Re: change video driver

On 2024-07-07 09:36, mick.crane wrote: On [cough] Trixie, just how do I change the video driver. I'm using driver xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-tesla-470 on older kernel There must have been a reason, likely the available resolution. With kernel 6.9.7-amd64 have to "startx" and then the

change video driver

On [cough] Trixie, just how do I change the video driver. I'm using driver xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-tesla-470 on older kernel There must have been a reason, likely the available resolution. With kernel 6.9.7-amd64 have to "startx" and then the available displays in Xfce are low.

Re: Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

follow the instructions precisely correctly. I had been unable to install the NVidia drivers available as nvidia- driver. After doing the steps outlined at https://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers#Debian_12_.22Bookworm.22,  the response was "you have held broken packages." None of the reco

Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

actualise the package lists. Hope, this helps. Best Hans > at least KDE, and now it won't enter run level 5. I added > nouveau.modeset=0 to the "linux" line in grub.cfg, but it's still > running the nouveau driver, or at least that's what inxi -G reports: >

Re: Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 01:24:21PM -0700, Van Snyder wrote: > On Wed, 2024-07-03 at 23:24 +0200, Hans wrote: > > Hi van Snyder, > > > > I believe I got a solution. However, you may not be happy with it, > > but maybe it will work. > > The solution did i

Re: Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

On Wed, 2024-07-03 at 23:24 +0200, Hans wrote: > Hi van Snyder, > > I believe I got a solution. However, you may not be happy with it, > but maybe it will work. The solution did indeed allow to install the driver. But it removed at least KDE, and now it won't enter run leve

Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

] sid main contrib non-free non-free-firmware then do apt update apt install nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver firmware-misc-nonfree This should install all necessary files and build the kernel module. Here it did work. However, I had to use 390xx instead of 340xx, but both built here fine. After

Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 11:29:43AM -0700, Van Snyder wrote: > On Wed, 2024-07-03 at 08:03 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > Resolve never to buy Nvidia again :) > > 1) On my brother's antique Dell Vostro 1700 laptop, the NVidia G68M > (GeForce 8400M GS) is soldered to the motherboard. > As

Re: Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver firmware-misc-nonfree This should install all necessary files and build the kernel module. Here it did work. However, I had to use 390xx instead of 340xx, but both built here fine. After it, reboot and try again if it is working. Sometimes, nvidia-detect says, use

Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

On Wed, 2024-07-03 at 08:03 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > Resolve never to buy Nvidia again :) 1) On my brother's antique Dell Vostro 1700 laptop, the NVidia G68M (GeForce 8400M GS) is soldered to the motherboard. 2)I'm running NVidia in two desktops because my erstwhile SA gave them to me

Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

> > been able to install the driver, and had no trouble. I made the mistake > > of installing Debian 12.5 on the same partition, so I don't have the > > Debian 10 install anymore. It freezes so completely that the keyboard > > doesn't work, so I can't switch to a TTY screen. E

Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

Van Snyder composed on 2024-06-07 13:29 (UTC-0700): > Has anybody been able to install the NVidia 340.108 video driver in > Debian 12? > The messages I found said "Support for it ended in 2019. Use nouveau." It should have said more. Some of what it should have included

RE: hpe smart array s100i sp - DRIVER

o Suse sería la única por ahora. > Saben si "alguien" pudo reconcerla con algún Debian? Por lo que leo, se trata de una controladora «fake RAID», de ahí que el driver no esté incluido en el kernel :-/ Conidera usar «mdraid» en lugar del driver que te facilite el fabricante, si e

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

Hans: Thanks for the note. It seems that nouveau is a bit more stable in Debian 12.5 than it had been in Debian 10.1. At least I hope it is. So far, it hasn't crashed. MfG, Van On Mon, 2024-06-10 at 10:11 +0200, Hans wrote: > No, the NV6800M needs 340xx driver, not 390xx as I prior pos

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

> In real life no one wants to care of it! Nvidia not, because this > costs money and the developers not, because this is Nvidia and > proprietrary (what is not quite correct, because the kernel-module, > which is the part, that can not be build, is open-source). Since you say it's "open

