Re: NANOG 25 Meeting [7:46007]

2002-06-07 Thread Nigel Taylor
Howard, I see that Sue Hares will be doing the moderation for the Panel: Smart Routing Technologies, but she's not listed as giving any of the BOF's. Based on your statement I was thinking Sue would be doing a BOF or presentation on the BGP convergence drafts, which you

Boson PIX Test [7:45963]

2002-06-07 Thread Ben Woltz
Can anyone recommend one of the Boson PIX tests that is good? I am now scared to get Boson test because I got one for the IDSPM test and it was horrible. Didn't prepare me at all for the exam. Seems like they are not consistent. Message Posted at:

RE: OSPF area 0 [7:45995]

2002-06-07 Thread Nelson Herron
You should be able to anneal the Area 0. See Doyle, Vol. 1, pg 553. The implication is that the original design of Area 0 should be robust so that a link failure will not force a partition. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46001t=45995

CCIE Security Written [7:45987]

2002-06-07 Thread Shahid Muhammad Shafi
Hi All, I am attempting the written part of Security on June 24th. I passed my 3 Security exams and will be attempting IDS before written. Can anybody guide what else needed to be prepared and plus how relevant are Boson and Vconsole to the Real exam? Thanks, Shahid Shahid Muhammad Shafi

FEC with routeurs [7:46008]

2002-06-07 Thread Dion, Thierry
hello guy, =20 Do U heard about FEC on Routers, if yes with what IOS version we can do = and our ? =20 Thanks Kind Regards. Thierry. _ =20 =20 [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of getro.gif] [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/gif

Re: NANOG 25 Meeting [7:46005]

2002-06-07 Thread Nigel Taylor
Peter, Great! I'm thinking Juniper and the BearGear booth in such close proximity, may explain the cascading style format of the JunOS versus Cisco's left justified (non-hierarchal) based configuration. :- I'm sure Howard/Priscilla with their experience in software(system) development

OSPF area 0 [7:45995]

2002-06-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, OSPF area 0 must be contiguous. Have a look at RFC 2328, section 3.7 (Partitions of areas). Part of that section says... Also, the backbone itself must not partition. If it does, parts of the Autonomous System will become unreachable. Backbone partitions can be repaired by configuring

CCIE written and configuration Issues [7:45976]

2002-06-07 Thread Hamid
Hi, I am studying for the written exam. I was wondering wether configuration issues would be asked at the exam?(commands , etc.) Thanks in advance Hamid Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45976t=45976 -- FAQ, list

RE: Searching for CCIE Lab scenarios [7:45754]

2002-06-07 Thread Sujal G. Ajmera
There's a good book by Todd Lammle - CCIE Expert Study Guide for Exam 350-001. Sujal -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jitendra Joshi Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 6:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Searching for CCIE Lab scenarios

OSPF through a firewall [7:45953]

2002-06-07 Thread Elijah Savage
This is a little off base but, I am trying to run ospf on a vpn concentrator through a checkpoint firewall has anyone ever gotten this to work? I know with a PIX according to Cisco documentation and TAC you can't run OSPF through it because of it's multicast. But the Checkpoint has a object

Re: VPN Overhead [7:45719]

2002-06-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ha Ha Ha, You are a good guy. :-) Theo Elijah Savage 06/06/2002 07:45 PM Please respond to esavage To: cc: Subject:Re: VPN Overhead [7:45719] Theo, The reason I sent it to everyone on the list was for the specific reason of the individual

Must Read Not all exams have the Sims [7:45992]

2002-06-07 Thread Elijah Savage
This is a email I got from Cisco today about the new exams, I thought they all would have the sims but that is not true according to this email. Real-World Networking Expertise with Real-World Simulations Cisco Systems certified professionals are recognized for their networking prowess. Today,

PIX Static and Conduit [7:46002]

2002-06-07 Thread Karagozian Sarkis
I am preparing for MCNS - Manual Ver 2.1 Page 6-22and not clear about Static and Conduit commands with fixup protocol smtp 25. I Don't understand the static (inside,outside) global-ip local-ip ... when I compare it with the below stated static command: static (dmz2,dmz1) 172.16.1.10 10.1.1.1

RE: Networkers San Diego [7:45885]

2002-06-07 Thread Oleg Oz
I will be in the Multicast Power session on Monday and the Router Architecture Power session in Friday. Arriving Saturday Night. So if you are in either class just yell out my name :) Oleg. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46003t=45885

PIX Static and Conduit [7:46000]

2002-06-07 Thread Karagozian Sarkis
I am preparing for MCNS - Manual Ver 2.1 Page 6-22and not clear about Static and Conduit commands with fixup protocol smtp 25. I Don't understand the static (inside,outside) global-ip local-ip ... when I compare it with the below static command: static (dmz2,dmz1) 172.16.1.10 10.1.1.1 netmask

RE: CCIE Lab Question Mark [7:45980]

2002-06-07 Thread Moffett, Ryan
That's absolutely not true. In order to do something like that, they would have to custom compile IOS code specific to the CCIE Lab to have that removed. Believe me, the ? is an integral part of working with Cisco devices from the command line. -Original Message- From: Robert McBride

RE: It's Official - CCNP 6xx series [7:45867]

2002-06-07 Thread Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1
The CCNP exams are a joke they are that easy, and if havent changed for 6xx then I'm really disappointed in Cisco. I guess you know a lot more than the industry that recognized these certs. I must assume that you have your CCIE since the NP was so easy for you. Instead of all crying, just go

RE: Silly Boson question [7:45625]

2002-06-07 Thread John Swartz
I am Nuclear Physicist by training. I specialized in gamma-ray spectroscopy. When I started Boson, the only sub-atomic particle whose domain name was available was Boson.com. John Swartz, ccie, mcse, cne Boson Software Message Posted at:

RE: CCIP vs CCNP vs CCIE - not very close at all [7:45893]

2002-06-07 Thread Jose A Rola
Hello Everybody, In my understanding you are comparing aplle and oranges. I think that the concept os cisco is: If you want to certify in the enterprise networks world (Token ring, IP, IPX, apletalk, ...) you should follow the path CCNA (mandatoy)-CCNP-CCIE(Routing Switching) If you want to

Interface Uptime [7:46014]

2002-06-07 Thread Stefan Leemann
Is there a possibility to get out an interface uptime from a cisco router via SNMP? I would like to get a quick overview over Link uptimes with MRTG/RRD. Thanks, Stefan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46014t=46014

Re: VoIP over VPN [7:45819]

2002-06-07 Thread Orest Umudumov
Hi all, Thanks for your time and the excellent comments you made. Orest Orest Umudumov schrieb: Hi group, have anybody experience with VoIP over VPN??? Any suggestions would be appreciated thanks in advance Orest [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a

Re: OSPF area 0 [7:45995]

2002-06-07 Thread Peter van Oene
If you are looking for documents, you might start with RFC 2328. Contiguous in this context refers to connectivity that continues without a break. In that sense, within an OSPF domain, it is necessary to maintain contiguous connectivity in the backbone. When contiguity is broken, the area

simulation questions were added to Cisco professional level [7:46017]

2002-06-07 Thread Jeffrey Reed
Received this morning from my Cisco channel manager On June 5, 2002, simulation questions were added to Cisco professional level certification exams and corresponding courses. The new exams with simulations for CCNP, CCDP, and CCIP certifications include: -BSCI 640-901 -Routing 640-603 -Remote

RE: CCIE-lab scenarios [7:34870]

2002-06-07 Thread Ronald Dommelen
Hi Clark, I was wondering if you already figured out which lab scenarios are the best ? Did you also got access to some cisco labs ? I have the same problem like you.Am currently preparing for the lab test and have several books but no lab scenario's Cheers Ronald van Dommelen The Netherlands

VoIP [7:45991]

2002-06-07 Thread Steve Watson
1 - What routers support VoIP? (Looking for a Cisco Link, can't find one) I have a lot of old 2501's and have been told they don't support VoIP but have found nothing in writing. 2 - Has anyone used the ATA 186? Steve Message Posted at:

Re: FEC with routeurs [7:46008]

2002-06-07 Thread Erick B.
This is supported on the 7500/7000 series routers starting with 11.1 CA. Under the fast ethernet interface, do a 'channel-group #' which ties the fast Ethernet interface to a port-channel interface. Example: interface fast Ethernet 1/0/0 no ip address channel-group 1 interface fast

Passed MCNS today [7:45970]

2002-06-07 Thread Shoaib Waqar
Hi guys, I just passed MCNS today with 906 marks. Thanks for everybody who helped or tried to help me. chao Shoaib __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com Message Posted at:

SNMP Design [7:46024]

2002-06-07 Thread Lupi, Guy
I wanted to find out what the consensus is on SNMP. If you have a 7513 with around 400 interfaces, what is the best method of determining interface state? I would think that traps or informs would be the best method, so that the router is not burdened with a poll every 3 to 5 minutes on every

RE: Networkers San Diego [7:45885]

2002-06-07 Thread Logan, Harold
So in order to identify you, we just need to wait for someone at the power session to ask if the network in the lab is RFC 1149 compliant? -Original Message- From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 9:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:

RE: PIX Static and Conduit [7:46000]

2002-06-07 Thread Daniel Cotts
The value of an interface is determined by its security number. The higher the number the more protected it is. nameif ethernet0 outside security0 nameif ethernet1 inside security100 nameif ethernet2 dmz security50 So inside is most secure. dmz less secure than inside but more secure then

Recent CCIE power session [7:46026]

2002-06-07 Thread kevhed
I attended Networkers in 2001 in Chicago and attended the CCIE Power Session, this was prior to the lab going to the one-day format. Does anyone have a link where I could download the latest CCIE Power Session powerpoint presentation that applies to the one-day format? Does Cisco make those

RE: PIX Static and Conduit [7:46000]

2002-06-07 Thread Karagozian Sarkis
Hi Daniel, Thanks for clarifying that Static is (High,low) low high the only thing is that, dmz2 is shown to be on the outside (1st tier netwk), dmz2 (2nd tier netwk) or private network, where 10.1.1.0 network is. If this is the case then, should it be written as: static (dmz1,dmaz2)

Re: Anniversary [7:45937]

2002-06-07 Thread Johnny Routin
Interesting... one year ago they gave out #7544. Last week they gave out 94xx. So almost 2,000 new CCIE's in 12 months! JR Kenneth R. Snell wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Exactly one year as a made man. Time to start studying for the recert. So, I'm back!

Re: Cloning a PIX from a PC (FrankenPIX) [7:45833]

2002-06-07 Thread sam sneed
For that price I'd go with the PIX 501. Kris Keen wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I've got a Franken pix, compelte with 16meg card, PII 450, 128meg Ram, dual Intel nics and it works fine. I have a few PIX 16meg Cards available at $550USD. I'm located in

Re: VoIP [7:45991]

2002-06-07 Thread Steven A. Ridder
1700, 2600,3600,3700,7xxx Steve Watson wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... 1 - What routers support VoIP? (Looking for a Cisco Link, can't find one) I have a lot of old 2501's and have been told they don't support VoIP but have found nothing in

RE: Cisco 3660 Router and NAT [7:45968]

2002-06-07 Thread Andrew Larkins
I have a few more users than this and things are perfect. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 June 2002 20:01 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco 3660 Router and NAT [7:45968] Has anyone has any problems with a 3660 router and approximately

Re: PIX 506 port translation with DHCP [7:45945]

2002-06-07 Thread Parmjit
Hi I got it working from an email this guy sent to me: This maps an inside server (172.16.1.10) to an outside address (64.1.109.5). access-list 100 permit tcp any host 64.1.109.5 eq ftp static (inside,outside) 64.1.109.5 172.16.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 access-group 100 in interface

Re: Networkers San Diego [7:45885]

2002-06-07 Thread Steven A. Ridder
Si. Logan, Harold wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... So in order to identify you, we just need to wait for someone at the power session to ask if the network in the lab is RFC 1149 compliant? -Original Message- From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL

old IPv6 beta image grovel [7:46009]

2002-06-07 Thread Neal Rauhauser 402-301-9555
Does anyone have any of the old IPv6 beta images for 16xx series? These would be the ones that provided BGP on access routers :-) I have a ton of 1605s hanging around so I am whipping up a little lab. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46009t=46009

PIX 506 port translation with DHCP [7:45974]

2002-06-07 Thread Parmjit
hi I have a pix 506 connected to cable and would like my ftp server available on the net and wondered how to configure the 506 to do so. I have tried static (inside,outside) interface 192.168.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 and conduit permit tcp host 192.168.0.2 eq ftp any but it doesn't work.

Question about the 350 series AP [7:45971]

2002-06-07 Thread Roberts, Larry
OK, Can someone confirm/deny that the 350 will only accept in-line power? Does it come with the in-line power injector, or is this a separate item? I have read everything I can and all points say it only has in-line power, but none say whether this is included ( I can't image it wouldn't be )

OT: Cisco SCA11000 Secure Content Accelerator [7:45989]

2002-06-07 Thread Tim O'Brien
I have a question on the SCA11000 that I was hoping someone could help with. I installed one of these and in working with the config I enabled the web management interface. Everything appears to be functional however I can only web into it for management from the same network as the server port.

Cisco Simulator [7:46034]

2002-06-07 Thread John Harper
Hello All, I was talking to a Cisco CCIE this morning and he mentioned that an open source cisco router simulator was somewhere on the internet for free download. He believed it was called IUO or IOU or something similar... supposedly it was developed to roiginally run on solaris boxes. Anyone

RE: VoIP [7:45991]

2002-06-07 Thread Mark Odette II
Cisco UBR900 series Cablemodem, and the Cisco 1750/1760 series Routers are the low-end VoIP supported routers. The 2600 series routers with NM-1V/2V cards are low/mid-range VoIP routers for the Enterprise (acting as Gateways from PSTN or P(A)BXs). Your next step up is the 3600's, then the

RE: Anniversary [7:45937]

2002-06-07 Thread Mark Odette II
Does anybody know if the numbers are issued sequentially, or if they issue them pseudo-randomly, i.e., 7923, 7929, 7938, 7963, etc. Of course, this just came to mind Imagine the wonderful soul that got 6969! :) Sorry, it's Friday, and my male humor is seeping a little. No offense

ip nat overloading question [7:46037]

2002-06-07 Thread Telemachus Luu
Hi, I have a question regarding dynamic natting using ip nat overloading. I have the following configuration. ip nat pool test 66.66.66.32 66.66.66.63 netmask 255.255.255.224 ip nat inside source list 1 pool test overload access-list 1 permit 10.0.0.0 0.0.255.255 From internal, I can ping the

RE: Cisco 3660 Router and NAT [7:45968]

2002-06-07 Thread Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1
Which IOS version are you running? How much memory? Bill Creighton Senior System Engineer iDEN CNRC Packet Data -Original Message- From: @az33exr01.mot.com [mailto:@az33exr01.mot.com] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 1:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco 3660 Router and NAT

CSPFA Advice [7:45985]

2002-06-07 Thread Shoaib Waqar
Hi guys Can anybody tell me that which book to use to prepare for CSPFA exam of CSS?? I have done with MCNS and for CSPFA, i saw this book in cisco press storeL Cisco Secure PIX Firewalls by David Chapman / Cisco Press / So kindly advice me whether its the right book to go for CSPFA? Any sort

Re: Networkers San Diego [7:45885]

2002-06-07 Thread Robert Padjen
Yup. Yup. Flying myself down from SF Sunday and back Friday night if anyone is interested. (Small, single engine plane) --- Oleg Oz wrote: I think I saw a thread on this a few weeks ago but can no longer find it.. Is anyone going to networkers in San Diego.. Taking power sessions?

CCNP!! [7:46038]

2002-06-07 Thread Chris Dumais
I completed my 7 month journey today to become a CCNP with the completion of my CIT Exam. I got a lot of valuable information from this message board. Thanks for all of your input, it was very appreciated! Chris Dumais, CCNP,CNA Message Posted at:

RE: PIX 506 port translation with DHCP [7:45974]

2002-06-07 Thread brian charles
What version are you running? With 6.0 and higher you can use the static command to do port redirection. static Maps a local IP address to a global IP address (NAT) and supports TCP and UDP port redirection (static PAT). (Configuration mode.) [no] static [(internal_if_name, external_if_name)]

Re: Question about the 350 series AP [7:45971]

2002-06-07 Thread Henry D.
Mine included everything. Roberts, Larry wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... OK, Can someone confirm/deny that the 350 will only accept in-line power? Does it come with the in-line power injector, or is this a separate item? I have read everything I can and all

RE: Networkers San Diego [7:45885]

2002-06-07 Thread Tim Medley
I'll be at Networkers San Diego. I'm taking the Voice Power Session on Monday. I'll be arriving in San Diego on Saturday before Networkers, anyone up for a round of golf on Sunday? I'm thinking Torrey Pines. Tm Tim Medley - CCNP+Voice, CCDP Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld We've

RE: PIX Static and Conduit [7:46000]

2002-06-07 Thread Daniel Cotts
If dmz1 has a higher security value then dmz2 then your static line is correct. ... but doesn't that then break the conduit statement? Maybe it should be: conduit permit ip host 172.16.1.10 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 -Original Message- From: Karagozian Sarkis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Passed 640-603 (Routing) [7:46043]

2002-06-07 Thread Cody Lerum
Well, I guess being one of the first to take the new test, not in its beta form I owe you a little report. 55 Questions 700 To Pass It was a basic Cisco test, I think that they have heeded my previous comments and rephrased questions to make them less vague. Overall I think the dificulty may

RE: Networkers San Diego [7:45885]

2002-06-07 Thread Oleg Oz
My pigeons wont fly :( I'm not compliant :( Oleg. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46045t=45885 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and

Re: CCNP!! [7:46038]

2002-06-07 Thread Tom Scott
Chris Dumais wrote: I completed my 7 month journey today to become a CCNP with the completion of my CIT Exam. I got a lot of valuable information from this message board. Thanks for all of your input, it was very appreciated! Congratulations. Which version did you take: the old 640-506 or

Re: OSPF area 0 [7:45995]

2002-06-07 Thread Carroll Kong
If I remember correctly, yes, Area 0 routers must always have a way to connect to each other. It does not have to be a full mesh (if that is what you mean by contiguous). Three routers in a mesh would be fine if one link broke. Now, if an area 0 router loses all connectivity to the other Area

PIX525\Web Sense and Chat programs [7:46013]

2002-06-07 Thread Mears, Rob
Hello Cisco people We are using Web Sense to block most of the Sites that we feel necessary but have had problems with programs like AOL, MSN, ICQ chat programs. So I am going to stop this at the PIX and was wonder who out there had blocked Chat programs in the enterprise, and methods used. I

FXS cards - 1751 [7:45977]

2002-06-07 Thread George Siaw
Guy, Any ideas why there are only to voice ports to be configured? Runcorn-1750sh ver Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) C1700 Software (C1700-K8SV3Y7-M), Version 12.2(8)T1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) TAC Support: http://www.cisco.com/tac Copyright (c) 1986-2002 by cisco

DC Meeting/ Router Roast Saturday [7:45972]

2002-06-07 Thread Bruce Evry
Hello, Just a last minute reminder that there will be a meeting and lunch this coming Saturday, June 8, 2002 from Noon to 4 pm. Place will be my house: 1607 Thomas Road, Fort Washington, MD 20744 Bring Snacks, Sodas, Routers, Laptops, or just yourself if those things are

RE: Networkers San Diego [7:45885]

2002-06-07 Thread Tim Medley
How much for a private aerial tour of San Diego? :- Tim Medley - CCNP+Voice, CCDP Sr. Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld p 704.943.3615 f 704.525.9119 We've moved! As of May 6th, iReadyWorld is now located at: 8910-D Lenox Pointe Dr. Charlotte, NC 28273 -Original

RE: Question about the 350 series AP [7:45971]

2002-06-07 Thread Jeffrey Reed
The 350 series AP come with only the inline power injector. There's no option to have an old fashioned transformer hooked up like a 340AP. It does come with everything you need to get powered. Jeffrey Reed Classic Networking, Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: CCNP!! [7:46038]

2002-06-07 Thread Christopher Dumais
Thanks! I signed up last week, so I got the 506 exam. It definitely was as poorly written as everyone has been saying. I hope that the 606 exam is much better. Chris Dumais, CCNP, CNA Lan Analyst IT - NSS Networking Services Team Maine Medical Center (207)871-6940 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tom Scott

Re: CCIP vs CCNP vs CCIE - not very close at all [7:45893]

2002-06-07 Thread JohnZ
CCIP...Sure it smells like a new car. But if it doesnot require a hands on lab then it is just a few months away from turning into a paper cert. Perhaps you haven't looked at CCIE R/S closely but it does have Multicast on it and you can be sure you will be tested on it. But anyways I will

RE: PIX525\Web Sense and Chat programs [7:46013]

2002-06-07 Thread Brunner Joseph
forget the stupid attempts to block 5190/tcp, etc.. its best to completly route to null or deny traffic to the subnets involved. (smarter users will just specify to use 80 / tcp, and still get on) read this from a story about this.. As of 1:22 PM 11/21/2001 Login server names - set up a Deny

RE: CCNP EXAM [7:45901]

2002-06-07 Thread Subramanian, Kumaran (CAP)
Hi, The CISCO site infact says that the candidates already registered would be administered the old exam for which they have registered and that u can combine the old and new exam patterns for the certification. Chk out the link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/whats_new/

Re: NANOG 25 Meeting [7:45933]

2002-06-07 Thread Nigel Taylor
Howard, I see that Sue Hares will be doing the moderation for the Panel: Smart Routing Technologies, but she's not listed as giving any of the BOF's. Based on your statement I was thinking Sue would be doing a BOF or presentation on the BGP convergence drafts, which you mention she

Re: PIX 506 port translation with DHCP [7:45945]

2002-06-07 Thread Gaz
Pinging the Pix interface itself is not controlled by access lists. You need to use icmp deny any outside. If your pix doesn't allow the command, your image is too old for it. I can't remember exactly when it came in. The fact that you're using conduits suggests your Pix may have been there

Re: NANOG 25 Meeting [7:45933]

2002-06-07 Thread Nigel Taylor
Peter, Great! I'm thinking Juniper and the BearGear booth in such close proximity, may explain the cascading style format of the JunOS versus Cisco's left justified (non-hierarchal) based configuration. :- I'm sure Howard/Priscilla with their experience in software(system) development

RE: 40x/50x counting towards CCNP [7:45993]

2002-06-07 Thread Lee James
According to the website, the 50x exams can be substituted for 60x exams towards your ccnp. It doesnt mention the 40x anymore. So i think you need to take 3 more to get your ccnp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46050t=45993

RE: OSPF area 0 [7:45995]

2002-06-07 Thread Dusty Harper
The network doesn't totally hose. Basically you get a second backbone. This leads to basically two different networks. In the example you provided, The backbone is still contiguous An example or where this might occur would be __ Area | |--- --|__|C

RE: PIX525\Web Sense and Chat programs [7:46013]

2002-06-07 Thread Roberts, Larry
For aol just block access to the login servers. Login.oscar.aol.com ( it used to be this ) For Yahoo, it much more difficult, and time consuming. You will also inadvertanly block access to some portions of the yahoo website. I used a sniffer and my PC to see what servers that YIM logged into. I

Hardware requirements for actual BGP implementation [7:46053]

2002-06-07 Thread Leigh Anne Chisholm
I'm giving a BGP presentation next week and I just want to update myself on some items... Last I recall, the minimum amount of memory required to run BGP is 128 MB however 256 MB is recommended. Is this information still correct? Can a 2600 run BGP? Not that you'd want to see that, but is

RE: CCIP vs CCNP vs CCIE - not very close at all [7:45893]

2002-06-07 Thread Will Gragido
You know its funny. These conversations are about as fruitful as kicking a dead horse. The CCIP is geared more towards the same arena as Junipers certs, Lucent's certs, and certainly some of Nortels certs. The R/S CCIE is an ENTERPRISE, lets say it again kids, ENTERPRISE centric certification.

Re: Anniversary [7:45937]

2002-06-07 Thread Johnny Routin
They are sequential... JR Mark Odette II wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Does anybody know if the numbers are issued sequentially, or if they issue them pseudo-randomly, i.e., 7923, 7929, 7938, 7963, etc. Of course, this just came to mind Imagine the

Re: Hardware requirements for actual BGP implementation [7:46057]

2002-06-07 Thread John Neiberger
If you aren't taking full routes from two providers, I believe that a 2650 with 128MB would be fine. A 2620 or lower would not be the greatest choice. If you want to take full routes from two or more providers, you will need at least 256MB of DRAM which forces you to pick a different platform,

RE: CCIP vs CCNP vs CCIE - not very close at all [7:45893]

2002-06-07 Thread Mike Bernico
The CCIP isn't supposed to be a replacement for CCIE. CCIP is a professional level exam for service providers that don't need to know enterprise(read boring) things like bridging and dial and instead focuses on service provider technologies. That being said, I've completed two CCIP electives

Re: Hardware requirements for actual BGP implementation [7:46058]

2002-06-07 Thread Leigh Anne Chisholm
Actually, I am talking about full routes from two providers... I'm just wanting to verify my knowledge (which is typically based on what I've seen here previously). - Original Message - From: John Neiberger To: ; Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 1:53 PM Subject: Re: Hardware requirements

RE: CCIP vs CCNP vs CCIE - not very close at all [7:45893]

2002-06-07 Thread Will Gragido
I don't know that its harder more so than its just very different than what most people who've not worked within the SP realm are accustomed to. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Bernico Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 3:01 PM To: [EMAIL

Difference between stacking and interconnecting switches [7:46061]

2002-06-07 Thread George Kallingal
This may be a very basic question, but can someone explain what is the difference between stacking and interconnecting. I am looking into purchasing two Catalyst 2950T-24s. Now I know that you can connect the two catalysts using a crossover cable, but is that using the uplink port or any of

Re: Difference between stacking and interconnecting switches [7:46063]

2002-06-07 Thread IT
A stack of Catalyst switches is not just a connection of several switches. A stack of Catalyst switches combine to form a virtual single switch. George Kallingal wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... This may be a very basic question, but can someone explain what is the

Using Catalyst 2950 switch [7:46062]

2002-06-07 Thread George Kallingal
I want to use the Catalyst 2950T-24 in my Windows NT/2000 and Linux network. According to the specs, it states that it does provide 10/100 autosensing. I wanted to know if anyone has run into problem with the autosensing feature. Or should duplex be hardcoded? Thanks. George Message Posted

RE: Question about the 350 series AP [7:45971]

2002-06-07 Thread Larry Letterman
There is a power brick available for these. We have many installed in our buildings running on inline power and a few with the optionable power pack. Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of

RE: CCNP!! [7:46038]

2002-06-07 Thread Larry Letterman
Congrats and welcome to the next step up... Good luck with the next one... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Dumais Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 11:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

full routes via BGP: Cisco 2650 [7:46066]

2002-06-07 Thread Neal Rauhauser 402-301-9555
This one is taking full routes from UUNet and ATT without any special configuration. Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-IS-M), Version 12.1(5)T7, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) TAC Support: http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/ibld/view.pl?i=support Copyright (c)

passed routing today [7:46067]

2002-06-07 Thread Keith J.
Hi folks. I guess its time to start speaking up. I passed bscn today. I look forward to the information exchanged on this list. Thanks Keith Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46067t=46067 -- FAQ, list

Re: Using Catalyst 2950 switch [7:46062]

2002-06-07 Thread Shawn Heisey
Autosensing can work very well, depending on the NIC. It's important that both sides either be set the same. If one side is set for autosense and the other side is hardset, the autosense side will almost always pick half duplex. If you have any issues at all with autosensing, check layer 1,

RE: CCIE Lab Question Mark [7:45980]

2002-06-07 Thread Roberts, Larry
Engineering code doesn't have the ? Available. I had heard the same thing though Thanks Larry -Original Message- From: Moffett, Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 9:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE Lab Question Mark [7:45980] That's

Re: Hardware requirements for actual BGP implementation [7:46070]

2002-06-07 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 3:36 PM -0400 6/7/02, Leigh Anne Chisholm wrote: I'm giving a BGP presentation next week and I just want to update myself on some items... Last I recall, the minimum amount of memory required to run BGP is 128 MB however 256 MB is recommended. Is this information still correct? In the right

Re: full routes via BGP: Cisco 2650 [7:46066]

2002-06-07 Thread John Neiberger
How much free memory does this router have now? Neal Rauhauser 402-301-9555 6/7/02 3:17:06 PM This one is taking full routes from UUNet and ATT without any special configuration. Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-IS-M), Version 12.1(5)T7, RELEASE

RE: CCIE Lab Question Mark [7:45980]

2002-06-07 Thread Moffett, Ryan
I attempted the lab back in August of 2000. Granted that was the 2day format, but the ? was available then. To remove it would be absurd. -Original Message- From: Roberts, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 5:23 PM To: Moffett, Ryan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: full routes via BGP: Cisco 2650 [7:46066]

2002-06-07 Thread Neal Rauhauser 402-301-9555
This is a 2650 getting full routes from ATT and UUNet with a T1 to each provider. Total: 101929412, Used: 67234276, Free: 34695136 PID TTY Allocated FreedHoldingGetbufsRetbufs Process 0 0 75536 18084650980 0 0 *Init* 0 0752

Frame-Relay - [7:46076]

2002-06-07 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Sorry for posting this again Please check my logic on this frame-relay traffic shaping scenario: My Bc is 8,000 bits My Be is 16,000 bits My CIR is 64 Kbps If I send 1 burst of 56,000 bits then 4 bursts of 4,000 bits, after the 4th burst of 4,000 bits I will be able to burst again

PPTP outbound through PIX [7:46078]

2002-06-07 Thread George Kallingal
Is it possible to allow outbound connection to a Microsoft VPN Server (using MS PPTP) from a client machine behind a PIX 520 (IOS 5.2)? If so, what are the commands needed to configure the PIX. Diagram: client PC - PIX Internet --- VPN server Thanks. George

wireless feature set for 26xx series? [7:46079]

2002-06-07 Thread Neal Rauhauser 402-301-9555
Does anyone know what this thing does? I've been using 12.2T for IPv6 support and I just noticed the image below, labeled IP PLUS IPSEC 56 WIRELESS - is that for the 5.8 gig wireless NM? Anyone using this stuff in the field? c2600-ik8sw6-mz.122-8.T4.bin Message Posted at:

Re: Frame-Relay - [7:46076]

2002-06-07 Thread Steven A. Ridder
Tc = 1/8 of 1s by default. Therefore since you have 64000 as CIR, each TC can send 8k. If you send 4K, you still have another 4k to burst in that window. You can still send more, as most frame-switches police on 1 or 2 second intervals, so if you violate the Be for 1 or 2 Tc's it will even out

Re: Difference between stacking and interconnecting switches [7:46081]

2002-06-07 Thread Michael L. Williams
Although I've not used 'stacking' I've heard and read of it a small bit. It seems it's makes multiple switches appear as a single switch as far as managing the equipment. However, performance-wise, is there any gain to 'stacking' switches as opposed to simply interconnecting them. I'm not

RE: passed routing today [7:46067]

2002-06-07 Thread John McCartney
Congrats dude! Keep on going till you get that CCNP! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46082t=46067 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and

Re: Using Catalyst 2950 switch [7:46062]

2002-06-07 Thread Michael L. Williams
IMHO, you should always force the speed and duplex on both the switch and the end device. Autodetect can work find if both sides are set to autodetect, but if one side is set to a particular duplex and speed and the other is auto, you'll almost surely run into to problems (the least likely

  1   2   >