On Wednesday 19 November 2003 07:52 am, Warly wrote:
> More doc about mkcd and how to make CDs, very uncomplete still, tough.
Thank you for taking the time in doing this. I have been getting lots of mail
from people asking if I have gotten any farther and I have to keep telling
them no. This a
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 01:10 am, Todd Lyons wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Todd Lyons wanted us to know:
> >Just checking if I'm the only one experiencing weirdness with urpmi? I
> >have a local mirror syncing from mirrors.usc.edu and have a pretty
> >current syn
Will somebody please fix this stuff? The mirrors are still not updated since
the last security update. Why are advisories posted when the packages are
not on the mirrors or mirrors are not updated?
http://www.mandrakeclub.com/article.php?sid=1370
--
/g
"Outside of a dog, a man's best frien
Will somebody please fix this stuff? The mirrors are still not updated since
the last security update. Why are advisories posted when the packages are
not on the mirrors or mirrors are not updated?
http://www.mandrakeclub.com/article.php?sid=1370
--
/g
"Outside of a dog, a man's best frien
On Sunday 16 November 2003 06:12 pm, Alberto Ridolfi wrote:
> Hello guys,
> I give support at MandrakeExpert and there was an
> incident created by an user very dissatisfied with
> Mandrake Linux 9.2. If you guys want to take a closer
> look, the incident number is 72784. The user says
> after upgr
MDKA-2003:027 was issued on 11-14 and the rpms haven't hit the mirrors yet.
Last update of mirrors was 11-12 when fileutils/coreutils was updated. The
RPMS are usually on the mirrors when the advidsory is released. This
happened once before with an earlier update. ???
--
/g
"Outside of a do
On Friday 14 November 2003 09:33 pm, Galileo wrote:
> O> Ouch
> There is no need for it now since the LG released updates for their
> firmware and procedure how to fix the dead drives.
> It would be nice if Mandrake would release updated iso-s for
> club members or a howto on how to do it ourselves
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 08:45 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It's maybe an old talking theme,
> but mailing lists are not very easy to use.
> A forum could be better and more easy to find the things we wants to see.
> What is the general advice ?
> Why there's not already a forum?
I hate Forum
On Saturday 08 November 2003 01:41 pm, Aronsmith wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 09:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > http://www.HImandrake.com/cd_distribution.php
>
> Mega cool
>
> > __
> > Want to buy your Pack or Services from Man
On Friday 07 November 2003 04:42 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
> Greg Meyer wrote:
> > For Danny and Buchan, I have been using your test rpms for ATI kernel
>
> modules
>
> > and Win4Lin together on my Thinkpad for about four hours now without any
> > problems. Every
For Danny and Buchan, I have been using your test rpms for ATI kernel modules
and Win4Lin together on my Thinkpad for about four hours now without any
problems. Everything seems to be quite stable.
--
/g
"Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, inside
a dog it's too dark to read" -Gro
This may not be the place, but since this is a Mandrake associated program, I
thought it might be.
I spent awhile playing Frozen Bubble tonight. It is very addicting. Anyway, I
was think that it would be interesting to not just know how many levels I
completed, but also how many shots it took
On Monday 03 November 2003 08:59 am, Galileo wrote:
> BH> well i have finished my own set and have made my own iso's but I don't
> think BH> that is what you mean. They are not fancy and still say cooker
> 9.2 when you BH> install them but they still pull updates from the 9.2
> tree. I would put up
On Monday 03 November 2003 05:48 am, Götz Waschk wrote:
> Am Montag, 3. November 2003, 11:39:35 Uhr MET, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > Götz, you work to hard:)
> > Any objections if I put them on club (with obsoletes for the in-house
> > version?)
>
> You can do everything the license permits. Pl
Are we going to see updated ATI kernel modules for the 9.2 kernel updates?
