IP Telephony Beta [7:57425]

2002-11-14 Thread Shane Stockman
Is there an IP Telephony beta exam due to come out in November ? _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Message Posted at:

MC3810 - VoIP Requirements [7:57426]

2002-11-14 Thread HulaJoe
Hello All, I just purchased a 3810 to practice some Voice labs. I was hoping someone could answer a quick question for me. The 3810 I'm getting has 32 MB of RAM - Is this enough to run the 3810 as a VoIP GW ? Can someone give me some insight in regards to setting up the 3810 to support VoIP ?

LAN-toLAN VPN [7:57427]

2002-11-14 Thread Azhar Teza
Can LAN to LAN VPN be possible by having a PIX 510 at the corporate office and other branches let sayBranch 1 has 1720 router with T1 CircuitBranch 2 has VPN concentrator with T1 circuitBranch 3 has PIX with DSL CircuitBranch 4 has Router with DSL Circuit or all the branches should have the PIX

Re: Any good free security scanner? [7:57373]

2002-11-14 Thread Clayton Price
nessus, without a doubt. sam sneed wrote in message news:200211132214.WAA02579;groupstudy.com... These are OK for port scanning but do not really tell me about vulnerabilites like ISS does. I've gotten good replies off other lists all suggesting www.nessus.org . Another recommendation was

RE: NAT overload vs. static [7:57420]

2002-11-14 Thread Peter van der Voort
So if you have a router with S0 to the outside and e0 to the inside. Suppose you have an inside network of 10.10.10.0/24, where 10.10.10.30 is your webserver. Suppose the IP addres of S0 is 172.16.0.1 ip nat inside source list 2 interface serial 0 overload ip nat inside source static tcp

RE: OSPF adjacencies [7:57410]

2002-11-14 Thread _ OneZero543 _
I must admit that I only quickly scanned your post the first time and assumed that the trouble was MTU size. The IP OSPF MTU-IGNORE command (IOS 12.1(3))is a drastic measure for rare occasions, but Cisco IOS does not allow changes to the physical MTU size, so if you did have a mismatch (with IOS

full duplex or half duplex, how can you tell [7:57431]

2002-11-14 Thread John Tafasi
Hi, I have a cisco 2516 router with an ethernet interface. How can I find out if this inteface is full duplex or half duplex? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57431t=57431 -- FAQ, list archives, and

CCNP Recertification [7:57432]

2002-11-14 Thread boschloo
Hi, Anybody did the CCNP Recertification exam? What to focus on. And is IS-IS included in there? Gerwin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57432t=57432 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

RE: full duplex or half duplex, how can you tell [7:57431]

2002-11-14 Thread Dave Swink
John, It will be half duplex unless it has been configured for full duplex. Setting an ethernet interface to full duplex is done in software and requires a recent IOS. I have forgotten the minimum rev required but I know 12.2.3 will work. Dave Swink -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

Flash for 6500 SUPII [7:57434]

2002-11-14 Thread Jeffrey Reed
I'm working on a few 6500's and have some questions about flash: Cisco sells a 16M and a 24M version of the removable flash, can you use a larger flash card from a generic source? What's a good source to purchase flash? When running hybrid mode (MFSC=IOS, Switch=COS): Can you copy firmware and

Re: NAT overload vs. static [7:57420]

2002-11-14 Thread phillip sok
This can be done also. With PixOS version 6.0.x or higher this can be done static (inside,outside) tcp 1.1.1.1 80 192.168.1.1 80 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 access-list 100 permit tcp any host 1.1.1.1 eq 80 access-group 100 permit in interface outside Having said that, I prefer CheckPoint because

RE: LAN-toLAN VPN [7:57427]

2002-11-14 Thread Georgescu, Aurelian
Yes, You can mix VPN concentrators, PIX (ver. 6 and up with 3des) and routers (not sure about the minimum version). You can do a full mesh or hub-and-spoke topology. Aurelian Georgescu -Original Message- From: Azhar Teza [mailto:azhar_teza;excite.com] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002

