RE: Cat6500 PSU interoperability [7:60949]

2003-01-14 Thread Andrew Larkins
Many thanks to all that responded. Andrew -Original Message- From: Frank Jimenez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 January 2003 18:36 To: 'Andrew Larkins'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cat6500 PSU interoperability [7:60949] Yes and no. In combined mode they may be different

ICMP [7:61004]

2003-01-14 Thread maine dude
Hi All, Quick question- When a router sends a redirect to a particular host, how does the host remember to use this in the future, does the ICMP place an entry into the hosts routing table? Thanks in advance. -DJ - With Yahoo! Mail you can get a bigger

RE: ICMP [7:61004]

2003-01-14 Thread THANGAVEL VISHNUKUMAR MUDALIAR
Yes,the host places this entry into its routing table. -Original Message- From: maine dude [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 2:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ICMP [7:61004] Hi All, Quick question- When a router sends a redirect to a particular host, how

How many tunnels [7:61006]

2003-01-14 Thread Ciaron Gogarty
Hi Group, Does any one know offhand how many simultaneous tunnels a Cisco 3620 can handle (des and 3des)?? I can't find any hard evidence of this information on the cisco site... Thanks, CG ** This email and any files

RE: How many tunnels [7:61006]

2003-01-14 Thread Michael Tan
Maximum Number of Encrypted Tunnels Up to 100 encrypted tunnel on a 1700, up to 300 tunnels on Cisco 2600, up to 800 for 2650 with AIM-VPN/ EP, up to 800 tunnels for the Cisco 2600XMs, 2691, and 3725, up to 800 tunnels on Cisco 3620 and 3640, and up to 2,000 tunnels on Cisco 3660 and 3745.

RE: CSIDS - 9E0-100 [7:60920]

2003-01-14 Thread Kim Graham
Maybe I should have asked if anyone is studying for the CCSP? What exams have you accomplished and what is your next step? I may be amungst the group of first participants in this set of exams (v3) and others are waiting to get information concerning the exams before attempting. *grins* Kim /

RE: PIX commands- add ports [7:60976]

2003-01-14 Thread Kim Graham
This is a fairly good link on object groups. There is not an awful lot of information on them as of yet but possibly an advanced search off of the Cisco TAC website may pull some hits. I had asked my Cisco rep the same type of questions and this is what I was given.

RE: CSIDS - 9E0-100 [7:60920]

2003-01-14 Thread Hanna, Keith
Thinking about it at the minute. I completed CSS1 the same week Cisco announced the CCSP, so I only need to take the SAFE exam, but I'm not sure yet if I'll bother. My current position doesn't deal as much with security as I'd like (corporate team to do that), and if I changed positions/company, I

RE: How many tunnels [7:61006]

2003-01-14 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 10:19 AM + 1/14/03, Michael Tan wrote: Maximum Number of Encrypted Tunnels Up to 100 encrypted tunnel on a 1700, up to 300 tunnels on Cisco 2600, up to 800 for 2650 with AIM-VPN/ EP, up to 800 tunnels for the Cisco 2600XMs, 2691, and 3725, up to 800 tunnels on Cisco 3620 and 3640, and up

OT: Cisco Cache Engine Capabilities [7:61012]

2003-01-14 Thread YASSER ALY
Dear All, Anybody knows if any of Cisco Cache engines capable of caching read audio, read video, mp3 and exe files ? MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* Message Posted at:

RE: Learning PIX [7:60919]

2003-01-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The following script that you must put when inside network 172.16.1.0 want to access HTTP to outside and ping to outside: access-list inside_access_in permit tcp 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 any eq 80 access-list inside_access_in permit udp 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 any eq 53 access-list

RE: CSIDS - 9E0-100 [7:60920]

2003-01-14 Thread Andrew Larkins
I currently only have IDS (9E0-572) to go and am booked for next week Thursday at 10am and then I am CSS1 - apparently still valid until end Feb 2003. I will write the SAFE exam my early Feb 2003. Then I should be CCSP. After that a short break and then onto CCIE - somehow I think with the kid on

HIDS [7:61014]

2003-01-14 Thread Patrick Matthews
USing Cisco HIDS. I have 5 agents installed and running on 5 pcs, I have the console installed and running. All agents and console are fully licensed. I am running Version 2.5.3. the problem Iam expreiencing is that none of the agents show up in the console. If I do a network sniff I can see all 5

RE: CSIDS - 9E0-100 [7:60920]

2003-01-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, Me to appearing for CSIDS (9E0-572) .. do u know what sort of questions wud appear. I mean wud there be Match the following, Fill in the blanks or is it stimulation based one? I don't see much of commands (lots appeared in my MCNS exam though). What all topics to be prepared on CSPM and IDS

RE: CSIDS - 9E0-100 [7:60920]

2003-01-14 Thread Andrew Larkins
I have no idea what sort of questions - I am not really a fan of these total outlines that say what exactly you need to know - step by step. I feel that you must understand the concepts and be able to work it out - then you are OK. I am using the Cisco Press book at the moment and all is great

Low Latency Queue on ATM Subinterface [7:61018]

2003-01-14 Thread alaerte Vidali
The following LLQ is configured but no packets are going to the priority queue; all packets go to the default class: class-map match-all Priority-Queue match access-group name TV ! policy-map Policy class Priority-Queue priority 200 class class-default random-detect fair-queue

RE: Basic free training on the Switch 3550 [7:60989]

2003-01-14 Thread Lauren Child
The IPExpert.net tutorial is pretty good combined with the docs from CCO. http://www.ipexpert.net/downloads/Catalyst_3550_Tutorial.zip TTFN Lauren Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61019t=60989 -- FAQ, list archives,

RE: CSIDS - 9E0-100 [7:60920]

2003-01-14 Thread Hanna, Keith
Good luck!! (for the exam and the kid ) -Original Message- From: Andrew Larkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 January 2003 12:13 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CSIDS - 9E0-100 [7:60920] I currently only have IDS (9E0-572) to go and am booked for next week Thursday at 10am and

RE: OT: Confusion on CISSP requirements [7:60997]

2003-01-14 Thread Aaron Ajello
I'm studying for the CISSP test right now and have wondered the same thing. I've talked to two people that have taken and passed the test (and been confirmed by ISC2) and their jobs never were entirely security based but always had some degree of security responsibility, as you're saying. So I

RE: CSIDS - 9E0-100 [7:60920]

2003-01-14 Thread Hanna, Keith
Pass mark for me was 800 (back in November) There were no simulation questions on mine, but a combination of all others. I was asked about signatures, but tended to be general type questions rather than absolute specifics. more info can be found at:

IAS Authentication with Pix 515 [7:61023]

2003-01-14 Thread Kevin O'Gilvie
Hi All, Does anyone know how to make IAS use Active directory to authenticate VPN users.. I have the sample from cisco but that only displays local authentication.. Thanks a bunch, Kevin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61023t=61023

RE: QoS suggestion [7:60994]

2003-01-14 Thread John Humphrey
You've got a few options. The most basic (and most limited) is using IP RTP Priority. The will prioritize all RTP traffic on the applied interface. The best solution (IMHO) is to use LLQ. Low Latency Queueing can be thought of as CB-WFQ with the added benefit of a priority queue. This is probably

RE: QoS suggestion [7:60994]

2003-01-14 Thread John Humphrey
forgot to add one thing you probably already know this but if you decide to use LLQ for a PPP serial connection (like a t1 or frac t1) you will want to implement LFI (link fragmentation and interleave). this means that your config will be implemented on a multilink1 interface rather than

CCIE Written Study Material [7:61026]

2003-01-14 Thread Bob Henry
All, What is a good Book to use as a basis for studying for the CCIE written exam 350-001. I see this one on Amazon. 1) NLI's Study Guide for The CCIE RS Written Exam Please Advise, Bob __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable.

Re: IAS Authentication with Pix 515 [7:61023]

2003-01-14 Thread Patrick Matthews
I used the following document and it worked great - Very easy. Logs all VPN access in both the IAS log files and on the Domain Controller running AD. The 3rd part of the document explains the Win2k/IAS portion of the config.

Re: IAS Authentication with Pix 515 (Disregard) [7:61028]

2003-01-14 Thread Kevin O'Gilvie
I found it.. Thanks, Kevin - Original Message - From: Kevin O'Gilvie To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 10:16 PM Subject: IAS Authentication with Pix 515 Hi All, Does anyone know how to make IAS use Active directory to authenticate VPN users.. I have

RE: QoS suggestion [7:60994]

2003-01-14 Thread alaerte Vidali
Do you have experience with LLQ and MSFC that you can share? I configured LLQ but it seems packets are not going to the priority queue: class-map match-all Priority-Queue match access-group name TV ! policy-map Policy class Priority-Queue priority 200 class class-default

RE: QoS suggestion [7:60994]

2003-01-14 Thread John Humphrey
i don't see any obvious problems with your configuration. I can, however, offer a couple of troubleshooting tips. I would start by checking out the access list (show access-list) to make sure you have packets that qualify. Second (and this is where I think your problem is), I would lose the

Bridging and STP issue [7:61031]

2003-01-14 Thread John Humphrey
Does anyone know which version of IEEE STP bridge-groups use? Switches use the PVST+ (one spanning tree per vlan). However, I can't determine if router bridge-groups use PVST+ or the IEEE standard CST (one spanning tree instance for all vlans). Here's my delimna: I've got a 4006 (Sup II) with a

RE: CCIE Written Study Material [7:61026]

2003-01-14 Thread John Humphrey
I highly recommend Bruce Caslow's Bridges, Routers Switches for CCIEs. This book is the best I've seen. I've also heard good things about Internet Routing Architectures and Routing TCP/IP by Jeff Doyle. Hope this helps and GOOD LUCK on your studies. Message Posted at:

applying PIX access-lists [7:61033]

2003-01-14 Thread Sam Sneed
I am new to PIX and have a simple question. What methods do you (PIX Admins) use to change and apply access-lists. Unlike IOS access-lists it seems you can remove statements from the middle of the list. When you do this does the change occur immediately or do you have to reapply the access-group?

CCIE READING [7:61034]

2003-01-14 Thread Manny
Is this a good reading list a.. Routing TCP/IP Volume I (CCIE Professional Development) and Vol 2 by Jeff Doyle (Textbook Binding) b.. Internet Routing Architectures (2nd Edition) by Sam Halabi, Danny McPherson (Contributor) (Hardcover) c.. CCIE Practical Studies, Volume I by Karl Solie

RE: Confusion on CISSP requirements [7:60997]

2003-01-14 Thread William Gragido
Not necessarily Scott. You've got to be able to prove (in others words have documentable proof), that you've worked for a cumulative total of 4 years in the security field. Now, the caveat is that your work can be spread amongst the ten domains or relegated to one as long as your total time

RE: CSIDS - 9E0-100 [7:60920]

2003-01-14 Thread Kim Graham
Great to know I am not alone. I noticed you all were doing the earlier exam and not the new one. Any particular reason? From my understanding you can mix versions of tests to come to the same conclusion. Andrew I follow your same thought patterns to a point. It would not feel right getting a

RE: applying PIX access-lists [7:61033]

2003-01-14 Thread Waters, Kristina
Sam, I used to copy my list out to notepad and add the new line. Do a 'no access-list from-internet', then cut and paste the new one back in. Keep in mind this will briefly leave you with no access list on that interface. Then re-enter the 'access-group from-internet in interface outside'

Re: CSIDS - 9E0-100 [7:60920]

2003-01-14 Thread Marcin Strzyzewski
Andrew Larkins wrote: I currently only have IDS (9E0-572) to go and am booked for next week Thursday at 10am and then I am CSS1 - apparently still valid until end Feb 2003. I will write the SAFE exam my early Feb 2003. Then I should be CCSP. just my 0.02 euro: i completed CSS1 and passed some

Switching LAB [7:61038]

2003-01-14 Thread Richard Burdette
I've completed the BCSI and BCRAN exams toward the CCNP. I'm now working on the Switching test and wonder if my home lab is robust enough for the task. What I have is an old Cat5000 (w/ 12 port 10/100 blade) with a SUP I engine and a 1912. I know that I can play lab rat with many of the

PIX Logging [7:61039]

2003-01-14 Thread Azhar Teza
I have a PIX 525 with 6.1(1) version. I have setup a kiwi syslog server for logging. What is the best choice out of 0-emergencies-System unusable messages 1-alerts-Take immediate action 2-critical-Critical condition 3-errors-Error message 4-warnings-Warning message 5-notifications-Normal but

RE: CCIE READING [7:61034]

2003-01-14 Thread Azhar Teza
Add Cisco LAN switching to it. I would also recommend to have a William Parkhurst's BGP and OPSF Configuration books.--- On Tue 01/14, Manny lt; [EMAIL PROTECTED] gt; wrote: From: Manny [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:10:32 GMTSubject: CCIE READING

Re: Low Latency Queue on ATM Subinterface [7:61018]

2003-01-14 Thread YASSER ALY
Add the keyword log at the end of your access list and check whether there are really hits matching the ACL or not. Maybe everything is right and u are just sending another traffic not matching with the ACL. From: alaerte Vidali The following LLQ is configured but no packets are going to the

PIX access-list problem [7:61043]

2003-01-14 Thread Sam Sneed
I cannot seem to get the following config to work and am clueless why. My incoming access lists for DMZ and outside are wide open. The goal is not to NAT DMZ ever since its public addressing. I can't even ping hosts on the outside network from PIX. Why am I having these problems? nameif ethernet0

RE: ICMP [7:61004]

2003-01-14 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
=?iso-8859-1?q?maine=20dude?= wrote: Hi All, Quick question- When a router sends a redirect to a particular host, how does the host remember to use this in the future, does the ICMP place an entry into the hosts routing table? Yes, the host places the new routing info in its

Voip / Blocking special service numbers [7:61049]

2003-01-14 Thread UASAHIN
Hello All How can I block some special service numbers (like adult services ) on voice terminationrouter which is As 5300 with 1 E1 for outgoing call through pots. thanks in advance Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61049t=61049

RE: IAS Authentication with Pix 515 [7:61023]

2003-01-14 Thread Greg Owens Jr
By default, it should authenticate to AD first if it is part of the domain and you have to enable the user object to have remote connective. I did it three months ago. Greg Owens 202-398-2552 fax 202-399-7690 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On

RE: PIX access-list problem [7:61043]

2003-01-14 Thread Waters, Kristina
Sam, Do you have any sort of statement that's translating the addresses in your DMZ? For example, static (DMZ,outside) 141.152.135.23 141.152.135.23 netmask 255.255.255.255 If you aren't nat'ing I believe you still have to translate the address. HTH, Kris. -Original Message- From:

RE: ICMP [7:61004]

2003-01-14 Thread Black Jack
Hmm...that suggests that a VLSM-aware redirect would be useful. Send the mask along with the network address in other words. Does such a thing exist, or has it ever been proposed? Answer: The host can't know about subnet masks being used elsewhere. Also, with classless addressing, it can't

Re: Low Latency Queue on ATM Subinterface [7:61018]

2003-01-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trying to use the log keywork, I got the following message: class-map TV : access-list with 'log' not supported class-map Policy : access-list with 'log' not supported YASSER ALY @groupstudy.com em 2003-01-14 15:47:54 Favor responder a YASSER ALY Enviado Por: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: PIX access-list problem [7:61043]

2003-01-14 Thread Sam Sneed
This type of NAT is required for incoming connections. I can't get access going out so I haven't even looked at that yet. Even worse is from 83.23.44.60 (outside interface of PIX) I can't ping 83.23.44.50 which is outside of the PIX. If you look at my access-list , this should not be a problem. I

route-map deny_lo1 - now working?? [7:61055]

2003-01-14 Thread Cisco Nuts
Hello, I have a loopback interface 1 that I am trying to deny under redistribute connected under ospf but am having no luck? What am I doing wrong? Please advise. Thank you. Config: TS# interface Loopback1 ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 router ospf 100 redistribute connected subnets

Re: PIX Logging [7:61039]

2003-01-14 Thread MADMAN
depends what you want, you want it all pick 7 :) Dave Azhar Teza wrote: I have a PIX 525 with 6.1(1) version. I have setup a kiwi syslog server for logging. What is the best choice out of 0-emergencies-System unusable messages 1-alerts-Take immediate action 2-critical-Critical

Global Address and the Static command [7:61057]

2003-01-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Say I set up a global pool: Example - global 1 199.199.199.3-199.199.199.62 netmask 255.255.255.192 - NAT the inside LAN addresses. On my DMZ or internal network I want to create a static mapping to the mail server. My Question: Can I use one of the globally assigned address or do I

Re: route-map deny_lo1 - now working?? [7:61055]

2003-01-14 Thread Scott
It's a /32 and you are denying a /24. Try this: interface lo1 ip ospf network point-to-point or access-list 99 permit host 1.1.1.1 HTH, Scott Cisco Nuts wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello, I have a loopback interface 1 that I am trying to deny under

Re: route-map deny_lo1 - now working?? [7:61055]

2003-01-14 Thread John Neiberger
Hello, I have a loopback interface 1 that I am trying to deny under redistribute connected under ospf but am having no luck? What am I doing wrong? Please advise. Thank you. Config: TS# interface Loopback1 ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 router ospf 100 redistribute connected subnets

RE: applying PIX access-lists [7:61033]

2003-01-14 Thread Emilia Lambros
Why don't you try removing the line you want it to be below (as well as the deny ip any any at the end) then put in the new line, the next line(s) and the deny line? ie no access-list from-internet permit ip any host 10.10.10.4 no access-list from-internet permit ip any host 10.10.10.5 no

Re: ICMP [7:61004]

2003-01-14 Thread MADMAN
I think Priscilla gives some good reason why a VLSM-aware redirect may not be very effective. Also redirects for default route or networks outside of your IGP would be problomatic. Dave Black Jack wrote: Hmm...that suggests that a VLSM-aware redirect would be useful. Send the mask along

Re: applying PIX access-lists [7:61033]

2003-01-14 Thread Sam Sneed
The deny statement is there implicitly but if you put it in as well when you do a show access-list command you will see the staitisticsof how many times it was hit as far as your suggestion goes, it may not work as well if you have over 100 access-lists and you need to put one in lets say 8th

Prep Tests [7:61044]

2003-01-14 Thread Ed Williams
I know when I used to follow this group on a regular basis my following question was one of the most annoying... but I just looked back through the archives and didn't see anything recent. My CCNP has come up for recert and was looking for someone's opinion on the best prep tests for all 4 exams.

Call Manager CIPT Device Weights [7:61064]

2003-01-14 Thread Mark Smalley
I have a question for anyone with updated information on the Device weights for IPT devices. In looking through CIPT 3.1x course materials I am unable to locate the information/table that says how the devices are weighted. I am able to find the information in the CIPT 3.0x materials. Are the

RE: ICMP [7:61004]

2003-01-14 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Black Jack wrote: Hmm...that suggests that a VLSM-aware redirect would be useful. Send the mask along with the network address in other words. Does such a thing exist, or has it ever been proposed? I don't think such a thing has been proposed. Also, it may not be practical. The router

RE: PIX access-list problem [7:61043]

2003-01-14 Thread Evans, TJ (BearingPoint)
Is your outside link up, and plugged into an enabled switch port that is on the correct vlan/segment and set to correct speed/duplex? Can other devices on same switch communicate with anyone else? Thanks! TJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Sam Sneed [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: CCNP 640-604 switching exam [7:60987]

2003-01-14 Thread Nuurul Basar Mohd Baki
The exam that I take on Monday 13/1/03 still got a few HSRP question. -Original Message- From: David Ristau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 January 2003 06:03 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCNP 640-604 switching exam [7:60987] Taking the 640-604 switching exam within the next

Re: route-map deny_lo1 - now working?? [7:61055]

2003-01-14 Thread wanabe ccie
i think there is no way to deny that route when using ACLs because ACLs doesn't filter LSAs. make your area an NSSA, then do a no-redistribute, to filter out redistributed routes (your TS router will be an ASBR). Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61067t=61055

EIGRP issues [7:61068]

2003-01-14 Thread Edward Sohn
Can anyone figure out why my dial backup solution is not establishing EIGRP routes? The routers don't peer up, though everything else looks and works fine. After the dialup establishes, I am able to ping each Serial Interface, as well. Thanks, Ed Here are the configs: ROUTER

RE: applying PIX access-lists [7:61033]

2003-01-14 Thread Emilia Lambros
Nope, wouldn't work well in that situation, but if you're only talking a few entries then its not a problem Also, in that sort of situation if you wanted to put a deny before a permit (where order really does matter other than aesthetically), you remove the line permitting the traffic, add the

Re: applying PIX access-lists [7:61033]

2003-01-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sam, you can do 2 method ie: CLI based and GUI based (PDM). If you using PDM, you just insert add rule it. CLI based: 1. access-list from-internet2 permit ip any host 10.10.10.1 access-list from-internet2 permit ip any host 10.10.10.2 access-list from-internet2 permit ip any host

RE: EIGRP issues [7:61068]

2003-01-14 Thread wanabe ccie
i think you should do a dialer map broadcast on router b too just like what you did on the first router. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61072t=61068 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

RE: Global Address and the Static command [7:61057]

2003-01-14 Thread wanabe ccie
you can do both. if i wanted to use an ip in the middle of your pool, say 199.199.199.35: ip nat pool test prefix-lenth 26 199.199.199.3 199.199.199.34 199.199.199.36 199.199.199.62 - (i think this is the command, please verify) ip nat inside source list 1 pool test ip nat inside source static

RE: QoS suggestion [7:60994]

2003-01-14 Thread Ivan Yip
Hi, I have the following testing setup but it looks like the LLQ does not work. Can you have a look on it? When the 256k link was congested. Why I ping the prec. 5 packet behind the 256k line it only have the same response time with default ping? 128k--- FR 256k Attached 256k router

BGP origin attribute type e - EGP? [7:61075]

2003-01-14 Thread Wei Zhu
In what condition is the EGP origin type generated? Thanks Wei Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61075t=61075 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct

RE: EIGRP issues [7:61068]

2003-01-14 Thread Karagozian Sarkis
Edward, Since you are using PPP Authentication Chap, it requires that both sides send (same) user name xx and Password .. to each other (Handsahing using chap) after dialup, to authenticate each other both ways, then start data transfer. So, on Router B, u need to add: username

Cisco 3640 Router ATM PVC Problem [7:61077]

2003-01-14 Thread Ken Chipps
I am attempting to setup a PVC between two Cisco 3640 Routers connected back to back. The interface is an OC3 card. Whenever I issue the PVC command on the ATM interface it says a PVC is not supported. If I use the ? to see for supported commands for the interface, no PVC command is listed. Is

FW: Cisco 3640 Router ATM PVC Problem [7:61077]

2003-01-14 Thread Newell Ryan D SrA 18 CS/SCBT
What commands are you typing in? To create a PVC the syntax is int atm 1 atm pvc 6 0 106 aal5snap I think you are missing the 'atm' before pvc. There are several ways to hook the 3640s back to back. If they are within fastethernet distance limitations you could use the fastethernet interfaces.

RE: Cisco 3640 Router ATM PVC Problem [7:61077]

2003-01-14 Thread Ken Chipps
I am using a sample configuration from cisco that looks like this First command config t Second command ip routing Third command interface atm 1/0 Fourth command no shutdown Fifth command ip address 10.0.2.1 255.255.255.0 Sixth command pvc 1 32 Seventh command protocol ip 10.0.2.2 broadcast The

RE: Cisco 3640 Router ATM PVC Problem [7:61077]

2003-01-14 Thread Newell Ryan D SrA 18 CS/SCBT
Try to add atm in front of that. -Original Message- From: Ken Chipps [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:23 PM To: 'Newell Ryan D SrA 18 CS/SCBT'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco 3640 Router ATM PVC Problem [7:61077] I am using a sample configuration from

Re: Cisco 3640 Router ATM PVC Problem [7:61077]

2003-01-14 Thread The Long and Winding Road
pvc x/y should work, which leads me to wonder about your IOS version. What are you running? what is the image name? I do not see an atm pvc command in the 12.1 command reference. also you mention something about connecting two 3640's back to back via an OC3 card? I'm not sure you can do that.

RE: CSIDS - 9E0-100 [7:60920]

2003-01-14 Thread Andrew Larkins
Only reason for the earlier exam from my side was the book we had. And also to get me off my butt - sometimes I can be a little lazy!!. At least with a deadline, I have to write!! -Original Message- From: Kim Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 January 2003 19:36 To: [EMAIL

RE: PIX Logging [7:61039]

2003-01-14 Thread Andrew Larkins
Thats relative to what you want to see and also depends on the volume of traffic passing. You could choose level 7 and then turn off some messages on the PIX and revise later. -Original Message- From: Azhar Teza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 January 2003 20:37 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]