Going OT (was: X-server?

2002-08-01 Thread Sean A Corfield
On Thursday, August 1, 2002, at 11:42 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just for argument's sake - in a P4 (2.54Ghz), it is VERY difficult to get up to $4,300. I spec'ed out what you just said, included a 17 flat screen, 80GB HD, etc, and I didn't come up with $4300. Much closer to $3500. The

Going OT (was: X-server?

2002-08-01 Thread Sean A Corfield
On Thursday, August 1, 2002, at 11:17 , Neil Robertson-Ravo =TMM= wrote: I think price is not really issue at the mo (surely peripherals are so cheap that building your own is probably cheaper!?) Neither I nor my wife can be bothered with that - we want a standard, vendor-supported machine.

Re: Email lists

2002-08-01 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
bah html email is the best thing to happen to email :) Better than attachments eh? ... html has zero to do with the purpose of email ... and personally I have yet to see it actually improve the viewing / reading experience... I realize that puts me on the other side of the fence from most

Re: X-server?

2002-08-01 Thread Dick Applebaum
On Thursday, August 1, 2002, at 12:29 PM, Jesse Noller wrote: But my OS is better. And Cheaper. OS/2 WARP WILL NEVER DIE. Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Macromedia Server Development Unix/Linux special guy If CP/M can't do it, it's not worth doing! Dick

RE: X-server?

2002-08-01 Thread Dave Watts
Good points, but they are still not sturdy enough for hi-end client or any type of server environment. I know you are a Mac-man and indeed will push it much like a Microsoftian :-p but in this case you can go on and on about it, and it will still always come down to the fact that

Re: regexp

2002-08-01 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
The IsNumeric() approach is better than using RegEx. Less overhead. cfif not isnumeric(form.job_amount) cfset error_message = blah blah... /cfif And after I went and poked fun at you, you backed me up. :) Isaac Dealey Certified Advanced ColdFusion Developer www.turnkey.to 954-776-0046

RE: SSL on form submission

2002-08-01 Thread Tony Schreiber
But from the users perspective, the form is NOT secure (no warm, fuzzy lock icon) and they don't know (or have any reason to then expect) that the form submission will be secure... Ah... Thanks guys... My curiosity is cured. That was going to bug me the rest of the day... :)

RE: regexp

2002-08-01 Thread Patrick McElhaney
Not so fast, mister! The function you describe would be more appropriately named isInteger(). ;-) Patrick -Original Message- From: S.Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 3:42 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: regexp Try this: ^[0-9]+$ A string

Re: regexp

2002-08-01 Thread Michael Dinowitz
Well, he asked for RegEx and I gave him RegEx. The IsNumeric is better but I got directly into teaching mode. :) Try this: ^[0-9]+$ A string must start (^) with a number ([0-9]), at least one number must exist (+) and the string ends after one or more numbers ($). Oooh oooh! ...

Re: regexp

2002-08-01 Thread todd
Not to mention isNumeric() in J's post is ... well, illegal. It already exist in CF and it'll throw an error. Heh, to bad we can overwrite those functions like you can in flash. ;) ~Todd On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Michael Dinowitz wrote: Well, he asked for RegEx and I gave him RegEx. The

Re: regexp

2002-08-01 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
Well, he asked for RegEx and I gave him RegEx. The IsNumeric is better but I got directly into teaching mode. :) Yea, it happens to all of us at one point or another. :) I wish I could get paid for teaching this stuff, that would be awesome. :) Isaac Dealey Certified Advanced ColdFusion

RE: regexp

2002-08-01 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
Not so fast, mister! The function you describe would be more appropriately named isInteger(). ;-) Patrick Aha! The brass comes out. :) Yea, you're right... I'm sure there was a rationalle for IsNumeric() validating integers... I guess then there is a case for using REGex in a function to

Re: X-server?

