.
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 08.03.2024 um 13:19 schrieb Gary Gregory :
>
> The next question is whether any of this should be mentioned/recorded in
> the Javadoc or at least in a code comment.
>
> Gary
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2024, 5:24 AM Mark Struberg
> wrote:
>
>
ller? Not
> sure about this though.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 8:55 AM Gary D. Gregory wrote:
>
>> On 2024/03/07 06:58:30 Mark Struberg wrote:
>>> The question to me is how we can make it more robust.
>>> In a Collection (but actually also in most lists
thinking about it: what if we *always* invoke equals()
first, and if it returns true -> return true and skip the rest for this tree?
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 07.03.2024 um 14:55 schrieb Gary D. Gregory :
>
> On 2024/03/07 06:58:30 Mark Struberg wrote:
>> The question to me is how w
est you test and iterable over a Collection
> instead of a List.
>
> Then you'd need a separate test and traversal for Map instances.
>
> (Still no common super-interface in Java 21 for Collections and Maps...)
>
> Gary
>
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 7:40 AM Mark Struberg
&
;useEqualsIfPresent".
>
> Gary
>
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2024, 5:03 AM Mark Struberg
> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I have a question about EqualsBuilder#reflectionEquals. From Java9 onwards
>> we get more and more nasty module problems. Mainly because the code
Hi!
I have a question about EqualsBuilder#reflectionEquals. From Java9 onwards we
get more and more nasty module problems. Mainly because the code tries to
recurse into java.util.* classes as well.
I know that I can use setBypassReflectionClasses for those. But wouldn't it be
fine to have an
Oracle changed the license past Java8. Oracle Java is not free anymore. OpenJDK
is though. So for anything later people have to move to AdoptOpenJDK. And
company executives seem to be not sure about that move yet. Also the half year
cadence leads to way less testing on a specific Java Version.
for calling create(). But of course, that has other
potential issues :/
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 28.11.2018 um 04:21 schrieb Phil Steitz :
>
> On 11/26/18 1:23 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 11/26/18 8:29 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 11/26/18 6:19 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>&
I think we still need to address what happens if null gets returned in create().
This was something I missed.
Not sure if it got addressed in the meantime?
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 26.11.2018 um 14:26 schrieb Rob Tompkins :
>
>
>
>> On Nov 26, 2018, at 8:16 AM, Mark Struberg
en.
So I fear we really need to tackle this. Stackoverflow and our own bug tracker
is full of such reports :(
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 23.11.2018 um 16:51 schrieb Phil Steitz :
>
> On 11/23/18 2:57 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>> should read: This change (putting a new item back to the i
.
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 23.11.2018 um 16:18 schrieb Gary Gregory :
>
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 2:57 AM Mark Struberg
> wrote:
>
>> should read: This change (putting a new item back to the idle pool) was
>> needed to prevent a dead-lock
>>
>> *grabbing a fresh
ted:<5> but was:<4>
>at
> org.apache.commons.pool2.impl.TestAbandonedObjectPool.testAbandonedInvalidate(TestAbandonedObjectPool.java:202)
>
> Maybe this is due to my busy CPU, not sure.
>
> Gary
>
>
>>
>> Phil
>>
>> On 11/19/18 2:31 P
should read: This change (putting a new item back to the idle pool) was needed
to prevent a dead-lock
*grabbing a fresh coffee*
> Am 23.11.2018 um 10:49 schrieb Mark Struberg :
>
> This change (putting a new item back to the idle pool was needed to prevent a
&g
+1. This is so trivial that it doesn't pass the threshold of originality.
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 19.11.2018 um 18:15 schrieb Mark Thomas :
>
> I'd image the comment is referring to the use of "... & 0xFF" but it
> seems to be a fairly pointless comment as that is just the standard way
> to switch
ade it into the test code in one of the
> commits related to POOL-340.
>
> Phil
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> -Rob
>>>
>>>> On Nov 19, 2018, at 7:18 AM, Mark Struberg
>>> wrote:
>>>> Oki, I now see
>> écrit
>>> :
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 8:59 AM Mark Struberg
>> >>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Oki, now the full VOTE text!