Re: Fw: New CCIE Written Exam [7:57341]

2002-11-14 Thread Hixon James
Jim, How about Token Ring and IPX. Is there as much emphasis on the RIF and etc as there used to be. Also- how much VoIP and MPLS should we know. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57437t=57341 -- FAQ, list archives,

Re: Re: Fw: New CCIE Written Exam [7:57341]

2002-11-14 Thread B.J. Wilson
Am I the only one who gets the funny feeling that such questions violate the NDA? BJ ---Original Message--- From: Sent: 11/14/02 08:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Fw: New CCIE Written Exam [7:57341] xxx, How about Token Ring and IPX. Is there as much emphasis on

Frame Relay Definition [7:57439]

2002-11-14 Thread Aaron Ajello
I've been trying to clear something up about frame relay. Two books I've read say it is connection-oriented. But they also say there is no guarantee of delivery, best effort, etc. I thought the difference between connection-oriented vs. connectionless was pretty clear cut, so this seems to be

Re: Frame Relay Definition [7:57439]

2002-11-14 Thread B.J. Wilson
Good timing - we just had this conversation a couple of weeks ago. :-) There's a difference between a protocol being connection-oriented and it being reliable. The two are not related. Frame Relay is connection-oriented in that it establishes a connection between endpoints *before* any data is

RE: Re: Fw: New CCIE Written Exam [7:57341]

2002-11-14 Thread Clark, John
maybe.. but I too would like to know exactly how much focus the exam has on Token Ring and bridging (srb, rsrt, rsrb) and atm.. I do not think that violates the nda... now if you gave an example of a question - that would probably violate the nda. -Original Message- From: B.J. Wilson

Re: Frame Relay Definition [7:57439]

2002-11-14 Thread Aaron Ajello
Okay, so the connection is reliable and guaranteed, but data transfer...not so much. I get it. Thanks a lot. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57442t=57439 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

Re: full duplex or half duplex, how can you tell [7:57431]

2002-11-14 Thread Reinhold Fischer
John, Cisco's 25xx series uses the AMD Lance Chip for their 10Mbit Ethernet Interface. This Chipset does not support full-duplex at all. Router#show controllers ethernet 0 LANCE unit 0, ^ Have never used a 2516 myself but as far as i know it has a simple 10Mbit Ethernet Hub built in.

Re: RE: Re: Fw: New CCIE Written Exam [7:57341]

2002-11-14 Thread B.J. Wilson
You're right about giving an example of a question, but wouldn't the test's emphasis on one topic or another depend on what questions the candidate receives from the test engine? The only safe way to answer our (admittedly universal) curiosity is to visit these two CCO pages: R/S Exam Blueprint:

Re: full duplex or half duplex, how can you tell [7:57431]

2002-11-14 Thread The Long and Winding Road
John Tafasi wrote in message news:200211141056.KAA04663;groupstudy.com... Hi, I have a cisco 2516 router with an ethernet interface. How can I find out if this inteface is full duplex or half duplex? plug it into a full duplex 100 mbs switch port and see if link occurs? seriously, I believe

RE: Flash for 6500 SUPII [7:57434]

2002-11-14 Thread David Vital
I'm looking at a box of 20 meg Viking Components linear flash cards. The box they are in has a cisco sticker on it, so I don't know if they are just reselling someone elses product or if our supplier put that sticker on there. These are the ones I use on our 6500 serries switches. I should

Re: RE: Re: Fw: New CCIE Written Exam [7:57341]

2002-11-14 Thread alaerte Vidali
IPX are gone too. Right ? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57447t=57341 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL

IPSec Manual and SPI question [7:57448]

2002-11-14 Thread Cisco Breaker
Hi all, We are impelementing IPSec manual site to site because other site doesn't support IKE. I know that if you implement IPSec manual keying -- ACL's for crypto map entries tagged as ipsec-manual are restricted to as single permit entry and subsequent entries are ignored. -- The SAs

