Re: Default Route set by BGP Local_Pref [7:40144]

2002-04-02 Thread pankaj kulkarni
You could use a route map along with the neighbour command to set the local preferance.The configuration should be similar to that below. RTD# router bgp 256 neighbor 3.3.3.4 remote-as 300 neighbor 3.3.3.4 route-map setlocalin in ... ip as-path access-list 7 permit ^300$ .. route-map set

multicast+qos [7:40155]

2002-04-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, Can someone let me know the multicast+qos exam prep book for CCIP. Let me know the ISBN No. Kind Regards /Thangavel -- CCIE (qual),CCS,CCDP,CCNP,MCSE 1

Re: JUNIPER TO BUY CISCO!!!!!!!! [7:40056]

2002-04-02 Thread Ben Liang Tan
hey, today is not 1st of April !!! Wake up my friend >From: "B Rudy" >Reply-To: "B Rudy" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: JUNIPER TO BUY CISCO [7:40056] >Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 12:27:28 -0500 > >JUNIPER IS MAKING A BID TO PURCHASE CISCO SYSTEMS THE COMPANY WILL >EVENTUALLY BE CALLE

RE: Question on PIX [7:40146]

2002-04-02 Thread
Avi, Your not doing any type of nat translation for the inside network. If you are not doing any Nat translations then the hosts inside will never be able to get outside. -Original Message- From: Avi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTE

802.3ab [7:40158]

2002-04-02 Thread Lou
I am working on a project and have a question I can't find the answer to, despite 4 hours searching. If you have Cat5E or Cat6 ieee standard cabling, properly tested... Is there a Max amount of cables you can run side by side before experiencing alien Crosstalk.. (Crosstalk between the cables, no

Re: Question on PIX [7:40146]

2002-04-02 Thread Avi
Hi, All the inside addresses are valid internet IP addresses i.e. 216.6.24.189, so i need not do Nating. Thanxs & Rgds, Avi. ""[EMAIL PROTECTED], Jason Contractor (NSANAP N63)"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Avi, > > Your not doing any type of nat translation

RE: Question on PIX [7:40146]

2002-04-02 Thread Mark Odette II
Avi- By definition, the PIX is not a Router. Because of this, the PIX will not know a way to send traffic destined for a network other than what is defined on the PIX Inside or Outside Interfaces. Furthermore, you would have to still do NAT translation from the Outside Interface (192.168.2.x) to

RE: Question on PIX [7:40146]

2002-04-02 Thread
Avi, It doesn't matter that the inside addresses are valid. They still need to be translated outside. You must either enter statics or create an access list specifying that these addresses should not be natted. Also since your inside network is the 172.16.10.x network, and the 216.6.24 network i

please help **location migration** [7:40162]

2002-04-02 Thread Kevin Campbell
I work for a collocation and bandwidth provider and need help with an issue for a migration. We need to move about 30 servers from a offsite location to our data center. The move of the servers needs to be done over the period of a month. We need to do this without changing the ip addresses of t

Re: JUNIPER TO BUY CISCO!!!!!!!! [7:40056]

2002-04-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How about - NICER CPU I JOS RICE CPU JOINS CONJURES PIC I or even SCOPIC INJURE? Dom Stocqueler "Chuck" cc:

Re: IOS Firewall Feature Set -Blocking Attacks [7:40141]

2002-04-02 Thread Steven A. Ridder
If you know it's really him, send him RST-enabled TCP packets. Or use an IDS and that will shun him. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Get in my head: http://sar.dynu.com wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, > > You can configure a simple inbound access-list at your outs

Re: Focus on RFCs [7:40046]

2002-04-02 Thread Steven A. Ridder
I read that somewhere that the group did that. Another BBC article: http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_1321000/1321176.stm -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Get in my head: http://sar.dynu.com ""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > >And sp

RE: Question on PIX [7:40146]

2002-04-02 Thread Lidiya White
You'll never be able to ping outside ip address of the PIX from the inside, but you should be able to ping outside router. I think the rest of the questions were already answered... -- Lidiya White -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Avi Sen