2002-08-01 Thread Dick Applebaum
On Thursday, August 1, 2002, at 12:12 PM, Neil Robertson-Ravo =TMM= wrote: Hi Dick :-) Good points, but they are still not sturdy enough for hi-end client or any type of server environment. I know you are a Mac-man and indeed will push it much like a Microsoftian :-p but in this case

Re: regexp

2002-08-01 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
Not to mention isNumeric() in J's post is ... well, illegal. It already exist in CF and it'll throw an error. Heh, to bad we can overwrite those functions like you can in flash. ;) Who's J? ... Yea, I knew it was illegal, it was just for the purpose of the jab. :) I could have said function

RE: regexp

2002-08-01 Thread Mark A. Kruger - CFG
You could use a snippet... -Original Message- From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 3:21 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: regexp Not to mention isNumeric() in J's post is ... well, illegal. It already exist in CF and it'll throw an error. Heh,

RE: regexp

2002-08-01 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
You could use a snippet... LOL... I had 2 simultaneous mixed responses to this: 1) Oooh oooh! ... wait ... nope, nevermind, you lost me... and 2) Now that's just silly. Isaac Dealey Certified Advanced ColdFusion Developer www.turnkey.to 954-776-0046 -Original Message- From: S.

Show debug output (easy slice of cheese to the winner)

2002-08-01 Thread Eric Hoffman
cfsetting showdebugoutput=Yes Put in my application.cfm, the templates do not append the debug info at the end of the templates. What have I missed? Regards, Eric J Hoffman DataStream Connexion www.datastreamconnexion.com Delivering Creative Data Solutions

Re: regexp

2002-08-01 Thread Michael Dinowitz
Just to bring this thread back onto topic and then end it, Mastering Regular Expessions 2 is out. http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/regex2/ The best price is at buy.com while the best chance of getting it within the next week or two is going directly to O'Reilly.

RE: Show debug output (easy slice of cheese to the winner)

2002-08-01 Thread Ken Beard
is it setup in the admin? is there another of these tags in one of those files that sets it back to no? -Original Message- From: Eric Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 4:28 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Show debug output (easy slice of cheese to the winner)

RE: Show debug output (easy slice of cheese to the winner)

2002-08-01 Thread Raymond Camden
You have to enable debugoutput in the admin as well - and double check that the ip isn't restricted to an ip you're not testing from. === Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Macromedia Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo

RE: Show debug output (easy slice of cheese to the winner)

2002-08-01 Thread Eric Hoffman
Shared server, no idea in adminno other tags giving any other directive. This setting in application.cfm should override anything setup at the host I imagine. Regards, Eric J Hoffman DataStream Connexion www.datastreamconnexion.com Delivering Creative Data Solutions -Original

Re: regexp

2002-08-01 Thread Alex
[^0-9] On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Kodjo Ackah wrote: Hi, The snippet below does check to ensure that a user puts in a digit in a form. The problem is - if I test this code like adding a letter to the digit it does not flag the error. I will like to ensure that only digits are allowed and if

RE: Show debug output (easy slice of cheese to the winner)

2002-08-01 Thread Mark A. Kruger - CFG
2 things, first, you have to enable debug in the CF administrator AND you have to add your IP address to the list of Ips enabled for debugging. You will see the debug info without having to use the cfsetting showdebugoutput=yes setting. Instead, you will use this attribute to turn debugging

Schedule Task

2002-08-01 Thread Bryan F. Hogan
Guys I might be dumb here, but I have a routine that it set to run from 8am to 10pm every 60 minutes. My file deletes files on the server recreates and then populates with info from database. After which the information is deleted from the database and another server picks the file up and then

Re: regexp

2002-08-01 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
Just to bring this thread back onto topic and then end it, Mastering Regular Expessions 2 is out. http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/regex2/ The best price is at buy.com while the best chance of getting it within the next week or two is going directly to O'Reilly. Sorry Mike. :) Isaac Dealey

watching a form for illegal SQL characters

2002-08-01 Thread Chad Gray
Can anyone recommend a good way to filter ' etc out of forms so on the action page the SQL does not crash? __ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting.

RESOLVED: CFX_CyberCash

2002-08-01 Thread Steve Johnson
CFX_CyberCash will likely never be updated to work with CFMX since Verisign wants everyone to move to PayFlowPro. since i'm not ready to do that (and since their PayFlowPro tag doesn't work reliably in CFMX yet either), i wrote my own custom tag which calls out to their Perl MCK using

Re: Schedule Task

2002-08-01 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
Guys I might be dumb here, but I have a routine that it set to run from 8am to 10pm every 60 minutes. My file deletes files on the server recreates and then populates with info from database. After which the information is deleted from the database and another server picks the file up and

RE: Email lists

2002-08-01 Thread Chad Gray
It depends on the email that sent the spam. It also depends on if it looks like they are using a shotgun to hit emails. A lot of times I will see in the TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], mike... etc... like they are just guessing. I just forward the spam to abuse emails if they come

RE: X-server?

