I just got the advertisement from Global Knowledge, sounds like a good
time.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
John Chang
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Training [7:16684]
Ultimate Hacking
New Yor
QIP is solid in comparison to the competition (NetID comes to mind with
shreaks of terror). If you are interested in QIP, let me know and I will be
glad to get you in touch with someone in our VitalSuite Practice. They
manage that portfolio as well.
Later,
Will
-Original Message-
From
Paul is absolutely correct. We are partners with ISS and its still a costly
piece of software, however its a brilliantly coded one~!
Will
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Paul Borghese
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2001 2:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROT
I would say that less than 7% was devoted to BGP when I took it. Halabi's
book is excellent and if memory serves me correctly our own Mr.Howard
Berkowitz was going to be writing a new BGP book, Howard is that still in
the works?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL P
Check out cache flow, Foundry Networks works alot with them on bid Web
deals; good products!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 11:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Web cachingBig que
Each Vlan can accomadate 254 with each switch accomadating a max of 256
devices...its was on my Switching exam todayI passed ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Chris Haller
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 6:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Su
I recommnend also reading Network Intrusion Detection, An Analysts Handbook
by Stephen Northcutt and Judy Novak as well. Good Stuff! Sorry, its off
topic though. Paul, is there any possibility of starting a security list?
regards,
Will
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mail
Bryan is correct. Also there is the issue of cost. Many organizations are
not willing to spend a great deal on a router when they can get the same
functionality in switch.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Bryan In Richmond
Sent: Wednesday
Yeah the Enterasys Dragon Products (formerly Cabletron), are very good.
Have not worked with the Cisco IDS though.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
lawrence sculark
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 2:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Int
yeah Carl, its www.booksonline.com/telecommunications
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
MIRSKY Carl
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 2:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Book club [7:6811]
A while back there was information posed on a b
TECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Russ Kreigh
> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 4:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Intrusion Detection [7:6494]
>
>
> Snort is also a decent one for the price (free)
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
&g
Check out Intrusion.com
They make some truly great products
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Mel Chandler PMI
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 2:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Intrusion Detection [7:6494]
Has any had the opportunity t
LOL, Chuck has not lost his sense of humor!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Chuck Larrieu
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 4:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Windows 2000 Server Architechture/ Data Organization
[7:5343]
I thought a pee
No, you do not need the Professional level certs before taking the CCIE
written. You don't even need the CCNA.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Daniel Lafraia
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 1:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ccie writt
www.cisco.com
Check out the products and applicable cards.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Rashid Lohiya
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 1:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Can I use FE in 2610 [7:5040]
I have been told by a friend that
Its the same certification Marshal, with the only difference being that one
option allows you to test on three different topics as opposed to taking
those tests separately. Generally, its been my experience that employers
will not care how you got the CCNP only that you got it.
-Original Mes
Kevin,
I saw those CBE/CBI certs you tried sneaking in there, were you in the
Marine Corps? Cause thats the only time that I have ever seen anyone with
those certs.
Cheers,
Will Gragido
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Kevin Wigle
Sent:
Way to go Rodger! Congratulations!!!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
EA Louie
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 1:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: And this, too, shall pass... [7:4207]
heartiest congratulations, Roger
-e-
- Origi
dude, have you checked the joblist?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 4:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: WAN Job in the Metro Detroit area [7:3683]
I am looking for a WAN job in the Detroit
Caroll's right, you can't BS that lab!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Carroll Kong
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 3:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Passed CCIE Written but NOT doing lab [7:3568]
At 01:27 PM 5/8/01 -0400, Chris Hal
I suggest purchasing the ISS Network and Internet Scanner. They are awesome
products!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Robert Nelson-Cox
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 2:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Just been Hacked! [7:3452]
I think that most people just take the exams in that order: CCNA first then
the CCDA. I know thats what I did when I took them, it didn't cross my mind
to do it in an other way.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Kevin Wigle
Sent: Sunday, Ma
I am detecting a lot of hostility here...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Larry Osei-Kwaku
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2001 5:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Stop Sending me mails this is my fourth mail. [7:3280]
You Fool
Yeah, the CCDA is good for that; but the payoff is in the case studies
because it forces you to approach things from a different perspective
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Traceroute
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 1:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECT
Is that the one in Chicago John? I have heard about them, could you forward
me a link or the information that you have.
Thanks,
WG
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
John Chang
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 7:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj
Caspian Systems??? Can you elaborate a little?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 6:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT:There is always a New Kid on the Block (CIsco) [7:2613]
The new
7;s posterior about their employees when
times were bad. Rather, all the job candidates will flock to the 'good-guy'
companies where they know they will be taken care of, whether times are good
or bad. Call it corporate Karma.
But, it's probably a pipe dream.
""Willi
Cisco is not the only company doing it, Lucent is as is Nortel and many
others. Right now, its just a case of corporations re-evaluating their
costs vs their revenues. Its nothing personal(in most cases I would
imagine).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hey, Maria you are not supposed to advertise on this board. Paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Maria Stevens
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 4:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Five (5) Product Give Away - No Conditions! [7:2407]
Russ,
I started out at age 20 working as a data communications/security specialist
in USMC. Trust me age has nothing to with it. I have met people who are
brilliant at all ages and the opposite can be said as well. I wouldn't
worry too much about your age, nor would I wear it on your sleeve li
It means that the logging messages are not being displayed to the console
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
beth shriver
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 9:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: what does " no logging console" mean? [7:1708]
I
Priscilla,
I know that Appletalk is still being referenced in most Support Exam Study
Guides that are currently in circulation. Matt Luallen's Exam Cram Study
Guide references it on pages 117-123. Hope that helps, I plan on taking the
exam either Sunday or Monday of next week.
Toodles,
Will
John,
I got both your emails, sorry that I did not respond to you right away.
Listen, when you are ready, let me know. Like I said before, we are always
looking for talent.
Later,
Will
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
John Neiberger
Sen
Once again, it totally depends on the subject matter being studied.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Liang Mark J Civ AFRL/PROI
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 1:11 PM
To: 'B J'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX
LOL.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Drew Simonis
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 1:05 PM
To: B J
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX
B J wrote:
>
> The CCNA is far harder than any test one will encounter w
Of course it is. See the certification section on Cisco's web page.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
anil.philip
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 2:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Andrew Larkins; Audio Kisei
Subject: Pre requisite for CCDP
H
I think that you may be mistaking complexity with lack of clarity regarding
the questions/tests of which you speak. I have sat for both Cisco and
Microsoft exams and have found that most of the time Microsoft appears to be
more difficult when in actuallity they are not more difficult; only poorly
I found the following link that allude to it:
http://www.worldcom.com/about_the_company/cerfs_up/presentations/nstac/tsld0
13.phtml
It doesn't explain what it is, but it does mention it ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
jap_e
Sent: Wed
Well said!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Liang Mark J Civ AFRL/PROI
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 10:01 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX
Bravo!
-Origi
Its not recommended to use a router alone as a firewall device. In many
security architectures you will find routers (aka Screening Routers),
running access-lists in conjunction with a true firewall solution that will
be using some sort of ruleset to process incoming traffic. This may differ
in
Are you looking for a FR simulator or a WAN simulator? There is an awesome
product out on the market by a company named Shunra called the 'Storm' and
the 'Cloud'. You can manipulate network latency, standard deviation, packet
loss etc. in a variety of forms. Whats really cool is that it integra
I agree with Chris on this one,
I am about as big of a Cisco freak as you will find out there, but its not
as though Cisco has been cannonized by the Church and set above this sort of
carnal behavior, they are business and at times, though we may not always
like to admit it, fall into the same tr
>From what I have been told by people who that I know at a few of the
carriers, the Avici boxes are supposed to be extremely robust boxes.
Powerhouses if you will that come with price tag to match.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Christoph
It depends on what you mean by 'better'.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
cslx
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 5:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: juniper and cisco
it is said that the core technology of juniper is better than cisco no
I agree with Kent,
Unless there has been an official non-biased bake off, its really hard to
say which product can out perform the other.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 6:37 PM
To: [EM
heheheheyou might get a few raised eyebrows in your classes for that
one!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Bradley J. Wilson
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2001 5:01 AM
To: cisco
Subject: Re: LOL
I find myself sitting here wondering if
There are several good choices for accomplishing load testing. You can use
a Sniffer or Etherpeek to generate packets, as well as NetXray. You can
also use tools such as those that accomplish ping floods.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
R
I like SnifferPro, AGnets Etherpeek and Tokenpeek as well.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Gary Witherspoon
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 4:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: protocol analyzers
Anybody have a good recomendation of a
I have that little black book, its great! Caslow's latest addition is
outstanding as well IMHO
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
John Chang
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 10:51 AM
To: Jim Dixon; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Book Recomme
co routers
>>
>>
>>This is all well and good for the big time players, ISPs, big corps
>>yadda yadda yadda, and companies with cash to burn like so much old toilet
>>paper. The Small and Midsized Business market (SMB) almost always can
>>accomplish what they want wi
market (SMB) almost always can
accomplish what they want with free Unix or Linux for layer 3 and
cheap stackable switches with or without 802.1q support.
So my obligatory cisco alternative:
www.zebra.org
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 04:00:36PM -0600, William E. Gragido wrote:
>There ServerIronXL Layer
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 3:41 PM
To: 'Brant Stevens'; 'William E. Gragido'; 'Howard C. Berkowitz';
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: alternative to Cisco routers
Foundry prices are killer and the performance is top notch.
We're plan
Probably sent form anon mailer
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Rodgers Moore
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 3:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: alternative to Cisco routers
Am I the only one who finds this funny? I mean, i
]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 3:28 PM
To: William E. Gragido; 'Howard C. Berkowitz'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: alternative to Cisco routers
Not to mention Foundry...
Brant I. Stevens
Internetwork Solutions Engineer
Thrupoint, Inc.
545 Fifth Avenue, 14th Floor
New York, NY. 100
Riding on the coat tails of Howard's comments, there are also other players
out there like Lucent(home of the Nexibit N64000 Terabit Switch Router and
the Ascend product lines), Avici, Charlette's Web, Nortel etc., that offer
carrier grade solutions.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTE
I would say to a certain extent you are right with the possible exception
being BGPv4. To me, the test was challenging but not that difficult,
however some of the questions that I got on BGPv4 did not reflect the
materials that I studied regarding the protocol. I have since acquired
Halabi's sec
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > Buri, Heather H
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 5:55 PM
> > To: 'William E. Gragido'; 'AndyD'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Subject: R
Buri, Heather H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 10:55 AM
To: 'William E. Gragido'; 'AndyD'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: BSCN??
For this exam, would you recommend that the explanation of BGP provided in
the BSCN books is sufficient or
No IS-IS, but you must know OSPF configs, EIGRP and BGPv4 like its cool
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
AndyD
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 10:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BSCN??
Has anybody out there taken the BSCN test?? How w
Not for quite some time as it only became the defacto standard July 31,
2000. I would say that you have plenty of time.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Terry
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 9:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CCNA 2.0
Dude, you are gonna open up an all too traversed can of worms with this
one...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Meow
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 7:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Waants to Sell CCPREP.com password
wwwant to sell
Is that who they are going after? Certification Zone? I have been the
site, and I have not seen anything that really compromises the NDA, in fact,
most the papers that are there seem like interpretations of the cisco.com
site. That's a shame. Next it will be Coriolis and Sybex!
-Original
Pradeep, you are about as subtle as a friggin heart attack. Could you
possibly be more cutting in your tone and/or comments?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Pradeep Kumar
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2001 5:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EM
Well, for what its worth, I took and passed BSCN on Wednesday of this week
and am taking Switching next followed by Support and wrapping things up with
Remote Access.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Brian Ledbetter
Sent: Friday, January 26
Oz has not posted on here in a LONG time man, I thought I was the only who
remembered.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Steve H
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 11:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 3 down, 1 to go...(passed BCRAN)
In
Not to mention the fact that its poor form to operate that way on a public,
peer driven forum and that since we are colleagues by virtue of our trade,
it leaves much to be desired in regards to wanting to ever work with you.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
I have already ordered Caslow's 2nd edition, and can't wait to get it!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Arthur Stewart
Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2001 10:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CCIE reading: TCP/IP by Doyle Vol.1 or 2
F
Hey, now, lets keep everything copasetic shall we?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Saif
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 2:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Business Proposal for CCIE lab:kick him
Indian Jerk
Pradeep Kumar wrote:
Could the same effect be gained from a protein supplement? I will try it
for my next exam on Sunday and report the results!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Stuart Laubstein
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 10:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
S
Looks pretty standard to me as well. Internal 10.x.x.x with a
class C subnet.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Christopher Larson
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 8:04 AM
To: 'Natasha'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: wrong subnet
I don'
I wrote a response to this original thread and I am not sure that it was
posted, but I will summarize by saying that these types of discussions
should be taken off line or on another list. Why you may ask? Well, here
is what I think: If you read Paul's terms page, advocating piracy is not
allow
Lets start another list dedicated to ethics shall we? These
arguements(regardless of how valid they are), should be confined to a
separate list. Paul, what do you think? It should be known by now that the
list in and of itself does not advocate piracy, however that does not
guarantee that indiv
Jeongwoo, All of the tea in China won't help someone who is only paper
certified. I feel that you should do what all people must do at times when
an intense decision looms on the horizon; re-evaluate your situation.
Here's where I am going with that: Ok, fine you have your CCNP, how much
experie
Check out Fatkid.com, they have pretty descent virtual racks and scenarios
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
±èÈï¼ö
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 7:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CCIE LAB Practice
Hi all
I have completed the CCN
Welcome aboard, are you a CCNA?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
netho
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 7:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: want to find some friends participating CCNP exam
hi, everyone. I am a newcomer for this group.
The 700 is an ISDN non IOS compatable router.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Taylor, Don
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 4:02 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 700seriesInfo ISBN#s
700 Switch? I don't know of a
I know of one CCIE who did it in with only two years experience and and
about 6 months of study after obtaining the CCNP/CCDP
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Daniel Cotts
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 10:41 AM
To: 'Henry D'; [EMAIL PRO
Even more importantly Park, you need to have the real life experience to
back up the cert.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
chris fong
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 9:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Disappointed with ccnp!!
I h
Agreed. Apple has never truly received the credit that they deserve for
most of their offerings. Simplicity and functionality are attributes that
help make Apple who they are, and their innovative spirit did spark
inspiration in the PC world.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [
Thats out of print? Too bad, Kent Hundley and Gil Held are favorites of
mine as well. Their IOS IP Field Guide is also a handy little book to have
around.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Chuck Larrieu
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2001 8:40
LOL, I usually don't advocate non-technical discussions on this board(I
think I need to lighten up), but this is TOO funny!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Natasha
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2001 11:49 PM
To: CCIE Group study list
Subject
And so does ospf ;-)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Paul Borghese
> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 9:13 PM
> To: Sammi; Cisco
> Subject: Re: Please don't lie on resumes
>
>
> Read:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisi
Hey thanks! I missed that LOL
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Martin-Guy Richard
> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 12:46 PM
> To: William E Gragido
> Cc: Pieter Jordaan; 'Jeff Lodwick'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You are correct George!
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> George Zhang
> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 9:27 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: RIP v1 or RIP v2?
>
>
> I think it's RIP v1 by default. To enable RIP v2, you nee
What about CCDAs?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Pieter Jordaan
> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 12:41 AM
> To: 'Jeff Lodwick'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Total number of CCNP's worldwide?
>
>
> Check this out
>
> BREAKDO
Alright, now, Dale is way more blunt than I was the other day, comence with
da flaming! LOL
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Dale Holmes
> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 11:40 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject
Netgun makes the same type of claim, how do you verify that? Beats me,
seems like you would have to poll all those who went through the course and
then took the test. I am not sure if Mentors or NetGun does that for that
matter.
Will
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mail
More importantly than that, do you have ANY experience with NOS(Unix, NT,
NetWare, Banyon), that you can leverage in your studies? Meaning this, if
you have worked with say, NetWare for fours years, you should already be
familiar to a certain degree the OSI model, and basic internetworking etc.
I
OTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> derek lewinson
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 7:41 PM
> To: William E Gragido
> Cc: cisco@groupstudy. com
> Subject: RE: Sniffer Pro 3.5
>
>
> you did mean to be rude and you were rude and you were unhelpful.
> "Why on god's green e
our serve
Will
> -Original Message-
> From: Winchester, Derek S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 3:21 PM
> To: 'William E Gragido'; Charles Nunie; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Sniffer Pro 3.5
>
>
> This kind of comment
I don't mean to be rude man, but why on God's green earth would you buy a
product like Sniffer Pro without the slightest friggin inclination as to
what it does?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Charles Nunie
> Sent: Friday, October 20
Because when they said so thats why >;-('
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Andy Xing
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 2:59 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Why 53-bytes for a cell?
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> _
Jeffs right, Check your WINS settings ;-<
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Jeff Lodwick
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 3:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Network neighborhood
>
>
> Assuming file and print sharing is enabl
The UN are Facists {off soapbox}
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> ElephantChild
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 3:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Employment Opportunity
>
>
> On Wed, 18 Oct 2
Lets not forget that Partners receive benes for their Associate level people
as well Kevin ;-)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Kevin Wigle
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 1:51 PM
> To: Terrence Garrison; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL
I would when I took it, I think I went for fifty minutes, and felt as though
I rushed a little on the way. Those case studies are tedious yet necessary.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Brad Nixon
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000
I think I am noticing that CCNA, CCNP and CCIE
> are of less and less importance because there
> is such a short supply of people,
I am sorry Terrence, but I would suggest you do your homework on this one,
many employers won't even talk to you without those certs.
employers no better than to a
Can you guys take this to dentl list?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> CCNP_CCDP
> Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2000 8:52 PM
> To: adam lee
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Practicing Dentist at 21 years old
>
>
> Here's anothe
Not that I am aware, but I do know someone with two who is working on his
third.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Mohammed Hakim
> Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2000 5:09 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: WHIZZ KIDS WHO HAVE THE
I took the class and thought it was very good!
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Dave M.
> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 3:09 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Anyone's comments on BCSN class?
>
>
> To all those that have attend
1 - 100 of 227 matches
Mail list logo