Re: please help **location migration** [7:40162]

2002-04-02 Thread Craig Columbus
See comments inline. Basically, I think you need to explain your restrictions. My experience working with clients is that sometimes perceived restrictions, i.e - "We CAN'T do that!", really aren't restrictions at all, i.e. - "We don't WANT to do that because we really don't understand how it w

Re: PIX VS CheckPoint [7:40136]

2002-04-02 Thread x
I have setup and managed both PIX and Checkpoint in a variety of environments. I think they are both solid options in different situations. Here is how I market these products. PIX - more cost effective - fast - you can have fail over - Can be more complicated to setup the CLI, but PIX has a ni

RE: Question on PIX [7:40146]

2002-04-02 Thread Ole Drews Jensen
Avi, Try to add this: route inside 216.6.24.255 255.255.255.0 172.16.10.1 Hth, Ole ~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~

RE: wireless certification [7:40071]

2002-04-02 Thread Matthew Meiers
What is CWNA? I am unaware of such a title. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of kvgb Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 12:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: wireless certification [7:40071] Ashish, I am interested in CWNA, what study mat

RE: please help **location migration** [7:40162]

2002-04-02 Thread Robert Fowler
I'm not sure if this will help but here goes: I used to work for a dotcom and we had to move our Datacenter from SiteA to SiteB with 2 different address blocks. The problem you might say is if you move the website what happens? Well we made a duplicate copy of the website (minus the database) at

Re: please help **location migration** [7:40162]

2002-04-02 Thread sam sneed
You can do this two ways, either over a VPN or a WAN link over a tunnel interface. The tunnel interface will probably be a little less overhead nsince you don't need encryption. ""Kevin Campbell"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I work for a collocation and bandw

Re: RFC's [7:40135]

2002-04-02 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
First, a general comment on RFC's: when there is an "Applicability Statement", "Framework", or "Roadmap" associated with the protocol specification, read them first. Some of the more complex families such as MPLS, IPSec, etc., also have requirements and architecture documents worth reading.

RE: 802.3ab [7:40158]

2002-04-02 Thread timothy thielen
nothing solid that I know of... I know in the production networks I have SEEN, nobody seems to care how many cables can be bundled. It's never been an issue in the networks I've experienced. Lou wrote: > > I am working on a project and have a question I can't find the > answer > to, despite 4

Re: PIX VS CheckPoint [7:40136]

2002-04-02 Thread Nurudeen Aderinto
Dear x, I love your presentation. You spoke well. Nurudeen ""x"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have setup and managed both PIX and Checkpoint in a > variety of environments. I think they are both solid > options in different situations. Here is how I market

RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]

2002-04-02 Thread Brian Zeitz
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40180&t=40035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SYBEX SIMULATORS [7:39505]

2002-04-02 Thread Wes Knight
In article , [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... > Hi everyone, > > I was wondering if anyone had an opinion on the following > simulation/training programs from Sybex. > > Usefulness, worth the money spent, etc. Am considering purchasing. > > I appreciate your comments, and thanks in advance !! > > C

RE: 802.3ab [7:40158]

2002-04-02 Thread Marko Milivojevic
My wild guess would be that this actually depends on the surrounding, length, position, etc. The good literature for this would be some electrical engineering course on magnetic induction, etc. Advice how to avoid alien crosstalk would be to have those cable as less paralel as possible. Also, twi

Re: Cisco Devices in MS Active Directory [7:40095]

2002-04-02 Thread David Armstrong
And to add to what William has written ... The current package we're looking at to manage our network is Computer Associates Unicenter. At it's core it's nothing more than another SNMP tool; however, it will integrate with about every company's software. With it we can drill through our network t

DTE DCE WAN Simulation [7:40183]

2002-04-02 Thread v s
In setting up at home lab back to back 2501's with dte dce cable Is there anything special you need to do to pass traffic in a simulated WAN environment. Clocking host table Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40183&t=40183 -

which switch [7:40184]

