutay?
>
>--- On Wednesday, January 19, 2005 3:45 PM, Dana scribed: ---
> >
> > this is fun, can anybody play?
> >
> > Raclure de bidet, tu oses parler de mouches?
> >
> >> I due delle forcelle sono coperti di mosche
> >
>
> From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> You talkin 'bout the G.W. Bush grammer and pronunseeashun
> guide? I gots me one!
LOL, ya don't say!
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support
efficiency b
ABORTION
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:20:10 -0800, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, having and adult conversation with you seems to be totally out of
> the question.
>
> Let us move on.
>
> HITLER.
>
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:43:57 -0500, Larry C. Lyons
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'll give
You talkin 'bout the G.W. Bush grammer and pronunseeashun guide? I gots me one!
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:54:44 -0500, Michael T. Tangorre
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > There's a difference? I thought it just depended on how much
> > room you had on the page.
> From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> There's a difference? I thought it just depended on how much
> room you had on the page.
I guess it depends more on your political party affiliation. Maybe it's the
over_republican English dialect?
~~
There's a difference? I thought it just depended on how much room you
had on the page.
> I'm going to bet you actually do know the difference between AND and AN.
> :-)
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and T
> From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> So, having and adult conversation with you seems to be
> totally out of the question.
>
> Let us move on.
>
> HITLER.
I'm going to bet you actually do know the difference between AND and AN.
:-)
~~~
So, having and adult conversation with you seems to be totally out of
the question.
Let us move on.
HITLER.
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:43:57 -0500, Larry C. Lyons
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll give you a hint, remember what the shrub apologist was complaining about.
>
> larry
>
> On Wed, 19
Ok, I'll buy that. He isn't an idiot. He believes his own BS.
Actually, I find it hard to decide whether he is very stupid or very
smart. Either way he is a huge danger to the US and to the American
people, though -- I firmly believe that he fails to see possible
consequences to his actions that ar
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:52:07 -0500, John Stanley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> my bad, what about lederhosen?
Filled with cream cheese. Oh man.
Wait.
Nevermind.
-Kevin
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's custom
Wednesday, January 19, 2005 2:52 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: sam, I am not saying a word
my bad, what about lederhosen?
-Original Message-
From: Russel Madere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 3:50 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: sam, I am not saying a word
uary 19, 2005 3:50 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: sam, I am not saying a word
>
> No, it's the Kerry Youth associated with his new "Reformed Catholic
> Church" that allows abortion. The uniform is too much like a Catholic
> school uniform for Bush to
my bad, what about lederhosen?
-Original Message-
From: Russel Madere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 3:50 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: sam, I am not saying a word
No, it's the Kerry Youth associated with his new "Reformed Catholic
Church&qu
ssage-
From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 2:35 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: sam, I am not saying a word
give it time, also I heard they were starting a new organization called
The
Bush Youth, and everykid gets a new khaki uniform with a nice shin
pun. Actually means two of spades.
Dana
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:39:50 -0500, John Stanley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>Deux de pique.
>
> Two piques? ;-0
~|
Protect your mail server with built in anti-virus protection. It's n
hatway reay ouyay alkingtay boutay?
--- On Wednesday, January 19, 2005 3:45 PM, Dana scribed: ---
>
> this is fun, can anybody play?
>
> Raclure de bidet, tu oses parler de mouches?
>
>> I due delle forcelle sono coperti di mosche
>
>
~~
like the Bill OReillys.
>
> Russel Madere
> Webmaster
> 504.832.9835
> SunShine Pages by EATEL
> www.sunshinepages.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 1:51 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re:
this is fun, can anybody play?
Raclure de bidet, tu oses parler de mouches?
> I due delle forcelle sono coperti di mosche
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble
Ticket application
http://www.house
I'll give you a hint, remember what the shrub apologist was complaining about.
larry
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:39:50 -0500, John Stanley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>Deux de pique.
>
> Two piques? ;-0
>
>
~|
Find out how CFTi
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:11:59 -0700, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Me: Haile Berry was caught on video doing Julia Roberts
Ew.
Link?
-Kevin
~|
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The pl
e.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 3:13 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: sam, I am not saying a word
>
> you mean he hasn't?
>
> Dana
>
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:07:10 -0500, Jo
>>Deux de pique.
Two piques? ;-0
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.c
Deux de pique.
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:22:51 -0800, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you forget to take your meds today?
