RE: Off-Topic: MCSE 2000 Listservers?

2001-02-06 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
Try http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/winnt-l.html If you are good try www.experttraining.net They offer a MCSE Windows 2000 boot camp for $2500 until March 5. Regards, Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lee Miller Sent

Trunking Modes in production environment...

2001-02-11 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
Hi All, I have been struggling all morning trying to understand the difference between the "auto" mode and "desirable" mode. The only difference I have found is that : Auto+Auto = no trunking, where as Desirable + Desirable = trunking Apart from that the Auto and Desirable behave the same way.

SNMP Server

2001-02-11 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
HI All, I am looking for a SNMP server freeware that works with Windows 2000. I don't need anything fancy. I just want to collect traps from the network and examine them. Thank You, _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/ci

frame-relay

2000-12-22 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
I have spent many hours trying to comprehend the exerpt bellow (from Cisco CD). Still no light. Can someone help? "This command is typically used for subinterfaces; however, it can also be used on main interfaces. Using the frame-relay interface-dlci command on main interfaces will enable the

Frame-Relay (urgent)

2000-12-22 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
Hi Chuck, I have sent countless messages to the group. None seem were posted Would you post the following for me this is kind of urgent. (Is there a filter somewhere for people who ask dum or too many question??) Thanks, Pierre I have spent many hours trying to comprehend the exerpt bell

RIP Version 2 Authentication

2000-12-27 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
I have 2 routers Router A and Router B. Router A and B both run RIP Version 2 I want Router A to require authentication from Router B before Router A can accept Router B updates. On Router A I have added the following: ***configuration mode** key chain Tewa key 1 key-string abcdefg ***

Challenging !

2001-01-12 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
I been it on it since 4am. Still can't figure that one out ... >From Cisco: "After the token is claimed and changed to an information frame, only stations with priority higher than the trasmitting station can reserve the token for the next pass around the network. When the next token is gener

CCIE Case Scenario

2001-01-12 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
I've been on it since 4am. Still can't figure that one out ... >From Cisco: "After the token is claimed and changed to an information frame, only stations with priority higher than the trasmitting station can reserve the token for the next pass around the network. When the next token is genera

CCIE Case Scenario

2001-01-12 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
controller looks at the T (token bit) and the PPP (priority bits) to determine if it can seize the token and transmit data. There is no mention of looking at the RRR bits to determine if a controller can seize the token. -Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex GUANEL [mailto:[EMAIL

PIX Box [7:6170]

2001-05-28 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
Hello Group, I bought a PIX box at an auction. I am not sure whether it was a good/bad buy. (Paid $475 for it). By comparing the front and rear view of the box to cisco website: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/fw.htm I have identified the box as a PIX Firewall 520. The IOS on it is

TCP Delayed ACK Timer [7:34150]

2002-02-01 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
Does Cisco support delayed ack timers? In Microsoft TCP/IP implementation, delayed ack timers are used on the receiver to force an acknowledgement when packets are received out of sequence and the receive window has not yet be filled to its threshold. Thanks, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at:

RE: TCP Delayed ACK Timer [7:34152]

2002-02-01 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
standard? How do you go about finding out how close your network vendor follows the RFCs? (by looking at the commands?) Thanks, Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex GUANEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 6:15 PM To: Cisco Subject: TCP Delayed ACK Timer

RE: TCP Delayed ACK Timer [7:34150]

2002-02-02 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
r is just forwarding packets that happen to carry TCP, it wouldn't get involved in ACKs at all. With Telnet, I bet it's especially not relevant, because the PSH bit gets set which probably resets the ACK timer and forces a (non-delayed) ACK. Priscilla At 07:14 PM 2/1/02, Pierre-Alex GUA

RE: TCP Delayed ACK Timer [7:34152]

2002-02-02 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Thank you! Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 8:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TCP Delayed ACK Timer [7:34152] At 07:23 PM 2/1/02, Pierre-Alex GUANEL wrote

ISDN T [7:35441]