2002-04-02 Thread geek
ok, I have a CAT5505. It uses the "SET" type OS. I have read that there is an IOS like OS for some of the switches. I can only imagine that we need to know both pretty well to score well on any exams. The question: which switch series have the "other" IOS type OS.. I guess I shold look into buy

RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]

2002-04-02 Thread Nguyen, Cuong Q
Galina Pildush is CCIE # 3176 and currently is active. C.Q.Nguyen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Fowler Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 3:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035] I noticed a

7206 disassembly [7:40186]

2002-04-02 Thread Ismail M Saeed
All, I have a problem in 7206 midplane can anyone help me in disassembling the chassis to reach the midplane? please advise Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40186&t=40186 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription inf

Re: Cisco Devices in MS Active Directory [7:40095]

2002-04-02 Thread Jason
Another example of useless comments and waste of bandwidth... just like the one I'm making now.. ""Patrick Ramsey"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Do you really want to trust the management of your core equipment to > anything microsoft puts out? > > >>> "Ma

7206VXR IOS Rec [7:40188]

2002-04-02 Thread Richard Tufaro
Anyone have a good recommendation for an IOS on a 7206VXR with a PA2-T3+? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40188&t=40188 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Repor

RE: RFC's [7:40135]

2002-04-02 Thread Angel Leiva
Here is my favorite download URL for RFCs: http://rfc.sunsite.dk/ Hth, Angel Leiva - MCSE, CCNA, CCNP-WAN Lucent Technologies, ESS  Irving, TX E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of D'Wayne Saunders Sent: Monday, Ap

RE: root switch [7:39975]

2002-04-02 Thread EFIRD, TREECE (CONTRACTOR)
I'm assuming that the use of spantree portfast is coupled with the use of this command: set spantree portfast bpdu-guard enable When this command is applied to the switch, and it will prevent a port configured as a end-station port from being used as an uplink port from another switch. A

RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]

2002-04-02 Thread Robert Fowler
Yes this has been made clear to me by 5 different people including Galina herself. However there was a typo at the bottom of the page listing her with the incorrect CCIE # that is now fixed. -Original Message- From: Nguyen, Cuong Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002

Re: CID Exam Cert Book [7:39669]

2002-04-02 Thread Cebuano
Priscilla, Maybe it's time to switch publishers like Howard's. Unless your upcoming book prevents Cisco from doing what they did to TDND's contract. BTW - when is the next book due for release? Elmer - Original Message - From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" To: Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 2

RE: Cisco Devices in MS Active Directory [7:40095]

2002-04-02 Thread Steve Smith
Beware of Unicenter! -Original Message- From: David Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 8:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco Devices in MS Active Directory [7:40095] And to add to what William has written ... The current package we

RE: Duplicate messages from GroupStudy Listserve [7:40077]

2002-04-02 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
You may find some help from RFC 2321, "The Reliable Internetwork Troubleshooting Agent (RITA)" I've been dying to use that one! Not that I don't take your problem seriously. ;-) Priscilla >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Andy Barkl

Re: Buy Vs. Virtual Rack Time for CCIE [7:40100]

2002-04-02 Thread Ben Lovegrove
Racktime - Pros: Far less expensive than buying; generally reliable equipment; ready made topology; very small footprint(!); available from any remote location; Racktime - Cons: Fixed timeslots mean lack of flexibility in practice; often a waiting list for access; Buying - Pros: Availabe

http access not working anymore?? [7:40149]

2002-04-02 Thread Cisco Nuts
Hello,I use http to get to my routers but after enabling 2 commands on the router it does not work anymoreI removed both the commands with just http access but it still does not workI cleared the cache in IE but that does not help either.I deleted the access-list and also changed the e

RE: #8960 [7:39144]

2002-04-02 Thread Angel Leiva
Congratulations Paul !! Thank you for sharing some tidbits as well. Angel Leiva - MCSE, CCNA, CCNP-WAN Lucent Technologies, ESS  Irving, TX E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Jin Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2

RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]

2002-04-02 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
> >An April fools joke to market your website... So you win either way... > Brian, You seem hostile about this. Could you tell me what subterfuge was involved? From the very beginning, it was identified with Certzone. Whether or not it was marketing -- I agree it is, and personally had nothin

RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]

2002-04-02 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
At 05:26 PM 4/1/02, Robert Fowler wrote: >I wish I got paid for doing work for them. However even if I had the >knowledge to write one of the papers they don't have, I would probably lack >the technical writing skills. However if they want to start paying me I'd >probably be a less obvious in my

RE: 802.3ab [7:40158]

2002-04-02 Thread Chris Charlebois
If alien crosstalk is an issue in any cabling, it would come up in 802.3af before you ever saw it in 802.3ab. 48 volts will cause alot more noise than 5 volts (Is that the voltage for standard 802.3?). I've seen bundles of 20+ cat 5 ethernet running 802.3af without seeing problems. My guess wou

Re: Cisco Devices in MS Active Directory [7:40095]

2002-04-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Another added tidbit: we have been using CA TNG 3.0 and if you want to use Cisco, plan on writing custom agents, which translate to crummy support, (because now you are 'customized' )from CA,and we didn't even do the coding, and well, heck,, I shouldn't get started on them and product scope, reli

RE: CID Exam Cert Book [7:39669]

2002-04-02 Thread William Gragido
Here is my list for the CID: DCN Padjen book Top Down -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 1:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CID Exam Cert Book [7:39669] At 10:03 PM 4/1/02, Rober

RE: CID Exam Cert Book [7:39669]

2002-04-02 Thread William Gragido
I have that book, it is great! Robert does an excellent job outlining the intricacies of the CID. I am taking soon, (probably in May after the CISSP). Thanks for the great book Robert! Regards, Will -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob

RE: IOS Firewall Feature Set -Blocking Attacks [7:40141]

2002-04-02 Thread Roberts, Larry
Or as a simple solution, put a route for his IP address to Null0. His return traffic will never make it. This will not stop a denial of service, But it will stop any return traffic like port scans and such. This machine will effectively Disappear to him... Thanks Larry -Original Message---

FW: DTE DCE WAN Simulation [7:40183]

2002-04-02 Thread george gittins
set the clockrate on the serial interface that has the dce cable attached to 64000 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of v s Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 6:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DTE DCE WAN Simulation [7:40183] In setting up a

RE: access-list problem [7:40092]

2002-04-02 Thread Richard Botham
Shawn, (Unless I misunderstand what you need!!) The following line in your acl - !permit anyone to 172.16.1.0 port 80--web server access-list 101 permit tcp any 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255 eq www Is saying 2 permit any source to get to 172.16.1.0 where the traffic is web traffic. As you would n

RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]

2002-04-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Its in english now http://www.certificationzone.com/studyguides/studyview/?Issue=51&IssueDate=04-02-2002&CP=1 "Brian Zeitz" @groupstudy.com on 04/01/2002 12:00:40 PM Please respond to "Brian Zeitz" Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Ann

Re: JUNIPER TO BUY CISCO!!!!!!!! [7:40056]

2002-04-02 Thread xoai
:) wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > How about - > > NICER CPU I JOS > > RICE CPU JOINS > > CONJURES PIC I > > or even SCOPIC INJURE? > > Dom Stocqueler > > > > > > > > > > "Chuck" > > cc: > Sent by: Subject: Re: JUNIPER TO BUY > C

RE: root switch [7:39975]

2002-04-02 Thread Larry Letterman
that is correct. Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of EFIRD, TREECE (CONTRACTOR) Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 7:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: root switch [7:39975] I'm assuming t

Re: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40207]

2002-04-02 Thread Semion Lisyansky
Hi List, If you would read this study guide to it's end, you could find there nice ~10 lines perl script which explains what the guy actually did - he just shifted ascii of each english letter 128 chars. Have I mentioned that my mother tongue is Russian? -- Semion Lisyansky

Re: 7206VXR IOS Rec [7:40188]

2002-04-02 Thread MADMAN
FWIW I have a couple customers running dual homed Internet connections with 7206VXRs, running 12.2.6 and so far so good. They have PA-A3-T3 and PA-T3. Dave Richard Tufaro wrote: > > Anyone have a good recommendation for an IOS on a 7206VXR with a PA2-T3+? -- David Madland Sr. Network Engine

Re: JUNIPER TO BUY CISCO!!!!!!!! [7:40056]

2002-04-02 Thread B Rudy
Hey smart guy, If you were a true Engineer you would have noticed that the post was dated April 1st. Good jobBen Liang Tan wrote: > > hey, today is not 1st of April !!! > > Wake up my friend > > > >From: "B Rudy" > >Reply-To: "B Rudy" > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: JUNIPER TO

Re: 7206VXR IOS Rec [7:40188]

2002-04-02 Thread Patrick Ramsey
that module has a built in dsu right? >>> MADMAN 04/02/02 12:16PM >>> FWIW I have a couple customers running dual homed Internet connections with 7206VXRs, running 12.2.6 and so far so good. They have PA-A3-T3 and PA-T3. Dave Richard Tufaro wrote: > > Anyone have a good recommendation for

RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40207]

2002-04-02 Thread Tom Ranalli
Interesting. Yesterday, I just copied the HTML and changed the charset to US-ASCII and voila - when I browsed it, I could read it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Semion Lisyansky Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

MPPP for DS-3's [7:40213]

2002-04-02 Thread Woods, Randall, SOLCM
Has anyone ever tried to created a mullilink PPP bundle with DS-3's? A coworker was wondering and I never thought about it myself. I've only configured it for t-1's. I would assume the overhead might be bad for the router instead of using CEF or just letting the routing protocol load balance. Any

RE: please help **location migration** [7:40162]

2002-04-02 Thread Kent Hundley
Kevin, Check out "local area mobility", it looks like it may fit your needs: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/iosw/ioft/lam/tech/lamso_wp.htm HTH, Kent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Campbell Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002

Wierd [7:40215]

2002-04-02 Thread Richard Tufaro
anyone know what the heck this is...my 7206 is having "difficulties" booting: rommon 6 > boot disk0:c7200-js-mz.121-14.bin loadprog: error - on load of image from file system with monlib boot: cannot load "disk0:c7200-js-mz.121-14.bin" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.

OT: Gear for Sale [7:40216]

2002-04-02 Thread Craig Crosby
I am currently selling off some gear, below is what I currently have: PIX-520-UR w/ 4FE: $5200.00 (GREAT FOR CCIE SECURITY STUDIES) MC3810 w/ (2) FXO, (3) FXS, (1) E&M, (1)T1MFT: $1550.00 (PERFECT SOLUTION FOR VOICE TRAINING) FS: PIX-515-UR w/ 4FE: $5500.00 (GREAT FOR CCIE SECURITY PRACTICE)

RE: 7206VXR IOS Rec [7:40188]

2002-04-02 Thread Roberts, Larry
I have a 7204VXR with both a PA-T3+ and what I believe is the PA-3-TA. We run 12.1.1 and have had no issues in over a year. Not exactly what your looking for, but fairly close. I have a 7206VXR with a PA-T3+ and PA-3-TA running 12.1.3a and it has had no issues either, but the PA-T3+ has only been

Re: RFC's [7:40219]

2002-04-02 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
At 11:48 AM 4/2/02, Hugo Taxa wrote: >Sorry to bug you, but I'm looking for something and you being very >knowledgeable in RFCs, are bvound to be a great help. Do you know which >RFC has the definition of SNMPv2 Traps? I'm looking for information about >where the SNMP community travels inside t

Re: CID Exam Cert Book [7:39669]