2002-08-01 Thread Ryan Kime
Speaking of OS/2.you can now run that on Virtual PC (Mac or Windows) -Original Message- From: Jesse Noller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 2:30 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: X-server? But my OS is better. And Cheaper. OS/2 WARP WILL NEVER DIE. Jesse

RE: Schedule Task

2002-08-01 Thread Bryan F. Hogan
I kind of had a feeling this was the case. Thanks. If it still fails I'm just going to batch it with Windows. -Original Message- From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 5:22 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Schedule Task Guys I might be dumb here,

Re: watching a form for illegal SQL characters

2002-08-01 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Chad Gray wrote: Can anyone recommend a good way to filter ' etc out of forms so on the action page the SQL does not crash? cfqueryparam Jochem __ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at

Re: watching a form for illegal SQL characters

2002-08-01 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
Can anyone recommend a good way to filter ' etc out of forms so on the action page the SQL does not crash? There's no need to filter single or double quotes out of the form to prevent sql from erroring unless you're also using PreserveSingleQuotes() ... CF escapes single quotes automatically

RE: watching a form for illegal SQL characters

2002-08-01 Thread Chad Gray
Is that a new tag? I see it mentioned a few times and I have never used it. I will start reading. :) -Original Message- From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 4:30 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: watching a form for illegal SQL characters Chad

CFFILE

2002-08-01 Thread Bruce, Rodney S HQISEC/SIGNAL
Hello all Does anyone know how to run CFFILE without passing it a form field name. Want to copy files from one directory to another on the same server, but when I try CFDIRECTORY ACTION=LIST DIRECTORY=c:\dir1 NAME=getfiles CFOUTPUT query=getfiles CFIF getfiles.name NEQ . and getfiles.name NEQ

Re: watching a form for illegal SQL characters

2002-08-01 Thread Paul Giesenhagen
Nope, CFQUERYPARAM is a super great tag, it has many plus's, but the interesting one is that it boosts performance on queries. It's kinda inbetween not using stored proceedures and stored proceedures ... it allows the database server to prefigure-out the query so it doesn't have to do it over

RE: Schedule Task

2002-08-01 Thread Debbie Dickerson
Here's how it's supposed to work: Task Scheduling: When cfexec.exe is started up, and again at intervals of [Scheduler Refresh Interval] minutes, cfexec updates a list of scheduled tasks which is kept in memory. --Only tasks with a Start Date less than or equal to the Current Date are

RE: CFFILE

2002-08-01 Thread Bruce, Rodney S HQISEC/SIGNAL
if I try CFFILE ACTION=COPY I get these errors The parameter is incorrect. (error 87). The device is not ready. (error 21). -Original Message- From: Bruce, Rodney S HQISEC/SIGNAL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 2:37 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: CFFILE Hello all

Re: CFFILE

2002-08-01 Thread Paul Giesenhagen
Try the copy cffile action=COPY source=c:\inetpub\getfiles.name# destination=c:\wwwroot\#getfiles.name# Paul Giesenhagen QuillDesign - Original Message - From: Bruce, Rodney S HQISEC/SIGNAL [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 4:37 PM

Re: X-server?

2002-08-01 Thread Bud
On 8/1/02, Dick Applebaum penned: I will challenge you on the development side. Me too. Anything I do on my Mac gets done much quicker than when I try and do the same thing on Windows. Just little things, like when I want to hilite and select a block of text. Click, drag, and when you get to

Calling Queries

2002-08-01 Thread Sam Farmer
Hi, I am trying to rewrite an old custom tag of ours that takes in a query and outputs it with right options selected. Nothing too tricky...except that I can not work out how to get around using evaluate. Anyone got any pointers? This is the code: cfoutput query=caller.#attributes.query#

CF MX Errors

2002-08-01 Thread Jon Hall
I just tried to pull up my MX server and for some reason I can not get any pages to come up. Everything seems fine, Jrun.exe is loaded and taking up no CPU. So I go take a look at the Event Viewer. At 1:17pm I got around 20 of these errors: The Open Procedure for service ColdFusion MX

RE: Can anybody see a problem with this?

