When studying for the CCIE with friends, we decided that if you forget the
"broadcast" keyword, the terrorists win.
--T
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62754&t=62614
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: htt
I think something is being lost in the translation...
This confuses me, too.
--T
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62753&t=62728
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
your problem probably isn't their network, but the Internet (if that is
their transport). VOIP doesn't mean: no long distance charges by putting
our phone system on the internet. You can queue all day, but if the
internet is congested, your QOS goes right out the door.
--Tim
saj wrote:
>
> Hi
I would like to revise and extend your answer. :-)
A serial interface is not *always* point-to-point.
The answer actually depends on the Layer 2 protocol you are using.
If you are using Frame-relay, you have a DLCI mapped to the IP address. On
ATM you have a VPI/VCI combo. On point-to-point (
I may be off on this, but I think the bgp always-compare-med command enables
the comparison of MEDs from different AS's for best path determination, but
it does not make it the primary criteria. MED comparison is like step 6 in
the path determination algorithm.
check the following link on the Ci
I don't think either other response actually answered the question.
And the answer is: it depends.
If you are in an area of the US with modern telephone switching
equipment (i.e. almost all of it), I believe the answer is "No, it will make
no difference."
Should you find yourself
I used BFQ on the MCSE, and it was perfect. Too Perfect. Right down to the
typos on the MS test itself... It definately contributed to my perfect
record on cert exams, but one must make sure they understand the concepts,
not just memorize the answers.
--Tim
Message Posted at:
http://www.grou
I thought the 1st one was 1024 (1k). Don't know the most recent.
--Tim
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44298&t=44294
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report m
Sounds like your cow-orker was trained in the Miscrosoft way. Any networked
application verifies the stack if it is functioning.
--Tim
Cisco Nuts wrote:
>
> Hello,What is the command that tests all 7 layers of the OSI?My
> answer is
> any protocol that works at the Application layer including
Why would you have to set a DNS address or have it DHCP'd to you if you were
going to broadcast the request? Unicast it is!
--Tim
Kaminski, Shawn G wrote:
>
> This may be a silly question but I'm tired of searching for the
> answer, so
> here's the question:
>
> Does a Windows client send un
If all you need is 2 ethernet ports, and depending on your use for it, try
to find a 3101. 2 ethernet, 0 serial, 1 Con, 1 Aux. They are fairly
ancient, and not considered labworthy, but they (I think) can hold an IOS
with the firewall set, and they can NAT. If they don't have the memory
native
It was also told to me (on the 5th day of christmas) that the "set spantree
root" will dynamically decrement the spanning tree priority until that
switch becomes the root bridge.
Note, however, that the "set spantree root" command doesn't guarantee that
the switch will become root. i.e. if two
**Shakes Magic 8-Ball**
"My sources say No"
Well, there you have it. The frame-switch is preconfigured for you. I got
a similar response when I consulted it about the communications server.
--Tim, the Cheerful Cynic.
Juan Blanco wrote:
>
> Team,
>
> Do you have to setup the frame-relay swi
See if this link helps your situation...
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/23.html
--Tim
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43394&t=43392
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/l
I'm glad someone else feels that way. Talk about opening yourself up for
trouble...
--Tim
Gragido,William wrote:
>
> Members,
>
> This is a problem. I feel that is not only inappropriate for
> someone to
> solicit the aide of this board and its subscribers in order to
> crack
> passwords, it
You people spend MONEY on certification prep materials? I'm sorry. :-)
--Tim
Kaminski, Shawn G wrote:
>
> It's sad, the true signs of brainwashing :-)
>
> I never said anything was wrong with them. The proven track
> record comes
> from the fact that they've done a great job marketing their
I don't think you can filter based on MAC with Ethernet... There is a
technology in which you can, but I'm drawing a blank on what it was. I
think it was Token Ring only or some such nonsense. I think that it's
irrelevant, however, since it's still a router function and the switching
engine is
well, that's a bit twisted. :-) I guess those 200 other IP access lists
were not enough? I fear the router which can use them all and still somehow
forward packets.
I'm curious to find if I was correct on the other bit, though... The access
list should only apply to the Management functions o
OK, I'm not an all-powerful CCIE, but I'll take a stab at this.
Applying an access list to a switch is only going to limit access to and
from your management interface. Switched traffic through the switch is
still switched traffic, and by and large, a switch doesn't ever look at IP
information,
wow... I'm glad you were joking.
there were 5 posts while I wrote mine!
--Tim
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43018&t=42996
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
I'm glad you're just sending regards today, 'cause I'd send Rebecca right
back with your love.
What you just posted was 2 things.
1) It was not about cisco equipment, thus by your argument it should not
have been posted.
2) It was quite possibly the most arrogant thing I have ever seen anyone
p
point.
--Tim
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42459&t=42348
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is almost as good as when I got an email from Papa John (yes, the pizza
guy) to tell me he'd be out of the office. I've never met the guy, but I'm
glad he told me, I was gonna order a pizza that week!
--Tim
Paulo Cesar Buerger wrote:
>
> Estarei ausente no periodo de 21/01/2002 a 25/01/20
If one wishes for routing updates to bring up the link, can one not just use
the "passive-interface" command on the ISDN interface?
If it is a backup link, passive interface will keep routing updates will
keep the link from coming up for updates. Then a couple of floating static
routes on eith
The best way for me to understand is to do the binary, and let the shortcuts
go hang. As someone once said to me "I'm not smart enough to do the
shortcuts"
Kage Roc wrote:
>
> I promise I will not be a knowledge leech, I will contribute
> what I know as well. Ofcourse I do have a question re
oh, ok I was operating on what he said without the book in front of me...
Duh!
--T
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41770&t=41709
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.
I certainly hope that was a joke... Remote Access read like Japanese stero
instructions, but with no promised reward of music when you were done. :-)
--Tim
Kris Keen wrote:
>
> Go Switching, Remote and Support are a piece of cake, actually
> Remote Access I enjoyed reading, it was a great rea
What are you trying to ping when you see the broadcasts? is it local or
remote? is there a chance you are seeing the pre-ping arp requests?
--Tim
kaushalender wrote:
>
> Hi group ,
>
> I have network of 172.16.32/24 .When i put debug of ip icmp i
> see all ip
> in this network r pinging 172.
I kinda hope that was meant to be funny. :-)
--Timsamuel zou wrote:
>
> I'v just passed the BCRAN, there's no exam about 500 series
>
> Best Regard Samuel zou Tel: 62259099E-mail:
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>From:
> "Brian Zeitz" >Reply-To: "Brian Zeitz" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: CCNP
that looks odd, but I noticed different in the 2 configs was this:
1) Frame encapsulation was different (one was default, i.e. cisco, the other
was ietf (I Eat ToFu)) making it look like at different times, there were
different vendors routers across the link.
2) the bandwidth, which makes it l
I believe you are right... You are working on a ROUTER, therefore, it
prefers to ROUTE ROUTABLE traffic. If you take the ROUTING option away,
then it will attempt other configured methods of forwarding traffic.
--Tim
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>
> At 11:50 AM 4/6/02, nntp.groupstudy.com wro
This is why we love Priscilla. :-)
Here we were making the ASSumption that we were using a classfull subnet
mask.
Thank you, Priscilla, for once again letting us know we aren't really
worthy! :-)
--Tim
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>
> How many bits are defining network IDs and how many are
and yes, to those who study Cisco, there is only one "Todd".
-T
Jimmy wrote:
>
> I'm studying for the CCNA test. but should i wait to pick up
> the Sybex 607
> book, or will the 507 book suffice?
> You guys mention Todd's book. You guys are reffering to the
> Sybex book
> right?
> Also, is th
nothing solid that I know of... I know in the production networks I have
SEEN, nobody seems to care how many cables can be bundled. It's never been
an issue in the networks I've experienced.
Lou wrote:
>
> I am working on a project and have a question I can't find the
> answer
> to, despite 4
The truly fabulous way would be to wire in a toggle switch into the cable...
preferably with a large wad of electrical tape.
It should flap like a champ then.
-T
PING wrote:
>
> I am looking for some tool which can generate hardware line
> flaps. I
> have been doing this by going into the lab
bergenpeak wrote:
>
> I was somewhat surprised to see a Juniper box support cisco hdlc
> encap on a POS interface. Didn't realize that other vendors
> supported
> this standard. Which brings me to my question.
If such a goodly number of Juniper Engineers weren't former Cisco Engineers,
I'd be
read her background, and understand.
--Tim
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=38667&t=38662
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure v
I read this and wept for joy.
Then I went out to spread the good tidings to the networking masses.
They were likewise moved to tears.
--Tim
-for God Loveth a Cheerful Cynic.Steven A. Ridder wrote:
>
> I'm in a meeting with the CCIE program manager and they will be
> removing
> Token-ring soon
If you test date is a long way off, or you are close by, start walking now.
Remember to pack food and supplies for cold and warm weather. Also, a rain
poncho may be wise.
Carry or search for a cardboard box (the only approved Homeless/bum shelter
approved for use within San Jose). Find a space
Does the fact that it wasn't on a UPS imply that it also wasn't on a surge
supressor?
extrapolate conclusion.
--Tim
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37545&t=37543
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http:
I *KNOW* I didn't just see a brit scoff at some other country's food.
Not from the country that brought us meat pies and pudding that isn't.
j/k :-)
--Qtone
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33704&t=33592
--
FAQ, l
This may just be me operating witout caffiene, but are you saving the config
to Startup after the changes?
copy run star works wonders.
if I just insulted your intelligence, slap me around later.
-QTone
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33703&t=33645
---
42 matches
Mail list logo