2002-02-14 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
Stupid question that is bugging me Why are Cisco native ISDN interfaces labeled with S/T rather than T? Cisco routers do not provide an interface for other capable ISDN devices You plug the Ethernet cable to the NT1. So shouldn't the interface called a T? Pierre-Alex Message Post

RE: ISDN T [7:35446]

2002-02-14 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
Just speculating on my own question: Could it be because Cisco routers have a built-in NT2, so they are providing both S and T interfaces? (Even though the S interface do not connect to anything!) Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex GUANEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent

RE: ISDN T [7:35441]

2002-02-14 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Thanks Chris, Can I assume from your last statement that ISDN capable Fax machines, printers, telephone... are not very wide spread? I have never seen any of the above devices myself, but since I live in small town in the middle of no where ... Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EM

Hold1 , timers versus time [7:35908]

2002-02-19 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
Can someone please explain me what the "hold" timer is and what the difference between "times" and "timers" is? I can't find documentation on this. (this is from the command "show span" Times: hold 1, topology change 8960 hello 2, max age 20, forward delay 15 Timers: hello 2,

RE: Hold1 , timers versus time [7:35910]

2002-02-19 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
Resent -Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex GUANEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 4:51 PM To: Cisco Subject: Hold1 , timers versus time Can someone please explain me what the "hold" timer is and what the difference between "times"

RE: Hold1 , timers versus time [7:35910]

2002-02-19 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
/29_35wc/cr/clicm ds.htm#xtocid21946105 shows similar output without really explaining it. For more detailed explanations see: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat5000/rel_5_2/cmd_ref/ sh_sp_te.htm#21020 and check out the "show spantree statistics" area. > -Original Me

Trunk Modes Perspective [7:36016]

2002-02-20 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
In the "real world" when would you set a trunk type in "auto" rather than "desirable"? Both will be triggered when the connected device is set to "on", "desirable" (or auto when setup with "desirable"). Thank you, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=

RE: Trunk Modes Perspective [7:36016]

2002-02-21 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
ts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 10:28 AM To: 'Pierre-Alex GUANEL'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Trunk Modes Perspective [7:36016] ... And the answer comes from ... you guessed it ... "Cisco LAN Switching" by Clark and Hamilton. page 320 "The

RE: Trunk Modes Perspective [7:36016]

2002-02-21 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
Thanks, sometimes I forget the obvious :) Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: McIntosh, Leslie (US - Tulsa) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 3:54 PM To: 'Pierre-Alex GUANEL'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Trunk Modes Perspective [7

Port Secure not working ? [7:36267]

2002-02-22 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
I was expecting to see a FastEthernet 0/26 ENABLED after the configuration below. Instead it is disabled. Any ideas? Thanks, Pierre-Alex Switch1(config)#int f 0/26 Switch1(config-if)#port secure max-mac-count 1 Sw

FW: Port Secure not working ? [7:36278]

2002-02-22 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
Problem solved . port secure was to enabled! Thanks! Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex GUANEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 2:56 PM To: Cisco Subject: Port Secure not working

Bit / bytes [7:36562]

2002-02-26 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
Is conversion of bits into bytes and vice versa a function of Layer 1 or Layer 2? I have seen contradictory info. (I would say it is a layer 2 function because Layer 1 is only physical matters like voltage etc... but some one may have a logic to prove me wrong) thanks, Pierre-Alex Message

FW: Spanning tree Protocols Questions [7:36565]

2002-02-26 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Question (1) Is the first part of this statement correct? I have looked at the 801d paper for an answer but I am still uncertain. "In blocking mode, an interface will receive and send BPDUs but not send and receive data traffic. " Question (2) Are blocked port considered part of the

RE: Spanning tree Protocol Questions [7:36559]

2002-02-26 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Thank you!!! Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sasa Milic Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 7:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Spanning tree Protocol Questions [7:36559] Comments inline ... Pierre-Alex wrote: > > "In b

RE: Bit / bytes [7:36562]

2002-02-26 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
This is clear. Thank you! Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 8:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bit / bytes [7:36562] Layer 1 just understands bits. Hardware, in ge

Re: Spanning tree Protocol Questions [7:36559]

2002-02-27 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Priscilla, In the attachment (Cisco CCNA Exam Guide #640-507 Certification Guide: ISBN 0-7357-0971-8), page 167 - 168, the authors seem to indicate that CBPDUs are sent from blocked ports! The ability for CBPDUs to be sent out of blocked port seems to a determinant factor for the Spanning Tree t

RE: Spanning tree Protocol Questions [7:36559]

2002-02-27 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
; From: Pierre-Alex Guanel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 1:46 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Spanning tree Protocol Questions [7:36559] > > > Priscilla, > > In the attachment (Cisco CCNA Exam Guide #640-507 > Certification Guide: ISBN

RE: Spanning tree Protocol Questions [7:36559]

2002-02-27 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Never mind ... I think I got it! Thanks, Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex Guanel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 4:10 PM To: Daniel Cotts; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Spanning tree Protocol Questions [7:36559] So a blocked port can

RE: Spanning tree Protocol Questions [7:36559]

2002-02-27 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Yes that is what I concluded There is only 1 thing ... doesn't switch 3 send BPDUs as soon as it enter Listening mode? Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 4:40 PM To: 'Pierre-Alex Guanel'

RE: Spanning tree Protocol Questions [7:36559]

2002-02-27 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
OK it's clear now! I got the credit card out. Will buy the book online, tonight after class!!! Thanks again, Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 4:52 PM To: 'Pierre-Alex Guanel'; [EMAIL PROTECT

VLSM and CIDR [7:37031]

2002-03-01 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
If a routing protocol can do VLSM does that automatically mean that it can also do CIDR? Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37031&t=37031 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy

RE: VLSM and CIDR [7:37031]

2002-03-01 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
The statement that provoked my question is from RFC 1721. They say "Subnet masks are also necessary for implementation of "classless" addressing, as the CIDR work proposes" thus the question "if a routing protocol supports subnet mask does that automatically mean that it can do CIDR? ( I think

RE: VLSM and CIDR [7:37031]

2002-03-01 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
uot; > > I also know from long lab rat experience that it is not a problem with OSPF. > > I have not tried with either IS-IS or Ripv2, but again, why not? > > there may be issues with older IOS code. Some vendor older models may not > support it. But I have no reason based on

RE: VLSM and CIDR [7:37031]

2002-03-01 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
ot a problem with > OSPF. > > > > I have not tried with either IS-IS or Ripv2, but again, why not? > > > > there may be issues with older IOS code. Some vendor older models may not > > support it. But I have no reason based on my experience, to believe that > it

RE: Well it's my turn...CCIE#8878 [7:37145]

2002-03-04 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Congratulations! Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard Newman Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 8:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Well it's my turn...CCIE#8878 [7:37145] With many hours of reading and hands on, not to ment

RE: CCNP exams [7:38097]

2002-03-13 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Just to make sure: Student A passed is CCNP last week. His certification is valid for 3 years, regardless of changes in the content of the exams or the certification. Correct? Thank you, Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ladr

Route-map - Boson - incorrect? [7:38553]

2002-03-16 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
Here are two statements from BOSON and their associated answers: "When a Match is made, the Route Map can change the route with the map-tag command (TRUE)" "When a Match is made, the Route Map will change the route with the set command. (FALSE)" (1) is there such a thing as a map-tag command.

FW: Route-map - Boson - incorrect? [7:38554]

2002-03-16 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
-Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex GUANEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 1:55 PM To: Cisco Subject: Route-map - Boson - incorrect? Here are two statements from BOSON and their associated answers: "When a Match is made, the Route Map can change the

RE: BGP Issue... [7:38877]

2002-03-19 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
The routers can be logically connected. However, to my knowledge, the best practice is that they are directly connected. Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stanzin Takpa Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 5:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Sybex CCNP Lab [7:39527]

2002-03-26 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Hi, I have a few questions regarding Sybex CCNP Virtual Lab. SWITCHING: GENERAL INFO: a) How many Catalyst 5000 switches can you configure in the software? b) If more than 1, can you create a dual core with layer 2 / layer 3? c) What is the supervisor revision number? d) What software relea

MAU 8228 [7:39891]

2002-03-29 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
Has anyone used the IBM 8228 Token Ring MAU with Cisco routers? Do you recommend the product? Thank you, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39891&t=39891 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: h

RE: MAU 8228 [7:39892]

2002-03-29 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
-Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex GUANEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 9:22 AM To: Cisco Subject: MAU 8228 Has anyone used the IBM 8228 Token Ring MAU with Cisco routers? Do you recommend the product? Thank you, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http

Logging - terminal monitor not working [7:39957]

2002-03-30 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Kind of a silly problem but can't figure it out ... I am connected to R1 via telnet. I have turned on debugging of ip packets I also have issued the command "terminal monitor" Yet I do not get anything logged when I ping the Ethernet interface of R1 Any ideas? Thanks

RE: Logging - terminal monitor not working [7:39957]

2002-03-30 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Lidiya White -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pierre-Alex Guanel Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2002 3:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Logging - terminal monitor not working [7:39957] Kind of a silly problem but can't figure it out ...

RE: Logging - terminal monitor not working [7:39957]

2002-03-31 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
# Version Found12.0(7)T 12.0(6)S Fixed-in Version12.2(5) > > ## Release Notes > > ## > > ## The logging synchronous line configuration command may > > ## cause logging to stop. > > ## > > ## Workaround: Remove this command. hth Reinhold Pierre-Alex Guanel

Best place to prepare for CCIE? [7:40362]

2002-04-03 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
I lost my job in the US and I have to relocate. Which country would you go to? thanks Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40362&t=40362 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupst

PIX Configuration [7:28631]

2001-12-10 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
>From a client (inside) I can ping the inside interface of the PIX . >From a client (outside) I can ping the outside interface of the PIX. However no (inside) client manages to ping or do any sort of traffic with hosts outside the PIX. Do you spot where my problem is? Thank you!!! BTECHPIX#

TACAS + and RADIUS Authentication [7:33371]

2002-01-27 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
Can TACACS+ or RADIUS be used to authenticase users that are NOT dialing in? (For example can I use either technology to authenticate users telneting directly to a router?). Thanks, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33371&t=33371 --

TACAS + and RADIUS Authentication [7:33372]

2002-01-27 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
Can TACACS+ or RADIUS be used to authenticase users that are NOT dialing in? (For example can I use either technology to authenticate users telneting directly to a router?). Thanks, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33372&t=33372 --

RE: TACAS + and RADIUS Authentication [7:33372]

2002-01-27 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
. Oletu - Original Message - From: Pierre-Alex GUANEL To: Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 11:43 AM Subject: TACAS + and RADIUS Authentication [7:33372] > Can TACACS+ or RADIUS be used to authenticase users that are NOT dialing in? > > (For example can I use either technology to aut

Poison Reverse and RIP [7:33402]

2002-01-27 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
Cisco does not seem to support poison reverse for RIP and RIP version 2. Do you know network vendors who do? Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33402&t=33402 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info

RE: Poison Reverse and RIP [7:33402]

2002-01-28 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
p1-r1(config-if)# -Original Message- From: Phil Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 8:03 AM To: Pierre-Alex GUANEL; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Poison Reverse and RIP [7:33402] Whe

RIP holddown timers - Not used by default? [7:33426]

2002-01-28 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
I wanted to test whether the holddown timers of RIP work. The all in one CCIE guide say that hold-down timers in RIP are not used by default. EXPERIMENT : I setup p1-r1, and p1-r3 with RIP using the Default timers: Configuration on p1-r1 was: (router rip, network 10.0.0.0) Configuration on p

RE: RIP holddown timers - Not used by default? [7:33426]

2002-01-28 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
t was originally poisoned out, it will be accepted - regardless of the status of the hold down timer. Try taking the route out and putting it back up right away. See how long it takes before it shows back up. Pierre-Alex GUANEL wrote: > > PROBLEM: > > I wanted to test whether the holddown t

CCIE written / Lab ... partner [7:40781]

2002-04-07 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
Anyone in Warsaw (Poland), preparing for the CCIE written / Lab? Please contact me of line. Thank you, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40781&t=40781 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: htt

TACACS+ [7:41095]

2002-04-10 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
I am using Cisco Secure ACS v2.6 I can't find the location in the software where I can set the commands users can use (Authorization). Can you give me a hint? thank you, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41095&t=41095 -

RE: TACACS+ [7:41103]

2002-04-10 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
I have read the documentation for ACS v2.6 I went to IOS commands (under group) in the IOS Commands sections I am getting error message whenever I enter something in the "command" and "argument" window. (for example: configure terminal gives me the error "exec terminal:incorrect format" Any id

Cisco Market Place [7:41336]

2002-04-12 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Do you have to be a Cisco reseller to order directly from Cisco Market Place? In the Networking Products Market Place homepage, when I use the Internet Commerce Agreement Link (ICA), it asks me to select a region; then get the message: "Your Cisco.com user profile does not contain the necessary I

Token Ring Errors - Simulating [7:41497]

2002-04-15 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Do you know tool(s) that can generate Bad Token ring frames, duplicate tokens, etc... ? I would like to check my Token Ring troubleshooting skills. thank you! Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41497&t=41497 -

RE: US Robotics modem to Cisco 2514 [7:41894]

2002-04-18 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
If you remove the "modem autoconfigure ..." as Mark suggested, then you will need a modem chat script. "modem autoconfigure ..." will work fine on an US Robotics Sposter with pin 3 and 8 down You should reverse telnet to the modem and type "at&F" and enter. Then you type "ati4" and enter (even

RE: Token Ring Errors - Simulating [7:41497]

2002-04-19 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
riginal Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pierre-Alex Guanel Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 8:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Token Ring Errors - Simulating [7:41497] Do you know tool(s) that can generate Bad Token ring frames, duplicate tokens, etc... ?

output buffers swapped out [7:41985]

2002-04-19 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
(resent) Can't find any explanation on CCO about "output buffers swapped out" (Ethernet interface) Any one has a definition of what it is and what could cause 146399903 "output buffers swapped out" on an Ethernet interface? thank you, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.c

RE: output buffers swapped out [7:41986]

2002-04-19 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Answer to my own question: on 7500 routers when the "transmit-buffers backing-store" command is enabled and the transmit queue is full, packets are swapped from the MEMD into DRAM. If the command is not enabled (default) then packets are dropped. A high occurrence of "output buffers swapped out"

TAC [7:42141]

2002-04-21 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
You have worked with TAC on a case. The problem is resolved. Who will close the case? The TAC engineer or the customer Thanks, Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42141&t=42141 -- FAQ, list archives, an

RE: TAC [7:42141]

2002-04-21 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 10:08 AM To: Pierre-Alex Guanel Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TAC [7:42141] In my experience, either side can close the case. I've had TAC close cases that were not even close to being resolved. I assume that there's some type

RE: TAC [7:42141]

2002-04-21 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
I called TAC this morning. I had no problem getting through. If you are in the US, the number is: 1 800 553 2447 Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steven A. Ridder Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 10:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] S

All-In-One CCIE Study Guide - Second Edition [7:42292]

2002-04-22 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
If the second edition of Giles' book a reliable study source. I read that the first edition was crippled with mistakes and I would like to know if all of them got fixed in the Second Edition. Thank you! Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42292&t=42

RE: All-In-One CCIE Study Guide - Second Edition [7:42292]

2002-04-23 Thread Pierre-Alex GUANEL
To: Pierre-Alex GUANEL Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: All-In-One CCIE Study Guide - Second Edition [7:42292] Pierre, I am reading the second edition at the moment. Will go for the written tomorrow. Until so far I like the book very much, although it still contains errors. K. Koen Zeilstra

RE: All-In-One CCIE Study Guide - Second Edition [7:42292]

2002-04-24 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
confusion. Passed the written. Hurrah!! Very few BGP questions. Lot of TokenRing. You better learn the Rossi Paper! Good luck on yours. regards, Koen On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Pierre-Alex GUANEL wrote: | Koen, I was referring to the book written by Roosvelt GILES. | | By the way, how was the written? I

bit time [7:44142]

2002-05-14 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
I am looking for a good definition of "bit time" I found on a networking encyclopedia that "bit time is the same as bit rate i.e. the ratio of the number of bits transferred between devices in a specific amount of time, typically a second." I am not satisfied by this definition. For example in t

bit time [7:44144]

2002-05-14 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
I am looking for a good definition of "bit time" I found on a networking encyclopedia that "bit time is the same as bit rate i.e. the ratio of the number of bits transferred between devices in a specific amount of time, typically a second." I am not satisfied by this definition. For example in t

RE: bit time [7:44144]

2002-05-14 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Thank you Remmert. Can I assume that with a 16 Mb Token ring a bit time would be 16 bits per seconds? Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of C restion Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 6:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: bit time [7

CCIE written Commands [7:44730]

2002-05-22 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Just curious Do I need to review all my routing and switching commands for the CCIE written? Boson #3 have no emphasis on commands but Boson #1 does. Thank you, Pierre-Alex P.S. I assume this question does not violate the NDA . Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f

RE: Check My EIGRP Configuration [7:45065]

2002-05-26 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Looks good ... I would also add a bandwidth statement on the serial interfaces to specify 64 Kbps This way the metric calculated by EIGRP will match your actual network bandwidth This would make a difference if your network became more complex ... Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From:

RE: ISDN-PRI-BRI [7:45083]

2002-05-26 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
You need the ISDN switch or switch simulator Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Juan Blanco Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2002 10:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ISDN-PRI-BRI [7:45083] Team, We have a 7200 with the following inter

RE: ISDN-PRI-BRI [7:45083]

2002-05-26 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
This is is really cool! I was not aware of this. Thanks, Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steven A. Ridder Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2002 12:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ISDN-PRI-BRI [7:45083] Here's the links I hav

TCP IP Sequence numbers [7:45131]

2002-05-27 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
I understand that when a host is sending an acknowledgement, it indicates to the target the NEXT segment number that it expects to receive. When host A sends acknowledgement number X to host B, why does B sets its sequence number to X+1? I would expect B to set its sequence number to X, since X i

RE: Check My EIGRP Configuration [7:45065]

2002-05-27 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Best of luck to you! Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 2:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Check My EIGRP Configuration [7:45065] Dear Kris, Karago, Pierre-Alex, Chuck, Steven, Brian and everybody thanks

RE: TCP IP Sequence numbers [7:45131]

2002-05-27 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TCP IP Sequence numbers [7:45131] At 07:37 AM 5/27/02, Pierre-Alex Guanel wrote: >I understand that when a host is sending an acknowledgement, it indicates to >the target the NEXT segment number that it expects to receive. It's kind of a picky thing, b

CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535]

2002-05-31 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
I took the CCIE written yesterday afternoon and passed (80%) I was expecting more, but I flunked the performance/QoS section of the exam, which I neglected somewhat during preparation. I used both Boson #1 and Boson #3. Those 2 tests are complementary and are NOT substitute for each other. Boso

Re: CCIE Written passed - Boson [7:45535]

2002-05-31 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
The IOS documentation has a section on QoS. Check CC0 Regarless of your method of preparation you need to take some test to check your understanding. Boson was a great help in that matter. Good luck on your exam. Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=

Frame Relay Traffic Shaping - [7:45962]

2002-06-06 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Please check my logic: My Bc is 8,000 bits My Be is 16,000 bits My CIR is 64 Kbps If I send 1 burst of 56,000 bits then 4 bursts of 4,000 bits, after the 4th burst of 4,000 bits I will be able to burst again but not before that. Correct? Here is my rational (Assume no congestion in the frame-r

RE: To much! [7:45865]

2002-06-06 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Try exercising... It does increase mental stamina. Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45965&t=45865 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct

Frame-Relay - [7:46076]

2002-06-07 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Sorry for posting this again Please check my logic on this frame-relay traffic shaping scenario: My Bc is 8,000 bits My Be is 16,000 bits My CIR is 64 Kbps If I send 1 burst of 56,000 bits then 4 bursts of 4,000 bits, after the 4th burst of 4,000 bits I will be able to burst again but

Re: Frame-Relay - [7:46076]

2002-06-09 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Steven, thanks for the answer. I am still have questions ... Where do I find original documents on Frame-Relay? Thanks Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46172&t=46076 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscript

CCIE R&S vs CCIE Design [7:46173]

2002-06-09 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
A question to the current CCIE R&S and CCIE Design engineers. How much design do I need to learn for the CCIE R&S? Obviously not as much as the CCIE Design. But where do I draw the line? How much is too much, taking in consideration that I am planning to sit for the lab 9 to 12 months from now

RE: SNMP Management Using a Switch [7:46196]

2002-06-11 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Switches can do Layer 3 switching (hardware base routing) if they have a router module or a router switch feature card. Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 8:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ISDN -- challenge! [7:46496]

2002-06-13 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Router A and Router B are connected to an Atlas 550 via BRI interfaces Router A ATLAS --- ROUTER B Both router are configured with DDR Dialer maps so that Router A can call router B or vice-versa (basic stuff). When Router A is called by Router B, Router A answers normally and the link goe

ISDN ....Challenging Problem! [7:46500]

2002-06-13 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Posted to Cisco Newsgroup at 3:30 on June 13, 2002 Router A and Router B are connected to an Atlas 550 via BRI interfaces Router A ATLAS --- ROUTER B Both router are configured with DDR Dialer maps so that Router A can call router B or vice-versa (basic stuff). When Router A is called by

RE: ISDN -- challenge! [7:46496]

2002-06-14 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
>From router B, I pinged a boggus destination. This triggered the bri interface on router B. Here is the output of the "debug dialer events" from Router A. You can see that router A (for no apparent reason) is trying to call router B (even though it is router B who initiated the call.) Of course t

RE: ISDN -- challenge! [7:46496]

2002-06-14 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
No I am not running any routing protocol! Here are my configs: isdn1 (router A) isdn1#show run Building configuration... Current configuration : 1166 bytes ! version 12.2 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname isdn1 ! enable secr

RE: ISDN -- challenge! [7:46496]

2002-06-14 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
"You have default routes pointed towards one another. You ping an address that doesn't exist on either router. The first sends it off to the second. The second doesn't know what to do with it so sends it on to its default which is the first." I do agree with your statements ... However, what is t

Re: ISDN -- challenge! [7:46496]

2002-06-14 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Gaz, you are going to have to educate me on cultural issues ... What is wrong with those numbers ? (ip host isdn2 2065 1.1.1.1) Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46631&t=46496 -- FAQ, list archives,

Re: ISDN -- challenge! [7:46496]

2002-06-14 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Sorry Gaz, I did not mean to spoil to the suspense. I thought you meant the humbers 2065 1.1.1.1 were unlucky numbers. Something like :) That is why I asked you to explain if there was any cultural issues with my numbers ... Anyway,I am redoing the exercise right now with Fast Ethenernet In

Re: ISDN -- challenge! [7:46496]

2002-06-14 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Ok, here are the result of my tests (cummulative) 1) I gave the loopbacks unique IP addresses and tested result: no change 2) I assigned isdn1 f0/0 to vlan11 and isdn f0/0 to vlan12 on isdn1 f0/0 ip address was 192.168.10.1/24 on isdn2 f0/0 ip address was 192.168.20.1/24 I left the default

RE: 5-4-3 rule segment definition for 10BaseT [7:46439]

2002-06-14 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Well here is a start: the 5-4-3 rule reffers to 5 segments 4 repeaters 3 populated segments Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46667&t=46439 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www

  1   2   >