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to call a VO
Let's see how the commons-pool2 release works out.
If it does then we have significantly reduced the work to run the release.
It's basically down to:
* ensure jira tickets are resolved and tracked in changes.xml
* generate the release_notes updates
* create a release branch with %> git checkout
n the Apache Nexus repo instead of the dist tree.
>
> This is different from how we usually do RCs but is should be OK.
>
> Not sure about using GitHub though...
>
> Gary
>
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018, 09:00 Mark Struberg
>> PS: the VOTE is open for 72h from now o
PS: the VOTE is open for 72h from now on.
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 14.11.2018 um 16:58 schrieb Mark Struberg :
>
> Oki, now the full VOTE text!
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache Commons pool2 2.6.1
> The release was run with JDK-1.7 to ensure Java7 compatibilit
,
strub
> Am 14.11.2018 um 10:13 schrieb Mark Struberg :
>
> PS: I've created the release in a GIT manner and pushed the according changes
> to my ASF-linked github repo
>
> https://github.com/struberg/commons-pool/tree/release_branch_2.6.1
> the sha1 of the commit is
One more option.
Which is good for the Java ecosystem.
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 14.11.2018 um 15:14 schrieb Rob Tompkins :
>
> Curious to see what people’s thoughts are to this:
>
> https://aws.amazon.com/corretto/
>
> -Rob
> -
>
level a long
time ago (when we did DeltaSpike and CouchDB as the very first GIT repos at the
ASF) and is perfectly fine as all this is based on cryptographically strong
steps.
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 14.11.2018 um 09:17 schrieb Mark Struberg :
>
> Hi folks!
>
> I'm currently prepar
Hi folks!
I'm currently preparing the release for commons-pool2-2.6.1
So far I did
* fix the missing parts in changes.xml
* generate + copy the RELEASE_NOTES
* run the maven release (after fixing the setup...)
The ASF staging repository is at
ered by unit tests? That should do it I hope.
>
> Gary
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 12:56 AM Mark Struberg
> wrote:
>
>> sorry should have read "did anyone TEST my pool fixes".
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>> Am 10.11.
sorry should have read "did anyone TEST my pool fixes".
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 10.11.2018 um 23:24 schrieb Gary Gregory :
>
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 1:24 PM Mark Struberg
> wrote:
>
>> Did anyone fix my pool fixes?
>
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> Can
Did anyone fix my pool fixes?The latest deployed pool and dbcp2 snapshots do
contain them.
Would love to start a release but I think I need some guidance.
Any docs for how it runs in commons land?
txs and LieGrue,strub
On Friday, 2 November 2018, 17:01:44 CET, Gary Gregory
wrote:
I
s been added, which is not clear
> since it seems changes.xml has not been updated for the commits over the
> last week or two.
>
> Gary
>
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 6:49 AM Mark Struberg
> wrote:
>
>> I've went through the list and pretty much the only ticke
,
strub
> Am 29.10.2018 um 09:35 schrieb Mark Thomas :
>
> On 28/10/18 11:09, Mark Struberg wrote:
>> Hi folks!
>> I've worked through the open POOL tickets and found a few tickets which
>> would like to enhance a few of our interfaces.
>> E.g. in POOL-355 we h
Txs gary!
When will there be a new reelase run?
If it's worth I could also do the release manager IF the project is properly
set up.
Means if it's a straight forward maven release then I gonna run it the same as
my other dozen ASF projects.
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 28.10.2018 um 15:29 schrieb
Hi folks!
I've worked through the open POOL tickets and found a few tickets which would
like to enhance a few of our interfaces.
E.g. in POOL-355 we have a request to add a new method getMaxNumActive() to the
ObjectPool interface.
Now this would of course be a backward compatibility breaking
Hi Gary!
I've seen that PoolTest is ignored since you committed it back in 2016. But
it's actually all green.Is there still something missing? Or can we simply
enable it?
txs and LieGrue,strub
Looks like a glitch.