2002-04-02 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
At 10:07 AM 4/2/02, Cebuano wrote: >Priscilla, >Maybe it's time to switch publishers like Howard's. Unless your upcoming >book prevents Cisco from doing what they did to TDND's contract. >BTW - when is the next book due for release? Hey, you guys keep giving me a chance to get in some free advert

Re: 7206VXR IOS Rec [7:40188]

2002-04-02 Thread MADMAN
Yes Dave Patrick Ramsey wrote: > > that module has a built in dsu right? > > >>> MADMAN 04/02/02 12:16PM >>> > FWIW I have a couple customers running dual homed Internet connections > with 7206VXRs, running 12.2.6 and so far so good. They have PA-A3-T3 > and PA-T3. > > Dave > > Richard

RE: Duplicate messages from GroupStudy Listserve [7:40077]

2002-04-02 Thread Jim Dixon
Yea I have had it as well as several others on this list who were all using Outlook as a mail client. Do this: Delete all your rules. Still having trouble? Remove and Re-install Outlook. That should fix your dupes issue. It fixed mine. My rules were my problem. I deleted them all and re-create

COX Cable and Cisco uBR924 owners [7:40208]

2002-04-02 Thread Cebuano
Hi, all. This is just a short notice for people on this list that are subscribers of Cox Communications and have been denied the use of the Cisco uBR924 or newer models. I have battled the company's politics in the past when i wanted to connect my uBR924 to their network. I even escalated my reque

Re: MPPP for DS-3's [7:40213]

2002-04-02 Thread MADMAN
As I haven ranted in the past, for parallel path load sharing just say no to PPP. CEF works great, is efficient and easy to configure. PPP has more overhead, interleaving, fragmentation (which yes can be disabled and should if you choose PPP) all for what?? You can save IP addresses but this is

Re: Wierd [7:40215]

2002-04-02 Thread MADMAN
do a "dir disk0:" Dave Richard Tufaro wrote: > > anyone know what the heck this is...my 7206 is having "difficulties" booting: > > rommon 6 > boot disk0:c7200-js-mz.121-14.bin > > loadprog: error - on load of image from file system with monlib > boot: cannot load "disk0:c7200-js-mz.121-14.b

Cisco Works 2000 [7:40223]

2002-04-02 Thread Danny
Having issues running Cisco Works 2000 on an 2000 server. It was installed but it seems that nothing is working--can't use any functions. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40223&t=40223 -- FAQ, list archives, and su

MCNS Boson test [7:40224]

2002-04-02 Thread Sanjay Dalal
Does anyone know which test from BOSON is best for MCNS test ? There are three tests available at their site and am wondering which one should i buy ? MCNS #1 MCNS#2 MCNS #3 thanks in advance Sanjay Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40224&t=40224

Re: Cisco Works 2000 [7:40223]

2002-04-02 Thread John Neiberger
It is absolutely necessary to get a support contract for this software. You will probably be making at least two or three calls to TAC to get this working correctly. Save yourself a LOT of trouble by getting software support as soon as possible. If you can successfully get this running without

re: voip em [7:40225]

2002-04-02 Thread Joseph Rago
I have two 2610 routers, one in new york and one in miami These two routers are connected to pbx via e/m cards. When a call is initiated from miami, a ring back tone is heard before the user picks up the phone. However, when the call is initiated from new york, no ring back tone is heard Any s

Re: voip em [7:40225]

2002-04-02 Thread Steven A Ridder
Need more info. -- RFC 1149 Compliant ""Joseph Rago"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have two 2610 routers, one in new york and one in miami > > These two routers are connected to pbx via e/m cards. > When a call is initiated from miami, a ring back tone is

test prep 607 CCNA HELP [7:40228]

2002-04-02 Thread Jimmy
I'm studying for the CCNA test. but should i wait to pick up the Sybex 607 book, or will the 507 book suffice? You guys mention Todd's book. You guys are reffering to the Sybex book right? Also, is the test the same as the 507 but with simulators or did they scrap the entire question list and st

RE: MCNS Boson test [7:40224]

