Hmm, never done it with a 6509, but have done it plenty of times with
35xx and below switches, and they work fine.
I'm not familiar with the Altiris implementation of a PXE server,
however you could check that the basic services required for PXE can
traverse the switch ports.
>From memory, these
I have found it easier, and perhaps easier to audit, if you have the VPN
box reside in parallel on the outside, but terminate the inside of the
VPN box in one of your firewalls' DMZ sections.
This allows you to place firewall rules on all traffic coming through
and report easily on them. It also k
summarization comes to mind. So does secondary addressing, GRE tunnels, and
other exercises in convolution.
--
-
Bullwinkle: Hey, Rocky, watch me pull a CCIE out of my hat!
Rocky: Bullwinkle, that trick NEVER works
Bullwinkle: This time FOR SU
We run PXE srevices thru our 6509 switches in the Engineering
Data Center in Cisco. All that was required was allowing the
subnet to do DHCP. Portfast is on all our switches by design,
and the DHCP server scope has PXE BOOT setup...
Larry Letterman
Network Engineer
Cisco Systems
> -O
You can summarize the non-classful routes using the area range command at
the ingress point inside the ospf domain. OSPF would pass these classful
(summarized) routes into IGRP. IGRP will then be able to interpret these as
valid routes.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f
sir,
just redistribute the ospf route into igrp and add that major network bit
boundy ip address route using "network" command in igrp..
exampe;-
router igrp 2
redistribute ospf 1
network 192.168.10.0 > major network ip address
default-metric 1000 10 1 255 1500
(igrp is classfull so it can
Thanks for the clarification, this makes it clearer.
Eric
- Original Message -
From: "Vikram JeetSingh"
To: "ericbrouwers" ;
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 1:28 PM
Subject: RE: CAS and CCS - out-of-band and in-band [7:66607]
> Yah Eric you mentioned almost all of them rightly, but I wou
Hi John,
This a cut from my running-config, I have ppp encapsulation specified, why
are the calls HDLC framed?
interface Ethernet0
ip address 192.168.10.21 255.255.255.0
!
interface BRI0
ip address 192.168.11.1 255.255.255.0
encapsulation ppp
dialer map ip 192.168.11.2 name RouterB 014198656
Hi Priscilla,
Yes you are quite right, good to finish off these threads by confirming what
the solution to my problem actually was!
It was the 'logging monitor debug' global config command that made the debug
output start coming through to my telnet session.
Still don't really understand why as
Show PPP mulitlink says there are no active bundles.
I tried debug isdn q931 and this is what I got:
RouterA#debug isdn q931
ISDN Q931 packets debugging is on
RouterA#
8w3d: %ISDN-6-LAYER2UP: Layer 2 for Interface BR0, TEI 70 changed to up
8w3d: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0:1, changed state to
I took it 2 weeks ago, passing score was 706 and I scored 800. Need to know
your ISDN and Frame Relay pretty well.John McCartney wrote:
>
> Passing score is 760, took it last Dec, its a bear, took it
> 2X's. Studyup on protocols. HTH's
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php
Interesting advice, I take my last (hopefully!) CCNP exam next Saturday. I
need a rest, have gone through the CCNA then straight into the CCNP path in
9 months having had no prior experience on Cisco technologies.
I am hoping the CCNP will now get me a chance to work in a Cisco shop where
I can bu
Tim, If you're in London, Netlogic Consulting are the cheapest I think.
www.netlogicconsulting.com
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66918&t=66825
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.co
I think I can add my 5 cents in here. I believe any certification is good
the more you have the broader range of knowledge you will have. I believe
the Cisco certification is great and I grade it at the top, the reason is
the broad range of knowledge. The telecom world is huge and just knowing all
Does anyone know what the cost is for networkers? I can't seem to find the
cost on the site. Thanks.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66920&t=66920
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy
Hi All,
I am trying to better understand a particular BGP scenario, thought
someone might shed some light. This is probably very simple, i am just
missing the punchline. If you have 2 routers, one let's say running in AS100
the other running in AS200, and you had to EBGP peer with 128.1.1.254
Larry, what's the "costly upgrade" all about? I saw two 48-port 10/100/1000
blades introduced. One is for "performance" and the other for "value". Do
both need the upgrade to the chassis?
Thanks!!
Jeffrey Reed
Classic Networking, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[
I believe i is $1650.00 for full registration. I found a site that has
information on the 2002 costs and frequently asked questions.. hope this
helps..
http://www.juicemedia.com.au/cisco/networkers2002/faqs.htm#4
Sal
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66922&t=6692
Wouldn't all microsoft products be required to set this value to 0x1? We
might have to take them to court to get this to happen.
;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay
Greenberg
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
depends if its ever worked before?
could be a cabling issue if its never worked before. I like to have a
loopback cable/adapter to plug into the ports in these cases to see if I get
a response from the 2511.
if it was working before and now its not, its probably because a previous
seesion is stil
unless the peers are on the same segment, you also need the neighbor
ebgp-multihop command configured on both routers.
HTH
--
-
Bullwinkle: Hey, Rocky, watch me pull a CCIE out of my hat!
Rocky: Bullwinkle, that trick NEVER works
Bullwinkle:
If you were given the networks:
192.168.1.0
192.168.2.0
192.168.3.0
192.168.4.0
192.168.5.0
192.168.6.0
192.168.7.0
192.168.8.0
192.168.9.0
192.168.10.0
192.168.11.0
192.168.12.0
192.168.13.0
192.168.14.0
192.168.15.0
192.168.16.0
192.168.17.0
192.168.18.0
192.168.19.0
How would I create a filte
I have to agree that it is a bit silly, dangerous, and should not be done on
a production enviornment.. but so are a lot of scenarios on the CCIE Lab..
Just to add to the sillyness:
Not sure how this would work, but you can try it.. have you tried as-path
manupulation? From what I can see you wan
Thx, I found a way to get the price by downloading the pdf files they have
for faxing in your registration rather than doing it online.
""Salvatore De Luca"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I believe i is $1650.00 for full registration. I found a site that has
> information on the 2002
anytime... ;)
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66931&t=66920
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 04:22 PM 4/2/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>150.50.200.0(R1)(R2)--(R3).
>
>R1 belongs to AS1
>R2 belongs to AS2
>R3 belongs to AS3
>
>I inject 150.50.200.0 using the network command on R1 and see 150.50.200.0
>in R3 with as_path of 2 1.
>
>The question is how can I remove the 1 from the As Path
If I may...
I've had my CCNP for some time now and am trying to work towards the IE.
This year, my company put out a new product which requires a Linux platform
on the network. Since I am in the Operations side of the house, I was sent
to Red Hat training to support it. The Final Course was the R
you could check the archives. this question comes up about every two weeks
or so.
hint: what makes a number odd or even? what makes a binary number odd or
even?
1001 = odd
00011100 = even
11101011 = odd
1000 = even
just to name a few.
once you get the idea, the access-list will be easy
The new 48 port 10/100/1000 module will require a new SUP720 or sup-3 as
some are calling it..
It may also require a SFM module. The sup 3 will require a new fan tray and
I believe power supplies...
The info is a little sketchy at this time, but that is what we have
heard..thats a lot of
upgrading
I was thinking maybe.. 192.168.1.0 0.0.254.255 because all the odd's end in
a 1 bit for the 3rd octet.. just wanted to be sure.
Thanks
Sal
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66935&t=66927
--
FAQ, list archives, and s
How about a syslog server?
mail server?
AAA server?
webserver?
""George"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> actually this is question i have to answer in my assignment. i am also not
> able to understand it correctly as its not clear.
> we can assume any server. can u help me in this
>
>
At 08:26 PM 4/5/2003 +, Salvatore De Luca wrote:
>I have to agree that it is a bit silly, dangerous, and should not be done on
>a production enviornment.. but so are a lot of scenarios on the CCIE Lab..
>Just to add to the sillyness:
Because it is silly and dangerous, you also can't do it with
At 03:46 PM 4/5/2003 +, Salvatore De Luca wrote:
>Hi All,
>
> I am trying to better understand a particular BGP scenario, thought
>someone might shed some light. This is probably very simple, i am just
>missing the punchline. If you have 2 routers, one let's say running in AS100
>the other
You are both right.. but the problem scenario does'nt give you that mutch
info.. I am trying to deduce all and any ways of going about possible
peering 128.1.1.254. The scenario does not specify if it is a directly
connected peer on the lan segment. That is why I tried updating the source
to the Et
I hear ya.. that's why if this was a TEST situation, the statement:
ip as-path access-list 1 permit _2_ & ! _2_ _1$ would permit routes
traversing AS2 but deny any routes traversed though AS2 Originating in AS1.
In which case 150.50.200.0 aggregated element should be the nlri "Fresh
Route" point f
The question makes very little sense. Among other things, it refers
to the "server" as part of the "backbone." Bad idea. Routers and
switches define backbones.
Yes, the server could have multiple infrastructure functions. Is that
a good idea, considering security and availability? What can ge
In other words, for purposes of testing, there are ONLY two ways to remove
things from the AS_PATH. 1) the technique you describe, which is to create
an aggregate and advertise that aggregate only ( although refresh my
memory - an aggregate might still contain full AS_PATH information - don't
have
I'm also working on my CCNP, and at the same, keeping note of whatever I've
learnt to ease my burden on the progress for CCIE.
Good luck in your CCDP/CCIE.
Kenneth
Sudarshan N Chari wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Just coming back from the exam room. Passed Support exam, my
> last one
> that was remai
Larry, I was in San Jose last week, where a number of 65xx product people
presented some good detailed information. If my Cisco SE lives up to his
promise of distributing the slides, I'll forward you a copy.
The SUP720 ( NOT Sup 3 ) includes a built in SFM, as well as built in MSFC
capability. The
Hiyah everyone,
I'll be sitting for the BCRAN Beta exam on the 15th. From the Cisco website,
I found that there are some new topics introduced, such as VPN and DSL. Does
anyone know where I can obtain information on those topics?
Also, it seems that Cisco has removed X.25 from the exam.
Regards,
Going through NLI b..o..o..t..c..a..m..p lab 2, I'm finding myself a bit
confused about the applicability of the neighbor next-hop-self and next-hop
command.
Let me summarize my "beliefs", recognizing that real world has a different
set of problems, where these lab thoughts do not apply.
1) eBGP
""Salvatore De Luca"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I believe i is $1650.00 for full registration. I found a site that has
> information on the 2002 costs and frequently asked questions.. hope this
> helps..
>
> http://www.juicemedia.com.au/cisco/networkers2002/faqs.htm#4
>
> Sal
And
Hi,
I have 3 questions regarding CCIE voice:
1. I took beta written test today and was told that I can expect a
result in 6-8 weeks. Does it really take that long? How do they contact
me? I only provided my SSN and name before the test.
2. If I go take the lab test, I know I'll get a Cisco D
Agreed by me.. the trick is it seems that we want to remove AS1 from the
AS-path without filtering the whole IP Block. As long as AS2 Can Create the
route you want advertised to R3,(Network Statments pointing to Null route
injections will do this and put it in the BGP table). You can then filter
ro
How are you scheduled to take the exam when according to the Cisco web
site (http://tinyurl.com/8wuf) the last day to test was April 4, 2003?
-Original Message-
From: Kenneth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2003 7:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Going For BCRAN Be
From: "Sudarshan N Chari"
Subject: Passed support Exam [7:66885]
Just coming back from the exam room. Passed Support
exam, my last one that was remaining to achieve CCNP.
---
Hi Sudarshan,
I am about to take it -- like you then, as the last
one left to achieve C
correction. it should read in para #2 "... i apply an acl on the
inbound e0 to block tcp traffic destined for the 172.20 internal
network from the 10.2.100 one unless it is established by the 172.20
network." i'm fading fast...
sorry for the confusion.
- Original Message -
From: garre
Sorry I don't have an answer for you, just a question.
How was the written exam? Was it mostly protocols remembering, or was it
more of a CCNP level questions (configurations, troubleshootings, etc.)?
Would you say the exam was tougher than you anticipated (CCIE R&S level)?
Regards
Message Post
I'm having a bit of confusion about the role of output queues when dealing
with input queue drops as explained by Cisco guidelines on the matter:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/itg_v1/tr1915.htm#xtocid4
I understand input drops occurring when the router is receiving incoming
pac
""supernet"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi,
>
> I have 3 questions regarding CCIE voice:
>
> 1. I took beta written test today and was told that I can expect a
> result in 6-8 weeks. Does it really take that long? How do they contact
> me? I only provided my SSN and name before the
50 matches
Mail list logo
