On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 12:02, Vedran Ljubovic wrote:
--- Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, just accept the username and password, and show
some moving
graphics until you have authenticated the user.
Ever noticed how long it takes to tell you your
password is wrong on
first
On Sat, 2003-10-25 at 06:57, Emmanuel Moll wrote:
Righto, the isos are created and I'm just about to test them. If I
cannot find any problems, I'll bittorrent them on Monday under the name
of Manudrake-9.2.1 (I'm fairly sure i cannot use the name Mandrake and
9.2.1 is better than 9.2SP1 (in
On Sat, 2003-10-25 at 13:52, Emmanuel Moll wrote:
I am quite newbie with the whole signing the packages thingy. How do I
check all the packages signature and (if failed) how do i resign the
packages with a given signature???
You don't really want to resign anything, the objective in checking
On Sat, 2003-10-25 at 14:28, Greg Meyer wrote:
On Saturday 25 October 2003 02:00 pm, Emmanuel Moll wrote:
Look for an earlier post called New ISO with updates. I'ver worked on
this this week-end and should have ISOs ready by Monday (fingers crossed).
I still think that we need an
--- Brook Humphrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok I need to say this. I always get really cruddy torrent speed and
everybody
says punch a hole in you firewall which I have not and will not do.
Torrent
works fine on my end without messing with the firewall. However i
always get
speeds of
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 18:31, Vincent Danen wrote:
On Thu Sep 25, 2003 at 11:13:04PM +0200, Han Boetes wrote:
Can't we dump wu-ftpd? I mean there are lots of more secure
alternatives and this daemon still has regular exploits.
wu-ftpd is only in contribs
Ok, that's in the good
On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 00:01, Leon Brooks wrote:
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 00:49, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
Anybody who endorses communism is an idiot.
Seems to work OK if the majority of participants are altruists. Mind
you, so does any other political system.
Cheers; Leon
The burden of proof
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 06:27, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 06:57, guran wrote:
On Friday 05 September 2003 07.32, Han Boetes wrote:
guran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally I think that much of the value of Linux apart from quality
is the right to make one owns
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 19:55, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
Bryan Whitehead wrote:
am-utils is a very much-needed package for Linux to integrate into big
UNIX shops.
NASA/JPL (at least in my section) is a big UNIX Shop. Wiothout
am-utils we are pretty screwed... is there a reason this
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 19:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5 Sep 2003, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
idiot. For that matter anybody that endorces socialism is an idiot.
Yes ofcourse, and everybody that endorces liberalism is stupid.
Please, if you want to proclaim your political standpoint somewhere
On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 08:24, Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Sunday August 31 2003 04:07 am, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
Here's what I get:
fc59fe2f3f3817d93bd3805d427b5970
MandrakeLinux-9.2rc1-CD1.i586.iso
e5324a8c2de4af472538373525d8b7aa
MandrakeLinux-9.2rc1-CD2.i586.iso
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 04:45, John Allen wrote:
On Sunday 17 August 2003 17:28, Aleksander Adamowski wrote:
Duncan wrote:
RPM 4.2 does its own key handling, rather than relying on gpg. Thus, you
need to export those Mdk keys in ascii armored format, then import them
into RPM. You can
Yep, I knew one was definitely coming back.
On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 03:33, Adam Williamson wrote:
and then maybe you won't get spanked. But of course I don't really
I don't see me getting spanked by anyone but you. Now where does that
imply the problem lies?
Same place it always was with
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 14:59, Adam Williamson wrote:
I think you're placing entirely too much emphasis on the choice of words
Not really, I'm just quoting what you said and pointing out how stupid
and idiotic it was. Just like you do to others very frequently. Quite
naturally you're
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 11:18, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Frank Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
So, the problem
appears to be in the FlashPlayer RPM,
Maybe you could report that to the author of the RPM then?
Thanks!
Happy to, but the
On Sun, 2003-08-03 at 22:47, Jay DeKing wrote:
On Sunday 03 August 2003 8:41 am, Leon Brooks honored me with this communique:
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 15:01, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
What the heck was the problem with either gdm or kdm?
