On 2003-01-24(Fri) 15:45:01 -0800, George Mitchell wrote:
I am trying look over the latest version of Xfree but my system requires
XFree-devel which in turn requires fontconfig-devel which is not
currently available on the mirrors. Anyone know what is going on with
this package?
On 2003-01-23(Thu) 18:35:36 -0800, Quel Qun wrote:
Hi,
New rpm are coming through but the old ones are not deleted (at least
from uninett) so it's only a matter of time before they run out of
space.
As an Mandrake employee (I think it's either warly or gc) said, Mandrake has
absolutely no
On 2003-01-22(Wed) 17:35:34 +0100, Frederic Crozat wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 11:14:50 -0500, Tim Lee wrote:
Are you, by any chance, having a high security level ?
I don't think so. In /etc/sysconfig/msec, SECURE_LEVEL is set at 2. What
file or directory would affect FAM like that?
On 2003-01-20(Mon) 11:11:35 +0100, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
[Bug 795] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-01-18 23:42 ---
Still not fixed in Beta 2.
this is a feature request not a 'fix to be done' !!
XFree86 only has shadow cursors
On 2003-01-20(Mon) 11:39:43 +0100, Pascal Terjan wrote:
XFree86 only has shadow cursors shipped by default, AFAIK.
Besides, if non-shadowed version of cursor is used in Mandrake,
I'm afraid hundreds of complaint will pop up instead of this
one. :)
BTW Is this a problem here or as the white
On 2003-01-20(Mon) 16:06:17 +0100, Benjamin Pflugmann wrote:
I can see it, too. AFAICT, it's the border of the shadow. Both parts,
the cursor itself and the shadow have their own transparency.
Therefore, the left part of the cursor (without the shadow) is more
transparent then the right part
On 2003-01-19(Sun) 21:00:36 -0500, Austin Acton wrote:
I don't see any advantage of packaging the three icons as one archive.
I use the following...
[]
I don't see how that's any worse than one tarball. While it is longer,
I don't think clarity should take a back-seat to brevity.
On 2003-01-16(Thu) 09:14:32 +0100, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
i have read the above thread and i agree on the stupid scripts
destruction but i strongly disagree with these stupid requires as i
did use geramik theme even if some think it's just not another gtk
theme
So you should know that these
On 2003-01-16(Thu) 09:14:25 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
So you should know that these stupid requires are used to mimic what
David wants, but not what *I* want.
That's simply not true, though. David said that Geramik shouldn't be
*used* by people who use GNOME, which is perfectly true -
On 2003-01-14(Tue) 16:48:46 -0800, David Walser wrote:
Now I see the point. Geramik is trying to do what
Bluecurve did, right?
Basically. More specifically, the color, font, and
related settings that you configure for Keramik in KDE
Control Center are what Geramik uses, rather than
On 2003-01-15(Wed) 10:57:06 -0800, David Walser wrote:
That means you need to make Geramik cope with
people's
change in behavoir.
Still doesn't make sense. I'll agree with one point
you've made...if there were a way to have it install
itself by default, but only activate for users that
On 2003-01-16(Thu) 07:11:43 +0100, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
R.I.P. Deaddog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is this possible?
The simplest way I can think of is:
Requires: kdebase
Conflicts: gnome-desktop gnome-session
and if one want both kde and gnome ?
and if one does not want kde
On 2003-01-14(Tue) 15:07:53 +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
Guillaume Rousse wrote:
I'd like to have other people feedback on this point. If everyone agrees, the
plf package could be dropped.
For =9.0 yes.
Yup, even multibyte TTF work well here.
Abel
--
Abel Cheung
GPG Key: (0xC67186FF)
On 2003-01-14(Tue) 05:17:05 -0800, David Walser wrote:
--- Frederic Crozat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Name: Geramik
Version : 0.17
* Tue Jan 14 2003 Frederic Crozat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.17-2mdk
- Drop the gtkrc
On 2003-01-14(Tue) 09:08:48 -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 03:03:51PM +0100, Mandrakesoft packages database wrote:
better tool in e2fsprogs
Which tool is it that is better?
I guess it is refering to /sbin/resize2fs.
Abel
--
Abel Cheung
GPG Key: (0xC67186FF)
On 2003-01-14(Tue) 06:33:17 -0800, David Walser wrote:
I think that this is not only broken, but *abusive*
too. Theme is a
per-user setting, why is it trying to make itself as
a global theme by
default?