>
>
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:11:59 -0700, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ::light bulb:: maybe I should just start doing the same thing
> >
> > Sam: blah blah blah Hus
Subject: Re: sam, I am not saying a word
you mean he hasn't?
Dana
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:07:10 -0500, John Stanley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>pssstI heard he wants to reinstate the Sedition Act of
> 1798.pass it on...
>
>
> -Original Message
> From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I'm going to bet your not mature enough to apologize :)
>
> I due delle forcelle sono coperti di mosche
I'm going to bet you actually do know the difference between YOUR and YOU'RE
:-)
~~~
I'm going to bet your not mature enough to apologize :)
I due delle forcelle sono coperti di mosche
> Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But then again Clinton is a good scape goat for republican apologists.
> By blaming him it covers all sorts of lack of thinking.
~~~
You're right, we do speak different dialects.
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:16:33 -0700, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nipples to you. It's a favoured Pamela Anderson tactic of yours and
> you Haile Berry know it.
>
> dana
>
>
~|
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Chinagate - was (sam, I am not saying a word)
why do you always bring up clinton when bush is criticized? I don't
have time to look at the links right nw -- though I may later -- but
isn't the point what bush is doing now? And possibly could be
prevented fro
Did you forget to take your meds today?
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:11:59 -0700, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ::light bulb:: maybe I should just start doing the same thing
>
> Sam: blah blah blah Hussein massacres WMD imminent danger
>
> Me: Pamela Anderson is planning to breastfeed her first
Nipples to you. It's a favoured Pamela Anderson tactic of yours and
you Haile Berry know it.
dana
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:11:47 -0800, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wasn't me, it was Ken.
>
> Ken:
> "I think back to the constant attacks on Clinton and his staff and
> supporters. They were at
AIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 2:59 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: sam, I am not saying a word
>
>
> Ok, I'll buy that. He isn't an idiot. He believes his own BS.
> Actually, I find it hard to decide whether he is very stupid or very
> smart. Eit
::light bulb:: maybe I should just start doing the same thing
Sam: blah blah blah Hussein massacres WMD imminent danger
Me: Pamela Anderson is planning to breastfeed her first child
Sam: You're an idot. You're all idots. Just wait, pretty soon you
won't have Sam to kick around any more.
Me: Hai
Wasn't me, it was Ken.
Ken:
"I think back to the constant attacks on Clinton and his staff and
supporters. They were attacked from a every possible angle at every
opportunity. Much of which was just bs. Then Bush and the good 'ol
boys get in and they are beyond reproach. It kills me. Bush and
pssstI heard he wants to reinstate the Sedition Act of
1798.pass it on...
-Original Message-
From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 2:59 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: sam, I am not saying a word
Ok, I'll buy that. He isn'
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:50:55 -0700, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> why do you always bring up clinton when bush is criticized? I don't
> have time to look at the links right nw -- though I may later -- but
> isn't the point what bush is doing now? And possibly could be
> prevented from doing if
> From: G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Agreed.
>
> The "bush is an idiot" line is getting old too. Both should
> be retired.
Bush is such an idiot. :)
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble
Tic
> Dana wrote:
> except he is still *being* an idiot though. How can anyone shut up
> when constantly provided with new material like that?
>
I don't think he's an idiot, but certainly misguided and probably
suffering from an inflated ego; the translation being that he and his
staff believe their
why do you always bring up clinton when bush is criticized? I don't
have time to look at the links right nw -- though I may later -- but
isn't the point what bush is doing now? And possibly could be
prevented from doing if enough people paid attention? I am beginning
to suspect that this is the poi
One is still Pres. And as long as he continues to do things that
people think are stupid, the label will stick.
-Kevin
> The "bush is an idiot" line is getting old too. Both should be retired.
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increa
Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pakistan and India have recently tested IRBM's that have fairly
> accurate guidence systems. Moreover, both nations have nuclear capable
> fighter bombers.
Where did they get the technology?
China!
Thank you President Clinton.
> As for China, remember
except he is still *being* an idiot though. How can anyone shut up
when constantly provided with new material like that?
gd,r
Dana
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:40:32 -0600, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agreed.
>
> The "bush is an idiot" line is getting old too. Both should be retired.
>
>
> >I kn
Agreed.
The "bush is an idiot" line is getting old too. Both should be retired.
>I know. The "but Clinton did x" line is getting really old.
>
>
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble
Ticket
I know. The "but Clinton did x" line is getting really old.