2002-08-01 Thread Bill Henderson
Dan - you wrote: 2) In IIS, for that directory or subdomain, go to properties and choose the directory tab. Change the 'When connecting to this resource, the content should come from:' option to 'A redirection to a URL', and enter in the redirect to box /people.cfm?person=$0. (use the help on

RE: Calling Queries

2002-08-01 Thread Raymond Camden
In this case, I believe you do need to use evaluate (unless you are on MX!). However, your code will use N evaluates, where N is the rowcount. You can get around this by doing one: cfset theQuery = evaluate(caller.#attributes.query#) Then your code gets MUCH easier: cfoutput query=theQuery

Re: watching a form for illegal SQL characters

2002-08-01 Thread Jochem van Dieten
S. Isaac Dealey wrote: Can anyone recommend a good way to filter ' etc out of forms so on the action page the SQL does not crash? There's no need to filter single or double quotes out of the form to prevent sql from erroring unless you're also using PreserveSingleQuotes() ... CF escapes

RE: watching a form for illegal SQL characters

2002-08-01 Thread Chad Gray
Yikes... cfqueryparam value=#Form.SubLongDesc# cfsqltype=CF_SQL_LONGVARCHAR maxlength=255 Turned this type: The soft, meditative light from our 3” x 3’ pillars Into This type: The soft, meditative light from our 3Ã?Æ?Ã?¢Ã?¢ââ?¬Å¡Ã?¬Ã?â??Ã? x 3Ã?Æ?Ã?¢Ã?¢ââ?¬Å¡Ã?¬Ã?¢ââ?¬Å¾Ã?¢

RE: Schedule Task

2002-08-01 Thread Bryan F. Hogan
Thanks -Original Message- From: Debbie Dickerson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 5:41 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Schedule Task Here's how it's supposed to work: Task Scheduling: When cfexec.exe is started up, and again at intervals of [Scheduler Refresh

Re: SSL on form submission

2002-08-01 Thread Jon Hall
This also happens to be my problem with the Pet Store Flash app. Where is the lock? -- Jon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, August 1, 2002, 3:57:21 PM, you wrote: TS But from the users perspective, the form is NOT secure (no warm, fuzzy TS lock icon) and they don't know (or have any reason

RE: Can anybody see a problem with this?

2002-08-01 Thread Dan Haley
That would mean making the root directory a redirect, which I don't think you want to do, unless none of your other URLs are at the root. Sure you can't convince him to use a subdomain? bossman.mydomain.com? Some kind of ego boost to get him to go for it? On the mod_rewrite, I'm not following

RE: CFFILE

2002-08-01 Thread Ben Doom
: CFFILE ACTION=UPLOAD FILEFIELD=#filetomove# DESTINATION=D:\temp\ : NAMECONFLICT=ERROR This action assumes that someone is uploading a file thru the web. You want something like: cffile action=copy source=c:\source.txt destination=d:\backup\ You may want to check against the directory you're

Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Bonnie E. Betts
Is it me, or has anyone else noticed there's a REALLY strong push for = Flash lately at all the CFUGs and conferences?? Is there any particular = reason for this? I like Flash - don't get me wrong. But I view it as a GUI frill that I = doubt I can sell to my clients who want a functional

SQL_standard?_was_Re:_watching_a_form_for_illegal_SQL_characters

2002-08-01 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
S. Isaac Dealey wrote: There's no need to filter single or double quotes out of the form to prevent sql from erroring unless you're also using PreserveSingleQuotes() ... CF escapes single quotes automatically and since the string is bound by single quotes, double-quotes produce no

RE: watching a form for illegal SQL characters

2002-08-01 Thread Kwang Suh
You didn't happen to take the phrase from, say, a Word document, paste it into a form field, and then submit it? -Original Message- From: Chad Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 4:01 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: watching a form for illegal SQL characters