--
/g
"Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, inside
a dog it's too dark to read" -Groucho Marx
On Friday 31 October 2003 10:19 pm, Robert L Martin wrote:
> Daouda LO wrote:
> >Really funny :))
> >Nice catch about the translation, Jan!
> >
> >Roger, "Arreter la presse (des CDS)" is a better translation for
> >"STOP THE PRESSE(S)".
>
> I just hope that somebody did yell whatever is correct or
I was setting up a chroot environment tonight and I did
'urpmi --root /mnt/newroot kmail'
and XFree86 did not get installed. Is this normal or correct?
--
/g
"Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, inside
a dog it's too dark to read" -Groucho Marx
On Thursday 30 October 2003 08:37 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 13:22, Greg Meyer wrote:
> >>I think Buchan's point is that if one tries to start X and it fails,
>
> XFdrake
>
> >>should be launched autom
On Thursday 30 October 2003 08:11 am, Teletchéa Stéphane wrote:
> > This kind of question should never need to be asked ...
> >
> > Regards,
> > Buchan
>
> Sorry to be against you Buchan, but as he knew there is a console
> program in RH, he should knew there is also one in Mdk aka XFdrake ...
I
On Wednesday 29 October 2003 11:35 am, Galileo wrote:
> It doesn't matter what has changed. What matters is that there is
> a difference between my rpms (in rpms rpms2 rpms3 ) and mirrors.
> A was under impression that RPMS dir on mirror holds everything that I
> get on my 3 cds. I will check this
On Wednesday 29 October 2003 03:38 pm, Galileo wrote:
> GM> I think all you should have to do is replace the packages and then run
> some GM> scripts that update the package lists in the Mandrake/base
> directory. GM> gendistrib should be one, but I don't know of the others.
>
> Have you considered
On Tuesday 28 October 2003 06:07 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Scott's issue is that he _is_ a fully subscribed Club member and is on
> > the appropriate announce lists
>
> MandrakeClub was the place this issue was first brought to light (in the
> MandrakeClub forum), about 19 October. I reporte
On Tuesday 28 October 2003 11:43 am, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
> Le Mardi 28 Octobre 2003 14:40, Greg Meyer a écrit :
> > Why is dynamic desktop required by devfs? Shouldn't it be the other way
> > around, that dynamic requires devfs?
>
> I allready asked, but never got an
Why is dynamic desktop required by devfs? Shouldn't it be the other way
around, that dynamic requires devfs?
--
/g
"Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, inside
a dog it's too dark to read" -Groucho Marx
On Monday 27 October 2003 01:06 pm, Robert Fox wrote:
> Subject says it all . . .
>
I think it is. Isn't it?
--
/g
"Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, inside
a dog it's too dark to read" -Groucho Marx
On Sunday 26 October 2003 05:08 pm, R N dev wrote:
> ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making
> /usr/src/RPM/BUILD/oo_1.1rc4_src/officecfg/registry/schema
> dmake: Error code 1, while making 'build_all'
> ---* TG_SLO.MK *---
> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.78934
> (%build)
I had sa
On Sunday 26 October 2003 08:34 am, Spencer wrote:
> >I don't think there is any, which is why I started the twiki page. If I
> > can piece together everybody's tips and tricks and uses of mkcd, maybe we
> > can get a good doc on the matter. So please report your usage in detail,
> > or if you ha
On Sunday 26 October 2003 07:28 am, John Allen wrote:
> On Sunday 26 October 2003 12:23 pm, Brook Humphrey wrote:
> > On Sunday 26 October 2003 01:51 am, John Allen wrote:
> > > Could you post a .conf file for creating 2 DVD-R's?
> > >
> > > Currently I just run MakeCD without specifying a config f
On Friday 24 October 2003 08:52 am, R N dev wrote:
> Can anyone help me?