2002-04-02 Thread Ole Drews Jensen
This doesn't answer your question perfectly, but could be a good advise. What I do is to take all the tests, and the one I score the worst in I buy. I also look who wrote the test to see if I recognize a writer from a previous good test. I have not tried the MCNS tests yet, so I cannot give you

Carrier Lost [7:40230]

2002-04-02 Thread PING
If I have a setup: R1 (E3/3)-(E2/3) R2 I want to make R1 think that it has lost the carrier as if I were pulling the cable out at R1 and this message should come up: 1d02h: %AMDP2_FE-5-LOSTCARR: Ehernet3/3 cable/transceiver problem? A line flap by doing shut/no shut at R1

RE: test prep 607 CCNA HELP [7:40228]

2002-04-02 Thread Robert Fowler
For a more detailed answer on this I would recommend reading the article at TCPMAG.com . It has a great article from someone who has taken all 3 the 407, 507 and 607. Basically he says the material is the same just the way it's presented is different although he is careful not to break the NDA.

RE: Cisco Works 2000 [7:40223]

2002-04-02 Thread Roberts, Larry
What version of CiscoWorks 2000 ( RME 3.3 ...) I have CW2K under Windows 2K and have had no issues other than performance ones. ( performance dropped in comparison to NT4 ) When you say it isn't working, can you be more specific ? Does IE bring up a page not found? Does it bring up a login box ?

RE: Cisco Works 2000 [7:40223]

2002-04-02 Thread Larry Perdue
I agree with John. The best advice I know to give you would be to put as much memory in the CW2000 station as possible and when accessing the console from the CW2000 station itself, use the IP address of the station in the URL instead of http://127.0.0.1 or http://localhost. Doing those two thin

RE: MCNS Boson test [7:40224]

2002-04-02 Thread Alex Lei
Hello, I used Bernard Omrani's test (#2, I think). I liked the questions, and Bernard replied promptly when I took issue with one of the questions. Alex Ole Drews Jensen wrote: > > This doesn't answer your question perfectly, but could be a > good advise. > > What I do is to take all the test

Re: Carrier Lost [7:40230]

2002-04-02 Thread Marko Milivojevic
Is it an option to insert a device in between those two routers for testing purpses? If it is, I think it would be relatively simple to make a simple device that will act as an electrical switch, that could break the connection. Connect this with some timer (we're talking relatively simpl

re: voip em [7:40225]

2002-04-02 Thread
Could be echo problems?!? >From: "Joseph Rago" >Reply-To: "Joseph Rago" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: re: voip em [7:40225] >Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 15:01:51 -0500 > >I have two 2610 routers, one in new york and one in miami > >These two routers are connected to pbx via e/m cards. >When a cal

RE: MCNS Boson test [7:40224]

2002-04-02 Thread x
Bernard Omrani is very helpful. I sent him a correction and a question and he answered both. --- Alex Lei wrote: > Hello, > > I used Bernard Omrani's test (#2, I think). I liked > the questions, and > Bernard replied promptly when I took issue with one > of the questions. > > Alex > > Ole D

Frame Relay & OSPF [7:40240]

2002-04-02 Thread brett.eitland
Mocking up a partial mesh frame relay lab running OSPF. Hub router = multipoint subinterface (default OSPF network type = Nonbroadcast) Spoke router = point-to-point subinterface (default OSPF network type = point-to-point) I know that the point-to-point network type setting will cause adjacenci

Split horizon [7:40241]

2002-04-02 Thread x
Do RIP and IGRP disable split horizon in a frame relay hub and spoke topology? I have one source that says both do, one that says only RIP and one that says only IGRP. What is the real answer? __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing wi

BGP Load-Balancing with 2 providers...Possible?? [7:40242]

2002-04-02 Thread Cisco Nuts
Hello, Is it possible to load-balance BGP traffic with 2 service providers...I know it is possible to load balance with 2 circuits to the same provider using ebgp-multihop and update-source and cef but with 2 circuits to 2 different providers?? Thank you for your help.