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:10:04 -0500, Larry C. Lyons
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pakistan and India have recently tested IRBM's that have fairly
> accurate guidence systems. Moreover, both nations have nuclear capable
> fighter bombers.
Pakistan and India have recently tested IRBM's that have fairly
accurate guidence systems. Moreover, both nations have nuclear capable
fighter bombers.
As for China, remember they were selling very accurate missle systems
well before Clinton, remember the Silkworm? Funny how you blame
Clinton on t
Maybe the president should be more precise then:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/10/20021005.html
> -Original Message-
> From: John Elder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 1:23 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: sam, I am no
I'm going by what the President gave as his central reason. Not a
hodgepodge of sentences scattered about by different members of the
administration. The threat Saddam posed to the world by the
possibility he had the weapons and his refusing to prove he didn't.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea
> Sam wrote:
> People have lost faith in the bias of the liberal major media and it's
> finally they have to change there ways. Just look at CNN and CBS,
> nobody watches them anymore. What a great thing :).
People have lost their concept of what News is - these days News is
mixed with commentary,
That is false.
According to George Bush the central reason for going to war was that he had
stockpiles of WMD and was therefore a clear and present
danger to the United States and to the world. You can misremember as much as
you want, but htat was what your president said and
what he put forward
> I don't remember Bush say he had stockpiles. He said he had the
> materials to make the stockpiles of weapons and hasn't accounted for
> them or given any evidence that he has destroyed them.
Holy cow, really?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A5006-2005Jan12.html
http://www.rotten.
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:37:43 -0500, Jerry Johnson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you talk about the Republican National Convention, and the false arrests
> and detentions there? They were let go eventually, but why again were they
> arrested?
Never heard about it.
> Can you talk about the fac
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:06:05 -0400, Angel Stewart
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FACT: Iraq did NOT have the stockpiles of WMD that George Bush said he did.
> You trying to quote sources, and find reasons for this fact doesn't change it.
I don't remember Bush say he had stockpiles. He said he had th
ROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 6:40 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: sam, I am not saying a word
>
> Oh yeah :) John Stanley said that, I believe. And all of us except Sam
> know that he was joking. Mostly. I think. LOL. I laughed, anyway. I
> mean, considering the
Can you talk about the Republican National Convention, and the false arrests
and detentions there? They were let go eventually, but why again were they
arrested?
Can you talk about the fact that only vetted people who sign loyalty oaths are
allowed in to speeches given by the President or the Vi
--
From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 6:40 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: sam, I am not saying a word
Oh yeah :) John Stanley said that, I believe. And all of us except Sam
know that he was joking. Mostly. I think. LOL. I laughed, anyway. I
mean, considering the Wa
FACT: Iraq did NOT have the stockpiles of WMD that George Bush said he did.
You trying to quote sources, and find reasons for this fact doesn't change it.
FACT: ""So,therefore: one, we need to find out what went wrong in the
intelligence gathering."
Your posting of Bush's quote does not change th
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 21:14:19 -0400, Angel Stewart
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quite simply, my point is this:
>
> FACT: George Bush's central reason for going to war in Iraq was that Iraq had
> large stockpiles of Weapons of Mass Destruction which
> were a clear and present danger to the United
Quite simply, my point is this:
FACT: George Bush's central reason for going to war in Iraq was that Iraq had
large stockpiles of Weapons of Mass Destruction which
were a clear and present danger to the United States, and indeed to the world.
FACT: Countries around the world, UN Weapons Inspecto
In the words of my countrymen...
eh?
I suddenly wonder if we are speaking different dialects or something.
Dana
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:02:38 -0800, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess you think we started the war on terror.
> Is it because we flaunt our freedoms?
>
>
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2
I guess you think we started the war on terror.
Is it because we flaunt our freedoms?
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:51:20 -0700, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> course there are. Only way we can stay indefinitely at war.
>
> > You seem to think the war on terror means al Qaeda. It doesn't. It's a
>
course there are. Only way we can stay indefinitely at war.
> You seem to think the war on terror means al Qaeda. It doesn't. It's a
> war against extremists that want to destroy us. Al Qaeda is the
> highest profile terrorist organization right now but there are many
> more.
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 05:34:10 -0800, Ken Ketsdever
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you really think that if Iraq could get that info China couldn't? What
> about Pakistan, India, > Israel (unproven), South africa (unproven)
I'm talking about missile guidance systems. None of the other
countries y
yeah, Sam, you're a funny guy :)
Dana
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 16:30:42 -0800, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well your a dumb ass.