>
> Angelo
>
> =
> Building project readlicense_oo
> =
> /usr/src/RPM/BUILD/oo_1.1rc4_src/readlicense_oo
> /usr/src/RPM/BUILD/oo_1.1rc4_src/readlicense_oo/html
> /usr/src/RPM/BUILD/oo_1.1rc4_src/readlic
On Saturday 25 October 2003 07:28 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Friday, October 24, 2003 07:52 am, R N dev wrote:
> >> Can anyone help me?
> >>
> >> Angelo
> >>
> >> =
> >> Building project readlicense_oo
> >> =
> >> /usr/src/RPM/BUILD/oo_1.1rc4_src/readlicense_oo
> >>
On Saturday 25 October 2003 07:20 pm, Juan Quintela wrote:
> > "marc" == Marc Guise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> marc> I read the post about Mdk 9.2 and LG on mandrakeusers.org. I have
> cd-rw drive, marc> model HL-DT-ST GCE 8400b and I have Mdk 9.2rc2 running.
> There are no problems marc>
On Saturday 25 October 2003 06:39 pm, Michael Scherer wrote:
> On Sunday 26 October 2003 00:12, Greg Meyer wrote:
> >
> > This appears to be an undocumented feature. Are there any others
> > that are interesting?
>
> a lot.
> but since they are undocumented, we do
On Saturday 25 October 2003 04:32 pm, Pascal Terjan wrote:
> I just tryied urpmi --root /tmp/mdk basesytem, it worked really nicer
> than the first time I did it months ago.
>
> Only got 2 errors (except for kernel but that's not a problem) :
>
> 8:glibc ###
On Saturday 25 October 2003 04:32 pm, Pascal Terjan wrote:
> I just tryied urpmi --root /tmp/mdk basesytem, it worked really nicer
> than the first time I did it months ago.
>
> Only got 2 errors (except for kernel but that's not a problem) :
>
> 8:glibc ###
On Saturday 25 October 2003 10:06 am, Warly wrote:
> list -k cooker_key_file -k update_key_file 1 cooker_path/misc/download
Is the update key pubkey2 or pubkey3 in Mandrake/base?
--
/g
"Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, inside
a dog it's too dark to read" -Groucho Marx
On Thursday 23 October 2003 09:30 am, John Keller wrote:
> I would be much more interested in this kind of solution. Wiki markup
> should stay simple, especially since mixing style and layout tags with
> content raises the barrier for contributors.
>
It would probably make sense to include the body
On Saturday 25 October 2003 10:06 am, Warly wrote:
>
> 2nd solution, remaster the CD. Use the config files into the misc dir
> into repositories. Replace the list line with
>
> list -k cooker_key_file -k update_key_file 1 cooker_path/misc/download
> cooker_path_/misc/main rpmlist -b update_RPMS/
>
On Saturday 25 October 2003 02:00 pm, Emmanuel Moll wrote:
> Look for an earlier post called "New ISO with updates". I'ver worked on
> this this week-end and should have ISOs ready by Monday (fingers crossed).
>
>
I still think that we need an official remastered iso from Mandrakesoft of at
least
On Saturday 25 October 2003 10:06 am, Warly wrote:
> Leon Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Is there a simple HOWTO somewhere with the steps I need to walk through
> > to produce new Download Edition ISOs but with the updated RPMs in place
> > of the originals?
> >
> > Yes, I know it's slack t
On Saturday 25 October 2003 07:42 am, Steffen Barszus wrote:
> > On Friday 24 October 2003 07:14 am, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> > > Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > For the moment, it seems it's related to LG CRD-84xx drives.
>
> Another Question. Is it safe to install Md
On Friday 24 October 2003 04:19 pm, Vincent Danen wrote:
> The nvidia rpms should be up by now or very shortly... waiting on the Club
> webmaster for that. The ATI ones will be up as soon as I obtain the srpms.
Are we going to see the club_com_i586_9.2 hdlist updated so these will be
available i
On Friday 24 October 2003 01:20 pm, Brook Humphrey wrote:
> > On this page
> > http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/advisories/advisory.php?name=MDKA-2003:0
> >20
> >
> > Mandrake says that all of the mandrakeclub commercial drivers are
> > available.
> > Quote:
> > "New commercial drivers for this ker
On Friday 24 October 2003 07:14 am, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > For the moment, it seems it's related to LG CRD-84xx drives.
>
> My updated list:
>
> fried:
> CRD-8322B
> CRD-8400B (machine: IBM PC 300 PL)
> CDR-8400B(mi)
=> ^^
Is this a typo?
On Thursday 23 October 2003 04:04 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Maybe there should be a policy on bugs ... bugzilla should not allow new
> bug submissions from when RC2 is released ;-).
>
This would be great if there were no new bugs introduced in the rc's, but as
9.2 clearly made plain, new bugs
On Thursday 23 October 2003 07:43 am, Emmanuel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> More and more people I talk to about Mandrake are interested in trying
> it out. Now, I'd like them to be able to try it out without having to
> install 220MB of updates once it's installed (they're all mainly on
> dial-up).
> Woul
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 01:35 pm, Rob wrote:
> I assume the program's name was meant to be something like "imp
> with a g at the beginning" but that just sort of demonstrates
> the problem with naming things "geverything" and "keverything".
Actually, I think it was named the GNU Image Manipul
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 09:51 am, Pascal Terjan wrote:
> Greg Meyer wrote:
> >
> > Yes. I have confirmed that if I take that tag out of the code it renders
> > correctly in Mozilla. Perhaps this is a bug in Mozilla/Gecko.
>
> Is this normal to have a tag outsid
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 07:53 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
>
> All gecko-based browsers show this (Mozilla, Firebird, Galeon,
> Epiphany). IE is fine, so is Konqueror.
>
It works in Opera too.
> The offending bit is I think this tag (looking at the html source
> of the page as it is displayed):
>
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 05:34 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
>
> > http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/twiki/bin/view/Main
>
> The only problem is someone introduced the big black bar at the top, I
> think between this one:
> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/twiki/bin/view/Main/MandrakeLinux?rev=1.35
> and this one
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 05:22 am, Warly wrote:
> Greg Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > With all the complaining about missing packages (i.e. kernel-source
> > package) and the debate about what should have been left out instead
> > (i.e. emacs or alternate ker
I spent a lot of time tonight applying the style that Buchan created on the
main page to the rest of the pages in the Cooker Twiki. Hopefully this gives
the whole site a more polished, professional feel.
In addition, I set up the Web template so that all new pages will be able to
have the same
I remember lot's of talk on splitting list. Has this been done yet?
--
/g
"Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, inside
a dog it's too dark to read" -Groucho Marx
On Tuesday 21 October 2003 01:30 pm, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
> ביום שלישי, 21 באוקטובר 2003, 15:45, נכתב על ידי Greg Meyer:
> > With all the complaining about missing packages (i.e. kernel-source
> > package) and the debate about what should have been left out instead
> > (i.
On Tuesday 21 October 2003 02:20 pm, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
> are you asking "why does mandrake do not let me steal this album"?
>
> lol
Who said anything about stealing. It is long established that if I buy a
recording, that I may make an additional copy/copies for my own and my
household's per
On Tuesday 21 October 2003 09:51 am, Ron Stodden wrote:
> The download for the Linux application/x-shockwave-flash plugin from
> macromedia will not install on Mandrake 9.2
>
> Does anybody know where to get a plugin that does install and work?
The one I got from Club Commercial area (which is the
With all the complaining about missing packages (i.e. kernel-source package)
and the debate about what should have been left out instead (i.e. emacs or
alternate kernels, etc.) I had a thought that might be helpful.
Obviously, in order to make everybody happy, the number of images needs to be
i
On Saturday 18 October 2003 10:43 pm, Scott Chevalley wrote:
> I've been updating my box using urpmi --auto-select for at least the past
> two or three release cycles, constantly running cooker. I'm wondering if
> there is anyway to use urpmi or rpm to give me a list of files that exist
> on my sy
On Saturday 18 October 2003 09:29 am, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> [...]
>
> I downloaded the PowerPack this week but installed it today..., what a
> surprise... no kde-i18n-sv package anywhere... That render this download
> totally useless to me, I might as well throw my fresh burned CDs in the
> trash.
On Saturday 18 October 2003 03:39 am, Ron Stodden wrote:
> Simon Oosthoek wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 11:04:01AM +1000, Ron Stodden wrote:
> >>Another 9.2 showstopper!
> >
> > Post it at: bugs.mandrakelinux.com
>
> No. I have legally carried out my only duty - to notify MandrakeSoft,
> the
On Friday 17 October 2003 03:41 pm, magic wrote:
> Hey all,
>
>I'm trying to install 9.2, and its failing.
>
>The CD Boots, and gets to the install screen. I get as far as
> checking the mouse.
>
>After I hit next, I see it scanning (loads raid driver) then it scans
> the floppy (flopp
On Thursday 16 October 2003 11:37 am, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> Ron Stodden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Oddly, installing all the 9.2 updates solved all problems
> > (although there is no apparent reason why in the explains of the
> > RPMs involved).
>
> There seems there is still an odd "l
On Tuesday 14 October 2003 03:12 pm, lolomin wrote:
> i can confirm this also !
> same problem here with urpmi.update ! need to delete and add back
> again sources to get latest packages !
This problem exists in 9.2!
--
/g
"Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, inside
a dog it's too d
On Thursday 16 October 2003 11:37 am, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> Ron Stodden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Oddly, installing all the 9.2 updates solved all problems
> > (although there is no apparent reason why in the explains of the
> > RPMs involved).
>
> There seems there is still an odd "l
On Wednesday 15 October 2003 01:03 pm, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> The 3-CD bought edition has exactly the same free software as the
> 3-CD free edition. The only added stuff is non-free stuff (Nvidia
> drivers etc); there's still some of main left out. It's not a
> commercial decision, it's a spac
On Tuesday 14 October 2003 05:45 am, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
> Has anybody else noticed that urpmi.update may be broken?
>
> when I run urpmi.update, it doesn't pick up changes. Removing the
> media and adding it again lets it pick up the changes.
>
> # urpmq libltdl3 -r
> libltdl3-1.4.3-7mdk
>
On Monday 13 October 2003 02:56 am, Götz Waschk wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 12. Oktober 2003, 20:40:46 Uhr MET, schrieb Greg Meyer:
> > I am having trouble posting this on bugzilla, so I apologize
> > for spamming this to the maintainers.
>
> > My hunch is that this is a
Where did the tabs go in fluxbox-0.9.6? Anybody know?
--
/g
"Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, inside
a dog it's too dark to read" -Groucho Marx
I am having trouble posting this on bugzilla, so I apologize
for spamming this to the maintainers.
My hunch is that this is a problem with the fluxbox packaging,
especially since a recent entry in the fluxbox specfile was
to add menu entries.
Somehow, the menu entries for fluxbox are tripping
On Sunday 12 October 2003 00:02, Jay DeKing wrote:
> I haven't been able to compile any of the versions that use ".run" files.
They
> all complain that they can't find the kernel header files, even though they
> are looking in the correct directory. 4191 works fine, so I'm sticking with
> it fo
On Saturday 11 October 2003 05:41 am, Juan Quintela wrote:
>
> Current theory is that:
>
> New driver with cards older than GForce3 fail. GForce4 MX if I
> remember correctly is just a GForce2 core "on steroids".
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?s=f3e1d887e964cecb3ee2ff0b6a280ef8&
On Saturday 11 October 2003 05:41 am, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Current theory is that:
>
> New driver with cards older than GForce3 fail. GForce4 MX if I
> remember correctly is just a GForce2 core "on steroids".
>
>
> Later, Juan "learning too much about NVidia graphics cards".
>
Works fine he
On Friday 10 October 2003 08:26 am, Michael Lothian wrote:
> Hi
>
> I wan't to join Mandrake club it get the 9.2 ISO when they're released
> and also to do my bit for mandrake
>
> Is it possible to pay monthly?
>
This is a question for the MandrakeClub webmaster, not the Cooker Development
ML.
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 07:27 pm, Vedran Ljubovic wrote:
> It's the argument of "never change anything, make
> people learn our ways instead".
If our way is better :-)
> I believe that separating tasks and not putting
> anything in the installation that isn't absolutely
> necessary makes a
On Sunday 05 October 2003 08:55 am, Thomas Backlund wrote:
> People will start saying: "... but you updated that package ...",
> and "this package adds or modifies this or that feature that is needed... if
> we don't have it I consider it's broken... and we can't have a "broken"
> distrib..."
Wa
On Saturday 04 October 2003 15:26, Philip Webb wrote:
> 031004 Marcel Pol wrote:
> > On Sat, 4 Oct 2003 12:17:54 -0400
> > Greg Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Is anyone planning on building XFce4 for contrib?
> > It could just replace xfce in main I&
Is anyone planning on building XFce4 for contrib?
--
/g
"Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, inside
a dog it's too dark to read" -Groucho Marx
On Thursday 02 October 2003 06:22, Buchan Milne wrote:
> Greg Meyer wrote:
> > Is there a kernel-win4lin-source rpm for the purpose of installing nVidia
> > drivers.
>
> No need, just use the kernel-source rpm for the kernel the win4lin
> kernel is built against.
>
&
On Wednesday 01 October 2003 22:22, Greg Meyer wrote:
> Is there a kernel-win4lin-source rpm for the purpose of installing nVidia
> drivers.
> --
Never mind, apparently I am a dope and should crawl back under the rock from
whence I came.
--
/g
"Outside of a dog, a man's be
Is there a kernel-win4lin-source rpm for the purpose of installing nVidia
drivers.
--
/g
"Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, inside
a dog it's too dark to read" -Groucho Marx
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 06:07 am, David Walser wrote:
> Laurent Montel wrote:
> >> And splitting a single application (kopete and others) into 3-4 seperate
> >> rpms just doesnt make sense.
> >
> > Why ?
> > Do you know libification ?
>
> Is it necessary when nothing besides that single app
Awhile back I had tried to setup urpmi sources with multiple mirrors for each
source, thinking that if one mirror was busy, urpmi would move to the next.
In this way, I wouldn't have to worry about not being able to login and try
again, urpmi would simply move to the next preferred mirror.
Whe
On Monday 29 September 2003 10:13 pm, Sascha Noyes wrote:
> On Monday 29 September 2003 07:09 pm, Jason M. Randle wrote:
> > "Great minds discuss ideas.
> > Average minds discuss events.
> > Ignorant minds discuss people.
> > what is ignorance? well, its lack of willingness to learn or be
corre
Everything you need to know about how to remove yourself from the list is in
the mail headers. You've had the power to remove yourself all along.
--
/g
"Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, inside
a dog it's too dark to read" -Groucho Marx
On Monday 29 September 2003 12:00 pm, Frank Griffin wrote:
> Apologies if I somehow missed this thread, but how come
>
> ./MakeCD -t /data -a /data/cooker/i586
>
> which used to produce 4 650MB ISO images is now producing 9 ? Is mkcd
> including all of contrib now ?
>
use -c switch to control
Here's my 2 cents
On Sunday 28 September 2003 04:19, Warly wrote:
>
> It may be a good idea, before cooker opens again, to take these days to
> have some brainstorm.
>
> May you give your opinion on :
>
> - What was wrong in 9.2 development process?
I'd really like to see some of the design de
On Sunday 28 September 2003 05:36 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
> Warly While the people here can help in answering this question for
> sure. It's also one that should go out to the expert list as well.
> Some of the people here are on both yes, but there is a group there that
> has dedicated itse
On Sunday 28 September 2003 06:07 pm, Buchan Milne wrote:
> http://bugs.mandrakelinux.com/
Very Cool. Thanks Vincent
--
/g
"Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, inside
a dog it's too dark to read" -Groucho Marx
On Sunday 28 September 2003 01:18 pm, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
> * use also apt-get (with the same repositories, IMHO this can be done no?),
> let the user which app use to install rpms.
I don't understand the continued romanticism with apt when urpmi has matured
so nicely. It even takes two fewe
On Friday 26 September 2003 10:02 am, Duncan wrote:
> Greg Meyer posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
> below, on Thu, 25 Sep 2003 18:22:31 -0400:
>
> > On Thursday 25 September 2003 12:09 am, Han Boetes wrote:
> >> Greg Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&g
On Thursday 25 September 2003 07:08 pm, Salane King wrote:
> > Yeah. I can't start a terminal because there is no menu entry for a
> > terminal. Since I can't start a terminal to get a CLI, I can't start a
> > terminal from the CLI.
> >
> > No menu entry for rxvt and no menu entry in fluxbox menus
On Thursday 25 September 2003 10:05 am, Robert Fox wrote:
> Could someone share the correct command line for mkcd or MakeCD to
> create say 3 ISO's from a local Cooker tree . . .
>
> This would be very helpful!
>
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/twiki/bin/view/Main/MakeCD
--
/g
"Outside of a dog, a
On Thursday 25 September 2003 05:58 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
>
> Anyway, the patch in the SRPM is the one from Netraverse, which they
> were using for 2.4.22.7mdk, and since it still takes, I don't see that
> they would need to change it.
>
> Netraverse will have kernels out quite soon I guess, b
On Thursday 25 September 2003 12:09 am, Han Boetes wrote:
> Greg Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Fresh install, log into fluxbox, no [EMAIL PROTECTED] terminal.
>
> Can you debug that?
>
Yeah. I can't start a terminal because there is no menu entry for a term
Is kdm the default display manager again? I just did a fresh install of
Cooker and I got kdm instead of mdkkdm as the display manager.
--
/g
"Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, inside
a dog it's too dark to read" -Groucho Marx
Fresh install, log into fluxbox, no [EMAIL PROTECTED] terminal.
--
/g
"Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, inside
a dog it's too dark to read" -Groucho Marx
On Wednesday 24 September 2003 06:59 pm, Rolf Pedersen wrote:
> Anyway, Mandrake has sold in stores before, maybe they will again, when
> cash is more plentiful. I am confident they are making prudent
> decisions, not acting out of ignorance of the market.
Don't forget that RedHat has announced
Any chance that the "official" kernel for 9.2 could be "officially" provided
to Netraverse so they can get working on an "official" Netraverse supported
kernel for Win4Lin that will work with their graphical installer?
I know Buchan has built a 9.2 kernel in contrib that supports Win4Lin, but
l
On Wednesday 17 September 2003 01:30 pm, [simon.duane] wrote:
> No, I for one think this bug should be kept open (i.e. re-opened) until
someone
> has incorporated the fix into mandrake's distribution.
>
> Is this as simple as substituting texstar's rpm(s) for the one(s) presently
in
> the dist
On Wednesday 17 September 2003 06:15 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How about a compromise? Put it in the Configuration menu (where it
> belongs). User terminals (gnome-terminal, konsole etc etc, can go in
> Terminals, but rxvt should only be needed for configuration work so that's
> where it belon
On Sunday 14 September 2003 02:07 am, Mike Eheler wrote:
> Has anyone tried upgrading some installations that maybe have been
> worked in a bit? Some self-compiled programs, some mixed rpms, some
> external rpms (i.e. freshrpms, ximian, etc).
>
I'll try it as soon as I get a chance to copy my ex
1 - 100 of 367 matches
Mail list logo