The idea is if you install this you *want* that. BUT,
On 2003-01-14(Tue) 07:11:34 -0800, David Walser wrote:
--- Frederic Crozat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is right.. Theme packages should not screw up
default theme.. There
is no point for discussion on that..
Geramik is not a normal theme. The only useful
purpose it serves is being
On 2003-01-13(Mon) 22:13:32 +0100, Steffen Barszus wrote:
urpmi kde-desktop would installs a bunch of kde-packages
urpmi mandrake-development installs gcc / gcc-c++ kernel-header and so on.
urpmi mandrake-simple-desktop could provide an small kde-desktop with only
one programm for each task
On 2003-01-02(Thu) 16:48:11 -0500, Yura Gusev wrote:
Stefan van der Eijk said:
--=-=-=
Name: automake1.6
Version : 1.7.2
URL : http://sources.redhat.com/automake/
--=-=-=
Please update URL http://www.gnu.org/directory/GNU/automake.html
Bugzilla can be a better
On 2003-01-02(Thu) 21:47:42 -0500, Quel Qun wrote:
Is there any reason why the last 0.9.0 version is not used in
cooker instead of the old version. It seems that only gnumeric
requires libgda0, but nothing prevents libgda2 to be installed
besides it.
As a side note, libgnomedb2 should be
Hi all,
Lately some packages were nuked from cooker (was it gc or warly who
did it?), so I may miss the boat.
Another good candidate to be removed is GXedit, which is unmaintained
since Jan 2000. I suppose nobody is using it?
--
Abel Cheung
GPG Key: (0xC67186FF) http://deaddog.org/gpg.asc
On 2002-12-26(Thu) 07:04:45 -0500, Charles A Edwards wrote:
I suppose nobody is using it?
I use it almost exclusively.
It is mush faster to load than gedit.
Even so, since the project itself is no longer being maintained and the
URL for it no longer exists (only the 1998 sf dl page)
:
* GXedit
* SVGATextMode
Anymore?
R.I.P. Deaddog wrote:
[..]
Another good candidate to be removed is GXedit, which is unmaintained
since Jan 2000. I suppose nobody is using it?
--
Abel Cheung
GPG Key: (0xC67186FF) http://deaddog.org/gpg.asc
msg84525/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP
On 2002-12-25(Wed) 04:16:21 -0600, Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
When I give the command:
rpmbuild --rebuild --target=athlon kernel-2.4.20.2mdk-1-1mdk.src.rpm
the process crashes after a couple of minutes...
Is this the correct command? I have also tried using
On 2002-10-28(Mon) 16:06:55 +0100, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
ac-wrapper: ouch, couldn't call binary (/usr/bin/autom4te-2.13).
autoheader-2.5x: /usr/bin/autom4te failed with exit status: 2
I've had this problem before. Not sure what causes the problem. Try
When my script wrongly
On 2002-12-19(Thu) 10:22:51 +0100, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
I had this problem with gstreamer-plugins, without an explicit
libtoolize call the C++ plugins wouldn't link to libstdc++.
Well, what we do in libtool is simply a workaround. You have to fix
gstream-plugins there too. ;-)
On 2002-12-12(Thu) 13:18:02 +0100, G?tz Waschk wrote:
I think the %configure2_5x macro should be fixed. ATM it expands to:
[goetz@klama SRPMS]$ rpm --eval %configure2_5x
CONFIGURE_TOP=${CONFIGURE_TOP:-.};
CFLAGS=${CFLAGS:--O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -march=i586 -mcpu=pentiumpro\} ;
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
In addition to the failure caused by the config bundled
inside RPM :(
Oh, I forgot to ask - what is the problem with distributed config?
Without detailed study it looks more or less O.K.
-andrej
It's this line:
source remote { udp(); };
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Alexander Skwar wrote:
When starting Gnome 2, I've got close to no menu items in the Gnome
menu. That's with a blank user I created for testing.
Is this expected?
Alexander Skwar
Yes, I think fcrozat has posted many times on cooker list that
at least a completely
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 09:45:24PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
The user or any script or something..
In my case anyway, no. Nothing has edited these config files for
which .rpmnew files are being created.
Next time I do an update
On 28 Apr 2002, Steve Fox wrote:
Any idea why gconf-editor wouldn't be on my system? It used to be. I
noticed something on one of the gnome lists about a build fix, so maybe
that's why it's not in the current packages?
libGConf2_4-1.1.9-2mdk
libGConf1-devel-1.0.9-2mdk
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
some known cases.
http://www.balabit.hu/en/products/syslog-ng/
There are also packages which will watch output from (ordinary or NG) syslog
and trigger on what they see.