Re: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Todd
I think Flash Remoting has some pretty powerful advantages, but... I don't think they have pushing Flash anymore than they already have been for years. I think people will slowly start to come out with some powerful Flash Remoting (aka Rich Clients) that will blow away some of the regular

RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Nathaniel Horwitz
I'm assuming in the future when everyone has DSL or Cable. Flash is a viable client side application you can push to your clients since it works well with dynamic languages such as ColdFusion. Nathaniel -Original Message- From: Bonnie E. Betts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday,

Re: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Critz
oi Bonnie!! I don't think the push is to be over and above coldfusion.but to compliment it. It seems their biggest push is to get away from the skip intro stereotype of flash, but to show it can be used for web application..with a pretty front end. - Critz Macromedia

RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Fitch, Tyler
I'll admit I'm pretty much a brain washed MM Partner, but I'd say they're pushing Flash for a number of reasons. 1) You can build a full web application with it now via Flash Remoting. VERY easily I might add. 2) It isn't just for movies and intros, BUT the public still thinks it is, we as

RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Dave Watts
Is it me, or has anyone else noticed there's a REALLY strong push for Flash lately at all the CFUGs and conferences?? Is there any particular reason for this? Sure. MM sells CF, MM sells Flash, MM would like more money! On a more serious note, though, I think that MM's strategy is to push

RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Matthew Walker
To me it's not a matter of selling them ColdFusion or selling them Flash. You sell them an application. Whether it uses HTML or Flash as the interface is a detail. Our company is about to rebuild a CMS, and we'll be switching from dHTML to Flash for the trickier parts of the interface (e.g. drag

RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Vernon Viehe
Macromedia's push for Flash is not about over and above CF development. It's about separating application functionality from content display. This is win-win for both the website visitor and your business clients: A number of companies have already saved tons of money in bandwidth cost - I

Re: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Bonnie E. Betts
Hmmm, seems I've got that stereotype as well then. Ok I could sell 3 and 4 easily enough to the IT Director. I personally find skip intro stuff a waste of my time and view it as appropriate for entertainment sites and sales pitches. Anyone have any links for sample sites using Flash in a

Re: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Dick Applebaum
Also, features like Flash Remoting allow a much more robust client-side tier of an application. I certainly am no expert, but understand that an intelligent Flash client can dynamically generate and invoke SQL requests and Web services with much of the logic at the client and efficient,

RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Todd
My only issue with the Rich Client thing is... well... there's only one branden hall in the world and Mr. Watts, I'm sure you're doing a good job keeping him busy. Seriously, to truly be a good developer into Flash Remoting, I think we'd have to have that much knowledge, because as it

RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Matt Liotta
1) You can build a full web application with it now via Flash Remoting. VERY easily I might add. Easily as compared to what? Certainly not as compared to just HTML and CFML. 3) Server load, if you build an application with Flash, the amount of data that needs to be pushed back and forth

Re: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Bonnie E. Betts
Here we go this is a little of what I'm looking for: we'll be switching from dHTML to Flash for the trickier parts of the interface (e.g. drag and drop pages, building trees, etc). It's just easier for us and more reliable. Would luv more of this (well, and links showing this in

Re: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Bonnie E. Betts
Well another problem is that Flash is associated as a tool for graphics artists. The IT departments I've been dealing with are full to the hilt with programmers and no creatives. And the prejudice is you need to be a graphics person to create any decent Flash. Bonnie E. Betts [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Dan Haley
Agreed ... I've been working a side project in Flash, and luckily most of my time is spent in CFStudio writing ActionScript to control objects that someone else has developed in Flash. When I have to manipulate things in Flash I tend to be glad there's a punching bag in the basement! Some

Re: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
Anyone have any links for sample sites using Flash in a business application? I remember Dave Watts posting a message with a link to an org-chart that was done in Flash in response to a post about org-charts built on CF... Though when I looked at it, I must admit, I found it very confusing ...

RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Fitch, Tyler
-Original Message- From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 4:34 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda? 1) You can build a full web application with it now via Flash Remoting. VERY easily I might add.

Re: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Jon Hall
Well there is a vacuum right now in this particular space. Java applets have fallen into disfavor as a rich client platform. ActiveX has always had negatives, and is being replaced with .Net ever so slowly. So if there ever was a time to push Flash the time is now I guess. Reasons to sell Flash?

RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Matt Liotta
I solved the Flash MX problem by hiring one of the guys who wrote the Flash MX certification test and is writing the accompanying book. I also know at least two other Flash MX developers in the Bay Area that are up to speed on Flash remoting now. Matt Liotta President CEO Montara Software, Inc.

RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Matt Liotta
Compared to Flash 5. Well that doesn't have very much appeal for ColdFusion people without Flash experience. Etrade has a stock quote component on their home page. People would put the quote in, reload the whole page to get the data. They changed it to a Flash piece, only that changed.

RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Matthew Walker
So would we! ;-) Just ideas on paper at this stage. I guess that's the problem all around. We have the potential to work in new and interesting ways, but there are few examples, so it's a bit of a leap of faith. Personally, I believe rich clients are the way of the future. It's just a matter of

RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Matt Liotta
We have sell a product (Alchemy EX Studio) as part of our Alchemy EX suite that is completely Flash MX based. Matt Liotta President CEO Montara Software, Inc. http://www.montarasoftware.com/ V: 415-577-8070 F: 415-341-8906 P: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bonnie E. Betts

Re: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Todd
http://www.siteobjects.com is a fantastic example: take a close look at their new logo. :) Isaac Dealey (remembering an old IBM commercial) At least it doesn't have flames shooting out the top of it... Then again, http://www.thrave.com/ looks cool. =P ~Todd Todd Rafferty ([EMAIL

RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Todd
That's my point... Flash developers. I'm talking about the need for Flash / CFMX developers to be _1_ person. It will take time for this to happen, it's not going to happen overnight. I still think it's important to have people that are GREAT in CFMX and then other people that are GREAT in

RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Fitch, Tyler
Well sometimes CF developers have to adapt. They're out their learning CFCs and other new CFMX functionality right now. I trust that if they need too, they'll be smart enough to learn some Flash too. I disagree about your last point. If your whole site is in Flash it loads once. The Flash

RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Wille, Paul
That is just one example. While I am sure you or others can think of other examples like that one -- I certainly can -- the example is just using a Flash piece embedded in an html page. MM has proposed doing away with html entirely for a Flash front-end. In those cases I don't see the

RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Matthew Walker
That's my point... Flash developers. I'm talking about the need for Flash / CFMX developers to be _1_ person. It will take time for this to happen, I don't think this has to happen at all. I can create the CFCs the flash needs, and the Flash developer can take it from there...

RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Matt Liotta
It is always going to be more cost effective to have two specialized people (Flash and ColdFusion developer) than one person who is ok at both. It took me all of an hour to get going with Flash MX and start creating real applications. Is it a wise use of my time? Not in a million years. UI people

Re: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Bonnie E. Betts
Yeah no kidding! I sure can't convince them it's cheaper to hire two different developers! And I sure would hate to think of the old days when programmers designed the GUI :(. At least now, a GUI is created and design templates formed. And then the programmers can build functionality till the

RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Todd
At 12:18 PM 8/2/2002 +1200, you wrote: That's my point... Flash developers. I'm talking about the need for Flash / CFMX developers to be _1_ person. It will take time for this to happen, I don't think this has to happen at all. I can create the CFCs the flash needs, and the Flash

Re: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Jon Hall
The way of the future? I remember seeing my first image on a web page on yahoo ages ago...must have been 94-95. Seven years later we just have a bunch more pictures on the web page, and the most successful web site in existence right now still has just one. I'd love to play with Flash...it's a

RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Matt Liotta
If your whole site is in Flash it loads once. The Flash movie is equal to one or two rich HTML pages in size. Perform more than two functions on your site and you're then passing less data than you would via HTML. That's the simplified version of how it works. I doubt Talkers really cares

RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Matt Liotta
Well correct me if I'm wrong Matt, but if you first preload a flash movie (in this case, the entire UI) and then with each navigation click you simply request the raw data from within the Flash movie, wouldn't it make sense that the bandwidth needs would be less than a non Flash-based site?

RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Wille, Paul
And you are making assumptions as well here. A *GOOD* Flash developer would design the Flash interface to be lightweight, preload once (or as minimal as possible), and minimize the size of his/her Flash movies. No different is the argument that CFML is slow. Those of us that know CFML know

RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Matt Liotta
True, but a well rounded person would know the in's and out's of both... achieving that Guru status has it's merits you know... That is only true for some languages. I have obtained proficiency and mastery in more languages than most and I doubt I will ever be a proficient Flash developer.

cfexecute?

2002-08-01 Thread Tony Weeg
any ideas why this wont run? here is my code. cfexecute name=cx_run.bat arguments=in_123.xml out_123.xml / and here is the error? Cannot execute cx_run.bat Windows NT error 2 occurred. The error occurred while processing an element with a general identifier of (CFEXECUTE), occupying

RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Matt Liotta
That is absolutely not true. A good Flash developer will create a UI that meets the business requirements of the application and allows a user to easily make use of it. That may or may not use more bandwidth than an html based application with the same business requirements. Matt Liotta

Re: SQL_standard?_was_Re:_watching_a_form_for_illegal_SQL_characters

2002-08-01 Thread Jochem van Dieten
S. Isaac Dealey wrote: cfset string=~'; DROP TABLE tablename -- cfquery SELECT * FROM tablename WHERE field = '#string#' /cfquery It will result in the table being dropped, and CF will not filter out the DROP statement, even if you restricted its use (at least in MX). Use cfqueryparam.

RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Todd
Matt Are you telling me you won't be a flash guru anytime soon? :-P Just poking fun... I baited that email pretty well I see. :-) ~Todd At 05:31 PM 8/1/2002 -0700, you wrote: True, but a well rounded person would know the in's and out's of both... achieving that Guru status has it's

Re: RESOLVED: CFX_CyberCash

2002-08-01 Thread Dick Applebaum
Steve Are you going to publish this tag. I have a client I am developing a 2-tier shopping cart. Tier 1 will accumulate the order and will post XML directly to the Manufacturer's ASP site through Tier 2 (when it is in operation). Tier 1 will process the order in a traditional manner if the

Re: cfexecute?

2002-08-01 Thread Howie Hamlin
Error 2 means The system cannot find the file specified. Have you tried the full path to the file? HTH, -- Howie Hamlin - inFusion Project Manager On-Line Data Solutions, Inc. - www.CoolFusion.com - 631-737-4668 x101 inFusion Mail Server (iMS) - The Award-winning, Intelligent Mail Server

RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Tom Nunamaker
Etrade has a stock quote component on their home page. People would put the quote in, reload the whole page to get the data. They changed it to a Flash piece, only that changed. Saved around $400 million for them in bandwidth charges. In the Macromedia seminar I attended last week, Mike

RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Todd
C'mon Tom! $4 million, $400 million, what's the difference. ;-) More money than we'll see in a lifetime. ;-) Just teasing, ~Todd At 07:48 PM 8/1/2002 -0500, you wrote: Etrade has a stock quote component on their home page. People would put the quote in, reload the whole page to get the

RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Fitch, Tyler
I heard 400 from someone. It seemed like a lot. I like 4. Thanks, t ** Tyler M. Fitch Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer ISITE Design, Inc. 615 SW Broadway Ste. 200 Portland, OR 97205 503.221.9860 ext. 111

RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Fitch, Tyler
Fine Matt, I'm right, you're wrong. We'll all deal with it. Imagine a e-commerce site in Flash and in HTML. A user comes in and compares multiple products, over and over again because they can't make up their mind and because they don't care about how much data they take in. In Flash, with

Re: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Fitch, Tyler wrote: Etrade has a stock quote component on their home page. People would put the quote in, reload the whole page to get the data. They changed it to a Flash piece, only that changed. Saved around $400 million for them in bandwidth charges. What did XMLHTTP do again?

RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Paris Lundis
wow 4 million in bandwidth... point well said is that why even use Flash any number of solutions via Javascript or other stuff via DHTML... Flash is nice for things like this though undoubtedly... don't let me try to rain on the Flash party I just get a little peeved myself with the

RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

2002-08-01 Thread Stacy Young
Fitch I'd say your assessment is a reasonable one... Thing is I still consider Flash in it's infancy...It's been an a very big initial push for MX...I think after one or two more iterations we'll begin to see the bigger picture...and by that time it'll be feasible to incorporate into day to day

<    1   2   3   >