Lors de l'install par floppy je me retrouve avec une erreur sur la 7ème
disquette (checksum incorrect). J'ai essayé avec 2 images de 2 CDs
différents mais rien à faire.
Quelqu'un saurait il comment je peux m'en sortir ?
--
/° Eric Berthomier
(V)_
Le mer 23/10/2002 à 14:36, Eric BERTHOMIER a écrit :
Lors de l'install par floppy je me retrouve avec une erreur sur la 7ème
disquette (checksum incorrect). J'ai essayé avec 2 images de 2 CDs
différents mais rien à faire.
tu as testé la disquette ?
as tu comparé la disquette avec le fichier
On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 11:10:03PM -0800, Robert L. Bransford wrote:
...
Debian Linux 2.2r3. Everything seems to work fine until I reach the part in
...
controller. The m.b. has 2 more controllers (IDE 3 IDE 4) for UDMA-100: on
You need a special boot diskette to recognize your UDMA drives.
Hello,
I am doing something for my first time: building my own
system and install Debian Linux 2.2r3. Everything seems to work fine until
I reach the part in dbootsrap where I need to partion my hard drive(s). At
that point in time, the installer pgm basically says "you don't have any
Je veux installer ma Debian sur un portable IBM Thinkpad, mais j'ai un
poblème lors de la configuration du crontroleur PCMCIA, je ne sais pas
quels paramètres donnés ,et le controleur ne s'initialise pas et par
conséquence je n'est pas de réseaux.
Quelqu'un a-t-il une idée du problème?
Merci
* LEBRETON Philippe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [161101 14:01]:
Je veux installer ma Debian sur un portable IBM Thinkpad, mais j'ai un
poblème lors de la configuration du crontroleur PCMCIA, je ne sais pas
quels paramètres donnés ,et le controleur ne s'initialise pas et par
conséquence je n'est pas de
Hi !
I have an old ISA NIC:
SMC EtherCard Plus Elite
16 Combo (WD/8013EW)
It works fine with Windows 98, Mandrake Linux,
Coyote Linux Router
however in Debian 2.2r3 insmod wd fails
(neitherwith io=0x280 irq=5
nor withautoprobe). Where is the problem ?
sincerely,
Kirill Nelus
)
It works fine with Windows 98, Mandrake Linux,
Coyote Linux Router
however in Debian 2.2r3 insmod wd fails
(neitherwith io=0x280 irq=5
nor withautoprobe). Where is the problem ?
sincerely,
Kirill Nelus
---End Message---
Shaul Karl
email: shaulka (replace these parenthesis with @) bezeqint
¿¿Alguien sabe como hacer funcionar la ATI Xpert
2000 32Mby bajo debian 2.2r3?? hay que hacer algo especial??? esk al intentar
arrancar no me detecta la tarjeta. GRACIAS
On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 06:40:10PM -0300, Fernando wrote:
Estimado debian-user-spanish,
La última Debian 2.2r3 está en español
??
Muchas gracias.
Esta pregunta te debería quedar
Jaime,
I've started a thread on this list on a very similar subject
(re:mixture of potato testing). People have strongly
discouraged me of mixing the different version of debian.
Vittorio
Jaime cristerna Avila [debian-user] 27/09/01 14:46 -0700:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, Jason Boxman wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 02:46:14PM -0700, Jaime cristerna Avila wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, Jason Boxman wrote:
.
There are unofficial XFree 4.x packages for Potato. Perhaps search
the list archives.
.
Thank you Jason for your reply. I considered your suggestion but
Mentioned link should be http://newbiedoc.sorceforge.net/
^
Sorry for typo.
Helmut
Estimado debian-user-spanish,
La última Debian 2.2r3 está en español
??
Muchas gracias.
--
Saludos,
Fernando mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Es increíble! el mejor antivirus para
On Thursday 27 September 2001 23:40, Fernando wrote:
Estimado debian-user-spanish,
La última Debian 2.2r3 está en español
??
Muchas gracias.
no, pero se puede castellanizar
yo, no lo recuerdo
Fernando:
¿La última Debian 2.2r3 está en español?
Unas cosas sí y otras no.
Debian está hecha de materiales de muy diversas procedencias, cada una
con un grado distinto de internacionalización, así que no es una
pregunta que se pueda contestar con un sí o con un no, a menos
que te refieras
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, Jason Boxman wrote:
.
There are unofficial XFree 4.x packages for Potato. Perhaps search
the list archives.
.