>
> Where did you get the idea that Bush made money from this war? Michael
> Moore? Now he's a real dumb ass!
>
> You really think the people vote for Bush is gay ma
Well your a dumb ass.
Where did you get the idea that Bush made money from this war? Michael
Moore? Now he's a real dumb ass!
You really think the people vote for Bush is gay marriage? As long as
you never understand why you lost, you'll never win.
By the way, I was joking about you being a dumb
Oh yeah :) John Stanley said that, I believe. And all of us except Sam
know that he was joking. Mostly. I think. LOL. I laughed, anyway. I
mean, considering the Washington Post reports that the constitutional
amendment concerning gay marriage is now on hold, I bet these people
*really* feel smart.
Sam, I do not recall using the word dumbass. I believe what I said was
mistaken. Possibly deluded :) I definitely remember discussing with
you the difference between ignorance and stupidity. I have been known
to remember wrong, but I since am sure that you will believe what you
choose anyway :) if
Now this is a sticky situation. damn I have to almost use one of Sams
arguments here.
If you look back a message or two someone made a statement to the affect of the
Bush winning the election as referred to those who voted for him as dumbasses.
I simply provided a percentage to his assign
-Community
Subject: Re: Hitler Comparisons (was Re: sam, I am not saying a word)
> It was March, 1991:
>
> http://home.cogeco.ca/~dbonni1/9-3-03-kurds-mark-anniversary-uprising.html
Wow, from reading this it sounds like the Kurds bounced back very well.
Also, the article mentions the
> It was March, 1991:
>
> http://home.cogeco.ca/~dbonni1/9-3-03-kurds-mark-anniversary-uprising.html
Wow, from reading this it sounds like the Kurds bounced back very well.
Also, the article mentions the following:
"In the wake of the 1991 Gulf War that drove Iraqi troops out of
Kuwait, the Kur
http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=m:5:15541:142315
"I think the number you are looking for is 52.5% (number of dumb asses
in this country). At least that is the number someone quoted earlier
in this thread."
I 'm part of the 52%.
I'll respond to the rest later, gotta go.
-sm
n Mon, 1
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/messages.cfm/threadid:15541/forumid:5
and search for dumb.
By saying whomever voted for Bush is a dumb ass, you are including me.
-sm
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 07:28:53 -0700, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I could be wrong about this but right offhand I do no
It was March, 1991:
http://home.cogeco.ca/~dbonni1/9-3-03-kurds-mark-anniversary-uprising.html
--- On Monday, January 17, 2005 12:16 PM, C. Hatton Humphrey scribed: ---
>
> The only date I can find (I don't have the time to do a lot of
> research on it myself) was listed on
> http://www.historygu
Bush promised support to the Kurds and they stage an uprising in March, 1991
(well before Clinton took office) and they were subsequently massacred by
Hussein.
--- On Monday, January 17, 2005 11:51 AM, C. Hatton Humphrey scribed: ---
>
> As far as I can recall our major military actions during
> I'd have to go back and look at dates but it seems to me Bush was in office
> for a good 6
> months or more after the Gulf War and the massacre of Kurds took place during
> that time.
> However, I would have to check the facts adn don't have time right now.
The only date I can find (I don't
> Remember the American Indians?
>
> Besides who ever gives the direct orders for illegal activity. Those orders
> are enver given
> they are implied.
That was the result of one President, Andrew Jackson, who was
responsible for the Trail of Tears and the removal of the Cherokee
from their land
--
From: C. Hatton Humphrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 8:51 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Hitler Comparisons (was Re: sam, I am not saying a word)
> Not to mention that we (the American Government under Bush Sr.) Told the
> Kurds we
> would support them, then
Remember the American Indians?
Besides who ever gives the direct orders for illegal activity. Those orders
are enver given they are implied.
The first and most obvious question in reply to this is when has Bush
(or any US president for that matter) ever directly ordered the
massacare of *AN
> Not to mention that we (the American Government under Bush Sr.) Told the
> Kurds we
> would support them, then we left them out to dry. Go start this and we'll
> back you up.
> Ahh shucks its not really worth it to us sorry. Good luck.
As far as I can recall our major military actions durin
> May I suggest with great respect that even if all of this is true --
> and I know at least some of it is -- it does not reduce the validity
> of the Bush comparison. Hitler would be Hitler even if he were up
> against Genghis Khan, right? Intelligent finger pointing is still
> fingerpointing.