Better if you list out the available of the RPM in contrib.
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
There is some documentation here :
http://www.balabit.hu/static/syslog-ng/reference/book1.html
But it's not written in an easy-to-undertand format .. it seems to be
quite technical.
-- Geoff.
This reference is created around the time
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
Any idea's?
Build fine here..
Try look better at errors during compilation (errors you posted are not
causing any problem..
Doesn't build on my system either.
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Alan wrote:
In looking at the spec file for xscreensaver I notice that xmatrix and
extrusion are set not to build.
extrusion I can understand because it requires a specialized GL extrusion
library.
As a matter of fact, the gle library is in cooker too.
Abel
Why
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Alan wrote:
In looking at the spec file for xscreensaver I notice that xmatrix and
extrusion are set not to build.
extrusion I can understand because it requires a specialized GL extrusion
library.
As a matter of fact, the gle library is in cooker too.
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Alan wrote:
xmatrix: of course it's the stupid copyright
If this is correct, then someone is stretching copyright paranoia a little too
far.
During the old days, it's pretty dangerous. When things
settle down, people tend to ignore it. But if it's brought
out
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Goetz Waschk wrote:
Am Dienstag, 23. April 2002, 17:10:08 Uhr MET, schrieb R.I.P. Deaddog:
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Alan wrote:
extrusion: gle is in contrib (and things on main
[...]
Why hasn't anyone of you looked at the spec file of latest xscreensaver?
There's
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
here is a temporary fix:
[...]
While on this topic: could you please decomment /usr/lib/perl5/man line in
/etc/man.conf ?
too late for 2mdk.
now, export LESSCHARSET=latin1 and less won't
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Charles A Edwards wrote:
Regards.
Or you can get an unofficial mandrake based rpm at :
ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/contrib/texstar/Mandrake-8.2-i586
nautilus-mozilla needs to be updated for a successful texstar upgrade.
I do not
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Han wrote:
file /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgail.so from install of libgail13-0.13-1mdk
conflicts with file from package libgail11-0.11-1mdk
Please search cooker archive, there has been discussion on this problem.
This must be an error:
file /usr/share/vim/lang/fr
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Frederic Crozat wrote:
gail will be freezed for GNOME 2.0 release since it is part of the
platform..
Oh, I have thought that it is similar to libgda etc -- won't freeze.
If it's freezing like other components do, then it's worthy to wait.
Then no more fix is necessary :)
On 18 Apr 2002, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Since:
[gc@bi ~] ls -l /usr/share/vim/lang
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 17 Apr 3 05:22 /usr/share/vim/lang -
/usr/share/locale/
And now:
[gc@bi ~] rpm -qplv /RPMS/vim-common-6.1-4mdk.i586.rpm | grep /usr/share/vim/lang$
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Pascal Terjan wrote:
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Installing vim-common-6.1-4mdk screwed up all my
/usr/share/locale directory (thx Titi).
Didn't it conflict with anything ?
Here I got file conflicts with :
kde-i18n-fr-2.2.2-1mdk
koffice-i18n-fr-1.1.1-1mdk
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
Attached a patch to check carefully whether $datadir/vim/lang
is a real directory before removing it.
Besides, I remembered somebody suggested to keep /bin/vi link
to /bin/vim-minimal forever, so that one can still use vi if
/usr is not
On 18 Apr 2002, Brice Figureau wrote:
Installed it a few minutes ago, and it seems to work now.
Another question: it seems that the bonobo-activation and the gconf2
servers are not stopped when I log out, is it normal ?
Yes, just like what oafd and gconfd behave for Gnome 1.x. :/
--
Abel
-1.1.4-3mdk
libgimpprint1-4.2.1-5.pre5.1mdk
Abel
R.I.P. Deaddog wrote:
That means the above packages try to own /usr/share/locale/*,
which should belong to locales-* packages instead. I'm not
sure if KDE people will fix it at all, but for cups-common
and libgimpprint1, perhaps Till will fix
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Goetz Waschk wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 18. April 2002, 15:45:30 Uhr MET, schrieb Frederic Crozat:
- Obsoletes nautilus-mozilla
Why? Is the current nautilus-mozilla package too unstable?
nautilus-mozilla is a Gnome 1.x thing, and
nautilus-gtkhtml is a Gnoem 2.x thing.
--
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Goetz Waschk wrote:
- Obsoletes nautilus-mozilla
Why? Is the current nautilus-mozilla package too unstable?