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

No, the NV6800M needs 340xx driver, not 390xx as I prior posted. However, I have a GF-119 in my Lenovo T520, where nvidia-detect says, it needs 340xx. But, although I got 340xx compiled for the kernel, it did not start. I then build 390xx, which worked like a charm. This happened on my notebook

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

p no further and for the bad news, but do > > > nottry too much - I fear, you will fail! > > > > So far, this is the best advice, so don't apologize. > > I had assumed that when NVidia said I need 340 that it is > > undoubtedlytrue. I'll try 390. > >

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

, this is the best advice, so don't apologize. > > I had assumed that when NVidia said I need 340 that it is undoubtedly > true. I'll try 390. > Have you tried "nvidia-detect" package? This tells you what driver you need. In my machine, I installed nvdia-tesla-470-driver and it works fine.

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

On 08/06/2024 03:29, Van Snyder wrote: Has anybody been able to install the NVidia 340.108 video driver in Debian 12? I am not aware of current state of affairs. Several years ago it was possible to rebuild the .deb package (that uses DKMS) with additional patches to make the code compatible

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

On Fri, 2024-06-07 at 22:47 +0200, Hans wrote: > Just a hint: Sometimes the nvidia-config module says, you need 340.xx, but > this is not always true. My card (with th eolder kernel) was running 390.xx, > although th esystem told me, I have to use 340.xx. 390.xx was running like a > charm,

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

Am Freitag, 7. Juni 2024, 22:29:30 CEST schrieb Van Snyder: Hi! Sadly to tell, that I treid hard to get 340.xx running in Bookworm. The problem is: You can not get it build with the actual kernel sources. I checked and the developers missed some dependencies, the NVidia driver needs at build

NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

Has anybody been able to install the NVidia 340.108 video driver in Debian 12? The messages I found said "Support for it ended in 2019. Use nouveau." But I seem to have trouble with nouveau. When I was running Debian 10 on a Dell Vostro 1700 laptop with NVidia GeForce 8400M graphics,

Re: hpe smart array s100i sp - DRIVER

n hpe smart array s100i sp que ninguna >>> distro de Debian detecta. >>> Por lo que estuve investigando Suse sería la única por ahora. >>> Saben si "alguien" pudo reconcerla con algún Debian? > >> Por lo que leo, se trata de una controladora «fake RAID»

RE: hpe smart array s100i sp - DRIVER

: Camaleón [mailto:noela...@gmail.com] Enviado el: lunes, 27 de mayo de 2024 14:45 Para: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org Asunto: Re: hpe smart array s100i sp - DRIVER El 2024-05-27 a las 11:22 -0300, Marcelo Olcese (Gmail) escribió: (y ahora me ha entrado este otro, vaya retraso lleva Gmail

Re: hpe smart array s100i sp - DRIVER

o Suse sería la única por ahora. > Saben si "alguien" pudo reconcerla con algún Debian? Por lo que leo, se trata de una controladora «fake RAID», de ahí que el driver no esté incluido en el kernel :-/ Conidera usar «mdraid» en lugar del driver que te facilite el fabricante, si

Re: hpe smart array s100i sp - DRIVER

El lun, 27 may 2024 a la(s) 10:23 a.m., Marcelo Olcese (Gmail) ( marcelo.olc...@gmail.com) escribió: > Buenos día gente! > Tengo un server DL380 G10 con un hpe smart array s100i sp que ninguna > distro de Debian detecta. > Por lo que estuve investigando Suse sería la única por ahora. > Saben si

hpe smart array s100i sp - DRIVER

Buenos día gente! Tengo un server DL380 G10 con un hpe smart array s100i sp que ninguna distro de Debian detecta. Por lo que estuve investigando Suse sería la única por ahora. Saben si "alguien" pudo reconcerla con algún Debian? Gracias, Marcelo Olcese.-

Re: Regression in Radeon driver in latest Debian Stable kernel

e. It may > be directed to fixing other bugs. If you can compare Debian and upstream > kernels you may get the issue fixed quicker. Direct communication with > driver developers may be more effective. Indeed; that's why I suggested trying the vanilla kernels of the same versions, compiled wit

Re: Regression in Radeon driver in latest Debian Stable kernel

On 16/05/2024 22:53, piorunz wrote: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ will they be interested in Debian specific error? I don't use vanilla kernel so maybe it's Debian only problem. If you *find* a similar report there then it is likely an upstream issue. (Developers of specific driver may use

Re: Regression in Radeon driver in latest Debian Stable kernel

On 16/05/2024 12:35, Max Nikulin wrote: On 16/05/2024 17:35, piorunz wrote: As much as I would like to try vanilla kernel, I don't want to break my system. I use Debian Stable, don't know if things would just work with vanilla kernel. You may try bookworm-backports kernel 6.6.13+bpo-amd64

Re: Regression in Radeon driver in latest Debian Stable kernel

On 16/05/2024 17:35, piorunz wrote: As much as I would like to try vanilla kernel, I don't want to break my system. I use Debian Stable, don't know if things would just work with vanilla kernel. You may try bookworm-backports kernel 6.6.13+bpo-amd64 You may check https://bugzilla.kernel.org/

Re: Regression in Radeon driver in latest Debian Stable kernel

On 15/05/2024 20:55, Michael Kjörling wrote: You made this bug report less than 48 hours ago. While I can certainly understand that you would like to see it fixed, that's not an inordinate amount of time to wait. What probably _would_ be helpful is to see whether you can recreate the same

Re: Regression in Radeon driver in latest Debian Stable kernel

On 15 May 2024 20:40 +0100, from pior...@gmx.com (piorunz): > I have reported a regression in latest Linux kernel in Debian Stable: > > segfault at amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071080 You made this bug report less than 48 hours ago. While I

Regression in Radeon driver in latest Debian Stable kernel

Hello, I have reported a regression in latest Linux kernel in Debian Stable: segfault at amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071080 It throws a lot of errors related to AMD GPU every day. I also experienced full desktop hang, where I had to restart

Re: e1000e driver Network Card Detected Hardware Unit Hang

t Manager for Red Hat. No, this is not necessarily a kernel bug. It can be a hardware bug and it is plausible it can not be solved with a driver work-around. You are hitting a problem and you want someone else to fix it for you. The answer may simply be that you need to replace the NIC with somet

Re: e1000e driver Network Card Detected Hardware Unit Hang

On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 09:05:29AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > It has been known to happen that drivers implement workarounds for issues > > in the hardware itself, so that hardware bugs do not get tripped (or are > > tripped less often). > >  > > You make it sound like it's a rare

Re: e1000e driver Network Card Detected Hardware Unit Hang

> It has been known to happen that drivers implement workarounds for issues > in the hardware itself, so that hardware bugs do not get tripped (or are > tripped less often).  You make it sound like it's a rare occurrence, but it's actually quite common. Most of it is discrete so you'll rarely

Re: e1000e driver Network Card Detected Hardware Unit Hang

In days of yore (Tue, 16 Apr 2024), Sirius thus quoth: > In days of yore (Mon, 15 Apr 2024), Jamie thus quoth: > > So  there is a very nasty bug in the e1000e network card > > driver. Doing some reading turned up a Proxmox thread about the issues with these Int

Re: e1000e driver Network Card Detected Hardware Unit Hang

In days of yore (Mon, 15 Apr 2024), Jamie thus quoth: > So  there is a very nasty bug in the e1000e network card > driver. https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/articles/05480/ethernet-products.html notes that MSI interrupts may be problematic on some systems. Worth d

