ttp://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform?6213=6
I hope this helps!
Vernon Viehe
Community Manager
Macromedia, Inc.
Online diary: http://vvmx.blogspot.com/
> -Original Message-
> From: Joshua Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 8:57 AM
> To: CF
and cvs to name 2 popular ones) that cover this ground nicely
as a core function.
Ok... that's my rant. Back to work .
-mk
-Original Message-
From: John Dowdell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 2:55 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Macromedia Folks: What are you th
To add my own voice I whole heartedly agree.
-Original Message-
From: Mark W. Breneman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 1:04 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Macromedia Folks: What are you thinking?
I hate to be a "Me too" but,
(not bashing, just IMHO
At 04:28 PM 5/6/2002 -0400, you wrote:
> >In ColdFusion studio, I am able to open up a file via FTP / RDS
>
>Yikes! Surely that hasn't been left out of DWMX. That's not a "feature",
>just basic functionality.
Well, it is in there sort of.
You have to create a site to be able to do this. Base
>In ColdFusion studio, I am able to open up a file via FTP / RDS
Yikes! Surely that hasn't been left out of DWMX. That's not a "feature",
just basic functionality.
Ken
__
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by
At 12:55 PM 5/6/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>At 8:56 AM 5/6/2, Joshua Miller wrote:
> > Why should you HAVE to setup a site for everything you want
> > to edit on a remote server?
>
>Am I understanding correctly that you'd like future versions of Dreamweaver
>to download, edit, and upload individual fi
I like the sites feature. I guess if you are using SourceSafe or something
similar, then the site functionality may not be important to you.
Personally, I like the file check-in/check-out features of DWMX, and the
ability to "synchronize" a site without doubling the page count and adding a
lot of
At 8:56 AM 5/6/2, Joshua Miller wrote:
> Why should you HAVE to setup a site for everything you want
> to edit on a remote server?
Am I understanding correctly that you'd like future versions of Dreamweaver
to download, edit, and upload individual files without locally relating
these files to oth
> /me thought that's why they included homesite+ *grinz*
Yeah, it's hilarious alright. The whole Homesite+ thing begs the question:
Why roll all that Homesite/Studio functionality into Dreamweaver if we're
still going to have to switch applications to do basic, day-to-day,
line-to-line tasks? P
ssage-
From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:22 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Macromedia Folks: What are you thinking?
At 10:17 AM 5/6/2002 -0600, you wrote:
>I don't work with RDS or FTP, but I've already determined that I'll be
>stick
media Folks: What are you thinking?
Here.. Here..
| -Original Message-
| From: Joshua Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 9:57 AM
| To: CF-Talk
| Subject: RE: Macromedia Folks: What are you thinking?
|
|
| I certainly hope so ... DWMX has a lot of potential
Here.. Here..
| -Original Message-
| From: Joshua Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 9:57 AM
| To: CF-Talk
| Subject: RE: Macromedia Folks: What are you thinking?
|
|
| I certainly hope so ... DWMX has a lot of potential, but
| removing excellent
age-
JM> From: Shawn Grover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
JM> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 12:43 PM
JM> To: CF-Talk
JM> Subject: RE: Macromedia Folks: What are you thinking?
JM> Haven't played with the Synchronize functionality of DWMX. But I have
JM> used UltraDev. T
m: Shawn Grover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 12:43 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Macromedia Folks: What are you thinking?
Haven't played with the Synchronize functionality of DWMX. But I have
used UltraDev. The synch function in UltraDev makes sure the
folder/file stru
Houser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 10:22 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Macromedia Folks: What are you thinking?
At 10:17 AM 5/6/2002 -0600, you wrote:
>I don't work with RDS or FTP, but I've already determined that I'll be
>sticking with CF Studio
At 10:17 AM 5/6/2002 -0600, you wrote:
>I don't work with RDS or FTP, but I've already determined that I'll be
>sticking with CF Studio 4.5.2 for the web app I'm developing. Simply
>because I don't like the idea of building a SITE in DWMX so I can work with
>my files (yes, I know I can edit my fi
quirks make it difficult to
switch over an existing, partially constructed app.
Shawn Grover
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 9:57 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Macromedia Folks: What are you thinking?
Why did you remove basic use of
hua Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:56 AM
Subject: Macromedia Folks: What are you thinking?
> Why did you remove basic use of FTP/RDS from Studio and replace it with
> the Dreamweaver SITE function?
>
>
Why did you remove basic use of FTP/RDS from Studio and replace it with
the Dreamweaver SITE function?
That was by far one of the BEST features of the Studio product, and the
SITE feature is probably one of the worst features of Dreamweaver. What
about those of us who manage more than 1 site, or
101 - 119 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