Is it not unstable, it doesn't work with nautilus 1.1.x ... (GNOME 1 vs
GNOME 2 ...)
I thought I saw a Gnome2 package named nautilus-mozilla, what
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Charles A Edwards wrote:
--=-=-=
Name: vim Relocations: (not relocateable)
Version : 6.1 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
Release : 5mdk Build Date: Thu Apr 18 14:51:39 2002
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Frederic Crozat wrote:
I don't plan to split gail more : gail is not yet API/ABI frozen but it
will be frozen for GNOME 2 release.. So, it won't add anything good to
split gail now.. I'll wait for gail 1.0 and after, I'll see if we really
need to slip it..
In the mean
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Todd Lyons wrote:
A couple of rpms produced some strange output:
scrollkeeperwarning: /etc/scrollkeeper.conf created as
/etc/scrollkeeper.conf.rpmnew
##
/usr/share/gnome/help/mailcheck/C/mailcheck.xml:308:
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Charles A Edwards wrote:
file /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgail.so from install of
libgail13-0.13-1mdk conflicts with file from package libgail11-0.11-1mdk
fcrozat, probably it's appropriate to split out
/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/lib{ferret,gail}.so into
another subpackage
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Frederic Crozat wrote:
--=-=-=
Name: gnome-games Relocations: (not relocateable)
Version : 1.90.2Vendor: MandrakeSoft
Release : 1mdk Build Date: Thu Apr 11 11:36:49 2002
--=-=-=
* Thu
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, civileme wrote:
Not trying to start a flame war I would really like to find a good mta
and that doesn't include sendmail.
First I would like to know if this vulnerability still exists or if it
has been fixed in mandrake?
http://cr.yp.to/maildisasters/postfix.html
On Sat, 13 Apr 2002, Alexander Skwar wrote:
gnome-media ##
/usr/bin/scrollkeeper-update: /usr/local/share/omf: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht
gefunden
/usr/bin/scrollkeeper-update: /opt/gnome/share/omf: Datei oder Verzeichnis
On Sat, 13 Apr 2002, Alexander Skwar wrote:
I just got this when installing scrollkeeper-0.3.6-1mdk:
scrollkeeper##
/usr/share/gnome/help/mailcheck/C/mailcheck.xml:308: error: End tag : expected ''
para
^
On Sat, 13 Apr 2002, Alexander Skwar wrote:
»Alexander Skwar« sagte am 2002-04-13 um 01:18:30 +0200 :
/usr/bin/scrollkeeper-update: /usr/local/share/omf: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht
gefunden
/usr/bin/scrollkeeper-update: /opt/gnome/share/omf: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht
gefunden
On Sat, 13 Apr 2002, Alexander Skwar wrote:
gnome-applets ##
warning: failed to load external entity
/etc/gconf/schemas/{battstat*,cdplayer*,charpick*,drivemount*,geyes*,gkb*,gtik*,gweather*,mini-commander*,
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
openssh-3.1p1
openssl-0.9.6c
libhdf5_0-1.4.2p1
These are not preversion : p is for patch level ... (ie openssh 3.1
patch level 1..)
Nope.
p for portable, http://www.openssh.org/portable.html
You're right, I confused
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
http://www.linux-mandrake.com/howtos/mdk-rpm/advanced.html#PREVERSIONS-NAMING
but they are actually plenty of counter-examples in distro:
openssh-3.1p1
openssl-0.9.6c
libhdf5_0-1.4.2p1
etc...
No, the aforementioned problem only applies to
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Frederic Crozat wrote:
here is a quick status about GNOME 2 integration in cooker :
the latest part of GNOME 2 main desktop package has been uploaded
(gnome-panel) which replace the old gnome-core package...
Actually the situation is: gnome-core has been splitted into
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Frederic Crozat wrote:
No way because GTK+ team has not said it is supported yet or no way for
some other reason, like you don't like gtk-x11 and gtk-linux-fb
conflicting with each other?
Because it is not supported yet..
And why wait until it is officially
On 29 Mar 2002, [ISO-8859-1] Frédéric Crozat wrote:
In /usr/share/aclocal/libxml.m4 one can find #include xmlversion.h
two times. This is wrong, it has to be #include
libxml/xmlversion.h.
For libxml2, when using AM_PATH_XML macro, xml2-config --cflags is used
and add
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Charles A Edwards wrote:
urpmi is not handling all the depends needed to install, or more exactly the depend
have depend which urpmi is not handling.
# urpmi libgnomeprintui2.0_0 libgnomeprintui2.0_0-devel
To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to
On Sat, 23 Mar 2002, Todd Lyons wrote:
I'm getting errors uploading/downloading keys to *.keyserver.net with
gnupg. The same keys work just fine with *.pgp.net (which eliminates
variables like firewalls, diskspace, mailer configuration, etc).
Running in debug mode, it works successfully
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 04:21:27AM +0800, R.I.P. Deaddog wrote:
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
Have you checked the CDs? 0.98.2 is already present in CD#2...
Oh wow. There it is.
Too bad it don't work. I have only been
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Frederic Crozat wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 07:47:55PM +0100, Frederic Crozat wrote:
Name: gtk+2.0 Relocations: (not
relocateable) Version : 2.0.0 Vendor:
MandrakeSoft Release : 1mdk
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
OK, so now that 8.2 out and Cooker is cooking again can we get
GnomeICU updated to the 0.98.2 release?
Have you checked the CDs? 0.98.2 is already present in CD#2...
Abel
--
GPG Key: (0xC67186FF) http://deaddog.org/gpg.asc
On 21 Mar 2002, William Kenworthy wrote:
Which cooker SRPM contains popt ? a dir *popt* on uio shows nothing,
but popt* binary rpm's exist.
BillK
It's the rpm-4.0.x source RPM.
Abel
On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, Warly wrote:
So the datum is: release date is March the 15th.
Now we need to do it in this timeframe (and we are the 17th), and
we have no other choice.
In a few days 8.2 updates will be released, and them you will have
the real stable and polished distro you want.
The following signed package is uploaded to /incoming.
=
Name: jasper Relocations: (not relocateable)
Version : 1.500.4 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
Release : 1mdk
New gcal source RPM is uploaded to /incoming:
===
Name: gcal Relocations: (not relocateable)
Version : 3.01 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
Release : 5mdk
On Sat, 16 Mar 2002, Hoyt wrote:
When installed, gives message that group nobody does not exist, running as
root.
Yes, nobody has already been replaced with nogroup, I assume. You
can have a look at setup-2.2.0 changelog.
BTW, I'd want to ask if you can help me test a new junkbuster.
My
On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Frederic Crozat wrote:
hi,
what about GNOME 2.0 ?! Shall it be included in MDK8.2 it is
currently Beta2
And final version will be May 1st 2002 ...
No comment..
Please blame me here, I promised fcrozat that I can package it,
but not delivered any of my
On 12 Mar 2002, Bryan Paxton wrote:
locales: localedef is hrm broken (at least from my end), segfaults,
reason unknown.
Search the mail archives, I made a few posts about this.
armagetron: eh, bad code or patch iirc
ImageMagick: Compiles fine, but there's some wierd perl regex
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Kimmo Hovi wrote:
I just uploaded AfterStep 1.8.11-2mdk source rpm.
Working on updating the default start menu. Sadly none of the
active developers use the default menu (wonder why ;), so
it's ages old. Wonder if this will be included in 8.2
Better yet, provide it on
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Vincent Meyer, MD wrote:
Why does apache need lynx? Trying to unselect lynx during package selection
in RC1 says it will de-select about a dozen packages, including apache,
apache-conf, apache-mod-perl, etc.
excerpt from /etc/init.d/apache:
LYNX=lynx -dump
On 9 Mar 2002, Bryan Paxton wrote:
It perhaps might be the latest gcc, specifically libstdc++, but it
could be my optimizations that made something in libstdc++ fubar...
I'm
going to compile for i686, but with the default rpm opt flags and see
what's what : )
I'll email back
On 9 Mar 2002, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
I can complete list of previous URLs by hitting TAB in URL input field.
I can also select one of them with ENTER but Galeon starts download
immediately. How can I select for editing, so that I can change it.
A quick workaround is to press ESC quick
On Sat, 9 Mar 2002, huug wrote:
is it possible to remove a wrong dependency from a rpm package?
I'd like to test further but can't install KDE because
kdeutils-2.2.2-24mdk.i586.rpm misses lha and I won't wait for the
update. ;-)
Well, LHA ain't that big:
The point is, *why* is lha
On Sat, 9 Mar 2002, Warly wrote:
Tomorrow we will be in deep freeze.
That's mean that no package upload will be allowed
except for severe showstoppers.
RC1 contains 2 important pbs that are now nearly fixed,
symlinks are broken on CDs with supermount enable (fixed in
the latest cooker
--=-=-=
Name: textutilsRelocations: (not relocateable)
Version : 2.0.17Vendor: MandrakeSoft
Release : 5mdk Build Date: Thu Mar 7 15:54:46 2002
--=-=-=
* Thu Mar 07 2002 Thierry Vignaud [EMAIL
On 5 Mar 2002, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
$ rpm -qa | grep libwmf02
libwmf02_1-021-1mdk
libwmf02_2-022-1mdk
That's the point of the new lib policy
So we just get more and more and more libs forever? Is this why I have
Yes, we have decided that this problem is far
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
install-info: warning: no entries found for
`/usr/share/info/coreutilsinfobz2'; nothing deleted
install-info: menu item `yes' already exists, for file `sh-utils'
install-info: menu item `yes' already exists, for file `sh-utils'
Yes, confirmed this
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Keld [iso-8859-1] Jørn Simonsen wrote:
Nice to have: I see that there are a number of different
supports for different file types with vim It would be nice
if the po macros were also supported out of the box
Pablo even advertises the po-macros on the Mandrake
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Is it *really* necessary to translate 'frozen bubble' to 'bulle glacées' in
menu :-) ?
That really depends on the translator's taste or translation
team's policy If you really dislike it, you can talk to the
translator of menu-messages
Abel
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Keld [iso-8859-1] Jørn Simonsen wrote:
The gettext version delivered with beta3 was 01040
It would be nice if the new gettext version was delivered instead
The recent version is 011something, pablo would know more
keld
I guess nobody would like such change in cooker
On 4 Mar 2002, andre wrote:
Is it *really* necessary to translate 'frozen bubble' to 'bulle glacées' in
menu :-) ?
That really depends on the translator's taste or translation
team's policy If you really dislike it, you can talk to the
translator of menu-messages
Names
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Keld [iso-8859-1] Jørn Simonsen wrote:
The gettext version delivered with beta3 was 01040
It would be nice if the new gettext version was delivered instead
The recent version is 011something, pablo would know more
I guess nobody would like such change in cooker
On 4 Mar 2002, andre wrote:
There are many cases that, even though a brand name has an official
translation, people just ignore the translation and uses English
brand name
On the contrary, I've seen other cases that, once a name has a
translation, nobody uses the original name
On 2 Mar 2002, Bryan Paxton wrote:
This patch changes part of the buildrequires in the latest xmms.spec.
[...]
Anyway, here's the patch, nice and small : )
-BuildRequires: libpanel_applet-devel libglib-devel libgtk+-devel libxml-devel
libvorbis-devel libogg-devel
+BuildRequires:
On 23 Feb 2002, Daouda LO wrote:
Name: libgtop Relocations: (not relocateable)
Version : 1.0.13Vendor: MandrakeSoft
Release : 2mdk Build Date: Sat Feb 23 05:12:26 2002
--=-=-=
* Fri Feb 22
On 24 Feb 2002, Daouda LO wrote:
Name: libgtop Relocations: (not relocateable)
Version : 1.0.13Vendor: MandrakeSoft
Release : 2mdk Build Date: Sat Feb 23 05:12:26
2002
--=-=-=
*
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Frederic Lepied wrote:
Name: libgtop Relocations: (not relocateable)
Version : 1.0.13Vendor: MandrakeSoft
Release : 2mdk Build Date: Sat Feb 23 05:12:26 2002
--=-=-=
* Fri Feb 22
My mail was rejected before. This is a re-send.
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
These are the BR for the current (1.3.12-1mdk) package:
[..]
gdk-pixbuf-devel = 0.7.0
gtk+-devel = 1.2.5
gnome-libs-devel = 1.0.59
Unless there is a REAL need to specify the required
My email was rejected. This is a re-send.
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Because common-licenses is required by basesystem. It should always be
on your system, so there is really no need to list it.
Well, if I remove basesystem (which is required by nothing), I could
also
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Schlomo Schwartz wrote:
surely libmysql10-devel-3.23.47-4mdk.i586.rpm
Why has this package been renamed? Even Red Hat's
rawhide still calls it mysql-devel (not to mention
what RPMs you can download from mysql.com). I just
don't understand why these package names
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Frederic Crozat wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002 10:34:20 +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote:
»Frederic Crozat« sagte am 2002-02-14 um 10:26:55 +0100 :
No, you are wrong.. We are trying to switch to implicit
BuildRequires..
I don't understand. What do you mean by
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hi!
Recently, I often see this warning when configure is run:
+ ./configure i686-mandrake-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr
--bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share
--includedir=/usr/include
101 - 200 of 624 matches
Mail list logo