Re: IPSEC question scenario [7:40025]

2002-04-02 Thread Gaz
CCIE (qual)? Is this a new CCIE track? CCIE Quality Control perhaps? Gaz Professor of Urinary Extraction (qual) wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi Rik, > > You can include a access-list on your router to permit esp,ahp and UDP > port 500 for isakmp > Ur ac

Re: Split horizon [7:40241]

2002-04-02 Thread news.groupstudy.com
Split horizon is disabled by default on a Frame point-to-point interfaces/sub-interfaces. There are a few books with huge errors saying that it is "enabled" on point-to-point interfaces by default. . S0/0 is Frame: Router#sh ip int s0/0 Serial0/0 is down, line protocol is down Internet addres

riverstone [7:40245]

2002-04-02 Thread Kevin Campbell
i was curious if anyone is familiar with riverstone and what your opinions are. [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40245&t=40245 ---

Re: Split horizon [7:40241]

2002-04-02 Thread John Neiberger
You're not showing the subinterface. On a point-to-point subinterface, split horizon is enabled by default: RCORP#sho ip int s1/0.16 Serial1/0.16 is up, line protocol is up Internet address is 10.8.10.70/24 Broadcast address is 255.255.255.255 Address determined by non-volatile memory MT

Re: COX Cable and Cisco uBR924 owners [7:40208]

2002-04-02 Thread Dennis Hess
Nice workaround but isn't that a very expensive bridge you just created? Perhaps selling the UBR and getting something cheaper would be a better solution? ""Cebuano"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, all. > This is just a short notice for people on this list

RE: COX Cable and Cisco uBR924 owners [7:40208]

2002-04-02 Thread Tim Medley
Good Job. Sometimes you have to bend the truth to get around the politics. I've had a similar issue with TimeWarner Road Runner and my ubr924. They won't support it in docsis mode and the basic bridging config doesn't seem to work with their setup. For now I am using a 2611 that I bought for m

RE: test prep 607 CCNA HELP [7:40228]

2002-04-02 Thread timothy thielen
and yes, to those who study Cisco, there is only one "Todd". -T Jimmy wrote: > > I'm studying for the CCNA test. but should i wait to pick up > the Sybex 607 > book, or will the 507 book suffice? > You guys mention Todd's book. You guys are reffering to the > Sybex book > right? > Also, is th

Re: riverstone [7:40245]

2002-04-02 Thread Thomas Gainer
I have used them an find them to be good routers. The configuration is a little difference and some basic tasks like modifying and interface can be unnecessarily difficult, but in terms of functionality, they provided what was promised. I had few problems. Review your requirements before you bu

AS-Path Filtering in Confederations? [7:40249]

2002-04-02 Thread William Lijewski
Can you filter out certain confederations (in the main AS) using AS-Path access-lists? I don't think that it's possible since they are technically in one big main AS. I have also tried it to no avail, but the thing that makes me think it may be able to be done is if I do a show bgp regexp ^$ it

Virtual Lab Software - Opinions? [7:40250]

2002-04-02 Thread Thomas Gainer
Has anyone used it. What do you think? Thomas Gainer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40250&t=40250 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and No

Cisco AS5300 For sale [7:40252]

2002-04-02 Thread Kris Keen
Cisco AS5300, QUAD E1 Card, 2 x 60MICA modems, perfect condition, pulled from working enviroment, 100mbit and 10mbit ethernet ports, comes with rack kit and powercable. 64meg ram and 16meg Flash. Asking $10,000 AUD Can send worldwide at buyers shipping costs Message Posted at: http://www.group

Re: Cisco Devices in MS Active Directory [7:40095]

2002-04-02 Thread Wes Stevens
Chris, Ignore the MS bashers. There is at least a statement of direction that they will work with MS active directory. I don't know how far along it is. The idea is that when a user logs in the switch will setup the vlan on the port from the users active directory profile. For companies with

  1   2   >