The class looks exactly the same like in 2.3.
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 25.10.2018 um 00:11 schrieb Gary Gregory :
>
> I do not understand why Clirr is showing one error here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/configuration/2.4-RC2/site/clirr-report.html
>
>
hi folks!
Would be cool if someone firm in this project might review my patch for
POOL-356https://github.com/apache/commons-pool/pull/11
I gonna commit it tomorrow morning if there was no negative feedback.
txs and LieGrue,strub
Hi folks!
While fixing a deadlock in commons-pool I also stumbled across
System.currentTimeMillis();quite a few times.It's no biggie but I would still
love to get your feedback and experience.
If I remember correctly then one should use Sytem.nanoTime() in those cases.a.)
afair
checked the source zip from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/weaver/2.0-RC1/source/
sha512 fine
sig fine
builds fine
RAT passes.
+1
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 04.09.2018 um 17:58 schrieb Matt Benson :
>
> I would like to release the [weaver] component.
>
> Apache Commons Weaver 2.0
The git repo is on ASF gitbox
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-weaver.git
It's also listed on the gitbox overview page:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf
And here is the ASF mirror on GitHub
https://github.com/apache/commons-weaver
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 05.09.2018 um 08:46 schrieb
+1 for a commons-weaver release.
txs and LieGrue,
strub
> Am 03.08.2018 um 02:04 schrieb Gary Gregory :
>
> Good luck! :-)
>
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018, 17:59 Matt Benson wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> If it wasn't obvious, I'm gearing up to create a 1.4 RC in the near future.
>> I will serve as the
> This is unlikely to happen as long as it does not cover multi-module builds
The maven-release-plugin covers multi-module releases since many years.
In the projects I'm working on there is no 'release manager'.
_Everybody_ can do releases without having to know anything special.
This is where
Hi folks!
I'd like to run a commons-weaver release.
We need it for Apache BVal.
The new version adds Java9+10 support, etc
Any objections?
LieGrue,
strub
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For
+1
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 24.10.2016 um 14:36 schrieb Johannes Weberhofer
> :
>
>
>
> Am 21.10.2016 um 19:42 schrieb Thomas Vandahl:
>> I would like to beta-release the [jcs] component.
>>
>> Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 RC1 is available for review at:
>>
SecurityManager is an ancient part and heavily slows down the JVM. That’s the
reason why almost nobody is using it.
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 08.11.2015 um 20:20 schrieb James Carman :
>
> I think this entire thing can be prevented with a security manager and a
> proper
.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2015-01-25 22:35 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg
strub...@yahoo.de:
is that all?
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jcs/trunk/commons-jcs-core/src
is that all?
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jcs/trunk/commons-jcs-core/src/aspect/org/apache/commons/Trace.aj
Wouldn't it be actually quite easy to replace this?
LieGrue,
strub
On Sunday, 25 January 2015, 19:30, Thomas Vandahl t...@apache.org wrote:
On 25.01.15 17:00,
at 11:52 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
wrote:
2014-11-19 8:44 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de:
Jochen, I might have done something wrong so please help me.
I've checked out your svn link and built it.
Then I did a
$ mvn clean -DincludeScope=runtime dependency:copy
Hi!
I've never seen any other ASF project where it is such a torture to release.
This is partly because the quality level is really high, but a big part of it
is that we don't have a mature parent pom.
I have no clue why we don't just use the common apache parent pom. I've NEVER
experienced
, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 December 2014 at 12:26, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi!
I've never seen any other ASF project where it is such a torture to
release.
This is partly because the quality level is really high, but a big part of
it is that we don't have
Hi Olivier!
There are ways to just exclude known jars from getting scanned by OpenWebBeans.
And if the current solution isn't sufficient then just pop up on our list and
we gonna implement it. Maybe I've overlooked you on the list or did you not yet
reach out to us?
