chris wrote
Those 2 switches are 2900s, not 3500s.
C2900XL POST FAILURE: Testing Switch Core: Failed
Chris you are wright, I mixed snippets, the error message is this:
.
C3500xl POST: Testing Switch Core: Passed
Error with Switch Core BIST test Phase 0.
Returns: Test Complete Low :
update of 3524XL firmware results in boot problems
In a network with twelve 3524xl switches and one 3508xl we updated to the
recent firmware image c3500XL-c3h2s-mz.120-5.WC3b.
This was successfull with 6 switches 3524 and the 3508; they are working
fine, showing up the features of the new image,
Hi Len,
You can use the following IOS for the IPSEC, there are two options; IOS with
3DES and FW options, another without FW option.
With FW Option:
File name: c1700-k9o3sy-mz.122-10a.bin
Description: IP/FW/IDS PLUS IPSEC 3DES
Minimum Recommended Memory to download image - 8 MB Flash and 32 MB
Hi Daniel,
Thank you very much for your info. Our customer is using NAT on proxy
server, not on the router. So as u said we can subnet further for two
group, in that case do I need to create sub int on the eth for two set of
group. So that one group will be have default gate-way of
Hi Group,
Can anybody please tell me if the the new Remote Access 640-605 exam has
simulation questions like in the new CCNA?
Thanks
_
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
If you have Device Fault Manager installed, it has a tab that you can set up
an email address or messaging phone number that will send you an alert if a
device goes down. The problem with it is that you can't change the message
that you get from CiscoWorks, which is a really vague alert saying
Yes, According to Cisco, the Routing and Remote Access Exams are the two
exams that have had simulations added to them.
Good Luck!
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Tunji Suleiman
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 5:17 AM
To: [EMAIL
I wanted to introduce myself. My name is Carl Timm and I'm the primary
author of the CCNP/CCIP BSCI Study Guide by Sybex. I'm also a CCIE in
Routing and Switching. I would like to answer any questions there may be
about the BSCI. If you would like to contact me, just put my name in the
subject
Can you get to the switch: prompt? Look at the password recovery procedure
for the steps. Take a look at the content of flash:. Maybe there are too
many files so your update didn't completely download.
www.cisco.com/warp/public/474/pswdrec_2900xl.html
Check out your boot variables. The image
Most definitely
Bill Creighton CCNP
Senior System Engineer
Motorola
iDEN CNRC Packet Data
-Original Message-
From: Tunji Suleiman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 5:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Remote Access 640-605 [7:48310]
Hi Group,
Can anybody
Hello,
I understand the differences between Cut-through and Store Forward. My
question is: How do you decide with method to use?, in whch situation have
you change the switching method?.
Thanks
Alejandro Acosta
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48316t=48316
Chuck wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
not so long as Cisco is making a bundle selling CCIE study books and
CCIE
Lab slots. ;-
I doubt that this is a serious concern. If this was Cisco's real
motivation, then why not just go all the way? For example, have
My guess is that you have a 7505 rather than a 7005 (no such animal). A 7505
has 7500 Series on the back (non-interface side) and 7505 on a sticker by
the power cord. The good news is that it accepts newer RSP cards.
I did compare a RSP2 to a RSP7000 and found that the connectors are
different.
I'm currently doing something that requires a particular piece of equipment
of mine be on the public internet. I have use of four public IP addresses
from my ISP, but for the most part I have just my PC's connected via my
firewall device, so that I am generally using only one of those IP's. Most
I have a date on Aug 15th in San Jose that I'd like to swap for October 8th
or earlier in San Jose.
Please contact me ASAP at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48320t=48320
--
FAQ, list
Looks like normal Internet behavior to me. The hackers are probably pinging
or port scanning. There's not enough info to tell. Also what is the time
between the attempts? If it's continuous or continual, then maybe you should
get worried. But, mostly I would just say, welcome to the Internet.
Alejandro Acosta Alamo wrote:
Hello,
I understand the differences between Cut-through and Store
Forward. My
question is: How do you decide with method to use?, in whch
situation have
you change the switching method?.
Thanks
Alejandro Acosta
A lot of switches support only one
Timur Mirza
Principal Network Engineer
Network Planning Engineering, West Region
15505-B Sand Canyon Avenue
Irvine, California 92618
Verizon Wireless
949.286.6623 (o)
949.697.7964 (c)
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48319t=48319
Anybody have experience with troubleshooting PIX-535 problems? I have one
that, when I boot it up, says:
Cisco Secure PIX Firewall BIOS (4.1) #0: Tue Dec 5 17:35:26 PST 2000
Platform PIX-535
hanging...
And then it just stays there. Does anybody have any idea what this means
or, more
I looked through the CCO, the groupstudy archive and my stack of cisco press
books, but I can't find any information about setting up an ACL for MAC
addresses. Has anybody done it before?
Here's what I'm trying to do: I've got a wireless access point that lets
just anybody join. I want to put
Dennis Laganiere wrote:
Here's what I'm trying to do: I've got a wireless access point that lets
just anybody join. I want to put a router upstream to block all but a
limited number of pre-defined MAC addresses. Any thoughts?
We had a PIX 506 with this problem. Field notice is at:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/770/fn15490.shtml
But, the field notice only applies to 506 and 515's.
We ended up sending ours in for replacement.
Dale..
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Love [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I have tried this before, but no results.
Tha MAC access lists can be used in two cases:
-When you are bridging
- When using CAR
HTH,
Hamid
Dennis Laganiere wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I looked through the CCO, the groupstudy archive and my stack of cisco
I believe that this functionality can be implented in the access point
itself. Probably depends on how feature-rich the AP is, however. I believe
the Cisco units can do this.
--
Jeff Harris - Cisco/Unix Engineer
CCNP - Cisco Certified Network Professional
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 06:03:50PM
Is there any way to disable the autodial for the VPN client?
I've a client who is remotely connecting to the network via dial-up using
Cisco VPN client. The problem is anytimes he connects to his ISP the VPN
client dialsup to connect to the network.
THanks
SM
Message Posted at:
Trick is you will have to deal with the timeout problem with your current
layout. Because all your Pleasanton extensions start with 6, and your RTP
numbers start with 6, the CCM can't tell from the first button how many
digits to expect. It would work better if you have an escape key for
As others have pointed out, having your upstream router act as a bridge is
your best bet. Out of curiosity, what brand of access point is involved? If
you haven't yet, you may want to see if the vendor has an updated firmware
available for download that includes the option for the AP to filter by
Does anyone know specifically what hardware Cisco
replaced to correct this problem? CPU? Motherboard?
RAM? NIC?
Thanks,
Mike
--- Dale Wishop wrote:
We had a PIX 506 with this problem. Field notice is
at:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/770/fn15490.shtml
But, the field notice
I think you could do what you want by using the rate-limit command (CAR)
with a mac acl. Just give the mac addresses you want blocked 0 bandwidth
and they're finished!
Enjoy!
JR
Dennis Laganiere wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I looked through the CCO, the
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Jeff Harris wrote:
I believe that this functionality can be implented in the access point
itself. Probably depends on how feature-rich the AP is, however. I believe
the Cisco units can do this.
It most certainly can, but obviously not on the AP that Dennis is using.
I
I was wondering if anyone would be willing to share their experiences, good
or bad, with Cable and Wireless or Genuity. I am thinking of getting some
upstream connectivity from them. Thanks in advance.
Guy H. Lupi
CCIE No. 9275
Message Posted at:
From the quoted page:
Workaround/Solution
Workaround
The only potential workaround is to reduce the traffic throughput level to
the point where the hang does not occur. Levels under 15 mbit/second may
be sufficiently low, however this varies from unit to unit and it may be
impossible to avoid
Thanks, but this doesn't answer my question. I read
this too...
Mike
--- Brian wrote:
From the quoted page:
Workaround/Solution
Workaround
The only potential workaround is to reduce the
traffic throughput level to
the point where the hang does not occur. Levels
under 15
I Have a 1720 router and when I boot the router I get flash not found. I
am new to these router and dont know where to start. How can I get the
latest flash and what tool do I need.
Thanks in advance
Len
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48340t=48340
I don't really see anything unusual. It's very common, and not unexpected,
for public IP addresses to be regularly scanned. The scanning may be
limited to simple icmp pings, or may be more sophisticated using tools like
nmap. To be safe, you should always harden any host that's going to
Hi guys,
I have an Aironet Bridge 500 that I tried upgrading the firmware to.
Cisco's website basically says that the 340 series and 500 series firmware
is the same.
So anyway, I tried upgrading it, and the radio crashed.
Now I am unable to console into the Aironet, and I can't get in through
Lupi, Guy wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I was wondering if anyone would be willing to share their experiences,
good
or bad, with Cable and Wireless or Genuity. I am thinking of getting some
upstream connectivity from them. Thanks in advance.
Are you
I'm sure you can find horror stories from some people with any large
provider even my favorite Qwest ;) I have worked with Genuity and the
person I worked with on setting up the peer was competent and we got it
working with no problems and reliability as far as I know has been
good. I can site
MADMAN wrote:
I seem to recall some Cisco switches that would perform
cut-through
switching until a configurable number of CRC's are detected and
would
switch to store-and-forward until errors cleared.
Dave
Oh, that's right! I meant to mention that in the message. Some switches
I seem to recall some Cisco switches that would perform cut-through
switching until a configurable number of CRC's are detected and would
switch to store-and-forward until errors cleared.
Dave
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
Alejandro Acosta Alamo wrote:
Hello,
I understand the
And another addendum. ;-)
Just wanted to mention that at first glance it may seem odd that your local
device is sending a reply, despite it also saying that access was denied for
the incoming message.
Based on a bit more testing we did offline, it appears that the reply is a
Destination
Since I do not see a bug, try the tac case option?
Bri
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Michael Gunnels wrote:
Thanks, but this doesn't answer my question. I read
this too...
Mike
--- Brian wrote:
From the quoted page:
Workaround/Solution
Workaround
The only potential
My intention is to buy an Aeronet 1200, which I believe will have much of
this functionality built in. For the initial testing I'm using an old
Lucent (Orinoco) access point that I had in my desk from the last time I
played with 802.11b two years ago. Since I've long since lost the cable and
You bring up some very interesting points, I will definitely look into some
of your suggestions. I am not comparing them to each other, just wanted to
get a general idea of peoples experience with their networks and customer
service. We will be providing the loops, we have some very good
This company is way too big. I am not particularly versed in exactly how
everything went down when the acquisition went through, but I do know I
worked for UUNET a while back and now I work for WorldCom. The part of
WorldCom that used to be called UUNET is in fact a huge money maker and I
We have been experiencing some toll fraud with our CallManager / Unity
system. Thanks to CCM traces we were able to find out exactly how they were
getting in. However, we still don't know who they are. The ANI on the
incoming calls was blocked (suprise suprise). What I'm wondering if there
is
Lupi, Guy wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
You bring up some very interesting points, I will definitely look into
some
of your suggestions. I am not comparing them to each other, just wanted
to
get a general idea of peoples experience with their networks and
first off, I don't know the answer to your question. Having just sold a
couple of AVVID's, I am interested, though in toll fraud and how it is
pulled off. I know that in the PBX world there are or were certain timeout
settings that generally had to be adjusted down to zero so that a hacker
My main objective is to get opinions from people who are customers of these
providers, I am just going to use them for plain vanilla IP transit with
BGP, no IPV6 or multicast or any value added services. To give you an idea
of what I am looking for, Internap is extremely reliable and I haven't
What OS version are you running? There is a bug in some serial numbers which
requires an eeprom command. I've the link at home computer and will mail it
to you when i get there. That will take care of it.
SM
- Original Message -
From: Dale Wishop
To:
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 11:40
The users are on the inside interface behind the PIX firewall and are trying
to make an pftp connection to the outside world. They are being authenticated
from the outside server but then the section hangs trying to do a list
command. The fixup protocol port 21 is enable on PIX and there is no
did you also allow port 22 (ftp data) on your PIX???
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Simer Mayo
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 4:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Passive FTP [7:48357]
The users are on the inside interface behind the
At 3:23 PM + 7/8/02, nrf wrote:
Chuck wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
not so long as Cisco is making a bundle selling CCIE study books and
CCIE
Lab slots. ;-
I doubt that this is a serious concern. If this was Cisco's real
motivation, then why not just go
I know this isn't cisco stuff but thought someone here could help.
Is there a way to have one 800 line and have it switched over to say any
one of 10 or fifteen users? And if another call comes through routed to
another person. Is this possible? Or would I need say 10-15 lines? The
other
one cisco doc says that the callin keyword is used on incoming or
received calls (which to me implies the CALLED router), while on another
it lists a config where it is configured on the CALLING router
actually, whatever side it's configured on, it works in my lab! still, i'm
trying to get a
Lupi, Guy wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
My main objective is to get opinions from people who are customers of
these
providers, I am just going to use them for plain vanilla IP transit with
BGP, no IPV6 or multicast or any value added services. To give you an
Looks like your returning traffic was blocked. Try active FTP.
Yoshi
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Simer Mayo
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 4:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Passive FTP [7:48357]
The users are on the inside
*cough*port 20 is ftp-data*cough* I'm sure it was a quick typing mistake
etc. I just wanted to make sure. :-)
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Charles D Hammonds
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 6:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
A great troubleshooting tool in this situation would be a packet grabber
such as EtherPeek. Capture traffic at the client location and at the outside
of the PIX. Compare what is happening to what is expected.
Without that information we can just guess.
Let's try to break the problem into smaller
Charles D Hammonds wrote:
did you also allow port 22 (ftp data) on your PIX???
FTP data uses port 20. That was probably a typo.
However, with passive FTP, that port number doesn't get used. Passive FTP
tells the server to wait for a connection request from the client. The
server replies with
I too would also be curious to see what Cisco pointed you to if anything.
-Original Message-
From: Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 6:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: h225 IE data [7:48352]
first off, I don't know the answer to your question.
I'm confused about a practice question for BSCN that I came across:
Your routing tables are getting very large and you need to configure route
summarization. How many class C internet addresses can you summarize with a
/20 CIDR block?
Answer: 8
Would it not be 16? Where am I going wrong?
--
I would say 16 as well.
Mike W.
Dain Deutschman wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I'm confused about a practice question for BSCN that I came across:
Your routing tables are getting very large and you need to configure route
summarization. How many class C
16 is the correct answer.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Dain Deutschman
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Class C summarization question [7:48367]
I'm confused about a practice question for BSCN that I
Thanks...it's good to know I'm not completely losing my mind. : )
Dain
Dain Deutschman wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I'm confused about a practice question for BSCN that I came across:
Your routing tables are getting very large and you need to configure route
I would say 8 is correct. 4 bits make 8 combinations.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Michael L. Williams
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Class C summarization question [7:48367]
I would say 16 as
Actually...4 bits makes 16 combinations( 2 to the power of 4 = 16 )
( 4 positions with 2 possibilities per bit position )
Dain
Andy Hoang wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I would say 8 is correct. 4 bits make 8 combinations.
-Original Message-
From:
Wow. According to my binary math, 4 bits = 16 combinations.
1 bit = 2 combinations (2^1 = 2)
2 bits = 4 combinations (2^2 = 4)
3 bits = 8 combinations (2^3 = 8)
4 bits = 16 combinations (2^4 = 16)
Now. when converting from binary to decimal, the 4th bit (from the
right) has a (decimal)
**
visit http://www.solution6.com
visit http://www.eccountancy.com - everything for accountants.
UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk
*
This email
FYI for who ever wants to knowA great website for learning subnetting
( actually learning the binary whys and hows instead of shortcuts ) is
www.learntosubnet.com
There are some great free resources...and very good explanations for those
who are just starting to learn it.
Dain
Michael L.
Is there any way to clear the MAC address from the Cisco router ARP table
individually?
I had removed the IP NAT statements and done CLEAR ARP on the routers, but I
am still able to ping the invalid IP address. I need to re-employ the IP for
other usage, but I encounters a clash of IP warning
71 matches
Mail list logo