Re: Help to report a bug related to a usb3 lan adapter driver

On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 20:57:00 +0200 user7415 same wrote: > I had a discussion in stack exchange related to the problem that is > well explained here: > https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/774594/debian-12-all-of-sudden-my-usb3-lan-adapter-get-assigned-random-mac-address-ea > > For what I

e1000e driver Network Card Detected Hardware Unit Hang

So  there is a very nasty bug in the e1000e network card driver. I am running Debian 12 Bookworm. You will get the message "Detected Hardware Unit Hang" and then the network card just stops working. This is a built in NIC  on the computer The computer is a is a HP Prodesk

Help to report a bug related to a usb3 lan adapter driver

Hello, I'm not very skilled in what concerns to kernel patching and compiling. I had a discussion in stack exchange related to the problem that is well explained here: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/774594/debian-12-all-of-sudden-my-usb3-lan-adapter-get-assigned-random-mac-address-ea

Re: Where to report print driver bug

Am Fri, 23 Feb 2024 14:47:41 -0500 schrieb James Klaas : > "Generic PCL 6/PCL XL Printer Foomatic/pxlcolor (recommended)" Do you know the file that provides that? If so, you apt-file search "file" to find the package that provides it.

Where to report print driver bug

is in, please contact debian-user@lists.debian.org for assistance. I have a Dell 2130cn, which is a PCL6 compatible printer. CUPS/Print manager says "Generic PCL 6/PCL XL Printer Foomatic/pxlcolor (recommended)" is the recommended driver and the only PCL6 driver that actually prints in co

Re: Nvidia driver on Debian 10

es with ii at the beginning mean the package is installed. apt remove *nvidia* -s Check if the result is ok and then run it without -s (-s only simulates). Give it a try to nouveau driver, here it works very well with kernel 6.1.55 the only drawback I have is to restart the windows compositor when

Re: Nvidia driver on Debian 10

On 3/1/24 18:36, Thomas Anderson wrote: I will upgrade Debian to 12 within the next month or so...but before I do, want to clean up my current system. I am running Debian 12 with the nvidia driver. It's mostly OK but I recently had to reboot as the Xorg process had taken around 70% of my

Re: Nvidia driver on Debian 10

Thanks a lot, Macro! it worked. Sorry for delay, I got side tracked with "my day" =) On 03/01/2024 12:03, Marco Moock wrote: Am 03.01.2024 um 11:52:59 Uhr schrieb Thomas Anderson: Here is the output. Wow, a lot. All those lines with ii at the beginning mean the package is installed. apt

Re: Nvidia driver on Debian 10

> dpkg-reconfigure nvidia-kernel-dkms > Hi all, I am using a NVidia card, which is using the Tesla-driver version (525.147.XX) and used the 470.XXX version before. Both could not be installed by using the above package. But it got installed using package module-assistant. Suggestio

Re: Nvidia driver on Debian 10

ithout -s (-s only > simulates). nvidia-driver is the actual top level metapackage so removing that is likely the thing. Although I'm not sure that makes much sense if Thomas gets just a blank screen when booting the kernel without the nvidia drivers. Also I think fixing the drivers for both ins

Re: Nvidia driver on Debian 10

Am 03.01.2024 um 11:52:59 Uhr schrieb Thomas Anderson: > Here is the output. Wow, a lot. All those lines with ii at the beginning mean the package is installed. apt remove *nvidia* -s Check if the result is ok and then run it without -s (-s only simulates).

Re: Nvidia driver on Debian 10

available) un nvidia-alternative-legacy-96xx (no description available) un nvidia-cuda-mps (no description available) un nvidia-current (no description available) un nvidia-current-updates (no description available) ii nvidia-detect 418.226.00-3 amd64 NVIDIA GPU detection utility ii nvidia-driver

Re: Nvidia driver on Debian 10

Am 03.01.2024 um 11:36:03 Uhr schrieb Thomas Anderson: > Key information: > I am aware that there are two different installation paths for the > nvidia driver, either through the repos or from nvidia downloads. > I think I did the later, but I have misplaced, lost, and canno

Nvidia driver on Debian 10

  Driver Version: 418.226.00   CUDA Version: 10.1     | |---+--+--+ |GPU  Name        Persistence-M| Bus-Id        Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC | |Fan  Temp  Perf  Pwr:Usage/Cap|         Memory-Usage | GPU-Util  Compute M