LieGrue,
strub
-
- I'm under the impression there are already well established
implementations of JSR 330
Well, the problem I see with this very approach is that it says it 'implements
JSR-330'.
As an EG member I can tell you that atinject is only the least common
denominator of the 'user side' of the story.
Sorry, did not mean to step on somebody's toes.
No worries you didn't. It's most probably our fault as our (OpenWebBeans)
documentation sucks and we did not properly document all this stuff ;)
If one of you guys is at ApacheCon in Budapest right now, then I'd love to give
you a quick rush
guice and guava for?
Also there is an own ASF package for atinject [1].
LieGrue,
strub
[1]
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec/1.0/
On Wednesday, 19 November 2014, 8:34, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Sorry, did not mean to step
Well my personal experience only:
1.) I barely use distributed caches. I use ehcache in most of my projects as of
today, but do not use the distribution feature much. Way too complicated
2.) What actually IS useful is distributed cache invalidation. The caching side
is fine to just select any
Weird, it compiles on my box (Oracle1.7 and 1.8 on Mac) and I get another
compile error with Apple java-1.6.0_65
Have to finish a presentation till monday and work on BatchEE for $$dayjob. So
I will only be able to help again starting with Thuesday.
LieGrue,
strub
On Friday, 2 May 2014,
the effective pom that they are
not used in all invocations, at least they made the build fail (and I
wrongly corrected them).
Bernd
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
wrote:
Actually the ',' causes a bug in the maven-javadoc-plugin.
What
seems to work
what about commons lightning talks?
5 minutes about a certain commons feature.
There are plenty to choose from...
LieGrue,
strub
On Friday, 2 May 2014, 10:28, Siegfried Goeschl sgoes...@gmx.at wrote:
Hi Benedikt,
there might be a lot of different kinds there :-)
IMHO the problem with Let
-Xdoclint:all -Xdoclint:-missing -Xdoclint:-html
That should fix the issue.
ATTN: this must ONLY be done in a java8 profile! If you set those params in
older java versions (1.7, 1.6) then the build will blow up...
LieGrue,
strub
On Wednesday, 30 April 2014, 7:47, Paul Benedict
so it would be nice if our components do compile and work on Java 8
It does of course. But if you compile with java8 then it _might_ not work with
older java versions. So it's fine for packages built by Fedora FOR Fedora. But
those jars might not work on any other linux distro. Which is ok from
Hi folks!
I've moved the TCK run into an own profile. You can activate it via
$ mvn clean install -PjcacheTck
We should also activate it by default during a release.
Btw, why is this project target 1.7? We do not use anything from java7 right?
LieGrue,
strub
I would prefer it if the reports were warnings rather than errors, but
generally they seem sensible.
Allow me to disagree. Breaking the javadoc just because a @param is missing is
imo plain wrong.
Usually parameters should be self-explaining. I personally only document
interfaces and methods
2014, 11:05, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
I would prefer it if the reports were warnings rather than errors, but
generally they seem sensible.
Allow me to disagree. Breaking the javadoc just because a @param is missing
is
imo plain wrong.
Usually parameters should be self
Well, the TCK runs fine with source and target 1.6. There is nothing in our
code which requires java7 yet. Thus there is imo no reason to force it.
LieGrue,
strub
On Thursday, 1 May 2014, 9:53, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi folks!
I've moved the TCK run into an own
/rmannibucau
2014-05-01 12:24 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de:
Well, the TCK runs fine with source and target 1.6. There is nothing in our
code which requires java7 yet. Thus there is imo no reason to force it.
LieGrue,
strub
On Thursday, 1 May 2014, 9:53, Mark
Hi!
I've looked at Continuum and it seems like it fails since weeks now.
Anyone successfully did run it with jdk-1.6?
If so, we should rather look at the Continuum config.
LieGrue,
strub
On Thursday, 1 May 2014, 16:39, Thomas Vandahl t...@apache.org wrote:
On 01.05.14 09:52, Mark
Btw, fixed a few broken tests yesterday night, fixed the broken pom and added a
few ALv2 license headers.
Now all builds fine on my local box (w java8).
LieGrue,
strub
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014, 22:20, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
plz folks do a full build before committing stuff
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-04-30 8:26 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de:
Btw, fixed a few broken tests yesterday night, fixed the broken pom and
added a few ALv2 license headers.
Now all builds fine on my local box (w java8).
LieGrue,
strub
On Tuesday, 29 April
plz folks do a full build before committing stuff next time.
Will fix the hamcrest deps now.
LieGrue,
strub
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014, 20:58, Thomas Vandahl t...@apache.org wrote:
On 28.04.14 20:55, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 28/04/2014 20:44, Thomas Vandahl a écrit :
This throws me out of
+1
The poms don't include any groupId definitions.
Not needed and sometimes even a source of problems. If you do not need to write
something than adding it only raises the chance it gets wrong.
- The jar artifacts contain LICENSE and NOTICE without the .txt extension.
That's perfectly fine.
+1
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Friday, 20 September 2013, 19:49
Subject: [VOTE] Promote [weaver] component out of sandbox
Hi Commons developers,
I hereby propose a vote to promote the
JFTR: in Apache OpenWebBeans we switched to ASM because Javassist caused too
much mem leaks and hassles.
But we do only use reflection when it's really needed. Means methods which are
neither delegated nor intercepted will delegated via native java calls.
The same happens for 'NormalScoped'
Hi folks!
Romain is a great guy, I've now added him to commons-sandbox.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, 27 July 2013, 3:46
Subject: Re: commons-monitoring?
On
+1
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Friday, 28 June 2013, 14:18
Subject: [VOTE][LAZY] Release Commons Parent 32 from RC1
T his is a VOTE to release Commons Parent 31-RC2
This VOTE by LAZY-CONSENSUS is open
I'm not sure if this is needed in this case.
The Java interceptors spec got moved out of EJB a long time a go and is now a
standalone spec which is used by CDI, Spring and guice.
The package is javax.interceptor and contains all the stuff we need.
If we do it in a similar style than Apache
- Original Message -
From: Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com
Weaver#weave():
Currently there are separate methods for weaving a class vs. a method. I
think it would be sufficient and cleaner to have a class weaving method
only; having provided its interests, the Weaver can
Hi!
Not sure if this is worth doing, but could be nice from a usability pov.
Usually projects have a lot of blocks which need doPrivileged copied over from
one class to the other.
Using @Privileged makes this a lot easier. But you still need to add private
methods to all your classes...
Now
or just move it to a profile?
In our project we have this enabled via
$ mvn clean instal -Pcoverage
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2012 9:43 AM
Any better suggestions for [math]?
Yes, as I see it there are two options.
a.) move some parts into a profile
b.) create 2 parent pom. One with the infrastructure stuff and one with all the
tons of additional goodies only needed for the other projects.
LieGrue,
strub
PS: I find it pretty
Can anyone plz commit the pom upgrade for sandbox-parent?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDBOX-437
Need this for commons-weaver.
LieGrue,
strub
From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Sent
I have no clue what the annotation processing is for, but might that be a
candidate for the upcoming commons-weaver (formerly privilizer) ?
It takes CLASS/RUNTIME annotations a modifies the bytecode in the class
directly.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Simone Tripodi
://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
I have no clue what the annotation processing is for, but might that be a
candidate for the upcoming
Hi!
Seems like our commons-sandbox-parent is stone old.
It points to a commons-parent-15 which is now 12 versions old ;)
I'll fix this, check a few problems which I had with the old version and ship a
patch.
LieGrue,
strub
I changed the privilizer weaver to blow up with an Exception if an access level
is set and a @Privileged method which has a wider accesslevel got detected.
Imo this is a clear user error if one defines a public @Privileged method and
explicitly only wants them being private.
Imo this is the
Jörg, what about all older living projects which used to have own groups even,
like commons-lang:commons-lang?
Could you point me to this boilerplate stuff you think off? Maybe we can
improve this.
I have no problem with moving the packages back, but I personally think this
would á la long
/privilizer/
modules/privilizer/api/
modules/privilizer/api/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/weaver/privilizer/
modules/privi...
Hi Mark,
Mark Struberg wrote:
Jörg, what about all older living projects which used to have own groups
even, like commons-lang:commons-lang?
groupIds
committed in r1424835.
Please note that weaver alone has 11 modules so far. And it's likely to become
more...
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 10:43 AM
Hi!
Yes, I find it not very handsome to pollute the o.a.commons directory itself
with tons of modules which are completely unrelated to each other. That is fine
with a single module project but imo definitely not ok for a project which
consists of a few sub-modules.
Thus I'd rather collect
we had this over here at UPC as well. This did cost Sigi a release as well if
you remember ;)
Most times this can be disabled by your provider. Just phone them and explain
that they are breaking your computer and this creates costs by them not acting
standard conform ;)
LieGrue,
strub
One of the stuff I heard way back was that BCEL still has no native Java7
support.
Is this still true? Imo that was one of the reasons why openjpa went for doing
parts of the bytecode stuff with ASM...
Happy to get proved wrong ;)
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Matt
+1
It might fit to any component which does _not_ introduce a runtime dependency
but is only needed at compile time. Basically the privilizer is kind of a
preprocessor.
If such a kind of component already exists in commons, then we can look if it
fits to the business of this component.
@commons.apache.org; Mark Struberg
strub...@yahoo.de
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 5:31 PM
Subject: Re: [privilizer] new sandbox component
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Heh, the other option has been 'privilator'
Catchy as well, and would have
; Mark Struberg
strub...@yahoo.de
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 4:22 PM
Subject: Re: [privilizer] new sandbox component
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 4:57 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Oki, let me explain what I meant.
Currently the methods must be private to be really secure
:
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 6:40 AM
Subject: Re: [privilizer] new sandbox component
G lad to hear it, Phil! I was originally calling it privileged method
weaver but that's a little long for a Commons component. Mark
Struberg
came up with privilizer for me--short, but still fairly
+1, such a thingy is needed pretty often!
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2012 4:50 PM
Subject: Re: Proposal Commons-JNDI
On 8/7/12 11:02 PM, Jochen
an 'Archive' abstraction layer which we could plug-in.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Honton, Charles charles_hon...@intuit.com
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org; gudnabr...@gmail.com
gudnabr...@gmail.com; Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
Cc:
Sent: Monday
Regarding the new URL() problem some of you might have more experience than I
do. I only know the problems on some platforms, and after looking at the URL
class in detail, I really wonder whether that was me doing it wrong or a
platform bug.
My understanding problem is mainly around the
no. and thats exactly the problem.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Honton, Charles charles_hon...@intuit.com
To: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de; Commons Developers List
dev@commons.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2012 5:28 PM
Subject: Re: [classscan] new URL
Hi folks, quick reply from vacation :)
@sebb: yes correct. I was just thinking too complicated. We use the interface
only for keeping the metainfo, and not in the metainfo itself. So it should
itself not blow up the mem. So +1 for the interface.
There are 2 important consideration options
we have an own Sonar installation at http://analysis.apache.org already.
You just need to tell infra that you like to have your project added.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Cc:
Hi!
I now moved all the stuff to trunk.
Next I'll work on a structure for the API and extract a mainingful api from
both Chas' and Davids 'backends' + do the initial maven setup stuff.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
To: Commons Developers
Hi!
Should we set our java language level to java5 or java6?
LieGrue,
strub
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Hi!
I've now looked through both impls and both share some very similar API classes
obviously (MetaClass, MetaField, etc). Details are different, but I think we
can extract a common API.
One thing I figured while looking at the code is that some parts are full with
URI handling instead of
Hi!
I now did read through the metadata classes of Chas' and Davids impls.
Both look pretty similar to some degree. A few key differences
* using AnnotatedElement instead of HasName() makes it possible to replace most
'old' code which does getAnnotations() etc 1:1
Imo we should keep this
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo