-Original Message-
From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 February 2003 18:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: L3 Switching Huh [7:63728]
At 3:18 PM + 2/26/03, Steve Wilson wrote:
Charles,
The 6509 switch needs some configuration in the background to create
.
Howard
-Original Message-
From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 February 2003 18:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: L3 Switching Huh [7:63728]
At 3:18 PM + 2/26/03, Steve Wilson wrote:
Charles,
The 6509 switch needs some configuration in the background
OK, let me try this again. I am trying to figure out the difference between
conventional layer 3 routing and layer 3 switching. A little background. I
am currently working towards my CCNA (have been for about 3 years). At any
rate, everything I read and look at says that switching/bridging is
If you are using MSFC2/PFC2, the PFC2 (does layer 3 wirespeed 'forwarding'
between Vlan) will have a FIB (forwarding information base), which is a copy
of the RIB (routing information base). The RIB is built on the MSFC2 (router
functions).
Even the first packet between Vlan 1 and 2 will be wire
: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 7:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: L3 Switching Huh [7:63728]
OK, let me try this again. I am trying to figure out the difference between
conventional layer 3 routing and layer 3 switching. A little background. I
am currently working towards my CCNA (have
it clears away some of the
mud.
Cheers,
Steve Wilson
Network Engineer
-Original Message-
From: DeVoe, Charles (PKI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 February 2003 12:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: L3 Switching Huh [7:63728]
OK, let me try this again. I am trying to figure out
At 12:45 PM + 2/26/03, DeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote:
OK, let me try this again. I am trying to figure out the difference between
conventional layer 3 routing and layer 3 switching. A little background. I
am currently working towards my CCNA (have been for about 3 years). At any
rate,
At 3:18 PM + 2/26/03, Steve Wilson wrote:
Charles,
The 6509 switch needs some configuration in the background to create a
virtual router.
A bit of a heads-up on this term. It's conceptually useful, but be
aware that virtual router was considered to be an alternate VPN
model to RFC 2547,
DeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote:
OK, let me try this again. I am trying to figure out the
difference between
conventional layer 3 routing and layer 3 switching. A little
background. I
am currently working towards my CCNA (have been for about 3
years). At any
rate, everything I read and
]
-Original Message-
From: DeVoe, Charles (PKI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 7:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: L3 Switching Huh [7:63728]
OK, let me try this again. I am trying to figure out the
difference between
conventional layer 3
PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: DeVoe, Charles (PKI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 7:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: L3 Switching Huh [7:63728]
OK, let me try this again. I am trying to figure out the
difference between
I am under the impression that switching is a layer 2 function and that
routing is a layer 3 function. I have seen several discussions talking
about layer 3 switching. Could someone explain this to me?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63728t=63728
Layer 3 switching combines the best of switching and routing in one
platform. The main advantage here is speed. The way it works is, in a
switch you have some kind of layer 3 routing engine (aka route processor, or
RP). For example, the MSFC2 (Multilayer Switch Feature Card 2) is one of
the
At 03:54 PM 2/25/2003 +, DeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote:
I am under the impression that switching is a layer 2 function and that
routing is a layer 3 function. I have seen several discussions talking
about layer 3 switching. Could someone explain this to me?
Bridging is a layer two function,
Switching Huh [7:63728]
I am under the impression that switching is a layer 2 function and that
routing is a layer 3 function. I have seen several discussions talking
about layer 3 switching. Could someone explain this to me?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i
,
3550-EMI, 400X, 5000,6509
Corrections anybody ?
Larry Letterman
Network Engineer
Cisco Systems
- Original Message -
From: DeVoe, Charles (PKI)
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 7:54 AM
Subject: L3 Switching Huh [7:63728]
I am under the impression that switching is a layer 2
Switching Huh [7:63728]
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 15:54:56 GMT
I am under the impression that switching is a layer 2 function and that
routing is a layer 3 function. I have seen several discussions talking
about layer 3 switching. Could someone explain this to me
More or less in one word, marketing!!
Dave
DeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote:
I am under the impression that switching is a layer 2 function and that
routing is a layer 3 function. I have seen several discussions talking
about layer 3 switching. Could someone explain this to me?
--
David
At 3:54 PM + 2/25/03, DeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote:
I am under the impression that switching is a layer 2 function and that
routing is a layer 3 function. I have seen several discussions talking
about layer 3 switching. Could someone explain this to me?
The bottom line is that layer 3
Robert Edmonds wrote:
Layer 3 switching combines the best of switching and routing in
one
platform. The main advantage here is speed. The way it works
is, in a
switch you have some kind of layer 3 routing engine (aka route
processor, or
RP). For example, the MSFC2 (Multilayer Switch
At 4:46 PM + 2/25/03, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Layer 3 switching combines the best of switching and routing in one
platform.
It isn't the best of both worlds, because raw forwarding speed is
frequently not the constraint on real-world network design. From a
cost standpoint, it would be
switch = router
Strongly recommend her book. The lady has a lot of style.
-HTH
-Bob Sinclair
CCIE #10427
- Original Message -
From: DeVoe, Charles (PKI)
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 10:54 AM
Subject: L3 Switching Huh [7:63728]
I am under the impression
on the MAC address???
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 1:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: L3 Switching Huh [7:63728]
Robert Edmonds wrote:
Layer 3 switching combines the best of switching
May I suggest people consult RFC 1812 and
http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/forces-charter.html
before going off into marketing definitions of switching?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63781t=63728
--
FAQ, list
At 04:46 PM 2/25/2003 +, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Layer 3 switching combines the best of switching and routing in one
platform. The main advantage here is speed. The way it works is, in a
switch you have some kind of layer 3 routing engine (aka route processor, or
RP). For example, the MSFC2
Huh [7:63728]
I am under the impression that switching is a layer 2 function and that
routing is a layer 3 function. I have seen several discussions talking
about layer 3 switching. Could someone explain this to me?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63785t
At 7:34 PM + 2/25/03, Bob Sinclair wrote:
Charles,
Regarding the meaning of the term switch, let me quote a few lines from
my favorite Net Goddess, Radia Perlman. She wrote the DEC STP protocol and
has been very active in protocol development since day one. In her book,
Interconnections,
is the RP making routing decisions based on the MAC
address???
No, of course not.
Priscilla
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 1:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: L3 Switching Huh [7:63728
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
Strongly recommend her book. The lady has a lot of style.
I don't remember if she's still doing a protocol design seminar
as
she used to do at Interop, but she's a delightful speaker, once
you
get used to the idea of somebody being a stereotyped New York
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
Strongly recommend her book. The lady has a lot of style.
I don't remember if she's still doing a protocol design seminar
as
she used to do at Interop, but she's a delightful speaker, once
you
get used to the idea of somebody being a stereotyped New York
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 February 2003 22:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: L3 Switching Huh [7:63728]
At 7:34 PM + 2/25/03, Bob Sinclair wrote:
Charles,
Regarding the meaning of the term switch, let me quote a few lines
from my favorite Net Goddess, Radia Perlman. She wrote
]
Sent: 25 February 2003 22:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: L3 Switching Huh [7:63728]
At 7:34 PM + 2/25/03, Bob Sinclair wrote:
Charles,
Regarding the meaning of the term switch, let me quote a
few lines
from my favorite Net Goddess, Radia Perlman. She wrote the
DEC
How do you nag a packet? Infact, is it not an oxymoron?
How would you feel if you were a packet confronted with a debug log
and a demand to explain
To nag is to continually pester or annoy, yet a packets lifetime is
normally measured in milliseconds, therefore she must be one hell of a
nagger!
33 matches
Mail list logo
