RE: PIX 515E Question [7:45206]

2002-05-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Our is the 515E-DMZ so there is one card in there for the FE port. In there other port, there is nothing there. I will look again. "Kris Keen" Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/28/2002 03:38 PM Please respond to "Kris Keen" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:

RE: PIX 515E Question [7:45206]

2002-05-27 Thread Kris Keen
I know this! sorta, cant remember it thought its a card for 3des or similar for PIX to PIX authentication and security? it has no ports right? Nod , seen it. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45208&t=45206 -- FAQ, li

Re: PIX 515E Question [7:45206]

2002-05-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We got a new one in the office. There is an additional card? I didn't see one. Theo "Chee Kin" Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/28/2002 02:42 PM Please respond to "Chee Kin" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:PIX 515E Question [7:45206] Has anyone wor

PIX 515E Question [7:45206]

2002-05-27 Thread Chee Kin
Has anyone worked on the new PIX 515E? What is the use of the additional card that is taking up one of the PCI slot? Thanks. cheekin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45206&t=45206 -- FAQ, list archives, and subsc

Re: What next? [7:45176]

2002-05-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yeah I agree. The market for good MPLS books is wanting a bit much. I want better but can't get it now so I just have to be with the people who are actually doing it and learn from them. Then write my own book :-) Theo "nrf" Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/28/2002 01:13 PM Please respo

Re: What next? [7:45176]

2002-05-27 Thread nrf
Well I should clarify that those 2 books aren't totally horrible, like some of the other Ciscopress books that shall remain unnamed. They're OK. But they're not like Doyle or Halabi. wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Well Then you could get a friend at Foundr

Re: What next? [7:45176]

2002-05-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well Then you could get a friend at Foundry who is implementing MPLS network and just get trained by him. "nrf" Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/28/2002 12:45 PM Please respond to "nrf" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: What next? [7:45176]

Re: Doyle on Lab Rats [7:44611]

2002-05-27 Thread nrf
You didn't think that could pass by without a reply, did you? ""Michael L. Williams"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > "nrf" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Aha. Here is the fundamental difference between you and me. > > > > T

Re: What next? [7:45176]

2002-05-27 Thread nrf
wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Cisco has 2 books on it. > > After that I would just go to Amazon. I really like the two Cisco books > though. Really? I don't think they're very good at all. The Alwayn one in particular is a pretty good paperweight, but that's

Re: Passed BCRAN [7:45182]

2002-05-27 Thread Kris Keen
I passed it in 3 days reading the book. Its easy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45200&t=45182 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclo

Re: BGP addressing..i think i understand but i am not sure [7:45198]

2002-05-27 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 8:04 PM -0400 5/27/02, Nigel Taylor wrote: >Peter, > It would seem that Cable&Wireless and Above along with RIPE are the >main culprits. > >It would seem to me that this inconsistent route issue would present >problems, what I'm I missing? It maybe that I'm not totally >clear on what c

PIX passing IPSEC traffic? [7:45197]

2002-05-27 Thread Edward Sohn
Hello, all... I have a PIX501 set up for PAT on one ip address through my cable modem. I have a client on my internal network that needs to connect to a corporate extranet via IPSEC, using it's own client software (Nortel). In other words, there is no network-to-network or cisco-to-cisco IPSEC c

Re: Doyle on Lab Rats [7:44611]

2002-05-27 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
>What can I say, when the network is stable, there really isn't a whole lot >to do. > > > wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > My how I envy the spare time this posting demonstrates! Well, we could always redirect the thread from lab rats to lab mouses, trackballs

Re: Doyle on Lab Rats [7:44611]

2002-05-27 Thread Michael L. Williams
"nrf" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Aha. Here is the fundamental difference between you and me. > > The fact is, certifications are not really an effective foot-in-the-door, > contrary to popular belief. Yeah yeah, would-be flamers, I just got your > attention,

Re: Doyle on Lab Rats [7:44611]

2002-05-27 Thread cebuano
Well, we're following an SMTP version of the film "Of Mice and Men"... Elmer - Original Message - From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" To: Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 9:44 PM Subject: Re: Doyle on Lab Rats [7:44611] > Don't you guys have a life!? :-) It's Memorial Day for heaven's sake. This

Re: How do I approach the company about my CCIE [7:40261]

2002-05-27 Thread John Neiberger
I've heard that the JNCIE (Juniper) cert is unbelievably difficult. I've also heard it said that both their written and lab exams are considerably more difficult than the CCIE. This may no longer be true once Cisco rolls out the final version of the new written exam, though. It looks like a bea

Re: What next? [7:45176]

2002-05-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco has 2 books on it. After that I would just go to Amazon. I really like the two Cisco books though. "Scott H." Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/28/2002 11:21 AM Please respond to "Scott H." To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: What next? [7:4517

Re: How do I approach the company about my CCIE [7:40261]

2002-05-27 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
>Jenny I assume you are talking about Juniper. I really don't know anything >about their cert. The company I know pretty well. I would not want to be >looking for a job in this market place with only Juniper experience. Juniper >will not go away for sure, but they will be at the tail end of the re

Re: Doyle on Lab Rats [7:44611]

2002-05-27 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
>Don't you guys have a life!? :-) It's Memorial Day for heaven's sake. This >thread has been going on for way too long. > >Priscilla > _I_ spent the day, dealing with sages. Pineapple sage in particular. As I planted them, I was pleasantly surprised to find some that survived the winter.

Re: What next? [7:45176]

2002-05-27 Thread nrf
Nothing much better than the RFC's. Cisco has some textbooks, but in my opinion they really aren't that good. The MPLS/VPN book, for example, is OK if you really really want to do VPN's, but even then it still isn't that informative. They also have a frustratingly Cisco-centric approach to MP

Re: What next? [7:45176]

2002-05-27 Thread Scott H.
Any recommendations for good sources on MPLS? ""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > At 8:58 PM -0400 5/27/02, Scott H. wrote: > >I recently completed the CCIE lab exam (R&S) and have been contemplating the > >next mountain. Anybody have any sugg

Re: Passed BCRAN [7:45182]

2002-05-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I passed it with job experience, 4 routers, Cicso Press, and pressure from my then fiancee to pass it Theo "John McCartney" Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/28/2002 10:26 AM Please respond to "John McCartney" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Passe

Re: What next? [7:45176]

2002-05-27 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 8:58 PM -0400 5/27/02, Scott H. wrote: >I recently completed the CCIE lab exam (R&S) and have been contemplating the >next mountain. Anybody have any suggestions? I have considered both >Juniper and Nortel but my interest level in those is limited and so is my >access to equipment. Anybody g

Re: Doyle on Lab Rats [7:44611]

2002-05-27 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Don't you guys have a life!? :-) It's Memorial Day for heaven's sake. This thread has been going on for way too long. Priscilla At 06:37 PM 5/27/02, nrf wrote: >""Michael L. Williams"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > "nrf" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PRO

Re: Cisco VPN client software [7:45021]

2002-05-27 Thread fahim
I dont think so, Cisco VPN Client can be used only with Cisco devices. fahim ""Santhanam, Thiyagarajan (Cognizant)"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi All, > > Can I use Cisco VPN client software to connect to NetScreen VPN server...? > > Thanks > Thiyagu > This

Re: Windows Radius Authentication for Cisco RAVPN [7:45020]

2002-05-27 Thread fahim
Yes, You can use Win2K IAS Radius for authentication. fahim ""Santhanam, Thiyagarajan (Cognizant)"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi All, > > Can I use Windows Radius server (IAS) for authenticating Cisco remote access > VPN clients terminated in 7140...? > > T

Re: What next? [7:45176]

2002-05-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I agree :-) "nrf" Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/28/2002 10:08 AM Please respond to "nrf" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: What next? [7:45176] My take - do what you enjoy and what your company has available. Surely there are certain parts of

Passed BCRAN [7:45182]

2002-05-27 Thread John McCartney
3 down now just support and I'll join the ranks of a lot of you fellow CCNP's. Any suggestions with Support exam, is it that tough compared to the other three. Thanks in advance. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45182&t=45182 --

Re: What next? [7:45176]

2002-05-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Metro is fun. I don't have the cert but I did that kind of work for about 3 months 2 years ago and it was really challenging and fun. "Scott H." Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/28/2002 09:58 AM Please respond to "Scott H." To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:

Re: Doyle on Lab Rats [7:44611]

2002-05-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I finally started looking at the topic and like the arguements written here. What can I say? I used computers since I was 10 and studied them in Uni and Grad School. I never thought I would get a job doing computers even though I had many years of experience and plenty of course work. (Yeah

Re: Doyle on Lab Rats [7:44611]

2002-05-27 Thread cebuano
Ditto that! That's the reward good engineers get for not falling asleep on the job. After all, who can sleep when you have pagers, cell phone, desktop phone, e-mail, NNM/CWSI alerts, etc. forming a chorus. ;-% - Original Message - From: "nrf" To: Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 8:07 PM Subje

Re: What next? [7:45176]

2002-05-27 Thread nrf
My take - do what you enjoy and what your company has available. Surely there are certain parts of networking that you like and others that you loathe. Try to understand what opportunities your company has available and go for it. Barring that, and in a good economy, jump to another company tha

RE: TCP IP Sequence numbers [7:45131]

2002-05-27 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Priscilla, I read section 3.3 of RFC 793. Everything is clear... Thanks for stressing out those important points of semantic. Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 1:59 PM To: [EMAIL

Re: How do I approach the company about my CCIE [7:40261]

2002-05-27 Thread Wes Stevens
Jenny I assume you are talking about Juniper. I really don't know anything about their cert. The company I know pretty well. I would not want to be looking for a job in this market place with only Juniper experience. Juniper will not go away for sure, but they will be at the tail end of the rec

What next? [7:45176]

2002-05-27 Thread Scott H.
I recently completed the CCIE lab exam (R&S) and have been contemplating the next mountain. Anybody have any suggestions? I have considered both Juniper and Nortel but my interest level in those is limited and so is my access to equipment. Anybody gone down the road of CCIP yet? Metro seems li

Re: Doyle on Lab Rats [7:44611]

2002-05-27 Thread nrf
What can I say, when the network is stable, there really isn't a whole lot to do. wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > My how I envy the spare time this posting demonstrates! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45175&t=44611 --

Re: BGP addressing..i think i understand but i am not sure [7:45174]

2002-05-27 Thread Nigel Taylor
Peter, It would seem that Cable&Wireless and Above along with RIPE are the main culprits. It would seem to me that this inconsistent route issue would present problems, what I'm I missing? It maybe that I'm not totally clear on what constitutes an "inconsistent route". RFC 1930 clearly

Re: Doyle on Lab Rats [7:44611]

2002-05-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My how I envy the spare time this posting demonstrates! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45173&t=44611 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and N

Re: How do I approach the company about my CCIE [7:40261]

2002-05-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"A CCIE is still the highest networking cert and the only one that is not a paper cert. " I'll save nrf the trouble of saying this. Highest networking cert? Arguable. Depends how you define "highest". But it's certainly not a totally unreasonable claim. Only one that is not a paper cert?

Re: Doyle on Lab Rats [7:44611]

2002-05-27 Thread nrf
""Michael L. Williams"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > "nrf" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Well, I don't know if it's a waste of time. Consider this. There might > be > > some newbie guys who were all gung-ho about grabbing

Re: BGP addressing..i think i understand but i am not sure [7:45169]

2002-05-27 Thread Peter van Oene
quick comment in line. At 04:53 PM 5/27/2002 -0400, Chuck wrote: >I have a question, Howard - in line: > > >""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > This is one of those posts where the attributions have gotten very > > confused. Comments inline.

Re: BGP addressing..i think i understand but i am not sure [7:45168]

2002-05-27 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
>I have a question, Howard - in line: > > >""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> This is one of those posts where the attributions have gotten very >> confused. Comments inline. >> >snip for brevity >> >> It can be done, if both ISPs agree to

Security CCIE [7:45167]

2002-05-27 Thread sparkest pig
what is the "must have" books for this certificate? (just like not all Routing and Switching books are "must have") thanks _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.gr

CCIP - who is doing this one? [7:45166]

2002-05-27 Thread Neal Rauhauser 402-301-9555
I'm back to reading groupstudy after an eighteen month abscence. My CCNP/CCDP certs which I finished 12/2000 and 1/2001 are working wonders career wise, but I am doing a lot of carrier type stuff now and I've lined up projects that pretty much cover the BSCI, MCAST+QoS, and MPLS tests for CCIP - n

Re: Doyle on Lab Rats [7:44611]

2002-05-27 Thread Michael L. Williams
"nrf" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Well, I don't know if it's a waste of time. Consider this. There might be > some newbie guys who were all gung-ho about grabbing a bunch of certs > because they believed that by doing so they would just be handed a > super-ki

Re: CCNA level IPX question, proper phrasing [7:45138]

2002-05-27 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
Another thing to think about: What IPX issues might arise if the router only has serial interfaces? At 12:30 PM -0400 5/27/02, Chuck wrote: >Fair? Why would you think it is not "fair? > >Consider that the command you give is straightforward and will indeed enable >IPX routing. Now then, do

Re: Revised: OSPF problem - 2nd try [7:45154]

2002-05-27 Thread Nigel Taylor
Mathias, This is correct! When you configure the "demand-circuit" after the ISDN circuit goes down you should see "DNA" noted in the ospf database which suppresses the need for hello's to be sent. Since both R1, R2, and R4 are a part of area1, when the frame circuit between R2-R4 g

Re: BGP addressing..i think i understand but i am not sure [7:45163]

2002-05-27 Thread Chuck
I have a question, Howard - in line: ""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > This is one of those posts where the attributions have gotten very > confused. Comments inline. > snip for brevity > > It can be done, if both ISPs agree to it and coordi

Re: IOS Install Problems [7:45102]

2002-05-27 Thread Justin M. Clark
Thanks to all, its working now. The problem was that I was't erasing the flash first. I was figuring that it would erase as it goes, When i told it to grab the bin file it was giving me one ! and then saying ok, I didn't know that it was just checking for existance of the file, I went ahead and

Re: Diffrences between buildin and NM 10/100 Ether [7:45089]

2002-05-27 Thread John Dorffler
Grrr. I searched through the release notes here http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_mod/1700/1751/175 1rlsn/index.htm and could not find anything on trunking. Okay, new moral here: do multiple searches with different keywords. Sorry, John ""M.C. van den Bovenkamp"" wrot

Re: Doyle on Lab Rats [7:44611]

2002-05-27 Thread nrf
Well, I don't know if it's a waste of time. Consider this. There might be some newbie guys who were all gung-ho about grabbing a bunch of certs because they believed that by doing so they would just be handed a super-kick-ass job (no doubt some training school told them so). Now perhaps after r

Re: Diffrences between buildin and NM 10/100 Ether [7:45089]

2002-05-27 Thread M.C. van den Bovenkamp
John Dorffler wrote: > I must disagree. I have a study friend that bought a 1751 recently, brand > new, and discovered that it does not support trunking. We looked at the > release notes for the latest versions of IOS for the 1751 and could not find > any reference to trunking. You didn't look v

Re: Native Vlan [7:45146]

2002-05-27 Thread Ron Trunk
Packets sent on the native VLAN do not have the VLAN tag in them, so they can be read by non-vlan aware devices. Ron ""Chan Stephen"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all > > Can someone tell me what is the purpose of the native vlan in Csico Switch? > What is

Re: Provider Backbone Engineering and CCIEs [7:44876]

2002-05-27 Thread Ron Trunk
""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > At 3:33 PM -0400 5/23/02, Ron Trunk wrote: > >Howard and dre, > >First of all, thanks for the excellent thread! > > First, thanks for letting me know you are still around! > I've started teaching 'unofficial'

RE: Native Vlan [7:45146]

2002-05-27 Thread richard dumoulin
The only thing I know from the switching exam, is that it is the vlan number the trunk uses in case the trunk feature fails. Regards. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45156&t=45146 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscr

Re: Diffrences between buildin and NM 10/100 Ether [7:45089]

2002-05-27 Thread John Dorffler
I must disagree. I have a study friend that bought a 1751 recently, brand new, and discovered that it does not support trunking. We looked at the release notes for the latest versions of IOS for the 1751 and could not find any reference to trunking. We believe that the 1751 was never meant to do t

Re: Provider Backbone Engineering and CCIEs [7:44876]

2002-05-27 Thread Ron Trunk
""dre"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... ... > Exactly the reason why the CCIE: Design didn't pan out, and why the > CND/CID course material is a wee bit out-of-date. Real world experience > is impossible to test on any type of standardized exam. There is no > "sho

Re: Diffrences between buildin and NM 10/100 Ethernet modules [7:45152]

2002-05-27 Thread John Dorffler
The FE interfaces that support VLAN trunking all use a chipset that supports trunking. Not all router models and not all modules that have 100Mbps interfaces use the required chipset. The best way to determine whether a router or module supports trunking is to read the release notes for the hardwa

AW: Revised: OSPF problem - 2nd try [7:45150]

2002-05-27 Thread Spoerr, Mathias
Nigel, I forgot to tell you that the second task is that the ISDN must not be up until the FR R4-R2 fails. R3 has to initiate the call and R1 must call back. There is another exercise regarding to this layout, where a backup link must exist for the area 2 connection. -10.x.x.x/24---

Re: TCP IP Sequence numbers [7:45131]

2002-05-27 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
At 07:37 AM 5/27/02, Pierre-Alex Guanel wrote: >I understand that when a host is sending an acknowledgement, it indicates to >the target the NEXT segment number that it expects to receive. It's kind of a picky thing, but it's not accurate to say that the ACK indicates the number of the next segm

Re: BGP addressing..i think i understand but i am not sure [7:45149]

2002-05-27 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
This is one of those posts where the attributions have gotten very confused. Comments inline. Again, a fundamental question is "what problem are you trying to solve" with the load balancing. If you are getting full routes from multiple well-connected providers, that, in and of itself, should

Re: written [7:45056]

2002-05-27 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Well, consider this too: Cisco has either monkeys or complete idiots classifying the questions. Or maybe it's very poorly-written software that does it. I'm not sure. But the bottom line: If you get a low percentage in a particular topic area, it doesn't mean that you don't know that topic. Ci

Re: Diffrences between buildin and NM 10/100 Ether [7:45089]

2002-05-27 Thread Alexander Kharkats
Any fast Ethernet interface on Cisco router supports VLAN trunking. You may need to use IP Plus IOS for that. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45147&t=45089 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.gr

Native Vlan [7:45146]

2002-05-27 Thread Chan Stephen
Hi all Can someone tell me what is the purpose of the native vlan in Csico Switch? What is the feature & main usage on that? I am wondering if it is a proprietary feature, it will only work through Cisco Switches only? Thanks. Cheers Stephen Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/

Re: Provider Backbone Engineering and CCIEs [7:44876]

2002-05-27 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
>Howard, > >When is your book "Building SP Networks" going to be coming out? I think >that this book can really help me out. I have noticed in my quest to build >the best SP that I can, that there's not really any one resource to address >all of the issues. Being new to the SP space, I am looki

Mail Relay [7:45144]

2002-05-27 Thread richard dumoulin
Can anyone tell me what is a mail relay for ?? I know it is not a Cisco issue, but for me it is related to the fact that I am only studying cisco stuff and therefore do not know anything about those kind of Microsoft things. Regards. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f

Re: CCNA level IPX question, proper phrasing [7:45138]

2002-05-27 Thread Chuck
Fair? Why would you think it is not "fair? Consider that the command you give is straightforward and will indeed enable IPX routing. Now then, do you know what happens as a result of that command? Have you thought of this in terms of how an IPX network is numbered, and what an important and signi

RE: IOS Upgrades [7:45128]

2002-05-27 Thread Angel Leiva
Rock, I'd suggest that you follow CCO's IOS Upgrade procedures for the routers with RO Flash you may have. The fact that those routers have Read-Only Flash type, doesn't mean that you can't erase and upload a new IOS image. Read-Only FLASH memory requires a different method of "erasing" its cont

Re: Provider Backbone Engineering and CCIEs [7:44876]

2002-05-27 Thread travis marlow
Howard, When is your book "Building SP Networks" going to be coming out? I think that this book can really help me out. I have noticed in my quest to build the best SP that I can, that there's not really any one resource to address all of the issues. Being new to the SP space, I am looking for

Re: OSPF problem - 2nd try [7:45124]

2002-05-27 Thread Chuck
""Spoerr, Mathias"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello! > > I think I found the Solution for the wrxkrmpf OSPF problem. > I configured tunnel interfaces at R1, R2 and R4 and bound the interfaces to > OSPF area 2. I configured no virtual link. Now only R1 and R2

AW: OSPF problem - 2nd try [7:45124]

2002-05-27 Thread Spoerr, Mathias
Hello! I think I found the Solution for the wrxkrmpf OSPF problem. I configured tunnel interfaces at R1, R2 and R4 and bound the interfaces to OSPF area 2. I configured no virtual link. Now only R1 and R2 are in Area 0. Another advantage is the backup for Area 2. In the original setup I had the

Re: How do I approach the company about my CCIE [7:40261]

2002-05-27 Thread Wes Stevens
If you look at Cisco over the last 18 months compared to it's competitors it has done well. It's sales have dropped much less then most other networking companies and they have actually gained market share in all major areas. The major telco's built out way too fast and the growth did not come

CCNA level IPX question, proper phrasing [7:45138]

2002-05-27 Thread Mike Sweeney
I have a IPX question in my CCNA practice test beta and I've had some mixed feedback on it. The questions asks what is the command to enable IPX routing on a router and gives a MAC address as part of the question. The question is a *fill in the blank* type. The answer I have is: ipx routing Is

Revised: OSPF problem - 2nd try [7:45129]

2002-05-27 Thread Nigel Taylor
Mathias, I think your you're trying to hard and possibly reading too much into the requirements. I personally agreed with Jan's #1 option in which the "area x range not-advertise" command is used on R1, R2, and R4. Although your most recent solution may work try to think of a solution

TAACS+ [7:45136]

2002-05-27 Thread GEORGE
Is there a way to allow only a certain group defined in your taacas config to access a router or a Cisco device. I'm asking this because im using taacas for my dialup users and would like to create another group like techs to have rights to access a Cisco device Message Posted at: http://www.g

Re: How do I approach the company about my CCIE [7:40261]

2002-05-27 Thread Peter van Oene
One comment inline: nrf said: >So while yes, I agree that Cisco and the CCIE will probably get better, if >you think we're going to have 1999 all over again, you're just deluding >yourself. The world has changed, and people will simply have to admit that >when it comes to the value of tech sk

ISDN Config on Cisco 7200 [7:45133]

2002-05-27 Thread Igor Bloch
Hello, I am trying to configure a Cisco 7200 for direct ISDN connexion. Could you please give me some advice or web links to get some lessons on it ? Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45133&t=45133 -- FAQ, l

RE: Check My EIGRP Configuration [7:45065]

2002-05-27 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Best of luck to you! Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 2:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Check My EIGRP Configuration [7:45065] Dear Kris, Karago, Pierre-Alex, Chuck, Steven, Brian and everybody thanks

TCP IP Sequence numbers [7:45131]

2002-05-27 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
I understand that when a host is sending an acknowledgement, it indicates to the target the NEXT segment number that it expects to receive. When host A sends acknowledgement number X to host B, why does B sets its sequence number to X+1? I would expect B to set its sequence number to X, since X i

RE: IOS Upgrades [7:45128]

2002-05-27 Thread Marko Milivojevic
> We are having difficulties with one of our router that has > it's flash in > Read-Only. Which make it impossible to upgrade I think. Do > you have an idea > on how to upgrade an IOS on a router with a Read-Only flash. Boot router from ROM and take it from there. Marko. Message P

IOS Upgrades [7:45128]

2002-05-27 Thread BASSOLE Rock
Hello group, After the announce on SNMP and NTP vulnerabilites we are doing upgrades on our routers with Cisco's recommandations. We are having difficulties with one of our router that has it's flash in Read-Only. Which make it impossible to upgrade I think. Do you have an idea on how to upgra

BGP addressing..i think i iunderstadn but i am not sure [7:45127]

2002-05-27 Thread stephen skinner1
Chaps.. can i try to explain something about BGP addressing and you chaps point out were i am or am not going wrong ??.. EG.. i have two bgp routers going to the net ... i am multihomed to 2 service providers...(and accepting FULL routes) i have been issued 2 "sets" of ip address to my servic

RE: CCDP, What book? [7:45109]

2002-05-27 Thread Kris Keen
Thanks Theo , ill see how I go with this :) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45126&t=45109 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure v

RE: CCIE Written Question [7:44578]

2002-05-27 Thread HARMANDER SINGH
Pls. see below : 0200.1078.0400 Write in binary : 0200 10780400 0010 0001 0111 1000 0100 After that exchange as under 0010 0001 1000 0111 0100 And then 0100

RE: Check My EIGRP Configuration [7:45065]

2002-05-27 Thread Ismail Al-Shelh
Dear Kris, Karago, Pierre-Alex, Chuck, Steven, Brian and everybody thanks for helping me, I appreciate all your points. The conclusion I got it is to leave EIGRP if I have no redundant link and go for Static routes therefore I will save more bandwidth and not to be devil anymore. To be honest I

Help:: Any procedure automated dialup in 3640 ?? [7:45122]

2002-05-27 Thread Kiran Kumar M
Hai, I am using 3640 with NM 16 AM module. I would like to implement a application with the following functionality. One computer dialin to cisco, and it will connect, and then from this I want to dialout to another NAS automatically. eg. Node A dials to Async 97 (of cisco), and then Async 1

Re: How do I approach the company about my CCIE [7:40261]

2002-05-27 Thread nrf
""Gaz"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I think that depends on the individual company. > Our company currently has 6 CCIE's. I was dissuaded from going for CCIE by > my company. The reason, although they haven't stated it in so many words is > that they would just