Dunno, perhaps looks too complex to a newbie, perhaps
On Sun, 2003-08-03 at 14:03, Emmanuel Moll wrote:
KDm is very good but looks-wise GDM kicks ass. Here is what could be a
compromise:
-Keep the central window of KDM with the user display and all the
buttons
-Integrate KDM in the background (quite easy, use the same colour for
the widget as
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 08:26, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 01:20, Robert L Martin wrote:
And personally i would strip all of the You are logged in as Root
You are a Bad and Foul Person dialogs from the distro. (now i would
not enable auto log in for Root like certain
On Sun, 2003-08-03 at 08:41, Leon Brooks wrote:
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 15:01, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
What the heck was the problem with either gdm or kdm?
Dunno, perhaps looks too complex to a newbie, perhaps they want to add
an XP-style flowers-on-the-background user list. I immediately switch
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 09:10, FACORAT Fabrice wrote:
Le lun 04/08/2003 à 03:15, Ken Thompson a écrit :
I think something along this line is what I was trying to get accross.. I
wasn't at all emotional, just pointing out that many others don't like mdkkdm
and that I personally detest it.
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 10:43, Buchan Milne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
If I want to run kdm, I don't want the system telling me I can't
uninstall mdkkdm because some marketing psycho freak at Mandrake thinks
mdkkdm will be good
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 10:51, Steffen Barszus wrote:
Am Montag, 4. August 2003 16:06 schrieb Lyvim Xaphir:
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 09:10, FACORAT Fabrice wrote:
If I want to run kdm, I don't want the system telling me I can't
uninstall mdkkdm because some marketing psycho freak at Mandrake
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 11:11, Ken Thompson wrote:
Logging in as root is really not the issue, being able to type the
name/password pair of any user of my choice is the issue.
As has been mentioned, with many users, which I don't have, the icon list is
too big to be comfortable. So, what I'm
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 11:20, Buchan Milne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ken Thompson wrote:
Logging in as root is really not the issue, being able to type the
name/password pair of any user of my choice is the issue.
As has been mentioned, with many users, which I
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 11:53, Frederic Crozat wrote:
On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 11:38:18 -0400, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 10:51, Steffen Barszus wrote:
Am Montag, 4. August 2003 16:06 schrieb Lyvim Xaphir:
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 09:10, FACORAT Fabrice wrote:
If I want to run
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 11:27, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 14:33, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 08:26, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 01:20, Robert L Martin wrote:
And personally i would strip all of the You are logged in as Root
You
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 01:19, Dave Cotton wrote:
Tried urpmi --auto-select this morning and got:-
kdebase-3.1.3-4mdk.i586 (due to missing mdkkdm-9.1-28mdk.i586)
kdebase-nsplugins-3.1.3-4mdk.i586 (due to missing mdkkdm-9.1-28mdk.i586)
libkdebase4-nsplugins-3.1.3-4mdk.i586 (due to missing
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 06:34, Adam Williamson wrote:
Ah, it's another Ron Stodden Special. Had Ron bothered to READ the
archives before posting his latest instalment of self-important bile,
he'd've seen the post that told us that the -BOOT kernel currently being
used is the one from 9.1, and
On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 03:56, Ben Reser wrote:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 08:13:40AM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
If I'm submitting a change to an existing package, and the packager
is Mandrake Linux Team http://www.mandrakeexpert.com (e.g.,
libsigc++1.2), what do I do with the specfile?
On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 12:49, MEISCH,CORY (HP-Vancouver,ex1) wrote:
Hi Guys,
I just wanted to say congrats on getting HP to distribute MDK 9.1 on
new systems we're selling. Now we have the best distro on the best
hardware... (j/k on the second part). Anyway, keep up the good work and I'll
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 06:44, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
MEISCH,CORY (HP-Vancouver,ex1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Without getting too many feathers ruffled, it does seem to me that
enhancement requests seem to fall on deaf ears.
I have tried other distros and Mandrake is the best, so
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 00:38, w9ya wrote:
Well the issues you are talking about : package management and query have
little to nothing to do with the actual installation process in ANY operating
system from a user's standpoint. So
I think the real issue we have been talking about is NOT
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 05:54, Adam Williamson wrote:
No, Lyvim. For everyone else on this list, this is a simple practical
matter of what is the best way for rpmdrake to function. No-one on this
list, to the best of my knowledge, being an automaton, we all inevitably
have different ideas on
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 18:39, Steffen Barszus wrote:
Am Freitag, 20. Juni 2003 21:36 schrieb Buchan Milne:
IMHO, the fact that you need 17 screenshots says enough about it's
complexity, and although there seem to be some nice features
(disk-free-space meter and it seems to be able to show
On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 15:43, MEISCH,CORY (HP-Vancouver,ex1) wrote:
Without getting too many feathers ruffled, it does seem to me that
enhancement requests seem to fall on deaf ears.
I have tried other distros and Mandrake is the best, so I'm willing to give
my time, talent, and opinion on
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 06:44, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
MEISCH,CORY (HP-Vancouver,ex1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Without getting too many feathers ruffled, it does seem to me that
enhancement requests seem to fall on deaf ears.
I have tried other distros and Mandrake is the best, so
The servers were down for about 20 hours. Just went back up about 45
minutes ago or about.
--LX
--
Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk Linux Mandrake 9.1
Enlightenment-0.16.5-12mdk Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk
Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 10:02, Pierre Jarillon wrote:
Le Mardi 17 Juin 2003 11:57, Guillaume Cottenceau a écrit :
I still fail to see why people start installing software to see
installed packages.. Typical scenario is to start the given
program for a given task, isn't it? I launche
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 09:35, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 17 Jun 2003, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
I still fail to see why people start installing software to see
installed packages.. Typical scenario is to start the given
program for a given task,
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 14:32, Michael Scherer wrote:
I don't like mandrakeclub much.
But you like their money, right? Maybe you don't like your mother,
but she gave birth to you, so you at least owe her a nod.
Well, I don't think that Mandrakeclub give birth to Guillaume, so, I
business
strategy, and I am quite sure no posts to this list by and Mandrakesoft
employee should be taken as company policy ...
Noted. But the topic is not really business strategy from my viewpoint;
it's the impact that the Club has or does not have on development.
Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
On Tue
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 16:14, Tom Brinkman wrote:
Ya know LX, IMO, you're gettin way out'a line. First the prime
motivation for many join'n the Club was to support free (speech)
software, particularly MandrakeSoft. I know it was mine. That'n to
avoid being a freeloader. Many, as myself,
--- Leon Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 26 March 2003 08:42 pm, Adam Williamson wrote:
Erm, where exactly is the dictatorship that makes it illegal for women
to be on top during sex? And why isn't America invading it yet? =)
They're too busy planning to invade Australia for
Guys,
I apologize for the overwhelmingly large amount of concern and traffic
this thread has generated, but it seems that the mystery is somewhat
solved. Or seems to be. Although many mirrors still do not have an
md5sums.9.1beta3.asc file, one finally turned up on a mirror in New
Jersey:
I've noticed that most mirrors have all three of the beta3 iso's, some
still do not have iso # 3. More to the point I havent seen an md5sum
file on any of the mirrors yet, and I've checked over 10 of them.
I've almost got all three beta3 iso's downloaded and I'm ready to check
them. Who do I
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 04:36, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
The real test for supermount will be when you can
successfully install a
copy protected game under WineX; like Baldur's Gate 2,
for instance. That's going to be my acid test.
this almost sounds like you are threatening :)
If
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 12:42, Lea Gris wrote:
Charlie a écrit:
|
|This is what I got, and several others have reported to me
|(various mirrors), that their's matched mine.
|
|120610ea02bb6a3ad0f0de594723b4a2 MandrakeLinux-9.1beta3-CD1.i586.iso
|8114ad9397a08fa7d4aea94e34f183f0
On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 04:23, Borzenkov Andrey wrote:
Nope, it is just an accidental side effect. Put_inode (as it was) is buggy
and not needed.
ESTALE was my fault, I did not expect that the same superblock is reused on
remount with busy files. The attached patch plugs the hole
OK, I've done enough work on this now that I feel I should make this
public. I have not been able to download a LM91beta2 ISO that matches
the md5sum checks listed in
md5sums.9.1beta2.asc
which is in the same dir as any of the beta ISO's on any of the mirrors.
I *was* able to get the 2nd
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 15:33, Felix Miata wrote:
Not me.
Most of the people who are using Mandrake (and _not_ most of us) use
Konqueror or Nautilus for their file browsing. Those are the ones that
(I guess) need to be accomodated.
Without FC/2 to take the place of Norton Commander, I
On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 06:31, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 05:16, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 07:03, Adam Williamson wrote:
and Red Hat both make the same decision and don't appear to be filing
for bankruptcy protection...
Redhat have millions
On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 16:05, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 19:51, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
One point I'd like to make is that you use the word irrevelant quite
excessively, mostly when you don't want to mentally encompass the other
person's point of view; the other person
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 03:58, Adam Williamson wrote:
It means that they have some breathing room and clearance from their
debtors so that they can continue business as almost normal. It also
means that we need to buckle down and try to make this company some
money any way we can.
I
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 07:03, Adam Williamson wrote:
and Red Hat both make the same decision and don't appear to be filing
for bankruptcy protection...
Redhat have millions left over from a sucessful IPO, and SuSE have recently
recived a shitload of cash from IBM (to stop them from
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 15:14, Lyall Pearce wrote:
I like using gcombust but ever since mdk 8 (it used to work in mkd 7.2),
it has not quite functioned correctly.
The progress window of a burn is off. (1mb of 5.8mb instead of 10mb of
580mb for example)
It does not affect the operation of the
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 22:43, OS wrote:
And this is not the place to discuss it.
It's as good a place as any, considering how much love, time and money we've
all put into it.
Owen
I've always said on the Expert list and elsewhere; if Linux goes away,
so do all the Linux lists. Same thing
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 15:01, Edward Tandi wrote:
Could it be?
http://www.ofb.biz/modules.php?name=Newsfile=articlesid=192
What does it mean?
It means that they have some breathing room and clearance from their
debtors so that they can continue business as almost normal. It also
means that
On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 11:01, Luca Olivetti wrote:
Well, I don't think that an install only, no upgrade possible policy
is acceptable.
So far you're the only one that has presented install only as an
official policy. My suggestion was to present a base case for
comparison against upgrades.
On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 10:56, Pierre Fortin wrote:
Respectfully, then WHY did Mdk add the 3rd option (2nd upgrade method) --
if upgrades are so bad, Mdk should have removed the existing one, not
added a 2nd one...
You misunderstand. The objective is not to eliminate or deprecate
upgrades;
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 08:00, Pierre Fortin wrote:
On 14 Jan 2003 06:04:19 -0500 Lyvim Xaphir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 10:56, Pierre Fortin wrote:
Respectfully, then WHY did Mdk add the 3rd option (2nd upgrade method)
-- if upgrades are so bad, Mdk should have
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 16:40, Pierre Fortin wrote:
They have been happening since I first upgraded to 9.0 on a fresh 8.2
Have you considered that THAT may be the center of your problem? I have
seldom heard of an upgrade going well. Now bug fixes, normal updates,
and that sort of thing on the
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 19:28, et wrote:
I agree with Pierre, the standard _Needs_ to be what is ubiquitous. while
some might argue the floppy, there are still a $hit load of cdreaders out
there that won't handle 700meg cdroms
There was a vote available on the Mandrakeclub site a while back
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 11:02, Pierre Fortin wrote:
This is NOT a support request for 9.0 --
^
it is a list of reasons I have been VERY unhappy with 9.0 (the product of
Hello everyone, this is my first post to the Cooker list.
Pierre, I'd like to ask a
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 11:47, Brook Humphrey wrote:
Well I dont experiance this but I have used many ac97 sound cards, Hercules
game fortisimo II and III, and cretive labs sound blaster. And none of them
will record sound under kde. It simply does not work. By the way the mic does
work as
64 matches
Mail list logo