Re: Re: RTL8852 driver for Debian 11

te: > > The only place I found that had the driver required me to install > > more content from online (which I can't access, due to the laptop > > not having an Ethernet port, as well as no wireless). > > It is not unusual for computers (especially laptops) with newer

Re: Re: RTL8852 driver for Debian 11

Hi, Again ignoring your more non-constructive complaints… TL;DR: Try USB networking like by plugging in your phone or a USB ethernet/wifi dongle. On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 07:39:20PM +, Richard Smith wrote: > The only place I found that had the driver required me to install > more c

Re: RTL8852 driver for Debian 11

an support venue. > I'm trying to learn about how to compile a driver (if I can find > one for Debian 12) - if anyone can assist, that would be great! I have a laptop with an RTL8852be which runs Debian 12. I had to install a DKMS module to get support for it. I reported this to debian-kerne

Re: Re: RTL8852 driver for Debian 11

the driver required me to install more content from online (which I can't access, due to the laptop not having an Ethernet port, as well as no wireless). When one couples the above with the Debian site being horrible organized (seriously: it gives me the impression that people don't want you

Re: RTL8852 driver for Debian 11

n > what constitutes as "awesome" in some people's eyes... > > I'm trying to learn about how to compile a driver (if I can find one for > Debian 12) - if anyone can assist, that would be great! Is this an X-Y problem, and you don't really want to compile one, but just find it. Cheers, David.

Re: RTL8852 driver for Debian 11

On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 12:21:28 + Richard Smith wrote: > I find the issue with Debian weird, as I was able to use this same > computer (Lenovo IdeaPad I7, with a Realtek b52 controller) with > Ubuntu, Kali, and Tails, without an issue! What exactly is your problem? Please show error messages,

Re: RTL8852 driver for Debian 11

hours trying to install it to my laptop, I'm beginning to question what constitutes as "awesome" in some people's eyes... I'm trying to learn about how to compile a driver (if I can find one for Debian 12) - if anyone can assist, that would be great! signature.asc Description: OpenP

More printers in the Brother printer-driver-brlaser package

Greetings, There are drivers for more Brother laser printers in the package printer-driver-brlaser . One doesn't have to put up with Brother's atrocious install script to set up the DCP-1610W. The driver package from the Debian repository doesn't produce the extraneous squiggles and blobs

Re: Amanda (was: sata driver compataility Q)

My all time fav for file level backups is BackupPC. De-duplicates files in the compressed pool. Glenn On September 19, 2023 12:18:36 p.m. ADT, gene heskett wrote: >On 9/19/23 08:59, Stefan Monnier wrote: >>> Compared to the setup required for amanda, that sounds very inviting. Amanda >>> has

Re: Amanda (was: sata driver compataility Q)

On 9/19/23 08:59, Stefan Monnier wrote: Compared to the setup required for amanda, that sounds very inviting. Amanda has a very steep learning curve just because it is so versatile I'm still waiting on stuff, so no more actual progress. I used Amanda many years ago and was quite pleased with

Amanda (was: sata driver compataility Q)

> Compared to the setup required for amanda, that sounds very inviting. Amanda > has a very steep learning curve just because it is so versatile I'm still > waiting on stuff, so no more actual progress. I used Amanda many years ago and was quite pleased with it, but I must say I'm having a hard

Re: sata driver compataility Q

On 9/18/23 07:57, Dan Ritter wrote: gene heskett wrote: [...] It looks like the motherboard shares some PCIe and/or SATA lanes between SATA ports and M.2 ports, so you must be careful with your choices.?? I suggest installing an M.2 PCIe x4 SSD into slot M.2_1 and configuring it for "PCIE

Re: sata driver compataility Q

It also cleaned out the database of any links that referenced vtapes that were recycled and re-used. Most hardware- and hybrid hardware/ software RAID solutions expect Windows -- e.g. the manufacturer provides a Windows bundle with device driver, CLI, GUI, etc.. Looking at the Asus PRIME Z370-A II Dri

Re: sata driver compataility Q

On 9/17/23 17:52, David Christensen wrote: On 9/17/23 03:26, gene heskett wrote: On 9/16/23 19:46, David Christensen wrote: On 9/15/23 19:37, gene heskett wrote: On 9/15/23 20:12, David Christensen wrote: On 9/15/23 15:04, gene heskett wrote: On 9/15/23 17:35, David Christensen wrote: On

Re: sata driver compataility Q

On 9/17/23 03:26, gene heskett wrote: On 9/16/23 19:46, David Christensen wrote: On 9/15/23 19:37, gene heskett wrote: On 9/15/23 20:12, David Christensen wrote: On 9/15/23 15:04, gene heskett wrote: On 9/15/23 17:35, David Christensen wrote: On 9/15/23 12:28, gene heskett wrote: I've just

Re: sata driver compataility Q

On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 06:26:49AM -0400, gene heskett wrote: > On 9/16/23 19:46, David Christensen wrote: > > On 9/15/23 19:37, gene heskett wrote: > > > On 9/15/23 20:12, David Christensen wrote: > > > > On 9/15/23 15:04, gene heskett wrote: > > > > > On 9/15/23 17:35, David Christensen wrote: >

Re: sata driver compataility Q

On 9/16/23 19:46, David Christensen wrote: On 9/15/23 19:37, gene heskett wrote: On 9/15/23 20:12, David Christensen wrote: On 9/15/23 15:04, gene heskett wrote: On 9/15/23 17:35, David Christensen wrote: On 9/15/23 12:28, gene heskett wrote: I've just ordered some stuff to rebuild or

Re: sata driver compataility Q

On 9/15/23 19:37, gene heskett wrote: On 9/15/23 20:12, David Christensen wrote: On 9/15/23 15:04, gene heskett wrote: On 9/15/23 17:35, David Christensen wrote: On 9/15/23 12:28, gene heskett wrote: I've just ordered some stuff to rebuild or expand my Raid setup. This 16 port sata-III pci-e

Re: sata driver compataility Q

gene heskett wrote: > On 9/16/23 06:07, songbird wrote: >> gene heskett wrote: >> ... >>> This setup worked instantly under buster and bullseye, but takes from 30 >>> secs to 5 minutes to open a write requestor window asking where to put >>> the download I clicked on under bookworrm. >> >>

Re: sata driver compataility Q

On 9/16/23 06:07, songbird wrote: gene heskett wrote: ... This setup worked instantly under buster and bullseye, but takes from 30 secs to 5 minutes to open a write requestor window asking where to put the download I clicked on under bookworrm. trace the first part of the process and see

Re: sata driver compataility Q

gene heskett wrote: ... > This setup worked instantly under buster and bullseye, but takes from 30 > secs to 5 minutes to open a write requestor window asking where to put > the download I clicked on under bookworrm. trace the first part of the process and see what is taking so long.

Re: sata driver compataility Q

On 9/15/23 20:12, David Christensen wrote: On 9/15/23 15:04, gene heskett wrote: On 9/15/23 17:35, David Christensen wrote: On 9/15/23 12:28, gene heskett wrote: Greetings all; I've just ordered some stuff to rebuild or expand my Raid setup. This 16 port sata-III pci-e card:

Re: sata driver compataility Q

On 9/15/23 15:04, gene heskett wrote: On 9/15/23 17:35, David Christensen wrote: On 9/15/23 12:28, gene heskett wrote: Greetings all; I've just ordered some stuff to rebuild or expand my Raid setup. This 16 port sata-III pci-e card:

Re: sata driver compataility Q

On 9/15/23 17:56, Andy Smith wrote: Hello, On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 05:35:40PM -0400, gene heskett wrote: This setup worked instantly under buster and bullseye, but takes from 30 secs to 5 minutes to open a write requestor window asking where to put the download I clicked on under bookworrm.