I
Yeah, that was George Bush senior...
--- On Monday, January 17, 2005 10:45 AM, Ken Ketsdever scribed: ---
>
> Not to mention that we (the American Government under Bush Sr.) Told
> the Kurds we would support them, then we left them out to dry. Go
> start this and we'll back you up. Ahh shucks it
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 6:38 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Hitler Comparisons (was Re: sam, I am not saying a word)
Hatton
May I suggest with great respect that even if all of this is true --
and I know at least some of it is -- it does not reduce the validity
of the
Hatton
May I suggest with great respect that even if all of this is true --
and I know at least some of it is -- it does not reduce the validity
of the Bush comparison. Hitler would be Hitler even if he were up
against Genghis Khan, right? Intelligent finger pointing is still
fingerpointing.
By
I could be wrong about this but right offhand I do not recall anyone
calling Sam a dumbass, unless we're talking about the fact that I said
right after the election that I believed he was being misled. I think
this is Rush talking again, you know, the part about how those
liberals think we're stup
ry 2005 13:34
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: sam, I am not saying a word
>
> I compare bush to Hitler because I see the possiblity of history repeating
> itself. Again, that doesn't mean bush is going to kill Jews. remember
> Hitler did more than try to eliminate jews fr
This would be the possible case for invading Iraq for strategic
reasons. We need a friendly base for troops in the area and we picked
Iraq because it was our least favorite country in the area. Cold
perhaps but I'd rather hear this than some bs about how we did it for
freedom. Don't know if I agree
You know...I was against the war in Iraq, but I'm also against Terrorists and
nations that support and encourage their activities.
Iran is one of those countries that has proven itself to be at the center of
several terrorist operations and has also proven that they aren't willing to
stop those ope
> I compare bush to Hitler because I see the possiblity of history repeating
> itself. Again,
> that doesn't mean bush is going to kill Jews. remember Hitler did more than
> try to
> eliminate jews from the world. Including using patriotism as a means of
> rallying support)
> You're with u
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 5:59 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: sam, I am not saying a word
Well...let's think about this.
Is a Nuclear Iran a good thing?
-Gel
-Original Message-
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
If there is a shred of truth in this I
yeah, i dont think it's any of our business. we should worry about our own
problems.
-Original Message-
From: Michael T. Tangorre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 9:01 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: sam, I am not saying a word
> From: Angel Stewart
> From: Angel Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Well...let's think about this.
> Is a Nuclear Iran a good thing?
No more a bad thing than the US trying to muscle the world around. Think
about that.
~|
Find out how CFTicket
Well...let's think about this.
Is a Nuclear Iran a good thing?
-Gel
-Original Message-
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
If there is a shred of truth in this I think maybe someone should end Bush's
second term early...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4180087.stm
Book Deposit
o: CF-Community
Subject: RE: sam, I am not saying a word
I compare bush to Hitler because I see the possiblity of history repeating
itself. Again, that doesn't mean bush is going to kill Jews. remember
Hitler did more than try to eliminate jews from the world. Including using
patriotism as
o: CF-Community
Subject: RE: sam, I am not saying a word
I compare bush to Hitler because I see the possiblity of history repeating
itself. Again, that doesn't mean bush is going to kill Jews. remember
Hitler did more than try to eliminate jews from the world. Including using
patriotism as
I compare bush to Hitler because I see the possiblity of history repeating
itself. Again, that doesn't mean bush is going to kill Jews. remember Hitler
did more than try to eliminate jews from the world. Including using patriotism
as a means of rallying support) You're with us or against us.
Heh, not sure it was incredulity, exactly, but I'd remembered thinking that
Hitler's rise to power was more of a power grab, cloaked in
democracythan a true election.
Either way though, I think your point is valid that the people rallied
around his nationalistic rhetoric for some of the rea
There is a case to be made for invasion for strategic purposes. I am
not sure I would agree with it but then no attempt to make it so my
confusion is, I think, understandable.
Dana
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 22:33:58 -0600, Aaron Rouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If they went for the reason that I thi
If they went for the reason that I think and will keep to myself, then
I fully support them.
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:15:56 -0700, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That inference certainly seems to be increasingly supported by the
> evidence. By the way, did anybody else notice that we cut the hec
That inference certainly seems to be increasingly supported by the
evidence. By the way, did anybody else notice that we cut the heck out
of the budget for housing and urban development yesterday?
Dana
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 22:11:50 -0600, Aaron Rouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> More like the cent
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
