Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: RE: ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712]
John,
It does need it. You need the dialer-group command under the interface even
if you don't define any interesting traffic in order for the router to send
traffic over the link
Yes, i have tried this also. IT does not work again.
The thing is that it connects, and the line protocol
becomes UP also, i m using access-list with
dialer-group and i have also used floating static
routes at both end, now it should work. but it does
not work.
Shoaib
--- El Pingu wrote:
Check your firewall ip routing table.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=3002t=2712
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations
I see no dialer-list command in your central site config.
CM
-Original Message-
From: Shoaib Waqar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 May 2001 09:15
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712]
I am getting trouble in ISDN bri link. I have a
Central site
1)It is very obivous, definitely routing problem.
since show isdn status is active and up, ppp layer is successful.
2)Define static route to the destintaiton network. Link state protocol
is not recommended.
For example, Eigrp will trigger your ISDN always up due to
I personally think that using dialer profiles are better than hard coding
the interface. It is also true that there is no dialer-list command to dial
for interesting traffic, and you don't have a route to use the bri interface
so it wouldn't know when to dial.
Wouldn't you need a dialer map
Hi Dave,
I am using EIGRP as routing protocol, but this will
come into account when i have to reach the remote LAN,
rite now EIGRP is initiating DDR, i m testing for dial
backup, offcourse when the communication will begin,
my task would be just to add two commands on the
primary link. The issue
Dear Chong, rite now this is only the testing for DDR,
when the sides will start communicationg, offcourse i
will be using floating static route for this, the main
issue is the ping of neighbor interface , not the LAN
address. I think everyone has misunderstood this
scenario.
Shoaib
---
I have tried dialer profiles, legacy DDR with dialer
mao statement and with floating static route too, but
still same result, could not ping the neighbor.
Offcourse there is a dialer-list statement to initiate
call:
dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
Shoaib
--- Albert Lu wrote:
I personally
Shoaib, y don't u add static routes...?
-Original Message-
From: Shoaib Waqar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 5:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712]
Hi Dave,
I am using EIGRP as routing protocol, but this will
come
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 1 May 2001 9:54
To: Albert lu
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712]
I have tried dialer profiles, legacy DDR with dialer
mao statement and with floating static route too, but
still same result, could not ping the neighbor
Dear Singh, it is already there.
Shoaib
--- Vivek Singh wrote:
Shoaib, y don't u add static routes...?
-Original Message-
From: Shoaib Waqar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 5:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712
, then
it could be a dialer
problem. If it does come up, and dialing fails, then
it could be an isdn
problem.
Albert
-Original Message-
From: Shoaib Waqar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 1 May 2001 9:54
To: Albert lu
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ISDN BRI up
]
Subject: RE: ISDN BRI up but does not ping
[7:2712]
I have tried dialer profiles, legacy DDR with
dialer
mao statement and with floating static route too,
but
still same result, could not ping the neighbor.
Offcourse there is a dialer-list statement to
initiate
call
.
Albert
-Original Message-
From: Shoaib Waqar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 1 May 2001 10:15
To: Albert lu
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ISDN BRI up but does not ping
[7:2712]
Yes i also have used an access-list to prevent
eigrp
to initiate
.
Albert
-Original Message-
From: Shoaib Waqar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 1 May 2001 10:15
To: Albert lu
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ISDN BRI up but does not ping
[7:2712]
Yes i also have used an access-list to prevent
eigrp
to initiate
side, and see what route
the packet takes.
Albert
-Original Message-
From: Shoaib Waqar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 1 May 2001 10:15
To: Albert lu
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ISDN BRI up but does not ping
[7:2712]
Yes i also have used an access
]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 3:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712]
Hi, Shoaib.
First of all, you have to check if the ping packet is ever received by
the remote end, is it possible to debug ip packet at the remote end?
If it's not possible, check
this behavior with 12.0 IOS.
-Original Message-
From: Jaeheon Yoo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 3:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712]
Hi, Shoaib.
First of all, you have to check if the ping packet is ever received
Also, you're going to need dialer-list statements for both routers.
From: Jaeheon Yoo
Reply-To: Jaeheon Yoo
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712]
Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 18:24:58 -0400
Hi, Jim
My understanding is dialer-group statement does NOT block any
for a few hours.
List, please correct me if I'm crazy. I noticed this behavior
with 12.0 IOS.
-Original Message-
From: Jaeheon Yoo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 3:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712]
Hi
/2001
04:43:18 am
Please respond to Shoaib Waqar
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: RE: ISDN BRI up but does not ping [7:2712]
I have traced the route as well, the data is not
passing across the ISDN link.
I also have used extended ping, but it does not ping
ok...i have been through this one.
my suggestion.
make sure you have an access list associated with dialer-group 1
and on the remote site.
put a static route on both sides one on remote to get out and one on central
to get you
to remote and advertise to your network with a hevier weight than
23 matches
Mail list logo