Strange Spanning-Tree Behavior [7:57449]

2002-11-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anybody know what is this? On interface fa0/24 of SW2, the state of spannnig-tree for Vlan1 was forwarding and for Vlan11 was blocking . All the values, bridge priority - port priority - port cost, were the default values. I expected both Vlans as blocking. The network is:

RE: Re: Fw: New CCIE Written Exam [7:57341]

2002-11-14 Thread Mirza, Timur
anyone studying for the ccie written should not depend on the anthony bruno text...it is totally irrelevant...i know from experience...are there any other study guides out there for the new ccie written? -Original Message- From: Clark, John [mailto:John.Clark;expanets.com] Sent: Thursday,

Re: Multiple CCIE qualification exams then labs? [7:57019]

2002-11-14 Thread J.D. Chaiken
I believe that all the VoIP images require 64MB. Though VoFR, VoHDLC, and VoATM are supported w/ 32MB HulaJoe wrote in message news:200211130159.BAA28992;groupstudy.com... Hello All, I just purchased a 3810 to practice some Voice labs. I was hoping someone could answer a quick question for

Re: RE: Re: Fw: New CCIE Written Exam [7:57341]

2002-11-14 Thread Madeleine Lam
I thought Token Ring and IPX were removed from the Lab exam, but they still stay on the CCIE written. Am I wrong? --- alaerte Vidali wrote: IPX are gone too. Right ? [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host

Re: Strange Spanning-Tree Behavior [7:57449]

2002-11-14 Thread Peter van Oene
Only one side of a given link will block and thus what you are seeing is normal behavior. On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 11:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anybody know what is this? On interface fa0/24 of SW2, the state of spannnig-tree for Vlan1 was forwarding and for Vlan11 was blocking . All

Re: RE: Re: Fw: New CCIE Written Exam [7:57341]

2002-11-14 Thread Persio Pucci
People, you that's for the Lab test... the written test still carries IPX, IGRP, Token Ring, etc... Persio - Original Message - From: alaerte Vidali To: Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:42 PM Subject: Re: RE: Re: Fw: New CCIE Written Exam [7:57341] IPX are gone too. Right ?

Re: Strange Spanning-Tree Behavior [7:57449]

2002-11-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Could you explain? Peter van Oene em 14/11/2002 10:28:04 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Assunto:Re: Strange Spanning-Tree Behavior [7:57449] Only one side of a given link will block and thus what you are seeing is normal behavior. On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 11:00,

RE: MC3810 - VoIP Requirements [7:57426]

2002-11-14 Thread James Willard
The MC3810 requires 64MB of RAM to run a VoIP feature set. You'll also almost certainly need 16MB of flash as well. To support the 64MB of RAM, you'll have to also get an updated BootROM. Those are free from Cisco's 1-800 line - part number BOOT-381V=. And of course, once you have all of that,

Re: full duplex or half duplex, how can you tell [7:57431]

2002-11-14 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
The Long and Winding Road wrote: John Tafasi wrote in message news:200211141056.KAA04663;groupstudy.com... Hi, I have a cisco 2516 router with an ethernet interface. How can I find out if this inteface is full duplex or half duplex? plug it into a full duplex 100 mbs switch port

Re: Strange Spanning-Tree Behavior [7:57449]

2002-11-14 Thread Larry Letterman
The root bridge will always be forwarding and the other end will be blocked in a network that is working correctly Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you explain? Peter van Oene em 14/11/2002 10:28:04 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Strange Spanning-Tree Behavior [7:57449]

2002-11-14 Thread Peter van Oene
Sure.. To really get into this, you need to dig into graph theory and the use of various algorithms to calculate minimal spanning trees (or shortest spanning trees etc). Doing this will help you understand much more than STP as used in 802.1D, but also most routing protocols as well.

Pad and Gain for voice [7:57460]

2002-11-14 Thread JJ Angleton
Does anybody have a good understanding (or better yet, a good URL) for when and how to apply pad and gain to a voip configuration? I looked through the Cisco website, but didn't find what I was looking for. Thanks. - Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the

Re: RE: Re: Fw: New CCIE Written Exam [7:57341]

2002-11-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I received an answer from Cisco saying that it was removed from written and lab after November 4th. But I would like to confirm that with guys that took the test. Just a yes or no (I think it has no problem with NDA) Madeleine Lam @groupstudy.com em 14/11/2002 14:07:36 Favor responder a

Re: Strange Spanning-Tree Behavior [7:57449]

2002-11-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maybe I was not clear about the problem. SW1 is the root for all Vlans. SW3 is the designated bridge for the link between SW2 and SW3. So, I expected port fa0/24 of SW2 be blocked for all Vlans. But it was forwarding for Vlan 1 and blocking for the others. After erased the configuration, reset

Re: Strange Spanning-Tree Behavior [7:57449]

2002-11-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter, if allow me to say so, your job is really nice. I understand that and it is the reason I said I have a strange behavior. SW2 should be blocking on interface fast0/24 for all Vlans. After the erase configuration, the reset and the configuration again, it result in the expected behavior.

Re: Strange Spanning-Tree Behavior [7:57449]

2002-11-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, I know it. SW1 is the root and all port are forwarding for all Vlans. The problem was is por 0/24 of SW2. It was not the root port or the designated bridge, but the state of por 0/24 for Vlan 1 was forwarding. For the other Vlans it was blocking, as expected. Larry Letterman

Re: RE: Re: Fw: New CCIE Written Exam [7:57341]

2002-11-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don4t think so, based on the following email. But I would like to be 100% sure that the guy who makes the tests knows it. Para: cc: Assunto: RE: Written and Lab CCIE R/S (EVA-Lite Redirect) Hello, That's correct. Steve

Re: full duplex or half duplex, how can you tell [7:57431]

2002-11-14 Thread sam sneed
this is about the comment You'd get a link but lots of collisions, eh? The half-duplex side would receive while it was sending, because the full-duplex side would send whenever it wanted. In other words, the 2500 side would report collisions, assuming there was enough simultanesous traffic. I

Re: OSPF adjacencies [7:57410]

2002-11-14 Thread Peter van Oene
On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 20:27, Jenny McLeod wrote: OK, I'll admit this is a real-life problem, not strictly a study question. Ack, I seem to have stirred something up here :-) I really didn't object to real life scenarios, just those that are ultra specific to a given network. Anyway, onward and

VoIP Question... [7:57468]

2002-11-14 Thread Andrew Dorsett
Hey everyone, I'm playing with an idea. I want to get ahold of a 3640 with FXO's and interface it to the PSTN and connect to some VOIP phones on a network behind it. I have done all of my research on the CCO and have found how to configure everything for phone connection and FXO configuration.

RE: full duplex or half duplex, how can you tell [7:57431]

2002-11-14 Thread Mossburg, Geoff (MAN-Corporate)
sam, I think the 2500 series uses the AUI port for Ethernet, so I think this is why the hardware doesn't support 100/full. I guess they had to make sacrifices for flexibility that, in hindsight, probably weren't necessary. GM -Original Message- From: sam sneed

Re: IP Telephony Beta [7:57425]

2002-11-14 Thread
There is a new Voice qualification exam for the communications and services CCIE due to come out towards the end of the month. Peter Shane Stockman wrote: Is there an IP Telephony beta exam due to come out in November ?