Re: sata driver compataility Q

On 9/15/23 17:35, David Christensen wrote: On 9/15/23 12:28, gene heskett wrote: Greetings all; I've just ordered some stuff to rebuild or expand my Raid setup. This 16 port sata-III pci-e card: along with a bigger

Re: sata driver compataility Q

Hello, On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 05:35:40PM -0400, gene heskett wrote: > This setup worked instantly under buster and bullseye, but takes from 30 > secs to 5 minutes to open a write requestor window asking where to put the > download I clicked on under bookworrm. I think you should work out why

Re: sata driver compataility Q

On 9/15/23 15:56, Dan Ritter wrote: gene heskett wrote: Greetings all; I've just ordered some stuff to rebuild or expand my Raid setup. This 16 port sata-III pci-e card: along with a bigger drive cage, cables and

Re: sata driver compataility Q

On 9/15/23 15:56, Dan Ritter wrote: gene heskett wrote: Greetings all; I've just ordered some stuff to rebuild or expand my Raid setup. This 16 port sata-III pci-e card: along with a bigger drive cage, cables and

Re: sata driver compataility Q

On 9/15/23 12:28, gene heskett wrote: Greetings all; I've just ordered some stuff to rebuild or expand my Raid setup. This 16 port sata-III pci-e card: along with a bigger drive cage, cables and such and some

sata driver compataility Q

Greetings all; I've just ordered some stuff to rebuild or expand my Raid setup. This 16 port sata-III pci-e card: along with a bigger drive cage, cables and such and some gigastone 2T drives to make a raid big enough

Re: [IMPORTANT] Debian images no longer works for GPU driver installation with apt update

On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 10:53:35AM -0700, Wenyan Hu wrote: > Hi Team, > > Google's GPU driver installation no longer works for Debian images since > 08/23/2023. > > Google is using > https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/gpus/install-drivers-gpu#installation_scripts >

Re: Debian images no longer works for GPU driver installation with apt update

On 29 Aug 2023 10:53 -0700, from wen...@google.com (Wenyan Hu): > Hi Team, You're in the wrong place. This is a mailing list for Debian _users_ willing to help each other out. Some subscribers might be officially involved with the Debian project in various capacities, but that's not the primary

[IMPORTANT] Debian images no longer works for GPU driver installation with apt update

Hi Team, Google's GPU driver installation no longer works for Debian images since 08/23/2023. Google is using https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/gpus/install-drivers-gpu#installation_scripts to install GPU drivers on Debian images. It executes scripts as https://raw.githubusercontent.com

Re: Bookworm boot stacks with black screen after NVIDIA driver installed.

On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 15:31:52 +0300, Махно wrote: > Hello. Just stick with open source video driver nouveau. This is what I'm doing right now. However it performes, as I already said, "good enough". Meaning there are some problems. It freezes the system from time to time. Well,

Re: Nvidia 390 driver no longer available for Bookworm; nouveau constantly freezes. Solutions?

On 17.08.2023 20:48, Luiz Romário Santana Rios wrote: Hello, all, (Please cc me when replying, I'm not subscribed to the mailing list) I have (according do lspci) a NVIDIA Corporation GK208B [GeForce GT 710] (rev a1) graphics card. The correct proprietary driver for this card seems

Nvidia 390 driver no longer available for Bookworm; nouveau constantly freezes. Solutions?

Hello, all, (Please cc me when replying, I'm not subscribed to the mailing list) I have (according do lspci) a NVIDIA Corporation GK208B [GeForce GT 710] (rev a1) graphics card. The correct proprietary driver for this card seems to be the Nvidia 390 series. When Bookworm came out, I

Re: Bookworm boot stacks with black screen after NVIDIA driver installed.

Hello. Just stick with open source video driver nouveau. 2023-08-16, tr, 04:13 Alexander V. Makartsev rašė: > > On 16.08.2023 04:06, Juan R.D. Silva wrote: > > Hi folks. > > Fresh Bookworm install on Dell M4800 Precision with i7-4810MQ CPU @ 2.80GHz > and NVIDIA Quadr

Re: Bookworm boot stacks with black screen after NVIDIA driver installed.

On 16.08.2023 04:06, Juan R.D. Silva wrote: Hi folks. Fresh Bookworm install on Dell M4800 Precision with i7-4810MQ CPU @ 2.80GHz and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M graphic card. No problems install, the system works with the default nouveau driver well enough. My video card is supported according

Bookworm boot stacks with black screen after NVIDIA driver installed.

Hi folks. Fresh Bookworm install on Dell M4800 Precision with i7-4810MQ CPU @ 2.80GHz and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M graphic card. No problems install, the system works with the default nouveau driver well enough. My video card is supported according to NVIDIA. Debian nvidia-detect advised

Re: Debian as daily driver; WiFi networking and firmware (was: General Questions)

On 25 Jul 2023 18:26 +0600, from rifesourcec...@gmail.com (Source Code): > Using Debian for PC OS is not good? Is it recommended only for servers? Debian is entirely usable as a daily driver workstation OS. I've been using it as such for around a decade, possibly longer; I have old no

Re: Driver r3189 pour carte PCI réseau DLink DGE-528T : jouable ?

Le 18/07/2023 à 01:24, roger.tar...@free.fr a écrit : *De: *"NoSpam" [...] De nos jours le réseau se gère par systemd-networkd ou cloud-init ou netplan (Ubuntu) ou ... Comme l'indique NoSpam certaines méthodes sont

Re: Driver r3189 pour carte PCI réseau DLink DGE-528T : jouable ?

De: "NoSpam" À: "Liste Debian" Envoyé: Lundi 17 Juillet 2023 22:34:41 Objet: Re: Driver r3189 pour carte PCI réseau DLink DGE-528T : jouable ? Le 17/07/2023 à 19:49, [ mailto:roger.tar...@free.fr | roger.tar...@free.fr ] a écrit : [...] La dernière fois, j'

Re: Driver r3189 pour carte PCI réseau DLink DGE-528T : jouable ?

Le 17/07/2023 à 19:49, roger.tar...@free.fr a écrit : [...] La dernière fois, j'avais galéré avec la documentation debian antique (que je prenais pour récente...) et avec les tutos non datés. En fait, NM était installé (debian 9 ou 10) et toutes les invitations des tutos et docs à configurer

Re: Driver r3189 pour carte PCI réseau DLink DGE-528T : jouable ?

- Mail original - De: "Jean-François Bachelet" À: "Liste Debian" Envoyé: Lundi 17 Juillet 2023 18:03:37 Objet: Re: Driver r3189 pour carte PCI réseau DLink DGE-528T : jouable ? hello :) Le 17/07/2023 à 15:45, roger.tar...@free.fr a écrit : > > > Le 1

Re: Driver r3189 pour carte PCI réseau DLink DGE-528T : jouable ?

hello :) Le 17/07/2023 à 15:45, roger.tar...@free.fr a écrit : Le 17 juil. 2023 à 15:01, Bernard Schoenacker a écrit : Bonjour Roger, Pourquoi vouloir rédiger un tel billet qui contient qu'un ensemble de données bonnes à jeter à la poubelle ? Ce qui est viable : lspci -vv |grep -i

Re: Driver r3189 pour carte PCI réseau DLink DGE-528T : jouable ?

Le 17 juil. 2023 à 15:01, Bernard Schoenacker a écrit : BQ_BEGIN Bonjour Roger, Pourquoi vouloir rédiger un tel billet qui contient qu'un ensemble de données bonnes à jeter à la poubelle ? Ce qui est viable : lspci -vv |grep -i ethernet module recherché : realtek 8169

Re: Driver r3189 pour carte PCI réseau DLink DGE-528T : jouable ?

Bonjour Roger, Pourquoi vouloir rédiger un tel billet qui contient qu'un ensemble de données bonnes à jeter à la poubelle ? Ce qui est viable : lspci -vv |grep -i ethernet module recherché : realtek 8169 recherche sur la machine : find /lib/modules -name r8169.ko réponse :

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >