??? Dumb Consultant ??? - Please Help [7:75213]

Hello all, I need some folks with hopefully a CCIE to answer this question. If there is an un subnetted class A, and there are 25 or users on the network. would the fact that the network is unsubnetted cause a large load of network traffic? here is the reason and layout. Our company uses

Re: Studying Switching [7:75030]

No sorry I know that peom, no spanning in there at all. LoL Steve Tom Lisa wrote: > Priscilla, > > Didn't Radia write a poem that starts something like > "I have never seen a tree as lovely as a spanning tree?" > > BTW, is it still possible to get a "free" copy of 802.1s & w. > I looked on the

Re: Please Help - CIDR - How the bits work [7:75050]

t;> >> >>Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA >>30338 >>Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 >> >> >>NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary >>information which >>may be legally

Re: Please Help - CIDR - How the bits work What I figured out [7:75087]

>>may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named >>recipient(s). >>If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the >>email, please >>notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not >>the named >>recipient, you are not

IP Subnet calc. [7:75085]

Any one know a good free subnet calc. After realizing how many break downs, and how many subnetworks you would have to figure for CIDR, I would rather not do it with pan and paper. Free is good, for the calc. cost. Steve Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=750

Re: Please Help - CIDR - How the bits work What I figured out [7:75086]

is intended only for the named >>recipient(s). >>If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the >>email, please >>notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not >>the named >>recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, &

Good network monitor prog. ??? [7:75081]

Any one know of a good network monitor prog.? It doesn't have to be free but not to expensive. My budget is nill. Any recomendations? Thanks, Steve Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75081&t=75081 -- **Please sup

CIDR - I was dumb - thanks every one [7:75079]

I think I was over looking something very simple. CLASS-LESS! If I understand things correctly. If I have 10 bits for my host section I have a total of 1024 hosts. What I was stuck on is liner break down dividing subnets in factors of 2. But ( here was my mistake ) by powers of 2, I'm not s

Please Help - CIDR - How the bits work [7:75050]

I just started my routing class for my CCNP. We are covering CIDR. The book is VEERY vague on how the bit patterns break down and are used. This was a problem posed in one of my CCNP labs I have network number 192.168.24.0 / 22 from this I need networks with 400 hosts 200 hosts 50 hos

Cisco Vs. Low cost switches -Whats the Diff ? [7:74987]

Ok, So I know there is a big difference in the cost and performance of Cisco (even lower end models) and let say a netgear switch. But where do the difference lay? I know that there are memory issues and back plain differences in these 2 classes of switches. But how do I find out what a

??? Cisco Express Forwarding ??? [7:74794]

Another question, in CEF is the whole routing table held in a cache? If so what is the diffrence between this and the routing table held in RAM? Is the cache faster than the regular RAM in the router? Thanks, Steve Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=74794&t

??? Layer 2 routing ??? [7:74788]

Ok all I have a question on this subject. I know routing takes place at the network layer, and switching takes place at the data link layer because it works based on physical addresses. So how do we get route switching? I've just started my CCNP and we were learning about different cache met

Point to Point for a 26xx and a Watchguard SOHO [7:74719]

Hello all, I was wondering if any one has configured a Cisco and a Watchguard SOHO in Point to Point configuration to save on IP public IP addresses? Here is my situation. I have 1 router with 2 FE interfaces. There are 2 companies sharing a T1 line in a single building. One company wa

2514 router [7:74592]

anyone can help with a configuration for dsl to a 2514? I just got the router and having a hell of time with it. thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=74592&t=74592 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing

Off topic - MCSE study groups [7:74112]

Hay, Any one know of some good MCP or MCSE study groups? If so can let me know the news server? Thanks all, Steve Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=74112&t=74112 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing fr

Re: CCNP >> MCSE >> hands on [7:73284]

you need an account on the 2k box with the cumputer name of the win 9x box. Then if you try to access the box it should ask you for a password. Simply enter the one you set and your good to go. Oh also do you have the client for MS networks installed Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi

Example of reflexive access list with VPN access [7:73269]

|Firewall 1| 12.40.100.131 (Needs VPN port passed through) \ \ \ |Firewall 2| 12.40.100.132 (NO VPN ACCESS) All users need the above services. Thanks for all your help, Steven - CCNA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/fo

Microsoft VPN through a router [7:72824]

I was wondering what ports I would need to have open for a Microsoft VPN connection on my router. If I have done my home work correctly I think IPSec port: 50 L2TP port : 1701 PPTP port : 1723 Are these all TCP, UDP??? I don't really have a full understanding of how the protocal and port pr

Microsoft VPN through a router [7:72824]

I was wondering what ports I would need to have open for a Microsoft VPN connection on my router. If I have done my home work correctly I think IPSec port: 50 L2TP port : 1701 PPTP port : 1723 Are these all TCP, UDP??? I don't really have a full understanding of how the protocal and port pr

Re: Upgrade license [7:70919]

I believe it's just a new activation key. Copied from Cisco's website: There are a couple of reasons that you may need to upgrade the activation key on your PIX. a.. Your PIX does not currently have VPN-DES or VPN-3DES encryption enabled. Note: VPN-DES encryption must be enabled for you to m

Re: Networkers, pt. 2 [7:70768]

I'll be there. Looking forward to it. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""Mossburg, Geoff (MAN-Corporate)"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I know Robert McCallum already asked this, but who is going to Networkers in > Orlando next week? Any cool GroupStudy router config parties gonna happen?

Re: VPN client can connect but no traffic can pass [7:70084]

Hey David and Group I have done as what you had asked me to change but no luck. Still no traffic can pass thru although it can connect. My new config is at the end of the mail. Anyone have idea why?? I really feel strange, as my username and password can be authenticated by my W2K radius serv

RE: VPN client can connect but no traffic can pass [7:70084]

crypto ipsec sa to see what connections are up. HTH Let the list know when you are successful. -Original Message----- From: Steven shinnick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:23 PM To: Daniel Cotts; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: VPN client can connect but no traffic ca

Remote VPN config cause PIX-PIX link hang!! [7:70293]

know when you are successful. -Original Message- From: Steven shinnick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:23 PM To: Daniel Cotts; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: VPN client can connect but no traffic can pass [7:70084] Hey.. Daniel and Study Group I follow the in

RE: VPN client can connect but no traffic can pass [7:70084]

nt. There is a more elegant way to do this last step. Not sure which version allows it. There are several books on PIX configuration available. "Cisco Secure PIX Firewalls" by Chapman and Fox, Cisco Press, ISBN 1587050358 "Cisco PIX Firewalls" by Richard Deal, Osborne McGraw Hill

VPN client can connect but no traffic can pass [7:70084]

I had installed a VPN client in home PC to connect to PIX in my company. It can connect and get authenticated and login. But I can't ping and talk to any PCs in my company. why?? I specify the IPPOOLS in my PIX config. It means my VPN client will get these IP right? But how about subnet mask?

Re: hacking challenge [7:66720]

Depending on the servers you could do it in 5 min. There is an annonamys account that runs over netbios in the 130's port area. If there isn't a firewall in place to filer this port you can use the "net use" command and have access to the box. After this you can download the backup copy of t

Re: Speed Duplex Talk again [7:66402]

Ok seeing as how were talking about duplex mismatches. I have one workstation on my LAN that is clearly a dog when it comes to network traffic. I have set it to all different duplex settings and speeds, hoping to notice a change. How would I detect if there was a speed type mis-match? I'm n

Re: DS3 bandwidth issues [7:65790]

Wow Thank you sooo much. This is the best explanation of T-carrier Vs. Dx-Carrier I've ever read. I work in the IT field for some time, but not to much in the telco side and I could never really find what the difference was. THANKS A TON Steve Message Posted at: http://www.groupstud

Re: CCIE [7:65426]

Wow, I am so much more motivated to get my CCIE now. ahaha, that was hilarious. Steve Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65444&t=65426 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/lis

Re: is 10baseT dead? [7:65263]

). I think it is far better to have the bandwidth ready and available then to fall short. That's just my opinion on the humble, Steven Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65357&t=65263 -- FAQ,

Re: is 10baseT dead? [7:65077]

and if they can afford it so be it. Look at the situation this way at least if your going for over kill the network will perform well, that is better than underselling and then having your clients be upset because they are limited in the future. But hay that's just my 2 cents. Take it with

Re: PRI [7:64999]

If I remember correctly there are 64 channels in a PRI ISDN. I could be wrong it was one of things I memorized for my CCNA. Steve Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65055&t=64999 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscrip

??? CCS ??? [7:65056]

Why can I not access some of the links people are posting point to Cisco's web site. It asks for a CCS login? Can any one get one and how would I go about it? Thanks, Steve Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65056&t=65056 --

EtherChannel - WOW Thats great [7:64940]

That's for all the info on Ether channel. What a wonderful idea. Is Ether channel hard to set up? I don't have the 100 Mb routers to try this at home or even 2 100Mbs switches. Does any one have a sample config file form a router or switch that uses it? Thanks again all you are all great (

??? 2 Default Gateways ??? [7:64913]

load balancing with routing protocols, but it seems to me that if you were on a stub, why would you want to run a routing protocol? I'm interested in this because of a post a while back. Any info would be helpful. Thanks, Steven Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.

Security News Groups [7:64907]

Hello all, I saw a post a little bit ago about security news groups. I'll ask again because I also have been looking for one. Any one know of a good security news group? If so please share. Steve Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64907&t=64907 --

??? Etherchannel ??? [7:64900]

Ok please don't be annoyed I have another vocab question. I know what Ethernet is and I'm fairly sure fiberchannel is basically some sort of fiber line. What is Ether channel? And where is it commonly used. Any one have a good link? Thanks, Steve Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy

??? MPLS ??? [7:64898]

Sorry for such a newbe question. But what is MPLS? And what is it? Any one have a link they can point me too? Just trying to learn more. Thanks, Steve Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64898&t=64898 -- FAQ, list

OSPF into RIP redistribution [7:64502]

First I'm sorry if this has been asked before, but I'm just looking for a general overview and maybe a few good links. I've been told that there are some issues with RIP and OSPF redistribution. If so what are they and why. Thanks, Steve Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/r

Re: Multiple WAN Connections to a Network [7:64469]

Terry, I'm not totally sure what you are doing with your setup. Are you web hosting and you have the 2 connections up for fault tolerance? or some other reason. Unless I am mistaken is you are running between to AS's on the net you need to use BGP. ( Please all correct me if I'm wrong,

Re: OSPF attempting to form adjacencies with non-DR/BDR [7:64468]

Kelly, I'm going to take a stab at this because I JUST started working with OSPF in my lab at home. However, in the Cisco doc.s they were saying it's good practice to set your priority level to zero. Actually here is the paragraph. "OSPF routers all have the same priority value by default

??? collapsed backbone ??? [7:64467]

Hello all, in a recent post I saw the term "collapsed backbone". I know that the network backbone is usually a high speed connection that a server farm sits on, and could even extend out to your IFD's. However I'm fuzzy on the term collapsed backbone. What dose this imply. Thank you all,

Re: Cisco 2501 DC Power adaptors ? [7:64300]

I just had this prob. I got a router for my home lab that had DC power. Actually I just swapped an AC power supply from the same series router that I had into the one I wanted to use and it works just fine. Hope that helps, also I'm sure you can find them on e-bay. Steve Message Posted

routername(boot) ??? [7:64188]

I have recently received some routers for a home lab. When I boot one it displays the following. routername(boot)> what is this "(boot)" mean and how do I get ride of it? I've worked on routers before and never seen this. Thanks in advance. Steve Message Posted at: http://www.grou

Wildcard Masking on the BSIN Exam [7:63887]

Any one know if they cover wild card masking in depth on the BSIN Exam? Thanks, Steve Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63887&t=63887 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisc

??? IS-IS ??? [7:63875]

Hello All, I'm wondering was IS-IS is. No pun intended. I'm assuming it's a routing protocol? I've gone through Cisco, CCNA acad. and have my CCNA and I've even started going over Semester 5 for the CCNP, but IS-IS is no where to be found... Is this a new protocol? Or does someone know

The CCNP BSIN ( I Think Exam ) [7:63749]

I have been readibng through the boards and from what I've seen the new CCNP Routing exam seems to be a bear. This is the next test I am studying for. Any one out there that have passed the test, that can give me a generally study out line? Also what books or test prep did you use. You guys

Re: Telnet Hole [7:63627]

Larry, Thank you for your reply, however what I was speaking of did not involve SSL. I know this may seem strange I know I am not mistaking. I checked with my Cisco instructor and he also remembered the exploit. The instructor even verified the passwords and config on the router. I am ass

Where to Start for CCNP [7:63630]

I recently passed my CCNA, and I am interested in starting on my CCNP. I am taking classes at a local college that offers 10 week classes based around each of the 4 tests. Basically the CCNP path lasts 40 weeks. I start in the fall and I wanted to get a jump start on my learning as I have bee

Telnet Hole [7:63627]

ow is this attack performed Thank you, Steven Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63627&t=63627 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report m

Re: Site to Site VPN Monitering on PIX [7:62676]

CiscoWorks VMS 2.1 -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""Curious"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have setup Site to Site VPN between our corporate PIX 515 and our > developers PIX 501, i want to moniter the VPN traffic of these Site to Site > VPN connections. > Please t

Route Summarization [7:62347]

continuous networks. Is this correct, or am I missing something? Thank you all, Steven Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62347&t=62347 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.

Re: fragmentation question [7:60643]

Thanks! I was just curious. What about L2 headers in Frame Relay Fragmentation (frf.12)? ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Steven A. Ridder wrote: > > > > Does anyone know if a packet is fr

Re: VoIP from behind PIX [7:60859]

> At 12:03 AM + 1/13/03, Steven A. Ridder wrote: > >I agree with Matt. The PIX 515 introduces jitter. Not sure what the Cisco > >IPT Safe document is talking about. > > This may be a rather obscure point, but if a cryptographic device > takes different amounts of time to en

Re: fragmentation question [7:60643]

Does anyone know if a packet is fragmented, that the specific values in a field are replicated across all headers of the fragmented packets, or just the first one? Meaning, if I have a packet that has IP Prec 5, and a router along the way has to fragment the packet, would it be so kind as to put I

Re: VoIP from behind PIX [7:60859]

I agree with Matt. The PIX 515 introduces jitter. Not sure what the Cisco IPT Safe document is talking about. ""Matt Hill"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Good luck.. > > However you will get latency and jitter issues during the time the PIXs > encrypt/decrypt t

RE: Cisco IP Telephony Certification.... [7:59274]

Hi Juan, Munit & Binh, Appreciate very much for the information. Merry Christmas to all. With regards Steven Quek HP Network Ser vices Hewlett Packard Singapore Sales (Pte.) Ltd. DID: 65-6374 9369 Mobile: 65-9797 4526 -Original Message- From: Juan Blanco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE

RE: Cisco IP Telephony Certification.... [7:59274]

Hi, So far I have not heard any response, appreciate greatly if someone can share some lights on this topic. Thank you.. With regards Steven Quek HP Network Ser vices Hewlett Packard Singapore Sales (Pte.) Ltd. DID: 65-6374 9369 Mobile: 65-9797 4526 -Original Message- From: Quek

Cisco IP Telephony Certification.... [7:59274]

ing QoS For Enterprise Network". These 2 tests you must passed to get Specialized. Hopefully you can let me know the passing marks and time needed for the tests. Appreciate anyone out there can provide me other valuable information so that I can work on it. Thanks again & have a Merry Chris

Re: callmanager 3.3 [7:59160]

Supposedly by end of the month. Docs and stuff are slowly trickling out, but noting good yet. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""supernet"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Several months ago, Cisco TAC told me that CallManager 3.3 would be > released in Nov. this year.

Re: AW: Port Security on 3550 based on given MAC-Addre [7:58591]

You are correct. I read it too quickly. ""William Lijewski"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello, > > The default for the maximum number of mac-addresses is one, and the default > violation is shutdown. > > Bill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/

Re: Enterprise technologies [7:58493]

I'd focus on Avvid technologies, centraly managed security and storage solutions across nation-wide networks and public Internet (Cisco Works/ACS), and on-line collaboration tools using open standards like LDAP, X.509, h.323/SIP, etc. That is where Enterprises are moving. ""Priscilla Oppenheimer

Re: is there anyone migrating isdn backup to dsl b [7:58568]

I say DSL has no "multi-service" (or very limited) capabilities. There isn't much in terms of QoS, LFI or other voice/video tools. Plus there is no QoS across the DSL network (if over Internet) and no standard nation-wide (no National provider). If you say, there is no voice going across network

Re: Off Topic - Missed it by that much - CCIE Lab report [7:58587]

was your problem split horizon? ""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > In the words of the esteemed Maxwell Smart, missed it by that much. > > Good test. Liked it a lot. Can't say much about the content, obviously. > > The 3550's were there

Re: Last Minute Thought - OSPF authentication issue? [7:58352]

Are you sure you specified the area under ospf for authenticaton? -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > check this out. > > R10 > -- > Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface > 222.2

Re: Port Security on 3550 based on given MAC-Address and [7:58331]

""MK"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Because there must be a way, and I was asked about it in our > Company. I know there is some secret behind ! > > -Urspr|ngliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto

Re: Port Security on 3550 based on given MAC-Address and [7:58332]

uot;" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Because there must be a way, and I was asked about it in our > Company. I know there is some secret behind ! > > -Urspr|ngliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Re: Port Security on 3550 based on given MAC-Address and [7:58326]

Don't worry about the IP address. The command you had was correct. Why do you ask? -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""MK"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > How can I configure PortSecurity based on MAc-Address and > IP-Address. I only know about "switchport port-se

Re: Multicast & QOS Book .....Any Good?? [7:58137]

I heard from Wendel Odom himself that he is coming out with a Cisco-press QoS book for the Exam, so I'd wait for that. I thought I heard December. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""dre"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > ""Cisco Nuts"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: VoIP Testing :MOS Vs PQSM [7:58061]

Just use the MOS charts alread yout there and not worry about it. Why reinvent the wheel? -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""neil K."" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Guys, > > VoIP Testing, do you go by MOS or PQSM. I mean when testing VoIP will > perform on a network

Re: Multicast Traffic Question [7:57932]

ping a multicast address. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""H"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have just started to study for Multicast, and I am wondering whether there > is any simulator / programs that can simulate Multicast traffic. Also, can > I use a Cisco rou

Re: Block MSN Messenger [7:57595]

no. don't waste your time. ""Ahed Naimi"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Dear All; > > Is there any way to block MSN Messenger by using the access-list statements > on an IOS Cisco router. > > Thanks All. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/rea

Re: Networkers download sessions [7:57587]

I lost it. Could you post it please? thanks Steve ""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Thanks. I have the information. > > > At 1:37 AM + 11/18/02, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: > >I confess to having download problems with a couple of recen

Re: OSPF adjacencies [7:57410]

It looks like the options in the packets do not march. Any way to get a sniffer on there to see what each is sending as options. It could also be a priority issue if the network is a broadcast/nbma network where neither is being elected a DR? Finally, could a checksum be bad? -- RFC 1149 Compl

Re: DQOS course and the CCIE Lab?? [7:57154]

I'd recommend knowing QoS in and out for the new lab format, as those are topics I think Cisco wants you to understand. As people have been saying for a while, they took out TR and IPX, but they have to replace it with something. ""Cisco Nuts"" wrote in message news:200211090308.DAA08923@;group

Re: The 1250$ question [7:56898]

I've been studying too hard, because I thought this was a REGEX question. ""Greg Nathan"" wrote in message news:200211051415.OAB12451@;groupstudy.com... > Hello fellow ciscoites > The question should include vat because that is is what cisco charge for the > lab, 1500$. > CCIE topics are well co

Re: Storage Area Networking [7:56857]

We in the Cisco world are just entering the SAN arena, but it isn't new technology. The only new thing will be iSCSI. My company is HP and EMC's largest reseller, so we have been doing this stuff for a while, but it's brand new to me. I have been picking everyone's brains the past few months to

Re: Cisco 3550 study materials and resources [7:56725]

I think they may focus on QoS stuff, but we'll see (I'll be prepared for everything) as I'm taking the new test this Friday. I know that they'll have 2 Cat 3550's from what they said in the summer, so I guess trunking, etherchannel and other things like you mention, VLAN tunneling may pop up as we

Re: DHCP (client) problem on Cisco 2514 [7:56573]

server x.x.x.x end YahooBB-Router# ""Steven"" wrote in message news:200210310447.EAA24091@;groupstudy.com... > Got this weird problem with a 2514 I use as a broadband router. I connect > the router to a DSL modem, but it doesn't get an IP address assigned. I got

DHCP (client) problem on Cisco 2514 [7:56573]

Got this weird problem with a 2514 I use as a broadband router. I connect the router to a DSL modem, but it doesn't get an IP address assigned. I got the correct IOS, and have "ip address dhcp" configured on the outside interface. When I connect a PC directly to the DSL modem, it gets an IP address

Re: Redistributing RIP into OSPF Lab practice [7:56313]

THe trick is to see if you can do it in 1 access-list statement. I think it can be done in 1. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""J B"" wrote in message news:200210252026.UAA12924@;groupstudy.com... > Thanks for the Help > > JB Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56364&

Re: Off topic - my first AVVID install [7:56305]

I agree that the phone deployment process is monkey work and could be subbed out for dirt cheap $$, just as long as the unions don't get their hands on it as they do in the real voice world. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in message news:200210251844.SAA20015@;grou

Re: Off topic - my first AVVID install [7:56305]

I'm gone for a week, and already I'm being attacked :) -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in message news:200210251844.SAA20015@;groupstudy.com... > Someone a lot smarter than I did the intelligent work - i.e. the call plan > and the server configuration. I was one of

Re: redistributing question... [7:56327]

without looking at the lab, try summary address at the (or all) ospf asbr's. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""Edward Sohn"" wrote in message news:200210260007.AAA12983@;groupstudy.com... > I'm working on Solie's "skynet" lab... > > If one router (R2) redistributes summarized EIGRP routes (from R5) in

RE: Jitter, RTD [7:56150]

Cisco has a product that does some reporting - it's QPM (QoS Policy Manager). Steve -Original Message- From: RJ [mailto:ronaldjcw@;yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Jitter, RTD [7:56150] Does anyone know there is any good tools (hardware

PAT And VPN [7:55942]

Hi all simple question. Is it possible to configure VPN on a router connecting to the internet using PAT? Presumably it would need some static mapping to enable the connections to be rooted to the router. has anyone managed this any info is appreciated thanks Steven Greeno Message Posted at

Re: Public Internet Access [7:55898]

as thinking along the lines > of policy routing. Is this the type of application it is intended for? I'm > still trying to find good information on it. > ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message > news:200210181920.TAA12300@;groupstudy.com... > > Not sure I unders

Re: Public Internet Access [7:55898]

Not sure I understand how you are running your network, but if you deny the lawyers VLAN from accessing the other VLAN's in your network, you should be all set. That way you only have one deny statement to add to each VLAN. I think what's throwing me is the 300 line access-list statement. There'

Re: Would this break the NDA [7:55799]

NO. ""Thomas Crowe"" wrote in message news:200210171509.PAA16135@;groupstudy.com... > I remember a while back I had the question of which terminal emulator is > being used for the CCIE lab. Well after taking the Lab (and yes I was > honored with an invitation to come back and try again one day

Re: Strange 6509 problems [7:55871]

what is the bootflash setting? ""Price, Jeffery (TIFPC)"" wrote in message news:200210181305.NAA26473@;groupstudy.com... > All, > > I am hoping that you can help shed some light on a problem we had early this > morning. We lost power to our data center and when the power came back on > our 3 co

Re: NTP server again !!!!!!!!!!!!!! [7:55836]

I think you have to be an NTP server, as I don't think a workstation can peer with you. wrote in message news:200210172226.WAA27043@;groupstudy.com... > Hi, > > I am trying to configure my NTP server on the cisco 7505 router. > > The configuration which I did is as follows: > > router#ntp master

Re: CallManager query to Win2k Active Directory [7:55789]

ONe place is the corporate directory, which is usually in the DC direcrotry. YOu get that by clicking on the directory button. Is that what you are talking about, or are you talking about personal directory, or the AD plugin, or the Exchange PAB plug-in? If it's what I think it is, the Active Dir

Re: run VoIP on a frame network at BIR instead of CIR rates [7:55833]

This was Cisco's old theory. In theory, it would work, but in reality, if the frame switch saw a packet come into it's ingress interface with the packet already marked DE, it will drop it because it was unexpected. I asked the telco's your question last year and that's the answer they gave me. C

Re: VoIP Clarification. [7:55682]

esn't have identifiers. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > The CM uses the MAC as a unique identifier in it's SQL database. It's > actually a distorted version of the MAC, su

Re: VoIP Clarification. [7:55682]

The CM uses the MAC as a unique identifier in it's SQL database. It's actually a distorted version of the MAC, such as a phone's identifier - SEP003094C26105 -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Great answer. Finally

Re: Cisco ExecNet [7:55573]

my cell phone) and I love them, but what I'm seeing is not the devleopment of bandwidth over their networks, but the 2.5G network development, and the standardization of the network with 1 common signal. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in mes

Re: Cisco ExecNet [7:55573]

I remeber what that emergency network is: GETS. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I always thought that the PSTN was based off of that fact that not all > phones would be calling a

Re: Cisco ExecNet [7:55573]

(or dying) and that most calls are circuit-switched across ATM now. Now if someone could just solve the last mile -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > ""Steven A. Rid

Re: VoIP Interoperability [7:55523]

I think you need to look at analog/digital gateways, and how they interact with a trunk connection on the different systems. At least thats how you tackle the problem from the cisco side. Or maybe the other VoIP solutions are H.323 compliant, and maybe you can get lucky and try that approach. I'

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >