Hello:
An interviewer asked if I could enable RIP and OSPF on the same network.
I answered that it is possible to overlap protocols, but it is not
recommended. I said that OSPF has an Administrative Distance lower than RIP,
so OSPF will be the procotol in use.
Is that a complete/correct answer ?
Hello:
An interviewer asked if I could enable RIP and OSPF on the same network.
I answered that it is possible to overlap protocols, but it is not
recommended. I said that OSPF has an Administrative Distance lower than RIP,
so OSPF will be the procotol in use.
Is that a complete/correct answer ?
Hello:
An interviewer asked if I could enable RIP and OSPF on the same network.
I answered that it is possible to overlap protocols, but it is not
recommended. I said that OSPF has an Administrative Distance lower than RIP,
so OSPF will be the procotol in use.
Is that a complete/correct answer ?
Perfect with minor issues. RIP V1 only supports FLSM and OSPF supports
VLSM. So it depends on the IP addressing. Diameter of the network. RIP
support 16 hops and OSPF is unlimited.
That answer should have been good enough for most people though. Good luck,
JOE
CCNP, CCDP, and a few other th
Hey Joe, can you tell more about the "Diameter of the network" when using
RIP/OSPF ?
""Joe Martin"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
8genl5$kj5$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8genl5$kj5$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Perfect with minor issues. RIP V1 only supports FLSM and OSPF supports
> VLSM. So it dep
Joe answer was great but I would add that OSPF allows Route Summarization
--
Lou Nelson, CCNA, CCDA
Joe Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
8genl5$kj5$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8genl5$kj5$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Perfect with minor issues. RIP V1 only supports FLSM and OSPF supports
> VLSM.
Joe should be busy getting ready for his lab so let me.
RIP routes are limited to a maximum distance of 16 "layer 3" hops (i.e.
routers)... Basically your network could contain 26 routers but the max
route from one to another (a - z) could not hop thru more then 15 or RIP
would not see the rout
Test
""Lou Nelson"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:00b301bfc53b$16
fec180$[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Joe answer was great but I would add that OSPF allows Route Summarization
>
> --
>
> Lou Nelson, CCNA, CCDA
> Joe Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> 8genl5$kj5$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">ne
Also OSPF allows VLSM
At 11:30 AM 5/23/00 -0700, Billy Monroe wrote:
>Hello:
>
>An interviewer asked if I could enable RIP and OSPF on the same network.
>I answered that it is possible to overlap protocols, but it is not
>recommended. I said that OSPF has an Administrative Distance lower than RI
> At 11:30 AM 5/23/00 -0700, Billy Monroe wrote:
>Hello:
>
>An interviewer asked if I could enable RIP and OSPF on the same network.
>I answered that it is possible to overlap protocols, but it is not
>recommended. I said that OSPF has an Administrative Distance lower than
RIP,
>so OSPF will be th
FYI: We actually use this- we run OSPF to do routing on the interface to
it's
neighbor routers and run RIP to advertise a default route to the LANs so
the UNIX workstations can find the router via listening to the RIP
broadcasts
with their gated daemons. On RIP we only advertise a default 0.0.0.0
Hello,
I have ospf in to rip redistribution on a /24 classfull boundary, I
Summarized/ area range(d) all the networks in ospf domain to /24 to get them
to show up in rip.domain.
No real problems here, though I haved one network in ospf 200.200.0.0/16
which is not showing up in rip router.
""Casey, Paul (6822)"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hello,
>
>
> I have ospf in to rip redistribution on a /24 classfull boundary, I
> Summarized/ area range(d) all the networks in ospf domain to /24 to get
them
> to show up in rip.domain.
>
> No real problems here, though I haved one
I spent a fun couple of hours setting something up and playing around. some
comments below, without giving away answers, because once you discover this
for yourself you will have learned another useful tool.
""Casey, Paul (6822)"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hello,
>
>
> I have osp
I tried to achieve the result - no success; can you give us a tip?
What I did was using a /16 mask on the link between the RIP routers. But
when I use ip ad 200.200.1.1 255.255.255.0 RIP do not run on the interface,
although the interface is showed on the result of show ip protocol.
R1:
inter se
""alaerte Vidali"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I tried to achieve the result - no success; can you give us a tip?
>
> What I did was using a /16 mask on the link between the RIP routers. But
> when I use ip ad 200.200.1.1 255.255.255.0 RIP do not run on the
interface,
> although the
Serial connection between r2 and r1 is hdlc on the 141.108.1.0/24
network with RIP running on it for both r2 and r1. R1-->R3 and R1--> R4
are running OSPF in area 0. Generating the 141.108.3.0/24 from lo0 on
r4 and 141.108.4.0/24 from r3.
r2 ---141.108.1.0/24 ---r1 -- 141.108.255.0/30
-
From: Timothy Ouellette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 4:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OSPF/RIP w/ Summary address.
Serial connection between r2 and r1 is hdlc on the 141.108.1.0/24 network
with RIP running on it for both r2 and r1. R1-->R3 and R1
Timothy Ouellette wrote:
> What i'm trying to do is get the 141.108.3.0/24 and
> 141.108.4.0/24 to show up on r2 as rip routes heard from r1.
> I'm redistributing ospf 1 into rip with a metric of 5.
Hi Tim,
The short answer to your problem is that you are not actually
redistributing between y
hi all
anyone has any idea what is the minimum router model I
can buy to do BGP , OSPF, RIP ,EIGRP AND IGRP
WiLL A 17XX be sufficient?
regards,
suaveguru
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.
http://careers.yahoo.com
Message
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 2:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Min router model to run BGP , OSPF , rip , eigrp and igrp
[7:26453]
A 17xx would be OK, but also an 25xx.
Important is of course that you have an enterprise image.
""suaveguru"" schrieb im Newsbeitra
Your going to have to work out
> what level of features you
> want to play with.
> Thanks
> Nick
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> suaveguru
> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 10:37 AM
> To: [EMAI
eguru"
To:
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 9:28 AM
Subject: Min router model to run BGP , OSPF , rip , eigrp and igrp [7:25812]
> hi all
>
> anyone has any idea what is the minimum router model I
> can buy to do BGP , OSPF, RIP ,EIGRP AND IGRP
>
> WiLL A 17XX be suffi
>
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "suaveguru"
> > To:
> > Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 9:28 AM
> > Subject: Min router model to run BGP , OSPF , rip
> , eigrp and igrp
> [7:25812]
> >
> >
> > > hi all
ROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
suaveguru
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 10:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Min router model to run BGP , OSPF , rip , eigrp and igrp
[7:25910]
I am confused so who's right ? who's wrong?
regards,
suaveguru
--- Jason wrote:
&g
;"suaveguru"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> hi all
>
> anyone has any idea what is the minimum router model I
> can buy to do BGP , OSPF, RIP ,EIGRP AND IGRP
>
> WiLL A 17XX be sufficient?
>
> regards,
>
> suaveg
A 17xx would be OK, but also an 25xx.
Important is of course that you have an enterprise image.
""suaveguru"" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> hi all
>
> anyone has any idea what is the minimum router model I
> can b
ve an enterprise image.
>
> ""suaveguru"" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > hi all
> >
> > anyone has any idea what is the minimum router model I
> > can buy to do BGP , OSPF, RIP ,E
28 matches
Mail list logo