Thank you Jason for your reply. I considered your suggestion but was
not pleased with it. If I choose to do it this way, it means that I would
have
video cards
but unfortunately Matrox insists on discontinuing their earlier products.
We can no longer obtain G200 or G400 video cards and are forced to
purchase other cards not supported by the X in Debian 2.2r3. Therefore, I
am considering the installing XFree864.1.x on potato but I don't want
On Tuesday 25 September 2001 05:09 pm, Jaime cristerna Avila wrote:
Hello Everyone,
This is my first time posting onto this list. I don't know if this
question is best directed to user-dpkg. Regardless, I will try asking
here first.
snip
Is there any way, I can keep potato and just
* Roger Broadbent ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010915 16:59]:
It appears that the potato release (2.2r3) uses the Linux kernel version
2.2.19pre17. However, I can only seem to find kernel headers for 2.2.18 or
2.2.19 on the release CD. This appears to mean that to install any modules
without error
Here's what I do, got it from some dual-boot HOWTO or something:
1. The Win2000 system is set up and installed, all OK.
2. Lilo is set up as follows:
boot=/dev/hda5 # instead or boot=/dev/hda
This is the option to install to the partition instead of the MBR.
3. After running lilo, I run
It appears that the potato release (2.2r3) uses the Linux kernel version
2.2.19pre17. However, I can only seem to find kernel headers for 2.2.18 or
2.2.19 on the release CD. This appears to mean that to install any modules
without error messages (I need them for my video chipset my [lin]modem) I
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 05:20:57PM -0600, LaGuardia, Kristofer S. wrote:
I would do that, but there is one main problem that i can't remember if i
mentioned way back in the beginning...I have my three hard drives on a
Promise UDMA66 card...and my DVD and CD burner are on the motherboard.
On Monday Sep 10 22:40 Helmut Trinkl wrote:
** Now, Timo, why confuse it all here?! The user originally requesting
** help, recently installed Debian on his/her computer. He/she can't
** seem to get the GUI to show up, t h e GUI, not some GUI.
Yes! And that's the fact cause i suggested
On Monday Sep 10 03:01 Helmut Trinkl wrote:
** Windowmaker is a window maker. It's called 'Window Maker' and is an X11
** window manager. It's part of a GUI. You won_t be very lucky to run a
** window manager just by itsself. You won_t be very lucky run a GUI
** without a window manager
Timeboy wrote:
On Monday Sep 10 03:01 Helmut Trinkl wrote:
** Windowmaker is a window maker. It's called 'Window Maker' and is an X11
** window manager. It's part of a GUI. You won_t be very lucky to run a
** window manager just by itsself. You won_t be very lucky run a GUI
** without a
Timeboy wrote:
On Saturday Sep 08 15:20 debi narge wrote:
** Hi guys,
**
** I recently installed Debian on my computer. The
** problem is I can't seem to get the GUI to show up.
**
** I'm not even sure if I chose to install the GUI or
** not.
**
** If I didn't install the GUI, is
* Helmut Trinkl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Timeboy wrote:
On Saturday Sep 08 15:20 debi narge wrote:
** Hi guys,
**
** I recently installed Debian on my computer. The
** problem is I can't seem to get the GUI to show up.
**
** I'm not even sure if I chose to install the GUI or
**
Hi guys,
I recently installed Debian on my computer. The
problem is I can't seem to get the GUI to show up.
I'm not even sure if I chose to install the GUI or
not.
If I didn't install the GUI, is there a way to install
it without reinstalling the entire OS?
If the GUI is installed, how
Hi guys,
I recently installed Debian on my computer. The
problem is I can't seem to get the GUI to show up.
I'm not even sure if I chose to install the GUI or
not.
If I didn't install the GUI, is there a way to install
it without reinstalling the entire OS?
If the GUI is installed, how
On Saturday Sep 08 15:20 debi narge wrote:
** Hi guys,
**
** I recently installed Debian on my computer. The
** problem is I can't seem to get the GUI to show up.
**
** I'm not even sure if I chose to install the GUI or
** not.
**
** If I didn't install the GUI, is there a way to
Title: Help installing Debian 2.2r3 (formerly 2.2r17 - brain misfire)
Okay, I didn't install LILO to the MBR. I did install it to the boot partition. However, nothing came up at boot time. Oh well, i will try again tonight...maybe I'm just missing something. Where would I find cd images
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 07:39:17AM -0600, LaGuardia, Kristofer S. wrote:
| Okay, I didn't install LILO to the MBR. I did install it to the boot
| partition. However, nothing came up at boot time. Oh well, i will try
| again tonight...maybe I'm just missing something. Where would I find cd
|
On 2001.09.05 15:39 LaGuardia, Kristofer S. wrote:
Okay, I didn't install LILO to the MBR. I did install it to the boot
partition. However, nothing came up at boot time. Oh well, i will try
again tonight...maybe I'm just missing something. Where would I find cd
images of Woody? I am
Title: RE: Help installing Debian 2.2r3 (formerly 2.2r17 - brain misfire)
Believe me, I don't want to give up on Debian. I would really really like to get it up and running. My biggest problem is Win2000 is installed on the C drive, or first drive, and Debian is installed on the D drive. I
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 10:32:13AM -0600, LaGuardia, Kristofer S. wrote:
| Believe me, I don't want to give up on Debian. I would really really like
| to get it up and running. My biggest problem is Win2000 is installed on the
| C drive, or first drive, and Debian is installed on the D drive. I
Title: RE: Help installing Debian 2.2r3
How did you do it? Also, do you have Win2000 on your first drive and then Debian on your second drive?
-Original Message-
From: Rino Mardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 6:16 AM
To: debian-user
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001 10:32:13 -0600
LaGuardia, Kristofer S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Believe me, I don't want to give up on Debian. I would really really
like
to get it up and running. My biggest problem is Win2000 is installed
on the
C drive, or first drive, and Debian is installed on the D
Title: RE: Help installing Debian 2.2r3 (formerly 2.2r17 - brain misfire )
I would do that, but there is one main problem that i can't remember if i mentioned way back in the beginning...I have my three hard drives on a Promise UDMA66 card...and my DVD and CD burner are on the motherboard. So
Hi,
scanner help needed.
I just installed a fresh Debian 2.2R3 and wanted to scan.
So I installed sane.
But when I run xscanimage it says it can't find any devices.
That makes me wonder, because:
During bootup the the BIOS finds my SCSI scanner
Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
Hi,
scanner help needed.
I just installed a fresh Debian 2.2R3 and wanted to scan.
So I installed sane.
But when I run xscanimage it says it can't find any devices.
That makes me wonder, because:
During bootup the the BIOS finds my SCSI scanner
Hi,
scanner help needed.
I just installed a fresh Debian 2.2R3 and wanted to scan.
So I installed sane.
But when I run xscanimage it says it can't find any devices.
That makes me wonder, because:
During bootup the the BIOS finds my SCSI scanner.
During Linux load
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 08:19:23PM +0200, Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
Hi,
scanner help needed.
I just installed a fresh Debian 2.2R3 and wanted to scan.
So I installed sane.
But when I run xscanimage it says it can't find any devices.
That makes me wonder, because
Hi,
scanner help needed.
I just installed a fresh Debian 2.2R3 and wanted to scan.
So I installed sane.
But when I run xscanimage it says it can't find any devices.
That makes me wonder, because:
During bootup the the BIOS finds my SCSI scanner.
During Linux load, Linux finds my SCSI scanner
| Trabalho em um provedor. 90% do suporte é graças a esse lixo
| inventado pela humanidade: winmodem, softmodem, chamem do que
| quiser.
São de usuários Linux ou usuários Windows? Se for de Linux,
realmente não há drivers para isso, e dependemos de esforço de voluntários
como
At 13:18 2/8/2001 -0300, Pablo Lorenzzoni wrote:
Em Qui 02 Ago 2001 00:27, Linuxperience escreveu:
| Trabalho em um provedor. 90% do suporte é graças a esse lixo
| inventado pela humanidade: winmodem, softmodem, chamem do que
| quiser.
São de usuários Linux ou usuários Windows? Se for
Olah!
Em Qui 02 Ago 2001 00:27, Linuxperience escreveu:
| Quanto a questão dos SoftModems (gostei do termo), não é
| uma idéia tão ruim. A maioria dos usuários não utiliza todo o
| processamento que sua máquinha lhe oferece. Daí você usa um pouco
| desse processamento para o modem e
Vitor Silva Souza wrote:
At 00:01 1/8/2001 -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
Em Tue, 31 Jul 2001 19:37:57 -0300
Ponha a culpa em quem merece. Os fabricantes que não escrevem os
drivers nem
liberam a documentação necessária para escrevê-los.
e linmodem é uma brincadeira...
On Thu, 02 Aug 2001, Gleydson Mazioli da Silva wrote:
um USR 56K ISA funciona com folga em um XT 8Mhz com barramento ISA de 8
bits.
O USR 56K tem muito mais CPU (sob a forma dum DSP + um microcontrolador,
provavelmente) que o XT :P
Heh, meu velho USR Sportster 14k4 (ainda na luta, depois de 5
At 00:01 1/8/2001 -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
Em Tue, 31 Jul 2001 19:37:57 -0300
Ponha a culpa em quem merece. Os fabricantes que não escrevem os
drivers nem
liberam a documentação necessária para escrevê-los.
e linmodem é uma brincadeira... linmodem, na verdade são os winmodens
Quanto a questão dos SoftModems (gostei do termo), não é uma idéia
tão ruim. A maioria dos usuários não utiliza todo o processamento que sua
máquinha lhe oferece. Daí você usa um pouco desse processamento para o
modem e o usuário deixa de pagar R$150,00 num HardModem. O problema
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 12:03:27AM -0300, Vitor Silva Souza wrote:
Pessoal,
Depois de muitos problemas tentando instalar o PCTel PCI no Debian
potato
eu consegui e anotei tudo o que eu fiz para isso num mini-Howto, que segue
anexo. Está em inglês porque mandei para a lista
- Original Message -
From: Vitor Silva Souza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lista Debian Português debian-user-portuguese@lists.debian.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 12:03 AM
Subject: Modem PCTel PCI no Debian 2.2r3
Pessoal,
Depois de muitos problemas tentando instalar o PCTel PCI no Debian
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Wellington Kister do Nascimento wrote:
seja on-board. Na minha opinião o Linux deve ser para todos, não um simples
código-aberto, mas realmente um software que fosse para todos, substituindo
de vez o rwindows. Mas para isto ele deve abranger e possuir drives para
todas as
Em Tue, 31 Jul 2001 19:37:57 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Wellington Kister do Nascimento wrote:
seja on-board. Na minha opinião o Linux deve ser para todos, não um simples
código-aberto, mas realmente um software que fosse para todos,
perguntem.
Abraços,
- Vítor
==
PCTel HSP56 Micromodem PCI at Debian 2.2r3 (potato) Mini-HOWTO 0.1
==
1 - Introduction
1.1 - Purpose
The purpose
At 19:39 25/7/2001 -0300, Vitor Silva Souza wrote:
For the last couple of weeks I've been unsuccessfully trying to
connect to the Internet on my Debian 2.2r3 (potato) distribution, running
kernel 2.2.19pre17, using a PCTel modem.
Hello again,
After a while I did manage to use
the kernel tracing into play.
There seems to be something inherantly broken about the
kernel-image-2.2.19pre17 and kernel-image-2.2.19 on Debian 2.2r3
I can't comment on the kernel-image-* packages as I've never used
kernel images for anything but the basic install. I have been
succesfully running
Hello,
I am having problems loading the HiSax driver in a couple of installations
of Debian potato 2.2r3 using the kernel 2.2.19pre17 which comes as the
default on that release.
Kernel = Linux version 2.2.19pre17 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 2.7.2.3)
#1 Tue Mar 13 22:37:59 EST
On Sat, 28 Jul 2001, Helen McCall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having problems loading the HiSax driver in a couple of installations
of Debian potato 2.2r3 using the kernel 2.2.19pre17 which comes as the
default on that release.
Kernel = Linux version 2.2.19pre17 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc
kernel paging request at virtual address 81009f8c
And other such paging errors bringing the kernel tracing into play.
There seems to be something inherantly broken about the
kernel-image-2.2.19pre17 and kernel-image-2.2.19 on Debian 2.2r3
Another thing I have found is that installing these kernels
Hello users (and hopefully developers) of Debian,
For the last couple of weeks I've been unsuccessfully trying to connect to
the Internet on my Debian 2.2r3 (potato) distribution, running kernel
2.2.19pre17, using a PCTel modem. For those who don't have the time to read
big messages, I'll go
Hello,
I have an ASUS A7V133 motherboard. I've been using Redhat 7.1 for a few
months and now I am already pissed off with RPM. (First I was pissed off
with the RPM system, and now I am pissed off, because the rpm program itself
is causing segmentation faults. And now if I try to re-install
.
-rick
-Original Message-
From: David Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2001 10:57 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: A7V133 motherboard with debian 2.2r3
Hello,
I have an ASUS A7V133 motherboard. I've been using Redhat 7.1 for a few
months
infernal == infernal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
infernal I coudn't find the Unzip utility in my potato.. but the
infernal zip. where in debian.org can I find it ? I can't
Unzip and zip are packaged separately for historical reasons.
You can find them in the non-US section of the archives.
I coudn't find the Unzip utility in my potato.. but the zip.
where in debian.org can I find it ? I can't
edward
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 08:27:08PM -0400, Infernal wrote:
I coudn't find the Unzip utility in my potato.. but the zip.
where in debian.org can I find it ? I can't
You can search for packages and files at -
http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
$ apt-cache search unzip
might net you the
Doing cat on /proc/mdstat only 4 meta devices show up.
Trying to use more results in error.
In /dev I see that 16 meta devices were created. How can I use more
than 4 devices in raid configuaration ?
cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [2 raid0] [3 raid1]
read_ahead 128 sectors
md0 : active raid0
Hello. I'm about to upgrade my X from 3.3.6-11potato
to 4.03 by way of the debs at
http://people.debian.org/~cpbotha and using apt-get.
I've done the apt-get upgrade and started the apt-get
dist-upgrade and became somewhat queasy when the list
of packages to remove came up (below). I would
Na parte release-notes na página da Debian ou nos arquivos ftp da
distribuição.
Nitrogen wrote:
Pessoal,
Onde posso achar especificações sobre a atualização do Debian 2.2r2 para
2.2r3? Já tenho o source.list apontado para umTP americano, mas não sei como
proseguir para a atualização. Além
Pessoal,
Onde posso achar especificações sobre a atualização do Debian 2.2r2 para
2.2r3? Já tenho o source.list apontado para umTP americano, mas não sei como
proseguir para a atualização. Além disso, vale a pena?
Abraços
Leonardo Custodio
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Se o seu sources.list já está correto, basta digitar:
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
Antes de prosseguir ele vai te informar quais pacotes serão
atualizados.
Sim, vale a pena. Esses releases de plataformas estáveis contém
atualizações de segurança e algumas vezes,
Hi all..
Unstable has Samba 2.2.0 but it requires a newer version of libc than is
supplied with 2.2r3. I'm a bit anxious about upgrading lib6 so I got the
sources and compiled Samba under 2.2r3. It compiled fine. Anyone know of any
issues to be aware of? I really need the new Samba in an attempt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
Hi all..
Unstable has Samba 2.2.0 but it requires a newer version of libc than is
supplied with 2.2r3. I'm a bit anxious about upgrading lib6 so I got the
sources and compiled Samba
Michael,
I don't have Debian on my workstation in the office yet (currently
only has win2000 on the first 10GB and FreeBSD 4.3-Stable on the next 10GB,
and haven't gotten Debian on the last 10GB) however I do have XF86 4.0.3
working rather nicely on the Nvidia GeForce2MX 32MB card we
Hello,
Has anyone succeeded in installing Debian on an ATA100
controller. Actually, it did install, but I can only boot with a floppy -
because it won't install lilo - (as i have win2000 on the 10 first Gb). By the
way, does anyone know how to install XFree86 4.0.2 that supports my
I've got a Potato system which has been regularly updated, but I've also
flirted with things like Helix Gnome and installed a few other things
from unstable over the last few months.
I'd like to get back to the Potato purity and stability of 2.2r3 and have
acquired cds to that end.
If I do an
On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 04:25:28PM -0500, Jorge Santos wrote:
Unless of course you use vi...
Ding! :)
email: mutt
news: nn
editor: vim
Mind you, you could ditch those three, and just use (X)Emacs with
Gnus, you'd also get a ton more, when you start using Emacs, you
I
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 10:49:47PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 12:21:07PM +1000, CaT wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 09:14:28PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
CaT writes:
Is it [Gnus] text based...
It's better than that. It's Emacs based.
Ahhh. Not for me
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 09:20:33AM -0500, Michael Marziani wrote:
I have looked around for this but I can't find a list of bug
fixes/improvements in 2.2.19. Anyone have a link? Thanks!
http://www.linux.org.uk/VERSION/relnotes.2219.html
pgpUlFykIY6zP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 05:05:25PM -0700, Eric Richardson wrote:
Ethan Benson wrote:
install the 2.2.19 version of pcmcia modules. i don't know the exact
package name, i have no hardware with pcmcia.
The only version in stable is pcmcia-modules-2.2.19pre17 and so I get
the following
On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 05:35:20AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 05:05:25PM -0700, Eric Richardson wrote:
Ethan Benson wrote:
install the 2.2.19 version of pcmcia modules. i don't know the exact
package name, i have no hardware with pcmcia.
The only version
Lo, on Thursday, April 19, Ethan Benson did write:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 04:42:26PM -0700, Eric Richardson wrote:
apt-get update
apt-get dist-upgrade
apt-get install kernel-image-2.2.19
If I do the last step, will my current kernel be left in place and be
bootable if I have
CaT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 10:49:47PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 12:21:07PM +1000, CaT wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 09:14:28PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
CaT writes:
Is it [Gnus] text based...
It's better than that. It's
On 21 Apr 2001, Jorge Santos wrote:
*snip*
Mind you, you could ditch those three, and just use (X)Emacs with
Gnus, you'd also get a ton more, when you start using Emacs, you
seldom need to use anything else, specially if your trade is
programming.
Well, it's probably best not get too
On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 09:58:02AM -0500, Richard Cobbe wrote:
snip
Ok, then how about this:
Some time ago, before the official Debian kernel-image-2.2.19 was
available, I downloaded the 2.2.19 source from kernel.org and built my own
kernel-image package the Debian way. Everything's
On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 09:43:42AM -0400, Walt Mankowski wrote:
So then what's the recommended way for those of us with laptops
running potato to upgrade to 2.2.19? The 2.2.18 pcmcia modules seem
to be in the same state.
looks to me your options are:
1) install 2.2.19pre17 instead (if it
I have looked around for this but I can't find a list of bug
fixes/improvements in 2.2.19. Anyone have a link? Thanks!
-Mike
-Original Message-
From: Eric Richardson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 6:42 PM
To: Debian User
Subject: Re: debian 2.2r3 ?
Ethan
Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 01:22:16PM -0400, Hall Stevenson wrote:
I track unstable/sid and also routinely do apt-get upgrade with no
apparent problems. Every once in a while, I'll answer 'no' to doing the
upgrade and then do a apt-get -u dist-upgrade
CaT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 02:24:58AM +1000, Kevin Easton wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 09:13:44PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
apt-get update
apt-get dist-upgrade
don't you mean apt-get upgrade? It's not a full release of the distro but
rather
Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 01:22:16PM -0400, Hall Stevenson wrote:
I track unstable/sid and also routinely do apt-get upgrade
with no apparent problems. Every once in a while, I'll answer
'no' to doing the upgrade and then do a apt-get -u
i don't see any point to using upgrade instead of dist-upgrade.
But surelly upgrade has some use, I mean, there's probably some
situation in which you would prefer to use upgrade in place of
dist-upgrade, could someone please shed some light in this isue?
I'm going back to using
upgrade only upgrades what you already have and won't delete any packages,
dist-upgrade will add new packages that got added into the requirements
and delete new conflicts. Use upgrade regularly, and use dist-upgrade
only when you have a real need and are willing to deal with the
consequences
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 12:41:51PM -0500, Jorge Santos wrote:
You, my friend, need Gnus, look at this:
[ Gnus -- 7163 ]
[ Debian -- 1758 ]
*0: nnml:debian-announce
*0: nnml:debian-news
1754: nnml:debian-user
4: nnml:debian-security
[ PostgreSQL -- 3380
Ethan Benson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 04:42:26PM -0700, Eric Richardson wrote:
apt-get update
apt-get dist-upgrade
apt-get install kernel-image-2.2.19
If I do the last step, will my current kernel be left in place and be
bootable if I have problems with the upgrade?
yes,
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 03:51:31PM -0700, Eric Richardson wrote:
fine but couldn't find
/var/modules/2.2.19/pcmcia
I searched the directories and couldn't find the cardbus modules at all.
What should I do now?
I can still boot the old kernel just fine thanks to your help.
install the
Ethan Benson wrote:
install the 2.2.19 version of pcmcia modules. i don't know the exact
package name, i have no hardware with pcmcia.
The only version in stable is pcmcia-modules-2.2.19pre17 and so I get
the following
Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 12:41:51PM -0500, Jorge Santos wrote:
I have. Looks like the announcement got lost in the 600 msgs I wake up
to every morning. Need better colour coding.
You, my friend, need Gnus, look at this:
[ Gnus -- 7163 ]
[ Debian -- 1758 ]
[snip]
This way you can
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 05:35:49PM -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
I was planning to check out Gnus myself, but I find that mutt
and procmail do the job nicely.
I'd love to use procmail to split things up but well... mutt does not
have the best multi-mailbox handling... I've tried it and
CaT writes:
Is it [Gnus] text based...
It's better than that. It's Emacs based.
...and have the features of mutt?
It has all the features of everything. It's Emacs based.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