Re: full duplex or half duplex, how can you tell [7:57431]

2002-11-14 Thread Jenny McLeod
The Long and Winding Road wrote: John Tafasi wrote in message news:200211141056.KAA04663;groupstudy.com... Hi, I have a cisco 2516 router with an ethernet interface. How can I find out if this inteface is full duplex or half duplex? plug it into a full duplex 100 mbs switch port

CCIE Practical Studie - VOL II - out when?? [7:57473]

2002-11-14 Thread Cisco Nuts
Hello,Does anyone have any idea as to when the CCIE Practical Studie - VOL II will be out? If I understand, it's going to have some new stuff like QOS. I have been unable to find many examples for Qos on CCO, unlike for Ospf or Bgp etc.Are there any books/web-sites that have any Qos

Re: full duplex or half duplex, how can you tell [7:57431]

2002-11-14 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
sam sneed wrote: this is about the comment You'd get a link but lots of collisions, eh? The half-duplex side would receive while it was sending, because the full-duplex side would send whenever it wanted. In other words, the 2500 side would report collisions, assuming there was

Re: full duplex or half duplex, how can you tell [7:57431]

2002-11-14 Thread sam sneed
That was correct. I changed the speed to 10 full duplex and got the link a both sides. I just thought it was odd that one side(router) had the link light on but the switch didn't. Cisco3500-3#sh int fa0/17 FastEthernet0/17 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is Fast Ethernet, address is

Re: full duplex or half duplex, how can you tell [7:57431]

2002-11-14 Thread MADMAN
Heck when the 2500 was first introduced I don't know if 100M was even available and even if it was the CPU couldn't handle it. The 2514 could not drive it's 2 ethernets! Dave Mossburg, Geoff (MAN-Corporate) wrote: sam, I think the 2500 series uses the AUI port for Ethernet, so I

Re: OSPF adjacencies [7:57410]

2002-11-14 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Peter van Oene wrote: Nov 14 11:51:14.121 ESuT: OSPF: Rcv DBD from x.x.x.x on Channel6/0 seq 0x3DCDF2DA opt 0x2 flag 0x7 len 32 mtu 0 state EXCHANGE Nov 14 11:51:14.121 ESuT: OSPF: Send DBD to x.x.x.x on Channel6/0 seq 0x3DCDF2DA opt 0x42 flag 0x2 len 1472 My money is on either the

Re: RE: Re: Fw: New CCIE Written Exam [7:57341]

2002-11-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can someone please clarify this once for all if the following technologies are still being tested in the written exam or not: 1. IPX/SPX 2. Token Ring Many thanks, Arman Don4t think so, based on the following email. But I would like to be 100% sure that the guy who makes the tests

RIF URL changed...(Was: Re: New CCIE written exam) [7:57478]

2002-11-14 Thread Darren S. Crawford
It's now http://home.attbi.com/~blaga/rif.pdf HTH D At 10:40 PM 9/10/2002 +, Jim Tickle wrote: There's a good RIF document at http://home.attbi.com/~blaga/doingrifsv2.pdf Mark Godfrey wrote:I agree your not helping us by sharing the exact question on the test but you could open up a focus

RE: RE: Re: Fw: New CCIE Written Exam [7:57341]

2002-11-14 Thread Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1
These technologies are in the blueprint: Under General Networking Theory (802.x) under Bridging and LAN Switching: Transparent (IEEE/DEC Spanning tree, Translational, IRB, CRB, ACLs, MISTP) SRB (SRT/LB, SRT, DLSw, RSRB, ACLs) and under Desktop Protocols: IPX (NLSP, IPX-RIP/SAP, IPX-EIGRP, SPX,

Re: OSPF adjacencies [7:57410]

2002-11-14 Thread Peter van Oene
Both agree on the stubbiness of the area, so that should be fine. Bit 3 is the O bit and setting it refers to ones capability with opaque LSAs. Calling it Bit 3 is confusing. It's in the other nibble, for one thing. Agree. For some reason I decided to start counting left to right.

ccnp switching passed!!! [7:57482]

2002-11-14 Thread Leonardo Rocha
People, yesterday I took the 640-604 exam and passed with 901, I did spend 37 minutes to answer the questions which were so well defined. Used only the cisco press certification guide for the 504 exam and some lab, I can say the material for 504 covers very well the 604 contents. So, those who has

Re: CCIE Practical Studie - VOL II - out when?? [7:57473]

2002-11-14 Thread Jason Viera
This was Karl Solie's reply to this question in June, but haven't heard anything new. We have about 5 Chapters almost done. Including a huge 190 page QoS chapter, and two BGP chapters. We still are looking at getting this out by December or early next year. Mostly waiting on me...its tough

O/T too much time on my hands? [7:57484]

2002-11-14 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
I added a Topology Troubleshooting Puzzle to my Web site. It's not Cisco-specific. Well, to be honest, it's not even networking specific! ;-) But it does make you think and wonder how you could be so blind, if you're like me when I first did it. Be sure to actually try it before going on to the

Fw: RIF URL changed...(Was: Re: New CCIE written exam) [7:57486]

2002-11-14 Thread Dennis Laganiere
You'll find this and a few other free documents I wrote for the CCIE Written and Cisco Switching exams at www.laganere.net (which resolves to http://home.attbi.com/~blaga/index.htm). I'll try and dress up the webpage a bit in the next week or so... :-) --- Dennis - Original Message -

Port Address Translation [7:57485]

2002-11-14 Thread Steiven Poh-\(Jaring MailBox\)
Dear All, Any body know what is the PAT for TCP/IP printing? Please advice thanks... Rgds, Steiven Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57485t=57485 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

Re: CCNP Recertification [7:57432]

2002-11-14 Thread nettable_walker
I took the routing exam for the CCIP (I already have the CCNP) recently. I would recommend you know how to set up OSPF, RIP, IS-IS, BGP before taking ANY new Cisco exam. It's not like before. FYI --- you do not have to know how to configure the new Microsoft protocol, ISNT-ISNT boschloo

Online labs [7:57480]

2002-11-14 Thread jeff sicuranza
My online lab is now available. AMILABS online lab is now available.. Please email me for a ZIP file with a copy of the lab manual and some diagrams for your review… [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57480t=57480

Re: CCIE Practical Studie - VOL II - out when?? [7:57473]

2002-11-14 Thread Cisco Nuts
OK, Then Dec. it is!! From: Jason Viera Reply-To: Jason Viera To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Practical Studie - VOL II - out when?? [7:57473] Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 03:08:32 GMT This was Karl Solie's reply to this question in June, but haven't heard anything new. We have about 5

Re: OSPF adjacencies [7:57410]

2002-11-14 Thread Jenny McLeod
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: Peter van Oene wrote: Nov 14 11:51:14.121 ESuT: OSPF: Rcv DBD from x.x.x.x on Channel6/0 seq 0x3DCDF2DA opt 0x2 flag 0x7 len 32 mtu 0 state EXCHANGE Nov 14 11:51:14.121 ESuT: OSPF: Send DBD to x.x.x.x on Channel6/0 seq 0x3DCDF2DA opt 0x42 flag

RE: CCIE Practical Studie - VOL II - out when?? [7:57473]

2002-11-14 Thread Silju Pillai
I am borrowing the below link which was posted in another study group. It says Sept2003 :( http://www.pearsonptg.com/book_detail/0,3771,1587050722,00.html regards Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57490t=57473 --

RE: CCIE Practical Studie - VOL II - out when?? [7:57473]

2002-11-14 Thread Silju Pillai
Cisco Nuts, I think its you who has posted the same question in that group...:). I think you already have the answer...:) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57491t=57473 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

RE: RE: Re: Fw: New CCIE Written Exam [7:57341]

2002-11-14 Thread Silju Pillai
I passed the written exam yesterday. Do not confuse between written and lab exam topics. Cisco clearly says that IPX, Tokenring and IGRP is removed from the CCIE lab. For CCIE written, study all the topics thats given on the blueprint. regards Message Posted at:

Re: CCIE Practical Studie - VOL II - out when?? [7:57473]

2002-11-14 Thread Jason Viera
Apparently the timeline for the release has changes drastically from June! Thanx for the new info, Jason Silju Pillai wrote in message news:200211150610.GAA18387;groupstudy.com... Cisco Nuts, I think its you who has posted the same question in that group...:). I think you already have the