I see some of you have downloaded the HomeSite+/CF Studio wizard for TinyMCE; I
wondering if any of you have used it yet, and your thoughts?
I just posted a HomeSite+/CF Studio wizard for TinyMCE Version 2, though I
think it should work for 1.45 too. You can download the wizard on the
following
I just posted a HomeSite+/CF Studio wizard for TinyMCE Version 2, though I
think it should work for 1.45 too. You can download the wizard on the
following page:
http://www.aftershockweb.net/forums/messages.cfm/ThreadId/65
Please let me know if you like this wizard, also please use the above
Hi all,
just wanted to announce that cf_advancedemail version 2 has gone to beta
and that I could use some help with testing.
What is cf_advancedemail?
cf_advancedemail is a custom tag that lets you send email in both plain
text and HTML, and include images in the email message, so the images
looks good :)
We will test it over this weekend likely...
-paris
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2001 14:44
To: CF-Talk
Subject: cf_advancedemail version 2 beta testing
Hi all,
just wanted to announce
of
email to their servers anyways :)
-paris
-Original Message-
From: Paris Lundis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2001 14:49
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: cf_advancedemail version 2 beta testing
looks good :)
We will test it over this weekend likely...
-paris
PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2001 12:43 PM
Subject: cf_advancedemail version 2 beta testing
Hi all,
just wanted to announce that cf_advancedemail version 2 has gone to beta
and that I could use some help with testing.
What is cf_advancedemail?
cf_advancedemail is a custom tag
to their servers anyways :)
-paris
-Original Message-
From: Paris Lundis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2001 14:49
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: cf_advancedemail version 2 beta testing
looks good :)
We will test it over this weekend likely...
-paris
Paris Lundis wrote:
something else kind of struck me when looking at your tag documentation...
you are writing to the spool directory :) good...
Yes. From there it is picked up by the default CF mail handler (dart.dll).
I was wondering if you or anyone else had looked at the actual MAIL
Jim McAtee wrote:
Jochem,
I just took a quick look at your tag. Nice work. I see that you write
directly to the CF spool directory and that you require the passing of the
SMTP server name to the tag (or else you try to pull this info from the
registry). Looks like this is used only to
Bryant Tyson wrote:
Jochem,
You know what would make this even more useful? If there was a DELAY
value somewhere in there. So when sending huge volume mailings we could
break them down into timed chunks like we were talking about last week.
So say:
VOLUME= 2
DELAY = -1
It sounds very interesting. Does the tag have any mechanism in place to
avoid conflicts with the cfmail tag, such as if they were to both execute
at the same time and attempt to write to the spool folder?
I may have to look into it writing to my own mail server spool directory
rather than the
tom muck wrote:
It sounds very interesting. Does the tag have any mechanism in place to
avoid conflicts with the cfmail tag, such as if they were to both execute
at the same time and attempt to write to the spool folder?
Documentation copy-paste:
Note to ISP's
To my knowledge this tag
Hallo,
Where can i get software version 2 which integrated
with ColdFusion for source control integration?
~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http
What I've found interesting about this discussion, is that I consider
ColdFusion Studio to be a specialized text editor.
Yes it does have wizards and buttons to make things 'easier' for those that
are still in the learning stage, but it inserts CODE. that you then have to
be able to understand
CTED]
Subject: Re: Text Editors vs Site Editors Version 2
What I've found interesting about this discussion, is that I consider
ColdFusion Studio to be a specialized text editor.
Yes it does have wizards and buttons to make things 'easier' for those
that
are still in the learning stage, b
want and who... that's
the damnable misery of it." Tombstone
-Original Message-
From: Mack, Chris R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2000 10:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Text Editors vs Site Editors Version 2
That is not the case. In version 3 it has
that all may benefit from my
lack of wisdom!
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2000 9:16 AM
Subject: RE: Text Editors vs Site Editors Version 2
Yes DreamWrecker is still the best WYSIWYG out there but it destroys
code no matter how
Here's the deal, i'm so used to the keyboard mentality, that i just want to
quick in and out...
I do use other tools, to help with the database stuff like SQL Navigator 3,
Benthic's Golden32
I just like the olde KISS standard of not using tools that do or have more
than I really need.
When
Editors vs Site Editors Version 2
Here's the deal, i'm so used to the keyboard mentality, that i just want to
quick in and out...
I do use other tools, to help with the database stuff like SQL Navigator 3,
Benthic's Golden32
I just like the olde KISS standard of not using tools that do or have
TED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2000 11:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Text Editors vs Site Editors Version 2
Here's the deal, i'm so used to the keyboard mentality, that i just want to
quick in and out...
I do use other tools, to help with the database stuff like SQL Navigator 3,
Benthic'
I like to get my cf coding done FASTER by dragging and dropping cfml code
snips all over the place and then. I actually enter the outside world once
in a while (ya know... sunlight) grab the horse from out in th meadow,
hook ol bessie up to the carriage and take a buggy ride to the farmers
://www.canyon.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PHONE: (520) 773-9059
FAX: (520) 773-4945
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2000 10:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Text Editors vs Site Editors Version 2
I've been using UltraEdit 32 for a few
I didn't mention that I type faster when I listen to music no matter what
kind of music it is.
Byron
-Original Message-
From: Craig M. Rosenblum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2000 11:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Text Editors vs Site Editors Version 2
23 matches
Mail list logo
